English

• Excessive emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂), stemming from the combustion of fossil fuels, are deemed major contributors to the greenhouse effect [1–3]. To the best of our understanding, CO₂ also serves as a valuable resource the production of fine chemicals, beverage additives, and other fields [4,5]. Recent studies have confirmed that CO₂ capture and storage (CCS) would be a potential method for carbon reduction [6]. A myriad of capture adsorption techniques and materials have been studied to CO₂ capture [7–9]. Thereinto, solid adsorbent was believed to be the most potential one with considerations to their simple preparation, good repeatability and stability [10]. However, these adsorbents have shortcomings of poor selectivity or low adsorption capacity. Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop novel solid adsorbents that enhance CO₂ capture efficiency.

  To investigate the practical separation efficacy of adsorbents, there is a significant emphasis on enhancing the CO₂ capacity with selectivity for CO₂ over N₂ and CH₄. Additionally, factors such as stability and regenerability are crucial in adsorbent development [11,12]. Recently, solid amine adsorbents obtained by grafting or impregnating porous silica with organic amines, have garnered attention due to their superior physical and chemical properties, which are notably characterized by high selectivity, easy regeneration and potential prospects of CO₂ capture [13–16]. This has the potential to significantly enhance the adsorption process compared to raw porous materials. The adsorption capacity of CO₂ and selectivity of porous solid amine adsorbents may be contingent upon factors such as specific surface area, pore volume, porosity, and the interaction between gas molecules and active sites within the main skeleton groups. Notably, pore volume and active sites are crucial for the adsorption capacity, particularly in the context of selective adsorption [17,18]. However, how to optimize the design scheme for high adsorption capacity along with its selectivity is still a great challenge [19]. In the separation of CO₂ from N₂ and CH₄, the similarity in molecular sizes and intermolecular interactions plays a significant role [20]. All previously reported studies have clearly indicated that the strategic introduction of low-density molecules and organic amines into porous adsorbents may serve as a feasible method for synthesizing materials with high CO₂ adsorption capacity. Additionally, these materials can selectively separate CO₂/N₂ and CO₂/CH₄ gases [21–23].

  Herein, in view of previous studies on pillar[5]arenes [24–27], we reported a novel amine-pillar[5]arene based solid amine adsorbent, named DETA-P5S, which constructed from bromo-pillar[5]arene (BE-P5), diethylenetriamine (DETA) and porous silica as shown in Fig. 1a and Fig. S1 (Supporting information). Subsequently, the adsorption process of CO₂ and selectivity separation for CO₂ over N₂ and CH₄ on DETA-P5S were performed on a fixed-bed (Fig. 1b). The physicochemical properties of adsorbents were systematically studied by FT-IR, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), BET, XPS, MIP, etc. The effects of gas flow rate, amount, adsorption temperature, and adsorption mechanism on CO₂ adsorption process were also investigated.

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  (a) Synthesis of DETA-P5S. (b) Schematic diagram of fixed-bed (FD-2000) reactor for CO₂ capture.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In FT-IR spectra, a broad band at 3550~3300 cm⁻¹ was referred to the stretching vibration of N−H and Si−OH. The peaks at 2933 and 2856 cm⁻¹ were assigned to symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibration corresponding to C−H bonds, respectively. The peak at 1634 cm⁻¹ was identified as the stretching vibration of C=C on benzene ring, which indicated the successful introduction of BE-P5. Additionally, peaks at 1506 and 1240 cm⁻¹ were attributed to the N−H deformation vibration of aliphatic secondary amines and C—N stretching vibration, respectively, which confirmed the successful modification of DETA. The peaks at 1095, 807 and 466 cm⁻¹ were characteristic vibrational peaks of Si−O−Si bonds. These data confirmed the successful preparation of DETA-P5S (Fig. 2a). SEM exhibited agglomerating morphology of silica particles with rough surface and apparent silica pore (Fig. 2b). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) investigation revealed that there was significant pore structure of silica particle stacking in DETA-P5S (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). TGA curves of NH₂-Sil, BE-P5S, and DETA-P5S under N₂ flow were examined and presented in Fig. 2c. The findings indicated that pristine NH₂-Sil has high thermal stability in a protective atmosphere, the weight loss was only 6.62% even after being heated to 750 ℃. The DETA-P5S also exhibited excellent thermal stability until the temperature reached 260 ℃, a more rapid decrease stage for the quality of BE-P5S and DETA-P5S was appeared in the temperature range of 260–750 ℃. This could be attributed to the decomposition, combustion and volatilization of BE-P5 or DETA within the adsorbents. Ultimately, the loss rate of BE-P5S and DETA-P5S were 11.69% and 15.54%, which indicated that the bonding amount of BE-P5 and DETA were reached 5.07% and 3.85%, respectively. The N₂ adsorption-desorption isotherms and BJH pore size distribution curves of DETA-P5S was shown in Fig. 2d, it can be found that DETA-P5S has a typical Ⅳ type of N₂ desorption curves with a large surface area of 231.65 m²/g, which indicated DETA-P5S has mesoporous pore structure. In addition, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirmed the presence of C, N, O, and Si elements (Fig. 2e). Elemental analysis (EA) also showed that the content of DETA-P5S for N, C, H reached 2.68%, 13.28% and 1.63% (Table S1 in Supporting information), confirmed the successful grafting of DETA on BE-P5S. Moreover, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis in SEM shows that O, C, and N elements were uniformly distributed over DETA-P5S (Fig. S5 in Supporting information). Mercury intrusion porosimetry revealed that the total pore volume of DETA-P5S was 1.66 cm³/g, with a pore size was 77.17 nm. The porosity reached 67.73%, which provided favorable conditions for the adsorption of CO₂ (Fig. 2f). While large pores formed may be the pores between porous silica in aggregate granulation, and the mesoporous pores originate from the porous silica.

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  Characterization of adsorbents: (a) FT-IR spectra of NH₂-Sil, BE-P5, BE-P5S, and DETA-P5S, (b) SEM of DETA-P5S, (c) TG of NH₂-Sil, BE-P5S, and DETA-P5S, (d) N₂ adsorption/desorption isotherms of DETA-P5S, (e) XPS of DETA-P5S, (f) MIA of DETA-P5S.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The evaluation of CO₂ adsorption process was conducted using a fixed-bed (FD-2000) reactor, equipped with a 6 mm diameter quartz reaction tube. The saturation adsorption capacity of CO₂ was determined by utilizing the breakthrough curve according to Zhao et al. [28]. The adsorbent was first treated for 50 min at 120 ℃ with a flow rate of 20 mL/min Ar to remove pre-adsorbed residual solvents, then adjusted to corresponding adsorption conditions and carried out CO₂ adsorption process. An adsorption cycle was considered complete when the outlet CO₂ concentration matched the inlet concentration. Subsequently, Ar was purged again to desorption at 120 ℃ for 50 min, then proceed to the next CO₂ adsorption at corresponding requirements. Throughout the experiment, the CO₂ concentration of the reactor outlet was measured using gas chromatography, coupled with a TCD detector.

  In order to investigate the optimal adsorption capacity of DETA-P5S for CO₂, the breakthrough curves were measured at different factors like flow rates, amount of adsorbent, adsorption temperatures, and different adsorbents. The effect of flow rate on the breakthrough curve of DETA-P5S was operated as Fig. 3a. It was found that the CO₂ saturation adsorption capacity for CO₂ reached 7.4 mmol/g when 0.2 g of DETA-P5S at a flow rate of 10 mL/min. However, both the breakthrough time and saturation adsorption capacity for CO₂ declined as the gas flow rate increased. It may be that working at a faster gas flow rate reduced the retention time of CO₂ gas in the fixed bed, thus resulted in a decrease of adsorption, eventually leaded to earlier breakthrough times, these characteristics are consistent with the reports [29].

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  (a) Effect of gas flow rate for CO₂ adsorption capacity of DETA-P5S. (b) Effect of DETA-P5S amount for CO₂ adsorption capacity. (c) Effect of adsorption temperature for CO₂ adsorption capacity. (d) CO₂ adsorption capacity of different adsorbents.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Subsequently, the effect of DETA-P5S amount for CO₂ adsorption capacity was investigated with flow rate of 10 mL/min at 30 ℃ (Fig. 3b), and the breakthrough time was shortened and the CO₂ saturated adsorption capacity decreased with the increase of DETA-P5S increased from 0.2 g to 0.8 g. Based on the basis of adsorption mechanism, the adsorption capacity of acid gas may depend on the amine proportion in DETA-P5S. It could be concluded that a certain amount of DETA-P5S could enhance CO₂ adsorption capacity for dominant adsorption mode. However, when too much adsorbent was packed, the column height of the adsorbent increased, and the diffusion resistance of CO₂ through the adsorbent pores was increased accordingly, which reduced the contact time between CO₂ and the active amine of the internal adsorbent. As a result, the saturation adsorption capacity was reduced. Therefore, the saturation adsorption capacity of CO₂ is related to the amount of DETA-P5S in specific reaction tubes.

  Temperature significantly influences the CO₂ adsorption capacity, Fig. 3c represented the effect of adsorption temperature on CO₂ adsorption capacity from 30 ℃ to 60 ℃ on 0.2 g DETA-P5S at a 10 mL/min flow rate. the results revealed that the CO₂ saturation adsorption capacity of DETA-P5S reached 9.1 mmol/g when the temperature at 40 ℃, however, further temperature increases lead to a decrease in adsorption capacity, these results indicated that the adsorption of CO₂ to EDTA-P5S may be a kinetics-controlled process. When increased the temperature, the diffusion resistance of CO₂ decreases, the structure of alkyl chain in DETA-P5S stretched and exposed more active site, which leads to a significant increase in CO₂ capture capacity. However, with the further increased of temperature, the desorption of CO₂ from the adsorption site in the pore may become more priority, resulting in the reduction of CO₂ adsorption capacity. Therefore, DETA-P5S at 40 ℃ was an important factor as a candidate material for CO₂ adsorption.

  Furthermore, with multiple modification in synthesis process, the CO₂ adsorption capacity may be different. To examine the impact of DETA derivatives on adsorption capacity, we investigated the CO₂ adsorption capacity of control adsorbents NH₂-Sil and BE-P5S (Fig. 3d). The saturated adsorption capacity of CO₂ on DETA-P5S was found to be the highest when compared to the other two adsorbents. The results indicated that the introduction of DETA on pillar[5]arene bonded porous silica greatly enhanced the adsorption capacity of CO₂. Considering the great change of CO₂ adsorption capacity after the introduction of DETA and BE-P5, this method can provide a new strategy for the development of CO₂ solid amine adsorbent.

  To further assess the practical separation performance of DETA-P5S, the effect of temperature on dynamic adsorption performance selectivities of DETA-P5S for CO₂/N₂ and CO₂/CH₄ were evaluated through breakthrough tests, respectively. The two ternary gas mixtures CO₂/N₂/Ar and CO₂/CH₄/Ar with a composition of 5/5/90 were used at a flow rate of 10 mL/min at 30~60 ℃. The adsorption time of CO₂ in whole adsorption process was longer than that of N₂ and CH₄, indicated that the adsorption capacity of CO₂ was strong, and the breakthrough time was longer than that of N₂ and CH₄. The breakthrough curve clearly shown that DETA-P5S has good separation potential for CO₂ over N₂ and CH₄. The dynamic saturation adsorption capacities of DETA-P5S were 7.11 (0.37) and 6.18 (0.44) mmol/g for CO₂/N₂ (Figs. 4a and b) and CO₂/CH₄ (Figs. 4c and d), respectively, both the gas mixtures showed high separation selectivity. These results have demonstrated that DETA-P5S is a promising absorbent for the adsorption of CO₂ in preference to CH₄ and N₂.

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  (a) Effect of temperature on selectivity of CO₂/N₂ for DETA-P5S. (b) Saturated adsorption capacity and selectivity of CO₂/N₂. (c) Effect of temperature on selectivity of CO₂/CH₄ for DETA-P5S. (d) Saturated adsorption capacity and selectivity factor of CO₂/CH₄.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  As an excellent adsorbent, in addition to high absorption capacity and selective separation, there are advantages of stability at cyclic adsorption. During operation, the adsorption temperature of 40 ℃ and desorption temperature of 110 ℃ were performed for DETA-P5S in CO₂ cyclic adsorption capacity (Fig. 5a), the study concluded that the adsorption capacity of CO₂ diminished from 8.4 mmol/g to 7.6 mmol/g following 15 cycles of adsorption and desorption, yet it still retained an exceptionally high CO₂ adsorption capacity. The findings suggested that DETA-P5S could be effectively utilized in cyclic CO₂ adsorption operations.

  Figure 5

  

  Figure 5.  (a) The cyclic CO₂ adsorption of DETA-P5S. (b) Two-dimensional in situ IR spectrum of DETA-P5S. (c) Solid-state ¹³C MAS NMR spectrum of DETA-P5S. (d) Reaction mechanism for DETA-P5S with CO₂.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In situ infrared spectroscopy was employed to study the adsorption mechanism of CO₂ on DETA-P5S. As shown in Fig. 5b and Fig. S6 (Supporting information), the intensity of stretching vibration at 3728~3533 cm⁻¹ was confirmed to be due to the binding effect between CO₂ and –OH on silicas. The peak at 3345 cm⁻¹ was the asymmetric stretching vibration peak of NH₂, and the peak at 3231 cm⁻¹ was the symmetric stretching vibration peak of NH₂ and NH. Peak at 3105 cm⁻¹ was the stretching vibration of N—H. The intensity of stretching vibration at 2381 cm⁻¹ and 2290 cm⁻¹ were thought to be stretching vibration of CO₂, the peak at 2170 cm⁻¹ was the vibration peak of NH₂⁺–COO⁻. Peaks at 1711 cm⁻¹ was vibration adsorption peaks of C=O bond in –NCOOH. Peak at 1697 cm⁻¹ is the deformation vibration peak of NH₃⁺. Peaks at 1557~1553 cm⁻¹ were the stretching vibration peak of COO⁻. Peak at 1516 cm⁻¹ was the stretching vibration peak of C—N, and peaks at 651 cm⁻¹ was assigned for CO₂ deformation vibration. The adsorption peaks of NH₃⁺ and NH₂⁺ gradually intensified mainly because CO₂ reacted with NH₂ and NH. This was consistent with dynamic CO₂ adsorption mechanism of solid amine adsorbent [30–32]. Consequently, the CO₂ adsorption of adsorbent follows anionic and cationic mechanisms on DETA-P5S, finally forming ammonium ions and carbamate.

  Solid-state ¹³C MAS NMR spectrum was further conducted to investigate the adsorption mechanism for whether there was a formation of carbamate (Fig. 5c), the distinct resonance at 168 ppm indicated the formation of carbamate after adsorbed CO₂ by DETA-P5S. Therefore, DETA-P5S has the ability to selectively adsorption of CO₂, as well as the amide and hydroxyl group in its framework have a synergistic effect, they play an important role in the interaction with CO₂ in both chemisorption and physisorption (Fig. 5d). Lastly, the pseudo-first-order model, pseudo-second-order model and Avrami kinetic model were fitted to the adsorption process, the results suggested that the Avrami model can accurately predict the adsorption kinetics of DETA-P5S, the correlation coefficient of R² was above 0.9977 and the adsorption process has both physical and chemical adsorption, but physical adsorption plays a dominant role in the adsorption process (Fig. S7 and Table S2 in Supporting information) [7].

  In conclusion, a novel amine-pillar[5]arene functionalized CO₂ porous adsorbents (DETA-P5S) with high CO₂ adsorption capacity was prepared for selective separation CO₂ over N₂ and CH₄. The DETA-P5S preferentially adsorbs CO₂ over N₂ and CH₄ for its primary and secondary amine with a weakly nucleophilic property, which were able to interact with CO₂. The effects of gas flow rate, amount of adsorbent, and adsorption temperature on CO₂ adsorption capacities were systematic studied. The DETA-P5S has the optimal capture amount of 9.1 mmol/g with 5 vol% CO₂ flow rates at 40 ℃, which indicated that the introduction of DETA provided amino active sites, while the cavity of pillar[5]arene provided capture pores, thereby promoting CO₂ adsorption. Moreover, the dynamic saturation adsorption capacities of DETA-P5S were 7.11 (0.37) and 6.18 (0.44) mmol/g for CO₂/N₂ and CO₂/CH₄, respectively, both the gas mixtures showed high separation selectivity. Simultaneously, the DETA-P5S also maintained an outstanding CO₂ adsorption capacity even after ten regeneration cycles. In-situ FTIR and solid-state ¹³C MAS NMR spectrum confirmed that the CO₂ adsorption process on DETA-P5S was consistent with zwitterionic mechanism. This study demonstrates that amine-pillar[5]arene solid porous adsorbent with organic amine modification and could provide a facile protocol for the challenging CO₂ capture.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  Acknowledgments

  The authors are thankful for financial supports from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22204169), Gansu Natural Science Foundation (Nos. 23JRRA619, 21JR7RA076) and Scientific and Technological Program of Chengguan District, Lanzhou (No. 2023JSCX0037).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109659.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     L. Zhang, S.H. Lin, Y.P. Liu, et al., Inorg. Chem. 62 (2023) 8058–8063. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01055

  2. [2]

     M.M. Abdelnaby, N.A.A. Qasem, B.A. Al-Maythalony, et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7 (2019) 13941–13948. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02334

  3. [3]

     M. Breunig, M. Dorner, J. Senker, J. Mater. Chem. A 9 (2021) 12797–12806. doi: 10.1039/D0TA12426E

  4. [4]

     L. Li, N. Zhao, W. Wei, et al., Fuel 108 (2013) 112–130. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.08.022

  5. [5]

     S. Ravi, J. Kim, Y. Choi, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 11 (2023) 1190–1199. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c06621

  6. [6]

     J.J. Dai, D.Y. Xie, Y. Liu, et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59 (2020) 7866–7874. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c00447

  7. [7]

     G.J. Zhang, P.Y. Zhao, L.X. Hao, et al., Sep. Purif. Technol. 209 (2019) 516–527. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.074

  8. [8]

     M.M. Zhang, L. Chen, Z.Y. Yuan, et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 62 (2023) 8902–8910. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c01083

  9. [9]

     E. Jeon, S.Y. Moon, J.S. Bae, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 1318–1323. doi: 10.1002/anie.201508367

  10. [10]

      G.J. Zhang, P.Y. Zhao, L.X. Hao, et al., J. CO2 Util. 24 (2018) 22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.12.006

  11. [11]

      A.M. Varghese, G.N. Karanikolos, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 96 (2020) 103005. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103005

  12. [12]

      L.J. Wei, W. Wei, N. Xue, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 (2021) 5814–5822. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c19907

  13. [13]

      K.S.K. Reddy, A.M. Varghese, A.E. Ogungbenro, et al., ACS Appl. Eng. Mater. 1 (2023) 720–733. doi: 10.1021/acsaenm.2c00136

  14. [14]

      Y. Le, D. Guo, B. Cheng, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 408 (2013) 173–180. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.07.014

  15. [15]

      G.J. Zhang, P.Y. Zhao, Y. Xu, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 54 (2017) 59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.05.018

  16. [16]

      G.J. Zhang, P.Y. Zhao, Y. Xu, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 (2018) 34340–34354. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b13069

  17. [17]

      J. Lu, J. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A 2 (2014) 13831–13834. doi: 10.1039/C4TA03015J

  18. [18]

      B. Zhang, G.Y. Li, J. Yan, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 119 (2015) 13080–13087. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02806

  19. [19]

      S. Bali, J. Leisen, G.S. Foo, et al., ChemSusChem 7 (2014) 3145–3156. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201402373

  20. [20]

      D.V. Quang, A. Dindi, M.R.M. Abu-Zahra, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5 (2017) 3170–3178. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02961

  21. [21]

      J. Peng, Z. Liu, Y. Wu, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14 (2022) 21089–21097. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c04779

  22. [22]

      K.K. Wang, H.L. Huang, D.H. Liu, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (2016) 4869–4876. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00425

  23. [23]

      M. Babaei, S. Salehi, M. Anbia, et al., J. Chem. Eng. Data 63 (2018) 1657–1662. doi: 10.1021/acs.jced.8b00014

  24. [24]

      H. Li, Y.R. Zhu, B.B. Shi, et al., Chin. J. Chem. 33 (2015) 373–378. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201400882

  25. [25]

      H. Li, K.J. Quan, X. Yang, et al., Trends Anal. Chem. 131 (2020) 116026. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.116026

  26. [26]

      H. Li, X.P. Wang, C.X. Shi, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107606. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.029

  27. [27]

      C.X. Shi, H. Li, X.F. Shi, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 3613–3622. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.010

  28. [28]

      P.Y. Zhao, G.J. Zhang, Y. Xua, J. CO2 Util. 34 (2019) 543–557. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.08.001

  29. [29]

      R. Sabouni, H. Kazemian, S. Rohani, Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013) 9372–9380. doi: 10.1021/es401276r

  30. [30]

      Y. Zhai, S.S.C. Chuang, Energy Technol. 53 (2017) 510–519.

  31. [31]

      P.Y. Zhao, G.J. Zhang, Y. Xu, et al., Energy Fuels 33 (2019) 3357–3369. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b04278

  32. [32]

      G.S. Foo, J.J. Lee, C.H. Chen, et al., ChemSusChem 10 (2017) 266–276. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201600809

• 

  Figure 1  (a) Synthesis of DETA-P5S. (b) Schematic diagram of fixed-bed (FD-2000) reactor for CO₂ capture.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  Characterization of adsorbents: (a) FT-IR spectra of NH₂-Sil, BE-P5, BE-P5S, and DETA-P5S, (b) SEM of DETA-P5S, (c) TG of NH₂-Sil, BE-P5S, and DETA-P5S, (d) N₂ adsorption/desorption isotherms of DETA-P5S, (e) XPS of DETA-P5S, (f) MIA of DETA-P5S.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  (a) Effect of gas flow rate for CO₂ adsorption capacity of DETA-P5S. (b) Effect of DETA-P5S amount for CO₂ adsorption capacity. (c) Effect of adsorption temperature for CO₂ adsorption capacity. (d) CO₂ adsorption capacity of different adsorbents.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  (a) Effect of temperature on selectivity of CO₂/N₂ for DETA-P5S. (b) Saturated adsorption capacity and selectivity of CO₂/N₂. (c) Effect of temperature on selectivity of CO₂/CH₄ for DETA-P5S. (d) Saturated adsorption capacity and selectivity factor of CO₂/CH₄.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 5  (a) The cyclic CO₂ adsorption of DETA-P5S. (b) Two-dimensional in situ IR spectrum of DETA-P5S. (c) Solid-state ¹³C MAS NMR spectrum of DETA-P5S. (d) Reaction mechanism for DETA-P5S with CO₂.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
•