Palladium-catalyzed base- and solvent-controlled chemoselective allylation of amino acids with allylic carbonates

Yang Zhou Hang Chen Panpan Lei Chunming Gui Haifeng Wang Qiongjiao Yan Wei Wang Fener Chen

Citation:  Yang Zhou, Hang Chen, Panpan Lei, Chunming Gui, Haifeng Wang, Qiongjiao Yan, Wei Wang, Fener Chen. Palladium-catalyzed base- and solvent-controlled chemoselective allylation of amino acids with allylic carbonates[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022, 33(11): 4850-4855. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.02.029 shu

Palladium-catalyzed base- and solvent-controlled chemoselective allylation of amino acids with allylic carbonates

English

  • Amino acids represent a ubiquitous motif found in natural products and pharmaceuticals [1, 2]. They have been involved in a variety of chemical transformations, especially for the synthesis of artificial amino acids, short peptides and polypeptides with specific biological activities, semi-synthetic antibiotics, new herbicide, and insecticide [3-9]. In most cases, these bifunctional substrates have to be protected, either at the amino or at the carboxylic end to ensure selective transformations. For example, amino acid esters have been already widely used in α-alkylation due to the O-protection of the carboxylic group as an easily removable protecting group. In recent years, transition-metal-catalyzed enantioselective α-allylation of amino acid ester derivatives has received increasing attention because of the exceptional importance of α,α-disubstituted α-amino acids in biological processes; this has been demonstrated by the development of novel nucleophiles (N-unprotected and N,N-disubstituted amino acid esters, aldimine esters, ketimine esters, etc.) [10-15], electrophiles (allylic substrates, vinyl-cyclopropanes, 1,3-dienes, etc.) [16-19], and even highly efficient catalytic systems (Scheme 1a) [20-22]. However, despite the notable impressive progress achieved in this area of α-allylation, we were surprised to learn that only few examples have been reported for the asymmetric N-allylation of amino acid esters [23-29]. As shown in Scheme 1b, Schmalz and co-works disclosed the stereocontrolled palladium-catalyzed N-allylation of amino acid esters, giving the correspongding N-allylation products with excellent enantio– and diastereoselectivity [28, 29]. Although the solubility and selectivity increase via the O-protection of the carboxylic group on amino acid, protection may also cause some problems, e.g., increasing the number of synthetic steps and difficulty in deprotecting unstable compounds. Therefore, the development of the direct functionalization of amino acids is greatly required in organic synthesis.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Development of allylic substitution of amino acid esters and amino acids.

    As a matter of fact, compared to amino acid ester as a nucleophile, amino acid contains either N or O reactive sites, which is not only an oxygen nucleophile but also a nitrogen nucleophile (Scheme 1c). Thus, transition-metal-catalyzed N,O-selective allylic substitution of amino acids remains a challenge [30-33]. The major challenge in N,O-selective allylation is to control the competition between a nitrogen nucleophile and an oxygen nucleophile on amino acid. What is more, there is still only a very limited number of reports documented in the literature that a carboxy group serves as the nucleophile to afford allyl esters [34-45], probably because of the high reactivity of the resulting allylic esters with metal catalysts. Therefore, we were challenged to develop an efficient methodology for such reactions.

    Herein we report the first palladium-catalyzed chemoselective allylic substitution with amino acids as N- and O-nucleophiles (Scheme 1c). In this context, chemoselectivity for the allylation can be exclusively driven by adjusting the bases and solvents. This new strategy would provide a general and efficient approach to valuable allylated amino acid derivatives.

    Our investigation into Pd-catalyzed selective allylic esterifications and aminations began with the evaluation of ligands for coupling racemic N-tosyl–tert-butylglycine 1a and (E)-cinnamyl methyl carbonate 2a. Initially, this reaction was conducted in the presence of 2.5 mol% of Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 and 6 mol% of ligand L1 (BINAP). The N,O-diallylated product 4aa was generated in 35% yield (Table 1, entry 1). To our delight, replacing BINAP with ligand L2 (Xantphos) gave a substantially improved reaction efficiency (Table 1, entry 2, 86%). Encouraged by this result, a series of phosphine ligands with different bite angles and electronic natures were screened to identify ligands that would improve the reaction activity and selectivity (Table 1, entries 3 and 4, and Table S1 in Supporting information). As a result, Xantphos still turned out to be far superior. These couplings were all screened using Xantphos as the ligand of choice on palladium, which revealed that only Pd(PPh3)Cl2 was suitable (Table 1, entries 5–7 and Table S1). Further screening of the reaction conditions revealed that CH3CN served as the best solvent compared with DCM, 1, 4-dioxane, DMF, toluene, EtOAc, THF, DMSO, NMP or CH3OH (Table 1, entries 8–11 and Table S2 in Supporting information). Increasing the amount of catalyst loading and carbonate reagent led to a higher (94%) yield of 4aa (Table 1, entry 12).

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Optimization of reaction conditions for racemic N-tosyl–tert-butylglycine and cinnamyl methyl carbonate 2a as substrates.a
    DownLoad: CSV

    Interestingly, this reaction performed in EtOAc gave the allylic esterification product 3aa, though with only a 13% yield, which suggested that the selective allylation of N-nucleophile or O-nucleophile on tert–butylglycine was possible by controlling the reaction conditions (Table 1, entry 11). Indeed, conducting the reaction under an atmosphere of air or oxygen led to a remarkable increase in yield of the desired O-allylated product 3aa (Table 1, entries 13 and 14, 78% and 55%). Gratifyingly, using CH3CN as the reaction medium, conversion of N-Ts tert–butylglycine 1a with carbonate 2a under an O2 atmosphere resulted in an outstanding yield (entry 15, O2, 3aa, 99% vs. entry 12, Ar, 4aa, 94%). As a Pd-catalyzed allylic C—H acetoxylation [46-48], the beneficial effect of molecular oxygen on the O-allylation reflects its ability to enhance the rate by trapping the putative Pd(0)-alkene species and promote C—O reductive elimination from π-allyl-Pd(Ⅱ) complexes. More importantly, a peroxo-Pd intermediate could be detected by ESI-HRMS under an atmosphere of ambient O2 (Fig. S2 in Supporting information for details), which indicated that molecular oxygen may just kill the catalyst in time to prevent the N-allylation. Finally, a variety of organic and inorganic bases were screened and NaOMe proved to be the best one for the O-allylation product 3aa (Table 1, entries 16–19 and Table S3 in Supporting information). These findings clearly showcase that (a) the allylic substitution favors the O-nucleophile more than the N-nucleophile on amino acids [49] and (b) N-allylic alkylation of amino acids could be suppressed when NaOMe and EtOAc were used as the base and solvent or under an O2 atmosphere. When the Ts group was changed to Ac or H, poor results were delivered and only trace amounts of 3aa were obtained.

    With the optimal conditions established, we first reacted a representative set of allylic carbonates 2 with N-tosyl–tert-butylglycine 1a to explore the generality of this reaction. It is noteworthy that O-allylic alkylation of tert–butylglycine was executed under the reaction conditions presented in entry 15 (Conditions B) or 19 (Conditions A) of Table 1. As summarized in Scheme 2, this transformation demonstrated a broad scope with respect to the allylic carbonate reaction partner under both reaction conditions and the corresponding O-allylated products 3aa-3at were obtained with excellent chemoselectivity of up to 94%. The molecular structure of 3aa was unambiguously confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis (CCDC: 2095785). An array of cinnamyl carbonates 2b-2k bearing either an electron-donating (e.g., MeO, Me, OCF3) or an electron-withdrawing (e.g., Cl, Br, CF3) group at the phenyl ring were all suitable for the reaction, and afforded the desired allylic esters 3ab-3ak in 58%−93% yields. Notably, the m-nitro-substituted carbonate was also tolerated and furnished the corresponding product 3al in 75% yield. The presence of para (3ab, 3af, 3ag, and 3ak), meta (3ac, 3ae, 3ah, 3aj, and 3al), or ortho (3ad and 3ai) substitutions on the aryl group proved to be feasible. Furthermore, the substrates 2m-2o with 3, 4-di-MeO groups or a bulky fused aryl ring on the phenyl also worked well in this reaction and gave the desired allylic esters 3am-3ao in 65%−74% yields. Importantly, the reactions of 2-thienyl-, 2-furyl-substituted substrates 2p and 2q all proceeded smoothly to provide the products 3ap-3aq in 66% and 75% yields, respectively. Meanwhile, we were pleased to find that our method can also be applied to alkyl carbonates (3ar and 3as, 68% and 55%). Remarkably, 1,3-disubstituted allyl carbonate 2t reacted smoothly toward the corresponding O-allylic product 3at in 58% yield. It is interesting to note that in most cases these two conditions could be complemented each other toward the O-allylic substitution of tert–butylglycine. Subsequently, we focused on the simultaneous construction of C—O and C—N bonds under optimal conditions of N,O-diallylic substitutions (Table 1, entry 12, Conditions C). The allylation reactions of the carbonates with alkoxy, halogen, trifluoromethyl, and 1,3-benzodioxole groups were successful, producing densely functionalized N,O-diallylated products 4aa-4ao in 61%–90% yields. What is more, heterocyclic aromatic substrates could also react smoothly with tert–butylglycine 1a to give the expected products 4ap and 4aq in 64% and 47% yields, respectively. In addition, the reaction using 3-alkyl-allyl carbonate provided 4as in moderate yield.

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2.  Scope of the allylic methyl carbonate coupling partner with racemic tert–butylglycine. For reaction conditions of O-allylation see entries 19 and 15 in Table 1; N,O-diallylation see entry 12 in Table 1.

    Encouraged by these results, we turned our attention to the investigation of the amino acids scope (Table S5 in Supporting information). Frustratingly, it was found that the optimized protocol of the O-allylation (Table 1, entry 19, Conditions A) proved to be ineffective for the N-Ts valine and a poor yield of the desired allylic ester 3ba was obtained (Table S5, entry 1, 28%). To enhance the activity and selectivity of this reaction, some key factors affecting the performance of this transformation are explored. The best reaction conditions were found with a simple pyridyl-derived phosphine L12 as a ligand when reducing the amount of the base (Table S5, entries 11 and 13). To probe the applicability of the developed protocol, the cinnamyl methyl carbonate 2a was reacted with a set of racemic N-Ts-protected α-amino acids 1. The results summarized in Scheme 3 show that outstanding chemoselectivities and isolated yields were observed in most cases, independent of the amino acid sidechain. A series of valuable O-allylated and N,O-diallylated amino acid derivatives were finally gained in moderate to good yields (3ba-3ma, 32%−88%; 4ba, 4ea-4ga, 4ia, 4ja, 4ma, 41%−92%). The molecular structure of N,O-diallylated product 4ia was established by X-ray crystallographic analysis. Notably, this transformation was found to be compatible with a series of β- and γ-amino acids with excellent selectivity for O-allylation and N,O-diallylation (3na-3qa, 47%−60%; 4na-4qa, 69%−82%). Besides, dipeptide also gave the corresponding products 3ra and 4ra.

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3.  Scope of the racemic amino acid coupling partner with cinnamyl methyl carbonate. For reaction conditions of O-allylation see Table S5, entry 11 and N,O-diallylation see Table S5, entry 13.

    To further demonstrate the potential applications of this protocol, methyl carbonate 2a was reacted with non-racemic amino acids such as N-Ts-d–tert-butylglycine and N-Ts-l-valine, upon which the desired non-racemic allylic amino acid esters (R)−3aa, (R)−4aa, and (S)−3ba were isolated in high yields and without any detectable loss of absolute stereochemical information (Scheme 4a). Furthermore, the N,O-selective allylic reactions could be easily performed on 1 mmol scale (Schemes 4b and c, 72% and 70%). The application of these allylic amino acids generated by this method is demonstrated in Scheme 4. For example, further transformation of 3aa was realized by treatment with I2 and NaHCO3 in CH3CN, providing the synthetically valuable morpholin-2-one 5 in 54% yield with 1:1 dr (Scheme 4b). Interestingly, product E,E-4aa could undergo an isomerization [50], using our previously reported method of a photocatalytic E to Z isomerization [51] to deliver the Z,Z-isomer in high yield (Scheme 4c, Z,Z-4aa, 95%). More importantly, product 4aa could also be conveniently transformed into N-allylated amino acid 6 with a good yield upon acidic hydrolysis (Scheme 4c, 78%). So far, three N,O-selective allylation products (O-allylated, N-allylated, and N,O-diallylated) were obtained through the base and solvent-controlled N,O-selective allylation of amino acids. This method provides a new way for the selective modification of amino acids.

    Scheme 4

    Scheme 4.  Scale-up synthesis and synthetic applications.

    To gain insight into the reaction pathway, we examined the reaction processes of O-allylic and N,O-diallylic substitutions by 1H NMR spectroscopy of the crude reaction mixtures (Fig. 1 and Fig. S1 in Supporting information). As illustrated in Fig. 1, the 1HNMR spectra of reaction time clearly show the formation of the desired products 3aa and 4aa under the optimized reaction conditions. The reaction of 1a with 2a gave the O-allylated amino acid 3aa under the conditions A after 5 h, and the 1H NMR spectrum showed two doublets at δ 6.53, J = 15.8 Hz and δ 5.18, J = 10.8 Hz, and doublet of triplet at δ 6.02, J = 15.9, 6.7 Hz (Fig. 1, Ⅰ-c). The product 4aa was not observed even extending the allylation time to 48 h. It is important to note that a mixture of 1a and 2a followed by Pd-catalyzed allylation under the conditions C after 1 h afforded 3aa in a good yield, along with a trace amount of 4aa (Fig. 1, Ⅱ-a). As the reaction progress, N,O-diallylated amino acid 4aa content increased, while O-allylated product 3aa content in the reaction mixture decreased gradually (Fig. 1, Ⅱ-b-d). These results indicates that the transformation of 3aa into 4aa could be crucial for the N,O-diallylic substitution. In addition, as the effect of molecular oxygen, the conversion of 3aa into 4aa was suppressed in the presence of water (Table S4 in Supporting information).

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  1H NMR Spectra (CDCl3, 400 MHz); Ⅰ: performed from 1a (0.1 mmol), 2a (0.15 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (4 mol%), L2 (10 mol%), and NaOMe (0.05 mmol) in EtOAc (1 mL) at room temperature; Ⅱ: 1a (0.1 mmol), 2a (0.22 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (4 mol%), XantPhos (10 mol%), and Cs2CO3 (0.05 mmol) in CH3CN (1 mL) at room temperature.

    On the basis of these results, a plausible mechanism for the Pd-catalyzed chemoselective allylation of amino acids is shown in Scheme 5. Similar to other allylic substitutions, oxidative addition of an allylic carbonate (1a) to Pd(0) gives a Pd-π-allyl species 7. Subsequently, the intermediate 7 underwent esterification with amino acid 1a to form the desired product 3aa and Pd(0). The O-allylation generated product 3aa which underwent N-allylation via the N-nucleophilic attack to the intermediate 7, thus forming a new C—N bond and the final N,O-diallylated product 4aa. When NaOMe and EtOAc are used as the base and solvent, or conducting the reaction under an O2 atmosphere or with extra water, the catalytic cycle of N-allylation is interrupted and the intermediate 9 is not formed during this catalysis.

    Scheme 5

    Scheme 5.  Proposed mechanism for Pd-catalyzed selective allylic esterification and amination of amino acids.

    In conclusion, we have developed the first example of Pd-catalyzed chemoselective allylic alkylation of amino acids with allylic carbonates. The protocol provides a general and efficient approach to various important O-allylated, N-allylated, and N,O-diallylated amino acid derivatives. The simplicity and availability of the amino acid nucleophile, the mild reaction conditions, and the broad scope of the allylic carbonates are the attributes of the present system. We anticipate additional applications of this strategy for catalytic asymmetric carbon-oxygen and carbon-nitrogen bond formations.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    We acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21602144), the Science and Technology Program of Sichuan Province (No. 2018JY0485), and Scientific Research Project of Education Department of Hubei Province (Nos. Q20211503, B2020057).

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.02.029.


    1. [1]

      Y. Asano, Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 83 (2019) 1402–1416. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2018.1559027

    2. [2]

      J.F. Hyslop, S.L. Lovelock, A.J.B. Watson, P.W. Sutton, G.D. Roiban, J. Biotechnol. 293 (2019) 56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.01.006

    3. [3]

      M.S. Stanley, J. Org. Chem. 57 (1992) 6421–6430. doi: 10.1021/jo00050a013

    4. [4]

      M. Goodman, H. Shao, Pure Appl. Chem. 68 (1996) 1303–1308. doi: 10.1351/pac199668061303

    5. [5]

      D.R. Goode, A.K. Sharma, P.J. Hergenrother, Org. Lett. 7 (2005) 3529–3532. doi: 10.1021/ol051287d

    6. [6]

      D.J. Craik, Science 311 (2006) 1563–1564. doi: 10.1126/science.1125248

    7. [7]

      A. Patgiri, A.L. Jochim, P.S. Arora, Acc. Chem. Res. 41 (2008) 1289–1300. doi: 10.1021/ar700264k

    8. [8]

      R. Chapman, M. Danial, M.L. Koh, K.A. Jolliffe, S. Perrier, Chem. Soc. Rev. 41 (2012) 6023–6041. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35172b

    9. [9]

      A.A. Bowers, Medchemcomm 3 (2012) 905–915. doi: 10.1039/C2MD20068F

    10. [10]

      S.S.M. Spoehrle, T.H. West, J.E. Taylor, A.M.Z. Slawin, A.D. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 11895–11902. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b05619

    11. [11]

      L. Wei, L. Xiao, C.J. Wang, Adv. Synth. Catal. 360 (2018) 4715–4719. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201800986

    12. [12]

      L. Chen, M.J. Luo, F. Zhu, W. Wen, Q.X. Guo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 5159–5163. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b01910

    13. [13]

      W. Wang, Q. Xiong, L. Gong, et al., Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 5479–5485. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01836

    14. [14]

      R. He, X. Huo, L. Zhao, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 8097–8103. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c02150

    15. [15]

      Z.D. Mou, X. Zhang, D. Niu, Green Syn. Catal. 2 (2021) 70–73. doi: 10.1016/j.gresc.2021.01.001

    16. [16]

      J. Wang, Z. Dai, C. Xiong, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 361 (2019) 5105–5111. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201901031

    17. [17]

      Q. Zhang, H. Yu, L. Shen, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 14554–14559. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b07600

    18. [18]

      M. Ke, Z. Liu, G. Huang, et al., Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 4135–4140. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01211

    19. [19]

      T.J. Fulton, A.Q. Cusumano, E.J. Alexy, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 21938–21947. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c11480

    20. [20]

      J.H. Kim, Y. Chung, H. Jeon, S. Lee, S. Kim, Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 3989–3992. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01307

    21. [21]

      W.J. Chiu, J.Y. Chen, S.I. Liu, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 363 (2021) 2834–2842. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202001576

    22. [22]

      M. Ke, Z. Liu, K. Zhang, S. Zuo, F. Chen, Green Syn. Catal. 2 (2021) 228–232. doi: 10.1016/j.gresc.2021.04.004

    23. [23]

      M.E. Humphries, B.P. Clark, J.M.J. Williams, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 9 (1998) 749–751. doi: 10.1016/S0957-4166(98)00060-3

    24. [24]

      B.M. Trost, T.L. Calkins, C. Oertelt, J. Zambrano, Tetrahedron Lett. 39 (1998) 1713–1716. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(98)00139-7

    25. [25]

      Y. Hamada, N. Seto, Y. Takayanagi, T. Nakano, O. Hara, Tetrahedron Lett. 40 (1999) 7791–7794. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(99)01617-2

    26. [26]

      M.E. Humphries, B.P. Clark, S. Regini, L. Acemoglu, J.M.J. Williams, Chirality 15 (2003) 190–195. doi: 10.1002/chir.10173

    27. [27]

      P. Tosatti, J. Horn, A.J. Campbell, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 352 (2010) 3153–3157. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201000721

    28. [28]

      S. Dohmen, M. Reiher, D. Albat, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 26 (2020) 3049–3053. doi: 10.1002/chem.202000307

    29. [29]

      D. Albat, J.M. Neudörfl, H.G. Schmalz, Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2021) 2099–2102 2021.

    30. [30]

      B. Sundararaju, M. Achard, G.V.M. Sharma, C. Bruneau, Org. Biomol. Chem. 7 (2009) 3906–3909. doi: 10.1039/b911097f

    31. [31]

      H. Hikawa, Y. Yokoyama, J. Org. Chem. 76 (2011) 8433–8439. doi: 10.1021/jo201691e

    32. [32]

      H. Hikawa, Y. Yokoyama, Org. Biomol. Chem. 9 (2011) 4044–4050. doi: 10.1039/c1ob05238a

    33. [33]

      X.H. Kang, C. Qian. H. Yang, et al., Green Syn. Catal. 3 (2022) 185–189. doi: 10.1016/j.gresc.2022.01.002

    34. [34]

      B.M. Trost, M.G. Organ, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116 (1994) 10320–10321. doi: 10.1021/ja00101a070

    35. [35]

      S.F. Kirsch, L.E. Overman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 2866–2867. doi: 10.1021/ja0425583

    36. [36]

      A.C. Olson, L.E. Overman, H.F. Sneddon, J.W. Ziller, Adv. Synth. Catal. 351 (2009) 3186–3192. doi: 10.1002/adsc.200900678

    37. [37]

      N. Kanbayashi, K. Onitsuka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (2010) 1206–1207. doi: 10.1021/ja908456b

    38. [38]

      J.S. Cannon, S.F. Kirsch, L.E. Overman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (2010) 15185–15191. doi: 10.1021/ja106685w

    39. [39]

      K. Takenaka, M. Akita, Y. Tanigaki, S. Takizawa, H. Sasai, Org. Lett. 13 (2011) 3506–3509. doi: 10.1021/ol201314m

    40. [40]

      N. Kanbayashi, K. Onitsuka, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50 (2011) 5197–5199. doi: 10.1002/anie.201101078

    41. [41]

      Y. Wang, Q. Kang, Org. Lett. 16 (2014) 4190–4193. doi: 10.1021/ol501887a

    42. [42]

      J. Qu, L. Roßberg, G. Helmchen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 1272–1275. doi: 10.1021/ja411869r

    43. [43]

      B. Feng, H.G. Cheng, J.R. Chen, et al., Chem. Commun. 50 (2014) 9550–9553. doi: 10.1039/C4CC03920C

    44. [44]

      W. Yang, H. Chen, J. Li, et al., Chem. Commun. 51 (2015) 9575–9578. doi: 10.1039/C5CC02277K

    45. [45]

      Y. Suzuki, T. Seki, S. Tanaka, M. Kitamura, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 9539–9542. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b05786

    46. [46]

      A.N. Campbell, P.B. White, I.A. Guzei, S.S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (2010) 15116–15119. doi: 10.1021/ja105829t

    47. [47]

      T. Diao, S.S. Stahl, Polyhedron 84 (2014) 96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2014.06.038

    48. [48]

      C.V. Kozack, S.J. Tereniak, J.N. Jaworski, et al., ACS Catal. 11 (2021) 6363–6370. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c01074

    49. [49]

      A. Lumbroso, P. Koschker, N.R. Vautravers, B. Breit, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 2386–2389. doi: 10.1021/ja1108613

    50. [50]

      K. Singh, S.J. Staig, J.D. Weaver, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 5275–5278. doi: 10.1021/ja5019749

    51. [51]

      H. Li, H. Chen, Y. Zhou, et al., Chem. Asian J. 15 (2020) 555–559. doi: 10.1002/asia.201901778

  • Scheme 1  Development of allylic substitution of amino acid esters and amino acids.

    Scheme 2  Scope of the allylic methyl carbonate coupling partner with racemic tert–butylglycine. For reaction conditions of O-allylation see entries 19 and 15 in Table 1; N,O-diallylation see entry 12 in Table 1.

    Scheme 3  Scope of the racemic amino acid coupling partner with cinnamyl methyl carbonate. For reaction conditions of O-allylation see Table S5, entry 11 and N,O-diallylation see Table S5, entry 13.

    Scheme 4  Scale-up synthesis and synthetic applications.

    Figure 1  1H NMR Spectra (CDCl3, 400 MHz); Ⅰ: performed from 1a (0.1 mmol), 2a (0.15 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (4 mol%), L2 (10 mol%), and NaOMe (0.05 mmol) in EtOAc (1 mL) at room temperature; Ⅱ: 1a (0.1 mmol), 2a (0.22 mmol), Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (4 mol%), XantPhos (10 mol%), and Cs2CO3 (0.05 mmol) in CH3CN (1 mL) at room temperature.

    Scheme 5  Proposed mechanism for Pd-catalyzed selective allylic esterification and amination of amino acids.

    Table 1.  Optimization of reaction conditions for racemic N-tosyl–tert-butylglycine and cinnamyl methyl carbonate 2a as substrates.a

    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  12
  • 文章访问数:  1383
  • HTML全文浏览量:  117
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2022-11-15
  • 收稿日期:  2021-12-22
  • 接受日期:  2022-02-14
  • 修回日期:  2022-02-11
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-02-18
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章