Iron-catalyzed cyanoalkylation of difluoroenol silyl ethers with cyclobutanone oxime esters

Citation: Xiaolei Zhu, Yangen Huang, Xiuhua Xu, Fengling Qing. Iron-catalyzed cyanoalkylation of difluoroenol silyl ethers with cyclobutanone oxime esters[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022, 33(2): 817-820. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.030 shu

Iron-catalyzed cyanoalkylation of difluoroenol silyl ethers with cyclobutanone oxime esters

English

Iron-catalyzed cyanoalkylation of difluoroenol silyl ethers with cyclobutanone oxime esters

a.
College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
b.
Key Laboratory of Organofluorine Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai 200032, China
^* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: xuxiuhua@sioc.ac.cn (X. Xu)
flq@mail.sioc.ac.cn (F. Qing).
Received Date: 05 May 2021
Accepted Date: 30 July 2021
Revised Date: 06 July 2021
Available Online: 15 February 2022

Abstract: An iron-catalyzed coupling reaction of difluoroenol silyl ethers and cyclobutanone oxime esters is described. This protocol provides a convenient access to various previously unknown and potentially useful gem-difluoromethylenated ketonitriles inmoderate to good yields. The transformations of resulting products to other fluorinecontaining products is also documented.

Key words:

The introduction of a gem-difluoromethylene (CF₂) unit into organic molecules often dramatically perturbs their physical, chemical and biological properties [1-3]. For instance, when the CF₂ group was introduced adjacent to the carbonyl functionality, the electrophilicity of the carbonyl carbon atom is sharply increased. This causes not only changes in reactivity but in biological activity as well. It is well known that α,α-difluoroketones tend to exist in hydrated form and mimic closely the tetrahedral transition state, which has been applied in the development of enzyme inhibitors (Fig. 1.) [4,5]. Furthermore, α,α-difluoroketones are valuable building blocks for the preparation of various useful fluorine-containing compounds [6-9].

Figure 1

Figure 1. Representative bioactive α, α-difluoroketones.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Over the past decades, promising strategies have been reported for the synthesis of α,α-difluoroketones, mainly including fluorination of ketones [10-14], oxidation of α,α-difluoroalcohols [15-19], and transformation of difluorocarbonyl synthons [20-24]. The fluorination methods have some drawbacks such as poor functional compatibility, whereas oxidation protocol always requires prefunctionalized substrates. In contrast, with the increasing accessibility of difluorocarbonyl synthons, considerable efforts have been devoted to their conversions to α,α-difluoroketones. Among the difluorocarbonyl synthons, difluoroenol silyl ethers have recently received much attentions due to their versatile reactivity [25,26]. They are easily prepared from trifluoromethylketones by Mg-mediated cleavage of one of the C−F bonds [27,28]. The standard reactions of difluoroenol silyl ethers involve nucleophilic addition to unsaturated substrates (Scheme 1a) [29-33] and substitution of electrophiles (Scheme 1b) [34-38]. In 2009, our group reported an unique copper-catalyzed oxidative coupling of difluoroenol silyl ethers with tertiary amines to access β-amino-α,α-difluoro ketones (Scheme 1c) [^[39]]. Recently, the reactions of difluoroenol silyl ethers and different radical precursors, such as aryl diazonium salts, Katritzky salts, and alkyl carboxylic redox esters have been achieved under photoredox catalysis (Scheme 1d) [40-43]. Despite these elegant advances, the development of new reactions of difluoroenol silyl ethers is still highly demanding.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Reactions with difluoroenol silyl ethers.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Alkylnitriles play an important role in organic and medicinal chemistry [44-46]. The preparation of alkylnitriles has attracted considerable attention [47-49]. Recent years have witnessed a renaissance of ring-opening of cyclobutanone oxime esters for the direct installation of diverse cyanoalkyl moieties into organic compounds under transition-metal [50-58] or photoredox [59-61] catalyzed conditions. Inspired by these achievements, herein we disclose an iron-catalyzed coupling of difluoroenol silyl ethers and cyclobutanone oxime esters to access novel gem-difluoromethylenated ketonitriles (Scheme 1e).

Initially, difluoroenol silyl ether 1a and cyclobutanone oxime ester 2a were chosen as the model substrates to optimize the reaction conditions (Table 1). To our delight, the common metal catalysts, such as Cu(OTf)₂, Ni(OAc)₂, and Fe(OTf)₂, could promote this coupling reaction (entries 1–3). Among them, Fe(OTf)₂ was optimal, affording the desired product 3aa in 74% yield. Then, other iron catalysts including Fe(acac)₂, Fe(OAc)₂, and Fe(OTf)₃ were tested (entries 4–6). The yield of 3aa was improved to 89% with Fe(OAc)₂ as the catalyst. However, further screening of the solvent (entries 7–10), reaction temperature (entries 11 and 12), and amount of catalyst (entries 13 and 14) failed to give better results.

Table 1

Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditions.^a

DownLoad: CSV

With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we first examined the scope of cyclobutanone oxime esters (Scheme 2). A variety of cyclobutanone oxime esters 2a-2s reacted efficiently with 1a to provide the corresponding gem-difluoromethylenated ketonitriles 3aa-3as in moderate to good yields. 3-Substituted oxime esters bearing alkyl (2b), benzyl (2c), aryl (2d-2l), nitrile (2m) and ester (2n) participated in this reaction smoothly. The synthetically useful aryl halides (2g-2k) were well tolerated. It should be noted that the 3,3-disubstituted cyclobutanone oxime ester (2o, 2p) did not exhibit obvious steric effect. On the other hand, sterically hindered substrate 2q deliver the desired product 3aq in lower yield. Oxetan-3-one and thietan-3-one derived oxime esters 2r and 2s were also suitable substrates. Notably, this reaction could be easily scaled up to 1.0 mmol with a slight decrease in yield.

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Scope of cyclobutanone oxime esters. Reaction conditions: 1a (0.4 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), Fe(OAc)₂ (0.02 mmol), DCE (2.0 mL), N₂, 100 ℃, 12 h, isolated yields. ^a Reaction was performed in 1.0 mmol.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Next, the generality of difluoroenol silyl ethers was investigated. As shown in Scheme 3, aromatic difluoroenol silyl ethers (1b-1g) bearing both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups were smoothly converted to the cyanoalkylated products. Naphthyl difluoroenol silyl ether (1h) was found to be the suitable reactant. The cyanoalkylation of heteroaryl difluoroenol silyl ether (1i) was also successful, affording products 3ia and 3id in moderate yields, respectively. However, alkyl difluoroenol silyl ethers were not compatible with the reaction conditions. The structure of product 3dr was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis (for details, see Supporting information).

Scheme 3

Scheme 3. Scope of difluoroenol silyl ethers. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.4 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), Fe(OAc)₂ (0.02 mmol), DCE (2.0 mL), N₂, 100 ℃, 12 h, isolated yields.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Subsequently, the derivatization of product 3aa was performed to probe the synthetic utility of this protocol (Scheme 4). Reduction of 3aa with NaBH₄ in EtOH afforded the corresponding alcohol 4 in 85% yield. Furthermore, treatment of 3aa with K₂CO₃ and H₂O₂ in MeOH furnished the amide derivative 5 in 88% yield.

Scheme 4

Scheme 4. Transformation of 3aa.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

To gain insight into the reaction mechanism, a radical scavenger, 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT), was added to the reaction mixture. The target product 3aa was not observed; instead, a cyanoalkyl−BHT adduct 6 was formed in 38% yield (Scheme 5a). This result indicated that a cyanoalkyl radical species was probably involved in this reaction. On the basis of this result and previous studies [40-43,50-58], a plausible mechanism was proposed for this iron-catalyzed reaction (Scheme 5b). First, single-electron transfer (SET) from Fe(Ⅱ) catalyst to cyclobutanone oxime esters 2 gives iminyl radical A and an Fe(Ⅲ) species. Then, iminyl radical A undergoes C−C bond cleavage via β-elimination, leading to γ-cyanoalkyl radical B, which is subsequently added to difluoroenol silyl ethers 1 to give β,β-difluoroalkyl radical C. This radical intermediate C would be oxidized by Fe(Ⅲ) species to the corresponding cation intermediate D. Finally, desilylation of intermediate D furnishes the desired products 3.

Scheme 5

Scheme 5. Proposed reaction mechanism.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

In summary, we have developed an iron-catalyzed coupling of readily available difluoroenol silyl ethers and cyclobutanone oxime esters to access novel gem-difluoromethylenated ketonitriles. This reaction proceeds under mild conditions with excellent functional group tolerance. Due to increasing importance of fluorine-containing compounds and synthetic utility of carbonyl and nitrile groups, this protocol might find applications in drug discovery and material science.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Acknowledgments

National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21421002, 21991211), and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDB20000000) are greatly acknowledged for funding this work.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.030.
1. [1]
  M.J. Tozer, T.F. Herpin, Tetrahedron 52(1996) 8619-8683. doi: 10.1016/0040-4020(96)00311-0
2. [2]
  D. O'Hagan, Chem. Soc. Rev. 37(2008) 308-319. doi: 10.1039/B711844A
3. [3]
  N.A. Meanwell, J. Med. Chem. 61(2018) 5822-5880. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01788
4. [4]
  D.M. Quinn, G.H. Lin, US Patent (1992) 5093371.
5. [5]
  C. Han, A.E. Salyer, E.H. Kim, et al., J. Med. Chem. 56(2013) 2456-2465. doi: 10.1021/jm301805e
6. [6]
  H.Y. Zhao, Z. Feng, Z. Luo, X. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55(2016) 10401-10405. doi: 10.1002/anie.201605380
7. [7]
  S.I. Scherbinina, O.V. Fedorov, V.V. Levin, et al., J. Org. Chem. 82(2017) 12967-12974. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b02467
8. [8]
  J.P. Phelan, S.B. Lang, J.S. Compton, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140(2018) 8037-8047. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b05243
9. [9]
  R. Pluta, N. Kumagai, M. Shibasaki, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58(2019) 2459-2463. doi: 10.1002/anie.201814607
10. [10]
  H. Cho, X. Du, J.P. Rizzi, et al., Nature 539(2016) 107-111. doi: 10.1038/nature19795
11. [11]
  Y.L. Li, J. Li, J. Deng, Adv. Synth. Catal. 359(2017) 1407-1412. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201601315
12. [12]
  C.E. Iacono, T.C. Stephens, T.S. Rajan, G. Pattison, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140(2018) 2036-2040. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12941
13. [13]
  W. Li, J. Zou, S. Zhu, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 25(2019) 10328-10332. doi: 10.1002/chem.201902834
14. [14]
  Y. Zhang, J. Ge, L. Luo, et al., Org. Lett. 22(2020) 7952-7957. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c02873
15. [15]
  M.H. Yang, J.R. Hunt, N. Sharifi, R.A. Altman, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55(2016) 9080-9083. doi: 10.1002/anie.201604149
16. [16]
  R.A. Hazlitt, Q.L. Tran, M.F. Sowaileh, D.A. Colby, J. Org. Chem. 82(2017) 2231-2236. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b02863
17. [17]
  L.S. Zheng, P. Phansavat, V. Ratovelomanana-Vidal, Org. Lett. 20(2018) 5107-5111. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01943
18. [18]
  P.R. Mears, S. Hoekman, C.E. Rye, et al., Org. Biomol. Chem. 17(2017) 1487-1505. doi: 10.1039/C6OB02618D
19. [19]
  L. Santos, A. Panossian, M. Donnard, et al., Org. Lett. 22(2020) 8741-8745. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03380
20. [20]
  T. Zhang, J. Pan, J. Duan, et al., ChemCatChem 11(2019) 5778-5782. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201901395
21. [21]
  X.L. Lv, C. Wang, Q.L. Wang, W. Shu, Org. Lett. 21(2019) 56-59. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b03485
22. [22]
  C.H. Qu, G.T. Song, J. Xu, et al., Org. Lett. 21(2019) 8169-8173. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b02487
23. [23]
  A. Reina, T. Krachko, K. Onida, et al., ACS Catal. 10(2020) 2189-2197. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b05159
24. [24]
  F. de Azambuja, M.H. Yang, T. Feoktistova, et al., Nat. Chem. 12(2020) 489-496. doi: 10.1038/s41557-020-0428-1
25. [25]
  M. Decostanzi, J.M. Campagne, E. Leclerc, Org. Biomol. Chem. 13(2015) 7351-7380. doi: 10.1039/C5OB00855G
26. [26]
  X.S. Hu, J.S. Yu, J. Zhou, Chem. Commun. 55(2019) 13638-13648. doi: 10.1039/C9CC07677H
27. [27]
  H. Amii, T. Kobayashi, Y. Hatamoto, K. Uneyama, Chem. Commun. (1999) 1323-1324.
28. [28]
  G.K.S. Prakash, J. Hu, G.A. Olah, J. Fluorine Chem. 112(2001) 357-362. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1139(01)00535-8
29. [29]
  J.S. Yu, F.M. Liao, W.M. Gao, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(2015) 7381-7385. doi: 10.1002/anie.201501747
30. [30]
  A. Honraedt, A.V.D. Lee, J.M. Campagne, E. Leclerc, Adv. Synth. Catal. 359(2017) 2815-2823. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201700371
31. [31]
  J.S. Li, Y.J. Liu, G.W. Zhang, J.A. Ma, Org. Lett. 19(2017) 6364-6367. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b03213
32. [32]
  X.S. Hu, P.G. Ding, J.S. Yu, J. Zhou, Org. Chem. Front. 6(2019) 2500-2505. doi: 10.1039/C9QO00577C
33. [33]
  X.S. Hu, J.X. He, S.Z. Dong, et al., Nat. Commun. 11(2020) 5500. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19387-4
34. [34]
  X. Huang, Y. Zhang, C. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58(2019) 5956-5961. doi: 10.1002/anie.201900745
35. [35]
  X. Gao, R. Cheng, Y.L. Xiao, X.L. Wan, X. Zhang, Chem. Commun. 5(2019) 2987-2999.
36. [36]
  J. Li, Y. Chen, R. Zhong, et al., Org. Lett. 22(2020) 1164-1168. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00018
37. [37]
  Y.J. Hao, Y. Gong, Y. Zhou, J. Zhou, J.S. Yu, Org. Lett. 22(2020) 8516-8521. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03123
38. [38]
  J. Li, W. Xi, R. Zhong, et al., Chem. Commun. 57(2021) 1050-1053. doi: 10.1039/D0CC06980A
39. [39]
  L. Chu, X. Zhang, F.L. Qing, Org. Lett. 11(2009) 2197-2200. doi: 10.1021/ol900541n
40. [40]
  Y.B. Wu, G.P. Lu, B.J. Zhou, et al., Chem. Commun. 52(2016) 5965-5968. doi: 10.1039/C6CC00177G
41. [41]
  F.S. He, Y. Yao, W. Xie, J. Wu, Chem. Commun. 56(2020) 9469-9472. doi: 10.1039/D0CC03591B
42. [42]
  Y. Huang, J. Jia, Q.P. Huang, et al., Chem. Commun. 56(2020) 14247-14250. doi: 10.1039/D0CC05725H
43. [43]
  H. Song, R. Cheng, Q.Q. Min, X. Zhang, Org. Lett. 22(2020) 7747-7750. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c02997
44. [44]
  F.F. Fleming, Q. Wang, Chem. Rev. 103(2003) 2035-2077. doi: 10.1021/cr020045d
45. [45]
  F.F. Fleming, L. Yao, P.C. Ravikumar, L. Funk, B.C. Shook, J. Med. Chem. 53(2010) 7902-7917. doi: 10.1021/jm100762r
46. [46]
  M.X. Wang, Acc. Chem. Res. 48(2015) 602-611. doi: 10.1021/ar500406s
47. [47]
  J. Kim, H.J. Kim, S. Chang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51(2012) 11948-11959. doi: 10.1002/anie.201206168
48. [48]
  R. López, C. Palomo, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(2015) 13170-13184. doi: 10.1002/anie.201502493
49. [49]
  F. Xiao, Y. Guo, Y.F. Zeng, Adv. Synth. Catal. 363(2021) 120-143. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202001093
50. [50]
  Z. Chen, Q. Zhou, Q.L. Wang, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 362(2020) 3004-3010. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202000369
51. [51]
  J. Zhang, M. Yang, J.B. Liu, F.S. He, J. Wu, Chem. Commun. 56(2020) 3225-3228. doi: 10.1039/D0CC00375A
52. [52]
  B. Zhao, Y. Wu, Y. Yuan, Z. Shi, Chem. Commun. 56(2020) 4676-4679. doi: 10.1039/D0CC00988A
53. [53]
  X.Y. Lu, C.C. Liu, R.C. Jiang, et al., Chem. Commun. 56(2020) 14191-14194. doi: 10.1039/D0CC06517J
54. [54]
  C.K. Ran, H. Huang, X.H. Li, et al., Chin. J. Chem. 38(2020) 69-76. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201900384
55. [55]
  Y. Deng, C. Zhao, Y. Zhou, et al., Org. Lett. 22(2020) 3524-3530. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00963
56. [56]
  D. Yang, H. Huang, M.H. Li, et al., Org. Lett. 22(2020) 4333-4338. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01365
57. [57]
  J. Lou, J. Ma, B.H. Xu, Y.G. Zhou, Z. Yu, Org. Lett. 22(2020) 5202-5206. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01645
58. [58]
  M. Li, C.T. Wang, Q.F. Bao, et al., Org. Lett. 23(2021) 751-756. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03973
59. [59]
  Y. Liu, Q.L. Wang, Z. Chen, et al., Chem. Commun. 56(2020) 3011-3014. doi: 10.1039/C9CC10057A
60. [60]
  M.M. Zhang, S.H. Li, J.L. Tu, Q.Q. Min, F. Liu, Org. Chem. Front. 7(2020) 622-627. doi: 10.1039/C9QO01446B
61. [61]
  X.Y. Yu, J. Chen, H.W. Chen, W.J. Xiao, J.R. Chen, Org. Lett. 22(2020) 2333-2338. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c00532
Figure 1 Representative bioactive α, α-difluoroketones.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Scheme 1 Reactions with difluoroenol silyl ethers.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Scheme 2 Scope of cyclobutanone oxime esters. Reaction conditions: 1a (0.4 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), Fe(OAc)₂ (0.02 mmol), DCE (2.0 mL), N₂, 100 ℃, 12 h, isolated yields. ^a Reaction was performed in 1.0 mmol.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Scheme 3 Scope of difluoroenol silyl ethers. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.4 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), Fe(OAc)₂ (0.02 mmol), DCE (2.0 mL), N₂, 100 ℃, 12 h, isolated yields.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Scheme 4 Transformation of 3aa.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Scheme 5 Proposed reaction mechanism.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Table 1. Optimization of reaction conditions.^a

下载: 导出CSV