铈基模型催化剂的纳米结构:有序CeO<sub>2</sub>(111)薄膜上的Pt-Co纳米颗粒

引用本文: Yaroslava Lykhach, Tomáš Skála, Armin Neitzel, Nataliya Tsud, Klára Beranová, Kevin C. Prince, Vladimír Matolín, Jörg Libuda. 铈基模型催化剂的纳米结构:有序CeO₂(111)薄膜上的Pt-Co纳米颗粒[J]. 催化学报, 2020, 41(6): 985-997. doi: S1872-2067(19)63462-5 shu

Citation: Yaroslava Lykhach, Tomáš Skála, Armin Neitzel, Nataliya Tsud, Klára Beranová, Kevin C. Prince, Vladimír Matolín, Jörg Libuda. Nanoscale architecture of ceria-based model catalysts: Pt-Co nanostructures on well-ordered CeO₂(111) thin films[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2020, 41(6): 985-997. doi: S1872-2067(19)63462-5 shu

铈基模型催化剂的纳米结构:有序CeO₂(111)薄膜上的Pt-Co纳米颗粒

a 弗里德里希-亚历山大埃尔朗根-纽伦堡大学, 埃尔朗根催化资源中心界面研究与催化, 91058埃尔朗根, 德国;
b 查尔斯大学数学与物理学院表面与等离子体科学系, 18000布拉格, 捷克共和国;
c Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste SCpA, StradaStatale 14, km 163. 5, 34149巴索维扎-的里雅斯特, 意大利

摘要: 制备并表征了原子分散的模型体系：氧化铈负载的Pt-Co核壳催化剂.采用超高真空物理气相沉积法制备了有序CeO₂（111）膜上的Pt@Co和Co@Pt核壳纳米结构，并用同步辐射光电子能谱和共振光发射光谱对其进行了研究.在低Co覆盖率（0.5ML）下Co在CeO₂（111）上沉积生成Co-CeO₂（111）固溶体，然后在更高Co覆盖率下生长为金属Co纳米粒子.Pt@Co和Co@Pt两种模型结构在300-500K温度范围内都能稳定地抗烧结.在500K退火后，Pt@Co纳米结构含有接近纯的钴壳，而Co@Pt中的铂壳部分被金属钴覆盖.在550K以上，在Pt@Co和Co@Pt纳米结构中近表面区域的重新排序中产生了次表层的Pt Co合金和富铂外壳.对于Co@Pt纳米粒子，近表面区域的化学有序性取决于沉积铂壳的初始厚度.无论初始铂壳的厚度如何，在有氧存在下对Co@Pt纳米结构进行退火，都会导致Pt-Co合金的分解以及Co的氧化.Co的逐步氧化与吸附质诱导的Co偏析共同导致在负载的Co@Pt纳米结构表面形成厚的CoO层.这一过程伴随着CeO₂（111）薄膜的裂解，以及在550 K以上氧气中退火后CeO₂包裹氧化的Co@Pt纳米结构.很明显，于不同温度下在氧气和氢气的氧化-还原循环过程中，无论铂的初始厚度是多少，负载的Co@Pt纳米颗粒的结构和化学成分的变化主要是由氧化所致，而还原处理的影响则很小.

关键词:

English

Nanoscale architecture of ceria-based model catalysts: Pt-Co nanostructures on well-ordered CeO₂(111) thin films

a Interface Research and Catalysis, Erlangen Catalysis Resource Center, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstrasse 3, 91058 Erlangen, Germany;
b Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Department of Surface and Plasma Science, V Holešovičkách 2, 18000 Prague, Czech Republic;
c Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste SCpA, Strada Statale 14, km 163. 5, 34149 Basovizza-Trieste, Italy
Received Date: 03 July 2019
Revised Date: 12 August 2019

Abstract: We have prepared and characterized atomically well-defined model systems for ceria-supported Pt-Co core-shell catalysts. Pt@Co and Co@Pt core-shell nanostructures were grown on well-ordered CeO₂(111) films on Cu(111) by physical vapour deposition of Pt and Co metals in ultrahigh vacuum and investigated by means of synchrotron radiation photoelectron spectroscopy and resonant photoemission spectroscopy. The deposition of Co onto CeO₂(111) yields Co-CeO₂(111) solid solution at low Co coverage (0.5 ML), followed by the growth of metallic Co nanoparticles at higher Co coverages. Both Pt@Co and Co@Pt model structures are stable against sintering in the temperature range between 300 and 500 K. After annealing at 500 K, the Pt@Co nanostructure contains nearly pure Co-shell while the Pt-shell in the Co@Pt is partially covered by metallic Co. Above 550 K, the re-ordering in the near surface regions yields a subsurface Pt-Co alloy and Pt-rich shells in both Pt@Co and Co@Pt nanostructures. In the case of Co@Pt nanoparticles, the chemical ordering in the near surface region depends on the initial thickness of the deposited Pt-shell. Annealing of the Co@Pt nanostructures in the presence of O₂ triggers the decomposition of Pt-Co alloy along with the oxidation of Co, regardless of the thickness of the initial Pt-shell. Progressive oxidation of Co coupled with adsorbate-induced Co segregation leads to the formation of thick CoO layers on the surfaces of the supported Co@Pt nanostructures. This process is accompanied by the disintegration of the CeO₂(111) film and encapsulation of oxidized Co@Pt nanostructures by CeO₂ upon annealing in O₂ above 550 K. Notably, during oxidation and reduction cycles with O₂ and H₂ at different temperatures, the changes in the structure and chemical composition of supported Co@Pt nanostructures were driven mainly by oxidation while reduction treatments had little effect regardless of the initial thickness of the Pt-shell.

Key words:

1. [1] A. de Frank Bruijn, G. J. M. Janssen, in:T. E. Lipman, A. Z. Weber Eds., Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Production:A Volume in the Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology, Second Edition, Springer New York, New York, NY, 2019, pp. 195-234.
2. [2] L. Chong, J. Wen, J. Kubal, F. G. Sen, J. Zou, J. Greeley, M. Chan, H. Barkholtz, W. Ding, D.-J. Liu, Science, 2018, 362, 1276-1281.
3. [3] M. K. Debe, Nature, 2012, 486, 43-51.
4. [4] Y. Lykhach, A. Bruix, S. Fabris, V. Potin, I. Matolinova, V. Matolin, J. Libuda, K. M. Neyman, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2017, 7, 4315-4345.
5. [5] D. Wang, H. L. Xin, R. Hovden, H. Wang, Y. Yu, D. A. Muller, F. J. DiSalvo, H. D. Abruña, Nat. Mater., 2013, 12, 81-87.
6. [6] Y. Xiong, L. Xiao, Y. Yang, F. J. DiSalvo, H. D. Abruña, Chem. Mater., 2018, 30, 1532-1539.
7. [7] M. Oezaslan, F. Hasché, P. Strasser, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2013, 4, 3273-3291.
8. [8] L. Wang, W. Gao, Z. Liu, Z. Zeng, Y. Liu, M. Giroux, M. Chi, G. Wang, J. Greeley, X. Pan, C. Wang, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 35-42.
9. [9] Q. Jia, W. Liang, M. K. Bates, P. Mani, W. Lee, S. Mukerjee, ACS Nano, 2015, 9, 387-400.
10. [10] K. Sato, A. Ito, H. Tomonaga, H. Kanematsu, Y. Wada, H. Asakura, S. Hosokawa, T. Tanaka, T. Toriyama, T. Yamamoto, S. Matsumura, K. Nagaoka, ChemPlusChem, 2019, 84, 442-442.
11. [11] W.-L. Yim, T. Klüner, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 7141-7152.
12. [12] V. Stamenkovic, B. S. Mun, K. J. J. Mayrhofer, P. N. Ross, N. M. Markovic, J. Rossmeisl, J. Greeley, J. K. Nørskov, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 2897-2901.
13. [13] M. Kettner, W. B. Schneider, A. A. Auer, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 15432-15438.
14. [14] E. Antolini, J. R. C. Salgado, M. J. Giz, E. R. Gonzalez, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2005, 30, 1213-1220.
15. [15] U. A. Paulus, A. Wokaun, G. G. Scherer, T. J. Schmidt, V. Stamenkovic, V. Radmilovic, N. M. Markovic, P. N. Ross, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 4181-4191.
16. [16] Y. Zhao, J. Liu, Y. Zhao, F. Wang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 19298-19306.
17. [17] S. Koh, J. Leisch, M. F. Toney, P. Strasser, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 3744-3752.
18. [18] M. Heggen, M. Oezaslan, L. Houben, P. Strasser, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 19073-19083.
19. [19] B. J. Hwang, S. M. S. Kumar, C.-H. Chen, Monalisa, M.-Y. Cheng, D.-G. Liu, J.-F. Lee, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 15267-15276.
20. [20] I. Khalakhan, M. Vorokhta, M. Václavů, B. Šmíd, J. Lavková, I. Matolínová, R. Fiala, N. Tsud, T. Skála, V. Matolín, Electrochim. Acta, 2016, 211, 52-58.
21. [21] L. Wang, Z. Zeng, C. Ma, Y. Liu, M. Giroux, M. Chi, J. Jin, J. Greeley, C. Wang, Nano Lett., 2017, 17, 3391-3395.
22. [22] T. Xiang, L. Fang, J. Wan, L. Liu, J. J. Gao, H. T. Xu, H. J. Zhang, X. Gu, Y. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 21396-21403.
23. [23] V. Papaefthimiou, T. Dintzer, M. Lebedeva, D. Teschner, M. Hävecker, A. Knop-Gericke, R. Schlögl, V. Pierron-Bohnes, E. Savinova, S. Zafeiratos, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 14342-14349.
24. [24] A. Stassi, I. Gatto, V. Baglio, E. Passalacqua, A. S. Aricò, Appl. Catal., B, 2013, 142-143, 15-24.
25. [25] C. T. Campbell, Z. Mao, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 8460-8466.
26. [26] S. L. Hemmingson, C. T. Campbell, ACS Nano, 2017, 11, 1196-1203.
27. [27] A. Trovarelli, P. Fornasiero, Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, 2nd ed., Imperial College Press, London, 2013, 1-908.
28. [28] D. R. Mullins, Surf. Sci. Rep., 2015, 70, 42-85.
29. [29] Y. Lykhach, S. M. Kozlov, T. Skála, A. Tovt, V. Stetsovych, N. Tsud, F. Dvořák, V. Johánek, A. Neitzel, J. Mysliveček, S. Fabris, V. Matolín, K. M. Neyman, J. Libuda, Nat. Mater., 2016, 15, 284-288.
30. [30] G. N. Vayssilov, Y. Lykhach, A. Migani, T. Staudt, G. P. Petrova, N. Tsud, T. Skála, A. Bruix, F. Illas, K. C. Prince, V. Matolín, K. M. Neyman, J. Libuda, Nat. Mater., 2011, 10, 310-315.
31. [31] F. Šutara, M. Cabala, L. Sedláček, T. Skála, M. Škoda, V. Matolín, K. C. Prince, V. Cháb, Thin Solid Films, 2008, 516, 6120-6124.
32. [32] G. Vari, L. Ovari, J. Kiss, Z. Konya, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 5124-5132.
33. [33] V. Matolín, I. Matolínová, L. Sedláček, K. C. Prince, T. Skála, Nanotechnology, 2009, 20, 215706/1-215706/7.
34. [34] J. Libra, KolXPD:Spectroscopy Data Measurement and Processing Software, http://www.kolibrik.net/science/kolxpd/.
35. [35] M. C. Biesinger, B. P. Payne, A. P. Grosvenor, L. W. M. Lau, A. R. Gerson, R. S. C. Smart, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2011, 257, 2717-2730.
36. [36] E. Martono, J. M. Vohs, J. Catal., 2012, 291, 79-86.
37. [37] G. Vári, L. Óvári, C. Papp, H.-P. Steinrück, J. Kiss, Z. Kónya, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119, 9324-9333.
38. [38] T. Skála, F. Šutara, M. Cabala, M. Škoda, K. C. Prince, V. Matolín, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2008, 254, 6860-6865.
39. [39] T. Skála, F. Šutara, K. C. Prince, V. Matolín, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 2009, 169, 20-25.
40. [40] T. Skála, F. Šutara, M. Škoda, K. C. Prince, V. Matolín, J. Phys.:Condens. Matter, 2009, 21, 055005/1-055005/9.
41. [41] Y. Lykhach, A. Figueroba, T. Skála, T. Duchoň, N. Tsud, M. Aulická, A. Neitzel, K. Veltruská, K. C. Prince, V. Matolín, K. M. Neyman, J. Libuda, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 9250-9261.
42. [42] D. Vovchok, C. J. Guild, S. Dissanayake, J. Llorca, E. Stavitski, Z. Liu, R. M. Palomino, I. Waluyo, Y. Li, A. I. Frenkel, J. A. Rodriguez, S. L. Suib, S. D. Senanayake, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2018, 122, 8998-9008.
43. [43] M. C. Saint-Lager, R. Baudoing-Savois, M. De Santis, P. Dolle, Y. Gauthier, Surf. Sci., 1998, 418, 485-492.
44. [44] Calculated Co-Pt phase diagram, MTDATA - Thermodynamics and Phase Equilibrium Software from the National Physical Laboratory, http://resource.npl.co.uk/mtdata/phdiagrams/copt.htm.
45. [45] A. Neitzel, G. Kovács, Y. Lykhach, N. Tsud, S. M. Kozlov, T. Skála, M. Vorokhta, V. Matolín, K. M. Neyman, J. Libuda, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 85688-85697.
46. [46] S. Penner, M. Armbrüster, ChemCatChem, 2015, 7, 374-392.
47. [47] G. F. Cabeza, P. Légaré, A. Sadki, N. J. Castellani, Surf. Sci., 2000, 457, 121-133.
48. [48] P. Légaré, B. Madani, G. F. Cabeza, N. J. Castellani, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2001, 2, 246-250.
49. [49] H. Bulou, A. Barbier, R. Belkhou, C. Guillot, B. Carrière, J. P. Deville, Surf. Sci., 1996, 352-354, 828-832.
50. [50] Y. Lykhach, T. Staudt, M. P. A. Lorenz, R. Streber, A. Bayer, H. P. Steinrück, J. Libuda, ChemPhysChem, 2010, 11, 1496-1504.
51. [51] A. Barbier, B. Carrière, J. P. Deville, Surf. Sci., 1995, 344, 33-41.
52. [52] G. Kovács, S. M. Kozlov, I. Matolínová, M. Vorokhta, V. Matolín, K. M. Neyman, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 28298-28310.
53. [53] M. Vorokhta, I. Khalakhan, M. Václavů, G. Kovács, S. M. Kozlov, P. Kúš, T. Skála, N. Tsud, J. Lavková, V. Potin, I. Matolínová, K. M. Neyman, V. Matolín, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 365, 245-251.
54. [54] D. J. Miller, H. Öberg, S. Kaya, H. Sanchez Casalongue, D. Friebel, T. Anniyev, H. Ogasawara, H. Bluhm, L. G. M. Pettersson, A. Nilsson, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2011, 107, 195502/1-195502/5.

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 11
文章访问数: 880
HTML全文浏览量: 91

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

铈基模型催化剂的纳米结构:有序CeO₂(111)薄膜上的Pt-Co纳米颗粒

English

Nanoscale architecture of ceria-based model catalysts: Pt-Co nanostructures on well-ordered CeO₂(111) thin films

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

铈基模型催化剂的纳米结构:有序CeO2(111)薄膜上的Pt-Co纳米颗粒

English

Nanoscale architecture of ceria-based model catalysts: Pt-Co nanostructures on well-ordered CeO2(111) thin films

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

铈基模型催化剂的纳米结构:有序CeO₂(111)薄膜上的Pt-Co纳米颗粒

Nanoscale architecture of ceria-based model catalysts: Pt-Co nanostructures on well-ordered CeO₂(111) thin films

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs