Amorphous carbon-linked TiO2/carbon nanotube film composite with enhanced photocatalytic performance: The effect of interface contact and hydrophilicity

Zekun Xin Xiaodong Zhao Huiming Ji Tianyi Ma Hui Li Shuhui Zhong Zhurui Shen

Citation:  Zekun Xin, Xiaodong Zhao, Huiming Ji, Tianyi Ma, Hui Li, Shuhui Zhong, Zhurui Shen. Amorphous carbon-linked TiO2/carbon nanotube film composite with enhanced photocatalytic performance: The effect of interface contact and hydrophilicity[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2021, 32(7): 2151-2154. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.054 shu

Amorphous carbon-linked TiO2/carbon nanotube film composite with enhanced photocatalytic performance: The effect of interface contact and hydrophilicity

English

  • Water pollution caused by industrialization has been recognized as a severe challenge in the 21st century [1]. Organic dye pollution has caused great concern due to its widespread application in industry. The discharge of high-color sewage can reduce the penetration of light, thereby reducing the ability of algae to produce food and oxygen [2]. At present, using photocatalysts was proposed as an environmentally friendly potential strategy [3, 4]. TiO2, which is widely used in various fields, is non-toxicity, acid and alkali corrosion resistance and low cost [5]. However, the TiO2 powder is easy to agglomerate and requires a long precipitation time and efficient solid-liquid separation technology [6]. In addition, the band gap of single-phase TiO2 is around 3.2 eV, not sensitive to visible light which limits its development [7]. Consequently, designing new TiO2-based photocatalysts to inhibit agglomeration, facilitate separation and improve photocatalytic activity is very attractive and challenging for sewage purification.

    At present, loading TiO2 on glass, silica and film materials is one of the most effective methods to inhibit agglomeration and facilitate separation [8], such as glass fiber, zeolite [9, 10].Compared with other substrates, thin film materials possess low density and can float on water, making it close to the air and water interface, enhancing the oxidation of the photocatalyst, which is a prerequisite for an efficient photocatalytic process [11]. Among these widely explored film substrates, CNTF displays excellent response to entire range from ultraviolet to infrared light [12, 13], and its network channel can form an electrons transmission channel, appearing excellent electronic properties [14-16], which can be used to couple with TiO2 to enhance light absorption, promote the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes and further improve photocatalytic activity.

    In this work, the TCC composite was synthesized by a simple atomization spray method, using CNTF as the substrate and resin as the linking agent for TiO2 spraying. TCC composite was annealed to carbonize the resin in the middle to amorphous carbon, coupling the titanium dioxide and improving the conductivity of electrons in the catalyst [17, 18]. The TCC composite sprayed with nine layers of TiO2 can degrade 91.29% of RhB within 120 min. The total organic carbon (TOC) content in the RhB solution before and after the reaction was detected. TCC composite can completely mineralize most of the RhB with a mineralization rate of 61.7%.

    The crystal structure of TiO2, CNTF and 9TCC were studied by XRD. As shown in Fig. S2a (Supporting information), the characteristic peaks of TiO2 at 2θ=25.5°, 38.1°, 48.2°, 54.3° and 55.0° is corresponding to (101), (004), (200), (211) and (204) crystal planes of anatase TiO2 respectively, which are consistent with JCPDS No. 21-1272 [19, 20]. The diffraction peak of CNTF at 2θ=26.3° is indexed to the (002) crystal plane of graphite material [21]. After coupled with TiO2, the characteristic peak of TiO2 in 9TCC can be observed. Since the peak of the carbon in 9TCC is not obvious, we carry out further tests on the CNTF and 9TCC through Raman analysis. In Fig. S2b (Supporting information), the peak of TiO2 at 144.96 cm−1 (Eg), 639.37 cm−1 (Eg), 517.56 cm−1 (A1g, B1g) and 396.29 cm−1 (B1g) can be clearly seen by the Raman spectrum of 9TCC, among which the characteristic peak of anatase TiO2 can be obviously observed at 144.96 cm−1 [22, 23]. In addition, the Raman spectroscopy is widely used to characterize the interaction of carbon materials with other substances. Peak D at 1358 cm−1 is the characteristic peak of defects around carbon atoms, and peak G at 1586 cm−1 is the stretching vibration of sp2 hybridization of C atoms. The smaller the ID/IG, the higher degree of graphitization of carbon [24]. It can be observed from the Fig. S2b that the ID/IG of TCC is greater than that of CNTF, mainly due to the amorphous carbon formed after the resin carbonization.

    The composition and valence of each element of 9TCC was monitored by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) high-resolution spectrum analysis. It can be seen from the Fig. S2d (Supporting information) that there are four states of C. The binding energy from low to high is sp2 and sp3 hybridized C-C bond at 284.8 eV, C-O bond at 285. 8 eV, C-O-C bond at 286.7 eV, and C=O bond at 288.3 eV. The formation of these bonds are mainly due to resin cross linking [25]. In Fig. S2e (Supporting information), the peaks of 529.5 eV and 532.2 eV correspond to O in TiO2 and O in Ti2O3, respectively. The peak of 531.1 eV can be attributed to the O-H bond of TiO2 [26]. In addition, the spectrum of Ti 2p exhibits Ti 2p1/2 and Ti 2p3/2 energy levels. The difference of the two energy levels is 5.8 eV, which is consistent with the literature [27]. The C-O bonds are also observed in the FT-IR spectrum (Fig. S3 in Supporting information).

    The microstructure of 9TCC was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis. Fig. 1a can observe the network structure of CNTF, and Figs. 1b-d are the SEM images of 3, 9 and 11 layers of TiO2 sprayed. It can be concluded that the TiO2 dispersion effect is better, and each particle is about 10−50 nm. While TiO2 is uniformly loaded on the CNTF framework, it also has certain pores and sufficient reactive sites. With the growth of TiO2, the TiO2 particles that did not adhere to the resin began to agglomerate due to the high surface tension, as shown in Fig. 1d. We can observe from Fig. S4 (Supporting information) that TiO2 is supported on CNTF. The lattice fringes of TiO2 are clearly observed in Fig. 1e. The lattice spacing of 0.35 nm is attributed to the (101) crystal plane of TiO2, and the lattice spacing of 0.19 nm corresponds to the (200) crystal plane [28]. It is important to see that TiO2 is in good contact with the carbonized resin, forming a good interface. In Fig. 1f, the mapping spectrum of TCC also shows that the framework of CNTF contains three elements: C, O, and Ti, which proves that TiO2 is successfully loaded on CNTF.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  SEM images of pure CNTF (a), 3TCC (b), 9TCC (c) and 11TCC (d). (e) HRTEM images of 9TCC. (f) Elemental mapping images of 9TCC.

    The photocatalytic activity was evaluated by the degradation of RhB under ultraviolet light irradiation. In Fig. 2a, the degradation efficiency of RhB by spraying CNTF with different layers of TiO2 in 120 min was detected. Among them, 9TCC displayed remarkable photocatalytic activity, with a degradation rate of 91.29% in 120 min. We can see from Fig. 2b that the Rh B degradation effciencies over the pure TiO2 was 63%. The degradation rate of 9TCC is 1.45 times that of pure TiO2 powder. The phenomenon of CNTF has also been observed for comparison. Besides, the photocatalytic degradation reactions follow the first-order model (Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetic) [29]: −ln(C0/C) = kt, where C0 is the initial concentration, C is the concentration of RhB at the time t and k is the apparent rate constant. In Fig. 2c, the apparent reaction rates of 9TCC (0.0233 min−1) was 2.7 times as high as that of pure TiO2 (0.00859 min−1). The UV absorption spectrum of RhB in Fig. 2d is consistent with the degradation curve of RhB by 9TCC. What is more, we conducted recycle experiments to evaluate the stability of the 9TCC. In Fig. 2e, the RhB could still reach 88% within 120 min after three cycles, indicating that it had good cycle stability. Organic carbon degradation efficiency is an important factor in the practical application of photocatalysts. In Fig. 2f, the TOC before and after 9TCC degradation of RhB are 8.07 mg/L and 3.09 mg/L, respectively, and the mineralization rate is 61.71%, which proves that the composite membrane can completely mineralize most of RhB into H2O and CO2.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Degradation of RhB by (a) TCC with different layers of TiO2 and (b) CNTF, TiO2, 9TCC. (c) First-order plots for the photo-degradation of RhB and (d) liquid phase UV spectrum of 9TCC. (e) Cycling test of 9TCC; (f) TOC of 9TCC before and after the photo-degradation test.

    In general, the photocatalytic process mainly includes: (ⅰ) Light absorption, (ⅱ) the generation and migration of electron-hole pairs and (ⅲ) the redox reaction of active sites on the surface [30]. We will explore the reasons for the improvement of photocatalytic activity from these aspects. First, the light absorption properties of TiO2 and 9TCC were researched by UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. In Fig. 3a, it can be seen that the characteristic absorption edge of TiO2 is about 400 nm, while 9TCC has a strong absorption of light and responds to light in the entire ultraviolet-visible region. The band gap can be calculated by the following formula [31]: αhv = A(Eg)m/4, where α is the absorption coefficient, h is Planck's constant, A is constant, m depends on the semiconductor type. As shown in Fig. 3b, the calculated band gap width (Eg) of TiO2 and 9TCC are 3.28 eV and 3.03 eV. The smaller band gap of 9TCC is beneficial to better utilization of light, in favor of improving the photocatalytic activity. In addition, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and transient photocurrent response were also evaluated. Photocurrent refers to the situation in which electrons respond when the material is irradiated with light, and the electrons and holes are separated, migrate and form a current. Fig. 3c illustrates that TiO2 and 9TCC can form a stable current under the irradiation of a 300 W xenon lamp. A higher current density of 9TCC was observed, indicating that it has better separation of electron-hole pairs, which is consistent with the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of RhB. In Fig. 3d, the Nyquist plots of 9TCC and TiO2 are displayed. The equivalent circuit is shown in Fig. 3d in the upper left corner. Rs is the interface resistance between the photocatalyst and the carrier, Re is the carrier migration resistance at the interface between the electrolyte and the counter electrode, and Rct is the carrier migration resistance between the electrolyte and the photocatalyst. Rct is an important parameter to characterize the photocatalytic activity [32, 33]. From the relevant parameters of the equivalent circuit diagram (Table S1 in Supporting information), it can be observed that theRct of 9TCC is the smallest, indicating the lowest charge transfer resistance and the best separation of electron-hole pairs.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  (a) UV–vis-NIR diffuse-reflectance spectra and (b) converted Kubelka-Munk plot of TiO2 and 9TCC. (c) Transient photocurrent response diagram and (d) Nyquist plots of TiO2 and 9TCC. (e) PL emission spectra of TiO2 and 9TCC. (f) Contact angle of 9TCC. (g) Photodegradable RhB with scavenger agent. (h) Schematic diagram of photocatalytic process of 9TCC.

    Finally, we conducted a photoluminescence (PL) spectrum and hydrophilicity test. The recombination of electrons and holes can be detected by PL spectrum after the electron transition from valence band to conduction band. In Fig. 3e, the PL spectrum shows that all materials have an emission peak at 370 nm. The stronger emission peaks of TiO2 at 370 nm. Compared with TiO2, the peak of 9TCC is lower, which proves that it has a lower electron-hole recombination rate. According to reports, the hydrophilicity of the photocatalyst has a synergistic effect with the photocatalytic activity [34], so we measured the contact angle of TCC. In Fig. 3f, the contact angle of CNTF is 106.62°, and the contact angles of 3TCC, 5TCC and 9TCC are 87.78°, 64.6° and 9.68°, respectively. The improved wettability of the TCC composite is attributed to the hydroxyl group on the surface of TiO2 [35]. The hydroxyl group can improve the wettability of the composite in aqueous solution, enhance the contact between the catalyst and the dye, and potentially increase the catalytic ability of the composite [36].

    In order to verify the band gap positions of semiconductor, Mott-Schottky tests for TiO2 and 9TCC were performed. Fig. S6a and b (Supporting information) presents that the slope of TiO2 and 9TCC are positive, which are typical n-type semiconductor. The intercept between the Mott-schottky curve and the X-axis is the flat band potential (VFB) of the semiconductor. The minimum value of the conduction band (CB) of the n-type semiconductor differs by 0.2 V from the respective VFB [37]. Therefore, the CB of TiO2 is −0.62 eV, and the VB is 2.66 eV calculated by ECB = EVBEg [38]. The CB and VB of the 9TCC are −0.48 eV and 2.55 eV, respectively. In order to explore the main oxygen active substances in photocatalytic degradation, capture experiments were carried out with ammonium oxalate, p-benzoquinone and tert-butanol as scavengers for h+, ·O2 and ·OH. In Fig. 3g, the degradation rate of RhB with scavenger added is exhibited. The inhibitory effect of adding hydroxyl radical traps is the most obvious, which proves that ·OH is the main oxidizing species in the photodegradation process. Based on the above results, the photocatalytic mechanism of TCC is shown in Fig. 3h. The electrons of TiO2 in VB can be excited to CB to form photo-excited electrons, producing photo-excited holes in VB. Amorphous carbon is used as an electron transport channel to migrate the photo-excited electrons of TiO2 to the CNTF, which accelerating the separation efficiency of the photogenerated carries and enhancing the photocatalytic reaction. For RhB degradation, the VB potential of n-TiO2 (EVB = 2.66 eV vs. NHE) can oxidize H2O into ·OH (E(·OH/H2O) =2.38 eV vs. NHE) [39]. Finally, RhB can be mineralized to CO2 and H2O by ·OH.

    RhB intermediates in photodegradation were analyzed by HPLC-MS (Table S2 in Supporting information). The degradation of RhB is shown in Fig. S7 (Supporting information) and begins with N-de-ethylation reaction. The N, N-diethylrhodamine (DR) and N-ethylrhodamine (EER) with m/z peaks of 415 and 387, and rhodamine, a completely de-ethylated product are detected. The discoloration of the RhB solution may be caused by the de-ethylation process [40]. This experiment can also detect phthalic anhydride and benzoic acid at the m/z peaks of 148 and 122, which proves that the oxygen-active species can further attack the carbon chain and cause a ring-opening reaction. Chain organic, such as oxalic acid, maleic acid and p-hydroxybenzoic acid [41]. Finally, the photocatalyst completely mineralizes small molecular organics into H2O and CO2, which is consistent with the result of TOC.

    In this work, we prepared a novel TCC composite film for the degradation of RhB dyes. Compared with TiO2, TCC composite film exhibited much enhanced photocatalytic activity. The CNTF can enhance light absorption to improve the separation and mobility of electrons and holes. The existence of amorphous carbon will promote these advances. Besides, the better hydrophilic properties would enhance the catalytic performance happened on the solid-liquid interface. In addition, we analyzed the degradation pathway of RhB by TCC based on the experimental results of TOC and HPLC-MS. The TCC composite film can oxidize the carbon on the benzene ring of RhB to decompose it into small organic molecules, and finally mineralize into H 2O and CO2.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21872102 and 21906001).

    Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.054.


    1. [1]

      Z. Bian, F. Cao, J. Zhu, H. Li, Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (2015) 2418-2424. doi: 10.1021/es505540x

    2. [2]

      F. Mashkoor, A. Nasar, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 500 (2020) 166408. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166408

    3. [3]

      M. Ji, Z. Zhang, J. Xia, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 29 (2018) 805-810. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.05.002

    4. [4]

      S. He, C. Yan, X.Z. Chen, et al., Appl. Catal. B 276 (2020)119138. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119138

    5. [5]

      S. Hu, Y. Yu, Y. Guan, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 2839-2842. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.08.021

    6. [6]

      F.C. Ferreira, R.S. Babu, A.L.F. de Barros, et al., Spectroc. Acta Part A 233 (2020) 118198. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2020.118198

    7. [7]

      K. Ilić, A. Selmani, M. Milić, et al., J. Nanopart. Res. 22 (2020) 71. doi: 10.1007/s11051-020-04791-0

    8. [8]

      J. Krýsa, G. Waldner, H. Měšt'ánková, J. Jirkovský, G. Grabner, Appl. Catal. B 64 (2006) 290-301. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.11.007

    9. [9]

      S. Fukugaichi, T. Henmi, N. Matsue, Catal. Lett. 143 (2013) 1255-1259. doi: 10.1007/s10562-013-1119-y

    10. [10]

      H. Yu, S.C. Lee, J. Yu, C.H. Ao, J. Mol, Catal. A Chem. 246 (2006) 206-211. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2005.11.007

    11. [11]

      P. Karami, B. Khorshidi, M. McGregor, et al., J. Clean. Prod. 250 (2020) 119447. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119447

    12. [12]

      Y. Liu, J. Yin, P. Wang, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 (2018) 36304-36311. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b14386

    13. [13]

      M. Zhu, M. Fujitsuka, L. Zeng, M. Liu, T. Majima, Appl. Catal. B 256 (2019) 117864. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117864

    14. [14]

      M. Wongaree, S. Chiarakorn, S. Chuangchote, T. Sagawa, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23 (2016) 21395-21406. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7348-z

    15. [15]

      T.V. Cuong, H.N. Tien, V.H. Luan, et al., Phys. Status Solidi A: Appl. Mat. 208 (2011) 943-946. doi: 10.1002/pssa.201026553

    16. [16]

      M.S. Balogun, H. Yang, Y. Luo, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 11 (2018) 1859-1869. doi: 10.1039/C8EE00522B

    17. [17]

      Q. Liu, L. Ai, J. Jiang, J. Mater. Chem. A 6 (2018) 4102-4110. doi: 10.1039/C7TA09350K

    18. [18]

      A. Jian, M. Wang, L. Wang, et al., RSC Adv. 9 (2019) 41540-41548. doi: 10.1039/C9RA07767G

    19. [19]

      H. Liu, W. Li, D. Shen, D. Zhao, G. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 13161-13166. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08743

    20. [20]

      H. Yin, X. Wang, L. Wang, et al., Mater. Res. Bull. 72 (2015) 176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.07.030

    21. [21]

      T. Onoe, S. Iwamoto, M. Inoue, Catal. Commun. 8 (2007) 701-706. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2006.08.018

    22. [22]

      H.U. Farouk, A.A.A. Raman, W.M.A.W. Daud, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 33 (2016) 11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.10.022

    23. [23]

      M.M. Hossain, H. Shima, M.A. Islam, M. Hasan, M. Lee, J. Phys. Chem. C 120 (2016) 17670-17682. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03484

    24. [24]

      J.Y. Kim, Materials 2 (2009) 1955-1974. doi: 10.3390/ma2041955

    25. [25]

      N. Ohtsu, N. Masahashi, Y. Mizukoshi, K. Wagatsuma, Langmuir 25 (2009) 11586-11591. doi: 10.1021/la901505m

    26. [26]

      M.E. Simonsen, Z. Li, E.G. Søgaard, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 (2009) 8054-8062. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.05.013

    27. [27]

      B. Gong, X. Luo, N. Bao, et al., Surf. Interface Anal. 46 (2014) 1043-1046. doi: 10.1002/sia.5397

    28. [28]

      F. Boccuzzi, A. Chiorino, M. Manzoli, et al., J. Catal. 202 (2001) 256-267. doi: 10.1006/jcat.2001.3290

    29. [29]

      Z. Wei, Y. Liu, J. Wang, et al., Nanoscale 7 (2015) 13943-13950. doi: 10.1039/C5NR02345A

    30. [30]

      B. Li, Z. Cao, S. Wang, Q. Wei, Z. Shen, Dalton Trans. 47 (2018) 10288-10298. doi: 10.1039/C8DT02402B

    31. [31]

      H. Wang, X. Yuan, Y. Wu, et al., Appl. Catal. B 186 (2016) 19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.12.041

    32. [32]

      Y. Zhang, Z. Shen, Z. Xin, Z. Hu, H. Ji, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 554 (2019) 743-751. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.07.077

    33. [33]

      J. Duan, Q. Tang, B. He, L. Yu, Electrochim. Acta 139 (2014) 381-385. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.165

    34. [34]

      Y.S. Li, T.T. Li, X.F. Song, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 514 (2020) 145789. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145789

    35. [35]

      R. Mimouni, B. Askri, T. Larbi, M. Amlouk, A. Meftah, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 115 (2020)107889. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2020.107889

    36. [36]

      Z. Li, H. Dong, Z. Wu, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 529 (2020) 147162. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147162

    37. [37]

      D. Jiang, L. Chen, J. Zhu, et al., Dalton Trans. 42 (2013) 15726-15734. doi: 10.1039/c3dt52008k

    38. [38]

      X. Wu, M. Li, J. Li, G. Zhang, S. Yin, Appl. Catal. B 219 (2017) 132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.025

    39. [39]

      Y. Chen, J.F. Li, P.Y. Liao, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 1516-1519. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.12.013

    40. [40]

      N. Guo, H. Liu, Y. Fu, J. Hu, Optik 201 (2020) 163537. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163537

    41. [41]

      G. Sharma, D.D. Dionysiou, S. Sharma, et al., Catal. Today 335 (2019) 437-451. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.03.063

  • Figure 1  SEM images of pure CNTF (a), 3TCC (b), 9TCC (c) and 11TCC (d). (e) HRTEM images of 9TCC. (f) Elemental mapping images of 9TCC.

    Figure 2  Degradation of RhB by (a) TCC with different layers of TiO2 and (b) CNTF, TiO2, 9TCC. (c) First-order plots for the photo-degradation of RhB and (d) liquid phase UV spectrum of 9TCC. (e) Cycling test of 9TCC; (f) TOC of 9TCC before and after the photo-degradation test.

    Figure 3  (a) UV–vis-NIR diffuse-reflectance spectra and (b) converted Kubelka-Munk plot of TiO2 and 9TCC. (c) Transient photocurrent response diagram and (d) Nyquist plots of TiO2 and 9TCC. (e) PL emission spectra of TiO2 and 9TCC. (f) Contact angle of 9TCC. (g) Photodegradable RhB with scavenger agent. (h) Schematic diagram of photocatalytic process of 9TCC.

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  6
  • 文章访问数:  298
  • HTML全文浏览量:  55
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2021-07-15
  • 收稿日期:  2020-09-21
  • 接受日期:  2020-11-13
  • 修回日期:  2020-10-23
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-12-01
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章