Module Replacement of Gold Nanoparticles by a Pseudo-AGR Process

Fengming Jin ,  Hongwei Dong ,  Yan Zhao ,  Shengli Zhuang ,  Lingwen Liao ,  Nan Yan ,  Wanmiao Gu ,  Jun Zha ,  Jinyun Yuan ,  Jin Li ,  Haiteng Deng ,  Zibao Gan ,  Jinlong Yang ,  Zhikun Wu

Citation:  Jin Fengming, Dong Hongwei, Zhao Yan, Zhuang Shengli, Liao Lingwen, Yan Nan, Gu Wanmiao, Zha Jun, Yuan Jinyun, Li Jin, Deng Haiteng, Gan Zibao, Yang Jinlong, Wu Zhikun. Module Replacement of Gold Nanoparticles by a Pseudo-AGR Process[J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2020, 78(5): 407-411. doi: 10.6023/A20040134 shu

通过赝反伽伐尼反应实现金纳米粒子模块替换

    通讯作者: 甘自保, zbgan@iim.ac.cn
    伍志鲲, zkwu@issp.ac.cn
  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金 21603234

    国家自然科学基金 21222301

    中国博士后科学基金会 Y94G4E356B

    国家自然科学基金 21971246

    中国科学院/国家外国专家局创新团队国际合作伙伴计划和合肥物质科学技术中心方向项目培育基金 2017FXCX002

    中国科学院合肥研究院院长基金 BJPY2019A02

    国家自然科学基金 21905284

    项目受国家自然科学基金(Nos.21925303, 21971246, 21829501, 21905284, 21771186, 21603234, 21222301, 21171170, 21528303)、中国博士后科学基金会(Y94G4E356B)、中国科学院合肥研究院院长基金(BJPY2019A02)、中科院合肥物质科学研究院"十三五"规划重点支持项目(KP-2017-16)、中国科学院/国家外国专家局创新团队国际合作伙伴计划和合肥物质科学技术中心方向项目培育基金(2017FXCX002)资助

    国家自然科学基金 21171170

    国家自然科学基金 21771186

    中科院合肥物质科学研究院"十三五"规划重点支持项目 KP-2017-16

    国家自然科学基金 21925303

    国家自然科学基金 21829501

    国家自然科学基金 21528303

摘要: 通过可控的方式精确调控纳米粒子的结构仍是一个富有挑战性和鼓舞人心的课题.尽管单原子或两、三个金属原子的精细调控已经在金纳米粒子中实现,涉及三个以上金属原子的取代(模块取代)还没有报道.本工作报道了环己硫醇配体保护的Au48(CHT)26的合成及其通过赝反伽伐尼过程的模块取代.单晶结构揭示模块取代的产物与母体团簇共用一个相似的Au31(CHT)12主体,但剩余部分不同(Au6(CHT)11 vs.Au16(CHT)14).一个有趣的发现是模块取代抑制了Au48(CHT)26的光热过程,却增强了它的发射,赋予了所合成团簇更好的双(多)功能应用潜力.光热效应的减弱和发射的增强也暗示了这两种作用能够彼此至少部分转化,对于研究这两种效应之间的相互影响也具有重要的启示.

English

  • For organic molecules, people can precisely tailor the specific substructure without altering the major carbon bones to endow them with various functions. Meanwhile, for traditional nanoparticles, it is nearly impossible to precisely tune the structure at the atomic level. With the development of wet chemistry, breakthroughs have been achieved in the synthesis of ultrasmall metal nanoparticles (often called nanoclusters (NCs)) in the past decades.[1-10] Metal NCs have the merits of mono-dispersity, [11-14] well-defined compositions and structures, [1, 15-22] intriguing physicochemical properties[7, 23-28] and so on. In particular, these ultrasmall nanoparticles provide opportunities for precisely tuning the overall or even partial structure (including specific sites), which is of great significance to understand the structure-property correlation and improve the performance in a sustainable way. The overall structure transformation has been repeatedly reported; for example, Au25 NCs can be converted into Au20, [29] Au23, [30] Au24, [31] Au28, [32] or Au38[33, 34] by various methods such as ligand exchange/etching, reduction and acid-induction. Recently, the single or few metal-atom tailoring of metal nanoparticles with the remnant structure untouched has also been accomplished. For example, Jin et al. reported an interesting molecular "surgery"[35, 36] by employing the combined anti-galvanic[37-39] and pseudo-anti-galvanic reactions.[31] Wu et al. successfully realized single or few metal-atom addition and replacement by employing an anti-galvanic reaction (AGR)[40-44] (notably, the same group also introduced the surface single-atom tailoring method recently).[45] However, to date, the local structural replacement involving over three net metal atoms (Scheme 1) has not been fulfilled no matter the replacement is an elementary reaction or not. For clarification, such a structure manipulation was named module replacement (MR). To explore such a concept, we conducted this study.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  The illustration of the module replacement process.

    Unlike the common ligands such as 4-tert-butylbenzenethiolate (TBBT), 2, 4-dimethylbenzenethiolate (CHT) (2, 4-DMBT), and p-methylbenzenethiolate (p-MBT), cyclohexanethiolate is short and flexible, making it suitable for this study as a protecting ligand of metal NCs. Actually, cyclohexanethiolated gold NCs have gained extensive interest recently, and several cyclohexanethiolated gold NCs including Au18(CHT)14, [46] [Au23(CHT)16]−, [47] Au28(CHT)20, [48] Au34(CHT)22, [49] Au42(CHT)26, [49] and Au43(CHT)25[50] have been reported and structurally resolved until now. However, it remains unknown whether the cyclohexanethiolated gold NCs larger than Au43(CHT)25[50] can be structurally resolved. To address this issue as well, we investigated the synthesis of cyclohexanethiolated gold NCs and obtained a slightly larger NC Au48(CHT)26.

    Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) was applied to determine the exact molecular formulas of the as-obtained gold NCs. To assist in the ionization, cesium acetate (CsOAC) was added to the NC solution to form positively charged adducts. Notably, the NCs are charge neutral since the charge number is equal to the number of adducted Cs ions, which is further supported by the fact that there were no sound signals in the mass spectra acquired in both the positive and negative ionization modes without the addition of the assistant reagent. As shown in Figure 1a, one dominant peak centered at m/z 6358.95 was shown in the mass spectrum, which can be readily assigned to [Au48(CHT)26Cs2]2+ species (calculated: 6358.37 Da, deviation: 0.58 Da). Therefore, the NC formula was determined to be Au48(CHT)26.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  ESI-MS spectra of Au48(CHT)26 (a) and Au37(CHT)23 (b) NCs.

    Single-crystal X-ray crystallography (SCXC) confirms the composition and reveals that the NCs crystallize in the axisymmetric space group P21/c with the unit cell comprised of a pair of enantiomers (Figure S1). As shown in Figure 2, the overall structure of Au48(CHT)26 is distinctly different from the previously reported Au48(TBBT)28 NC, which is protected by 28 4-tert-butylbenzenethiolates with a Au31 kernel consisting of face-fused bi-icosahedral Au23 and a special Au8 bottom cap.[51] Meanwhile, the structure of Au48(CHT)26 contains a Au35 kernel (Figure 2c) composed of one quasi-fcc Au21 unit (Figure 2a) and one non-fcc Au14 unit (Figure 2b). This quasi-dualpacked-kerneled structure resembles that of Au49(2, 4-DMBT)27, which contains a Au34 kernel consisting of one quasi-fcc Au21 unit and one non-fcc Au13 unit, [52] and it has not been previously reported in cyclohexanethiolated metal NCs. The Au35 kernel of Au48(CHT)26 is capped by an exterior shell including four Au2(SR)3 dimers, five Au(SR)2 monomers and four bridging SR thiolates (Figure 2d-2f).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Anatomy of the structure of the Au48(CHT)26 NC: (a) Au21 quasi-fcc unit; (b) Au14 non-fcc unit; (c) Au35 kernel; (d) Au43(CHT)12 framework; (e) Au48(CHT)22 framework; and (f) total structure of Au48(CHT)26. For clarity, C and H are omitted. Color labels: yellow=S; others=Au.

    A pseudo-anti-galvanic reaction (AGR) was employed for the MR of the as-obtained Au48(CHT)26 due to that pseudo-AGR has shown great potential to modulate the structure of gold NCs in a controlled way.[31, 35, 44] Luckily, we successfully achieved the MR manipulation and obtained a novel NC, whose composition was determined to be Au37(CHT)23 (Figure 1b). SCXC further confirms this composition and reveals that Au37(CHT)23 crystallizes in the axisymmetric space group P-1, with the unit cell comprised of a pair of enantiomers (Figure S2). The overall structure of Au37(CHT)23 is composed of an Au25 kernel capped by an outer shell containing one Au3(SR)4 trimer, three Au2(SR)3 dimers, three Au(SR)2 monomers and four bridging SR thiolates (Figure S3). It can be readily found that the Au35 kernel of Au48(CHT)26 can be regarded as the net addition of one Au10 unit to the Au25 kernel of Au37(CHT)23 (Figure 3a-3f). In the Au10 unit, four Au atoms belong to the part of the quasi-fcc structure, and the other six Au atoms belong to the part of the non-fcc structure. Of note is that the proportion of fcc structure in the kernel of Au37(CHT)23 increases compared to that in the kernel of Au48(CHT)26. However, the Au25 kernel connected staples in Au37(CHT)23 are the same as those in Au48(CHT)26, i.e., Au37(CHT)23 and Au48(CHT)26 share the same Au31(CHT)12 section with the other section different (Au6(CHT)11 vs. Au17(CHT)14). Therefore, the transformation from Au48(CHT)26 to Au37(CHT)23 can be regarded as a MR process (Figure 4), and the net reaction can be described in Table 1. DFT calculations (see Supporting Information for the details) reveal the formation energy (ΔE) is -22.0 eV, indicating that the reaction is energy-favorable. It should be noted that Au48(CHT)26 and Au37(CHT)23 can also be regarded as kernel homologues previously proposed by Zhuang et al.[51] The local internal structural change also leads to the remarkable alternation of the external structure (crystallographic arrangement). As shown in Figure S4, the Au48(CHT)26 adopts the "ABCD" arrangement, which is essentially different from the "ABAB" arrangement in Au37(CHT)23 crystals.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Anatomy of structures of Au37(CHT)23 and Au48(CHT)26 NCs: (a) Au21 quasi-fcc unit of Au48(CHT)26; (b) Au17 quasi-fcc unit of Au37(CHT)23; (c) Au14 non-fcc unit of Au48(CHT)26; (d) Au8 non-fcc unit of Au37(CHT)23; (e) Au35 kernel of Au48(CHT)26; (f) Au25 kernel of Au37(CHT)23; (g) total staple motifs of Au48(CHT)26; (h) total staple motifs of Au37(CHT)23; (i) total structure of Au48(CHT)26; and (j) total structure of Au37(CHT)23. For clarity, C and H are omitted. Color labels: yellow, orange and pink=S; others=Au.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  The illustration of module replacement process from Au48(CHT)26 to Au37(CHT)23.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  The net reaction and the formation energy estimation
    下载: 导出CSV

    More interest pertains to the property tuning of the MR. Photoluminescence is an intriguing property that has been extensively studied, [53-61] while photothermy is rarely studied for well-defined NCs despite its potential in a large range of fields such as energy conversion[62, 63] and biomedicine.[64-68] To the best of our knowledge, the combination study of photoluminescence and photothermy for well-defined metal NCs has not yet been examined. Herein, we investigated and compared their photoluminescence and photothermy. As shown in Figure 5 and Figures S5 and S6, both NCs exhibit obvious photothermal effects. Specifically, the temperatures of Au48(CHT)26 and Au37(CHT)23 solutions with a concentration of 0.1 mmol/L increased by 17.2 ℃ and 12.0 ℃ under the investigated conditions with photothermal conversion efficiencies of 42.9% and 30.3%, respectively (see Figure 5a and Supporting Information), indicating that Au48(CHT)26 had a stronger photothermal effect than Au37(CHT)23, which is also supported by their infrared thermal imaging results (Figure S5). However, the emission intensity of Au37(CHT)23 is about three-fold the intensity of Au48(CHT)26 (Figure 5b), indicating that emission and photothermy are in a balance[69-71] and they can be at least partly converted into each other, which was not previously reported for well-defined NCs. These facts also indicate that MR can efficiently tune the properties of metal NCs. It should be noted that such bi(multiple)-functional NCs are particularly promising for practical applications. For example, such materials might be applied for both imaging and curing cancer since they have both NIR photoluminescence and photothermy properties. Nevertheless, this is beyond the scope of the current study and should be pursued in the future.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  (a) The photothermal effects of Au48(CHT)26 and Au37(CHT)23 with a concentration of 0.1 mmol/L under 0.25 W/cm2 650 nm laser irradiation (laser beam size: 1 cm2). (b) The photoluminescence spectra of Au48(CHT)26 and Au37(CHT)23 (the excitation wavelength λex=650 nm).

    In summary, we have succeeded in synthesizing the largest cyclohexanethiolated metal NCs structurally resolved by ESI-MS and SCXC, revealing that one NC is composed of 48 gold atoms and 26 cyclohexanethiolates with a quasi-dual-packed-kerneled structure not reported in cyclohexanethiolated metal NCs. For the first time, we fulfill the MR manipulation of metal NCs by a pseudo-AGR process and obtain another novel NC Au37(CHT)23, which can also be regarded as the kernel homologue of Au48(CHT)26. DFT calculations also support the transformation from Au48(CHT)26 to Au37(CHT)23 is energy-favorable. The MR weakens the photoluminescence but strengthens the photothermy in this work, indicating that photoluminescence and photothermy are in a balance and they can be at least partly converted into each other for NCs. The property tuning by MR might endow NCs better potential for bi(multiple)-functional applications, which need to be pursued in the future. Overall, our work not only provides novel insights into the structures of metal NCs but also has important implications for future tuning of the compositions, structures and properties of metal nanoparticles and understanding of the interactions between various properties as well.

    The synthesis is facile. Briefly, the precursors of the polydisperse Aux(CHT)y clusters were first synthesized by reducing the Au(I)-(CHT) complexes with NaBH4. Then, the Aux(CHT)y was treated with excess cyclohexanethiol at 80 ℃ for 15 h. The crude products were washed with excess methanol and then purified by preparative thin-layer chromatography (PTLC) (see Supporting Information for the experimental details). The as-purified NCs were recrystallized from the solution of toluene/methanol (V:V=4:3) at 0 ℃ over one week.


    Supporting information for this article is available free of charge via the Internet at http://sioc-journal.cn
    1. [1]

      Jadzinsky, P. D.; Calero, G.; Ackerson, C. J.; Bushnell, D. A.; Kornberg, R. D. Science 2007, 318, 430. doi: 10.1126/science.1148624

    2. [2]

      Negishi, Y.; Chaki, N. K.; Shichibu, Y.; Whetten, R. L.; Tsukuda, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11322. doi: 10.1021/ja073580+

    3. [3]

      Sánchez-Castillo, A.; Noguez, C.; Garzón, I. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1504. doi: 10.1021/ja907365f

    4. [4]

      Parker, J. F.; Fields-Zinna, C. A.; Murray, R. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 1289. doi: 10.1021/ar100048c

    5. [5]

      Desireddy, A.; Conn, B. E.; Guo, J.; Yoon, B.; Barnett, R. N.; Monahan, B. M.; Kirschbaum, K.; Griffith, W. P.; Whetten, R. L.; Landman, U.; Bigioni, T. P. Nature 2013, 501, 399. doi: 10.1038/nature12523

    6. [6]

      Yamazoe, S.; Koyasu, K.; Tsukuda, T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 816. doi: 10.1021/ar400209a

    7. [7]

      Mathew, A.; Pradeep, T. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 1017. doi: 10.1002/ppsc.201400033

    8. [8]

      Alhilaly, M. J.; Bootharaju, M. S.; Joshi, C. P.; Besong, T. M.; Emwas, A. H.; Juarez-Mosqueda, R.; Kaappa, S.; Malola, S.; Adil, K.; Shkurenko, A.; Hakkinen, H.; Eddaoudi, M.; Bakr, O. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 14727. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b09007

    9. [9]

      Zhao, Y.; Zhuang, S.; Liao, L.; Wang, C.; Xia, N.; Gan, Z.; Gu, W.; Li, J.; Deng, H.; Wu, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 973. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b11017

    10. [10]

      Zhu, M.; Li, M.; Yao, C.; Xia, N.; Zhao, Y.; Yan, N.; Liao, L.; Wu, Z. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2018, 34, 792. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201710091

    11. [11]

      Qian, H.; Zhu, Y.; Jin, R. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 3795. doi: 10.1021/nn901137h

    12. [12]

      Jin, R.; Qian, H.; Wu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, M.; Mohanty, A.; Garg, N. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2903. doi: 10.1021/jz100944k

    13. [13]

      Wu, Z.; MacDonald, M. A.; Chen, J.; Zhang, P.; Jin, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 9670. doi: 10.1021/ja2028102

    14. [14]

      Knoppe, S.; Boudon, J.; Dolamic, I.; Dass, A.; Bürgi, T. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 5056. doi: 10.1021/ac200789v

    15. [15]

      Qian, H.; Eckenhoff, W. T.; Zhu, Y.; Pintauer, T.; Jin, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8280. doi: 10.1021/ja103592z

    16. [16]

      Yang, H.; Wang, Y.; Huang, H.; Gell, L.; Lehtovaara, L.; Malola, S.; Häkkinen, H.; Zheng, N. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2422. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3422

    17. [17]

      Chen, J.; Zhang, Q. F.; Williard, P. G.; Wang, L. S. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 3932. doi: 10.1021/ic500562r

    18. [18]

      Tian, S.; Li, Y.-Z.; Li, M.-B.; Yuan, J.; Yang, J.; Wu, Z.; Jin, R. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8667. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9667

    19. [19]

      Dass, A.; Theivendran, S.; Nimmala, P. R.; Kumara, C.; Jupally, V. R.; Fortunelli, A.; Sementa, L.; Barcaro, G.; Zuo, X.; Noll, B. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4610. doi: 10.1021/ja513152h

    20. [20]

      Zeng, C.; Liu, C.; Chen, Y.; Rosi, N. L.; Jin, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 8710. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04835

    21. [21]

      Wan, X.-K.; Cheng, X.-L.; Tang, Q.; Han, Y.-Z.; Hu, G.; Jiang, D. E.; Wang, Q.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 9451. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b04622

    22. [22]

      Zhang, S.-S.; Feng, L.; Senanayake, R. D.; Aikens, C. M.; Wang, X.-P.; Zhao, Q.-Q.; Tung, C.-H.; Sun, D. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 1251. doi: 10.1039/C7SC03566G

    23. [23]

      Chen, S.; Ingram, R. S.; Hostetler, M. J.; Pietron, J. J.; Murray, R. W.; Schaaff, T. G.; Khoury, J. T.; Alvarez, M. M.; Whetten, R. L. Science 1998, 280, 2098. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5372.2098

    24. [24]

      Tsunoyama, H.; Ichikuni, N.; Sakurai, H.; Tsukuda, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7086. doi: 10.1021/ja810045y

    25. [25]

      Gao, Y.; Shao, N.; Pei, Y.; Zeng, X. C. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1055. doi: 10.1021/nl100017u

    26. [26]

      Luo, Z.; Zheng, K.; Xie, J. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 5143. doi: 10.1039/C3CC47512C

    27. [27]

      Azubel, M.; Koivisto, J.; Malola, S.; Bushnell, D.; Hura, G. L.; Koh, A. L.; Tsunoyama, H.; Tsukuda, T.; Pettersson, M.; Häkkinen, H.; Kornberg, R. D. Science 2014, 345, 909. doi: 10.1126/science.1251959

    28. [28]

      Li, M.; Tian, S.; Wu, Z. Chin. J. Chem. 2017, 35, 567. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.201600526

    29. [29]

      Zeng, C.; Liu, C.; Chen, Y.; Rosi, N. L.; Jin, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11922. doi: 10.1021/ja506802n

    30. [30]

      Song, Y.; Abroshan, H.; Chai, J.; Kang, X.; Kim, H.; Zhu, M.; Jin, R. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 3055. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00058

    31. [31]

      Yao, C.; Tian, S.; Liao, L.; Liu, X.; Xia, N.; Yan, N.; Gan, Z.; Wu, Z. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 16200. doi: 10.1039/C5NR04760A

    32. [32]

      Zeng, C.; Li, T.; Das, A.; Rosi, N. L.; Jin, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10011. doi: 10.1021/ja404058q

    33. [33]

      Xia, N.; Gan, Z.; Liao, L.; Zhuang, S.; Wu, Z. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 11646. doi: 10.1039/C7CC06210A

    34. [34]

      Dainese, T.; Antonello, S.; Bogialli, S.; Fei, W.; Venzo, A.; Maran, F. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 7057. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b02780

    35. [35]

      Li, Q.; Luo, T.; Taylor, M. G.; Wang, S.; Zhu, X.; Song, Y.; Mpourmpakis, G.; Rosi, N. L.; Jin, R. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1603193. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1603193

    36. [36]

      伍志鲲, 物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 1930. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201706026Wu, Z. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 1930(in Chinese). doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201706026

    37. [37]

      Wu, Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 2934. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107822

    38. [38]

      Tian, S.; Yao, C.; Liao, L.; Xia, N.; Wu, Z. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 11773. doi: 10.1039/C5CC03267A

    39. [39]

      Gan, Z.; Xia, N.; Wu, Z. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 2774. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00374

    40. [40]

      Yao, C.; Lin, Y.; Yuan, J.; Liao, L.; Zhu, M.; Weng, L.; Yang, J.; Wu, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 15350. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b09627

    41. [41]

      Yao, C.; Lin, Y.; Yuan, J.; Liao, L.; Zhu, M.; Weng, L.; Yang, J.; Wu, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 15350. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b09627

    42. [42]

      Liao, L.; Zhou, S.; Dai, Y.; Liu, L.; Yao, C.; Fu, C.; Yang, J.; Wu, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9511. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b03483

    43. [43]

      Zhu, M.; Wang, P.; Yan, N.; Qi, C.; He, L.; Zhao, Y.; Xia, N.; Yao, C.; Li, J.; Deng, H.; Zhu, Y.; Pei, Y.; Wu, Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 4500. doi: 10.1002/anie.201800877

    44. [44]

      Zhang, W.; Zhuang, S.; Liao, L.; Dong, H.; Xia, N.; Li, J.; Deng, H.; Wu, Z. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 5388. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00125

    45. [45]

      Gan, Z.; Chen, J.; Liao, L.; Zhang, H.; Wu, Z. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 204. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02982

    46. [46]

      Das, A.; Liu, C.; Byun, H. Y.; Nobusada, K.; Zhao, S.; Rosi, N.; Jin, R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 3140. doi: 10.1002/anie.201410161

    47. [47]

      Das, A.; Li, T.; Nobusada, K.; Zeng, C.; Rosi, N. L.; Jin, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18264. doi: 10.1021/ja409177s

    48. [48]

      Chen, Y.; Liu, C.; Tang, Q.; Zeng, C.; Higaki, T.; Das, A.; Jiang, D. E.; Rosi, N. L.; Jin, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1482. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b12094

    49. [49]

      Dong, H.; Liao, L.; Zhuang, S.; Yao, C.; Chen, J.; Tian, S.; Zhu, M.; Liu, X.; Li, L.; Wu, Z. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 3742. doi: 10.1039/C6NR09724C

    50. [50]

      Dong, H.; Liao, L.; Wu, Z. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 5338. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02459

    51. [51]

      Zhuang, S.; Liao, L.; Yuan, J.; Wang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Xia, N.; Gan, Z.; Gu, W.; Li, J.; Deng, H.; Yang, J.; Wu, Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 15450. doi: 10.1002/anie.201808997

    52. [52]

      Liao, L.; Zhuang, S.; Wang, P.; Xu, Y.; Yan, N.; Dong, H.; Wang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Xia, N.; Li, J.; Deng, H.; Pei, Y.; Tian, S. K.; Wu, Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 12644. doi: 10.1002/anie.201707582

    53. [53]

      Wu, Z.; Jin, R. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 2568. doi: 10.1021/nl101225f

    54. [54]

      Yu, Y.; Luo, Z.; Chevrier, D. M.; Leong, D. T.; Zhang, P.; Jiang, D. E.; Xie, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1246. doi: 10.1021/ja411643u

    55. [55]

      Wang, S.; Zhu, X.; Cao, T.; Zhu, M. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 5777. doi: 10.1039/c3nr06722j

    56. [56]

      Pyo, K.; Thanthirige, V. D.; Kwak, K.; Pandurangan, P.; Ramakrishna, G.; Lee, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 8244. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b04210

    57. [57]

      Gan, Z.; Lin, Y.; Luo, L.; Han, G.; Liu, W.; Liu, Z.; Yao, C.; Weng, L.; Liao, L.; Chen, J.; Liu, X.; Luo, Y.; Wang, C.; Wei, S.; Wu, Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 11567. doi: 10.1002/anie.201606661

    58. [58]

      Goswami, N.; Yao, Q.; Luo, Z.; Li, J.; Chen, T.; Xie, J. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 962. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02765

    59. [59]

      Sugiuchi, M.; Maeba, J.; Okubo, N.; Iwamura, M.; Nozaki, K.; Konishi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 17731. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b10201

    60. [60]

      Gan, Z.; Chen, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Li, M. B.; Yao, C.; Zhuang, S.; Xu, A.; Li, L.; Wu, Z. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14739. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14739

    61. [61]

      Zhuang, S.; Liao, L.; Yuan, J.; Xia, N.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, C.; Gan, Z.; Yan, N.; He, L.; Li, J.; Deng, H.; Guan, Z.; Yang, J.; Wu, Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 4510. doi: 10.1002/anie.201813426

    62. [62]

      Wang, P. Environ. Sci.:Nano 2018, 5, 1078. doi: 10.1039/C8EN00156A

    63. [63]

      Jin, Y.; Chang, J.; Shi, Y.; Shi, L.; Hong, S.; Wang, P. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 7942. doi: 10.1039/C8TA00187A

    64. [64]

      Huang, X.; El-Sayed, I. H.; Qian, W.; El-Sayed, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2115. doi: 10.1021/ja057254a

    65. [65]

      Huang, X.; Jain, P. K.; El-Sayed, I. H.; El-Sayed, M. A. Lasers Med. Sci. 2008, 23, 217. doi: 10.1007/s10103-007-0470-x

    66. [66]

      Chen, J.; Glaus, C.; Laforest, R.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, M.; Gidding, M.; Welch, M. J.; Xia, Y. Small 2010, 6, 811. doi: 10.1002/smll.200902216

    67. [67]

      Tang, S.; Huang, X.; Zheng, N. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 3948. doi: 10.1039/c1cc10451a

    68. [68]

      Tang, S.; Chen, M.; Zheng, N. Nano Res. 2014, 8, 165. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276234875_Multifunctional_ultrasmall_Pd_nanosheets_for_enhanced_near-infrared_photothermal_therapy_and_chemotherapy_of_cancer

    69. [69]

      Abadeer, N. S.; Murphy, C. J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 4691. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11232

    70. [70]

      Liu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Huang, X.; Yu, G.; Wang, S.; Zhou, Z.; Shen, Z.; Fan, W.; Liu, Y.; Davisson, M.; Kalish, H.; Niu, G.; Nie, Z.; Chen, X. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 8129. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b02980

    71. [71]

      Lu, B.; Chen, Y.; Li, P.; Wang, B.; Mullen, K.; Yin, M. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 767. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08434-4

  • Scheme 1  The illustration of the module replacement process.

    Figure 1  ESI-MS spectra of Au48(CHT)26 (a) and Au37(CHT)23 (b) NCs.

    Figure 2  Anatomy of the structure of the Au48(CHT)26 NC: (a) Au21 quasi-fcc unit; (b) Au14 non-fcc unit; (c) Au35 kernel; (d) Au43(CHT)12 framework; (e) Au48(CHT)22 framework; and (f) total structure of Au48(CHT)26. For clarity, C and H are omitted. Color labels: yellow=S; others=Au.

    Figure 3  Anatomy of structures of Au37(CHT)23 and Au48(CHT)26 NCs: (a) Au21 quasi-fcc unit of Au48(CHT)26; (b) Au17 quasi-fcc unit of Au37(CHT)23; (c) Au14 non-fcc unit of Au48(CHT)26; (d) Au8 non-fcc unit of Au37(CHT)23; (e) Au35 kernel of Au48(CHT)26; (f) Au25 kernel of Au37(CHT)23; (g) total staple motifs of Au48(CHT)26; (h) total staple motifs of Au37(CHT)23; (i) total structure of Au48(CHT)26; and (j) total structure of Au37(CHT)23. For clarity, C and H are omitted. Color labels: yellow, orange and pink=S; others=Au.

    Figure 4  The illustration of module replacement process from Au48(CHT)26 to Au37(CHT)23.

    Figure 5  (a) The photothermal effects of Au48(CHT)26 and Au37(CHT)23 with a concentration of 0.1 mmol/L under 0.25 W/cm2 650 nm laser irradiation (laser beam size: 1 cm2). (b) The photoluminescence spectra of Au48(CHT)26 and Au37(CHT)23 (the excitation wavelength λex=650 nm).

    Table 1.  The net reaction and the formation energy estimation

    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  12
  • 文章访问数:  4357
  • HTML全文浏览量:  353
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2020-05-15
  • 收稿日期:  2020-04-30
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-05-01
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章