Synthesis, structure, and host-guest chemistry of a pair of isomeric selenanthrene-bridged molecular cages

Wanqian Lv Yunyi Song Xinyuan Lv Jun Yuan Kelong Zhu

Citation:  Wanqian Lv, Yunyi Song, Xinyuan Lv, Jun Yuan, Kelong Zhu. Synthesis, structure, and host-guest chemistry of a pair of isomeric selenanthrene-bridged molecular cages[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2023, 34(11): 108179. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108179 shu

Synthesis, structure, and host-guest chemistry of a pair of isomeric selenanthrene-bridged molecular cages

English

  • Double stranded belt- or strip-shaped macrocycles are attractive to many chemists not only for their intriguing structures, but also potential applications in supramolecular chemistry and material science [112]. Owing to their intrinsic deep cavities, the tubular belt-shaped cages have been widely served as molecular containers which could enable absorption and separation [13], controlled release [14,15], and catalysis [16,17]. With the assistance of a conjugate carbon nanobelt, precise construction of nanotubes could also be achieved [18,19]. More interestingly, the double linkages could also produce twists in the cyclic backbones and allow access to molecular Möbius strips which are isomeric to their tubular counterparts [2023]. The unique topological structure of a molecular Möbius strip could be further useful in fabricating molecular knots [24,25]. Despite recent progresses in the field of molecular belt and cage chemistry, it remains essential and challenging to develop facile synthetic methods for double stranded belt-shaped cages with diverse structures and properties.

    Recently, we have reported a series of heteroatom (S or O) embedded molecular belts by taking advantage of utilizing conformationally dynamic hetero-anthracenes as building blocks [2630]. Noteworthily, the lateral fusion of thianthrene (TA) with dibenzo[24]crown-8 ether (DB24C8) has successfully afforded a pair of isomeric molecular cages featuring a tubular or a Möbius strip-shaped geometry [30]. To further explore the scope of this chemistry, we have now taken diselenin into account as the joint for constructing cage products (Fig. 1). Comparing with TA, selenanthrene (SeA) is generally less explored especially in both synthetic and host-guest chemistry. With the smaller bending angle (ϕ ~ 125°) and a larger barrier of ring inversion [31,32], fine tuning the molecular geometry and skeleton dynamics would become possible when SeA is employed as the building block. Moreover, the less electronegativity of selenium than sulfur may further induce enhanced binding affinity of a cage towards electron-deficient guest molecules. Although a few of selenium-containing macrocycles have been previously reported [3335], selenanthrene-bridged molecular cages are still rare and their properties remain largely under explored. Herein, we report the synthesis, structure determination, and host-guest complexation of two unprecedented belt-like molecular cages composed of SeA and DB24C8 moieties.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Schematic representation of a pair of selenanthrene-bridged molecular cages composed of SeA and DB24C8.

    To build the SeA-bridged cages, we have adopted a facile one-pot cyclization reaction developed previously for constructing the thianthrene counterparts [30]. Accordingly, optimization of the synthetic conditions has been conducted (Table S1 in Supporting information). As depicted in Fig. 2a, directly reacting the readily available tetrakisiodo-DB24C8 (2) with selenium powder in the presence of catalytic amount of cuprous iodide successfully afforded two products 1a and 1b with isolated yield of 6% and 2%, respectively. Both products were then subjected to high-resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS) analysis (Figs. S1 and S2 in Supporting information). The observed isotopic distribution of the predominant signal peak at m/z of 1229.0156, corresponding to [1a·Na]+, is in good consistence with simulation confirmed its correct molecular formula as desired (Fig. 3a). The HR-MS analysis of 1b revealed an identical pattern as that of 1a indicating a possible isomeric product (Fig. S2). However, both 1a and 1b have inferred symmetrical structures based on their proton NMR spectra (Fig. 3b). Only a singlet resonance peak for aromatic protons, at 7.10 and 7.17 ppm for 1a and 1b respectively, was observed. The resonance peaks for protons of ethylene glycol ether are similar but distinguishable. Therefore, 1a and 1b are most likely either a tubular or a Möbius belt-shaped cage with rapid skeleton dynamics at ambient temperature as that of thianthrene-bridged cages.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (a) Synthesis of selenanthrene-bridged cage 1a and 1b. Condition i: CuI, phenanthroline, K2CO3, dimethylacetamide, 150 ℃, 72 h. (b) Guest molecules employed in this study.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  (a) Experimental (red) and simulated (blue) isotopic distribution for [1a·Na]+ on mass spectroscopy; (b) Partial 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) spectra of 1a (top) and 1b (bottom). *CHCl3.

    The molecular structure of 1a and 1b were then unambiguously determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) measurement (Tables S2 and S3 in Supporting information). 1a exhibits a centrosymmetric molecular structure with a well-defined belt shape (Figs. 4a and b). Each crown ether moiety adopts a C-shaped conformation and clamps on a molecule of dichloromethane with assistance of C‒H⋯O hydrogen bondings. The macrocyclic cavity is further filled up by two molecules of acetonitrile forming C‒H⋯Cl hydrogen bondings between dichloromethanes. Such an inflated complex structure renders a bending angle of 128° for the SeA unit which is slightly larger than that of a free SeA [25,26]. The opening cavity gives a separation of ca. 9.5 Å between the two parallel benzene rings indicating sufficient room spaces potential for accommodating flat guest molecules via π-π stacking interactions. The overall geometry of 1a are quite similar to that of a thianthrene cage [30]. Interestingly, 1a stacks along the c crystal coordinate axis to yield one-dimensional channels which can further pack and expand into a three-dimensional porous structure (Fig. 4c). Intermolecular Se⋯Se interactions (dSe⋯Se = 4.02 Å) are observed between two adjacent belts and likely contributing to the aggregates. Therefore, the belt-shaped structure of 1a clearly implies its useful application in host-guest complexation study vide infra.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  Crystal structures of 1a. Hydrogen bonds are highlighted in gray dash lines. Color code: Se = Orange, O = red, N = deep blue, C = light blue and gray, Cl = green, H = white.

    SCXRD analysis revealed that 1b is a Möbius strip-shaped cage which is isomeric to 1a as proposed by NMR and MS analysis (see Supporting information for details). As displayed in Fig. 5, one of the two DB24C8 moieties of 1b twists and then connects to other non-twisted one, affords a twisted backbone for the strip (Fig. 5a). The puckering angle for both SeA moieties are determined to be 124° which is slightly smaller than those of 1a indicates a greatly squeezed cavity of 1b (Fig. 5b). Indeed, this can be further confirmed by observation of no solvent filling up its cavity while an acetonitrile and a water occupied that of the thianthrene-bridged cage [30]. Such reduced room space could hamper using 1b as a supramolecular host. Möbius strips are chiral and can be presented as P or M enantiomers [2023]. Accordingly, a pair of racemic cages are observed in each unit cell of the crystal from the unresolved mixture (Fig. 5c). Further packing of pairs of enantiomers along a and b axis results in the centrosymmetric structure with a non-polar space group of P1 (Fig. 5d). Attempts to chiral resolution of 1b via HPLC with chiral stationary phase have not meet success yet. Nonetheless, 1b is the first example of a molecular Möbius strip-shaped cage with selenium incorporated to date.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  Crystal structures of 1b. Hydrogen bonds are highlighted in gray dash lines. Color code: S = Orange, O = red, N = deep blue, C = light blue and gray, Cl = green, H = white.

    Möbius strips are known for twist migration dynamics [26,30], i.e. structural interconversion between the twisted and non-twisted halves of their backbones (Fig. 6a). As exemplified by an analogous thianthrene strip, the dynamic motion can be fast and associated with an energy barrier of 7.5 kcal/mol at 298 K [30]. To probe how the selenanthrene joint can influence on the migration behavior, 1b was then subjected to variable-temperature (VT) 1H NMR measurement (Fig. 6 and Fig. S3 in Supporting information). Upon cooling, the singlet resonance peak at 7.17 ppm for protons of SeA moieties gradually broadens and eventually splits into two sets of signals owing to the non-symmetrical structure of its limited conformation (Fig. 6b). The unidentical conformations of the two lateral crown ethers de-symmetrizes each SeA unit into two different benzo moieties (circle and triangle labels in Fig. 6a). The bent structure of SeA further distinguishes the two para-positioned protons (red and blue labels in Fig. 6a). Comparing with the coalescence temperature (Tc) of a TA-bridged strip (206 K), the higher Tc of 223 K for 1b indicates an increased barrier for migration to occur in the SeA-bridged strip. To prove this, the VT 1H NMR spectra were further simulated with different exchange rates to obtain an Eyring plot (Fig. 6c). By fitting the plot with a first-order kinetics, an activation energy barrier of 8.6 kcal/mol at 298 K was extrapolated for the twist migration to occur in 1b. The larger barrier for 1b to transit could be attributed to its bulker size due to selenium atoms. Thus, the incorporation of selenanthrene into a Möbius strip can slow down the twist migration.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  (a) Schematic representation of twist migration in 1b. (b) VT 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2) spectra (red trace) and simulation (black trace) with exchanging rates. (c) Eyring plot obtained from (b).

    As aforementioned, the intrinsic cavity of both 1a and 1b implies their potential applications as supramolecular hosts. Moreover, owing to the electron-rich nature of SeA, donor-acceptor complexes have been previously reported between a tetramethoxy SeA and electron-deficient guests [36]. Accordingly, host-guest complexation studies of both cages toward a series of cyano compounds (Fig. 2b), 1,2,4,5-tetracyanobenzene (TCNB), 7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ), and 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQF), were subsequently evaluated by 1H NMR and SCXRD analyses (see Supporting information for details). The proton NMR spectrum of an equimolar solution of 1a and TCNB in deuterated chloroform displayed a upfield chemical shift change from 8.24 ppm to 8.14 ppm for protons of TCNB, suggested possible π-π stacking interactions between the belt and TCNB (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). Non-linear curve fitting the NMR titration data afforded a binding constant (Ka) of 31 L/mol for the complex of 1a·TCNB (Fig. S5 in Supporting information).

    Suitable single crystals of 1a·TCNB were successfully obtained and analyzed by SCXRD (Table S4 in Supporting information). As shown in Fig. 7a, a molecule of TCNB is included in the cavity of 1a with π-π stacking to both SeA moieties, forming a taco-like complex. To bind the flat guest tightly, 1a has adaptively adjusted its conformation by folding both SeA units to a smaller angle (121°) and reducing the face-to-face distance of the two parallel benzoids (6.6 Å). Such an adaptive structural transformation has also resulted in a [2]pseudorotaxane structure for 1a·TCNB (Fig. 7b). The cage 1a stacks along the c crystal coordinate axis to yield one-dimensional channels which can further pack and expand into a three-dimensional (3D) porous structure (Fig. 7c). TCNB resides in the channels and forms ordered 3D arrays with separations of 16.8 and 12.4 Å along a and b axis, respectively. Smaller channels are also resulted by the packing of four adjacent cages and filled up with acetic acids.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7.  Crystal structures of inclusion complex 1a·TCNB. Hydrogen bonds and ππ interactions are highlighted in dash lines. Color code: Se = orange, O = red, C = light blue and green, N = deep blue, F = purple, H = white.

    A very similar binding behavior with a weaker binding affinity (Ka = 10 L/mol) has been observed for 1a to interact with TCNQ in solution as determined by 1H NMR study (Figs. S6 and S7 in Supporting information). SCXRD analysis (Table S5 in Supporting information) revealed an analogous [2]pseudorotaxane structure for the complex of 1a·TCNQ (Figs. 8a-c). To fit the flat TCNQ in the cavity, 1a has adaptively adjusted its conformation by folding both SeA units to an even smaller angle of 119°. A slightly larger face-to-face separation (6.9 Å) of the two parallel benzoids are observed for the distorted cage. π-π Stackings (d = 3.29 Å) along b axis are determined for the adjacent cages. Interestingly, TCNQs in close proximity can interact with each other via dipole-dipole interactions (Fig. 8c). A 2D layered polyrotaxane grid is finally formed when further expand the packing structure. However, comparing with the other two guests, negligible evidence for complexation has been observed when the more electron-deficient but bulkier TCNQF was employed in NMR investigation. This result was further supported by the solid-state structure of a co-crystallized sample from an equimolar solution of 1a and TCNQF (Fig. 8d) (Table S6 in Supporting information). The rhombus cavity of 1a is now deformed and squeezed to a parallelepiped. Instead of forming a discrete 1:1 inclusion complex, each TCNQF π-stacks with two parallelepipeds to afford a supramolecular polymer. Conversely, no detectable evidences for host-guest complexation of Möbius strip-shaped 1b with these guests have be observed.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8.  Crystal structures of complexes of 1a·TCNQ (a-c) and 1a·TCNQF (d). Hydrogen bonds and ππ interactions are highlighted in dash lines. Color code: Se = orange, O = red, C = light blue and green, N = deep blue, F = purple, H = white.

    To conclude, we have prepared a pair of selenanthrene-bridged molecular cages by a facile one-step cyclization reaction. The tube-shaped cage has an intrinsic cavity which can adaptively bind a series of electron-deficient guests as evidenced by NMR and single crystallography. The other product was confirmed to be a Möbius strip-shaped cage which exhibits slower twist-migration dynamics than that of a thianthrene counterpart, proving the success of structure and property regulation by incorporating selenanthrenes into molecular cages.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    We are grateful to National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21971268, 22171295), the Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams (No. 2017ZT07C069), Pearl River Talent Program (No. 2017GC010623), and the Starry Night Science Fund of Zhejiang University Shanghai Institute for Advanced Study (No. SN-ZJU-SIAS-006) for financial support.

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108179.


    1. [1]

      Q.H. Guo, Y. Qiu, M.X. Wang, et al., Nat. Chem. 13 (2021) 402–419. doi: 10.1038/s41557-021-00671-9

    2. [2]

      S. Lei, H. Cong, Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 1493–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.068

    3. [3]

      H. Feng, Y. Chen, R. Wang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108038. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108038

    4. [4]

      D. Eisenberg, R. Shenhar, M. Rabinovitz, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39 (2010) 2879–2890. doi: 10.1039/b904087k

    5. [5]

      L. Zhu, W. Zeng, M. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 229–233. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.06.003

    6. [6]

      G. Huang, W. Liu, A. Valkonen, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 29 (2018) 91–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.07.005

    7. [7]

      Y. Han, Z. Meng, Y.X. Ma, et al., Acc. Chem. Res. 47 (2014) 2026–2040. doi: 10.1021/ar5000677

    8. [8]

      T. Feng, X. Li, J. Wu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2022) 95–98. doi: 10.1117/12.2660054

    9. [9]

      J. Pan, W. Lin, F. Bao, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107519. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.05.033

    10. [10]

      T.H. Shi, M.X. Wang, CCS Chem. 3 (2020) 916–931.

    11. [11]

      Y. He, X. Yang, M. Qi, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 2043–2046. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.009

    12. [12]

      Y. Xiong, C. Huang, H. Liu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 3522–3525. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.04.060

    13. [13]

      H. Kim, Y. Kim, M. Yoon, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (2010) 12200–12202. doi: 10.1021/ja105211w

    14. [14]

      D.W. Zhang, W.K. Wang, Z.T. Li, Chem. Rec. 15 (2015) 233–251. doi: 10.1002/tcr.201402046

    15. [15]

      M.A. Majewski, Y. Hong, T. Lis, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 14072–14076. doi: 10.1002/anie.201608384

    16. [16]

      R. Ning, H. Zhou, S.X. Nie, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 10894–10898. doi: 10.1002/anie.202003673

    17. [17]

      D. Kauerhof, J. Niemeyer, ChemPlusChem 85 (2020) 889–899. doi: 10.1002/cplu.202000152

    18. [18]

      F.E. Golling, M. Quernheim, M. Wagner, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 (2014) 1525–1528. doi: 10.1002/anie.201309104

    19. [19]

      S. Hitosugi, T. Yamasaki, H. Isobe, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 12442–12445. doi: 10.1021/ja305723j

    20. [20]

      R. Herges, Chem. Rev. 106 (2006) 4820–4842. doi: 10.1021/cr0505425

    21. [21]

      S. Nishigaki, Y. Shibata, A. Nakajima, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 14955–14960. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b06197

    22. [22]

      Y. Segawa, T. Watanabe, K. Yamanoue, et al., Nat. Synth. 1 (2022) 535–541. doi: 10.1038/s44160-022-00075-8

    23. [23]

      B. Yao, X. Liu, T. Guo, et al., Org. Chem. Front. 9 (2022) 4171–4177. doi: 10.1039/d2qo00829g

    24. [24]

      D.M. Walba, R.M. Richards, R.C. Haltiwanger, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104 (1982) 3219–3221. doi: 10.1021/ja00375a051

    25. [25]

      J.F. Ayme, J.E. Beves, C.J. Campbell, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 1700–1712. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35229J

    26. [26]

      S. Wang, J. Yuan, J. Xie, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 18443–18447. doi: 10.1002/anie.202104054

    27. [27]

      J. Xie, X. Li, S. Wang, et al., Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 3348. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17134-3

    28. [28]

      J. Xie, X. Li, Z. Du, et al., CCS Chem. 5 (2023) 958–970. doi: 10.31635/ccschem.022.202202019

    29. [29]

      J. Yuan, W. Lv, A. Li, et al., Chem. Commun. 57 (2021) 12848–12851. doi: 10.1039/d1cc05581j

    30. [30]

      J. Yuan, Y. Song, X. Li, et al., Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 9554–9558. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c03781

    31. [31]

      S. Kim, Y. Kwon, J.P. Lee, et al., J. Mol. Struct. 655 (2003) 451–458. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2860(03)00326-0

    32. [32]

      M.F. Peintinger, J. Beck, T. Bredow, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 (2013) 18702–18709. doi: 10.1039/c3cp53410c

    33. [33]

      A. Panda, S.C. Menon, H.B. Singh, et al., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2005) 1114–1126. doi: 10.1002/ejic.200400757

    34. [34]

      S. Ji, H.E. Mard, M. Smet, et al., Sci. China Chem. 60 (2017) 1191–1196. doi: 10.1007/s11426-017-9059-4

    35. [35]

      J. Shang, B. Li, X. Shen, et al., J. Org. Chem. 86 (2021) 1430–1436. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c02083

    36. [36]

      H. Bock, A. Rauschenbach, C. Nather, et al., Phosphorus Sulfur 115 (1996) 51–83. doi: 10.1080/10426509608037954

  • Figure 1  Schematic representation of a pair of selenanthrene-bridged molecular cages composed of SeA and DB24C8.

    Figure 2  (a) Synthesis of selenanthrene-bridged cage 1a and 1b. Condition i: CuI, phenanthroline, K2CO3, dimethylacetamide, 150 ℃, 72 h. (b) Guest molecules employed in this study.

    Figure 3  (a) Experimental (red) and simulated (blue) isotopic distribution for [1a·Na]+ on mass spectroscopy; (b) Partial 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K) spectra of 1a (top) and 1b (bottom). *CHCl3.

    Figure 4  Crystal structures of 1a. Hydrogen bonds are highlighted in gray dash lines. Color code: Se = Orange, O = red, N = deep blue, C = light blue and gray, Cl = green, H = white.

    Figure 5  Crystal structures of 1b. Hydrogen bonds are highlighted in gray dash lines. Color code: S = Orange, O = red, N = deep blue, C = light blue and gray, Cl = green, H = white.

    Figure 6  (a) Schematic representation of twist migration in 1b. (b) VT 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD2Cl2) spectra (red trace) and simulation (black trace) with exchanging rates. (c) Eyring plot obtained from (b).

    Figure 7  Crystal structures of inclusion complex 1a·TCNB. Hydrogen bonds and ππ interactions are highlighted in dash lines. Color code: Se = orange, O = red, C = light blue and green, N = deep blue, F = purple, H = white.

    Figure 8  Crystal structures of complexes of 1a·TCNQ (a-c) and 1a·TCNQF (d). Hydrogen bonds and ππ interactions are highlighted in dash lines. Color code: Se = orange, O = red, C = light blue and green, N = deep blue, F = purple, H = white.

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  9
  • 文章访问数:  996
  • HTML全文浏览量:  38
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2023-11-15
  • 收稿日期:  2022-11-26
  • 接受日期:  2023-01-29
  • 修回日期:  2023-01-15
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-02-01
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章