English

Influence of Polyvinylpyrrolidone Capping Ligands on Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Methanol and Ethanol over Palladium Nanocrystal Electrocatalysts

• Huimei Duan ^{1, ,} ,
• Huijuan Wang ^2, ,
• Weixin Huang ^{1, ,}

• 1.

  School of Chemistry and Materials Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

• 2.

  Experimental Center of Engineering and Material Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Corresponding author: Huimei Duan, duanhm@mail.ustc.edu.cn; Weixin Huang, huangwx@ustc.edu.cn

• Received Date: 02 March 2020
  Revised Date: 02 April 2020
  Available Online: 15 October 2021
• Fund Project:

  National Natural Science Foundation of China 

  the Changjiang Scholars Program of the Chinese Ministry of Education 

Abstract: Direct alcohol fuel cells (DAFCs) have attracted considerable research interest because of their potential application as alternative power sources for automotive systems and portable electronics. Pd-based catalysts represent one of the most popular catalysts for DAFCs due to their excellent electrocatalytic activities in alkaline electrolytes. Thus, it is of great importance to understand the structure-activity relationship of Pd electrocatalysts for alcohol electrocatalysis. Recently, size- and shape- controlled Pd nanocrystals have been successfully synthesized and subsequently used to study the size and shape effects of Pd electrocatalysts on alcohol electrocatalysis, in which the Pd (100) facet exhibited higher electrocatalytic oxidation activity for small alcohol molecules than the Pd (111) and (110) facets. Although it is well known that capping ligands, which are widely used in wet chemistry for the size- and shape-controlled synthesis of metal nanocrystals, likely chemisorb onto the surfaces of the resulting metal nanocrystals and influence their surface structure and surface-mediated properties, such as catalysis, this issue was not considered in previous studies of Pd nanocrystal electrocatalysts for electrocatalytic oxidation of small alcohol molecules. In this study, we prepared polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-capped Pd nanocrystals with different morphologies and sizes and comparatively studied their electrocatalytic activities for methanol and ethanol oxidation in alkaline solutions. The chemisorbed PVP molecules transferred charge to the Pd nanocrystals, and the finer Pd nanocrystals had a higher coverage of chemisorbed PVP, and thus exposed fewer accessible surface sites, experienced more extensive PVP-to-Pd charge transfer, and were more negatively charged. The intrinsic electrocatalytic activity, represented by the electrochemical surface area (ECSA)-normalized electrocatalytic activity, of Pd nanocubes with exposed (100) facets increases with the particle size, indicating that the more negatively-charged Pd surface is less electrocatalytically active. The Pd nanocubes with average sizes between 12 and 19 nm are intrinsically more electrocatalytically active than commercial Pd black electrocatalysts, while the activity of Pd nanocubes with an averages size of 8 nm is less. This suggests that the enhancement effect of the exposed (100) facets surpasses the deteriorative effect of the negatively charged Pd surface for the Pd nanocubes with average sizes between 12 and 19 nm, whereas the deteriorative effect of the negatively charged Pd surface surpasses the enhancement effect of the exposed (100) facets for the Pd nanocubes with average sizes of 8 nm due to the extensive PVP-to-Pd charge transfer. Moreover, the Pd nanocubes with average sizes of 8 nm exhibit similar intrinsic electrocatalytic activity to the Pd nanooctahedra with (111) facets exposed and average sizes of 7 nm, indicating that the electronic structure of Pd electrocatalysts plays a more important role in influencing the electrocatalytic activity than the exposed facet. Since the chemisorbed PVP molecules block the surface sites on Pd nanocrystals that are accessible to the reactants, all Pd nanocrystals exhibit lower mass-normalized electrocatalytic activity than the Pd black electrocatalysts, and the mass-normalized electrocatalytic activity increases with the ECSA. These results clearly demonstrate that the size- and shape-dependent electrocatalytic activity of Pd nanocrystals capped with PVP for methanol and ethanol oxidation should be attributed to both the exposed facets of the Pd nanocrystals and the size-dependent electronic structures of the Pd nanocrystals resulting from the size-dependent PVP coverage and PVP-to-Pd charge transfer. Therefore, capping ligands on capped metal nanocrystals inevitably influence their surface structures and surface-mediated properties, which must be considered for a comprehensive understanding of the structure-activity relationship of capped metal nanocrystals.

Key words:
• PVP
•  /  Surface structure
•  /  Surface site
•  /  Morphology
•  /  Size

• 1. [1]

     Rabis, A.; Rodriguez, P.; Schmidt, T. J. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 864. doi: 10.1021/cs3000864

  2. [2]

     Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. F.; Chen, Z. L.; Liu, Y. W.; Zhang, M. M.; Han, X. P. Zhong, C.; Hu, W. B.; Deng, Y. D. Sci. China Mater. 2018, 61, 697. doi: 10.1007/s40843-017-9157-9

  3. [3]

     Zhao, X. Y.; Zhao, H. C.; Sun, J. F.; Li, G.; Liu, R. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.01.005R

  4. [4]

     Bianchini, C.; Shen, P. K. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4183. doi: 10.1021/cr9000995

  5. [5]

     钱慧慧, 韩潇, 肇研, 苏玉芹.物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 1822. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201705022Qian, H. H.; Han, X.; Zhao, Y.; Su, Y. Q. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 1822. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201705022

  6. [6]

     Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Du, C.; Zhuang, Z.; Zheng, F.; Li, P.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, W. Sci. China Chem. 2019, 62, 378. doi: 10.1007/s11426-018-9375-2

  7. [7]

     蔡育芬, 刘军民, 廖世军.物理化学学报, 2007, 23, 92. doi: 10.1016/S1872-1508(07)60010-2Cai, Y. F.; Liu, J. M.; Liao, S. J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2007, 23, 92. doi: 10.1016/S1872-1508(07)60010-2

  8. [8]

     Zhang, H. M. He, J. Zhai, C. Y. Zhu, M. S. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2019, 30, 2338. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.07.021

  9. [9]

     方波, 冯立纲.物理化学学报, 2020, 36, 1905023. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905023Fang, B.; Feng, L. G. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2020, 36, 1905023. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201905023

  10. [10]

      Gao, D. F.; Zhou, H.; Wang, J.; Miao, S.; Yang, F.; Wang, G. X.; Wang, J. G.; Bao, X. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4288. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00046

  11. [11]

      Jin, M.; Zhang, H.; Xie, Z.; Xia, Y. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6352. doi: 10.1039/C2EE02866B

  12. [12]

      Shao, M.; Odell, J.; Humbert, M.; Yu, T.; Xia, Y. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 4172. doi: 10.1021/jp312859x

  13. [13]

      Wang, E. D.; Xu, J. B.; Zhao, T. S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 10489. doi: 10.1021/jp101244t

  14. [14]

      Ma, X. Y.; Chen, Y. F.; Wang, H.; Li, Q. X.; Lin, W. F.; Cai, W. B. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 2562. doi: 10.1039/C7CC08793D

  15. [15]

      Cerritos, R. C.; Guerra-Balcázar, M.; Ramírez, R. F.; Ledesma-García, J.; Arriaga, L. G. Materials 2012, 5, 1686. doi: 10.3390/ma5091686

  16. [16]

      Ding, H.; Shi, X. Z.; Shen, C. M.; Hui, C.; Xu, Z. C.; Li, C.; Tian, Y.; Wang, D. K.; Gao, H. J. Chin. Phys. B 2010, 19, 106104. doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/19/10/106104

  17. [17]

      Roy, P. S.; Bagchi, J.; Bhattacharya, S. K. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 2302. doi: 10.1039/C2CY20264F

  18. [18]

      Xia, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Lim, B.; Skrabalak, S. E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 60. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802248

  19. [19]

      Masala, O.; Seshadri, R. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2004, 34, 41. doi: 10.1146/annurev.matsci.34.052803.090949

  20. [20]

      Niu, Z. Q.; Li, Y. D. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 72. doi: 10.1021/cm4022479

  21. [21]

      Huang, W. X; Hua, Q.; Cao, T. Catal. Lett. 2014, 144, 1355. doi: 10.1007/s10562-014-1306-5

  22. [22]

      Liu, M.; Zhang, J.; Liu, J.; William, W. Y. J. Catal. 2011, 278, 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2010.11.009

  23. [23]

      Tsunoyama, H.; Ichikuni, N.; Sakurai, H.; Tsukuda, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7086. doi: 10.1021/ja810045y

  24. [24]

      Narayanan, R.; El-Sayed, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8340. doi: 10.1021/ja035044x

  25. [25]

      Chen, K.; Wu, H. T.; Hua, Q.; Chang, S. J.; Huang, W. X. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 2273. doi: 10.1039/C2CP44571A

  26. [26]

      Pattabiraman, R. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 1997, 153, 9. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(96)00327-4

  27. [27]

      Singh, R.; Singh, A. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2009, 34, 2052. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.12.047

  28. [28]

      Noroozifar, M.; Khorasani-Motlagh, M.; Ekrami-Kakhki, M. S. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2014, 44, 233. doi: 10.1007/s10800-013-0635-1

  29. [29]

      Moulder, J. F. Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Physical Electronics Division, Perkin-Elmer Corp.: Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 1995: p. 234.

  30. [30]

      Kibis, L.; Titkov, A.; Stadnichenko, A.; Koscheev, S.; Boronin, A. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 9248. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.07.011

  31. [31]

      Russo, M.; Furlani, A.; Altamura, P.; Fratoddi, I.; Polzonetti, G. Polymer 1997, 38, 3677. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00925-1

  32. [32]

      Xue, L.; Zhang L.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, M.; Gong, M. C.; Chen, Y. Q. J. Rare. Earth. 2011, 29, 544. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0721(10)60495-4

  33. [33]

      Sohn, Y. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 1692. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.124

  34. [34]

      Moulder, J.; Stickle, W.; Sobol, P.; Bomben, K. Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; Chastain, J., Ed.; Perkin-Elmer Corp.: Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 1992.

  35. [35]

      Xian, J. Y.; Hua, Q.; Jiang, Z. Q.; Ma, Y. S.; Huang, W. X. Langmuir 2012, 28, 6736. doi: 10.1021/la300786w

  36. [36]

      An, H.; Pan, L. N.; Cui, H.; Li, B. J. Zhou, D. D.; Zhai, J. P.; Li, Q. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 102, 79. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.142

  37. [37]

      Zhang, M.; Yan, Z.; Xie, J. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 77, 237. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.05.098

  38. [38]

      Xu, C. X.; Hou, J. G.; Pang, X. H.; Li, X. J.; Zhu, M. L.; Tang, B. Y. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 10489. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.041

  39. [39]

      Umegaki, T.; Yan, J. M.; Zhang, X. B.; Shioyama, H.; Kuriyama, N.; Xu, Q. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2009, 34, 3816. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.03.003

•