Post-modification-induced supramolecular transformation of Hopf link to macrocycle

Pan-Pan Hua Hui-Jun Feng Shu-Ning Lan Francisco Aznarez Li-Fang Zhang

Citation:  Pan-Pan Hua, Hui-Jun Feng, Shu-Ning Lan, Francisco Aznarez, Li-Fang Zhang. Post-modification-induced supramolecular transformation of Hopf link to macrocycle[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025, 36(6): 110684. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110684 shu

Post-modification-induced supramolecular transformation of Hopf link to macrocycle

English

  • The synthesis of topologically complex knots, links, and entanglements has increasingly garnered attention in supramolecular chemistry over the past few decades [16]. Inspired by the profound relationship between topology and the functionality of molecular systems observed in nature, chemists have devoted significant efforts to harnessing topology to develop artificial molecular machines [712]. There has been a rapid rise in interest among scientists in mechanically interlocked structures composed of two or more interlocked rings, owing to their fascinating topological configurations and their potential applications as smart materials and nanoscale devices [1321].

    Among the various entities, [2]catenane, the simplest type of catenane with Hopf link topology, is particularly intriguing due to its unique topological features and properties [2225]. A synthetic strategy that relies on component pre-orientation has been shown to be an effective method for constructing molecular [2]catenanes [2628]. Sauvage and his colleagues pioneered the use of metal–ligand interactions through a metal-ion-templated approach to preorganize these components [29]. However, achieving the dynamic interconversion necessary for synthesizing [2]catenanes using metal-ion-templated assembly remains challenging. Self-assembly driven by various supramolecular interactions, including ππ interactions, hydrogen bonds, and other weak secondary interactions, can serve as a significant driving force for catenation [3035]. Compared to template methods, the self-assembly approach is more challenging to control due to the delicate nature of intermolecular interactions; however, it facilitates the realization of dynamic interconversion [3644].

    In addition to their intriguing structures and topological significance, [2]catenanes possess potential applications as smart materials, nanoscale devices, and molecular machines [4552]. The stimuli-induced supramolecular transformations of [2]catenanes are crucial for achieving these functionalities and responsiveness. Over the past few decades, a variety of stimuli, including solvents, concentration changes, and guest molecules, have been effectively utilized to trigger the transformation processes of [2]catenanes [5357]. Post-modification, which can be used to transform various initial self-assembled entities into new structures, has been rarely explored in the context of [2]catenane topologies.

    The Diels–Alder (IEDDA) reaction between electron-rich dienophiles and electron-deficient tetrazines is considered a promising post-modification strategy, as it can generate desired products under mild conditions with minimal production of unwanted byproducts [58,59]. This reaction has been effectively employed to induce the supramolecular transformation of discrete supramolecular coordination complexes. Herein, a strategically chosen ligand 3,6-bis(4-pyridyl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine (L) was synthesized and used as the bridge ligand. By utilizing ligand L as the linker and half-sandwich arene-Ru(Ⅱ) binuclear fragments B as the rigid capping unit, a novel template-free ruthenium(Ⅱ) metalla[2]catenane was realized. Moreover, taking advantage of the IEDDA reaction between these tetrazine moieties and electron-rich dienophiles, post-modification is shown to induce topological transformations from [2]catenanes to the corresponding component monomers.

    We began our investigation into the potential of using IEDDA reactions as an effective method for triggering the transformation processes of [2]catenanes by synthesizing a metalla[2]catenane that incorporates tetrazine moieties. Given that the formation of metalla[2]catenanes featuring two identical interlocked rectangles is favored by π-π stacking and other non-covalent interactions that act as driving forces, we hypothesized that a binuclear building block length of approximately 7 Å would be suitable for generating two interlocked rings. Consequently, the treatment of the binuclear building block B with an equimolar amount of L resulted in the formation of metalla[2]catenanes 1 in a concentrated methanolic solution. When the reaction concentration exceeded 48.0 mmol/L (with respect to the Cp*Rh fragment), only one diffusion coefficient was observed in the DOSY NMR spectrum (Fig. S4 in Supporting information), indicating that the new self-assembled product was produced quantitatively.

    The structure of the interlocked metalla[2]catenane 1 was unequivocally confirmed through single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Single crystals of 1, suitable for X-ray diffraction, were obtained with a yield of 91% by the diffusion of diethyl ether into a methanol solution of 1 over several days. The interlocked structural nature of 1 was verified upon structural refinement, which clearly illustrated the interlocked metalla[2]catenane (Fig. 1). The two metallarectangles in the refined X-ray crystal structure of 1 are mutually interpenetrated in a quadruple fashion. Strong π-π stacking interactions, observed in the range of 3.5–4.0 Å, occurred between the π-electron-rich thiophene moieties of L1 from the two different macrocycles. Additionally, edge-to-face T-shaped C–H···π interactions were noted between one of the corner phenyl rings of the anthracene moiety and a corner phenyl ring of the naphthacenedione moiety, further stabilizing the interlocked structure. Thus, the π-π stacking and other weak interactions likely serve as the driving forces that lead to the preorientation of ligands L, facilitating the formation of the metalla[2]catenane. The ESI-MS spectrum of the interlocked 1 confirmed the [M4L4]4+ composition, with a prominent signal at m/z 1575.453 ([M-3OTf]3+; Fig. 2a). The experimentally observed and theoretically calculated isotopic distributions showed excellent agreement. After determination of the solid-state molecular structure of 1, relevant NMR spectroscopic experiments were carried out to further explore its behavior in solution (Fig. 3a). All 1H NMR signal assignments were corroborated by 1H–1H COSY (Figs. S6 and S7 in Supporting information).

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Single-crystal X-ray structure of metalla[2]catenane 1. Most hydrogen atoms, anions, solvent molecules, and disordered molecules are omitted for clarity (N, blue; O, red; C, gray; and Rh, green).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Experimental (top, blue) and theoretical (bottom, pink) ESI-MS spectra of (a) [1—3OTf-]3+, (b) [2—2OTf-]2+ and (c) [3—3OTf-]3+.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD, ppm) for (a) 1 and (b) 3.

    Recent investigations have demonstrated that coordination-driven self-assembled architectures provide an ideal platform for studying supramolecular transformations, primarily due to the inherently dynamic behavior of metal-ligand bonds and the weak interactions between subunits. In this study, we observed solvent-induced supramolecular transformations between metalla[2]catenane 1 and the corresponding monorectangle 2. Upon dissolving crystals of metalla[2]catenane 1 in acetonitrile, the 1H NMR spectral patterns of the solution changed. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) supported the assignment of the monorectangle structure of 2 in acetonitrile solution, with a prominent signal at m/z = 1144.612 ([2-2OTf]2+), aligning well with the expected theoretical distribution (Fig. 2b).

    To further investigate the interconversion between 1 and 2 induced by the solvent, a 1H NMR titration experiment was conducted. Gradual addition of CD3CN to a solution of complex 1 in CD3OD facilitated the rapid conversion of complex 1 into 2, as demonstrated by 1H NMR spectroscopy. These results indicate that the dynamic interconversion between metalla[2]catenane 1 and metallacycle 2 can be triggered by changes in solvent (Scheme 1). The 1H NMR titration experiment revealed no transformation between the [2]catenane and the metallacycles solely through changes in concentration, suggesting that 1 remains stable in methanol solution.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Self-assembly of metalla[2]catenane and monorectangles and the topological transformation of metalla[2]catenane to monorectangles.

    The X-ray diffraction analysis unambiguously confirmed the formation of the monorectangle 2 (Fig. 4). Single-crystal X-ray crystallographic analysis revealed that the molecular structure of 2 is a single ring. Two di-Ru molecular clips are linked by two pyridyl ligands, thus forming a rectangle-like tetranuclear complex with the dimensions of 15.20 × 8.40 Å. Recorded NMR spectroscopic data and elemental analysis confirmed the formation of 2. The 1H NMR spectrum of complex 2 exhibited two multiplets at δ 2.96 and 1.32, as well as a singlet at δ 2.19, which can be attributed to the protons of the Cp group. Moreover, the aromatic protons of L appeared at δ 8.72 and 8.25 ppm, while the protons of B resonated as two sets of multiplets at δ 8.76 and 7.97 ppm. The 1H DOSY NMR spectra of 2 revealed a single diffusion coefficient for all aromatic and Cp proton signals, indicating that all resonances originate from a single assembly (Fig. S6).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  Single-crystal X-ray structure of monorectangle 2. Most hydrogen atoms, anions, solvent molecules, and disordered molecules are omitted for clarity (N, blue; O, red; C, gray; and Rh, green).

    The investigation was subsequently extended to explore the supramolecular transformation of metalla[2]catenanes induced by IEDDA reactions. Upon treating metalla[2]catenane 1 with NBD in methanol-d4 at a concentration of 10 mmol/L, the 1H NMR spectral patterns of the solution changed, revealing new proton resonances (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, the ESI-MS spectrum confirmed the metallacycle composition of the new product 3, with a prominent signal at m/z 712.097 ([M-3OTf]3+; Fig. 2c). The experimentally observed isotopic distribution agreed excellently with the theoretically calculated values.

    To further investigate the interconversion between 1 and 3 induced by IEDDA reactions, a 1H NMR monitoring experiment was conducted (Fig. 5). After the addition of ten equimolar amounts of NBD to a solution of 1 in methanol-d4, the NMR data clearly demonstrated the gradual transformation of metalla[2]catenane 1 into the monorectangle 3. As the reaction time increased, the signals corresponding to pyridine (Ha, Hb) and anthracene (Hc, Hd) shifted from 8.81, 8.01, 8.86, and 8.38 ppm to 8.71, 8.02, 8.76, and 7.98 ppm, respectively. Meanwhile, new proton resonances emerged, such as δ = 8.02 ppm, which corresponded to pyridazine. The 1H NMR spectra indicated that metalla[2]catenane 1 was completely transformed into monorectangle 3 after 2.5 h at 298 K. Additionally, upon adding NBD to a solution of rectangle 2 in CD3CN, the NMR data showed a gradual transformation of rectangle 2 into monorectangle 3 over time (Fig. S10 in Supporting information).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  In situ 1H NMR monitoring of the reaction between metalla[2]catenane 1 and NBD (10 equiv. per tetrazine).

    We successfully obtained single crystals of compound 3 suitable for X-ray diffraction analyses by the slow diffusion of diethyl ether into a methanol solution of 3. Single-crystal X-ray crystallographic analysis confirmed that 3 is a discrete tetranuclear metallarectangle with dimensions of 15.22 × 8.40 Å (Fig. 6). Compared to the pyridazine bridge ligand in 3, the tetrazine ligand exhibits greater electron-donating behavior due to its higher electron density, resulting in stronger D-A stacking interactions between the tetrazine units and pyridine groups. This transformation is likely attributable to the comparatively weaker π-π stacking interactions of the pyridazine bridge ligand relative to those of the tetrazine ligand.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  Single-crystal X-ray structure of monorectangle 2. Most hydrogen atoms, anions, solvent molecules, and disordered molecules are omitted for clarity (N, blue; O, red; C, gray; and Rh, green).

    In conclusion, we successfully synthesized a novel metalla[2]catenane containing potentially reactive tetrazine sites by selecting the tetrazine-containing bridge ligand L as the linker and the half-sandwich ruthenium(Ⅱ) dinuclear fragment B as a rigid capping unit. This metalla[2]catenane is stable in methanol solution, and no transformations occur between the [2]catenane and the metallacycles. However, dissolving crystals of metalla[2]catenane 1 in acetonitrile leads to its conversion into metallacycles. We observed solvent-induced linking and unlinking reactions of the metalla[2]catenane, with the dynamic interconversion between metalla[2]catenane 1 and metallacycle 2 being exclusively triggered by changes in solvent. Furthermore, the metalla[2]catenane was shown to undergo supramolecular structural transformations induced by rapid and efficient post-modification reactions, yielding the corresponding monorectangle. This demonstrated IEDDA reaction provides a valuable method for controlling intricate and adjustable topological transformations, offering new insights into the field of supramolecular transformation.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Pan-Pan Hua: Writing – original draft, Data curation. Hui-Jun Feng: Writing – review & editing. Shu-Ning Lan: Investigation, Data curation. Francisco Aznarez: Supervision, Software. Li-Fang Zhang: Writing – review & editing.

    We are indebted to the Shanxi Province Science Foundation for Youth (No. 202203021212408), the Shanxi Normal University Quality Curriculum (No. 2019YZKC-13), and the 1331 Project of Shanxi Province.

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110684.


    1. [1]

      C. Shi, H. Li, W. Xie, Org. Lett. 26 (2024) 6910–6914. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.4c02572

    2. [2]

      Y.S. Wang, S. Bai, Y.Y. Wang, et al., Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 13689–13692. doi: 10.1039/c9cc07113j

    3. [3]

      Q.F. Sun, S. Sato, M. Fujita, Angew. Chem. 126 (2014) 13728–13731. doi: 10.1002/ange.201408652

    4. [4]

      S.J. Chen, D.K. Su, C.C. Jia, et al., Chem 8 (2022) 243–252. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.11.012

    5. [5]

      Yu. Mao, J. Ma, J. Ji, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 109927. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109927

    6. [6]

      Q. Chai, L. Duan, Y. Ma, Sci. China Chem. 67 (2024) 1510–1523. doi: 10.1007/s11426-023-1919-2

    7. [7]

      H.H. Duan, F. Cao, H.X. Hao, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 (2021) 16837–16845. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c01867

    8. [8]

      Y. Liu, Z. Guo, Y. Guo, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108531. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108531

    9. [9]

      F. Cui, Q. Zhang, T. Xiao, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 110061. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110061

    10. [10]

      T. Feng, X. Li, Y.Y. An, et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 13516–13520. doi: 10.1002/anie.202004112

    11. [11]

      Y.S. Wang, H. Li, S. Bai, Sci. China Chem. 66 (2023) 778–782.

    12. [12]

      R. Huang, X. Wei, P. Wang, et al., Org. Lett. 26 (2024) 1405–1409. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c04367

    13. [13]

      S.N. Lei, H. Cong, Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 1493–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.068

    14. [14]

      Y. Liu, S.H. Liao, W.T. Dai, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202217215. doi: 10.1002/anie.202217215

    15. [15]

      P.P. Hua, H.J. Feng, X. Gao, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front. 11 (2024) 5026–5033. doi: 10.1039/d4qi01288g

    16. [16]

      T. Chen, Y. Zhao, L.L. Dang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145 (2023) 18036–18047. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c05720

    17. [17]

      W.B. Yu, F.Y. Qiu, S.T. Luo, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front. 8 (2021) 2356–2364. doi: 10.1039/d1qi00174d

    18. [18]

      Q.S. Mu, X. Gao, Z. Cui, et al., Sci. China Chem. 66 (2023) 2885–2891. doi: 10.1007/s11426-023-1675-0

    19. [19]

      M.M. Gan, J.Q. Liu, L. Zhang, et al., Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 9587–9641. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00119

    20. [20]

      Y. Zhou, H.-N. Zhang, Q.S. Mu, et al., Chin. J. Chem. 41 (2023) 3229–3237. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202300359

    21. [21]

      Y.R. Shen, X. Gao, Z. Cui, et al., Chin. J. Chem. 39 (2021) 3303–3308. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202100546

    22. [22]

      W.L. Shan, Y.J. Lin, F.E. Hahn, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 5882–5886. doi: 10.1002/anie.201900556

    23. [23]

      Y. Li, G.F. Jin, Y.Y. An, et al., Chin. J. Chem. 37 (2019) 1147–1152. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201900348

    24. [24]

      Y.H. Song, N. Singh, J. Jung, Angew. Chem. 128 (2016) 2047–2051. doi: 10.1002/ange.201508257

    25. [25]

      Y.Y. Zhang, F.Y. Qiu, H.T. Shi, et al., Chem. Commun. 57 (2021) 3010–3013. doi: 10.1039/d0cc08052g

    26. [26]

      M. Koizumi, C. Dietrich-Buchecker, J.P. Sauvage, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004 (2004) 770–775. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.200300572

    27. [27]

      Y.W. Zhang, Y. Lu, L.Y. Sun, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202312323. doi: 10.1002/anie.202312323

    28. [28]

      C.C. Yee, A.W.H. Ng, H.Y. Au-Yeung, Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 6169–6172. doi: 10.1039/c9cc02263e

    29. [29]

      H. Lee, P. Elumalai, N. Singh, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 4674–4677. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b02573

    30. [30]

      P.P. Hua, J.H. Bai, H.J. Feng, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 26427–26434. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c09385

    31. [31]

      Y. Zou, S.J. Bao, H. Tang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63 (2024) e202410722. doi: 10.1002/anie.202410722

    32. [32]

      L.L. Dang, Z.B. Sun, W.L. Shan, et al., Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 2057. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10075-6

    33. [33]

      S.C. Li, L.X. Cai, L.P. Zhou, et al., Sci. China Chem. 62 (2019) 713–718. doi: 10.1007/s11426-018-9427-4

    34. [34]

      B.H. Northrop, Y.R. Zheng, K.W. Chi, Acc. Chem. Res. 42 (2009) 1554–1563. doi: 10.1021/ar900077c

    35. [35]

      Y. Lu, H.N. Zhang, G.X. Jin, Acc. Chem. Res. 51 (2018) 2148–2158. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00220

    36. [36]

      X.Z. Li, L.P. Zhou, L.L. Yang, et al., Nat. Commun. 9 (2018) 547. doi: 10.2174/1871527317666180711093538

    37. [37]

      S. Wang, Z. Huang, A. Li, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 9573–9579. doi: 10.1002/anie.202100441

    38. [38]

      Z. Jiang, H. Zhao, J. Wang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108334. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108334

    39. [39]

      H. Duan, T. Yang, Q. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 108878. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108878

    40. [40]

      F. Zeng, L.L. Tang, H. Yu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108304. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108304

    41. [41]

      L. Cheng, P. Tian, Q. Li, et al., CCS Chem. 3 (2021) 3608–3614.

    42. [42]

      H. Duan, F. Cao, M. Zhang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 2459–2463. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.11.010

    43. [43]

      D. Chen, T. Xiao, É. Monflier, et al., Commun. Chem. 7 (2024) 88. doi: 10.1038/s42004-024-01175-6

    44. [44]

      J. Jiao, H. Li, W. Xie, et al., Chem. Sci. 14 (2023) 11402–11409. doi: 10.1039/d3sc02995f

    45. [45]

      X. Gao, Z. Cui, Y.R. Shen, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 17833–17842. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c09333

    46. [46]

      S.J. Hu, X.Q. Guo, L.P. Zhou, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 4244–4253. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c00760

    47. [47]

      L.X. Cai, D.N. Yan, P.M. Cheng, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 2016–2024. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c12064

    48. [48]

      Y.W. Zhang, S. Bai, Y.Y. Wang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 13614–13621. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c06470

    49. [49]

      L.L. Dang, T.T. Zhang, T. Chen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202301516. doi: 10.1002/anie.202301516

    50. [50]

      J.H. Jo, N. Singh, D. Lim, et al., Inorg. Chem. 56 (2017) 8430–8438. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01101

    51. [51]

      T. Feng, X. Li, Y.Y. An, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 13516–13520. doi: 10.1002/anie.202004112

    52. [52]

      L.L. Dang, T.T. Zhang, T. Chen, et al., Org. Chem. Front. 9 (2022) 5505–5515. doi: 10.1039/d2qo01107g

    53. [53]

      Y. Takezawa, S. Yoneda, J.L. Duprey, et al., Chem. Sci. 7 (2016) 3006–3010. doi: 10.1039/C6SC00383D

    54. [54]

      S. Chen, L.J. Chen, H.B. Yang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 13596–13599. doi: 10.1021/ja306748k

    55. [55]

      Y. Sun, C. Chen, J. Liu, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 49 (2020) 3889–3919. doi: 10.1039/d0cs00038h

    56. [56]

      H.N. Zhang, W.B. Yu, Y.J. Lin, et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 15466–15471. doi: 10.1002/anie.202103264

    57. [57]

      H. Tang, H.N. Zhang, X. Gao, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 16020–16027. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c03019

    58. [58]

      F.G. Zhang, Z. Chen, X. Tang, et al., Chem. Rev. 121 (2021) 14555–14593. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00611

    59. [59]

      G.X. Xu, X. Bai, Q. Dang, et al., Acc. Chem. Res. 53 (2020) 773–781. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00604

  • Figure 1  Single-crystal X-ray structure of metalla[2]catenane 1. Most hydrogen atoms, anions, solvent molecules, and disordered molecules are omitted for clarity (N, blue; O, red; C, gray; and Rh, green).

    Figure 2  Experimental (top, blue) and theoretical (bottom, pink) ESI-MS spectra of (a) [1—3OTf-]3+, (b) [2—2OTf-]2+ and (c) [3—3OTf-]3+.

    Figure 3  1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD, ppm) for (a) 1 and (b) 3.

    Scheme 1  Self-assembly of metalla[2]catenane and monorectangles and the topological transformation of metalla[2]catenane to monorectangles.

    Figure 4  Single-crystal X-ray structure of monorectangle 2. Most hydrogen atoms, anions, solvent molecules, and disordered molecules are omitted for clarity (N, blue; O, red; C, gray; and Rh, green).

    Figure 5  In situ 1H NMR monitoring of the reaction between metalla[2]catenane 1 and NBD (10 equiv. per tetrazine).

    Figure 6  Single-crystal X-ray structure of monorectangle 2. Most hydrogen atoms, anions, solvent molecules, and disordered molecules are omitted for clarity (N, blue; O, red; C, gray; and Rh, green).

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 文章访问数:  170
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2025-06-15
  • 收稿日期:  2024-10-14
  • 接受日期:  2024-11-26
  • 修回日期:  2024-11-15
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-11-27
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章