CeO2 quantum dots doped Ni-Co hydroxide nanosheets for ultrahigh energy density asymmetric supercapacitors

Huiyu Duan Tong Wang Xinyi Wu Ziyun Su Jing Zhuang Suli Liu Rongmei Zhu Changyun Chen Huan Pang

Citation:  Duan Huiyu, Wang Tong, Wu Xinyi, Su Ziyun, Zhuang Jing, Liu Suli, Zhu Rongmei, Chen Changyun, Pang Huan. CeO2 quantum dots doped Ni-Co hydroxide nanosheets for ultrahigh energy density asymmetric supercapacitors[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2020, 31(9): 2330-2332. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.06.001 shu

CeO2 quantum dots doped Ni-Co hydroxide nanosheets for ultrahigh energy density asymmetric supercapacitors


  • It is widely known that transition metal hydroxides (TMHs) are attractive materials for the design of electrodes with application in electrocatalysis [1-6], electrochemical analysis [7-9] and electrochemical energy storage [10-18], arising from their metal hydroxyl host layers and anions that can balance the charges in their crystalline galleries. Both Ni and Co are important members of the transition elements, which means they are not expensive and suitable for applying as high-performance electrodes. Thus, Ni and Co based materials have become a popular cathode material for electrochemistry [19], particularly for electric energy storage [20-23]. That is probably because of Faradaic oxidation-reduction reactions with hydroxyl anions and large theoretical surface area. In a case, Wang's group synthesized 2-methylimidazole-derived Ni-Co LDH nanosheets and used for high-performance electrode material in hybrid supercapacitors [24]. Li and his group used CoSx/Ni-Co LDH nanocages with rhombic dodecahedral structure for high-performance electrode of asymmetric supercapacitors [25]. Nonetheless, the poor intrinsic conductivity and low ion conductive rate of transition metal hydroxides restricted their actual application.

    In recent years, quantum dots have attracted intensive researches in many fields, which are microscopic semiconductor particles of a few nanometers, having optical and electronic properties. They differ from normal particles owing to quantum mechanics [26], involving the interaction of electrons with a pseudopotential or random matrix [27]. Because of the unique electronic and physicochemical properties, such as their strong and tunable fluorescence emission properties, quantum dots have been widely applied in luminescence [28, 29], bioimaging [30], solar cells [31] and photo-electrocatalysis [32]. Besides, due to their small size, quantum dots usually display very high-level exposure of active sites [33], which would bring accelerated electroactivity. Arising from the extraordinary characteristics of lanthanide elements, such as allowing faster electrons and protons transfer, when doped in poor conductors, their intrinsic conductivity usually can be enhanced [34]. That makes lanthanide elements been such widely applied in electrochemistry [35]. As an important member of lanthanide elements, Ce is widely applied in electrochemical energy storage [36] particularly because of the excellent oxidation-reduction abilities.

    By integrating the merits of both lanthanide elements and quantum dots, herein CeO2 quantum dots doped Ni-Co hydroxide nanosheet (denoted as CQNCH) was designed for the first time via a controllable synthetic strategy. CeO2 particles in the form of quantum dots were homogeneously dispersed on ultrathin Ni-Co hydroxide nanosheets, which could remarkably boost the electrochemical performance. The CQNCH showed an outstanding specific capacitance (1370.7 F/g at 1 A/g) and a good cyclic stability. In addition, we assembled an aqueous asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) with CQNCH, presenting an extremely high energy density, which was up to 108.9 Wh/kg. Furthermore, this strategy can also be used to the controllable fabrication of other rare-earth elements oxides quantum dots doped transition metal hydroxides that could promote the development of electrochemical energy storage.

    CQNCH was fabricated via a convenient method and schematically showed in Fig. 1 (more synthetic details in Supporting information). We found that the doping of CeO2 particles in quantum dots size homogeneously dispersed on Ni-Co hydroxide nanosheets, which obviously changed the morphology and electrochemical properties.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  (a) XPS spectrum of CQNCH. (b) High-resolution of Ce 3d XPS spectra.

    X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterized the structure of CQNCH (Fig. S1a in Supporting information). The pattern confirmed the Cedoped Ni-Co hydroxide nanosheets that consisted of Ni(OH)2 (JCPDS No.14-0117), Co(OH)2 (JCPDS No. 51-1731) and CeO2 (JCPDS No. 34-0394), which exhibited three main diffraction peaks corresponding to (001) plane of Ni(OH)2, (001) and (002) planes of Co(OH)2. Similar with our previous work, the strong characteristic peak in region of low angle contributed from the interlayer intervals, which suggested CQNCH a layered structure [37]. As shown in Fig. S1b, there were also two weak diffraction peaks, which corresponded to (111), (200) planes of CeO2.

    The oxidation state and chemical composition of CQNCH were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The survey spectrum was shown in Fig. 2a, indicating that Ni, Co, Ce, O, C and a small amountN (from ammonium and nitrate)were evident. Fig. S2a (Supporting information) showed the high-resolution of Ni 2p spectrum. It suggested two clear-cut peaks at 855 and 873 eV, which were assigned to the Ni2p1/2 and Ni2p3/2 signalsofNi(Ⅱ) [38], aswell as the two satellite peaks located at 861 and 879 eV. As shown in Fig. S2b (Supporting information), the high-resolution of Co 2p spectrum displayed two peaks at 781 eV and 796 eV, which could be assigned to Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2 [39]. Therewere six peaks in Fig. 2b, referring to threepairsof spin-orbitdoublets, whichwere denoted as v, v'', v''' that were contributed from Ce(Ⅳ) 3d5/2 and u, u'', u''' that were from Ce(Ⅳ) 3d5/2. Other signatures (denoted as v0, v', u0, and u') were ascribed to Ce(Ⅲ) [27]. It is probably because the Ce(Ⅳ) was partly reduced to Ce(Ⅲ) by dodecylamine.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (a) XPS spectrum of CQNCH. (b) High-resolution of Ce 3d XPS spectra.

    The morphological features of CQNCH were revealed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Figs. 3a and b showed the SEM images of as-synthesized samples, which revealed the layered structure, in line with the result of XRD. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) further disclosed the morphological features of CQNCH. The TEM images at different resolutions were shown in Figs. 3c and d, which further confirmed the paper-like layered structure. What is more, according to Fig. 3e, it clearly demonstrated that the CeO2 was homogeneously dispersed on the surface of Ni-Co hydroxide nanosheets in the form of quantum dots. Comparing with Ni-Co hydroxide nanosheets (Fig. S3 in Supporting information), the doping of CeO2 could make Ni-Co hydroxide nanosheets dispersed and prevent aggregation, which enabled CQNCH more exposure of active sites. The high-resolution TEM was shown in Fig. 3f, which unraveled one obvious lattice fringe with an interplanar gap of 0.271 nm, completely corresponding to (200) plane of CeO2. The corresponding elements mapping images were shown in Fig. 3c, which displayed Ni, Co and Ce were almost uniformly distributed in the CQNCH.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  (a, b) SEM image of the as-prepared CQNCH. (c) TEM image and elements mapping images of CQNCH. (d) TEM image of CQNCH. (e, f) HRTEM image of CQNCH.

    Different electrochemical analytic methods can be utilized to examine the electrochemical property of CQNCH. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) is a crucial technique to investigate the redox behavior of an electrode material, and the result was shown in Fig. S6a (Supporting information). The result of CV at scan rates ranging from 10 mV/s to 50 mV/s in a 3 mol/L KOH exhibited complex redox peaks, indicating the redox behavior consisted of Co(OH)2 and Ni(OH)2, with the existence of hydroxide ions. The clear redox peaks and large area of CV curves indicated the excellent faradic electrochemical reaction process, which led to a good pseudocapacitive performance.

    The galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) curves of CQNCH within a voltage window of 0 to 0.4 V at 1.0–5.0 A/g were shown in Fig. S6b (Supporting information), in which the large current density peaks at all scan rates suggested the good pseudocapacitive behavior. The plateaus in the GCD curves indicated the presence of Faradaic processes, which were consistent with the CV scanning results. According to the GCD curves, the specific capacity of CQNCH was calculated to 1370.7, 1231.0, 1172.6, 1141.8 and 1120.5 F/g at current densities of 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0 A/g, respectively (Fig. S6c in Supporting information). For comparison, Fig. S5 showed the GCD curves of Ni-Co hydroxide nanosheets and the specific capacitance was also displayed in Fig. S6c, which demonstrated the doping of Ce obviously enhanced the supercapacitor performance of pristine Ni-Co hydroxide nanosheets.

    It is significant for energy storage appliances to work with safety and stability in a long time, so the cycling stability test is very meaningful. As shown in Fig. S6d (Supporting information), we tested the cycling stability of CQNCH via constant cycling (charge and discharge) at 2.0 A/g. In the first cycle, the capacitance of CQNCH was 1202.2 F/g. As the cycle number increased, the capacitance gradually enlarged and got the maximum of 1230.8 F/g at the 6th cycle. When cycled 1000 times, the capacitance declined to 1174.6 F/g. With the further increase of cycle number, the descending rate slowed down slightly. After 4000 cycles it finally faded to 1083.8 F/g, retaining more than 90.1% of its initial capacity at 2.0 A/g.

    Additionally, we assembled the aqueous asymmetric supercapacitor device whose positive and negative electrodes were consisted of CQNCH and activated carbon, respectively (denoted as CQNCH//AC). The CV and GCD curves of CQNCH//AC at divergent scan rates were shown in Figs. 4a and b. The CQNCH//AC reached an ultrahigh energy density of 108.9 Wh/kg at 378 W/kg and remained 62.2 Wh/kg even at 4381 W/kg, which is significantly better than previously reported ASCs, such as CCO-NS//HCP-CNF (25.4 Wh/kg at 400 W/kg) [40], EC@NiCo2S4//EC (46.4 Wh/kg at 801 W/kg) [41], CoNiSe2//AC (46.5 Wh/kg at 160.1 W/kg) [42], NCNs-0.1//AC (43.02 Wh/kg at 820.29 W/kg) [43], NA-LDH-OA-2//AC (40.26 Wh/kg at 943 W/kg) [8], PPC-800-2//PPC-800-2 (16.97 Wh/kg at 200 W/kg) [44]. Fig. 4c showed the corresponding comparison Ragone plots. What is more, the CQNCH//AC also exhibited satisfying cycling stability that retained more than 88.1% after 4000 cycles at 2 A/g (Fig. 4d). After stability test, the positive electrode materials were characterized by XRD again (Fig. S7 in Supporting information). According to Fig. S7, the peaks had no significant change, which suggested that the materials kept the initial structure after the stability test. The CV and GCD curves of AC were shown in Fig. S8 (Supporting information), which showed the capacity of 115.5 F/g at 1 A/g.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  (a) Cyclic voltammetry within a 0.15–0.55 V range at a scan rate 10–50 mV/s on the electrode in 3.0 mol/L KOH at room temperature. (b) Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves with current densities of 0.5–5.0 A/g. (c) Ragone plots of CQNCH// AC compared with those of the previous asymmetric supercapacitors; (d) Charge-discharge cycling test at 2.0 A/g.

    In conclusion, we fabricated a paper-like layered CeO2 quantum dots doped Ni-Co hydroxide nanosheets via a simple one-step solvothermal method, which is low-cost, environment benign and convenient. The consequences exhibited that CQNCH presented an enhanced supercapacitor performance. CQNCH as an electrode material displayed an outstanding specific capacity of 1370.7 F/g at 1 A/g with more than 90.6% capacitance retention after 4000 cycles at 2 A/g. Moreover, the aqueous asymmetric supercapacitor (CQNCH//AC) device was assembled, which displayed an ultrahigh energy density of 108.9 Wh/kg at a power density of 378 W/kg and the capacitance retained 88.1% at 2 A/g after 4000 cycles. What is more, this strategy can be utilized to the controllable fabrication of other rare-earth elements oxides quantum dots doped transition metal hydroxides, which would accelerate the improvement of electrochemical energy storage device.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    We acknowledge the financial supports of Natural Science Program of Nanjing Xiaozhuang University (No. 2018NXY22), 333 High-level Talents Cultivation Project of Jiangsu Province in 2018 (No. BRA2018101).

    Supplementary material related to this article can befound, in the online version, at doi:

    1. [1]

      J. Zhang, J. Liu, L. Xi, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140(2018) 3876-3879. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b00752

    2. [2]

      X.R. Li, J.L. Wei, Q. Li, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 28(2018) 1800886. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201800886

    3. [3]

      S.S. Zheng, B. Li, Y.J. Tang, et al., Nanoscale. 10(2018) 13270-13276. doi: 10.1039/C8NR02932F

    4. [4]

      S.S. Zheng, X.T. Guo, H.G. Xue, et al., Chem. Commun. 55(2019) 10904-10907. doi: 10.1039/C9CC06113D

    5. [5]

      H.Q. Liu, D.P. Zhao, Y. Liu, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 373(2019) 485-492. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.066

    6. [6]

      B. Hu, J.Y. Yuan, J.Y. Tian, et al., J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 531(2018) 148-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.037

    7. [7]

      W. Shi, J. Mao, X. Xu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A. 7(2019) 15654. doi: 10.1039/C9TA04900B

    8. [8]

      X. Xu, W. Shi, W. Liu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A. 6(2018) 24086. doi: 10.1039/C8TA06412A

    9. [9]

      Y. Luo, X. Guo, M. Yuan, et al., ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 7(2019) 8972-8978. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01106

    10. [10]

      H. Zhang, M.U. Tahir, X.L. Yan, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 368(2019) 905-913. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.041

    11. [11]

      B. He, Q.C. Zhang, P. Man, et al., Nano Energy 64(2019) 103935. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103935

    12. [12]

      K.S. Huang, B. Li, M.M. Zhao, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 28(2017) 2195-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.11.010

    13. [13]

      W.H. Zuo, C.Y. Xie, P. Xu, Y.Y. Li, J.P. Liu, Adv. Mater. 29(2017) 1703463. doi: 10.1002/adma.201703463

    14. [14]

      Z. Liang, R. Zhao, T. Qiu, R. Zou, Q. Xu, Energy Fuels 1(2019) 100001.

    15. [15]

      L. Jin, X.X. Li, C.S. Liu, H. Pang, Chin. Chem. Lett. (2019), doi:

    16. [16]

      W.J. Ma, S.H. Chen, S.Y. Yang, et al., J. Power Sources 306(2016) 481-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.063

    17. [17]

      S. Sun, T. Zhai, C.L. Liang, S.V. Savilov, H. Xia, Nano Energy 45(2018) 390-397. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.015

    18. [18]

      Z.H. Wang, D.K. Denis, Z.W. Zhao, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A. 7(2019) 18109-18117. doi: 10.1039/C9TA06432J

    19. [19]

      H. Zhang, H.Y. Li, B. Akram, X. Wang, Nano Res. 12(2019) 1327-1331. doi: 10.1007/s12274-019-2284-0

    20. [20]

      H. Pang, X.R. Li, Q.X. Zhao, et al., Nano Energy 35(2017) 138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.02.044

    21. [21]

      T. Nguyen, M. Boudard, M.J. Carmezim, M.F. Montemor, Sci. Rep. 7(2017) 39980. doi: 10.1038/srep39980

    22. [22]

      S.Q. Wang, Z.Q. Zhu, P.W. Li, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 6(2018) 20015-20024. doi: 10.1039/C8TA05212C

    23. [23]

      Z.L. Wang, Z.W. Zhao, Y.R. Zhang, et al., J. Alloys. Compd. 779(2019) 81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.249

    24. [24]

      T. Wang, S.L. Zhang, X.B. Yan, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(2017) 15510-15524. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b02987

    25. [25]

      X.H. Guan, M.H. Huang, L. Yang, G.S. Wang, X. Guan, Chem. Eng. J. 372(2019) 151-162. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.145

    26. [26]

      Q. Wei, Y.H. Zhao, Q.M. Di, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 121(2017) 6152-6159. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00207

    27. [27]

      D.M. Zumbuhi, J.B. Miller, C.M. Marcus, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(2002) 276803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.276803

    28. [28]

      F. Zhang, H.Z. Zhong, C. Chen, et al., ACS Nano 9(2015) 4533-4542. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01154

    29. [29]

      X.X. Sheng, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, et al., Adv. Mater. 29(2017) 1700150. doi: 10.1002/adma.201700150

    30. [30]

      M.A. Walling, J.A. Novak, J.R.E. Shepard, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 10(2009) 441-491. doi: 10.3390/ijms10020441

    31. [31]

      A. Swarnkar, A.R. Marshall, E.M. Sanehira, et al., Science 354(2016) 92-95. doi: 10.1126/science.aag2700

    32. [32]

      S.J. Xu, D. Li, P.Y. Wu, Adv. Funct. Mater. 25(2015) 1127-1136. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201403863

    33. [33]

      W. Huang, M. Xu, J. Liu, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 29(2019) 1808762. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201808762

    34. [34]

      S.L. Liew, Z. Zhang, T.W.G. Goh, et al., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39(2014) 4291-4298. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.204

    35. [35]

      M.R. Wei, W. Che, H.Z. Li, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 484(2019) 551-559. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.015

    36. [36]

      G. Manibalan, G. Murugadoss, R. Thangamuthu, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 456(2018) 104-113. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.071

    37. [37]

      H.Y. Duan, S.S. Zheng, J. Zhuang, et al., ChemElectroChem 5(2018) 3150-3154. doi: 10.1002/celc.201800992

    38. [38]

      M.C. Biesinger, B.P. Payne, L.W.M. Lau, A. Gerson, R.S.C. Smart, Surf. Interface Anal. 41(2009) 324-332. doi: 10.1002/sia.3026

    39. [39]

      U.M. Patil, S.C. Lee, J.S. Sohn, et al., Electrochim. Acta 129(2014) 334-342. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.063

    40. [40]

      R. Suresh Babu, R. Vinodh, A.L.F. de Barros, et al., Chem. Eng. J. (2019) 390-403.

    41. [41]

      Y.P. Liu, Z.L. Li, L. Yao, et al., Chem. Eng. J. (2019) 550-559.

    42. [42]

      X. Shi, H. Wang, S. Ji, et al., Chem. Eng. J. (2019) 320-327.

    43. [43]

      X.S. Feng, Y. Huang, C. Li, et al., Chem. Eng. J. (2019) 51-60.

    44. [44]

      J. Guo, D.L. Wu, T. Wang, Y. Ma, Appl. Surf. Sci. 475(2019) 56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.095

  • Figure 1  (a) XPS spectrum of CQNCH. (b) High-resolution of Ce 3d XPS spectra.

    Figure 2  (a) XPS spectrum of CQNCH. (b) High-resolution of Ce 3d XPS spectra.

    Figure 3  (a, b) SEM image of the as-prepared CQNCH. (c) TEM image and elements mapping images of CQNCH. (d) TEM image of CQNCH. (e, f) HRTEM image of CQNCH.

    Figure 4  (a) Cyclic voltammetry within a 0.15–0.55 V range at a scan rate 10–50 mV/s on the electrode in 3.0 mol/L KOH at room temperature. (b) Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves with current densities of 0.5–5.0 A/g. (c) Ragone plots of CQNCH// AC compared with those of the previous asymmetric supercapacitors; (d) Charge-discharge cycling test at 2.0 A/g.

  • 加载中
  • PDF下载量:  4
  • 文章访问数:  184
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • 发布日期:  2020-09-15
  • 收稿日期:  2019-12-18
  • 接受日期:  2020-06-01
  • 修回日期:  2020-05-23
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-06-01
通讯作者: 陈斌,
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索