English

Cone Shaped Surface Array Structure on an Alkaline Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Improves Fuel Cell Performance

• Jingwen Zhang ^1, ,
• Hualong Ma ^1, ,
• Jun Ma ^1, ,
• Meixue Hu ^2, ,
• Qihao Li ^2, ,
• Sheng Chen ^2, ,
• Tianshu Ning ^2, ,
• Chuangxin Ge ^3, ,
• Xi Liu ^1, ,
• Li Xiao ^{2, 4,} ,
• Lin Zhuang ^{2, 3,} ,
• Yixiao Zhang ^{1, ,} ,
• Liwei Chen ^{1, ,}

• 1.

  School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, in-situ Center for Physical Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for Transformative Molecules, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

• 2.

  College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, Hubei Key Lab of Electrochemical Power Sources, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

• 3.

  The Institute for Advanced Studies, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

• 4.

  Sauvage Center for Molecular Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

Corresponding author: Email: yxzhang2019@sjtu.edu.cn (Y.Z.); Email: lwchen2018@sjtu.edu.cn (L.C.)

• Received Date: 29 November 2021
  Accepted Date: 30 December 2021
  Revised Date: 28 December 2021
  Available Online: 15 February 2023
• Fund Project:

  the National Natural Science Foundation of China 

  the National Natural Science Foundation of China 

Abstract: Fuel cells are essential energy conversion devices for future renewable energy structures. Mainstream proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) generally exhibit satisfactory performance despite requiring noble metal catalysts to be stable in acidic environments. Alkaline polymer electrolyte fuel cells (APEFCs), in contrast, offer the benefit of employing non-noble metal catalysts in fuel cells, but their overall performance and especially their long-term stability require further improvement. A critical component within APEFCs is the membrane electrode assembly (MEA), which comprises a hydroxide ion conductive polymer membrane, a cathode, and an anode (including a catalyst layer and a gas diffusion layer). MEA is where electrochemical reactions occur; thus, it plays a crucial role in determining fuel cell performance. Herein, the fabrication of a cone-shaped array on the surface of an alkaline polymer electrolyte membrane for improving the overall device performance is presented. The cone array was prepared using a sacrificial anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) template, and the array side of the polymer electrolyte was used as the cathode to construct the MEA, denoted as A-MEA. The control sample with no cone arrays on the polymer electrolyte surface is denoted as P-MEA. The Pt loadings on both the anode and cathode sides were approximately 0.2 mg∙cm⁻². APEFCs with A-MEA and P-MEA were separately assembled and tested in an 850e Fuel Cell Test System at a cell temperature of 80 ℃. Fully humidified hydrogen and oxygen were both supplied at a flow rate of 1000 mL·min⁻¹. The back pressure for both the anode and the cathode was 0.2 MPa. As a result, the APEFC with A-MEA exhibited a higher peak power density than that of the APEFC with P-MEA (1.48 vs. 1.04 W∙cm⁻²). The enhanced electrochemical performance of the APEFC with A-MEA was ascribed to the array-structured cathode, which improved the hydrophilicity of the polymer electrolyte membrane and increased the utilization efficiency of the catalyst. The hydrophilicity of the polymer electrolyte membrane with cone arrays was confirmed using contact angle measurements. The contact angles of the membranes with and without cone arrays were ~0° and 70.8°, respectively. The hydrophilic membrane promotes the electrode reaction at the cathode side. The electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) was also measured using cyclic voltammetry (CV) between 0.08 and 1 V (vs. reversible hydrogen electrode, RHE) at a scan rate of 20 mV∙s^-1, using fully humidified H₂ and N₂. A flow rate of 1000 mL∙min⁻¹ and back pressure of 0 MPa were employed. Results revealed that the ECSA of the cathode without the array was smaller than that of the array-structured cathode (21.17 vs. 24.89 m²∙g⁻¹), indicating that the array structure improved the catalyst utilization efficiency compared to that of the control sample. This study provides an effective strategy for the structural design and optimization of the MEAs in APEFCs.

Key words:
• Fuel cell
•  /  Alkaline polymer electrolyte membrane
•  /  Membrane electrode assembly
•  /  Cathode
•  /  Array structure

• 1. [1]

     Stern, P. C.; Sovacool, B. K.; Dietz, T. Nat. Clim. Change 2016, 6 (6), 547. doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE3027

  2. [2]

     Schrag, D. P. Elements 2007, 3 (3), 171. doi: 10.2113/gselements.3.3.171

  3. [3]

     Schultz, M. G.; Diehl, T.; Brasseur, G. P.; Zittel, W. Science 2003, 302 (5645), 624. doi: 10.1126/science.1089527

  4. [4]

     梁嘉顺, 刘轩, 李箐. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37 (9), 2010072. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010072Liang, J.; Liu, X.; Li, Q. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37 (9), 2010072. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010072

  5. [5]

     王健, 丁炜, 魏子栋. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37 (9), 2009094. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009094Wang, J.; Ding, W.; Wei, Z. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37 (9), 2009094. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009094

  6. [6]

     Ralph, T. R.; Hogarth, M. P. Platin Met. Rev. 2002, 46 (3), 117. doi: 10.3390/books978-3-03842-659-2

  7. [7]

     Hickner, M. A.; Herring, A. M.; Coughlin, E. B. J. Polym. Sci. Part Polym. Phys. 2013, 51 (24), 1727. doi: 10.1002/polb.23395

  8. [8]

     Mehta, V.; Cooper, J. S. J. Power Sources 2003, 114 (1), 32. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00542-6

  9. [9]

     韩爱娣, 闫晓晖, 陈俊任, 程晓静, 章俊良. 物理化学学报, 2022, 38 (3), 1912052. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201912052Han, A.; Yan, X.; Chen, J.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2022, 38 (3), 1912052. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201912052

  10. [10]

      丁亮, 唐堂, 胡劲松. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37 (9), 2010048. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010048Ding, L.; Tang, T.; Hu, J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37 (9), 2010048. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202010048

  11. [11]

      Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Hu, L.; Zhuang, L.; Lu, J.; Xu, B. Electrochem. Commun. 2003, 5 (8), 662. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2481(03)00148-6

  12. [12]

      薛延荣, 王兴栋, 张向前, 方锦杰, 许志远, 张宇烽, 刘雪瑞, 刘梦园, 朱威, 庄仲滨. 物理化学学报, 2021, 37 (9), 2009103. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009103Xue, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Fang, J.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, M.; Zhu, W.; Zhuang, Z. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2021, 37 (9), 2009103. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202009103

  13. [13]

      Huang, G.; Mandal, M.; Peng, X.; Yang-Neyerlin, A. C.; Pivovar, B. S.; Mustain, W. E.; Kohl, P. A. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166 (10), F637. doi: 10.1149/2.1301910jes

  14. [14]

      侯宏英. 物理化学学报, 2014, 30 (8), 1393. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201406171Hou, H. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2014, 30 (8), 1393. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201406171

  15. [15]

      Li, N.; Leng, Y.; Hickner, M. A.; Wang, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10124. doi: 10.1021/ja403671u

  16. [16]

      Wang, L.; Brink, J. J.; Varcoe, J. R. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 11771. doi: 10.1039/c7cc06392j

  17. [17]

      Chen, S.; Peng, H.; Hu, M.; Wang, G.; Xiao, L.; Lu, J.; Zhuang, L. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4 (5), 4297. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c00433

  18. [18]

      Peng, H.; Li, Q.; Hu, M.; Xiao, L.; Lu, J.; Zhuang, L. J. Power Sources 2018, 390, 165. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.047

  19. [19]

      Klingele, M.; Britton, B.; Breitwieser, M.; Vierrath, S.; Zengerle, R.; Holdcroft, S.; Thiele, S. Electrochem. Commun. 2016, 70, 65. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.06.017

  20. [20]

      Kim, K. H; Lee, K. Y.; Kim, H. J.; Cho, E. Lee, S. Y.; Lim T. H.; Yoon, S. P.; Hwang I. C.; Jang, J. H. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35 (5), 2119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.058

  21. [21]

      Debe, M. K. Nature 2012, 486 (7401), 43. doi: 10.1038/nature11115

  22. [22]

      Gottesfeld, S.; Dekel, D. R.; Page, M.; Page, M.; Bae, C. Yan, Y.; Zelenay, P.; Kim, Y. J. Power Sources 2018, 375, 170. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.010

  23. [23]

      张洁婧, 王宇新, 张建峰, 许莉. 物理化学学报, 2015, 31 (12), 2316. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20151022Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, L. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2015, 31 (12), 2316. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20151022

  24. [24]

      Liu, C. Y.; Sung, C. C. J. Power Sources 2012, 220, 348. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.090

  25. [25]

      Moreira, J.; Ocampo, A. L.; Sebastian, P. J.; Smit, M. A.; Salazar, M. D.; Angel, P. D.; Montoya, J. A.; Pérez, R.; Martínez, L. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2003, 28 (6), 625. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00143-X

  26. [26]

      Lobato, J.; Rodrigo, M. A.; Linares, J. J.; Scott, K. J. Power Sources 2002, 157 (2006), 284. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.07.040

  27. [27]

      Chen, M.; Wang, M.; Yang, Z.; Wang, X. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 406, 69. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.296

  28. [28]

      Wang, G.; Zou, L.; Huang, Q.; Zou, Z. Yang, H. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7 (16), 9447. doi: 10.1039/c8ta12382a

  29. [29]

      Zhang, W.; Minett, A. I.; Gao, M.; Zhao, J.; Razal, J. M.; Wallace, G. G.; Romeo, T.; Chen, J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1 (4), 671. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201100092

  30. [30]

      Zhang, C.; Yu, H.; Li, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Song, W.; Shao, Z.; Yi, B. ChemSusChem 2013, 6 (4), 659. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201200828

  31. [31]

      Ning, F.; Bai, C.; Qin, J.; Song, Y.; Zhang, T.; Chen, J.; Wei, J.; Lu, G.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; et al. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8 (11), 5489. doi: 10.1039/c9ta13666e

  32. [32]

      Dekel, D. R.; Rasion I, G.; Page, M.; Brandon, S. J. Power Sources 2018, 375, 191. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.012

  33. [33]

      Sheng, W.; Zhuang, Z.; Gao, M.; Zheng, J.; Chen, J.; Yan, Y. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6 (1), 1. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6848

  34. [34]

      Essalik, A.; Amouzegar, K.; Savadogo, O. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1995, 25, 404. doi: 10.1007/BF00249660

•