过渡金属掺杂铈中晶格氧的活化

引用本文: Ya-Qiong Su, Long Zhang, Valery Muravev, Emiel J. M. Hensen. 过渡金属掺杂铈中晶格氧的活化[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(6): 977-984. doi: S1872-2067(19)63468-6 shu

Citation: Ya-Qiong Su, Long Zhang, Valery Muravev, Emiel J. M. Hensen. Lattice oxygen activation in transition metal doped ceria[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2020, 41(6): 977-984. doi: S1872-2067(19)63468-6 shu

过渡金属掺杂铈中晶格氧的活化

埃因霍温理工大学, 舒伊特催化研究所, 无机材料与催化实验室, P. O. Box 513, 5600 MB埃因霍温, 荷兰
基金项目:
This work was supported by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) through a Vici grant and Nuffic funding. Access to supercomputing facilities was made possible by NWO. This work has also received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant No. 686086 (Partial-PGMs).

摘要: 采用密度泛函理论计算研究了在铈表面掺杂的过渡金属（TM）离子对表面晶格氧原子活化的影响.为此，测定了经TM离子修饰的CeO₂最稳定（111）表面终端的结构和稳定性.除了保持八面体氧配位的锆和铂掺杂剂外，TM掺杂剂在取代表面Ce离子时更倾向于正方形平面配位.除了Pt（1.14eV）和Zr（正方形平面配位不稳定）外，所有TM掺杂剂的表面结构从八面体到正方形平面都很容易.通常，四价TM阳离子的离子半径比Ce⁴⁺的小得多，从而导致了显著的拉伸应变晶格，并解释了氧空位形成能量的降低.除Zr外，当产生一个氧空位时，优先形成正方形平面结构.热力学分析表明，TM掺杂CeO₂表面在典型环境催化条件下存在氧缺陷.一个具有实际意义的例子是锆掺杂CeO₂（111）中的晶格氧容易活化，从而有利于CO氧化.研究结果强调了晶格氧活化的本质和TM掺杂剂在TM-铈固溶催化剂中的优选位置.

关键词:

English

Lattice oxygen activation in transition metal doped ceria

Laboratory of Inorganic Materials & Catalysis, Schuit Institute of Catalysis, Eindhoven University of Technology, P. O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Received Date: 28 June 2019
Revised Date: 22 July 2019
Fund Project:
This work was supported by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) through a Vici grant and Nuffic funding. Access to supercomputing facilities was made possible by NWO. This work has also received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant No. 686086 (Partial-PGMs).

Abstract: Density functional theory calculations were carried out to investigate the influence of doping transition metal (TM) ions into the ceria surface on the activation of surface lattice oxygen atoms. For this purpose, the structure and stability of the most stable (111) surface termination of CeO₂ modified by TM ions was determined. Except for Zr and Pt dopants that preserve octahedral oxygen coordination, the TM dopants prefer a square-planar coordination when substituting the surface Ce ions. The surface construction from octahedral to square-planar is facile for all TM dopants, except for Pt (1.14 eV) and Zr (square-planar coordination unstable). Typically, the ionic radius of tetravalent TM cations is much smaller than that of Ce⁴⁺, resulting a significant tensile-strained lattice and explaining the lowered oxygen vacancy formation energy. Except for Zr, the square-planar structure is the preferred one when one oxygen vacancy is created. Thermodynamic analysis shows that TM-doped CeO₂ surfaces contain oxygen defects under typical conditions of environmental catalysis. A case of practical importance is the facile lattice oxygen activation in Zr-doped CeO₂(111), which benefits CO oxidation. The findings emphasize the origin of lattice oxygen activation and the preferred location of TM dopants in TM-ceria solid solution catalysts.

Key words:

Lattice oxygen activation
/ TM-doped CeO₂(111)
/ Density functional theory calculations
/ Oxygen vacancy
/ Square-planar coordination
/ Coordination transformation
/ CO oxidation

1. [1] C. Sun, H. Li, L. Chen, Energ. Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 8475-8505.
2. [2] Q. Fu, H. Saltsburg, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, Science, 2003, 301, 935-938.
3. [3] J. Graciani, K. Mudiyanselage, F. Xu, A. E. Baber, J. Evans, S. D. Senanayake, D. J. Stacchiola, P. Liu, J. Hrbek, J. F. Sanz, Science, 2014, 345, 546-550.
4. [4] S. Li, N. Wang, Y. Yue, G. Wang, Z. Zu, Y. Zhang, Chem. Sci., 2015, 6, 2495-2500.
5. [5] Y. Q. Su, J. X. Liu, I. A. W. Filot, L. Zhang, E. J. M. Hensen, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 6552-6559.
6. [6] J. Jones, H. Xiong, A. T. DeLaRiva, E. J. Peterson, H. Pham, S. R. Challa, G. Qi, S. Oh, M. H. Wiebenga, X. I. P. Hernández, Science, 2016, 353, 150-154.
7. [7] L. Liu, A. Corma, Chem. Rev., 2018, 118, 4981-5079.
8. [8] M. Nesselberger, M. Roefzaad, R. F. Hamou, P. U. Biedermann, F. F. Schweinberger, S. Kunz, K. Schloegl, G. K. Wiberg, S. Ashton, U. Heiz, Nature Mater., 2013, 12, 919-924.
9. [9] M. Turner, V. B. Golovko, O. P. Vaughan, P. Abdulkin, A. Berenguer-Murcia, M. S. Tikhov, B. F. Johnson, R. M. Lambert, Nature, 2008, 454, 981-983.
10. [10] A. Wang, J. Li, T. Zhang, Nature Rev. Chem., 2018, 2, 65-81.
11. [11] F. Dvořák, M. F. Camellone, A. Tovt, N. D. Tran, F. R. Negreiros, M. Vorokhta, T. Skála, I. Matolínová, J. Mysliveček, V. Matolín, Nature Comm., 2016, 7, 10801.
12. [12] X. F. Yang, A. Wang, B. Qiao, J. Li, J. Liu, T. Zhang, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 1740-1748.
13. [13] H. Grützmacher, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 1814-1818.
14. [14] J. L. Boyer, J. Rochford, M. K. Tsai, J. T. Muckerman, E. Fujita, Coordin. Chem. Rev., 2010, 254, 309-330.
15. [15] Y. Q. Su, J. X. Liu, I. A. W. Filot, E. J. M. Hensen, Chem. Mater., 2017, 29, 9456-9462.
16. [16] F. R. Negreiros, S. Fabris, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 21014-21020.
17. [17] T. W. Hansen, A. T. DeLaRiva, S. R. Challa, A. K. Datye, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 1720-1730.
18. [18] M. Cargnello, J. D. Jaén, J. H. Garrido, K. Bakhmutsky, T. Montini, J. C. Gámez, R. Gorte, P. Fornasiero, Science, 2012, 337, 713-717.
19. [19] A. Bruix, J. A. Rodriguez, P. J. Ramírez, S. D. Senanayake, J. Evans, J. B. Park, D. Stacchiola, P. Liu, J. Hrbek, F. Illas, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 8968-8974.
20. [20] L. Zhou, X. Li, Z. Yao, Z. Chen, M. Hong, R. Zhu, Y. Liang, J. Zhao, Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, 23900.
21. [21] Z. Hu, B. Li, X. Sun, H. Metiu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 3065-3074.
22. [22] W. Tang, Z. Hu, M. Wang, G. D. Stucky, H. Metiu, E. W. McFarland, J. Catal., 2010, 273, 125-137.
23. [23] A. D. Mayernick, M. J. Janik, J. Catal., 2011, 278, 16-25.
24. [24] A. D. Mayernick, M. J. Janik, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 14955-14964.
25. [25] W. C. Ding, X. K. Gu, H. Y. Su, W. X. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 12216-12223.
26. [26] Y. Tang, Y. G. Wang, J. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121, 11281-11289.
27. [27] Y. Q. Su, I. A. W. Filot, J. X. Liu, E. J. M. Hensen, ACS Catal., 2017, 8, 75-80.
28. [28] Y. Madier, C. Descorme, A. Le Govic, D. Duprez, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1999, 103, 10999-11006.
29. [29] J. Liu, B. Liu, Y. Fang, Z. Zhao, Y. Wei, X. Q. Gong, C. Xu, A. Duan, G. Jiang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 48, 12403-12410.
30. [30] G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B, 1994, 49, 14251.
31. [31] P. E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B, 1994, 50, 17953.
32. [32] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77, 3865.
33. [33] S. Dudarev, G. Botton, S. Savrasov, C. Humphreys, A. Sutton, Phys. Rev. B, 1998, 57, 1505.
34. [34] S. Fabris, S. de Gironcoli, S. Baroni, G. Vicario, G. Balducci, Phys. Rev. B, 2005, 72, 237102.
35. [35] M. Cococcioni, S. De Gironcoli, Phys. Rev. B, 2005, 71, 035105.
36. [36] C. Castleton, J. Kullgren, K. Hermansson, J. Chem. Phys., 2007, 127, 244704-244704.
37. [37] J. L. Da Silva, M. V. Ganduglia-Pirovano, J. Sauer, V. Bayer, G. Kresse, Phys. Rev. B, 2007, 75, 045121.
38. [38] G. Henkelman, H. Jónsson, J. Chem. Phys., 2000, 113, 9978-9985.
39. [39] D. Sheppard, R. Terrell, G. Henkelman, J. Chem. Phys., 2008, 128, 134106.
40. [40] K. Reuter, M. Scheffler, Phys. Rev. B, 2003, 68, 045407.
41. [41] D. R. Stull, H. Prophet, JANAF thermochemical tables, National Standard Reference Data System, 1971.
42. [42] L. Nie, D. H. Mei, H. F. Xiong, B. Peng, Z. Ren, X. I. P. Hernandez, A. DeLaRiva, M. Wang, M. H. Engelhard, L. Kovarik, Science, 2017, 358, 1419-1423.
43. [43] Y. Q. Su, Y. Wang, J. X. Liu, I. A. W. Filot, K. Alexopoulos, L. Zhang, V. Muravev, B. Zijlstra, D. G. Vlachos, E. J. M. Hensen, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 3289-3297.
44. [44] E. Slavinskaya, A. Stadnichenko, V. Muravyov, T. Y. Kardash, E. Derevyannikova, V. Zaikovskii, O. Stonkus, I. Lapin, V. Svetlichnyi, A. Boronin, ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 2232-2247.
45. [45] T. Y. Kardash, E. A. Derevyannikova, E. M. Slavinskaya, A. I. Stadnichenko, V. A. Maltsev, A. V. Zaikovskii, S. A. Novopashin, A. I. Boronin, K. M. Neyman, Front. Chem., 2019, 7, 114.
46. [46] A. I. Stadnichenko, V. V. Muravev, S. V. Koscheev, V. I. Zaikovskii, H. A. Aleksandrov, K. M. Neyman, A. I. Boronin, Surf. Sci., 2019, 679, 273-283.
47. [47] Y. Huang, B. Zhao, X. Hu, S. Lin, R. Ang, W. Song, Y. Sun, Dalton T., 2012, 41, 11176-11186.
48. [48] L. Zhang, T. Yabu, I. Taniguchi, Mater. Res. Bull., 2009, 44, 707-713.
49. [49] M. H. N. Assadi, Y. Shigeta, RSC Adv., 2018, 8, 13842-13849.
50. [50] S. Nakashima, K. Sugioka, K. Midorikawa, K. Mukai, J. Laser Micro. Nanoen., 2014, 9, 132-136.
51. [51] R. Vuilleumier, M. Sprik, J. Chem. Phys., 2001, 115, 3454-3468.
52. [52] P. Robkhob, T. S. Herng, J. Ding, I. Tang, S. Thongmee, J. Nanosci. Nanotechno., 2017, 17, 5631-5636.
53. [53] Y. X. Hu, S. Y. Wu, X. F. Wang, L. L. Li, Defect and Diffusion Forum, Trans Tech Publ, 2009, 71-76.
54. [54] Y. Q. Su, I. A. W. Filot, J. X. Liu, I. Tranca, E. J. M. Hensen, Chem. Mater., 2016, 28, 5652-5658.
55. [55] E. V. Matus, L. B. Okhlopkova, O. B. Sukhova, I. Z. Ismagilov, M. A. Kerzhentsev, Z. R. Ismagilov, J. Nanopart. Res., 2019, 21, 11.
56. [56] O. Laguna, F. R. Sarria, M. Centeno, J. A. Odriozola, J. Catal., 2010, 276, 360-370.
57. [57] H. Xiong, S. Lin, J. Goetze, P. Pletcher, H. Guo, L. Kovarik, K. Artyushkova, B. M. Weckhuysen, A. K. Datye, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 8986-8991.
58. [58] S. Hinokuma, H. Fujii, M. Okamoto, K. Ikeue, M. Machida, Chem. Mater., 2010, 22, 6183-6190.
59. [59] J. S. Elias, N. Artrith, M. Bugnet, L. Giordano, G. A. Botton, A. M. Kolpak, Y. Shao-Horn, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 1675-1679.
60. [60] L. Qin, Y. Q. Cui, T. L. Deng, F. H. Wei, X. F. Zhang, ChemPhysChem, 2018, 19, 3346-3349.
61. [61] W. W. Wang, P. P. Du, S. H. Zou, H. Y. He, R. X. Wang, Z. Jin, S. Shi, Y. Y. Huang, R. Si, Q. S. Song, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 2088-2099.
62. [62] J. S. Elias, M. Risch, L. Giordano, A. N. Mansour, Y. Shao-Horn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 17193-17200.
63. [63] L. W. Guo, P. P. Du, X. P. Fu, C. Ma, J. Zeng, R. Si, Y. Y. Huang, C. J. Jia, Y. W. Zhang, C. H. Yan, Nature Comm., 2016, 7, 13481.
64. [64] C. Kalamaras, D. Dionysiou, A. Efstathiou, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 2729-2742.
65. [65] X. Yao, J. Cao, L. Chen, K. Kang, Y. Chen, M. Tian, F. Yang, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 733-743.
66. [66] M. R. Benjaram, G. Thrimurthulu, L. Katta, Chin. J. Catal., 2011, 32, 800-806.
67. [67] A. Corma, P. Atienzar, H. Garcia, J. Y. Chane-Ching, Nature Mater., 2004, 3, 394.
68. [68] Y. Hao, C. K. Yang, S. M. Haile, Chem. Mater., 2014, 26, 6073-6082.

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 28
文章访问数: 1098
HTML全文浏览量: 158

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

过渡金属掺杂铈中晶格氧的活化

English

Lattice oxygen activation in transition metal doped ceria

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

过渡金属掺杂铈中晶格氧的活化

English

Lattice oxygen activation in transition metal doped ceria

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs