Highly efficient and non-doped red conjugated polymer dot for photostable cell imaging

Mengqi Wu Qidong Wei Caihong Xian Chunlei Dai Xuehan He Changfeng Wu Guoming Sun Lei Chen

Citation:  Mengqi Wu, Qidong Wei, Caihong Xian, Chunlei Dai, Xuehan He, Changfeng Wu, Guoming Sun, Lei Chen. Highly efficient and non-doped red conjugated polymer dot for photostable cell imaging[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2023, 34(6): 107867. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107867 shu

Highly efficient and non-doped red conjugated polymer dot for photostable cell imaging

English

  • During the past decade, water dispersible and biocompatible conjugated polymer dots (Pdots) have emerged as a new generation fluorescent probe for biomedical applications [1-5]. Similar to inorganic semiconductor quantum dots (Qdots), Pdots exhibit much higher brightness (1~2 orders) than small molecular fluorescent probes while having no potential biotoxic issue of heavy-metallic Cd/Te atom containing Qdots [6]. In addition, they can be easily functionalized before or after the nanoformulation process through chemical bonding or physical blending methods for specific applications [7]. Pdots with various emissions ranging from deep-blue to second near-infrared window have been widely developed for cell and tissue imaging, bioassays, or optical diagnosis and therapy (optical therapeutic agents and nanocarriers for drug delivery) [8-14].

    Highly efficient blue, green and orange emissive Pdots with fluorescent quantum yield (ϕf) close to or above 30% have been obtained using non-doped polymers, like poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene) (PFO), poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene-alt-benzothiadiazole) (PFBT) and poly[2-methoxy-5-(2-ethylhexyloxy)-1,4-(1-cyanovinylene-1,4-phenylene)] (CN-PPV) [15-17]. However, red and near-infrared (NIR) Pdots based on homogenous polymers usually show quite low ϕf [18], mainly because of their intrinsically small ground-excited state energy gap (ΔES) and increased aggregation-induced quenching (AIQ) effect in condensed Pdot state [19], both of which may lead to enhanced non-radiative decay of excitons [20,21]. Red/NIR chromophores with rigid and planar structures can overcome the small ΔES nature and realize high ϕf in a diluted state because the non-radiative decay arising from molecular rotation and vibration can be effectively suppressed. Unfortunately, they tend to be severely self-quenching due to π-π stacking in the condensed state [22]. Therefore, people have primarily focused on ways to alleviate the AIQ effect and design red/NIR Pdots with high ϕf.

    One common method is incorporating red/NIR chromophores into a blue/green polymer backbone to form a binary or ternary host/dopant system [23]. However, only a small number of red/NIR dopants (usually ≤3 mol%) could be integrated into the blue/green polymer matrix due to the self-quenching issue at higher molarity, especially for those dyes with narrow-band emission feature such as BODIPY, cyanine, or squaraine derivatives [24,25]. The low content of red/NIR emitters in polymer systems could cause diminished photostability of the resulting Pdots under stronger, longer-time laser excitation [26]. Besides, this type of Pdots only has intensive absorption in the short ultraviolet/blue wavelength region, which is unwanted for in vivo applications.

    Efficient red/NIR Pdots based on non-doped polymers can be obtained by increasing the amphipathic surfactant to dilute the homogenous conjugated polymers in Pdots [27] but leading to a distinctly decreased extinction coefficient of the single nanoparticle. An alternative strategy is introducing highly twisted or aggregation-induced emission (AIE) moiety into the polymer backbone [22,28]. By replacing the 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (BT) electron withdrawing segment of classic PFDTBT red polymer with 6,7-difluoro-2,3-bis(3-(hexyloxy)phenyl)quinoxaline unit, Chan group obtained a homogenous and deep-red emissive polymer PFTC6FQ [23]. The corresponding Pdot exhibits a relatively high ϕf of 47%, which is the most efficient red Pdot based on non-doped polymer as we know. After incorporating a small amount of BODIPY-based NIR emitter into the PFTC6FQ backbone, the resulting PFTC6FQ-BPDIPY NIR Pdot exhibits a ϕf of 33% [26]. Recently, by further alternating the planar 9,9-dioxylfluorene segment of the PFTFQ-BODIPY with an AIE-active tetraphenylethene (TPE) unit or torsional pentiptycene (PPTC) segment, the ϕf of resulting Pdots can be significantly improved from 7% of PFTFQ-BODIPY to 37% of TPETFQ-BODIPY and 51% of PTTCTFQ-BODIPY [29]. Living cell or in vivo tissue fluorescence imaging was successfully illustrated using these deep-red or NIR Pdots. Despite the ultrahigh ϕf, red/NIR polymers mentioned above have two drawbacks. Firstly, these polymers were obtained by complicated synthetic routes. Secondly, the introduced AIE moiety/twisted structure usually causes interrupted π-conjugation of the polymer backbone. This leads to pronounced blue-shifted absorption bands (~30 nm) compared to classic red PFDTBT Pdot, which is undesired for in vivo fluorescent imaging.

    Herein, we report a non-doped poly(9,9-dihexylfluorene-alt-naphthothiadiazole) (PFNT) polymer as shown in Scheme 1. It can be easily synthesized from a commercially available monomer 4,9-dibromonaphthothiadiazole (NT-Br2, intermediate 2). The resulting PFNT Pdot shows a red emissive peak around 616 nm and a high ϕf up to 53.2%, among one of the most efficient red Pdots reported so far. Highly photostable living cell fluorescent imaging by confocal microscopy was achieved using the PFNT Pdot.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Synthetic routes of PFNT and PFDTBT polymers and illustration of the corresponding PFNT Pdot for cellular imaging.

    In this study, besides the ready availability, the NT unit was screened out as the building block for the following reasons. Firstly, it possesses a stronger electron-withdrawing ability due to one more benzene ring fused in its molecular structure than the benzothiadiazole (BT) unit. Due to enhanced molecular rigidity, its derivatives show red-shifted emission wavelengths with intrinsically high ϕf in single molecular status [30]. Secondly, the vertically extended phenyl ring of the NT core also leads to a larger twist angle with the neighboring segment [31], which can restrain the AIQ effect of its derivative emitters and remain high ϕf in the aggregated state [32,33]. Classic red polymer poly[(9,9-dihexyl-fluorene)-alt-(4,7-di-2-hexylthienyl-benzothiadiazole)] (PFDTBT) was also synthesized as a reference. The detailed synthesis and characterizations are shown in Supporting information.

    The corresponding PFNT and PFDTBT Pdots were prepared by the nanoprecipitation method as previously described [34]. We encapsulated conjugated polymer using amphiphilic polystyrene with carboxylated polyethylene glycol (PS-PEG-COOH). The morphology and size of PFNT and PFDTBT nanoparticles were studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS), as shown in Figs. 1A and B. As listed in Table 1, the number-average hydrodynamics size of PFNT/PFDTBT Pdot measured by DLS was around 28 nm and 30 nm, respectively.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  The size distribution by DLS and TEM image for PFNT (A) and PFDTBT (B) Pdot (TEM scale bar: 50 nm). Abs and FL spectra of PFNT (C) and PFDTBT (D) in Pdot aqueous and THF solution.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  The photophysical properties and size of polymers in THF and Pdot state.
    DownLoad: CSV

    We further investigated the photophysical properties of PFNT and PFDTBT polymers in diluted THF solution and their Pdots aqueous. The absolute ϕf was measured by an integrated sphere, and the results are listed in Table 1. Both polymers possess relatively high ϕf in THF solution, 81.2% for PFNT and 75.8% for PFDTBT. The PFNT Pdot remains a high ϕf of 53.2%, while the PFDTBT Pdots show a sharply decreased ϕf of 9.4%. These results confirm the AIQ effect of PFNT polymer was dramatically lightened in the condensed Pdot state. It can be ascribed to the large dihedral degree of NT derivatives, inhibiting unwanted intermolecular interaction in the aggregation state. The alleviated intermolecular interaction of PFNT Pdot can be further verified by the absorption (Abs) and fluorescence (FL) spectra. As shown in Fig. 1C, PFNT illustrates almost the same Abs and FL spectra in THF solution and Pdot state, with absorption peaks at ~509 nm and an emission peak at 616 nm. In comparison, PFDTBT exhibits visibly red-shifted Abs and FL spectra in the Pdot state (Fig. 1D), suggesting an unavoidable AIQ effect. These optical properties indicate that introducing the NT unit to design PFNT polymer is a practical approach to reduce the AIQ effect and realize efficiently non-doped red emissive Pdot.

    Next, we demonstrated the biological applicability of the non-doped PFNT Pdot. We first evaluated the cytotoxicity of PFNT Pdot towards MCF-7, HUVEC, and MDA-MB-231, three living cells, by MTT assay experiments. As shown in Fig. S1 (Supporting information), after 24 h of incubation with as high as 80 ppm PFNT Pdot, the cell viability has no significant decline. It demonstrates the excellent biocompatibility of PFNT Pdot, which is desirable for future biological applications. Then we performed fluorescence imaging on these three cells incubated with PFNT Pdot using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Fig. 2 shows the apparent internalization of PFNT Pdot (20 ppm) after 24 h of incubation with the nanoparticles. Cells could uptake Pdot predominately into lysosome subcellular organelle via endocytosis (Fig. S2 in Supporting information), as studied in the previous report [35]. After internalization, the red emissive fluorescence with extraordinary brightness appears in the cytoplasm, excluding the nuclei, illustrating the different cell morphology of the three cells. Generally, the Pdot nanoprobes are well dispersed in cells with a few aggregates because Pdots may generate clusters in the physiological environment [36]. In addition, the bright-field images showed that cells were in good condition with no significant sign of apoptosis or inflammation, making PFNT Pdot a distinguished fluorescent probe for living cell imaging. Moreover, after bioconjugation with streptavidin (SA), PFNT Pdot-SA bioconjugates can label subcellular organelles, such as cell membranes and microtubules (Figs. S3 and S4 in Supporting information).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Confocal fluorescence microscopy images of MCF-7, HUVEC, and MDA-MB-231 cells incubation with PFNT Pdot (Scale bar: 20 µm, λex: 561 nm).

    As mentioned above, one problem of dopant/host system-based Pdot probes is the declined photostability. It mainly originates from that part of the dopant emitters will be photobleached under strong and long-time laser excitation, along with an incomplete energy transfer from host to dopant. As a result, the photon budget from the dopant will decrease, and the host's fluorescence will increase. Theoretically, there should be no such problem for our non-doped PFNT Pdot. To investigate the photostability of PFNT Pdot, we performed the time-dependent dynamic confocal fluorescence images in labeled HUVEC cells, using two other commercial fluorescent dyes, Lyso-Tracker Red and CellTraceTM Red CMTPX, as references. Because these two dyes share a staining pattern of lysosomes or cytoplasm labeling, similar to PFNT Pdot, their chemical structures are shown in Scheme S1 (Supporting information). HUVEC cells were stained with red dyes according to the instructions. After incubating these three red fluorescent probes without any anti-photobleaching reagent, we recorded the confocal fluorescence images of labeled HUVEC cells at 5 s intervals under the same irradiation conditions. Fig. 3 presents the superior photostability of the PFNT Pdot probe. The cell brightness labeled with commercial dyes decreased within 10 s and was almost completely quenched within 60 s. However, cells treated with PFNT Pdots show continuously stable fluorescence in 60 s as expected, with bare photobleaching. Furthermore, we used ImageJ software to evaluate the mean fluorescence intensity of the rectangle area at different time points (Fig. S5 in Supporting information). After the 13th irradiation, the brightness of PFNT, Lyso-Tracker Red, and CellTraceTM Red CMTPX labeled cells are 94.0%, 25.1% and 8.9% of the initial value, respectively (Fig. 3D). These results reveal that the PFNT Pdot probe in cells owns much stronger photobleaching resistance than the reference dyes.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Dynamic fluorescence images of time-sequential scanning by CLSM of HUVEC cells incubated with Lyso-Tracker Red (A), CellTraceTM Red CMTPX (B), and PFNT Pdot (C). λex: 561 nm. Brightness ratio variations of the rectangle area at different time points (D).

    In summary, a non-doped and conjugated red polymer PFNT was easily obtained through a two-step synthesis by introducing a commercially available NT unit as the building block. Due to the significantly impeded AIQ effect, the corresponding PFNT Pdot exhibits an extraordinarily high ϕf of 53.2%, one of the most efficient red Pdots reported so far. It has low cytotoxicity verified by MTT assays. And in vitro fluorescent imaging of a series of living cells was demonstrated by simply endocytosing the PFNT Pdot. More importantly, PFNT Pdot presents excellent photostability compared to reference red dyes. This property is beneficial for long-time observation of cell activities, including proliferation and apoptosis, which could be utilized for potential applications such as neurosciences and pharmacy.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    We gratefully thank the support of the Hundred Talents Program of Sun Yat-sen University (No. 76190-18841211), Hebei DHRSS Research Fund, China (No. E2019100005), and the High-level Talents Research Star-up Project of Hebei University (No. 521000981336).

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107868.


    1. [1]

      J. Li, R. Jiang, Q. Wang, et al., Biomaterials 217 (2019) 119304. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119304

    2. [2]

      C. Xie, W. Zhou, Z. Zeng, et al., Chem. Sci 11 (2020) 10553-10570. doi: 10.1039/d0sc01721c

    3. [3]

      Y. Cai, Z. Wei, C. Song, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 48 (2019) 22-37. doi: 10.1039/c8cs00494c

    4. [4]

      Y.Duan Kenry, B. Liu, Adv. Mater. 30 (2018) 1802394. doi: 10.1002/adma.201802394

    5. [5]

      X. Fu, H. Bai, F. Lyu, et al., Chem. Res. Chin. U. 36 (2020) 237-242. doi: 10.1007/s40242-020-0012-7

    6. [6]

      C. Wu, D.T. Chiu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52 (2013) 3086-3109. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205133

    7. [7]

      J. Yu, C. Wu, Z. Tian, et al., Nano Lett. 12 (2012) 1300-1306. doi: 10.1021/nl203784m

    8. [8]

      J. Li, K. Pu, Chem. Soc. Rev. 48 (2019) 38-71. doi: 10.1039/c8cs00001h

    9. [9]

      Y. Yuan, W. Hou, W. Qin, et al., Biomater. Sci. 9 (2021) 328-346. doi: 10.1039/d0bm01038c

    10. [10]

      N. Alifu, A. Zebibula, H. Zhang, et al., Nano Res. 13 (2020) 2632-2640. doi: 10.1007/s12274-020-2902-x

    11. [11]

      H. Chen, J. Yu, J. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 19331-19336. doi: 10.1002/anie.202106156

    12. [12]

      Y. Tang, Z. Meng, H. Xu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 28 (2017) 2164-2168. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.08.015

    13. [13]

      P. Yang, X. Zhou, J. Zhang, et al., Green Chem. 23 (2021) 1834-1839. doi: 10.1039/d0gc02824j

    14. [14]

      Z. Li, T. Wang, F. Zhu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 783-786. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.05.021

    15. [15]

      C. Wu, B. Bull, C. Szymanski, et al., ACS Nano 2 (2008) 2415-2423. doi: 10.1021/nn800590n

    16. [16]

      X. Zhang, J. Yu, C. Wu, et al., ACS Nano 6 (2012) 5429-5439. doi: 10.1021/nn301308w

    17. [17]

      J. Sun, H. Mel, S. Wang, et al., Anal. Chem. 88 (2016) 7372-7377. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01929

    18. [18]

      L. Chen, D. Chen, Y. Jiang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 7008-7012. doi: 10.1002/anie.201902077

    19. [19]

      J. Qi, C. Sun, D. Li, et al., ACS Nano 12 (2018) 7936-7945. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b02452

    20. [20]

      Z. Zhang, X. Fang, Z. Liu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 3691-3698. doi: 10.1002/anie.201914397

    21. [21]

      X. Cai, B. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 9868-9886. doi: 10.1002/anie.202000845

    22. [22]

      S. Liu, H. Ou, Y. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 15146-15156. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c07193

    23. [23]

      H. Liu, P. Wu, S. Kuo, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 10420-10429. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b06710

    24. [24]

      I.C. Wu, J. Yu, F. Ye, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 173-178. doi: 10.1021/ja5123045

    25. [25]

      B. Andreiuk, A. Reisch, M. Lindecker, et al., Small 13 (2017) 1701582. doi: 10.1002/smll.201701582

    26. [26]

      C. Ke, C. Fang, J. Yan, et al., ACS Nano 11 (2017) 3166-3177. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b00215

    27. [27]

      S. Wang, J. Liu, G. Feng, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 (2019) 1808365. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201808365

    28. [28]

      S. Xu, Y. Duan, B. Liu, Adv. Mater. 32 (2020) 1903530. doi: 10.1002/adma.201903530

    29. [29]

      W. Tsai, C. Wang, C. Liao, et al., Chem. Sci. 10 (2019) 198-207. doi: 10.1039/c8sc03510e

    30. [30]

      L. Chen, L. Wang, X. Jing, et al., J. Mater. Chem. 21 (2011) 10265-10267. doi: 10.1039/c1jm11204j

    31. [31]

      W. Li, Y. Pan, L. Yao, et al., Adv. Opt. Mater. 2 (2014) 892-901. doi: 10.1002/adom.201400154

    32. [32]

      L. Chen, X. He, Y. Zhao, Mater. Adv. 2 (2021) 6068-6074. doi: 10.1039/d1ma00602a

    33. [33]

      L. Chen, H. Tong, Z. Xie, et al., J. Mater. Chem. 21 (2011) 15773-15779. doi: 10.1039/c1jm12549d

    34. [34]

      L. Chen, L. Wu, J. Yu, et al., Chem. Sci. 8 (2017) 7236-7245. doi: 10.1039/C7SC03448B

    35. [35]

      L.P. Fernando, P.K. Kandel, J. Yu, et al., Biomacromolecules 11 (2010) 2675-2682. doi: 10.1021/bm1007103

    36. [36]

      Y. Jin, F. Ye, C. Wu, et al., Chem. Commun. 48 (2012) 3161-3163. doi: 10.1039/c2cc17703j

  • Scheme 1  Synthetic routes of PFNT and PFDTBT polymers and illustration of the corresponding PFNT Pdot for cellular imaging.

    Figure 1  The size distribution by DLS and TEM image for PFNT (A) and PFDTBT (B) Pdot (TEM scale bar: 50 nm). Abs and FL spectra of PFNT (C) and PFDTBT (D) in Pdot aqueous and THF solution.

    Figure 2  Confocal fluorescence microscopy images of MCF-7, HUVEC, and MDA-MB-231 cells incubation with PFNT Pdot (Scale bar: 20 µm, λex: 561 nm).

    Figure 3  Dynamic fluorescence images of time-sequential scanning by CLSM of HUVEC cells incubated with Lyso-Tracker Red (A), CellTraceTM Red CMTPX (B), and PFNT Pdot (C). λex: 561 nm. Brightness ratio variations of the rectangle area at different time points (D).

    Table 1.  The photophysical properties and size of polymers in THF and Pdot state.

    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  7
  • 文章访问数:  415
  • HTML全文浏览量:  47
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2023-06-15
  • 收稿日期:  2022-06-20
  • 接受日期:  2022-09-28
  • 修回日期:  2022-09-16
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-10-01
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章