English

• Birefringent crystals are important optical functional components in commercial, agricultural, industrial, and military fields [1-4]. Some crystals have been commercialized, such as CaCO₃ [5], YVO₄ [6], MgF₂ [7], TiO₂ [8], and LiNbO₃ [9]. In recent years, the requirements for miniaturization of devices have also increased, with the rapid development of photoelectric technology. The miniaturization of devices requires that crystals must have sufficiently large birefringence [10-12]. Therefore, it is very important to explore the optical materials with large birefringence for the development of science and technology.

  Based on the structure-property relationship in birefringent crystals, scientists generally believe that introducing functional units with high polarization anisotropy is conducive to the development of materials with large birefringence [13,14]. Stereo-chemically active lone pair cations, such as Sn²⁺, I⁵⁺, Te⁴⁺, and Se⁴⁺, as well as d⁰ transition metal (TM) cations like V⁵⁺, Mo⁶⁺, W⁶⁺, often exhibit significant polarization anisotropy, which favors enhanced birefringence [15,16]. As a result, a series of compounds with large birefringence, including, Sn₉O₄Br₉Cl (0.273@1064 nm) [17], CaYF(SeO₃)₂ (0.127@1064 nm) [18], ZrF₂(IO₃)₂ (0.329@1064 nm) [19] and LiGa(IO₃)₄ (0.23@1064 nm) [20], have been synthesized. Moreover, d¹⁰-TM like Zn²⁺, Cd²⁺, and Hg²⁺, with their highly polarizable and deformable 18-electron configurations, can also significantly enhance birefringence [21,22]. For instance, compounds such as HgTeO₂F(OH) (0.09@1064 nm) [23], H₁₁C₄N₂CdI₃ (0.090@546 nm) [24] and LiZn(OH)CO₃ (0.147@1064 nm) [25] display notable birefringence. Among them, Hg has garnered considerable attention due to its versatile coordination geometries and oxidation states. For example, Hg^Ⅰ exhibits a linear O—Hg-Hg-O coordination [26,27], while Hg^Ⅱ can adopt trigonal HgO₃, tetrahedral HgO₄, square-planar HgO₄, octahedral HgO₆ and polyhedral HgO_n coordination environments [28-33]. This diversity and flexibility in structure enable the discovery of a broad range of birefringent crystals.

  Our group has conducted systematic research on the Hg-based tellurite system and successfully synthesized a series of compounds with excellent properties, such as Hg₂(TeO₃)(SO₄) (0.146@546 nm), Hg₃(Te₃O₈)(SO₄) (0.182@546 nm), Hg₂^ⅠHg^Ⅱ(Te₂O₄)₂(HPO₄)₂ (0.444@546 nm) [26], and Hg₄(Te₂O₅)(SO₄) (0.542@546 nm) [27]. Notably, Hg₄(Te₂O₅)(SO₄) represents the largest birefringence reported among inorganic oxysalts. Se⁴⁺, which is stereo-chemically similar to Te⁴⁺ in the same main group, also possesses active lone pairs. Combining Se⁴⁺ with Hg often results in compounds with large birefringence. However, within this system, only three compounds have been reported with birefringence exceeding 0.1: Hg₃(SeO₃)₂(SO₄) [28], Hg₂(SeO₃)(SO₄) [32], and MgHg(SeO₃)₂(H₂O)₂ [34]. Therefore, systematic research in this area is essential. Based on this, we initially explored the Hg-Se-O system and successfully synthesized a NCS compound, HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄. This compound exhibits 60% of the SHG efficiency of commercial KDP; however, its birefringence is only 0.032@546 nm. Structural analysis revealed that the highly symmetric HgO₄ square-planar and GaO₆ octahedral coordination environments contribute minimally to birefringence. To overcome this limitation, we proposed introducing linear groups and fluoride ions to optimize the structure, thereby achieving enhanced birefringence [35]. The intended purpose of introducing fluoride ions is to reduce the coordination between the GaO₆ and SeO₃ groups, thereby enhancing the synergistic effect of the SeO₃ group. Meanwhile, the introduction of the linear Hg₂O₂ group aims to maximize the birefringence of the compound (Fig. 1). Guided by the above ideas, we successfully synthesized Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F. Notably, Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F is the first reported Hg^Ⅰ-based selenite birefringent material and exhibits excellent transparency in the MIR region. Herein, we provide a detailed description of the synthesis, crystal structure, thermal stability, and optical properties of these compounds.

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  Design roadmap for Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ and Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F have been synthesized through hydrothermal reactions at 200 ℃. Detailed synthetic methods can be found in Synthesis section in Supporting information. The purities of the obtained products were confirmed using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), as shown in Fig. S1 (Supporting information).

  The HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ crystallizes in the NCS space group I-42d. The asymmetric unit of the crystal is composed of one selenium atom, one gallium atom, one mercury atom, and three oxygen atoms. Mercury and gallium atoms occupy special positions with occupancies of 0.25 and 0.5, respectively. The selenium atom is connected to three oxygen atoms to form a SeO₃ trigonal pyramid structure, while the gallium atom is coordinated with six oxygen atoms in an octahedral configuration. The Se-O bond lengths range from 1.682 Å to 1.715 Å, and the Ga-O bond lengths vary between 1.955 Å and 1.999 Å. The mercury atom, in a divalent state, is connected to four oxygen atoms, forming a planar square structure with each Hg-O bond length being 2.269 Å. According to the bond valence calculation results presented in Table S2 (Supporting information), the oxidation states of selenium, gallium, and mercury are + 4, + 3, and + 2, respectively.

  HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ exhibits a complex three-dimensional (3D) structure composed of a 3D gallium selenite framework and HgO₄ planar square units (Fig. 2). In this structure, isolated GaO₆ octahedra are aligned along the a, b, and c axes of the crystal, with each GaO₆ octahedron connected to six SeO₃ groups (Fig. S2 in Supporting information). The SeO₃ groups act as linkers in this structure, bridging the isolated GaO₆ octahedra to form a continuous 3D gallium selenite framework (Fig. 2a). Meanwhile, the HgO₄ planar square units are nestled within the voids of this framework, providing stability to the entire structure (Fig. 2b).

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  (a) The 3D mercury selenate structure, (b) 3D structure of HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄. (c) The 2D gallium selenite layered structure and (d) 3D structure of Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Upon substituting Hg^Ⅱ with Hg^Ⅰ in HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄, along with partial fluorination of the GaO₆ octahedra, a new fluorinated selenite Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F is synthesized. This novel Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F compound crystallizes in the CS I2/a space group. Its asymmetric unit comprises one mercury atom, one selenium atom, one gallium atom, one fluorine atom, and three oxygen atoms, totaling seven atoms. In this structure, gallium and fluorine atoms occupy special positions, each with an occupancy rate of 0.5. The SeO₃ groups maintain their trigonal pyramidal configuration with Se-O bond lengths ranging from 1.706 Å to 1.713 Å. The gallium atom is coordinated with four oxygen atoms and two fluorine atoms, forming an octahedral configuration with Ga-O/F bond lengths between 1.931 Å and 1.967 Å. The mercury atom exists in the form of Hg⁺, manifesting as Hg²⁺, and forms a dumbbell-shaped configuration. Disregarding the longer Hg-O bonds, Hg(1)-Hg(1) is bridged by two oxygen atoms, forming a linear O(1)-Hg(1)-Hg(1)-O(1) group. The bond valences of selenium, mercury, and gallium are calculated to be 3.956, > 0.569, and 2.948, respectively, indicating their oxidation states are + 4, + 1, and + 3.

  Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F exhibits a 3D structure composed of 2D gallium selenite layers and linear Hg₂O₂ units (Fig. 2). In this structure, multiple GaO₄F₂ octahedra share F atoms to form straight chains of gallium octahedra (Fig. S3 in Supporting information). This type of structure has also been observed in our previously reported compound, Pb₂Ga₃F₃(Te₆F₂O₁₆) [36]. The SeO₃ groups bridge these straight chains of gallium octahedra, creating 2D gallium selenite layers (Fig. 2c). The linear Hg₂O₂ units further connect these layers, forming the overall 3D structure of the compound (Fig. 2d).

  Within the temperature range of 20–800 ℃, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted on HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ and Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F. HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ demonstrated good thermal stability up to 300 ℃. Upon reaching 800 ℃, the observed weight loss corresponded to the theoretical loss of 4 molecules of SeO₂ and 1 molecule of HgO. The experimental weight loss was measured at 76.1%, which is very close to the theoretically calculated value of 77.8% (Fig. S4a in Supporting information). As for Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F, it remained stable below 200 ℃. At 800 ℃, the weight loss was primarily attributed to the evaporation of 1 molecule of F, 2 molecules of SeO₂, and 1 molecule of Hg₂O. The experimental weight loss was 88.4%, which matches the theoretical weight loss of 88.5% (Fig. S4b in Supporting information). The thermal stability of Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F is slightly lower than that of HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄, mainly due to the presence of fluorine atoms.

  The infrared (IR) spectra of HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ and Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F were measured at room temperature, covering the wavelength range of 4000–400 cm^-1 (Fig. S5 in Supporting information). No absorption peaks were detected for either compound between 4000 cm^-1 and 900 cm^-1. The absorption peaks observed between 405 cm^-1 and 470 cm^-1, as well as 650 and 850 cm^-1 for both compounds, can be attributed to the characteristic vibrations of the (SeO₃)^2- group. The vibrational peaks corresponding to the Ga-O group are found in the range of 410–530 cm^-1, consistent with values reported in the literature [37-39].

  UV/Vis-NIR absorption spectroscopy analysis shows that the UV cutoff edges of HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ and Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F are approximately 273 nm and 383 nm, respectively, corresponding to band gaps of 4.0 eV and 2.8 eV (Fig. S6 in Supporting information). For HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄, its band gap is larger than those of previously reported mercury-based selenites, such as Ag₄Hg(SeO₃)₂(SeO₄) (3.11 eV) [30], Hg₃Se(SeO₃)(SO₄) (3.58 eV) [39], K₂Hg₂(SeO₃)₃ (3.64 eV) [31], and Hg₂(SeO₃)(SO₄) (3.58 eV) [32]. Meanwhile, the band gap of Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F is comparable to that of previously reported Hg^Ⅰ-based compounds, such as Hg₄(Te₂O₅)(SO₄) (2.85 eV) [27]. The powdered crystals of HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ and Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F exhibit wide transparency ranges, spanning from 0.27 µm to 11.5 µm and 0.38–12.3 µm, respectively. To account for the discrepancies in the IR cutoff edge observed between powder and crystal measurements, which are largely attributed to multiphonon absorption, a 50% correction has been applied [40,41]. With this adjustment, the transparency ranges for HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ and Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F are refined to 0.27–5.8 µm and 0.38–6.2 µm, respectively. These ranges cover crucial atmospheric transparency windows in the MIR region, indicating that these materials are promising candidates MIR birefringent materials.

  Second-harmonic generation (SHG) measurements reveal that HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ particles with ranging from 150 µm to 210 µm can exhibit SHG signals under 1064 nm laser irradiation, which are approximately 60% of that of commercially available KDP (Fig. 3a). Tests with particles of varying sizes demonstrate that the SHG intensity increases with particle size, indicating phase matching (Fig. 3b). Notably, HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ is the first example of a Hg-based simple selenite exhibiting SHG intensity. Structural analysis indicates that the SHG effect primarily stems from the contribution of the SeO₃ groups. It is noteworthy that the SHG effect of HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ is greater than that of the Ag₄Hg(SeO₃)₂(SeO₄) we previously reported (0.35 × KDP) [30], and comparable to that of Cd₃(SeO₃)₂(SeO₄) (0.6 × KDP) and Hg₃(SeO₃)₂(SeO₄) (0.8 × KDP) [42].

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  (a) The oscilloscope traces of the SHG signal, and (b) the measured SHG signals with different particle sizes for HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To gain deeper insights into the electronic properties of HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ and Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F, theoretical calculations were performed using the DFT method for both compounds. As shown in Fig. S7 (Supporting information), both compounds are direct bandgap materials, with calculated bandgaps of 3.022 eV and 2.614 eV, respectively. Due to the limitations of theoretical calculations, the calculated bandgaps are generally smaller than the experimental values [43,44]. Therefore, in the subsequent analysis, scissor corrections of 0.978 eV and 0.186 eV were applied to the two compounds, respectively.

  The total and partial density of states (DOS) for HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ and Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F are shown in Fig. S8 (Supporting information), and both compounds exhibit similar DOS characteristics. The top of the valence bands (VBs) is mainly dominated by O-2p and Se-4p orbitals, while the conduction bands (CBs) close to the Fermi level are primarily composed of Se-4p and Hg-6s states. Therefore, the bandgaps of these compounds are mainly determined by the contributions from Hg, Se, and O atoms.

  The birefringence of these two compounds was calculated based on the formula ε(ω) = ε₁(ω) + iε₂(ω) and n²(ω) = ε(ω). HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ is a uniaxial crystal, where the extraordinary refractive index n_e is greater than the ordinary refractive index n_o. The birefringence (Δn) values for the material are 0.032@546 nm, 0.028@1064 nm and 0.027@2000 nm (Fig. 4a). These values are similar to those observed in Y₃F(SeO₃)₄, which has a birefringence of 0.038@532 nm [18], and in NaGa₃(HSeO₃)₆(SeO₃)₂, with a birefringence of 0.033@532 nm [45]. Additionally, Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F, identified as a biaxial crystal, demonstrates birefringence values of 0.111@546 nm, 0.095@1064 nm and 0.091@2000 nm (Fig. 4b). Fig. 4c and Table S4 (Supporting information) summarized the birefringence data of Hg-based selenites reported in the literature. Notably, Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F shows a large birefringence and is the first example of Hg^Ⅰ-based selenite birefringent material. It is worth mentioning that Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F has a wide transmission window, indicating its potential as a MIR birefringent material.

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  The calculated refractive indices and birefringence values of (a) HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ and (b) Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F. (c) The birefringence of the reported Hg-based selenite crystals.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Compared to HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄, the birefringence of Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F has been enhanced by 3.5 times. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the reasons behind the differences in birefringence between these two compounds. For HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄, its smaller birefringence is mainly due to the following factors: As shown in Figs. 5a and b and Table S2 (Supporting information), the highly symmetrical configurations of the GaO₆ octahedron and HgO₄ square contribute almost nothing to the birefringence. Although the lone pair electrons in the SeO₃ group have a positive effect on birefringence, the SeO₃ group is connected to six oxygen atoms in the highly symmetrical GaO₆ octahedron (Fig. 5a). This causes the lone pair electrons to be arranged in different directions, resulting in the birefringence canceling out, thus leading to a smaller overall birefringence in this compound. For Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F, its large birefringence is mainly attributed to the introduction of the linear Hg₂O₂ group. Compared to the planar HgO₄ square, the Hg₂O₂ group exhibits more large anisotropy, and in this structure, the linear Hg₂O₂ groups are arranged in an orderly manner along the same direction. Additionally, due to the "chemical scissor" effect of fluorine atoms [46], partial fluorination of the GaO₆ octahedra prevents the anisotropy of the SeO₃ groups from canceling each other out. According to literature, for linear groups, the direction of maximum refractive index is parallel to the linear structure of the molecule, while for lone-pair electron groups, the direction of maximum refractive index is perpendicular to the orientation of the lone pair, which usually points toward the direction of minimum refractive index [47]. As shown in Figs. 5c and d, the synergistic effect between the linear Hg₂O₂ group and the lone-pair SeO₃ group results in the large birefringence observed in this compound.

  Figure 5

  

  Figure 5.  (a, b) The schematic diagram illustrating the cancellation of effects in HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄. (c, d) The Schematic diagram of the synergistic effect in Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In summary, two new selenite compounds, HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ and Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F, were successfully synthesized in the Hg-based selenite system using a mild hydrothermal method. HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ crystallizes in a NCS space group and represents the first example of a Hg-based simple selenite with SHG intensity. It exhibits 60% of the SHG intensity of commercial KDP, along with good stability, a large bandgap (4.0 eV), and a broad transmission window (0.27–5.8 µm). Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F represents the first Hg^Ⅰ-based selenite birefringent material, showing a large birefringence (0.111@546 nm) and wide transmission window (0.38–6.2 µm), making it a promising candidate for birefringent applications. Structural analysis reveals that the large birefringence of Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F arises from the synergistic effect of the linear Hg₂O₂ and SeO₃ groups. Our work presents a novel approach for designing new birefringent materials. Next, we will conduct a more systematic investigation of the Hg^Ⅰ-based selenite system.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  CRediT authorship contribution statement

  Peng-Fei Li: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Chun-Li Hu: Software, Methodology. Bo Zhang: Data curation. Jiang-Gao Mao: Supervision, Resources, Funding acquisition. Fang Kong: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Funding acquisition.

  Acknowledgments

  This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22475215, 22031009 and 21921001), the NSF of Fujian Province (Nos. 2023J01216, 2024J010039) and the Self-deployment Project Research Program of Haixi Institutes, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. CXZX-2022-GH06).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110588.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     H.Y. Sha, Y.R. Shang, Z.J. Wang, et al., Small 20 (2023) e2309776.

  2. [2]

     J. Chen, M.B. Xu, H.Y. Wu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63 (2024) e202411503. doi: 10.1002/anie.202411503

  3. [3]

     H. Sha, D. Yang, Y. Shang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 36 (2025) 109730. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109730

  4. [4]

     M. Ma, J. Dang, Y. Wu, et al., Inorg. Chem. 62 (2023) 6549–6553. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00683

  5. [5]

     G. Ghosh, Opt. Commun. 163 (1999) 95–102. doi: 10.1016/S0030-4018(99)00091-7

  6. [6]

     H.T. Luo, T. Tkaczyk, E.L. Dereniak, et al., Opt. Lett. 31 (2006) 616–618. doi: 10.1364/OL.31.000616

  7. [7]

     M.J. Dodge, Appl. Opt. 23 (1984) 1980–1985. doi: 10.1364/AO.23.001980

  8. [8]

     J.R. DeVore, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 41 (1951) 416–419. doi: 10.1364/JOSA.41.000416

  9. [9]

     D.E. Zelmon, D.L. Small, D. Jundt, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 14 (1997) 3319–3322. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.14.003319

  10. [10]

      S.J. Han, A. Tudi, W.B. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202302025. doi: 10.1002/anie.202302025

  11. [11]

      Y. Lan, J. Ren, P. Zhang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 108652. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108652

  12. [12]

      D. Yan, M.M. Ren, Q. Liu, et al., Inorg. Chem. 62 (2023) 4757–4761. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00556

  13. [13]

      Z. Hu, L. Liu, R. Zhang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 11 (2023) 3325–3333. doi: 10.1039/d2tc05374h

  14. [14]

      B. Zhang, M.Y. Ran, X.T. Wu, et al., Coord. Chem. Rev. 517 (2024) 216053. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216053

  15. [15]

      X.H. Dong, H.B. Huang, L. Huang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63 (2024) e202318976. doi: 10.1002/anie.202318976

  16. [16]

      M.B. Xu, Q.Q. Chen, B.X. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 36 (2025) 110513. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110513

  17. [17]

      M. Hu, C. Tu, Z. Yang, et al., Scripta Mater 231 (2023) 115437. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115437

  18. [18]

      P.F. Li, C.L. Hu, F. Kong, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202301420. doi: 10.1002/anie.202301420

  19. [19]

      J. Chen, K.Z. Du, Inorg. Chem. 61 (2022) 17893–17901. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03267

  20. [20]

      S. Yang, H. Wu, Z. Hu, et al., Small 20 (2023) 2306459.

  21. [21]

      Y. Li, K.M. Ok, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63 (2024) e202409336. doi: 10.1002/anie.202409336

  22. [22]

      J. Zhou, Z. Fan, K. Zhang, et al., Mater. Horiz. 10 (2023) 619–624. doi: 10.1039/d2mh01200f

  23. [23]

      R.L. Tang, M. Yan, W.D. Yao, et al., Inorg. Chem. 61 (2022) 2333–2339. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03737

  24. [24]

      H.Y. Wu, C.L. Hu, M.B. Xu, et al., Chem. Sci. 14 (2023) 9533–9542. doi: 10.1039/d3sc03052k

  25. [25]

      X. Liu, L. Kang, P. Gong, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 13574–13578. doi: 10.1002/anie.202101308

  26. [26]

      P.F. Li, C.L. Hu, J.G. Mao, et al., Laser Photonics Rev. 19 (2025) 2401488. doi: 10.1002/lpor.202401488

  27. [27]

      P.F. Li, C.L. Hu, Y.F. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 7868–7874. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c01740

  28. [28]

      J. Ren, Y. Chen, L. Ren, et al., Inorg. Chem. 62 (2023) 9130–9138. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00986

  29. [29]

      M.Y. Ran, S.H. Zhou, W.B. Wei, et al., Small 20 (2024) 2304563. doi: 10.1002/smll.202304563

  30. [30]

      X.X. Wang, X.B. Li, C.L. Hu, et al., Sci. China Mater. 62 (2019) 1821–1830. doi: 10.1007/s40843-019-1193-x

  31. [31]

      J. Ren, H. Cui, L. Cheng, et al., Inorg. Chem. 62 (2023) 21173–21180. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c03136

  32. [32]

      P.F. Li, C.L. Hu, F. Kong, et al., Mater. Chem. Front. 6 (2022) 3567–3576. doi: 10.1039/d2qm00773h

  33. [33]

      J. Chen, C. Lin, X. Jiang, et al., Mater. Horiz. 10 (2023) 2876–2882. doi: 10.1039/d3mh00257h

  34. [34]

      Y.L. Sun, L. Huai, A.H. Gong, J. Solid State Chem. 336 (2024) 124772. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2024.124772

  35. [35]

      Z. Yan, J. Fan, S. Pan, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 53 (2024) 6568–6599. doi: 10.1039/d3cs01136d

  36. [36]

      P.F. Li, J.G. Mao, F. Kong, Mater. Today Phys. 37 (2023) 101197. doi: 10.1016/j.mtphys.2023.101197

  37. [37]

      J. Zhang, H. Yu, Z. Hu, et al., Mater. Today Phys. 35 (2023) 101145. doi: 10.1016/j.mtphys.2023.101145

  38. [38]

      G. Park, K.M. Ok, Inorg. Chem. Front. 7 (2020) 4469–4476. doi: 10.1039/d0qi01056a

  39. [39]

      P.F. Li, C.L. Hu, B.X. Li, et al., Inorg. Chem. 63 (2024) 4011–4016. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c00033

  40. [40]

      P.F. Li, C.L. Hu, B.X. Li, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front. 10 (2023) 7343–7350. doi: 10.1039/d3qi01937c

  41. [41]

      Z. Yang, C. Hu, M. Mutailipu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 6 (2018) 2435–2442. doi: 10.1039/c7tc04857b

  42. [42]

      M. Shang, P.S. Halasyamani, J. Solid State Chem. 286 (2020) 121292. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2020.121292

  43. [43]

      M. Yan, R.L. Tang, W.D. Yao, et al., Chem. Sci. 15 (2024) 2883–2888. doi: 10.1039/d3sc06683e

  44. [44]

      M.Y. Ran, S.H. Zhou, X.T. Wu, et al., Mater. Today Phys. 44 (2024) 101442. doi: 10.1016/j.mtphys.2024.101442

  45. [45]

      P.F. Li, C.L. Hu, J.G. Mao, et al., Coord. Chem. Rev. 517 (2024) 216000. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216000

  46. [46]

      P.F. Li, C.L. Hu, J.G. Mao, et al., Chem. Sci. 15 (2024) 7104–7110. doi: 10.1039/d4sc01376j

  47. [47]

      J.Y. Guo, A. Tudi, S.J. Han, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 3540–3544. doi: 10.1002/anie.202014279

• 

  Figure 1  Design roadmap for Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  (a) The 3D mercury selenate structure, (b) 3D structure of HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄. (c) The 2D gallium selenite layered structure and (d) 3D structure of Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  (a) The oscilloscope traces of the SHG signal, and (b) the measured SHG signals with different particle sizes for HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  The calculated refractive indices and birefringence values of (a) HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄ and (b) Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F. (c) The birefringence of the reported Hg-based selenite crystals.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 5  (a, b) The schematic diagram illustrating the cancellation of effects in HgGa₂(SeO₃)₄. (c, d) The Schematic diagram of the synergistic effect in Hg₂Ga(SeO₃)₂F.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
•