缓解硫化物基全固态电池对压力的依赖性：高镍正极的结构与界面调控策略

引用本文: 张亚娟, 黎晋良, 张希, 李悦, 孙鹏, 徐昊, 潘丽坤. 缓解硫化物基全固态电池对压力的依赖性：高镍正极的结构与界面调控策略[J]. 物理化学学报, 2026, 42(4): 100204. doi: 10.1016/j.actphy.2025.100204 shu

Citation: Yajuan Zhang, Jinliang Li, Xi Zhang, Yue Li, Peng Sun, Hao Xu, Likun Pan. Mitigate pressure dependence in sulfide-based all-solid-state batteries via structural and interfacial engineering of Ni-rich cathodes[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2026, 42(4): 100204. doi: 10.1016/j.actphy.2025.100204 shu

缓解硫化物基全固态电池对压力的依赖性：高镍正极的结构与界面调控策略

张亚娟 ^{1, †,} ,
黎晋良 ^{2, †,} ,
张希 ^{1,
,} ,
李悦 ^3, ,
孙鹏 ^2, ,
徐昊 ^4, ,
潘丽坤 ^{3,
,}

1.
上海交通大学机械与动力工程学院, 上海 200240
2.
暨南大学物理与光电工程学院物理学系, 广东省真空镀膜技术与新能源材料工程技术研究中心, 思源实验室, 广东广州 510632
3.
华东师范大学物理与电子科学学院, 上海磁共振重点实验室, 医学磁共振与分子影像技术研究院, 上海 200241
4.
Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry & Center for Advancing Electronics Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden 01062, Germany

通讯作者: Email: braver1980@sjtu.edu.cn (张希); lkpan@phy.ecnu.edu.cn (潘丽坤)

摘要: 基于硫化物的全固态锂离子电池因其高能量密度和固有安全性而被视为下一代储能技术。然而，其对外部堆叠压力的高度依赖带来了显著挑战，限制了能量效率、结构灵活性及实际应用。本文重点探讨实现低压力操作的关键问题，并系统总结应对这些限制的策略，包括正负极改性、界面工程、电解质优化及操作参数调控。对于高镍层状正极，通过精确控制颗粒尺寸、组成梯度掺杂、孔结构设计以及界面涂层可缓解压力引起的机械降解。优化颗粒尺寸分布和电极-电解质界面化学有助于提升离子传输速率和界面稳定性，而兼具机械柔性与黏附性的先进高分子粘结剂可增强复合电极的机械韧性。在系统层面，通过温度调控、电化学窗口优化及等静压力控制等策略，可进一步增强材料层优化的效果。最后，本文提出跨尺度设计框架，将材料内在工程、动态界面稳定及系统级控制整合，以实现低压或常压下的稳定电池性能，推动全固态锂离子电池从实验研究向实际应用的转化。

关键词:

English

Mitigate pressure dependence in sulfide-based all-solid-state batteries via structural and interfacial engineering of Ni-rich cathodes

Yajuan Zhang ^{1, †,} ,
Jinliang Li ^{2, †,} ,
Xi Zhang ^{1,
,} ,
Yue Li ^3, ,
Peng Sun ^2, ,
Hao Xu ^4, ,
Likun Pan ^{3,
,}

1.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2.
Siyuan Laboratory, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Vacuum Coating Technologies and New Energy Materials, Department of Physics, College of Physics & Optoelectronic Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong Province, China
3.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, School of Physics and Electronic Science, Institute of Magnetic Resonance and Molecular Imaging in Medicine, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
4.
Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry & Center for Advancing Electronics Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden 01062, Germany

Corresponding author: Email: braver1980@sjtu.edu.cn (Xi Zhang); lkpan@phy.ecnu.edu.cn (Likun Pan)

Received Date: 21 July 2025
Accepted Date: 20 October 2025
Revised Date: 08 September 2025
Available Online: 15 April 2026
^†These authors contributed equally.

Abstract: Sulfide-based all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries (ASSLIBs) have emerged as one of the most promising candidates for next-generation energy storage systems owing to their high energy density, wide electrochemical stability window, and intrinsic safety benefits over liquid electrolyte counterparts. Nevertheless, their practical implementation faces a fundamental bottleneck: the strong dependence on high external stack pressure to maintain interfacial contact and suppress mechanical degradation during operation. This requirement not only reduces energy efficiency and packaging flexibility but also severely restricts scalability and commercialization, as maintaining uniform high pressure in large-format cells is technically challenging and economically costly. Addressing the critical challenge of achieving low-pressure or even ambient-pressure operation in sulfide-based ASSLIBs is therefore of both scientific and technological significance. In this review, we systematically analyze the origins of pressure-dependent performance, including particle fracture in Ni-rich layered cathodes, dynamic interfacial instability, and insufficient mechanical compliance of composite electrodes. Building on this mechanistic understanding, we summarize recent advances and design strategies across multiple scales. At the cathode level, particle size regulation, compositional doping, and engineered porosity, combined with conformal interfacial coatings, effectively mitigate stress concentration and suppress degradation. On the electrolyte and electrode interface, optimizing particle size distribution, tailoring interfacial chemistry, and introducing dynamic polymeric binders with balanced adhesion and elasticity significantly enhance ionic transport and maintain robust contact under low pressure. At the system level, strategies such as optimized temperature management, adjustment of the electrochemical window, and controlled isostatic pressure provide additional means to stabilize operation and complement materials-level solutions. Taken together, these advances demonstrate that the key to pressure-independent ASSLIBs lies in a synergistic design framework that integrates intrinsic materials engineering, interfacial stabilization, and system-level control. We further propose a cross-scale design roadmap toward the realization of low-pressure and flexible ASSLIBs, highlighting the need for dynamic adaptation between mechanical properties and electrochemical processes. This perspective underscores that enabling stable performance under minimized external pressure is not only essential for translating laboratory demonstrations into practical large-scale devices but also paves the way for safer, lighter, and more energy-efficient solid-state battery technologies.

Key words:

1. [1]
  J. Oh, S. H. Choi, J. Y. Kim, J. Lee, T. Lee, N. Lee, T. Lee, Y. Sohn, W. J. Chung, K. Y. Bae, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 13 (2023) 2301508. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202301508 doi: 10.1002/aenm.202301508
2. [2]
  R. Zhang, C. Wang, P. Zou, R. Lin, L. Ma, L. Yin, T. Li, W. Xu, H. Jia, Q. Li, et al., Nature 610 (2022) 67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05115-z doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05115-z
3. [3]
  K. L. Kuangyu Wang, Hui Wu, Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 39 (2023) 2301009. https://doi.org/10.3866/pku.Whxb202301009 doi: 10.3866/pku.Whxb202301009
4. [4]
  J. M. Doux, H. Nguyen, D. H. S. Tan, A. Banerjee, X. Wang, E. A. Wu, C. Jo, H. Yang, Y. S. Meng, Adv. Energy Mater. 10 (2019) 1903253. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201903253 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201903253
5. [5]
  A. Banerjee, X. Wang, C. Fang, E. A. Wu, Y. S. Meng, Chem. Rev. 120 (2020) 6878. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101
6. [6]
  Y. Chen, X. Gao, Z. Zhen, X. Chen, L. Huang, D. Zhou, T. Hu, B. Ren, R. Xu, J. Chen, et al., Energy Environm. Sci. 17 (2024) 9288. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ee03289f doi: 10.1039/d4ee03289f
7. [7]
  B. Hennequart, M. Platonova, R. Chometon, T. Marchandier, A. Benedetto, E. Quemin, R. Dugas, C. Lethien, J. -M. Tarascon, ACS Energy Lett. 9 (2024) 454. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c02513 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c02513
8. [8]
  G. Liu, Z. Li, L. Zeng, J. Lin, B. Zheng, H. Liu, L. Chen, F. Wu, Nano Energy 137 (2025) 110798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2025.110798 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2025.110798
9. [9]
  R. Chen, Q. Li, X. Yu, L. Chen, H. Li, Chem. Rev. 120 (2020) 6820. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00268 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00268
10. [10]
  Y. Han, S. H. Jung, H. Kwak, S. Jun, H. H. Kwak, J. H. Lee, S. T. Hong, Y. S. Jung, Adv. Energy Mater. 11 (2021) 2100126. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100126 doi: 10.1002/aenm.202100126
11. [11]
  J. Lee, T. Lee, K. Char, K. J. Kim, J. W. Choi, Acc. Chem. Res. 54 (2021) 3390. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00333 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00333
12. [12]
  S. She, Y. Zhou, Z. Hong, Y. Huang, Y. Wu, ACS Omega 7 (2022) 24851. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03074 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03074
13. [13]
  H. Zheng, S. Peng, S. Liang, W. Yang, C. Chen, C. Wang, R. Yu, Adv. Funct. Mater. 35 (2024) 2418274. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202418274 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202418274
14. [14]
  Y. T. Liu Yuankai, Guo Shaohua, Zhou Haoshen, Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 39 (2023) 2301027. https://doi.org/10.3866/pku.Whxb202301027 doi: 10.3866/pku.Whxb202301027
15. [15]
  X. Gao, B. Liu, B. Hu, Z. Ning, D. S. Jolly, S. Zhang, J. Perera, J. Bu, J. Liu, C. Doerrer, et al., Joule 6 (2022) 636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.008 doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.008
16. [16]
  Q. Wang, Z. Yao, J. Wang, H. Guo, C. Li, D. Zhou, X. Bai, H. Li, B. Li, M. Wagemaker, C. Zhao, Nature 629 (2024) 341. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07362-8 doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07362-8
17. [17]
  Y. Han, Y. Lei, J. Ni, Y. Zhang, Z. Geng, P. Ming, C. Zhang, X. Tian, J. L. Shi, Y. G. Guo, Q. Xiao, Small 18 (2022) e2107048. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202107048 doi: 10.1002/smll.202107048
18. [18]
  K. J. Kim, M. Balaish, M. Wadaguchi, L. Kong, J. L. M. Rupp, Adv. Energy Mater. 11 (2020) 2002689. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202002689 doi: 10.1002/aenm.202002689
19. [19]
  H. H. Sun, H. -H. Ryu, U. -H. Kim, J. A. Weeks, A. Heller, Y. -K. Sun, C. B. Mullins, ACS Energy Lett. 5 (2020) 1136. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00191 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00191
20. [20]
  S. Yin, W. Deng, J. Chen, X. Gao, G. Zou, H. Hou, X. Ji, Nano Energy 83 (2021) 105854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105854 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105854
21. [21]
  J. Kasemchainan, S. Zekoll, D. Spencer Jolly, Z. Ning, G. O. Hartley, J. Marrow, P. G. Bruce, Nat. Mater. 18 (2019) 1105. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-019-0438-9 doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0438-9
22. [22]
  H. Xu, S. Yang, B. Li, Adv. Energy Mater. 14 (2024) 2303539. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202303539 doi: 10.1002/aenm.202303539
23. [23]
  J. Cannarella, C. B. Arnold, J Power Sources 245 (2014) 745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.165 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.165
24. [24]
  J. Zhang, J. Fu, P. Lu, G. Hu, S. Xia, S. Zhang, Z. Wang, Z. Zhou, W. Yan, W. Xia, et al., Adv. Mater. 37 (2025) e2413499. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202413499 doi: 10.1002/adma.202413499
25. [25]
  D. H. S. Tan, Y. S. Meng, J. Jang, Joule 6 (2022) 1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.07.002
26. [26]
  R. Tian, Z. Wang, J. Liao, H. Zhang, D. Song, L. Zhu, L. Zhang, Adv. Energy Mater. 13 (2023) 2300850. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202300850 doi: 10.1002/aenm.202300850
27. [27]
  W. Jiang, X. Fan, X. Zhu, Z. Wu, Z. Li, R. Huang, S. Zhao, X. Zeng, G. Hu, B. Zhang, et al., J Power Sources 508 (2021) 230335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230335 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230335
28. [28]
  T. Liu, L. Yu, J. Lu, T. Zhou, X. Huang, Z. Cai, A. Dai, J. Gim, Y. Ren, X. Xiao, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 6024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26290-z doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26290-z
29. [29]
  H. Gu, J. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Tong, N. Qi, G. Han, M. Zhang, App. Surf. Sci. 539 (2021) 148034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148034 doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148034
30. [30]
  Z. Li, Y. Wang, J. Wang, C. Wu, W. Wang, Y. Chen, C. Hu, K. Mo, T. Gao, Y. S. He, et al., Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 10216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54637-9 doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54637-9
31. [31]
  A. Tron, A. Paolella, A. Beutl, Batteries 9 (2023) 503. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9100503 doi: 10.3390/batteries9100503
32. [32]
  J. H. Choi, T. J. Embleton, K. Ko, H. Jang, Y. Son, J. Park, S. Lee, P. Oh, ChemElectroChem 11 (2024) e202300705. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202300705 doi: 10.1002/celc.202300705
33. [33]
  R. S. Negi, P. Minnmann, R. Pan, S. Ahmed, M. J. Herzog, K. Volz, R. Takata, F. Schmidt, J. Janek, M. T. Elm, Chem. Mater. 33 (2021) 6713. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01123 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01123
34. [34]
  W. Zhao, R. Zhang, F. Ren, L. Karger, S. L. Dreyer, J. Lin, Y. Ma, Y. Cheng, A. S. Pal, M. Velazquez-Rizo, et al., ACS Nano 19 (2025) 8595. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c14322 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c14322
35. [35]
  X. Hu, Q. Xia, F. Yue, X. He, Z. Mei, J. Wang, H. Xia, X. Huang, Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 40 (2024) 2309046. https://doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202309046 doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202309046
36. [36]
  C. Doerrer, I. Capone, S. Narayanan, J. Liu, C. R. M. Grovenor, M. Pasta, P. S. Grant, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 (2021) 37809. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c07952 doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c07952
37. [37]
  D. H. Kim, D. Y. Oh, K. H. Park, Y. E. Choi, Y. J. Nam, H. A. Lee, S. M. Lee, Y. S. Jung, Nano Lett. 17 (2017) 3013. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00330 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00330
38. [38]
  Y. Ma, J. H. Teo, F. Walther, Y. Ma, R. Zhang, A. Mazilkin, Y. Tang, D. Goonetilleke, J. Janek, M. Bianchini, T. Brezesinski, Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 (2022) 2111829. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202111829 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202111829
39. [39]
  Y. -G. Lee, S. Fujiki, C. Jung, N. Suzuki, N. Yashiro, R. Omoda, D. -S. Ko, T. Shiratsuchi, T. Sugimoto, S. Ryu, et al., Nat. Energy 5 (2020) 299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z
40. [40]
  X. Zhou, L. Deng, K. Zhang, Z. Zhang, L. Zhang, Z. Li, T. Kong, Y. Xie, Y. Wang, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 7 (2024) 2524. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.4c00127 doi: 10.1021/acsaem.4c00127
41. [41]
  C. Zou, L. Yang, Z. Zang, X. Tao, L. Yi, X. Chen, X. Liu, X. Zhang, X. Wang, Ceram. Int. 49 (2023) 443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.09.010 doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.09.010
42. [42]
  Y. J. Ji, S. Noh, J. Y. Seong, S. Lee, Y. J. Park, Batteries 9 (2023) 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9060292 doi: 10.3390/batteries9060292
43. [43]
  Y. Li, J. Li, Z. Zeng, X. Xu, J. Cheng, H. Zhang, J. Li, Y. Rao, Y. Deng, L. Ci, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 498 (2024) 155029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.155029 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.155029
44. [44]
  W. Tang, Z. Shu, A. Li, X. Huang, W. Li, Energy Storage Mater. 77 (2025) 104185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2025.104185 doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2025.104185
45. [45]
  G. -T. Park, B. Namkoong, S. -B. Kim, J. Liu, C. S. Yoon, Y. -K. Sun, Nat. Energy 7 (2022) 946. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-022-01106-6 doi: 10.1038/s41560-022-01106-6
46. [46]
  H. H. Sun, U. H. Kim, J. H. Park, S. W. Park, D. H. Seo, A. Heller, C. B. Mullins, C. S. Yoon, Y. K. Sun, Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 6552. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26815-6 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26815-6
47. [47]
  W. Zhao, Y. Zhang, N. Sun, Q. Liu, H. An, Y. Song, B. Deng, J. Wang, G. Yin, F. Kong, et al., ACS Energy Lett. 8 (2023) 5050. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c01840 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c01840
48. [48]
  Y. Chu, S. You, Y. Mu, Y. Hu, Q. Zhang, L. Zou, A. Lai, H. Wang, Q. Deng, F. Peng, et al., ACS Nano 18 (2024) 23380. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c06663 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c06663
49. [49]
  U. -H. Kim, T. -Y. Yu, J. W. Lee, H. U. Lee, I. Belharouak, C. S. Yoon, Y. -K. Sun, ACS Energy Lett. 8 (2023) 809. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02715 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02715
50. [50]
  R. Koerver, W. Zhang, L. de Biasi, S. Schweidler, A. O. Kondrakov, S. Kolling, T. Brezesinski, P. Hartmann, W. G. Zeier, J. Janek, Energy Environm. Sci. 11 (2018) 2142. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ee00907d doi: 10.1039/c8ee00907d
51. [51]
  R. Yang, H. Li, Q. Meng, W. Li, J. Wu, Y. Fang, C. Huang, Y. Cao, Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 40 (2024) 2308053. https://doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB202308053 doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202308053
52. [52]
  J. Sang, B. Tang, Y. Qiu, Y. Fang, K. Pan, Z. Zhou, Energy Environm. Mater. 7 (2023) e12670. https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12670 doi: 10.1002/eem2.12670
53. [53]
  A. Bielefeld, D. A. Weber, R. Rueß, V. Glavas, J. Janek, J. Electrochem. Soc. 169 (2022) 020539. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac50df doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac50df
54. [54]
  E. Schlautmann, A. Weiß, O. Maus, L. Ketter, M. Rana, S. Puls, V. Nickel, C. Gabbey, C. Hartnig, A. Bielefeld, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 13 (2023) 2302309. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202302309 doi: 10.1002/aenm.202302309
55. [55]
  T. Shi, Q. Tu, Y. Tian, Y. Xiao, L. J. Miara, O. Kononova, G. Ceder, Adv. Energy Mater. 10 (2019) 1902881. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201902881 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201902881
56. [56]
  K. Zhou, S. Lu, C. Mish, Y. -T. Chen, S. Feng, J. Kim, M. -S. Song, H. A. Kim, P. Liu, ACS Energy Lett. 10 (2025) 966. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.4c03256 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c03256
57. [57]
  R. Rajagopal, Y. Subramanian, K. S. Ryu, RSC Adv. 11 (2021) 32981. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra05897e doi: 10.1039/d1ra05897e
58. [58]
  X. Zhu, L. Wang, Z. Bai, J. Lu, T. Wu, Nano-Micro Lett. 15 (2023) 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01053-1 doi: 10.1007/s40820-023-01053-1
59. [59]
  M. Liu, E. Lu, S. Wang, S. Feng, J. Gao, W. Yan, J. W. Oh, M. -S. Song, J. Luo, P. Liu, ACS Energy Lett. 10 (2025) 1389. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.4c03387 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c03387
60. [60]
  C. Rosenbach, F. Walther, J. Ruhl, M. Hartmann, T. A. Hendriks, S. Ohno, J. Janek, W. G. Zeier, Adv. Energy Mater. 13 (2022) 2203673.https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202203673 doi: 10.1002/aenm.202203673
61. [61]
  L. Zhang, X. Wu, W. Qian, K. Pan, X. Zhang, L. Li, M. Jia, S. Zhang, Electrochem. Energy Rev. 6 (2023) 36.https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-023-00198-2 doi: 10.1007/s41918-023-00198-2
62. [62]
  J. Grill, J. Popovic-Neuber, ACS Energy Lett. 9 (2024) 4465.https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.4c01684 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c01684
63. [63]
  F. Hippauf, B. Schumm, S. Doerfler, H. Althues, S. Fujiki, T. Shiratsuchi, T. Tsujimura, Y. Aihara, S. Kaskel, Energy Storage Mater. 21 (2019) 390.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.05.033 doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.05.033
64. [64]
  S. Li, Z. Yang, S. -B. Wang, M. Ye, H. He, X. Zhang, C. -W. Nan, S. Wang, Commun. Mater. 5 (2024) 44.https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-024-00482-8 doi: 10.1038/s43246-024-00482-8
65. [65]
  D. Shin, J. S. Nam, C. T. Linh Nguyen, Y. Jo, K. Lee, S. M. Hwang, Y. -J. Kim, J. Mater. Chem. A 10 (2022) 23222.https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ta05021h doi: 10.1039/d2ta05021h
66. [66]
  S. -B. Hong, Y. -J. Lee, U. -H. Kim, C. Bak, Y. M. Lee, W. Cho, H. J. Hah, Y. -K. Sun, D. -W. Kim, ACS Energy Lett. 7 (2022) 1092.https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02756 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02756
67. [67]
  A. Mills, S. Kalnaus, W. -Y. Tsai, Y. -F. Su, E. Williams, X. Zheng, S. Vaidyanathan, D. T. Hallinan, J. Nanda, G. Yang, ACS Energy Lett. 9 (2024) 2677.https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c02813 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c02813
68. [68]
  T. Y. Kwon, K. T. Kim, D. Y. Oh, Y. B. Song, S. Jun, Y. S. Jung, Energy Storage Mater. 49 (2022) 219.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.04.017 doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.04.017
69. [69]
  S. Liu, L. Zhou, J. Han, K. Wen, S. Guan, C. Xue, Z. Zhang, B. Xu, Y. Lin, Y. Shen, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 12 (2022) 2200660.https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202200660 doi: 10.1002/aenm.202200660
70. [70]
  J. Lee, J. W. Choi, EcoMat 4 (2022) e12193.https://doi.org/10.1002/eom2.12193 doi: 10.1002/eom2.12193
71. [71]
  H. Chen, Y. Lu, H. Zhang, Y. Zhou, J. Chen, X. Huang, B. Tian, Chem. Commun. 59 (2023) 7220.https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cc01387a doi: 10.1039/d3cc01387a
72. [72]
  S. Wang, C. Lou, X. Wu, J. Lin, A. Gautam, S. Li, J. Huang, Z. Cheng, S. Zhang, X. Zhang, et al., Matter 8 (2025) 102135.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2025.102135 doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2025.102135
73. [73]
  Z. Li, J. Huang, X. Ren, J. Li, R. Xiao, H. Li, J Power Sources 640 (2025) 236632.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236632 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236632
74. [74]
  K. Wang, X. Song, Z. Chen, X. Cao, F. Wang, X. Zhao, K. Zhang, J Power Sources, 623 (2024) 235452.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235452 doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235452
75. [75]
  N. -Y. Park, G. -T. Park, S. -B. Kim, W. Jung, B. -C. Park, Y. -K. Sun, ACS Energy Lett. 7 (2022) 2362.https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01272 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01272
76. [76]
  H. -H. Ryu, B. Namkoong, J. -H. Kim, I. Belharouak, C. S. Yoon, Y. -K. Sun, ACS Energy Lett. 6 (2021) 2726.https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01089 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01089
77. [77]
  F. B. Spingler, S. Friedrich, S. Kücher, S. Schmid, D. López-Cruz, A. Jossen, J. Electrochem. Soc. 168 (2021) 110515.https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac33e1 doi: 10.1149/1945-7111/ac33e1
78. [78]
  S. -Y. Ham, H. Yang, O. Nunez-cuacuas, D. H. S. Tan, Y. -T. Chen, G. Deysher, A. Cronk, P. Ridley, J. -M. Doux, E. A. Wu, et al., Energy Storage Mater. 55 (2023) 455.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.12.013 doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.12.013
79. [79]
  C. Lee, J. Y. Kim, K. Y. Bae, T. Kim, S. -J. Jung, S. Son, H. -W. Lee, Energy Storage Mater. 66 (2024) 103196.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2024.103196 doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2024.103196
80. [80]
  Y. T. Chen, J. Jang, J. A. S. Oh, S. Y. Ham, H. Yang, D. J. Lee, M. Vicencio, J. B. Lee, D. H. S. Tan, M. Chouchane, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 14 (2024) 2304327.https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202304327 doi: 10.1002/aenm.202304327
81. [81]
  D. J. Lee, Y. Jeon, J. P. Lee, L. Zhang, K. H. Koh, F. Li, A. U. Mu, J. Wu, Y. T. Chen, S. McNulty, et al., Nat. Commun. 16 (2025) 4200.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59363-4 doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59363-4
82. [82]
  Y. Sakka, H. Yamashige, A. Watanabe, A. Takeuchi, M. Uesugi, K. Uesugi, Y. Orikasa, J. Mater. Chem. A 10 (2022) 16602.https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ta02378d doi: 10.1039/d2ta02378d
83. [83]
  P. Chen, H. Qu, D. Zheng, X. Zhang, D. Qu, Adv. Funct. Mater. 35 (2025) 2423633.https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202423633 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202423633
84. [84]
  Y. -S. Li, Y. -L. Ye, Z. -X. Xie, X. -D. Zhang, X. -S. Zhang, C. -H. Ke, Z. -H. Zhang, R. Wen, H. Yang, H. Ye, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147 (2025) 36244.https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c09355 doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c09355
85. [85]
  S. Farzanian, J. Vazquez Mercado, I. Shozib, N. Sivadas, V. Lacivita, Y. Wang, Q. H. Tu, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 6 (2023) 9615.https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.3c01681 doi: 10.1021/acsaem.3c01681
86. [86]
  X. -Z. Fan, J. -H. Zhang, X. -H. Zhou, J. -X. Chen, Y. -Q. Shi, G. Kalimuldina, F. Wang, A. Belgibayeva, L. Kong, J. Energy Chem. 105 (2025) 454.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2025.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2025.02.004
87. [87]
  X. Wu, M. Wang, H. Pan, X. Sun, S. Tang, H. Zhou, P. He, Nano-Micro Lett. 17 (2025) 239.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-025-01751-y doi: 10.1007/s40820-025-01751-y
88. [88]
  K. Tuo, C. Sun, S. Liu, Electrochem. Energy Rev. 6 (2023) 17.https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-023-00179-5 doi: 10.1007/s41918-023-00179-5
89. [89]
  S. A. Han, J. H. Suh, M. -S. Park, J. H. Kim, Electrochem. Energy Rev. 8 (2025) 5.https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-025-00240-5 doi: 10.1007/s41918-025-00240-5

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 0
文章访问数: 319
HTML全文浏览量: 41

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

缓解硫化物基全固态电池对压力的依赖性：高镍正极的结构与界面调控策略

通讯作者: Email: braver1980@sjtu.edu.cn (张希); lkpan@phy.ecnu.edu.cn (潘丽坤)

English

Mitigate pressure dependence in sulfide-based all-solid-state batteries via structural and interfacial engineering of Ni-rich cathodes

Corresponding author: Email: braver1980@sjtu.edu.cn (Xi Zhang); lkpan@phy.ecnu.edu.cn (Likun Pan)

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

缓解硫化物基全固态电池对压力的依赖性：高镍正极的结构与界面调控策略

通讯作者: Email: braver1980@sjtu.edu.cn (张希); lkpan@phy.ecnu.edu.cn (潘丽坤)

English

Mitigate pressure dependence in sulfide-based all-solid-state batteries via structural and interfacial engineering of Ni-rich cathodes

Corresponding author: Email: braver1980@sjtu.edu.cn (Xi Zhang); lkpan@phy.ecnu.edu.cn (Likun Pan)

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs