固态锂电池界面优化策略的研究进展

引用本文: 赵永智, 陈晨阳, 刘文燚, 胡伟飞, 刘金平. 固态锂电池界面优化策略的研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2023, 39(8): 221101. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202211017 shu

Citation: Yongzhi Zhao, Chenyang Chen, Wenyi Liu, Weifei Hu, Jinping Liu. Research Progress of Interface Optimization Strategies for Solid-State Lithium Batteries[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2023, 39(8): 221101. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202211017 shu

固态锂电池界面优化策略的研究进展

武汉理工大学化学化工与生命科学学院，材料复合新技术国家重点实验室，武汉 430070

通讯作者: 刘金平, liujp@whut.edu.cn

基金项目:
国家自然科学基金 51972257

国家自然科学基金 52172229

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金 2022IVA197

摘要: 固态锂电池具有安全性好、能量密度高等优点，在新能源汽车和智能电子等领域具有广泛的应用前景。然而，由化学/电化学和物理因素引起的界面副反应与高界面阻抗问题制约了其进一步发展。先前的综述已对解决化学/电化学界面问题的方法有了相对全面的阐述，但并未细致讨论不同结构固态电池中物理界面的影响及应对策略。本文将简要介绍化学/电化学界面问题及其解决方案；重点按结构特点将固态锂电池分为三明治结构、粉末复合结构和3D一体化结构，细致地分析不同电池结构的物理界面特点与优化策略，并对各种策略的优缺点进行比较分析；最后，对固态锂电池电极/电解质界面的未来研究方向进行展望。

关键词:

English

Research Progress of Interface Optimization Strategies for Solid-State Lithium Batteries

School of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

Corresponding author: Jinping Liu, Email: liujp@whut.edu.cn

Received Date: 08 November 2022
Accepted Date: 12 December 2022
Revised Date: 05 December 2022
Available Online: 15 August 2023
Fund Project:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China

the National Natural Science Foundation of China

the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Abstract: With the rapid development of electric vehicles and intelligent electronics, Li-based batteries are required to have a higher specific capacity and better safety. To develop batteries with higher energy densities, Li may be used as an anode material owing to its higher theoretical capacity (3860 mAh·g⁻¹, 10 times higher than graphite) and low redox potential (−3.04 V vs. the standard hydrogen electrode). However, uncontrolled Li dendrite growth may occur during electrochemical Li plating/stripping in the liquid electrolyte and may penetrate the separator, resulting in a short circuit of the battery. In addition, the conventional liquid organic electrolyte is flammable and easy to leak, posing safety concerns regarding fire and explosion risks. To address these issues, solid-state electrolytes are considered as a particularly ideal alternative because of their desirable mechanical properties, highly reduced flammability, and reduced risk of leakage. Such properties are expected to prevent Li dendrite growth, mitigate structural damage of the Li anode, and improve battery safety. Nonetheless, it is still a great challenge to manufacture solid-state batteries with high areal capacity and good rate performance stems from the high interfacial resistance between the electrolyte and electrode, which hinders Li-ion transport. Therefore, understanding and addressing the general interface issues in solid-state batteries is key to manufacturing high-performance solid-state lithium batteries. Interface issues in solid-state batteries are highly complex and may be broadly categorized into chemical/electrochemical interface and physical interface problems. The chemical/electrochemical interface problem comprises the narrow electrochemical stability window, elemental interdiffusion, and space charge layers, while the physical interface problem can be divided into rigid interfacial contact, volume change during cycling, and fracture and pulverization caused by stress accumulation. Previous reports represent a relatively comprehensive summary of the methods to solve the chemical/electrochemical interface problems but do not discuss in detail the influence of physical interfaces in solid-state batteries of different structures and the related addressing strategies. First, this review will briefly introduce the chemical/electrochemical interface problems and their solutions. Then, solid-state lithium batteries are divided into divided into the sandwich structure, powder composite structure, and 3D integrated structure, according to the key structural characteristics; the physical interface characteristics and optimization strategies of different battery structures are further analyzed in detail, and the advantages and disadvantages of each system are compared and analyzed. Finally, the future research direction of the electrode/electrolyte interface in solid-state lithium batteries is presented.

Key words:

1. [1]
  Liu, L.; Wu, Z. C.; Zheng, Z.; Zhou, Q. J.; Chen, K.; Yin, P. C. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 33, 4326. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.031
2. [2]
  Song, K. M.; Chen, W. H. Chem 2021, 7, 3195. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.11.016
3. [3]
  Deysher, G.; Ridley, P.; Ham, S. Y.; Doux, J. M.; Chen, Y. T.; Wu, E. A.; Tan, D. H. S.; Cronk, A.; Jang, J.; Meng, Y. S. Mater. Today Phys. 2022, 24, 2542. doi: 10.1016/j.mtphys.2022.100679
4. [4]
  Zhao, B. L.; Ma, L. X.; Wu, K.; Cao, M. X.; Xu, M. G.; Zhang, X. X.; Liu, W.; Chen, J. T. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 125. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.10.045
5. [5]
  Zhao, T.; Li, S. W.; Liu, F.; Wang, Z. Q.; Wang, H. L.; Liu, Y. J.; Tang, X. Y.; Bai, M.; Zhang, M.; Ma, Y. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 45, 796. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.12.032
6. [6]
  Zhou, B. X.; Bonakdarpour, A.; Stosevski, I.; Fang, B. Z.; Wilkinson, D. P. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2022, 130, 79. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100996
7. [7]
  Banerjee, A.; Wang, X.; Fang, C.; Wu, E. A.; Meng, Y. S. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 6878. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101
8. [8]
  王晗, 安汉文, 单红梅, 赵雷, 王家钧. 物理化学学报, 2021, 36, 2007070. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202007070Wang, H.; An, H, W.; Shan, H. M. .; Zhao, L.; Wang, J. J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 36, 2007070. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202007070
9. [9]
  Zhang, Z. H.; Wu, L. P.; Zhou, D.; Weng, W.; Yao, X. Y. Nano Lett. 2021, 21, 5233. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01344
10. [10]
  Kato, Y.; Hori, S.; Saito, T.; Suzuki, K.; Hirayama, M.; Mitsui, A.; Yonemura, M.; Iba, H.; Kanno, R. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 7. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.30
11. [11]
  Kamaya, N.; Homma, K.; Yamakawa, Y.; Hirayama, M.; Kanno, R.; Yonemura, M.; Kamiyama, T.; Kato, Y.; Hama, S.; Kawamoto, K.; et al. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 682. doi: 10.1038/nmat3066
12. [12]
  Lu, Y.; Li, L.; Zhang, Q.; Niu, Z.Q.; Chen, J. Joule 2018, 2, 1747. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.07.028
13. [13]
  Wang, H. C.; Zhu, J. P.; Su, Y.; Gong, Z. L.; Yang, Y. Sci. China-Chem. 2021, 64, 879. doi: 10.1007/s11426-021-9985-x
14. [14]
  Goodenough, J. B.; Kim, Y. Chem. Mat. 2010, 22, 587. doi: 10.1021/cm901452z
15. [15]
  Wenzel, S.; Leichtweiss, T.; Kruger, D.; Sann, J.; Janek, J. Solid State Ion. 2015, 278, 98. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2015.06.001
16. [16]
  Rehnlund, D.; Wang, Z. H.; Nyholm, L. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2108827. doi: 10.1002/adma.202108827
17. [17]
  Haruyama, J.; Sodeyama, K.; Tateyama, Y. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 286. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b08435
18. [18]
  Sakuda, A.; Hayashi, A.; Tatsumisago, M. Chem. Mat. 2010, 22, 949. doi: 10.1021/cm901819c
19. [19]
  Park, K.; Yu, B. C.; Jung, J. W.; Li, Y. T.; Zhou, W. D.; Gao, H. C.; Son, S.; Goodenough, J. B. Chem. Mat. 2016, 28, 8051. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03870
20. [20]
  Richards, W. D.; Miara, L. J.; Wang, Y.; Kim, J. C.; Ceder, G. Chem. Mat. 2016, 28, 266. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04082
21. [21]
  Lu, G.; Geng, F.; Gu, S.; Li, C.; Shen, M.; Hu, B. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 25556. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c05239
22. [22]
  Cheng, Z.; Liu, M.; Ganapathy, S.; Li, C.; Li, Z. L.; Zhang, X. Y.; He, P.; Zhou, H. S.; Wagemaker, M. Joule 2020, 4, 131. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.04.002
23. [23]
  Liu, S. L.; Liu, W. Y.; Ba, D. L.; Zhao, Y. Z.; Ye, Y. H.; Li, Y. Y.; Liu, J. P. Adv. Mater. 2022, 2110423. doi: 10.1002/adma.202110423
24. [24]
  Nisar, U.; Muralidharan, N.; Essehli, R.; Amin, R.; Belharouak, I. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 38, 309. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.03.015
25. [25]
  Kitsche, D.; Tang, Y. S.; Ma, Y.; Goonetilleke, D.; Sann, J.; Walther, F.; Bianchini, M.; Janek, J.; Brezesinski, T. ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. 2021, 4, 7338. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c01487
26. [26]
  Ma, Y.; Teo, J. H.; Walther, F.; Ma, Y. J.; Zhang, R. Z.; Mazilkin, A.; Tang, Y. S.; Goonetilleke, D.; Janek, J.; Bianchini, M.; et al. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 15, 2111829. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202111829
27. [27]
  Peng, L. F.; Ren, H. T.; Zhang, J. Z.; Chen, S. J.; Yu, C.; Miao, X. F.; Zhang, Z. Q.; He, Z. Y.; Yu, M.; Zhang, L.; et al. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 43, 53. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.08.028
28. [28]
  Li, X.; Ren, Z. H.; Banis, M. N.; Deng, S. X.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, Q.; Wang, C. H.; Yang, X. F.; Li, W. H.; Liang, J. W.; et al. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 2480. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01676
29. [29]
  Liu, Y. L.; Sun, Q.; Liu, J. R.; Banis, M. N.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, B. Q.; Adair, K.; Hu, Y. F.; Xiao, Q. F.; Zhang, C.; et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 2293. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b16343
30. [30]
  Tsai, W. Y.; Thundat, T.; Nanda, J. Matter 2021, 4, 2119. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2021.06.014
31. [31]
  Gao, Y.; Du, X. Q.; Hou, Z.; Shen, X.; Mai, Y. W.; Tarascon, J. M.; Zhang, B. A. Joule 2021, 5, 1860. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.015
32. [32]
  Krauskopf, T.; Richter, F. H.; Zeier, W. G.; Janek, J. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 7745. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00431
33. [33]
  Xu, B. Y.; Li, X. Y.; Yang, C.; Li, Y. T.; Grundish, N. S.; Chien, P. H.; Dong, K.; Manke, I.; Fang, R. Y.; Wu, N.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 6542. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c00752
34. [34]
  Mi, J.S.; Ma, J.B.; Chen, L.K.; Lai, C.; Yang, K.; Biao, J.; Xia, H.Y.; Song, X.; Lv, W.; Zhong, G.M. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 48, 375. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.02.048
35. [35]
  Arrese-Igor, M.; Martinez-Ibanez, M.; Pavlenko, E.; Forsyth, M.; Zhu, H.; Armand, M.; Aguesse, F.; Lopez-Aranguren, P. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7, 1473. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00488
36. [36]
  Wang, P.; Qu, W. J.; Song, W. L.; Chen, H. S.; Chen, R. J.; Fang, D. N. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 29. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201900950
37. [37]
  Tian, H. K.; Qi, Y. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 16, 3512. doi: 10.1149/2.0481711jes
38. [38]
  Stallard, J. C.; Wheatcroft, L.; Booth, S. G.; Boston, R.; Corr, S. A.; De Volder, M. F. L.; Inkson, B. J.; Fleck, N. A. Joule 2022, 6, 984. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.04.001
39. [39]
  Liu, Y. Y.; Tzeng, Y. K.; Lin, D. C.; Pei, A.; Lu, H. Y.; Melosh, N. A.; Shen, Z. X.; Chu, S.; Cui, Y. Joule 2018, 2, 1595. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.007
40. [40]
  Kasemchainan, J.; Zekoll, S.; Jolly, D. S.; Ning, Z.; Hartley, G. O.; Marrow, J.; Bruce, P. G. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 1105. doi: 10.1038/s41563-019-0438-9
41. [41]
  Yamada, H.; Ito, T.; Basappa, R. H.; Bekarevich, R.; Mitsuishi, K. J. Power Sources 2017, 368, 97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.076
42. [42]
  Zhang, W. B.; Schroder, D.; Arlt, T.; Manke, I.; Koerver, R.; Pinedo, R.; Weber, D. A.; Sann, J.; Zeier, W. G.; Janek, J. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 9929. doi: 10.1039/c7ta02730c
43. [43]
  Liang, J. Y.; Zeng, X. X.; Zhang, X. D.; Zuo, T. T.; Yan, M.; Yin, Y. X.; Shi, J. L.; Wu, X. W.; Guo, Y. G.; Wan, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 9165. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b03517
44. [44]
  Duan, H.; Yin, Y. X.; Shi, Y.; Wang, P. F.; Zhang, X. D.; Yang, C. P.; Shi, J. L.; Wen, R.; Guo, Y. G.; Wan, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 14, 82. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b10864
45. [45]
  Wu, J. Y.; Ju, Z. Y.; Zhang, X.; Marschilok, A. C.; Takeuchi, K. J.; Wang, H. L.; Takeuchi, E. S.; Yu, G. H. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2202780. doi: 10.1002/adma.202202780
46. [46]
  Deng, C. L.; Chen, N.; Hou, C. Y.; Liu, H. X.; Zhou, Z. M.; Chen, R. J. Small 2021, 17, 9. doi: 10.1002/smll.202006578
47. [47]
  Guo, S. J.; Li, Y. T.; Li, B.; Grundish, N. S.; Cao, A. M.; Sun, Y. G.; Xu, Y. S.; Ji, Y. L. M.; Qiao, Y.; Zhang, Q. H.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 2179. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c10872
48. [48]
  Liu, Y. Q.; Wang, X.; Ghosh, S. K.; Zou, M.; Zhou, H.; Xiao, X. H.; Meng, X. B. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 2737. doi: 10.1039/d1dt03600a
49. [49]
  Deng, T.; Ji, X.; Zhao, Y.; Cao, L. S.; Li, S.; Hwang, S.; Luo, C.; Wang, P. F.; Jia, H. P.; Fan, X. L.; et al. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2000030. doi: 10.1002/adma.202000030
50. [50]
  Shao, Y. J.; Wang, H. C.; Gong, Z. L.; Wang, D. W.; Zheng, B. Z.; Zhu, J. P.; Lu, Y. X.; Hu, Y. S.; Guo, X. X.; Li, H.; et al. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 1212. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00453
51. [51]
  赵江辉, 谢茂玲, 张海洋, 易若玮, 胡晨吉, 康拓, 郑磊, 崔瑞广, 陈宏伟, 沈炎宾, 等. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2104003. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202104003Zhao, J. H.; Xie, M. L.; Zhang, H. Y.; Yi, R. W.; Hu, C. J.; Kang, T.; Zheng, L.; Cui, R. G.; Chen, H. W.; Shen, Y. B.; et al. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2104003. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202104003
52. [52]
  Strauss, F.; Bartsch, T.; de Biasi, L.; Kim, A. Y.; Janek, J.; Hartmann, P.; Brezesinski, T. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 992. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00275
53. [53]
  Shi, T.; Tu, Q. S.; Tian, Y. S.; Xiao, Y. H.; Miara, L. J.; Kononova, O.; Ceder, G. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1902881. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201902881
54. [54]
  Zhao, J.; Zhao, C.; Zhu, J. P.; Liu, X. S.; Yao, J. M.; Wang, B.; Dai, Q. S.; Wang, Z. F.; Chen, J. Z.; Jia, P.; et al. Nano Lett. 2022, 2, 411. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04076
55. [55]
  Jiang, W.; Zhu, X. X.; Huang, R. Z.; Zhao, S.; Fan, X. M.; Ling, M.; Liang, C. D.; Wang, L. G. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 2103473. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202103473
56. [56]
  Yang, C.P.; Wu, Q.S.; Xie, W.Q.; Zhang, X.; Brozena, A.; Zheng, J.; Garaga, M. N.; Ko, B. H.; Mao, Y.M.; He, S.M.; et al. Nature 2021, 598, 590. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03885-6
57. [57]
  Li, Z.; Zhou, X. Y.; Guo, X. Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 29, 149. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.04.015
58. [58]
  Bi, Z. J.; Mu, S.; Zhao, N.; Sun, W. H.; Huang, W. L.; Guo, X. X. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 35, 512. doi: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.11.038
59. [59]
  Yubuchi, S.; Uematsu, M.; Deguchi, M.; Hayashi, A.; Tatsumisago, M. ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. 2018, 1, 3622. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.8b00280
60. [60]
  Xiao, Y. R.; Turcheniuk, K.; Narla, A.; Song, A. Y.; Ren, X. L.; Magasinski, A.; Jain, A.; Huang, S.; Lee, H.; Yushin, G. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20, 984. doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-00943-2
61. [61]
  Geng, Z.; Huang, Y. L.; Sun, G. C.; Chen, R. S.; Cao, W. Z.; Zheng, J. Y.; Li, H. Nano Energy 2022, 91, 2211. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106679
62. [62]
  Gao, X.W.; Liu, B.Y.; Hu, B.K.; Ning, Z.Y.; Jolly, D. S.; Zhang, S.M.; Perera, J.; Bu, J.; Liu, J.L.; Doerrer, C.; et al. Joule 2022, 6, 636. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2022.02.008
63. [63]
  朱高龙, 赵辰孜, 袁洪, 南皓雄, 赵铂琛, 侯立鹏, 何传新, 刘全兵, 黄佳琦. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2005003. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202005003Zhu, G. L.; Zhao, C. Z.; Yuan, H.; Nan, H. X.; Zhao, B. C.; Hou, L. P.; He, C. X.; Liu, Q. B.; Huang, J. Q. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2005003. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202005003
64. [64]
  Doux, J. M.; Yang, Y. Y. C.; Tan, D. H. S.; Nguyen, H.; Wu, E. A.; Wang, X. F.; Banerjee, A.; Meng, Y. S. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 5049. doi: 10.1039/c9ta12889a
65. [65]
  Li, L. P.; Liu, W. Y.; Dong, H. Y.; Gui, Q. Y.; Hu, Z. Q.; Li, Y. Y.; Liu, J. P. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 20204959. doi: 10.1002/adma.202004959
66. [66]
  Nie, L.; Chen, S. J.; Zhang, C.; Dong, L.; He, Y. J.; Gao, T. Y.; Yu, J. M.; Liu, W. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2022, 3, 100851. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100851
67. [67]
  Liu, W. Y.; Yi, C. J.; Li, L. P.; Liu, S. L.; Gui, Q. Y.; Ba, D. L.; Li, Y. Y.; Peng, D. L.; Liu, J. P. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2021, 60, 12931. doi: 10.1002/anie.202101537
68. [68]
  Xia, Q. Y.; Zhang, Q. H.; Sun, S.; Hussain, F.; Zhang, C. C.; Zhu, X. H.; Meng, F. Q.; Liu, K. M.; Geng, H.; Xu, J.; et al. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2003524. doi: 10.1002/adma.202003524
69. [69]
  Salian, G. D.; Lebouin, C.; Demoulin, A.; Lepihin, M. S.; Maria, S.; Galeyeva, A. K.; Kurbatov, A. P.; Djenizian, T. J. Power Sources 2017, 340, 242. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.078
70. [70]
  Matsuda, Y.; Kuwata, N.; Kawamura, J. Solid State Ion. 2018, 320, 38. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2018.02.024
71. [71]
  Zhou, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, M.; Fang, Z.; Kong, T. Y.; Feng, W. L.; Xie, Y. H.; Wang, F.; Hu, B. W.; Wang, Y. G. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2103932. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202103932

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 27
文章访问数: 1177
HTML全文浏览量: 255

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

固态锂电池界面优化策略的研究进展

通讯作者: 刘金平, liujp@whut.edu.cn

English

Research Progress of Interface Optimization Strategies for Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Corresponding author: Jinping Liu, Email: liujp@whut.edu.cn

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

固态锂电池界面优化策略的研究进展

通讯作者: 刘金平, liujp@whut.edu.cn

English

Research Progress of Interface Optimization Strategies for Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Corresponding author: Jinping Liu, Email: liujp@whut.edu.cn

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs