电化学氢压缩和纯化与竞争技术的对比:I.优缺点

引用本文: Maha Rhandi, Marine Trégaro, Florence Druart, Jonathan Deseure, Marian Chatenet. 电化学氢压缩和纯化与竞争技术的对比:I.优缺点[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(5): 756-769. doi: S1872-2067(19)63404-2 shu

Citation: Maha Rhandi, Marine Trégaro, Florence Druart, Jonathan Deseure, Marian Chatenet. Electrochemical hydrogen compression and purification versus competing technologies: Part I. Pros and cons[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2020, 41(5): 756-769. doi: S1872-2067(19)63404-2 shu

电化学氢压缩和纯化与竞争技术的对比:I.优缺点

格勒诺布尔阿尔卑斯大学, 勃朗峰大学, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, LEPMI, 38000格勒诺布尔, 法国

摘要: 毫无疑问，氢将在我们未来的能量组合中发挥重要作用，因为它可以储存可再生电（电-氢）并在燃料电池中可逆地转化为电能，更不用说它在（石油）化学工业中的广泛应用了.然而，在这些应用中需要纯氢，而如今的制氢仍主要基于化石燃料，因而不能被视为纯氢.因此，大规模的氢气净化是必须的.此外，氢是最轻的气体，它的体积能量含量远远低于它的竞争燃料，除非它在高压下被压缩（通常70MPa），使压缩不可避免.本文将详细说明目前可用于氢气净化和压缩的方法.这将表明在现有的技术中，也可以实现氢气净化的电化学氢压缩机（EHC）与目前工业规模上使用的经典技术相比具有许多优势.EHC有其热力学和操作上的优点，但也易于使用.然而，只有达到足够的性能，EHCs的部署才是可行的，这意味着他们的基础材料应遵守一些规范.本文将详述这些规范.

关键词:

English

Electrochemical hydrogen compression and purification versus competing technologies: Part I. Pros and cons

Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, Grenoble-INP, LEPMI, 38000 Grenoble, France
Received Date: 20 May 2019
Revised Date: 15 July 2019

Abstract: It is undisputed that hydrogen will play a great role in our future energetic mix, because it enables the storage of renewable electricity (power-to-H₂) and the reversible conversion into electricity in fuel cell, not to speak of its wide use in the (petro)chemical industry. Whereas in these applications, pure hydrogen is required, today's hydrogen production is still largely based on fossil fuels and can therefore not be considered pure. Therefore, purification of hydrogen is mandatory, at a large scale. In addition, hydrogen being the lightest gas, its volumetric energy content is well-below its competing fuels, unless it is compressed at high pressures (typically 70 MPa), making compression unavoidable as well. This contribution will detail the means available today for both purification and for compression of hydrogen. It will show that among the available technologies, the electrochemical hydrogen compressor (EHC), which also enables hydrogen purification, has numerous advantages compared to the classical technologies currently used at the industrial scale. EHC has their thermodynamic and operational advantages, but also their ease of use. However, the deployment of EHCs will be viable only if they reach sufficient performances, which implies some specifications that their base materials should stick to. The present contribution will detail these specifications.

Key words:

1. [1] A. F. Ghoniem, Prog. Energy Combus. Sci., 2011, 37, 15-51.
2. [2] N. A. Kelly, T. L. Gibson, D. B. Ouwerkerk, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33, 2747-2764.
3. [3] www.energy.gov, Last access:Feb 2, 2019.
4. [4] M. Yáñez, A. Ortiz, B. Brunaud, I. E. Grossmann, I. Ortiz, Appl. Energy, 2018, 231, 777-787.
5. [5] T. da Silva Veras, T. S. Mozer, D. da Costa Rubim Messeder dos Santos, A. da Silva César, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, 2018-2033.
6. [6] I. Dincer, C. Acar, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40, 11094-11111.
7. [7] J.-P. Magnin, J. Deseure, Appl. Energy, 2019, 239, 635-643.
8. [8] ISO 14687-2:2012, 2012.
9. [9] ISO 14687-3:2014, 2014.
10. [10] G. Sdanghi, G. Maranzana, A. Celzard, V. Fierro, Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev., 2019, 102, 150-170.
11. [11] J. Bonjour, J.-B. Chalfen, F. Meunier, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2002, 41, 5802-5811.
12. [12] F. D. Rossini, Pure Appl. Chem., 1970, 22, 555-570.
13. [13] G. Q. (UOP Miller Tarrytown, NY (US)) and J. (Union C. B. Stoecker N. V. Antwerp (BE)), Research Org.:None, 1989.
14. [14] R. Agrawal, S. R. Auvil, S. P. DiMartino, J. S. Choe, J. A. Hopkins, Gas Sep. Purif., 1988, 2, 9-15.
15. [15] S. Sircar, T. C. Golden, Sep. Sci. Technol., 2000, 35, 667-687.
16. [16] M. Mondal, A. Datta, Int. J. Energy Res., 2017, 41, 448-458.
17. [17] A. Abdeljaoued, F. Relvas, A. Mendes, M. H. Chahbani, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 338-355.
18. [18] V. I. Agueda, J. A. Delgado, M. A. Uguina, P. Brea, A. I. Spjelkavik, R. Blom, C. Grande, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2015, 124, 159-169.
19. [19] J. Xiao, L. Fang, P. Bénard, R. Chahine, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43, 13962-13974.
20. [20] A. Yokozeki, M. B. Shiflett, Appl. Energy, 2007, 84, 351-361.
21. [21] N. A. Al-Mufachi, N. V. Rees, R. Steinberger-Wilkens, Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev., 2015, 47, 540-551.
22. [22] M. Hong, S. Li, J. L. Falconer, R. D. Noble, J. Membrane Sci., 2008, 307, 277-283.
23. [23] R. D. Noble, S. A. Stern, Ed., Membrane separations technology:principles and applications, 2nd. impression. Elsevier:Amsterdam, 1995.
24. [24] D. Bastani, N. Esmaeili, M. Asadollahi, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2013, 19, 375-393.
25. [25] P. C. K. Vesborg, T. F. Jaramillo, RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 7933.
26. [26] M. D. Dolan, D. M. Viano, M. J. Langley, K. E. Lamb, J. Membrane Sci., 2018, 549, 306-311.
27. [27] Z. Zhu, J. Hou, W. He, W. Liu, J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 660, 231-234.
28. [28] E. Rebollo, C. Mortalo, S. Escolastico, S. Boldrini, S. Barison, J. M. Serra, M. Fabrizio, Energy Environ. Sci., 2015, 8, 3675-3686.
29. [29] J. M. Sedlak, J. F. Austin, A. B. Laconti, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 1981, 6, 45-51.
30. [30] R. L. Michael, Grant, Robert, Bruce, R. Lambert Michael and Grant, Robert, Bruce, 04-Oct-2007.
31. [31] A. Golmakani, S. Fatemi, J. Tamnanloo, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2017, 176, 73-91.
32. [32] G. Petitpas, S. M. Aceves, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39, 20319-20323.
33. [33] W. Vielstich, Ed., Fuel cell technology and applications:pt. 1, Reprinted. Wiley:Chichester, 2007.
34. [34] W. Vielstich, H. Yokokawa, H. Gasteiger, Eds., Advances in Electrocatalysis, Materials, Diagnostics and Durability; part 2. Wiley:Chichester, 2009.
35. [35] A. Midilli, M. Ay, I. Dincer, M. A. Rosen, Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev., 2005, 9, 255-271.
36. [36] R. Khaksarfard, M. R. Kameshki, M. Paraschivoiu, Shock Waves, 2010, 20, 205-216.
37. [37] E. L. Broerman, J. Bennett, N. Poerner, D. Strickland, J. Helffrich, S. Coogan, A. Rimpel, P. Bueno, DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program. FY 2015 Annual Progress Report, 2016.
38. [38] H. Jiang, K. Liang, Z. Li, Mechan. Sys. Signal Processing, 2019, 121, 828-840.
39. [39] R. L. Unger, Proceedings of International Compressor Engineering, 1998.
40. [40] K. Liang, R. Stone, M. Dadd, P. Bailey, Int. J. Refrig., 2016, 66, 32-40.
41. [41] K. Liang, R. Stone, M. Dadd, P. Bailey, Int. J. Refrig., 2014, 40, 450-459.
42. [42] K. Liang, Int. J. Refrig., 2017, 84, 253-273.
43. [43] N. A. Kermani, I. Petrushina, A. Nikiforov, J. O. Jensen, M. Rokni, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41, 16688-16695.
44. [44] Z. Lei, C. Dai, B. Chen, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 1289-1326.
45. [45] S. Werner, M. Haumann, P. Wasserscheid, Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng., 2010, 1, 203-230.
46. [46] T. Predel, E. Schlücker, P. Wasserscheid, D. Gerhard, W. Arlt, Chem. Eng. Technol., 2007, 30, 1475-1480.
47. [47] J. D. Van de Ven, P. Y. Li, Appl. Energy, 2009, 86, 2183-2191.
48. [48] M. Mayer, A3PS Conference, 2014.
49. [49] M. V. Lototskyy, V. A. Yartys, B. G. Pollet, R. C. Bowman, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39, 5818-5851.
50. [50] V. A. Yartys, G. Vijayaprasath, R. Murugan, S. Asaithambi, G. Anandha Babu, P. Sakthivel, T. Mahalingam, Y. Hayakawa, G. Ravi, Appl. Phys. A, 2016, 122, 122.
51. [51] F. Laurencelle, Z. Dehouche, F. Morin, J. Goyette, J. Alloys Compd, 2009, 475, 810-816.
52. [52] M. Bampaou, K. D. Panopoulos, A. I. Papadopoulos, P. Seferlis, S. Voutetakis, Chem. Eng. Trans., 2018, 70, 1213-1218.
53. [53] R. Ströbel, M. Oszcipok, M. Fasil, B. Rohland, L. Jörissen, J. Garche, J. Power Sources, 2002, 105, 208-215.
54. [54] P. J. Bouwman, J. Konink, D. Semerel, L. Raymakers, M. Koeman, W. Dalhuijsen, E. Milacic, M. Mulder, ECS Trans., 2014, 64, 1009-1018.
55. [55] C. Casati, P. Longhi, L. Zanderighi, F. Bianchi, J. Power Sources, 2008, 180, 103-113.
56. [56] H. Monjid, DOE Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Program, 14-Jun-2018.
57. [57] J. Catalano, A. Bentien, D. N. Østedgaard-Munck, S. Kjelstrup, J. Membrane Sci., 2015, 478, 37-48.
58. [58] T. Sakai, H. Takenaka, N. Wakabayashi, Y. Kawami, E. Torikai, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1985, 132, 1328-1332.
59. [59] R. P. W. J. Struis, S. Stucki, M. Wiedorn, J. Membrane Sci., 1996, 113, 93-100.
60. [60] P. Bouwman, Fuel Cells Bull., 2014, 2014, 12-16.
61. [61] L. Lipp, DOE——FCE003727, 1235441, 2016.
62. [62] B. Rohland, K. Eberle, R. Ströbel, J. Scholta, J. Garche, Electrochim. Acta, 1998, 43, 3841-3846.
63. [63] B. M. Besancon, V. Hasanov, R. Imbault-Lastapis, R. Benesch, M. Barrio, M. J. Mølnvik, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34, 2350-2360.
64. [64] K. Onda, K. Ichihara, M. Nagahama, Y. Minamoto, T. Araki, J. Power Sources, 2007, 164, 1-8.
65. [65] M. Chatenet, L. Dubau, N. Job, F. Maillard, Catal. Today, 2010, 156, 76-86.
66. [66] T. A. Zawodzinski, M. Neeman, L. O. Sillerud, S. Gottesfeld, J. Phys. Chem., 1991, 95, 6040-6044.
67. [67] T. E. Springer, T. A. Zawodzinski, S. Gottesfeld, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1991, 138, 2334.
68. [68] J. T. Hinatsu, M. Mizuhata, H. Takenaka, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1994, 141, 1493.
69. [69] S. Ge, X. Li, B. Yi, I.-M. Hsing, J. Electrochem. Soc, 2005, 152, A1149.
70. [70] A. Kusoglu, B. L. Kienitz, A. Z. Weber, J. Electrochem. Soc, 2011, 158, B1504.
71. [71] P. W. Majsztrik, M. B. Satterfield, A. B. Bocarsly, J. B. Benziger, J. Membrane Sci., 2007, 301, 93-106.
72. [72] D. M. Bernardi, M. W. Verbrugge, AIChE J., 1991, 37, 1151-1163.
73. [73] D. Bessarabov, H. Wang, H. Li, N. Zhao, Eds., PEM Electrolysis for Hydrogen Production:Principles and Applications. CRC Press, 2015.
74. [74] S. S. Kocha, J. D. Yang, J. S. Yi, AIChE J., 2006, 52, 1916-1925.
75. [75] X. Cheng, J. Zhang, Y. Tang, C. Song, J. Shen, D. Song, J. Zhang, J. Power Sources, 2007, 167, 25-31.
76. [76] N. T. Truc, S. Ito, K. Fushinobu, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2018, 127, 447-456.
77. [77] A. Brunetti, E. Fontananova, A. Donnadio, M. Casciola, M. L. Di Vona, E. Sgreccia, E. Drioli, G. Barbieri, J. Power Sources, 2012, 205, 222-230.
78. [78] K. D. Baik, B. K. Hong, M. S. Kim, Renew. Energy, 2013, 57, 234-239.
79. [79] H. K. Lee, H. Y. Choi, K. H. Choi, J. H. Park, T. H. Lee, J. Power Sources, 2004, 132, 92-98.
80. [80] S. A. Grigoriev, I. G. Shtatniy, P. Millet, V. I. Porembsky, V. N. Fateev, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36, 4148-4155.
81. [81] M. Mukaddam, E. Litwiller, I. Pinnau, Macromolecules, 2016, 49, 280-286.
82. [82] V. A. Sethuraman, S. Khan, J. S. Jur, A. T. Haug, J. W. Weidner, Electrochim. Acta, 2009, 54, 6850-6860.
83. [83] S. Suzuki, H. Muroyama, T. Matsui, K. Eguchi, J. Power Sources, 2012, 208, 257-262.
84. [84] Y. He, E. L. Cussler, J. Membrane Sci., 1992, 68, 43-52.
85. [85] F. Barbir, H. Görgün, J. Appl. Electrochem., 2007, 37, 359-365.

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 9
文章访问数: 1628
HTML全文浏览量: 104

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

电化学氢压缩和纯化与竞争技术的对比:I.优缺点

English

Electrochemical hydrogen compression and purification versus competing technologies: Part I. Pros and cons

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

电化学氢压缩和纯化与竞争技术的对比:I.优缺点

English

Electrochemical hydrogen compression and purification versus competing technologies: Part I. Pros and cons

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs