Synthesis, fluorescence, and magnetic characterization of nicotinic acid ligand-based dysprosium, holmium, erbium, and thulium complexes

Lin-Tao YU Qi-Yang LI Zhi SHEN Wen-Jun Lü Qiang ZHAO

Citation:  Lin-Tao YU, Qi-Yang LI, Zhi SHEN, Wen-Jun Lü, Qiang ZHAO. Synthesis, fluorescence, and magnetic characterization of nicotinic acid ligand-based dysprosium, holmium, erbium, and thulium complexes[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2023, 39(11): 2181-2187. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2023.187 shu

基于多羧酸烟酸配体的镝、钬、铒和铥配合物的合成及荧光、磁学性质的表征

    通讯作者: 赵强, zhaoqiang0522@126.com
摘要: 以5-(4-羧基苯氧基)烟酸配体(H2cpna)和稀土金属离子Dy3+、Ho3+、Er3+和Tm3+为原料,采用水热法合成了4种稀土金属配合物[M(Hcpna)(cpna)(H2O)3]n,其中M=Dy(1)、Ho(2)、Er(3)、Tm(4)。单晶X射线衍射分析表明配合物1234为同构配合物,均为一维链状结构。通过红外、元素分析以及粉末X射线衍射对所得配合物进行了表征,同时对配合物的荧光和磁学性质开展了研究。荧光测试结果表明,配合物1~4的荧光强度均低于配体H2cpna的荧光强度。在2~300 K温度范围内1 kOe直流电场下测试了配合物1~4的磁性,结果表明配合物1234χmT值分别为14.04、14.15、11.08和6.83 cm3·mol-1·K,与文献理论值相符合。

English

  • Rare earth metals are called "Industrial Monosodium Glutamate" and "Treasure House" of new materials in today′s society. They can form many different new materials with different properties, and many materials are widely used in all walks of life[1-5]. As a special kind of inorganic ions, rare earth ions have excellent optical, electrical, and magnetic properties. Wilkinson and Brightan successfully synthesized the first rare earth metal-organic complex (tricycline rare earth compound) in 1954, marking the birth of rare earth metal organic chemistry. After that, many excellent studies on rare earth complexes have been reported, so the research on rare earth coordination compounds is particularly important[6-9]. Based on the 4f electronic structure of rare earth ions, rare earth complexes have important potential applications in optical, magnetic, and other fields. Among these properties, the magnetic properties of rare earth complexes have been extensively studied[10-11]. The high magnetic moment and strong magnetic anisotropy of rare earth ions provide the basis for them as the magnetic functional unit of molecular nanomagnets. However, due to the changeable coordination configuration of rare earth ions, the reasonable design and synthesis of rare earth complexes are still very challenging. In this paper, we report our discovery of four new rare earth complexes based on Dy3+, Ho3+, Er3+, and Tm3+ and 5-(4-carboxyphenoxy) nicotinic acid ligand (H2cpna)[12-13]. Furthermore, the fluorescence and magnetic properties of the complexes were investigated at room temperature.

    All chemicals of reagent grade were commercially available and used without purification. The H2cpna ligand was purchased from Jinan Camolai Trading Company (Jinan, China); Dy(NO3)3·6H2O, Ho(NO3)3·6H2O, Er(NO3)3·6H2O, and Tm(NO3)3·6H2O were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biological Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The experimental water was distilled water.

    Elemental analyses (C, H, and N) were performed using a Perkin-Elmer 2400 element analyzer. IR spectra were recorded in a range of 400-4000 cm-1 using a VECTOR-22 spectrometer using KBr discs. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were recorded on a Bruker (D8 Advance) diffractometer for a Cu-target tube and a graphite monochromator (voltage: 40 kV, current: 40 mA, incident ray wavelength: 0.154 06 nm, scanning range: 5°-90°). The simulated PXRD patterns were obtained by the single-crystal data and diffraction-crystal module of the Mercury program. A thermal analyzer (TG-DSC, STA449F3, Germany) was applied to investigate the thermal stability of the sample under a nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 ℃·min-1. Fluorescence tests were carried out on a Varian Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrometer. Magnetic data were collected by a Quantum Design SQUID-VSM magnetometer.

    A mixture of H2cpna (0.25 mmol), M(NO3)3·6H2O (0.5 mmol), NaOH (0.45 mmol), and distilled H2O (10 mL) was stirred magnetically for 5 min at room temperature, then was sealed in a 25 mL Teflon-lined autoclave and heated to 120 ℃ at a rate of 10.8 ℃·h-1. After maintaining for 72 h, the reaction vessel was cooled to 20 ℃ at a rate of 5 ℃·h-1. Light yellow crystals were collected.

    [Dy(Hcpna)(cpna)(H2O)3]n (1): 45% yield based on H2cpna. Elemental Anal. Calcd. for DyC26H21N2O13(%): C, 42.66; H, 2.89; N, 3.83. Found(%): C, 42.98; H, 2.61; N, 4.59. FTIR (KBr pellets, cm-1): 1 684, 1 599, 1 551, 1 504, 1 463, 1 408, 1 315, 1 298, 1 259, 1 208, 1 163, 1 024, 963, 909, 878, 853, 794, 763, 707.

    [Ho(Hcpna)(cpna)(H2O)3]n (2): 76% yield based on H2cpna. Elemental Anal. Calcd. for HoC26H21N2O13(%): C, 42.52; H, 2.88; N, 3.81. Found(%): C, 42.38; H, 2.91; N, 4.19. FTIR (KBr pellets, cm-1): 1 685, 1 602, 1 545, 1 505, 1 460, 1 408, 1 316, 1 300, 1 259, 1 211, 1 179, 1 165, 1 025, 965, 905, 874, 854, 802, 769, 708.

    [Er(Hcpna)(cpna)(H2O)3]n (3): 63% yield based on H2cpna. Elemental Anal. Calcd. for ErC26H21N2O13(%): C, 42.38; H, 2.87; N, 3.80. Found(%): C, 42.16; H, 3.06; N, 4.20. FTIR (KBr pellets, cm-1): 1 682, 1 602, 1 546, 1 506, 1 459, 1 406, 1 316, 1 299, 1 258, 1 213, 1 179, 1 165, 1 025, 965, 905, 872, 857, 799, 766, 706.

    [Tm(Hcpna)(cpna)(H2O)3]n (4): 57% yield based on H2cpna. Elemental Anal. Calcd. for TmC26H21N2O13(%): C, 42.29; H, 2.87; N, 3.79. Found(%): C, 42.58; H, 2.49; N, 3.63. FTIR (KBr pellets, cm-1): 1 687, 1 601, 1 547, 1 507, 1 460, 1 407, 1 316, 1 301, 1 259, 1 215, 1 179, 1 165, 1 027, 965, 904, 875, 854, 801, 769, 706.

    Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data for complexes 1-4 were collected on a Bruker SMART APEX-Ⅱ CCD diffractometer equipped with a graphite-monochromated Mo radiation (λ=0.071 073 nm) at 293(2) K using an ω-φ scan mode. Absorption corrections were applied by using the SADABS program[14]. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares techniques on F2 with the SHELX-2018 package[15]. The H atoms of the ligands were generated theoretically on the specific atoms and refined isotropically with fixed thermal factors. Detailed crystallographic data of complexes 1-4 are summarized in Table 1.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Crystallographic data for complexes 1-4
    下载: 导出CSV
    Parameter 1 2 3 4
    Chemical formula DyC26H21N2O13 HoC26H21N2O13 ErC26H21N2O13 TmC26H21N2O13
    Formula weight 731.95 734.38 736.71 738.38
    Space group P1 P1 P1 P1
    a / nm 0.593 37(17) 0.591 11(12) 0.587 71(12) 0.587 62(8)
    b / nm 1.252 0(4) 1.247 8(3) 1.244 2(3) 1.245 17(17)
    c / nm 1.801 9(5) 1.795 0(4) 1.788 7(4) 1.789 5(3)
    α / (°) 93.274(5) 93.280(3) 93. 313(4) 93.355(2)
    β / (°) 98.093(5) 98.051(3) 98.104(4) 98.202(2)
    γ / (°) 92.964(5) 92.851(3) 92.894(4) 92.990(2)
    Volume / nm3 1.320 7(7) 1.306 5(5) 1.290 5(5) 1.291 3(3)
    Z 2 2 2 2
    Dc / (g·cm-3) 1.841 1.851 1.880 1.883
    Indices ranges -7 ≤ h ≤ 6, -14 ≤ k ≤ 14, -16 ≤ l ≤ 21 -6 ≤ h ≤ 7, -11 ≤ k ≤ 14, -21 ≤ l ≤ 20 -6 ≤ h ≤ 6, -14 ≤ k ≤ 14, -21 ≤ l ≤ 19 -6 ≤ h ≤ 6, -14 ≤ k ≤ 12, -21 ≤ l ≤ 20
    F(000) 722 712 714 716
    Reflection collected 6 768 6 723 6 599 6 837
    Unique reflection 4 610 4 562 4 503 4 504
    Rint 0.026 7 0.024 9 0.029 5 0.042 7
    GOF on F2 1.053 1.027 1.048 1.033
    R, wR [I > 2σ(I)] R1=0.034 6, wR2=0.073 1 R1=0.031 3, wR2=0.079 5 R1=0.035 5, wR2=0.076 6 R1=0.046 1, wR2=0.116 1
    R, wR (all data) R1=0.041 4, wR2=0.079 2 R1=0.037 0, wR2=0.093 2 R1=0.043 7, wR2=0.081 0 R1=0.050 7, wR2=0.121 5

    The structures of complexes 1, 2, 3, and 4 are the same, so structural analysis of the four complexes is performed by representing the central atoms of M. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis reveals that the complex crystallizes in the triclinic crystal system with the P1 space group. The asymmetric unit comprises one M3+ ion, one fully deprotonated ligand cpna2-, one partially deprotonated ligand Hcpna-, and three coordinated water molecules. Thus, a nine-coordinated structure is formed. As shown in Fig. 1a, M3+ is arranged in a distorted single-cap square inverse prism, O3, O4, O5, and O9A form the bottom of the tetragonal body, O3, O6, O7, and O10A form the top of the tetragonal body and O2 is the top of the single cap. The completely deprotonated cpna2- ligand adopts μ2η1, η1, η1, η1 coordination mode, and the partially deprotonated ligand Hcpna- ligand adopts μ1η1, η1 coordination mode (Scheme 1). M3+ ion is coordinated by two O atoms (O3 and O4) from cpna-, four O atoms (O1, O2, O9A, and O10A) from cpna2- and three O atoms (O5, O6, and O7) from water molecules. Each M3+ ion linked two adjacent M3+ ions through fully deprotonated cpna2- and formed infinite zigzag chains along the b-axis. (Fig. 1b)

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  (a) Coordination environment of M3+ (M=Dy, Ho, Er, Tm) in complexes 1-4; (b) 1D chain structure of complexes 1-4

    Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: A: x, 1+y, z.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Coordination modes of cpna2- (left) and Hcpna- (right) anions

    In the complexes, the O—M—O angles are in the ranges of 51.06(11)°-160.16(14)° (1), 51.45(12)°-159.80(14)° (2), 51.63(12)°-159.76(14)° (3), and 51.58(15)°-159.18(19)° (4). The M—O bond lengths change from 0.233 1(4) to 0.289 7(5) nm for 1, from 0.230 8(4) to 0.287 9(6) nm for 2, from 0.229 4(4) to 0.278 5(6) nm for 3, and from 0.230 1(4) to 0.285 8(7) nm for 4. The organic ligand exhibits two kinds of coordination modes: one carboxyl group on the benzene ring of the Hcpna- ligand is not coordinated and another COO- group on the pyridine ring adopts a bidentate mode. The Hcpna- ligand shows a dihedral angle (between pyridyl and benzene rings) of 53.20° (1), 52.69° (2), 52.92° (3), and 52.50° (4), and the C—Oether—C angle between two aromatic rings is 120.50° (1), 120.40° (2), 120.22° (3), and 121.34° (4). For the cpna2- ligand, two COO- groups adopt bidentate mode. The cpna2- ligand shows a dihedral angle (between pyridyl and benzene rings) of 66.89° (1), 66.84° (2), 67.26° (3), and 67.63° (4), and the C—Oether—C angle between two aromatic rings is 119.64° (1), 120.14° (2), 119.58° (3), and 120.03° (4). The distance between adjacent M3+ atoms is 1.252 nm (1), 1.248 nm (2), 1.244 nm (3), and 1.245 nm (4).

    PXRD analyses of complexes 1-4 were performed before the fluorescence and magnetic properties test. As shown in Fig. 2, the experimental data are in good agreement with the simulated pattern of single-crystal X-ray diffraction data, which proves that the phase purity of the test product is sufficient for the next step of the experiment.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Experimental and simulated PXRD patterns of complexes 1 (a), 2 (b), 3 (c), and 4 (d)

    To determine the thermal stability of the complexes, TGA experiments were carried out. As shown in Fig. 3, the results of the TGA indicate that complexes 1-4 have almost the same thermodynamic stability. The complexes had two steps of decomposition in a range of 22-900 ℃. The first major weight loss occurred at temperatures between 22 and 200 ℃ corresponding to the removal of the water molecules. There was nearly no weight loss at the temperatures between 200 and 320℃. The second weight loss occurred at temperatures between 320 and 900 ℃, corresponding to the decomposition of the complex skeleton. TGA indicates complexes 1-4 have good thermal stability.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  TGA curves of complexes 1-4

    The solid-state fluorescence spectra of H2cpna and complexes 1-4 were recorded at room temperature on a Varian Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrometer under an excitation of 280 nm. As shown in Fig. 4, the H2cpna ligand had a wide emission band between 350 and 415 nm, and the maximum emission peak was about 390 nm. The emission peak of the ligand is attributed to the charge transfer within the ligand, that is, the electron transition of n-π* or π-π*. The fluorescence test results show that complexes 1-4 had similar fluorescence emission bands with the H2cpna ligand. Therefore, it is considered that the fluorescence emission peak of the complexes comes from the ligand. The difference was that the fluorescence emission intensity of 1-4 were weaker than that of the ligand. After the formation of the complex, the lone pair electrons of the coordination atoms on the ligand form a coordination bond with the metal ions, which changes the electron distribution on the ligand. Coupled with the heavy atom effect of metal ions, the fluorescence intensity of the complex is reduced.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  Fluorescence spectra of H2cpna and complexes 1-4

    The magnetism of complexes 1-4 were studied on a Quantum Design SQUID-VSM magnetometer by solid-state magnetic susceptibility measurements in the 2-300 K range at 1 kOe dc field. Plots of the χmT versus T and magnetic analysis of complexes 1-4 are shown in Fig. 5.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  Plots of χmT vs T for complexes 1-4

    For complex 1, χmT was almost a constant from 14.04 cm3·mol-1·K at 300 K, corresponding to the expected values (14.18 cm3·mol-1·K) for one uncoupled Dy(Ⅲ)) ion[16-17]. As the temperature decreased, χmT gradually decreased; reaching 7.56 cm3·mol-1·K at 2 K. For complex 2, χmT was almost a constant from 14.15 cm3·mol-1·K at 300 K, which corresponds to the expected values (14.45 cm3·mol-1·K) for one uncoupled Ho(Ⅲ) ion[18-19]. When the temperature decreased, χmT gradually decreased and reached 2.54 cm3·mol-1·K at 2 K. For complex 3, χmT value was 11.08 cm3·mol-1·K at room temperature, which is consistent with the value (11.86 cm3·mol-1·K) of one independent Er(Ⅲ) ion[20-21]. χmT gradually decreased as the temperature decreased, and finally reached 5.78 cm3·mol-1·K at 2 K. For complex 4, χmT was almost a constant from 6.83 cm3·mol-1·K at 300 K, which is consistent with the value (7.15 cm3·mol-1·K) of one independent Tm(Ⅲ) ion[22-23]. χmT decreased with decreasing temperature; reaching 0.57 cm3·mol-1·K at 2 K. The above data analysis indicates that the magnetism of all the complexes exhibits weak antiferromagnetic behavior. From the structural diagrams of the four complexes, it can be seen that the ligands in the complexes are relatively large, resulting in a longer distance between rare earth ions, thus there is almost no magnetic interaction between adjacent rare earth ions. At the same time, rare earth ions are difficult to magnetically interact with neighboring ions due to f-electrons. So χmT of the four complexes decreasing with decreasing temperature is not related to the coupling effect. This trend of change is completely caused by the de-heating population of the Stark energy levels of rare earth ions[24].

    In summary, four 1D chain structure isomorphic rare earth complexes have been synthesized by the solvothermal method based on the polyacid ligand (H2cpna) and rare earth metal ions Dy3+, Ho3+, Er3+, and Tm3+. The fluorescence and magnetism of complexes 1-4 were studied at room temperature. The fluorescence test results show that the fluorescence intensities of complexes 1-4 were all lower than that of the ligand, and magnetic results indicate that the magnetism of all four complexes exhibits weak antiferromagnetic behavior.


    1. [1]

      Martins V, Xu J, Wang X L, Chen K Z, Hung I A, Gan Z H, Gervais C, Bonhomme C, Jiang S J, Zheng A M, Lucier B E G, Huang Y N. Higher magnetic fields, finer MOF structural information: 17O solid-state NMR at 35.2 T[J]. J. Am. Chem.Soc., 2020, 142:  14877-14889. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c02810

    2. [2]

      Baranets S, Bobev S. Caught in action. The late rare earths thulium and lutetium substituting aluminum atoms in the structure of Ca14AlBi11[J]. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143:  65-68. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c11026

    3. [3]

      Lin L, Li L H, Wu C, Huang Z P, Humphrey M G, Zhang C. Incorporating rare-earth cations with moderate electropositivity into iodates for the optimized second-order nonlinear optical performance[J]. Inorg. Chem. Front., 2020, 7:  2736-2746. doi: 10.1039/D0QI00162G

    4. [4]

      孙为银. 配位化学. 2版. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2010: 123-126SUN W Y. Coordination chemistry. 2nd ed. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2010: 123-126

    5. [5]

      黄佳祥, 赵河, 刘淑芹, 张建军. 基于双核{Zn2(COO)4}次级构筑单元的二维发光配位聚合物的晶体结构和对Fe3+的检测[J]. 无机化学学报, 2021,37,(8): 1513-1518. HUANG J X, ZHAO H, LIU S Q, ZHANG J J. Two-dimensional luminescent coordination polymer based on dinuclear {Zn2(COO)4} second buildings units: Crystal structure and detection of Fe3+[J]. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2021, 37(8):  1513-1518.

    6. [6]

      Thielemann D T, Wagner A T, Rösch E, Kölmel D K, Heck J G, Rudat B, Neumaier M, Feldmann C, Schepers U, Bräse S, Roesky P W. Luminescent cell-penetrating pentadecanuclear lanthanide clusters[J]. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135:  7454-7457. doi: 10.1021/ja403539t

    7. [7]

      Liu Y C, Lin P, Du S W. Two novel homochiral enantiomorphicanic 3D metal-organic frameworks: Synthesis, crystal structure, luminescent and SHG properties[J]. Chin. J. Struct. Chem., 2013, 10:  1509-1516.

    8. [8]

      李和川, 李明凤, 何成, 段春迎. 基于非贵金属镍的金属有机大环的光解水放氢性能[J]. 无机化学学报, 2018,34,(1): 11-19. Li H C, Li M F, He C, DUAN C Y. Construction of a noble-meta-free nickel metal-organic macrocycle for photocatalytic hydrogen production[J]. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2018, 34(1):  11-19.

    9. [9]

      Allendorf M D, Bauer C A, Bhakta R K. Luminescent metal-organic frameworks[J]. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38:  1330-1352. doi: 10.1039/b802352m

    10. [10]

      Liu S J, Han S D, Zhao J P, Xu J L, Bu X H. In-situ synthesis of molecular magnetorefrigerant materials[J]. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2019, 394:  39-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.05.009

    11. [11]

      Gao X S, Ding M J, Zhang J, Zhao L D, Ren X M. Phase selectivity and tunable photophysical nature of rare earth metal-organic frameworks of EuxY1-x-PTC (H3PTC=2, 4, 6-pyridine tricarboxylic acid; x= 0-1)[J]. Dalton Trans., 2020, 49:  14985-14994. doi: 10.1039/D0DT03150J

    12. [12]

      Gu J Z, Liang X X, Cai Y, Wu J, Shi Z F, Kirillov A M. Hydrothermal assembly, structures, topologies, luminescence, and magnetism of a novel series of coordination polymers driven by a trifunctional nicotinic acid building block[J]. Dalton Trans., 2017, 46:  10908-10925. doi: 10.1039/C7DT01742A

    13. [13]

      Shen Z, Zhao Q, Xie H Q, Feng Y Q, Chen S Y, Shi Z. Synthesis, optical and magnetic research of nicotinic acid ligand Zn, Cd, Mn and Co complexes[J]. J. Solid State Chem., 2021, 302:  122437-122443. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2021.122437

    14. [14]

      Sheldrick G M. SADABS, Area-detector absorption correction. Siemens Industrial Automation, Inc., Madison, WI, 2001.

    15. [15]

      Sheldrick G M. SHELXL-2018, Program for X-ray crystal structure solution. University of Göttingen, Germany, 2018.

    16. [16]

      Chen G J, Gao C Y, Tian J L, Tang J K, Gu W, Liu X. Coordination-perturbed single-molecule magnet behavior of mononuclear dysprosium complexes[J]. Dalton Trans., 2011, 40:  5579-5583. doi: 10.1039/c1dt10050e

    17. [17]

      Zhang Z Q, Wang P Y, Rong HW, Li L W. Structural and cryogenic magnetic properties of RE2Ni2In (RE=Pr, Nd, Dy and Ho) compounds[J]. Dalton Trans., 2019, 48:  17792-17799. doi: 10.1039/C9DT03245B

    18. [18]

      Rasamsetty A, Das C, Sañudo E C, Shanmugam M, Baskar V. Effect of coordination geometry on the magnetic properties of a series of Ln2 and Ln4 hydroxo clusters[J]. Dalton Trans., 2018, 47:  1726-1738. doi: 10.1039/C7DT00172J

    19. [19]

      Latendresse T P, Vieru V, Upadhyay A, Bhuvanesh N S, Chibotaru L F, Nippe M. Trends in trigonal prismatic Ln-[1] ferrocenophane complexes and discovery of a Ho3+ single-molecule magnet[J]. Chem. Sci, 2020, 11:  3936-3951. doi: 10.1039/D0SC01197E

    20. [20]

      Gavrikov AV, Koroteev P S, Efimov N N, Dobrokhotova Z V, Ilyukhin A B, Kostopoulos A K, Ariciub A M, Novotortsev V M. Novel mononuclear and 1D-polymeric derivatives of lanthanides and (η6-benzoic acid) tricarbonylchromium: Synthesis, structure and magnetism[J]. Dalton Trans., 2017, 46:  3369-3380. doi: 10.1039/C6DT04895A

    21. [21]

      Wang J, Miao H, Xiao Z X, Zhou Y, Deng L D, Zhang Y Q, Wang X Y. Syntheses, structures and magnetic properties of the lanthanide complexes of the pyrimidyl-substituted nitronyl nitroxide radical[J]. Dalton Trans., 2017, 46:  10452-10461. doi: 10.1039/C7DT01037K

    22. [22]

      Huizi-Rayo U, Zabala-Lekuona A, Terenzi A, Cruz C. M, Cuerva J M, Rodríguez-Diéguez A, García J A, Seco J M, Sebastian E S, Cepeda J. Influence of thermally induced structural transformations on the magnetic and luminescence properties of tartrate-based chiral lanthanide organic-frameworks[J]. J. Mater. Chem. C, 2020, 8:  8243-8256. doi: 10.1039/D0TC00736F

    23. [23]

      Anwar M U, Dawe L N, Tandon S S, Bungec S D, Thompson L K. Polynuclear lanthanide (Ln) complexes of a tri-functional hydrazone ligand mononuclear (Dy), dinuclear (Yb, Tm), tetranuclear (Gd), and hexanuclear (Gd, Dy, Tb) examples[J]. Dalton Trans., 2013, 42:  7781-7794. doi: 10.1039/c3dt32732a

    24. [24]

      Kahn O. Molecular magnetism. Weinheim, New York: VCH-Verlag, 1993: 43-51

  • Figure 1  (a) Coordination environment of M3+ (M=Dy, Ho, Er, Tm) in complexes 1-4; (b) 1D chain structure of complexes 1-4

    Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity; Symmetry code: A: x, 1+y, z.

    Scheme 1  Coordination modes of cpna2- (left) and Hcpna- (right) anions

    Figure 2  Experimental and simulated PXRD patterns of complexes 1 (a), 2 (b), 3 (c), and 4 (d)

    Figure 3  TGA curves of complexes 1-4

    Figure 4  Fluorescence spectra of H2cpna and complexes 1-4

    Figure 5  Plots of χmT vs T for complexes 1-4

    Table 1.  Crystallographic data for complexes 1-4

    Parameter 1 2 3 4
    Chemical formula DyC26H21N2O13 HoC26H21N2O13 ErC26H21N2O13 TmC26H21N2O13
    Formula weight 731.95 734.38 736.71 738.38
    Space group P1 P1 P1 P1
    a / nm 0.593 37(17) 0.591 11(12) 0.587 71(12) 0.587 62(8)
    b / nm 1.252 0(4) 1.247 8(3) 1.244 2(3) 1.245 17(17)
    c / nm 1.801 9(5) 1.795 0(4) 1.788 7(4) 1.789 5(3)
    α / (°) 93.274(5) 93.280(3) 93. 313(4) 93.355(2)
    β / (°) 98.093(5) 98.051(3) 98.104(4) 98.202(2)
    γ / (°) 92.964(5) 92.851(3) 92.894(4) 92.990(2)
    Volume / nm3 1.320 7(7) 1.306 5(5) 1.290 5(5) 1.291 3(3)
    Z 2 2 2 2
    Dc / (g·cm-3) 1.841 1.851 1.880 1.883
    Indices ranges -7 ≤ h ≤ 6, -14 ≤ k ≤ 14, -16 ≤ l ≤ 21 -6 ≤ h ≤ 7, -11 ≤ k ≤ 14, -21 ≤ l ≤ 20 -6 ≤ h ≤ 6, -14 ≤ k ≤ 14, -21 ≤ l ≤ 19 -6 ≤ h ≤ 6, -14 ≤ k ≤ 12, -21 ≤ l ≤ 20
    F(000) 722 712 714 716
    Reflection collected 6 768 6 723 6 599 6 837
    Unique reflection 4 610 4 562 4 503 4 504
    Rint 0.026 7 0.024 9 0.029 5 0.042 7
    GOF on F2 1.053 1.027 1.048 1.033
    R, wR [I > 2σ(I)] R1=0.034 6, wR2=0.073 1 R1=0.031 3, wR2=0.079 5 R1=0.035 5, wR2=0.076 6 R1=0.046 1, wR2=0.116 1
    R, wR (all data) R1=0.041 4, wR2=0.079 2 R1=0.037 0, wR2=0.093 2 R1=0.043 7, wR2=0.081 0 R1=0.050 7, wR2=0.121 5
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 文章访问数:  533
  • HTML全文浏览量:  64
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2023-11-10
  • 收稿日期:  2023-05-31
  • 修回日期:  2023-09-28
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章