催化学报  2015, Vol. 36 Issue (5): 721-727   PDF (513 KB)    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
李念哲
高远
张欣欣
玉占君
石雷
孙琪
Oxidation of styrene to benzaldehyde by p-toluenesulfonic acid using hydrogen peroxide in the presence of activated carbon
Nianzhe Li, Yuan Gao, Xinxin Zhang, Zhanjun Yu, Lei Shi, Qi Sun     
Institute of Chemistry for Functionalized Materials, Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, Liaoning, China
Abstract: The selective oxidation of styrene to benzaldehyde catalyzed by p-toluenesulfonic acid (p-TsOH) in the presence of activated carbon (AC) was investigated with H2O2 as the oxidant. The reaction parameters of reaction time, temperature, catalyst mass, and styrene/H2O2 molar ratios were evaluated. A strong promoting effect of AC on the p-TsOH/H2O2 system was observed. The appropriate ratio and amounts of AC and p-TsOH were an important factor. The acidity of p-TsOH does not play a significant role. p-TsOH reacted with H2O2 by a non-radical process to oxidize styrene. The function of the AC was to activate H2O2 and to help the p-TsOH/H2O2 system in styrene oxidation. The reduction of oxygen containing groups (-OH, -COOH) on AC by a high temperature treatment or introduction of -SO3H groups onto AC affected the styrene conversion. The -SO3H groups were more effective than the oxygen-containing groups on the AC in promoting styrene oxidation.
© 2014, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Styrene     Hydrogen peroxide     p-Toluenesulfonic acid     Activated carbon     Oxidation    

1. Introduction

The selective oxidation of styrene to benzaldehyde can be carried out by using atmospheric oxygen [1, 2], alkyl hydroperoxides [3, 4], or H2O2 [5, 6, 7, 8, 9] in the presence of an appropriate metal-based catalyst to activate the oxidant. The use of H2O2 to oxidize styrene produces different products, depending upon the catalyst and the reaction conditions. H2O2 combined with a catalyst can provide hydroxyl radicals (OH). OH can attack styrene by electrophilic addition to the multiple C-C bonds and aromatic rings [10, 11].

Recently, some carbon or silicasupported sulfonic acid were prepared and used as a solid acid catalyst in many reactions [12, 13, 14, 15]. Using H2O2 as an oxidant, the solid acid catalysts (supported sulfonic acid) as a metal-free catalyst selectively oxidized organic compounds. For example, Maggi et al. [12] developed silica- and polystyrene-supported sulfonic acids as a metal-free heterogeneous catalyst for the oxidation of hydroquinones to the corresponding 1,4-benzoquinones with H2O2. Yang et al. [16] investigated sulfonated carbon as a catalyst for the oxidation of aldehydes to the corresponding acids by H2O2. Sato et al. [17] reported a procedure for the synthesis of 1,2-diols by the dihydroxylation of olefins with H2O2 catalyzed by resin-supported sulfonic acid.

p-Toluenesulfonic acid (p-TsOH) as a catalyst has shown successful results in some acid-catalyzed reactions [18, 19, 20, 21]. p-TsOH contains a sulfonic acid group (-SO3H), and dissolves easily in water and is insoluble in organic reagents such as benzene, toluene, and alkanes. Thus, p-TsOH can be recycled by separating the organic phase and aqueous phase. Very recently, Rostami et al. [22] researched the selective oxidation of sulfides to sulfoxides using H2O2 catalyzed by p-TsOH under solvent-free conditions.

In order to extend the method of the selective oxidation of styrene, we evaluated the activity of p-TsOH as a metal-free catalyst for the oxidation of styrene to benzaldehyde with H2O2 as oxidant in the presence of activated carbon (AC). A strong promoting effect of AC on the p-TsOH/H2O2 system was observed. Investigating the interaction of p-TsOH and AC in the oxidation reaction will be helpful for understanding the reaction mechanism of solid acid catalysts in similar reaction systems.

2. Experimental
2.1. Chemicals

All chemicals used for the experiments were AR grade, including AC, HNO3 (65%), H2SO4 (98%), and p-TsOH. These were obtained from Tianjin Kermel Chemical Reagents Company. Styrene (AR) and H2O2 (30%) were supplied by Sinopharm Chemical Reagents Company.

2.2. AC pretreatment

Commercial AC was first boiled in deionized water for 2 h, and then washed with deionized water. The washed AC was treated with 65% HNO3 at room temperature for 24 h. After filtration, the acid-treated AC was washed thoroughly by deionized water and then dried at 105 °C overnight, and labeled as HAC. HAC was treated in a N2 or 5%H2/Ar atmosphere by heating at a rate of 10 °C/min to 800 °C, and then kept at this temperature for 6 h. The samples are denoted as HACN2 and HACH2.

In addition, HAC (1 g) was heated in 100 mL concentrated H2SO4 (98%) at 150 °C for 15 h under N2 atmosphere. The resulting carbon material was washed with hot distilled water (> 80 °C) until no sulfate ions were detected in the wash water. The resulting material was designated as HAC-SO3H. The S content of the sample was 5.5 mmol/g, which was determined by X-ray fluorescence (Siements SRS3400).

2.3. AC characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed on a Rigaku D8 Advance diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation, voltage 40 kV and current 40 mA. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded in the range of 400-4000 cm-1 on a Bruker Tensor 27 spectrometer. The total acid content of the AC was obtained using a standard acid-base titration [23]. For a typical titration experiment, an AC sample mass of 0.5 g was suspended in 25 mL standard NaOH solution (0.1 mol/L) and shaken in a closed container for 24 h. The slurry was filtered to remove AC. An aliquot of 10 mL was back-titrated with 0.1 mol/L HCl.

2.4. Styrene oxidation

The oxidation experiments were carried out in a 50-mL glass reactor with magnetic stirring immersed in a water recirculating bath and equipped with a reflux condenser. A standard run is as follows: an amount of HAC or p-TsOH, 5 mL of acetonitrile, and styrene and H2O2 in proportion were added to the reactor and stirred by a magnetic stirrer at the set temperature for a set time. After the reaction, the products were analyzed using an Agilent-6890 gas chromatograph equipped with a FID using a HP-5 capillary column (30 m x 0.32 mm x 0.25 μm) and N2 as the carrier gas. The internal standard method was adopted for the quantitative analysis of the products using toluene as an internal standard substance. The conversion of styrene (Cstyrene) and selectivity for benzaldehyde (Sbenzaldehyde) was defined as follows: Cstyrene = (n0 - nstyrene)/n0 x 100%; Sbenzaldehyde = nbenzaldehyde/(n0 - nstyrene) x 100%. n0 and nstyrene denoted the initial mole number and the final mole number.

3. Results and discussion
3.1. Reaction conditions

We used p-TsOH as the catalyst for the selective oxidation of styrene to benzaldehyde with H2O2 as an oxidant in the presence of AC. In the preliminary study without styrene, no benzaldehyde was formed using either the p-TsOH/H2O2 or the p-TsOH/HAC/H2O2 system. The reaction parameters were first optimized for the oxidation of styrene. The results are summarized in Table 1. With 0.058 mmol of p-TsOH as catalyst and 3.5 molar ratio of H2O2/styrene at 60 °C, the styrene conversion was very low, 8.7% after 5 h of reaction (Table 1, entry1). The low activity was attributable to H2O2 protonation to form an oxonium ion in the presence of p-TsOH [22, 24],

p-TsOH → H+ + p-TsO- (1)
H+ + H2O2 → H3O2+ (2)

which enhanced H2O2 stability and reduce its reactivity. When AC treated by HNO3 (HAC) was added into the p-TsOH/H2O2 system, the styrene conversion increased. For example, the styrene conversion and benzaldehyde selectivity were 35.3% and 85.4%, respectively, when 10 mg HAC was added, and they were 43.3% and 86.8%, respectively, when adding 50 mg HAC (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). The results showed that the addition of HAC into the p-TsOH/H2O2 system increased the styrene conversion.

Table 1
Oxidation of styrene to benzaldehyde with H2O2 catalyzed by HAC and p-TsOH under different conditions.

Carbon as a catalyst has been used in several processes for the oxidation of organic compounds in liquid using H2O2 as the oxidant [25, 26, 27]. When using only 10 mg HAC as catalyst, the conversion of styrene was very low, and was 3% after 5 h of reaction (Table 1, entry 4).

It is generally thought that the interaction of AC with H2O2 generates free radical species (OH/OOH) according to the following reaction, Eqs. (3) and (4) [11, 27, 28].

AC + H2O2 → AC + OH- + OH (3)
AC+ + H2O2 → AC + H+ + OOH (4)

The free radical species directly oxidize styrene to form the oxidation products.

It is important to note that when using HAC as catalyst, some O2 was formed by H2O2 decomposition in the solution of styrene, acetonitrile, H2O2, and HAC (Fig. 4). The formation of O2 was attributed to the interaction between the free radical species according to the reaction Eq. (5) [11, 12, 29].

OH + OOH → H2O + O2 (5)

Thus, the low activity over HAC implied that the reaction between the free radical species and styrene was the rate determining step. The faster reaction between the free radicals generates more O2, while part of the H2O2 was consumed.

When the amount of HAC was fixed (10 mg), and the amount of p-TsOH was increased from 0.058 to 0.29 mmol, after 5 h of reaction, the corresponding styrene conversion increased from 35.3% to 53.5% while the benzaldehyde selectivity only decreased from 85.4% to 81.5%. When simultaneously increasing the amounts of both HAC and p-TsOH to 50 mg and 0.29 mmol, respectively, a significantly promotion of styrene oxidation was observed. The styrene conversion was increased to 80.1% and the benzaldehyde selectivity was 86.5% (Table 1, entry 6). On further increasing both HAC and p-TsOH to 100 mg and 0.58 mmol, respectively, the styrene conversion increased to > 99%, and the selectivity for benzaldehyde decreased to 53.2%. These results indicated that the appropriate ratio and amount of HAC and p-TsOH were an important factor for obtaining high activity and selectivity in styrene oxidation.

For the 10 mg HAC and 0.058 mmol p-TsOH system, when increasing the reaction temperature from 40 to 80 °C, the styrene conversion increased remarkably from 13.6% to 68.2%. The benzaldehyde selectivity decreased from 87% to 71.7%, and the corresponding benzoic acid selectivity was gradually increased. Thus, increasing the reaction temperature can improve the oxidation ability of the p-TsOH/HAC/H2O2 system. At 60 °C , when increasing the molar ratios of H2O2/styrene from 2.5 to 3.5, the styrene conversion increased from 14.1% to 35.3%. With further increasing of the molar ratio to 4.5, the styrene conversion was almost unchanged (Table1, entries 2 and 13). This indicated that when the amount of catalyst and reaction temperature were fixed,excess H2O2 could not be effectively activated. Moreover, after the reaction, the HAC was filtrated, washed, dried, and used again. The styrene conversion and benzaldehyde selectivity with the HAC used/p-TsOH/H2O2 were almost equal to those of fresh HAC (Table 1, entries 13 and 14).

3.2. Effect of the surface groups of the AC

To explore the effect of the carbon surface chemistry on the oxidation reaction, the styrene oxidation was catalyzed by a high temperature treated HAC (HACH2 and HACN2) or untreated HAC, and p-TsOH. The results are shown in Fig. 1. When using 50 mg HAC as catalyst, the conversion of styrene was very low (8.5%, 10 h). Similarly, with the heat-treated HAC (50 mg) as catalyst, the conversion of styrene was still low. After 10 h of reaction, the conversion of styrene and the selectivity for benzaldehyde were 4% and 95% for HACH2 and 5% and 86% for HACN2, respectively.

Fig. 1. Oxidation of styrene to benzaldehyde using different catalysts. (a) HAC/p-TsOH; (b) HACH2/p-TsOH; (c) HACN2/p-TsOH. (1) Styrene conversion with AC; (2) Benzaldehyde selectivity with AC; (3) Styrene conversion with AC/p-TsOH; (4) Benzaldehyde selectivity with AC/p-TsOH; (5) Styrene conversion with p-TsOH; (6) Benzaldehyde selectivity with p-TsOH. Reaction conditions: AC 50 mg, p-TsOH 0.29 mmol, styrene 5 mmol, acetonitrile 5 mL, H2O2/styrene molar ratio 3.5, 60 °C, 10 h.

When using only 0.29 mmol p-TsOH as catalyst, the conversion of styrene also was very low (11%, 10 h) (Fig. 1(a)). With the simultaneous use of p-TsOH and heat-treated HAC as catalyst, compared with HAC (89% styrene conversion and 80% benzaldehyde selectivity), the conversion of styrene was further increased to 94% for HACH2 and 97% for HACN2. The corresponding selectivity for benzaldehyde decreased to 57% and 61% after 10 h of reaction, respectively. More benzoic acid was observed, implying that styrene was over-oxidized.

The three different AC (HAC, HACH2, and HACN2) were characterized to investigate the surface and structure. For HAC and heat-treated HAC, the XRD patterns exhibited similar diffraction peaks at 2θ = 10°-60°. All the three sample frameworks were amorphous (Fig. 2(a)) [30]. The FT-IR spectra of HAC and heat-treated HAC are shown in Fig. 2(b). For the HAC sample, it displayed O-H stretches (3654 cm-1), C=O stretches (1708 cm-1), C=C stretches (1594 cm-1), and C-O stretches (1000-1200 cm-1) [31, 32]. After HAC was heat-treated in H2/Ar or N2 at 800 °C, remarkable decrease of the bands at 3654 and 1000-1200 cm-1 were observed. The results indicated that the oxygen-containing groups on the carbon surface were decreased by the high temperature treatment of HAC, in agreement with literature reports [29, 33]. The total acidity of the AC was obtained using a standard acid-base back titration [23]. The total acidity were 0.239 mmol/g for HAC, 0.087 mmol/g for HACH2, and 0.099 mmol/g for HACN2. The decrease in the total acidity was attributed to the reduction of the oxygen-containing groups by the high temperature treatment of AC, which was consistent with the FT-IR results. The decrease in the amount of the oxygen-containing groups was very beneficial for the decomposition of H2O2 [29, 33] and more OH radicals were formed, which in turn increased the styrene conversion, and reduced the corresponding selectivity for benzaldehyde for the HACH2 or HACN2 and p-TsOH systems.

Fig. 2. XRD patterns (a) and FT-IR spectra (b) of HAC (1), HACH2 (2), and HACN2 (3).

The OH formed in the H2O2 system can be probed using a method described previously [34]. It is known that OH reacts with terephthalic acid (TA) in basic solution to generate TAOH, which emits a unique fluorescence signal with its peak centered at 427 nm. Figure 3 shows the comparison of the fluorescence intensity for different samples illumined for a fixed time (30 min) with pure H2O2 as the reference. It was obvious that the fluorescence intensity was proportional to the amount of produced hydroxyl radicals. The amount of OH produced on the heat-treated HAC was more than that of the OH produced on HAC. This also agreed with their catalytic activities for H2O2 decomposition and styrene conversion. For the p-TsOH and HACH2 system, the formation of OH was inhibited, suggesting that the mechanism of H2O2 decomposition was changed in the presence of p-TsOH.

Fig. 3. Fluorescence spectra of TAOH formed by the reaction of TA with OH radicals generated by different samples under visible light irradiation for 30 min.

There were oxygen-containing groups (such as -OH, -COOH) on the surface of HAC and the -SO3H groups of p-TsOH in the p-TsOH/HAC system. To determine which of the oxygen-containing groups or -SO3H plays a leading role,HAC was heated in concentrated H2SO4 to introduce sulfate acid groups (-SO3H) [15]. This was labeled HAC-SO3H. After the sulfonation treatment of HAC, hydrophilic groups (-SO3H, -COOH, -OH) coexist on the surface of the HAC-SO3H sample [35]. With HAC-SO3H as the catalyst, the conversion of styrene and selectivity for benzaldehyde were 64.8% and 80.6%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those when using only HAC as the catalyst under the same reaction conditions. This showed that the SO3H group was much more effectively than the oxygen-containing groups for promoting the oxidation of styrene using H2O2 as oxidant.

3.3. Amount of H2O2 in the p-TsOH/HAC system

Both styrene oxidation and H2O2 decomposition proceed simultaneously in styrene oxidation process and the contribution to the gas volume was measured in the reaction solution. Figure 4 demonstrates the kinetic oxygen evolution curves with different H2O2 systems. When styrene, acetonitrile, and H2O2 were mixed and stirred at 60 °C, a small amount of oxygen evolution was observed, which was attributed to H2O2 decomposition by the heating and stirring of the solution. An hour later, the reaction achieved equilibrium. When 0.29 mmol of p-TsOH was added into the above mixture, no further decomposition of H2O2 was observed. Some O2 was produced by adding 50 mg HAC into the mixture of styrene, acetonitrile, and H2O2. AC acts as an initiator for the decomposition of H2O2, yielding free radical species such as OH in solution [11, 12, 29, 33]. These results are in agreement with the fluorescence results. Given the poor catalytic activity observed when using only HAC as catalyst, the free radicals from the HAC reaction with H2O2 cannot effectively oxidize styrene. When 50 mg of HAC and 0.29 mmol p-TsOH were simultaneously added into the mixture of styrene, acetonitrile, and H2O2, compared to the addition of only 50 mg of HAC, the amount of O2 evolved slightly decreased, but was higher than that using only 0.29 mmol p-TsOH. Combining with the data of styrene oxidation, the free radicals species formed by HAC was more conducive to the styrene oxidation through promoting the p-TsOH/H2O2 system.

Fig. 4. Kinetics curves of O2 produced by the decomposition of H2O2 in the different reaction systems. (1) Mixture of acetonitrile, styrene, and H 2O2; (2) Acetonitrile, styrene, p-TsOH, and H2O2; (3) Acetonitrile, styrene, p-TsOH, HAC, and H2O2; (4) Acetonitrile, styrene, HAC, and H2O2. Reaction conditions: HAC 50 mg, p-TsOH 0.29 mmol, styrene 5 mmol, acetonitrile 5 mL, molar ratio of H2O2/styrene 3.5, 60 °C.

For the system of 50 mg HAC and 0.29 mmol p-TsOH, the amount of H2O2 decomposition calculated by the volume of generated O2 and the amount of residual H2O2 measured by the iodometric method after reaction are shown in Table 2. The amount of H2O2 decomposition in the p-TsOH/HAC system was less than that of the with only HAC system. This may be due to the presence of p-TsOH, which acidified the reaction mixture and partially inhibited the decomposition of H2O2. The amount of residual H2O2 in the p-TsOH/HAC system also was less than that in the HAC system. Therefore, more H2O2 participated in the oxidation of styrene in the p-TsOH/HAC/H2O2 system.

Table 2
Amounts of H2O2 in different catalyst systems.

Compared with HAC and heat-treated HAC, the latter showed better activity for the decomposition of H2O2 (Table 2). The amounts of H2O2 decomposition increased in the following order: HACH2 > HACN2 > HAC. The better decomposition of H2O2 was attributed to the presence of a higher amount of basic surface groups (formed by the high temperature treatment of AC) that can interact with H2O2 to donate one electron, which resulted in the formation of OH and further formation of O2 [11, 12, 24]. The increased OH formed by the heat-treated HAC facilitated styrene conversion, but decreased the selectivity for benzaldehyde with reaction time.

3.4. Effect of acidity and free radical scavenger

Reaction mechanisms in the liquid phase are generally more complex, and may involve a combination of homogeneous and heterogeneous reaction steps. On the basis of previously reported mechanisms on the catalytic application of acids in the oxidation of organic compounds using H2O2 [17, 36, 37, 38], one explanation is that p-TsOH acts as a protic acid, which polarizes the O-O bond in H2O2 through hydrogen bonding to produce the reactive oxygen transfer agent. Another possible explanation is the in situ formation of peroxysulfonic acid by the reaction of p-TsOH with H2O2, followed by oxygen transfer to the organic compound.

To clarify the effect of the acidity of p-TsOH on the p-TsOH/HAC system, when using the same molar amounts of HCl or H2SO4 to replace p-TsOH, the styrene conversion and selectivity for benzaldehyde were 6% and 89% for HCl, and 9% and 90% for H2SO4, respectively. This suggested that the acidity of the p-TsOH/HAC system was not an important factor for the oxidation of styrene.

Tertiary butanol, a free radical scavenger, was added into the reactant. With only p-TsOH as the catalyst, styrene oxidation gave: in the absence of tertiary butanol, 11% styrene conversion and 82% selectivity for benzaldehyde, and in the presence of tertiary butanol, 13% styrene conversion and 87% selectivity for benzaldehyde. The oxidation of styrene was not affected by the radical scavenger, implying that the reaction is a non-radical process. Thus, styrene oxidation with only p-TsOH is possible due to the in situ formation of peroxysulfonic acid as a powerful oxidizing reagent [12, 16], which reacts with styrene to give the intermediate epoxystyrene. Finally, the oxidation of epoxystyrene yields benzaldehyde.

With both p-TsOH and HAC as catalyst, the oxidation reaction gave: in the absence of tertiary butanol, 52% styrene conversion and 75% selectivity for benzaldehyde,and in the presence of tertiary butanol, 43% styrene conversion and 72% selectivity for benzaldehyde. The oxidation of styrene was slightly influenced by the radical scavenger. This implied that the addition of HAC into the p-TsOH /H2O2 system promoted the formation of peroxysulfonic acid and accelerated the oxidation of epoxystyrene to benzaldehyde (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1. Oxidation of styrene in the p-TsOH/HAC/H2O2 system.
4. Conclusions

Either p-TsOH with -SO3H groups or HAC with large amounts of oxygen-containing groups can activate H2O2 to oxidize styrene to benzaldehyde. The -SO3H groups were more effective than the oxygen-containing groups. However, both these two samples showed very low activity for styrene oxidation. There was a strong promotion effect by HAC on the p-TsOH/H2O2 system. With the simultaneous use of p-TsOH and HAC, the styrene conversion increased to eight times higher than that using either p-TsOH or HAC, while the selectivity for benzaldehyde only showed a modest decrease. The promotion mechanism of HAC to the p-TsOH/H2O2 system was attributed to the interaction of the radical reaction (HAC/H2O2) and non-radical process (p-TsOH/H2O2).

References
[1] Thao N T, Trung H H. Catal Commun, 2014, 45: 153
[2] Dhakshinamoorthy A, Primo A, Concepcion P, Alvaro M, Garcia H. Chem Eur J, 2013, 19: 7547
[3] Nemanashi M, Meijboom R. Catal Lett, 2013, 143: 324
[4] Sharma S, Sinha S, Chand S. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2012, 51: 8806
[5] Adam F, Iqbal A. Chem Eng J, 2010, 160: 742
[6] Patel A, Patel K. Inorg Chim Acta, 2014, 419: 130
[7] Tong J H, Cai X D, Wang H Y, Zhang Q P. Mater Res Bull, 2014, 55: 205
[8] Jury F A, Polaert I, Pierella L B, Estel L. Catal Commun, 2014, 46: 6
[9] Zhuang J Q, Ma D, Yan Z M, Liu X M, Han X W, Bao X H, Zhang Y H, Guo X W, Wang X S. Appl Catal A, 2004, 258: 1
[10] Saux C, Pierella L B. Appl Catal A, 2011, 400: 117
[11] Navalon S, Dhakshinamoorthy A, Alvaro M, Garcia H. ChemSusChem, 2011, 4: 1712
[12] Maggi R, Piscopo C G, Sartori G, Storaro L, Moretti E. Appl Catal A, 2012, 411-412: 146
[13] Zhang B H, Ren J W, Liu X H, Guo Y, Guo Y L, Lu G Z, Wang Y Q. Catal Commun, 2010, 11: 629
[14] Saikia L, Satyartthi J K, Srinivas D, Ratnasamy P. J Catal, 2007, 252: 148
[15] Mo X H, López D E, Suwannakarn K, Liu Y J, Lotero E, Goodwin J G Jr, Lu C Q. J Catal, 2008, 254: 332
[16] Zhou L P, Dong B B, Tang S, Ma H, Chen C, Yang X M, Xu J. J Energy Chem, 2013, 22: 659
[17] Usui Y, Sato K, Tanaka M. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2003, 42: 5623
[18] de Jong M C, Feijt R, Zondervan E, Nijhuis T A, de Haan A B. Appl Catal A, 2009, 365: 141
[19] Mun S P, Jang J P. J Ind Eng Chem, 2009, 15: 743
[20] Hassanabadi A. J Chem Res, 2013, 37: 152
[21] Anuradha V, Srinivas P V, Aparna P, Rao J M. Tetrahedron Lett, 2006, 47: 4933
[22] Rostami A, Hassanina F, Ghorbani-Choghamarani A, Saadati S. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Related Elements, 2013, 188: 833
[23] Boehm H P. Carbon, 1994, 32: 759
[24] Ramirez J H, Costa C A, Madeira L M, Mata G, Vicente M A, Rojas-Cervantes M L, López-Peinado A J, Martín-Aranda R M. Appl Catal B, 2007, 71: 44
[25] Oliveira L C A, Sillva C N, Yoshida M I, Lago R M. Carbon, 2004, 42: 2279
[26] Santos V P, Pereira M F R, Faria P C C, Órfão J J M. J Hazard Mater, 2009, 162: 736
[27] Lücking F, Köser H, Jank M, Ritter A. Water Res, 1998, 32: 2607
[28] Georgi A, Kopinke F D. Appl Catal B, 2005, 58: 9
[29] Rey A, Zazo J A, Casas J A, Bahamonde A, Rodriguez J J. Appl Catal A, 2011, 402: 146
[30] Dandekar A, Baker R T K, Vannice M A. Carbon, 1998, 36: 1821
[31] Shin S, Jang J, Yoon S H, Mochida I. Carbon, 1997, 35: 1739
[32] Figueiredo J L, Pereira M F R, Freitas M M A, Órfão J J M. Carbon, 1999, 37: 1379
[33] Khalil L B, Girgis B S, Tawfik T A M. J Chem Technol Biotechnol, 2001,76: 1132
[34] Ishibashi K, Fujishima A, Watanabe T, Hashimoto K. Elecochem Commun, 2000, 2: 207
[35] Chang B B, Fu J, Tian Y L, Dong X P. J Phys Chem C, 2013, 117: 6252
[36] van Vliet M C A, Arends I W C E, Sheldon R A. Synlett, 2001, 2: 248
[37] Wahlen J, De Vos D E, Jacobs P A. Org Lett, 2003, 5: 1777
[38] Shaabani A, Rezayan A H. Catal Commun, 2007, 8: 1112
对甲苯磺酸/活性炭/双氧水体系选择氧化苯乙烯生成苯甲醛
李念哲, 高远, 张欣欣, 玉占君, 石雷, 孙琪     
辽宁师范大学化学化工学院功能材料化学研究所, 辽宁大连116029
摘要:以双氧水为氧化剂, 研究了对甲苯磺酸和活性炭体系选择氧化苯乙烯生成苯甲醛反应性能。考察了反应时间、温度、催化剂用量、苯乙烯和双氧水摩尔比等对苯乙烯选择氧化性能的影响. 结果表明, 对甲苯磺酸和活性炭的用量和用量比是一个重要因素, 但对甲苯磺酸的酸性对氧化反应活性影响不大. 对甲苯磺酸和双氧水相互作用, 经非自由基过程氧化苯乙烯. 通过分解双氧水产生氢氧自由基, 活性炭显著提高对甲苯磺酸和双氧水体系氧化苯乙烯活性. 在惰性或还原气氛中高温处理活性炭能降低其表面含氧基团数量, 增加碱性, 有效分解双氧水, 产生相对较多的OH自由基. 与未处理的活性炭相比, 高温处理的活性炭进一步提高了对甲苯磺酸和双氧水体系氧化苯乙烯活性, 但降低了苯甲醛选择性. 经磺化, 在活性炭表面引入的-SO3H基团比含氧基团(-OH, -COOH)更有效与双氧水作用氧化苯乙烯.
关键词苯乙烯     双氧水     对甲苯磺酸     活性炭     氧化