English

Charge Localization Induced by Nanopore Defects in Monolayer Black Phosphorus for Suppressing Nonradiative Electron-Hole Recombination through Time-Domain Simulation

• Haoran Lu ^1, ,
• Yaqing Wei ^{1, 2,} ,
• Run Long ^{1, 2, ,}

• 1.

  College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

• 2.

  Key Laboratory of Theoretical & Computational Photochemistry of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Corresponding author: Run Long, Email: runlong@bun.edu.cn; Tel.: +86-10-58806786

• Received Date: 24 June 2020
  Accepted Date: 25 July 2020
  Revised Date: 24 July 2020
  Available Online: 15 May 2022
• Fund Project:

  the National Natural Science Foundation of China 

Abstract: Black phosphorus (BP) is a promising candidate for photovoltaic and optoelectronic applications owing to its excellent electronic and optical properties. It is believed that defects generally accelerate non-radiative electron-hole recombination in BP and hinder improvement of device performance. Experiments defy this expectation. Using state-of-the-art ab initio time-dependent density functional theory combined with non-adiabatic molecular dynamics, we investigate the non-radiative electron-hole recombination in monolayer (MBP) and MBP containing nanopore defects (MBP-ND). We demonstrate that non-radiative electron-hole recombination is promoted by the P-P stretching vibrations, and the recombination time of MBP-ND is approximately 5.5 times longer than that of the MBP system. This is mainly attributed to the following three factors: First, the nanopore creates no mid-gap state when increasing the bandgap by 0.22 eV owing to the downshift of the valence band maximum, caused by the decrease in the inter-layer P-P bond length, thereby weakening the antibonding interaction. Second, the nanopore reduces the overlap of electron and hole wave functions by diminishing the charge densities near the defect. Simultaneously, the nanopore significantly inhibits the thermal-driven atomic fluctuations. The increased bandgap correlated with the decreased wave function overlap and slowed thermal motions of the nuclei in the MBP-ND system reduces the non-adiabatic coupling by a factor of approximately 2 with respect to the pristine system. Third, the slow atomic motions weaken the electron-vibrational interaction and decrease the intensity of the major vibration mode at 440 cm⁻¹, which is the main source for creating non-adiabatic coupling, leading to loss of coherence formed between a pair of electronic states via non-adiabatic coupling and causing electron-hole recombination that results in a 1.5-fold increase in the coherence time in the MBP-ND system with respect to the MBP system. Consequently, the increased bandgap and decreased non-adiabatic coupling compete successfully with the prolonged coherence time, extending the excited-state lifetime to 2.74 ns in the system containing nanopore defects, which is only 480 ps in the pristine system. These phenomena arise owing to a complex interplay of the unusual chemical, structural, electrostatic, and quantum properties of BP with and without nanopore defects. This study is of great significance for understanding the excited-state properties of BP. The detailed mechanistic understanding of the prolonged charge carriers lifetime of MBP decorated with nanopore defects provides key insights for defect engineering in BP and other 2-dimensional materials for a broad range of solar and electro-optic applications by reducing the non-radiative charge and energy losses.

Key words:
• Monolayer black phosphorus
•  /  Nanopore defect
•  /  Non-radiative electron-hole recombination
•  /  Time-dependent density functional theory
•  /  Non-adiabatic molecular dynamics

• 1. [1]

     Fuhrer, M.; Hone, J. Nat. Nanothchnol. 2013, 8, 146. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2013.30

  2. [2]

     Ma, N.; Jena, D. Phys. Rev. X 2014, 4, 011043. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011043

  3. [3]

     Xia, F.; Wang, H.; Jia, Y. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4458. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5458

  4. [4]

     Mao, N.; Wang, X.; Lin, Y.; Sumpter, B. G.; Ji, Q.; Palacios, T.; Huang, S.; Meunier, V.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Tisdale, W. A.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 4, 18994. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b07974

  5. [5]

     Qiao, J.; Kong, X.; Hu, Z. -X.; Yang, F.; Ji, W. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4475. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5475

  6. [6]

     Tran, V.; Soklaski, R.; Liang, Y. F.; Yang, L. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2014, 89, 235319. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.235319

  7. [7]

     Liang, L.; Wang, J.; Lin, W.; Sumpter, B. G.; Meunier, V.; Pan, M. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6400. doi: 10.1021/nl502892t

  8. [8]

     Li, L. K.; Yu, Y. J.; Ye, G. J. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 372. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.35

  9. [9]

     汤鹏, 肖坚坚, 郑超, 王石, 陈润锋. 物理化学学报, 2013, 29, 667. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201302062Tang, P.; Xiao, J. J.; Zheng, C.; Wang, S.; Chen, R. F. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2013, 29, 667. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201302062

  10. [10]

      Li, L.; Yang, F.; Ye, G. J.; Zhang, Z.; Lou, W.; Zhou, X.; Li, L.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Chang, K.; et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 593. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.42

  11. [11]

      Fei, R.; Yang, L. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2884. doi: 10.1021/nl500935z

  12. [12]

      Wang, X.; Lan, S. Adv. Opt. Photon. 2016, 8, 618. doi: 10.1364/aop.8.000618

  13. [13]

      Xu, Y.; Dai, J.; Zeng, X. C. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 1996. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00510

  14. [14]

      Fei, R.; Faghaninia, A.; Soklaski, R.; Yan, J. A.; Lo, C.; Yang, L. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6393. doi: 10.1021/nl502865s

  15. [15]

      Shockley, W.; Queisser, H. J. J. Appl. Phys. 1961, 32, 510. doi: 10.1063/1.1736034

  16. [16]

      He, J.; He, D.; Wang, Y.; Cui, Q.; Belllus, M. Z.; Chiu, H. -Y.; Zhao, H. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 6436. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b02104

  17. [17]

      Suess, R.; Jadidi, M. M.; Murphy, T. E.; Mittendorff, M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 081103. doi: 10.1063/1.4929403

  18. [18]

      Peymon, Z.; Wei, Y.; Frank, C.; Matthew Z. B.; Samuel, D. L.; Pan, S.; Long, R.; Zhao, H. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 11307. doi: 10.1039/C8NR02540A

  19. [19]

      Long, R.; Fang, W. H.; Alexey, V. A. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 653. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00001

  20. [20]

      Zhang, L.; Chu, W.; Zheng, Q.; Alexander, V. B.; Oleg, V. P.; Jin, Z. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 6151. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02620

  21. [21]

      Guo, H.; Chu, W.; Zheng, Q.; Zhao, J. J. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 4662. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01300

  22. [22]

      Cupo, A.; Das, P. M.; Chien, C. C.; Danda, G.; Kharche, N.; Tristant, D.; Drndic, M.; Meunier, V. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 7494. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b04031

  23. [23]

      Thomas, L. H. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 1927, 33, 542. doi: 10.1017/S0305004100011683

  24. [24]

      Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. Phys. Rev. 1965, 4A, 1133. doi: 10.1103/physrev.140.a1133

  25. [25]

      Long, R.; Oleg, V. P. ACS Nano 2015, 11, 11143. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b05843

  26. [26]

      Akimov, A. V.; Prezhdo, O. V. J. Chem. Theor. Comp. 2014, 10, 789. doi: 10.1021/ct400934c

  27. [27]

      Jaeger, H. M.; Fischer, S.; Prezhdo, O. V. J. Chem. Phys. 2012, 137, 22A545. doi: 10.1063/1.4757100

  28. [28]

      John, C. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 93, 1061. doi: 10.1063/1.459170

  29. [29]

      Prezhdo, O. V.; Rossky, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 5863. doi: 10.1063/1.474312

  30. [30]

      Akimov, A. V.; Prezhdo, O. V. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 4959. doi: 10.1021/ct400641n

  31. [31]

      Hammes-Schiffer, S.; John, C. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 4657. doi: 10.1063/1.467455

  32. [32]

      Li, L.; Long, R.; Bertolini, T.; Prezhdo, O. V. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 7962. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04374

  33. [33]

      Skinner, J. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1988, 39, 463. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pc.39.100188.002335

  34. [34]

      Kresse, G.; Furthmuller, J. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.54.11169

  35. [35]

      Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Phys. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

  36. [36]

      Blochl, P. E. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953

  37. [37]

      Monkhorst, H. J.; Pack, J. D. Phys. Rev. B 1976, 13, 5188. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188

  38. [38]

      Liu, H.; Neal, A. T.; Zhu, Z.; Luo, Z.; Xu, X.; Tomanek, D.; Ye, P. D. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4033. doi: 10.1021/nn501226z

  39. [39]

      Liu, Y.; Xu, F.; Zhang, Z.; Penev, E. S.; Yakobson, B. I. Nano Lett. 2012, 14, 6782. doi: 10.1021/nl5021393

  40. [40]

      Wang, X.; Jones, A. M.; Seyler, K. L.; Vy, T.; Jia, Y.; Zhao, H.; Wang, H.; Yang, L.; Xu, X.; Xia, F. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 517. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.71

  41. [41]

      Bray, A. J.; Moore, M. A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49, 1545. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1545

  42. [42]

      Prezhdo, O. V. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85, 4413. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4413

  43. [43]

      Prezhdo, O. V.; Rossky, P. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81, 5294. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5294

  44. [44]

      Englman, R.; Jortner, J. J. Lumin. 1970, 1, 134. doi: 10.1016/0022-2313(70)90029-3

  45. [45]

      Prezhdo, O. V.; Rossky, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 5863. doi: 10.1063/1.474312

•