English

Cobalt-Vanadium Layered Double Hydroxides Nanosheets as High-Performance Electrocatalysts for Urea Oxidation Reaction

• Yaoyu Liu ^1, ,
• Yuchen Wang ^{1, ,} ,
• Biying Liu ^1, ,
• Mahmoud Amer ^2, ,
• Kai Yan ^{1, ,}

• 1.

  School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

• 2.

  Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21544, Egypt

Corresponding author: Yuchen Wang, wangych235@mail.sysu.edu.cn Kai Yan, yank9@mail.sysu.edu.cn

• Received Date: 12 May 2022
  Accepted Date: 09 June 2022
  Revised Date: 06 June 2022
  Available Online: 15 February 2023
• Fund Project:

Abstract: Hydrogen is considered as a desirable clean energy source for supporting human life in the future. Electrochemical water splitting is a promising method for generating carbon-free hydrogen. However, the relatively high overpotential of anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is the main obstacle hindering the widespread popularity of water electrocatalysis technology. Recently, urea oxidation reaction (UOR) has gained significant attention as a potential alternative to OER for hydrogen production since the equilibrium potential of UOR is 0.86 V lower than that of OER. Transition metal-based layered double hydroxides (TM-LDHs) have been explored as promising UOR electrocatalysts, with the advantages of diversified metal species, stable two-dimensional layered structure and exchangeability of interlayer anions. To date, most studies have focused on TM-LDHs of late transition metals (e.g., Ni, Co, and Fe). In this work, by combining early and late transition metals, CoV-LDHs nanosheets were fabricated via a simple one-step coprecipitation method as high-performance UOR electrocatalysts. Additionally, cobalt hydroxide (Co(OH)₂), with a similar lamellar structure, was synthesized via the same method. When compared with Co(OH)₂, CoV-LDHs nanosheets exhibited better UOR performance owing to the following advantages: 1) The nanosheet structure of the as-fabricated CoV-LDHs electrocatalyst exposed a high number of active sites for the electrocatalytic conversion of urea. 2) The introduction of V enhanced the wettability of the CoV-LDHs electrocatalyst; thus, increasing its intrinsic electrocatalytic kinetics. 3) The d-electron compensation effect between Co (3d⁷4s²) and V (3d³4s²) was conducive to promoting the adsorption of urea. Therefore, the CoV-LDHs electrocatalyst exhibited a low electrochemical potential (1.52 V vs. the reversible hydrogen electrode, RHE) to achieve a current density of 10 mA∙cm⁻² in 1 mol∙L⁻¹ of potassium hydroxide containing 0.33 mol∙L⁻¹ urea, which was 70 mV less than that of Co(OH)₂. The Tafel slope value of the CoV-LDHs electrocatalyst (99.9 mV∙dec⁻¹) was lower than that of Co(OH)₂ (115.9 mV∙dec⁻¹), indicating faster UOR kinetics over the CoV-LDHs electrocatalyst. Furthermore, the CoV-LDHs electrocatalyst displayed high stability, with a negligible potential increase after a 10-h chronopotentiometry test by maintaining the current density of 10 mA∙cm⁻². In conclusion, the present work not only shows that the d-electron compensation effect between early and late transition metals could adjust the local electronic structure of TM-LDHs to improve the UOR efficiency, but also provides a feasible route to design dedicated nanostructured TM-LDHs as high-performance UOR electrocatalysts.

Key words:
• Urea oxidation
•  /  Layered double hydroxide
•  /  Nanosheet
•  /  d-Electron compensation
•  /  Wettability

• 1. [1]

     Lagadec, M. F.; Grimaud, A. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 1140. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-0788-3

  2. [2]

     Rausch, B.; Symes Mark, D.; Chisholm, G.; Cronin, L. Science 2014, 345, 1326. doi: 10.1126/science.1257443

  3. [3]

     He, Y.; Wang, T. L.; Zhang, M.; Wang, T. W.; Wu, L. F.; Zeng, L. Y.; Wang, X. P.; Boubeche, M.; Wang, S.; Yan, K.; et al. Small 2021, 17, 2006153. doi: 10.1002/smll.202006153

  4. [4]

     Yu, J.; Yu, F.; Yuen, M.-F.; Wang, C. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 9389. doi: 10.1039/D0TA11910E

  5. [5]

     徐冰妍, 张应, 皮业灿, 邵琪, 黄小青. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37, 2009074. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009074Xu, B. Y.; Zhang, Y.; Pi, Y. C.; Shao, Q.; Huang, X. Q. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37, 2009074. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009074

  6. [6]

     Zhu, B. J.; Liang, Z. B.; Zou, R. Q. Small 2020, 16, 1906133. doi: 10.1002/smll.201906133

  7. [7]

     Hu, S. A.; Tan, Y.; Feng, C. Q.; Wu, H. M.; Zhang, J. J.; Mei, H. J. Power Sources 2020, 453, 227872. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227872

  8. [8]

     Xie, J. F.; Qu, H. C.; Lei, F. G.; Peng, X.; Liu, W. W.; Gao, L.; Hao, P.; Cui, G. W.; Tang, B. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 16121. doi: 10.1039/C8TA05054F

  9. [9]

     Wang, Z. L.; Liu, W. J.; Hu, Y. M.; Guan, M.; Xu, L.; Li, H. P.; Bao, J.; Li, H. M. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2020, 272, 118959. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118959

  10. [10]

      Wang, K. L.; Hou, M. M.; Huang, W.; Cao, Q. H.; Zhao, Y. J.; Sun, X. J.; Ding, R.; Lin, W. W.; Liu, E. H.; Gao, P. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2022, 615, 309. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.151

  11. [11]

      Wang, Z. L.; Liu, W. J.; Bao, J.; Song, Y. J.; She, X. J.; Hua, Y. J.; Lv, G. A.; Yuan, J. J.; Li, H. M.; Xu, H. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 133100. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133100

  12. [12]

      Sun, H. C.; Zhang, W.; Li, J. G.; Li, Z. S.; Ao, X.; Xue, K. H.; Ostrikov, K. K.; Tang, J.; Wang, C. D. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2021, 284, 119740. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119740

  13. [13]

      Zhang, R.; Wei, Z. H.; Ye, G. Y.; Chen, G. J.; Miao, J. J.; Zhou, X. H.; Zhu, X. W.; Cao, X. Q.; Sun, X. N. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101758. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202101758

  14. [14]

      Cao, Q. H.; Yuan, Y. H.; Wang, K. L.; Huang, W.; Zhao, Y. J.; Sun, X. J.; Ding, R.; Lin, W. W.; Liu, E. H.; Gao, P. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2022, 618, 411. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.03.054

  15. [15]

      Ma, T. F.; Xu, W. W.; Li, B. R.; Chen, X.; Zhao, J. J.; Wan, S. S.; Jiang, K.; Zhang, S. X.; Wang, Z. F.; Tian, Z. Q.; et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 22740. doi: 10.1002/anie.202110355

  16. [16]

      Jakšić, M. M. J. Mol. Catal. 1986, 38, 161. doi: 10.1016/0304-5102(86)87056-0

  17. [17]

      Zhou, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y. Q.; Li, Z. H.; Shao, M. F. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2009743. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202009743

  18. [18]

      Gong, W. Z.; Wang, M. J.; An, Y.; Wang, J. L.; Zhou, L. X.; Xia, Y.; Wang, C. J.; Dong, K.; Pan, C.; Zhou, R. F. J. Energy Storage 2021, 38, 102579. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102579

  19. [19]

      Lee, S. C.; Kim, M.; Park, J.-H.; Kim, E. S.; Liu, S. D.; Chung, K. Y.; Seong, C. J. J. Power Sources 2021, 486, 229341. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229341

  20. [20]

      Wang, Y. C.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, M.; Liu, Y. Y.; Luo, H. X.; Yan, K. Green Energy Environ. 2022, 7, 1053. doi: 10.1016/j.gee.2021.01.019

  21. [21]

      Eisa, T.; Park, S.-G.; Mohamed, H. O.; Abdelkareem, M. A.; Lee, J.; Yang, E.; Castaño, P.; Chae, K.-J. Energy 2021, 228, 120584. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120584

  22. [22]

      Liu, J. Z.; Ji, Y. F.; Nai, J. W.; Niu, X. G.; Luo, Y.; Guo, L.; Yang, S. H. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 1736. doi: 10.1039/C8EE00611C

  23. [23]

      Huang, G. Q.; Zhao, L.; Yuan, S. S.; Li, N.; Jing, S. B. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 14767. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.02.223

  24. [24]

      Wang, Z. P.; Chen, L.; Xu, S. D.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, X. X.; Wu, X.; Xie, X. M.; Qiu, X. Y. Compos. Commun. 2021, 27, 100780. doi: 10.1016/j.coco.2021.100780

  25. [25]

      He, D. Y.; Cao, L. Y.; Huang, J. F.; Kajiyoshi, K.; Wu, J. P.; Wang, C. C.; Liu, Q. Q.; Yang, D.; Feng, L. L. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 47, 263. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.02.010

  26. [26]

      Li, C. F.; Xie, L. J.; Zhao, J. W.; Gu, L. F.; Wu, J. Q.; Li, G. R. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2022, 306, 121097. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121097

  27. [27]

      Zhang, B. J.; Pan, C. T.; Liu, H. J.; Wu, X. S.; Jiang, H. L.; Yang, L.; Qi, Z. M.; Li, G.; Shan, L.; Lin, Y. X.; et al. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 439, 135768. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135768

  28. [28]

      Geng, S. K.; Zheng, Y.; Li, S. Q.; Su, H.; Zhao, X.; Hu, J.; Shu, H. B.; Jaroniec, M.; Chen, P.; Liu, Q. H.; et al. Nat. Energy 2021, 6, 904. doi: 10.1038/s41560-021-00899-2

  29. [29]

      Chen, W.; Xu, L. T.; Zhu, X. R.; Huang, Y.-C.; Zhou, W.; Wang, D. D.; Zhou, Y. Y.; Du, S. Q.; Li, Q. L.; Xie, C.; et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 7297. doi: 10.1002/anie.202015773

  30. [30]

      Chen, W.; Xie, C.; Wang, Y. Y.; Zou, Y. Q.; Dong, C.-L.; Huang, Y.-C.; Xiao, Z. H.; Wei, Z. X.; Du, S. Q.; Chen, C.; et al. Chem 2020, 6, 2974. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.07.022

  31. [31]

      Ji, Z. J.; Song, Y. J.; Zhao, S. H.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Hu, W. P. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 569. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c05190

  32. [32]

      Yan, H. J.; Xie, Y.; Wu, A. P.; Cai, Z. C.; Wang, L.; Tian, C. G.; Zhang, X. M.; Fu, H. G. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1901174. doi: 10.1002/adma.201901174

  33. [33]

      Li, S. D.; Fan, J. C.; Li, S. Y.; Ma, Y.; Wu, J. H.; Jin, H. G.; Chao, Z. S.; Pan, D.; Guo, Z. H. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2021, 11, 735. doi: 10.1007/s40097-021-00441-6

  34. [34]

      Ge, J. H.; Liu, Z. F.; Guan, M. H.; Kuang, J.; Xiao, Y. H.; Yang, Y.; Tsang, C. H.; Lu, X. Y.; Yang, C. Z. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2022, 620, 442. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.03.152

  35. [35]

      Wei, S.; Wang, X. X.; Wang, J. M.; Sun, X. P.; Cui, L.; Yang, W. R.; Zheng, Y. W.; Liu, J. Q. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 246, 776. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.068

  36. [36]

      Hu, Q.; Zhu, B.; Li, G. M.; Liu, X. F.; Yang, H. P.; Sewell, C. D.; Zhang, Q. L.; Liu, J. H.; He, C. X.; Lin, Z. Q. Nano Energy 2019, 66, 104194. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104194

•