A Polyanionic, Quasi-zero-strain and Open-framework K0.76V0.55Nb0.45OPO4 for Sodium-ion Batteries

Jian-Dong-Yong LIU Xu YU Jing-Ze BAO Ying-Xi LIN

Citation:  Jian-Dong-Yong LIU, Xu YU, Jing-Ze BAO, Ying-Xi LIN. A Polyanionic, Quasi-zero-strain and Open-framework K0.76V0.55Nb0.45OPO4 for Sodium-ion Batteries[J]. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2021, 40(12): 1631-1638. doi: 10.14102/j.cnki.0254-5861.2011-3221 shu

A Polyanionic, Quasi-zero-strain and Open-framework K0.76V0.55Nb0.45OPO4 for Sodium-ion Batteries

English

  • At present, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are ubiquitous through small consumer electronics, electric vehicles, and grid-scale energy storage systems. The rapid development of LIBs has led to the continuously increasing costs of Li resources and the sharp decrease in their amount[1]. To solve this problem, alternative batteries, such as Na, K-ion batteries, have been emerging. Compared with lithium, sodium is evenly distributed and rich in reserves (the fifth most abundant element in the earth's crust), which has attracted extensive attention in recent years[2]. However, the large ionic radius of Na+ (1.02 Å) results in the large volume expansion of the anode materials during sodiation/desodiation processes, causing structural instability and rapid degradation of capacities. Therefore, developing a new type of anode material with high stability[3, 4], long cycle life, and excellent rate performance is particularly crucial. Potential anode materials include carbon materials (hard carbon, soft carbon, etc.) and alloy compounds. However, they can hardly satisfy the requirements of anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. For example, the low working voltage makes the hard carbon form sodium dendrites easily during the sodiation process, causing safety problems[5]; alloy materials (such as Sb, WS2 and so on) often suffer a large volume expansion, which will destroy the electrode material structure and cause serious capacity degradation[6]. Therefore, it is particularly important to develop anode materials with a safe operating voltage and a stable structure.

    Polyanionic compounds, which have inorganic frameworks and high thermodynamic stability, perform well in sodium storage. The phosphate-based polyanions, such as LiFePO4, LiMnPO4, Li3V2(PO4)3 and Na3V2(PO4)3, have been extensively studied and explored as electrode materials for lithium/sodium-ion batteries. Compared with other anodes, phosphate-type polyanion compounds have higher structural stabilities; and strong covalent bonds give them good thermal stability and long cycle life. In addition, the phosphate (PO43-) allows fast ion diffusion in an inorganic framework and stabilizes the redox potentials[7-10]. So, phosphate-type polyanion compounds possess a higher operating voltage than carbon materials and can remain stable by avoiding the formation of sodium dendrites. Therefore, phosphate-type compounds have a potential as anode materials in sodium-ion batteries.

    In this work, a new type of inorganic framework material carbon-coated K0.76V0.55Nb0.45OPO4 (KVNP@C) was synthesized by a simple sol-gel method. The open framework enables reversible (de) intercalation of 0.75 Na+ performula unit, delivering a reversible capacity of 95.4 mAh/g and capacity retention of 75.9% after 100 cycles. Even at a high current density of 300 mA/g, it still delivers a considerable capacity of 53.5 mAh/g. The in-situ XRD analysis reveals a reversible single-phase solid solution reaction with a low lattice volume expansion during the cycling.

    The carbon-coated KVNP was synthesized by a sol-gel method. First, 2.27 g H2C2O4·2H2O and 0.5 g H5Nb3O10 were dissolved in 10 mL of deionized water, placed in an oil bath at 76 ℃, and stirred at 400 rpm for 2 h to obtain a clear solution A. Then, 1.26 g C6H8O7·H2O, 0.69 g NH4H2PO4, and 0.39 g NH4VO3 were dissolved in 5 mL of deionized water and stirred at 76 ℃ to obtain a dark blue solution B; 0.83 g K2CO3 was dissolved in 5 mL of deionized water to obtain a clear solution C; subsequently, solution C was slowly added dropwise to solution A. When the mixed solution no longer generated bubbles, solution B was added dropwise. After mixing, the solution was stirred in an oil bath at 76 ℃ at 400 rpm for 1 h to form a blue transparent solution. The formed gel was dried in an oven overnight at 120 ℃. Then the precursor was calcined at 350 ℃ for 4 h and then 900 ℃ for 20 h in an argon-hydrogen mixed atmosphere (Ar: H2 = 95:5) to obtain carbon-coated KVNP (KVNP@C).

    The XRD patterns were collected on a Rigaku Ultima IV powder X-ray diffractometer (Cu radiation). The microscopic morphology of the material was characterized by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi SU-8010) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI Tecnai G2 F20). The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used to characterize the elemental composition and distribution of KVNP@C. Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP, JY Ultima-2) was used to determine the content in KVNP@C.

    The active material (KVNP@C), conductive carbon black (Super P Carbon), and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) binder were mixed at a weight ratio of 8:1:1 and then stirred at 800 rpm for 12 h to obtain a uniform black slurry. Then, the black slurry was evenly coated on aluminum foil and placed in a vacuum oven at 100 ℃ for 12 h. The mass loading of the KVNP@C electrode is about 1.4 mg/cm2.

    The coin-type cells (CR2032) were used to assemble half-cells in a glove box filled with high-purity argon (both water content and oxygen content are less than 0.1 ppm). The electrolyte was 1 M NaClO4 in EC/DEC with 10% FEC. The in-situ battery used a self-made battery device.

    Galvanostatic cycling tests and rate performance tests were carried out on LAND-CT2011A battery-testing instruments under room temperature, where the voltage range was from 0.1 to 2.2 V (vs Na/Na+). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was measured on a CHI660E electrochemical workstation (Shanghai Chenhua, China) with a voltage range of 0.1~2.2 V (vs. Na/Na+). Rate-scan CV was performed on a Bio-Logic SP-300 electrochemical workstation with scan rates from 0.02 to 0.15 mV/s.

    An in-situ battery was made with a beryllium window capable of penetrating XRD rays, and a galvanostatic charge and discharge test at 10 mA/g was performed on LAND-CT2011A battery-testing instruments. In the meantime, XRD signals were continuously collected at a scanning rate of 5 °/minute by Rigaku Ultima IV powder XRD with Cu radiation at a voltage of 40 kV and a current of 40 mA.

    As illustrated in Fig. 1a, the KVNP@C is composed of NbO6/VO6 octahedra and PO4 tetrahedra with K-ions filled in the open channels, showing a typical KTiOPO4 (KTP) structure[11]. Besides, the elements of Nb prefer to occupy the center of octahedra, while the V occupies the center of the residual octahedra. The VO6 octahedron is more regular than NbO6[12], reducing the whole distortion degree of octahedra, which would greatly reduce the possibility of lattice deformation during the intercalation of sodium ions. Fig. 1b shows the results of X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) Rietveld refined of KVNP@C (Rwp = 6.87%, Rp = 4.96%). It can be seen that all the diffraction peaks are consistent with the theoretical values and indexed in an orthorhombic system. The unit cell parameters obtained by the refined structure are a = 12.93, b = 6.47 and c = 10.73 Å, respectively. The inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) result gave a K: V: Nb molar ratio of 0.76:0.55:0.45, so the chemical formula can be determined as K0.76V0.55Nb0.45OPO4. Due to the low potassium content in KVNP@C, a large number of vacancies and open channels are expected to host sodium-ions without damaging the structure. The SEM image (Fig. 1c) of KVNP@C exhibits a uniform particle size of about 500 nm. And, the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of KVNP@C shows a well-covered (the carbon layer is about 2 nm) KVNP with a lattice space of 0.56 nm, indexing to the (201) lattice plane (Fig. 1d). Furthermore, TEM-EDS mapping proves that various elements in the sample are uniformly distributed (Fig. 1e).

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  (a) Crystal structure diagram of KVNP; (b) XRD Rietveld refinement of KVNP@C (Rwp = 6.87%, Rp = 4.96%); (c) SEM image of KVNP@C; (d) TEM image of KVNP@C; e) EDS element distribution image of KVNP@C

    Fig. 2a presents the initial three cycles of cyclic voltammetry (CV) profiles at a scan rate of 0.1 mV/s. The reduction peak of the first cycle between 0.9 and 1.1 V (vs Na/Na+) corresponds to the intercalation of Na+ and the formation of solid electrolyte interface (SEI). The oxidation peaks at around 1.15 and 1.57 V correspond to the extraction of sodium ions. After the initial cycle, the CV curves of the following two circles almost overlap, indicating a highly reversible process. The inset in Fig. 2b is the first cycle voltage profile of KVNP@C/Na half-cells at a current density of 5 mA/g (rate of ~0.05 C), the reversible specific capacity of KVNP@C is 95.4 mAh/g (the volume energy density is 312.9 mAh/cm3), implying a 0.75 sodium-ion intercalation in each KVNP@C molecule (calculated based on the theoretical specific capacity). The initial Coulombic efficiency (CE) of 46.8% is mainly attributed to the formation of irreversible SEIs, which is common for anodes in sodium-ion batteries[13]. Even at such a low current density (5 mA/g), KVNP@C still exhibits a reversible specific capacity of 72.4 mAh/g after 100 cycles, remaining 75.9% of the initial capacity. The charge and discharge curves during the cycle are shown in Fig. 2c. The voltage profiles and the inset of the fifth dQ/dV curve indicate a voltage plateau of 0.99 V for the insertion of Na+ and a voltage of 1.05 V for the deintercalation of Na+ progress. The dQ/dV curve also shows a narrow polarization voltage for only 0.06 V. The voltage plateau can always be observed in the charge and discharge curves of different cycles, which is consistent with the CV profiles, indicating that KVNP@C can maintain a stable structure during the extraction/intercalation process. Compared with other polyanion anodes[14-26], KVNP@C has the lowest operating voltage (0.99 V), which is beneficial to achieve a higher energy density for the full-cell application.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (a) CV profiles of the KVNP@C electrode at a scan rate of 0.1 mV/s; (b) Galvanostatic cycling of the KVNP@C electrode at a current of 5 mA/g. The inset shows the voltage profile of the first cycle; (c) Voltage profiles of the KVNP@C electrode at a current of 5 mA/g. The inset is the corresponding dQ/dV curve at the fifth cycle; (d) Comparison of average platform voltages of polyanionic compounds

    Fig. 3 displays the long-cycling performance of KNVP@C, which was tested at current densities of 100 and 300 mA/g followed by two-cycles of activation at 5 mA/g. The KNVP@C delivers a reversible capacity of 79.9 mAh/g at 100 mA/g with a CE of 97.5%. After 1000 charge/discharge cycles, a capacity of 82.5% can be retained. Moreover, KNVP@C achieves a capacity of 53.5 mAh/g at the high rate of 300 mA/g, and the capacity increases to 66.1 mAh/g at the 296th cycle. The final capacity retention is 81.2% and an average CE of 99.8% can be achieved after 1500 cycles. The above results exhibit the excellent cycling stability of KNVP@C, attributed to the reducing structural distortion benefiting from Nb/V co-doping.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  (a, b) Electrochemical cycle performance of KVNP@C at current densities of 100 and 300 mA·g-1, respectively; Insets in (a) and (b) are the corresponding voltage profiles, respectively

    As shown in Fig. 4, rate CV was performed to investigate the Na+ storage kinetics of KVNP@C electrodes. The scanning voltage window and the scan rates were selected in a range of 0.1~2.2 V (vs Na/Na+) and from 0.02 to 0.15 mV/s, respectively. With the increase of scanning rate, the oxidation peak gradually shifts to the high voltage position, and the reduction peak shifts to the opposite direction. It shows that the faster scanning rates will affect the electrochemical oxidation-reduction process and cause electrochemical polarization. Then, we calculated the Na+ diffusion coefficients of KVNP@C electrodes by the Randles-Sevcik equation. To qualitatively analyze the contribution of diffusion and surface-induced capacitance, the functional relationship (Equation 1) between current (i) and scan rate (v) is shown as follows, where a and b are the adjustment constants.

    $ i = av^{b}\;\;\;\;\;\text{(equation 1)}^{[27]} $

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  (a) CV curves at various scan rates, (b) Fitting line of log (sweep rate, mV/s) vs. log (Ipeak, mA) of KVNP@C, (c) capacitive contributions at 0.04 mV/s, (d) Ratio of capacitive contribution at various scan rates, (e) Rate capability

    Generally, the value of b varies between 0.5 and 1.0. When the value of b is around 0.5, it indicates the electrochemical process controlled by diffusion behavior[28-30]; while the b-value of 1 refers to a surface-induced behavior, i.e. pseudocapacitance. Herein, the value of b is determined by slope of log(i) and log(v) obtained from CV curves (Fig. 4b), which shows values of 0.86 and 0.75 for peaks 1 and 2, respectively[31, 32]. It indicates that the electrochemical process of KVNP@C is partly controlled by capacitive behavior, resulting in the fast sodium-ion reaction kinetics.

    In detail, the contributions of capacitive and diffusion can be calculated based on equation 2:

    $ i(V) = k_{1}v + k_{2}v^{1/2} $

    (equation 2)

    where k1v and k2v1/2 represent surface capacitive and diffusion control processes, respectively. Fig. 4c presents the pseudocapacitance contribution of the KVNP@C electrode at a scan rate of 0.04 mV/s, in which the proportion is about 82.61%. The proportion of pseudocapacitance increases as the scan rate increases, which grows from 82.58% to 96.12%. The calculated results imply that the inorganic framework of KVNP@C can possess abundant pathways for the Na+ going through electrodes and electrolytes, leading to fast charge transfer for a better rate performance.

    Additionally, the rate performance is investigated at different current densities ranging from 5 to 500 mA/g (Fig. 4e). The KVNP@C/Na battery delivers charging capacity of 95.8, 91.6, 86.9, 82.6, 77.8, 69.2, 56.4, and 46.0 mAh/g at 5, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, 200, 300 and 500 mA/g, respectively. After two repeated rate cycles, the charge capacity still maintains 90.5 mAh/g when going back to the initial current density. Based on the above analysis, it can be shown that the KVNP@C anode boasts an excellent rate performance and long-cycle stability.

    To verify the structural evolution of the KVNP@C electrode during the intercalation/deintercalation of Na+, in-situ XRD technology was conducted (Fig. 5a and b). Three obvious peaks changed during Na+ (de)intercalation, which can be assigned to (201), (203), and (022) Bragg peaks. During the entire discharging process, all three peaks shift slightly toward a lower angle and there are no additional peaks emerging, which means the formation of solid solution in the compound. The charge follows the same but inverse peaks shifting, revealing a highly reversible phase change process. Fig. 5b shows the diffraction patterns at different states of charge. The lattice parameters obtained from Rietveld refinement have been summarized in Fig. 5e. The selected calculated results (Fig. 5d and f) show that the lattice constants a, b, and c increase from 12.86, 6.44, and 10.71 Å to 13.04, 6.50, and 10.98 Å, respectively (Rwp and Rp are 4.89%, 4.74%, and 2.26%, 2.23%, respectively). Consequently, despite the large size of Na+, the total volume difference between the original sample and fully discharged KVNP@C is only 4.76% (Fig. 5e), which is less than those of alloybased compounds (Sn4P3, Sb, Sn, P) and metal oxides (SnO2, Fe2O3)[33-38]. Compared with reported polyanionic materials in sodium ion batteries, KVNP@C shows the most minimal volume expansion (Fig. S1), revealing the superiority of its structure. Based on the above experimental results, we confirm that the small volume change is the key point that enables the great cycling stability of KVNP@C as a novel promising candidate anode for next-generation NIBs.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  (a) Contour plot and (b) line patterns of in-situ XRD patterns of the KVNP@C electrode with a different state of charge, and (c) the corresponding charge-discharge profile of the electrode, (d) XRD pattern and the corresponding Rietveld refinement of the initial KVNP@C, and (e) the sodiated KVNP@C, (f) Lattice-constant evolution upon cycling. Solid and dashed lines represent the discharging and charging process, respectively

    In summary, a new type of negative electrode material KVNP@C for sodium-ion batteries was successfully prepared by a simple sol-gel method. Electrochemical research results show that KVNP@C has excellent cycle stability and good rate performance. Under low current density discharge (5 mA/g), the capacity retention rate of KVNP@C is 75.9% after 100 cycles. Even at a high current density of 300 mA/g (≈ 3 C), the capacity retention rate and average Coulombic efficiency are 81.2% and 99.8% after 1500 cycles, respectively, indicating that the material has high reversibility of electrochemical sodium (de)intercalation. Kinetic mechanisms show that KVNP@C as an anode material has a rapid sodium-ion transfer rate. Moreover, the in-situ XRD analysis verified that the sodium-ion intercalation process of KVNP@C is a single-phase solid solution reaction with a lattice volume expansion of merely 4.76%. Based on the above analysis, KVNP@C material has high structural stability and good electrochemical performance, which has a potential to be applied to the anodes of next-generation sodium-ion batteries.


    1. [1]

      Muñoz-Márquez, M. Á.; Saurel, D.; Gómez-Cámer, J. L.; Casas-Cabanas, M.; Castillo-Martínez, E.; Rojo, T. Na-ion batteries for large scale applications: a review on anode materials and solid electrolyte interphase formation. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700463. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201700463

    2. [2]

      Kim, J.; Choi, M. S.; Shin, K. H.; Kota, M.; Kang, Y.; Lee, S.; Lee, J. Y.; Park, H. S. Rational design of carbon nanomaterials for electrochemical sodium storage and capture. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1803444. doi: 10.1002/adma.201803444

    3. [3]

      Ong, S. P.; Chevrier, V. L.; Hautier, G.; Jain, A.; Moore, C.; Kim, S.; Ma, X.; Ceder, G. Voltage, stability and diffusion barrier differences between sodium-ion and lithium-ion intercalation materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3680–3688. doi: 10.1039/c1ee01782a

    4. [4]

      Sun, Y.; Guo, S.; Zhou, H. Exploration of advanced electrode materials for rechargeable sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 9, 1800212.

    5. [5]

      Cao, Y.; Xiao, L.; Sushko, M. L.; Wang, W.; Schwenzer, B.; Xiao, J.; Nie, Z.; Saraf, L. V.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J. Sodium ion insertion in hollow carbon nanowires for battery applications. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3783–3787. doi: 10.1021/nl3016957

    6. [6]

      Wang, G. Z.; Feng, J. M.; Dong, L.; Li, X. F.; Li, D. J. Porous graphene anchored with Sb/sbox as sodium-ion battery anode with enhanced reversible capacity and cycle performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 693, 141–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.150

    7. [7]

      Tamaru, M.; Chung, S. C.; Shimizu, D.; Nishimura, S. I.; Yamada, A. Pyrophosphate chemistry toward safe rechargeable batteries. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 2538–2543. doi: 10.1021/cm4010739

    8. [8]

      Ellis, B. L.; Lee, K. T.; Nazar, L. F. Positive electrode materials for Li-ion and Li-batteries. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 691–714. doi: 10.1021/cm902696j

    9. [9]

      Palomares, V.; Serras, P.; Villaluenga, I.; Hueso, K. B.; Carretero-González, J.; Rojo, T. Na-ion batteries, recent advances and present challenges to become low cost energy storage systems. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5884–5901. doi: 10.1039/c2ee02781j

    10. [10]

      Zhu, C.; Song, K.; van Aken, P. A.; Maier, J.; Yu, Y. Carbon-coated Na3V2(PO4)3 embedded in porous carbon matrix: an ultrafast Na-storage cathode with the potential of outperforming Li cathodes. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2175–2180. doi: 10.1021/nl500548a

    11. [11]

      Bierlein, J. D.; Vanherzeele, H. Potassium titanyl phosphate-properties and new applications. J. Opt. Soc. AM. B 1989, 6, 622–633. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.6.000622

    12. [12]

      Rangan, K. K.; Verbaere, A.; Gopalakrishnan, J. Structure of KNb0.5V0.5OPO4, a KTiOPO4 analog. Mater. Res. Bull. 1998, 33, 395–399. doi: 10.1016/S0025-5408(97)00252-3

    13. [13]

      Bommier, C.; Ji, X. Electrolytes, sei formation, and binders: a review of nonelectrode factors for sodium-ion battery anodes. Small. 2018, 14, 1703576. doi: 10.1002/smll.201703576

    14. [14]

      Kim, J.; Seo, D. H.; Kim, H.; Park, I.; Yoo, J. K.; Jung, S. K.; Park, Y. U.; Goddard Iii, W. A.; Kang, K. Unexpected discovery of low-cost maricite NaFePO4 as a high-performance electrode for Na-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 540–545. doi: 10.1039/C4EE03215B

    15. [15]

      Liu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Han, X.; Pellegrinelli, C.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Wan, J.; Chung, A. C.; Vaaland, O.; Wang, C.; Hu, L. Porous amorphous FePO4 nanoparticles connected by single-wall carbon nanotubes for sodium ion battery cathodes. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 5664–5668. doi: 10.1021/nl302819f

    16. [16]

      Sun, Q.; Ren, Q. Q.; Fu, Z. W. Nasicon-type Fe2(MoO4)3 thin film as cathode for rechargeable sodium ion battery. Electrochem. Commun. 2012, 23, 145–148. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2012.07.023

    17. [17]

      Tripathi, R.; Wood, S. M.; Islam, M. S.; Nazar, L. F. Na-ion mobility in layered Na2FePO4F and olivine Na[Fe, Mn]PO4. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2257–2264. doi: 10.1039/c3ee40914g

    18. [18]

      Chen, C. Y.; Matsumoto, K.; Nohira, T.; Hagiwara, R. Na2MnSiO4 as a positive electrode material for sodium secondary batteries using an ionic liquid electrolyte. Electrochem. Commun. 2014, 45, 63–66. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2014.05.017

    19. [19]

      Kim, H.; Shakoor, R. A.; Park, C.; Lim, S. Y.; Kim, J. S.; Jo, Y. N.; Cho, W.; Miyasaka, K.; Kahraman, R.; Jung, Y.; Choi, J. W. Na2FeP2O7 as a promising iron-based pyrophosphate cathode for sodium rechargeable batteries: a combined experimental and theoretical study. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 1147–1155. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201201589

    20. [20]

      Fang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Xiao, L.; Ai, X.; Yang, H.; Cao, Y. High-performance olivine NaFePO4 microsphere cathode synthesized by aqueous electrochemical displacement method for sodium ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 17977–17984. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b04691

    21. [21]

      Yang, J.; Wang, H.; Hu, P.; Qi, J.; Guo, L.; Wang, L. A high-rate and ultralong-life sodium-ion battery based on NaTi2(PO4)3 nanocubes with synergistic coating of carbon and rutile TiO2. Small. 2015, 11, 3744–3749. doi: 10.1002/smll.201500144

    22. [22]

      Patoux, S.; Rousse, G.; Leriche, J. B.; Masquelier, C. Structural and electrochemical studies of rhombohedral Na2TiM(PO4)3 and Li1.6Na0.4TiM(PO4)3 (M: Fe, Cr) phosphates. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 2084–2093. doi: 10.1021/cm020479p

    23. [23]

      Chen, N.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, M.; Meng, X.; Wang, C.; Wei, Y.; Du, F.; Chen, G. Electrochemical properties and sodium-storage mechanism of Ag2Mo2O7 as the anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Chem-Eur. J. 2016, 22, 7248–7254. doi: 10.1002/chem.201600224

    24. [24]

      Gnanavel, M.; Raveau, B.; Pralong, V. Electrochemical Li/Na intercalation in TiOSO4, first member of the phosphate tungsten bronze-type family. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A465–A469. doi: 10.1149/2.0831503jes

    25. [25]

      Senguttuvan, P.; Rousse, G.; Vezin, H.; Tarascon, J. M.; Palacín, M. R. Titanium(Ⅲ) sulfate as new negative electrode for sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 2391–2393. doi: 10.1021/cm401181b

    26. [26]

      Mu, L.; Ben, L.; Hu, Y. S.; Li, H.; Chen, L.; Huang, X. Novel 1.5 V anode materials, ATiOPO4 (A = NH4, K, Na), for room-temperature sodium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 7141–7147. doi: 10.1039/C6TA00891G

    27. [27]

      Chen, C.; Wen, Y.; Hu, X.; Ji, X.; Yan, M.; Mai, L.; Hu, P.; Shan, B.; Huang, Y. Na+ intercalation pseudocapacitance in graphene-coupled titanium oxide enabling ultra-fast sodium storage and long-term cycling. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 1–8.

    28. [28]

      Zhao, G.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Hong, W.; Tian, Y.; Zhao, H.; Hu, J.; Zhou, L.; Hou, H.; Ji, X.; Mai, L. Nickel chelate derived NiS2 decorated with bifunctional carbon: an efficient strategy to promote sodium storage performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1803690. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201803690

    29. [29]

      Zou, G.; Hou, H.; Foster, C. W.; Banks, C. E.; Guo, T.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ji, X. Advanced hierarchical vesicular carbon co-doped with S, P, N for high-rate sodium storage. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800241. doi: 10.1002/advs.201800241

    30. [30]

      Lindström, H.; Södergren, S.; Solbrand, A.; Rensmo, H.; Hjelm, J.; Hagfeldt, A.; Lindquist, S. E. Li+ ion insertion in TiO2 (anatase). 2. Voltammetry on nanoporous films. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 7717–7722. doi: 10.1021/jp970490q

    31. [31]

      Augustyn, V.; Come, J.; Lowe, M. A.; Kim, J. W.; Taberna, P. L.; Tolbert, S. H.; Abruna, H. D.; Simon, P.; Dunn, B. High-rate electrochemical energy storage through Li+ intercalation pseudocapacitance. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 518–522. doi: 10.1038/nmat3601

    32. [32]

      Xiao, Y.; Wang, P. F.; Yin, Y. X.; Zhu, Y. F.; Niu, Y. B.; Zhang, X. D.; Zhang, J.; Yu, X.; Guo, X. D.; Zhong, B. H.; Guo, Y. G. Exposing active facets by multiple-layer oriented stacking nanosheets for high-performance capacitive sodium-ion oxide cathode. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1803765. doi: 10.1002/adma.201803765

    33. [33]

      Gu, M.; Kushima, A.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, J. G.; Liu, J.; Browning, N. D.; Li, J.; Wang, C. Probing the failure mechanism of SnO2 nanowires for sodium-ion batteries. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 5203–5211. doi: 10.1021/nl402633n

    34. [34]

      Liu, Y.; Zhang, N.; Jiao, L.; Chen, J. Tin nanodots encapsulated in porous nitrogen-doped carbon nanofibers as a free-standing anode for advanced sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 6702–6707. doi: 10.1002/adma.201503015

    35. [35]

      Liu, J.; Kopold, P.; Wu, C.; van Aken, P. A.; Maier, J.; Yu, Y. Uniform yolk-shell Sn4P3@C nanospheres as high-capacity and cycle-stable anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 3531–3538. doi: 10.1039/C5EE02074C

    36. [36]

      Liang, L.; Xu, Y.; Wang, C.; Wen, L.; Fang, Y.; Mi, Y.; Zhou, M.; Zhao, H.; Lei, Y. Large-scale highly ordered sb nanorod array anodes with high capacity and rate capability for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2954–2962. doi: 10.1039/C5EE00878F

    37. [37]

      Zhang, N.; Han, X.; Liu, Y.; Hu, X.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, J. 3D porous γ-Fe2O3@C nanocomposite as high-performance anode material of Na-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1401123. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201401123

    38. [38]

      Sun, J.; Lee, H. W.; Pasta, M.; Yuan, H.; Zheng, G.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Cui, Y. A phosphorene-graphene hybrid material as a high-capacity anode for sodium-ion batteries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 980–985. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.194

  • Figure 1  (a) Crystal structure diagram of KVNP; (b) XRD Rietveld refinement of KVNP@C (Rwp = 6.87%, Rp = 4.96%); (c) SEM image of KVNP@C; (d) TEM image of KVNP@C; e) EDS element distribution image of KVNP@C

    Figure 2  (a) CV profiles of the KVNP@C electrode at a scan rate of 0.1 mV/s; (b) Galvanostatic cycling of the KVNP@C electrode at a current of 5 mA/g. The inset shows the voltage profile of the first cycle; (c) Voltage profiles of the KVNP@C electrode at a current of 5 mA/g. The inset is the corresponding dQ/dV curve at the fifth cycle; (d) Comparison of average platform voltages of polyanionic compounds

    Figure 3  (a, b) Electrochemical cycle performance of KVNP@C at current densities of 100 and 300 mA·g-1, respectively; Insets in (a) and (b) are the corresponding voltage profiles, respectively

    Figure 4  (a) CV curves at various scan rates, (b) Fitting line of log (sweep rate, mV/s) vs. log (Ipeak, mA) of KVNP@C, (c) capacitive contributions at 0.04 mV/s, (d) Ratio of capacitive contribution at various scan rates, (e) Rate capability

    Figure 5  (a) Contour plot and (b) line patterns of in-situ XRD patterns of the KVNP@C electrode with a different state of charge, and (c) the corresponding charge-discharge profile of the electrode, (d) XRD pattern and the corresponding Rietveld refinement of the initial KVNP@C, and (e) the sodiated KVNP@C, (f) Lattice-constant evolution upon cycling. Solid and dashed lines represent the discharging and charging process, respectively

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  1
  • 文章访问数:  600
  • HTML全文浏览量:  2
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2021-12-01
  • 收稿日期:  2021-04-15
  • 接受日期:  2021-05-31
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章