锂氧电池双功能还原石墨烯-LaFeO<sub>3</sub>复合纳米催化剂的制备及性能

引用本文: 张晓茹, 许跃峰, 沈守宇, 陈媛, 黄令, 李君涛, 孙世刚. 锂氧电池双功能还原石墨烯-LaFeO₃复合纳米催化剂的制备及性能[J]. 物理化学学报, 2017, 33(11): 2237-2244. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201705231 shu

Citation: ZHANG Xiao-Ru, XU Yue-Feng, SHEN Shou-Yu, CHEN Yuan, HUANG Ling, LI Jun-Tao, SUN Shi-Gang. Reduced Graphene Oxide-LaFeO₃ Composite Nanomaterials as Bifunctional Catalyst for Rechargeable Lithium-Oxygen Batteries[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2017, 33(11): 2237-2244. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201705231 shu

锂氧电池双功能还原石墨烯-LaFeO₃复合纳米催化剂的制备及性能

张晓茹 ^1, ,
许跃峰 ^1, ,
沈守宇 ^1, ,
陈媛 ^1, ,
黄令 ^1, ,
李君涛 ^2, ,
孙世刚 ^1,

1.
固体表面物理化学国家重点实验室, 厦门大学化学化工学院化学系, 厦门 361005;
2.
厦门大学能源学院, 厦门 361005
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金（21621091）和国家重点研发计划（2016YFB0100202）资助项目

摘要: 制备具有氧还原（ORR）与氧释放（OER）双功能催化活性的特殊孔道结构电催化剂是锂氧电池研究的挑战之一。本文以氧化石墨烯、硝酸铁、硝酸镧、柠檬酸为原料，结合溶胶凝胶和水热合成方法，制备出还原氧化石墨烯（RGO）与铁酸镧（LaFeO₃）复合的双功能催化剂（RGO-LaFeO₃）。X射线衍射（XRD）、傅里叶变换红外（FTIR）光谱和Raman光谱分析结果确认该复合催化剂由纯相钙钛矿结构LaFeO₃和还原氧化石墨烯组成，扫描电子显微镜（SEM）观察到LaFeO₃纳米颗粒均匀地负载在RGO片层表面。锂氧电池测试结果指出，相对于LaFeO₃纳米粒子（NP-LaFeO₃），RGO-LaFeO₃催化剂具有更好的ORR和OER催化活性，归因于RGO特殊的三维导电多孔结构与LaFeO₃纳米粒子的协同催化作用。以RGO-LaFeO₃作为阴极催化剂的锂氧电池在限1000 mAh·g^-1比容量、100 mA·g^-1电流密度条件下，可实现36周稳定的充放电循环，展示出良好的应用前景。

关键词:

English

Reduced Graphene Oxide-LaFeO₃ Composite Nanomaterials as Bifunctional Catalyst for Rechargeable Lithium-Oxygen Batteries

1.
State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian Province, P. R. China;
2.
College of Energy, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian Province, P. R. China
Received Date: 17 February 2017
Revised Date: 15 May 2017
Fund Project:
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21621091) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB0100202).

Abstract: Development of electrocatalysts is one of the challenges in the development of the lithium-oxygen battery, especially the synthesis of catalysts with special pore structures and excellent bifunctional catalytic performance for both the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). In this article, a reduced graphene oxide-LaFeO₃ (RGO-LaFeO₃) nanocomposite electrocatalyst was synthesized by combining sol-gel and hydrothermal methods and using graphene oxide, lanthanum nitrate, ferric nitrate, and citric acid as raw materials. The prepared samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The results confirmed that the RGO-LaFeO₃ was composed of pure phase LaFeO₃ with a perovskite structure and RGO and that the LaFeO₃ nanoparticles were loaded uniformly on the RGO layer surface. In comparison with a LaFeO₃ nanoparticle (NP-LaFeO₃) catalyst, RGO-LaFeO₃ exhibited superior activity for both the ORR and the OER when it served as the cathode of a lithium-oxygen battery. The higher catalytic activity of the RGO-LaFeO₃ is attributed to the synergistic effect of the special three-dimensional electronic conductive structure of RGO and the intrinsic catalytic property of LaFeO₃. It was shown that the lithium-oxygen battery with the RGO-LaFeO₃ cathode can be cycled stably up to 36 reversible cycles under conditions of a limit discharge depth of 1000 mAh·g^-1 and a 100 mA·g^-1 current density for charge-discharge. The study illustrates that the RGO-LaFeO₃ bifunctional electrocatalyst is a promising candidate for the cathode in lithium-oxygen batteries.

Key words:

1. [1]
  (1) Bruce, P. G.; Freunberger, S. A.; Hardwick, L. J.; Tarascon, J. M. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 19. doi: 10.1038/nmat3191
2. [2]
  (2) Girishkumar, G.; McCloskey, B.; Luntz, A. C.; Swanson, S.; Wilcke, W. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2193. doi: 10.1021/jz1005384
3. [3]
  (3) Wu, S. C.; Tang, J.; Li, F. J.; Liu, X. Z.; Zhou, H. S. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 16860. doi: 10.1039/c5cc06370a
4. [4]
  (4) Wang, Z. L.; Xu, D.; Xu, J. J.; Zhang, X. B. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7746. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60248f
5. [5]
  (5) Shao, Y.; Park, S.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, J. G.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 844. doi: 10.1021/cs300036v
6. [6]
  (6) Liao, K. M.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Y. Q.; Li, F.J.; Jian, Z. L.; Yu, H. J.; Zhou, H. S. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 1429. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201403371
7. [7]
  (7) Yang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Shen, Y.; Yuan, L. X.; Huang, Y. H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2016, 32, 1062. [杨泽, 张旺, 沈越, 袁利霞, 黄云辉. 物理化学学报, 2016, 32, 1062.]doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201603231
8. [8]
  (8) Xiao, J.; Mei, D.; Li, X.; Xu, W.; Wang, D.; Graff, G. L.; Bennett, W.D.; Nie, Z.; Saraf, L. V.; Aksay, I. A.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J. G. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 5071. doi: 10.1021/nl203332e
9. [9]
  (9) Wang, Z. L.; Xu, D.; Xu, J. J.; Zhang, L. L.; Zhang, X. B. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 3699. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201200403
10. [10]
  (10) Tong, S.; Zheng, M.; Lu, Y.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, X.; He, P.; Zhou, H. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 7302. doi: 10.1039/C5CC01114K
11. [11]
  (11) Jiang, J.; He, P.; Tong, S.; Zheng, M.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, X.; Shi, Y.; Zhou, H. NPG Asia Mater. 2016, 8, e239. doi: 10.1038/am.2015.141
12. [12]
  (12) Lu, J.; Lee, Y. J.; Luo, X.; Lau, K. C.; Asadi, M.; Wang, H.H.; Brombosz, S.; Wen, J. G.; Zhai, D. Y.; Chen, Z. H.; Miller, D. J.; Jeong, Y. S.; Park, J. B.; Fang, Z. Z.; Kumar, B.; Amin, S. K.; Sun, Y. K.; Curtiss, L. A.; Amine, K. Nature 2016, 529, 377. doi: 10.1038/nature16484
13. [13]
  (13) Peng, Z.; Freunberger, S. A.; Chen, Y.; Bruce, P. G. Science 2012, 337, 563. doi: 10.1126/science.1223985
14. [14]
  (14) Leng, L. M.; Li, J.; Zeng, X. Y.; Song, H. Y.; Shu, T.; Wang, H. S. J. Power Sources 2017, 337, 173. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.10.089
15. [15]
  (15) Débart, A.; Paterson, A. J.; Bao, J.; Bruce, P. G. Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 4597. doi: 10.1002/ange.200705648
16. [16]
  (16) Oh, S. H.; Black, R.; Pomerantseva, E.; Lee, J. H.; Nazar, L. F. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 1004. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1499
17. [17]
  (17) Xu, Y. F.; Chen, Y.; Xu, G. L.; Zhang, X. R.; Chen, Z.; Li, J.T.; Huang, L.; Amine, K.; Sun, S. G. Nano Energy 2016, 28, 63. doi: org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.009
18. [18]
  (18) Thotiyl, M. M. O.; Freunberger, S. A.; Peng, Z.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Bruce, P. G. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 1050. doi: 10.1038/nmat3737
19. [19]
  (19) Liu, G.; Chen, H.; Xia, L.; Wang, S.; Ding, L. X.; Li, D.; Xiao, K.; Dai, S.; Wang, H. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 22478. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b06587
20. [20]
  (20) Xu, J. J.; Xu, D.; Wang, Z. L.; Wang, H. G.; Zhang, L. L.; Zhang, X. B. Angew. Chem. Int, Ed. 2013, 52, 3887. doi: 10.1002/anie.201210057
21. [21]
  (21) Xu, J. J.; Wang, Z. L.; Xu, D.; Meng, F. Z.; Zhang, X. B. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2213. doi: 10.1039/c3ee42934b
22. [22]
  (22) Chen, F. Y.; Xiao, L.; Yang, C. X.; Zhuang, L. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2015, 31, 2310. [陈凤英, 肖丽, 杨翠霞, 庄林. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31, 2310.]doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201510162
23. [23]
  (23) Xiao, F. X.; Miao, J.; Liu, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1559. doi: 10.1021/ja411651e
24. [24]
  (24) Dreyer, D. R.; Park, S.; Bielawski, C. W.; Ruoff, R. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 228. doi: 10.1039/b917103g
25. [25]
  (25) Wang, J. D.; Peng, T. J.; Sun, H. J.; Hou, Y. D. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2014, 30, 2077. [汪建德, 彭同江, 孙红娟, 侯云丹. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30, 2077.]doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201409152
26. [26]
  (26) Gosavi, P. V.; Biniwale, R. B. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010, 119, 324. doi: org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2009.09.005
27. [27]
  (27) Krishnamoorthy, K.; Veerapandian, M.; Yun, K.; Kim, S. J. Carbon 2013, 53, 38. doi: org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.013
28. [28]
  (28) Lu, Y. C.; Shao-Horn, Y. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 93. doi: 10.1021/jz3018368
29. [29]
  (29) Jung, H. G.; Hassoun, J.; Park, J. B.; Sun, Y. K.; Scrosati, B. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 579. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1376
30. [30]
  (30) Jung, K. N.; Lee, J. I.; Im, W. B.; Yoon, S.; Shin, K. H.; Lee, J. W. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 9406. doi: 10.1039/c2cc35302d
31. [31]
  (31) Feng, N.; He, P.; Zhou, H. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502303. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201502303
32. [32]
  (32) Aurbach, D.; McCloskey, B. D.; Nazar, L. F.; Bruces, P. G. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16128. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.128

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 2
文章访问数: 709
HTML全文浏览量: 66

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

锂氧电池双功能还原石墨烯-LaFeO₃复合纳米催化剂的制备及性能

English

Reduced Graphene Oxide-LaFeO₃ Composite Nanomaterials as Bifunctional Catalyst for Rechargeable Lithium-Oxygen Batteries

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

锂氧电池双功能还原石墨烯-LaFeO3复合纳米催化剂的制备及性能

English

Reduced Graphene Oxide-LaFeO3 Composite Nanomaterials as Bifunctional Catalyst for Rechargeable Lithium-Oxygen Batteries

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

锂氧电池双功能还原石墨烯-LaFeO₃复合纳米催化剂的制备及性能

Reduced Graphene Oxide-LaFeO₃ Composite Nanomaterials as Bifunctional Catalyst for Rechargeable Lithium-Oxygen Batteries

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs