English

Growing Iron Oxide Nanosheets on Highly Compressible Carbon Sponge for Enhanced Capacitive Performance

• Liang Xu ^1,2, ,
• Jia Yufeng ^2, ,
• Liu Zonghuai ^2, ,
• Lei Zhibin ^{2, ,}

• 1.

  School of Computer Science & Technology, Xi'an University of Posts Telecommunications, Xi'an 710121, P. R. China

• 2.

  School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, P. R. China

Corresponding author: Lei Zhibin, zblei@snnu.edu.cn

• Received Date: 15 March 2019
  Accepted Date: 22 May 2019
  Revised Date: 27 April 2019
  Available Online: 15 February 2020
• Fund Project:

  The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51772181)

Abstract: Compressible supercapacitor is a promising flexible energy storage device in view of its excellent capacitive performance, which is recoverable at different compression states. The compressible electrode constitutes the core component that largely determines the performance of a compressible supercapacitor. Commercial polymer sponges are highly compressible materials because most of them are composed of elastic and interconnected polyurethane fibers. However, polymer sponges cannot be directly used as supercapacitor electrodes due to their non-conductive polymer framework. In contrast, carbon sponge (CS) derived from melamine sponge has superior compressible property and exhibits substantially improved conductivity compared to commercial polymer sponge. However, the low specific surface area of CS leads to low specific capacitance, which severely limits its application as compressible supercapacitor electrodes. Currently, pseudocapacitive materials are grown on the conductive CS framework to form hybrid electrodes with improved specific capacitance. Among various pseudocapacitive electrode, iron oxides have attracted considerable attentions due to their natural abundance, high theoretical specific capacitance, and negative working potential. Moreover, the much higher specific capacitance than that of carbon electrodes makes iron oxides one of promising negative candidates for configuring an asymmetric supercapacitor. Herein we report the successful growth of α-Fe₂O₃ nanosheets on CS by electrodeposition followed by low-temperature thermal annealing. The α-Fe₂O₃ on CS displays typical nanosheet morphology with mass loading ranging from 3.4 to 6.7 mg·cm^-3 that can be facilely controlled by extending the deposition time from 4 to 16 h. The CS-Fe₂O₃ electrode retains 90% of its geometric height even after manual compression for 100 cycles. Moreover, the CS-Fe₂O₃ can withstand 60% strain even at Fe₂O₃ mass loading as high as 6.5 mg·cm^-3. The performance of the CS-Fe₂O₃ electrode at different strains was systematically investigated in 3.0 mol·L^-1 KOH aqueous electrolyte by cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge-discharge, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in a three-electrode system. Our results show that the CS-Fe₂O₃ composite electrode produces lower specific capacitance at lower strain. The EIS characterization and IR drop results indicate that this is due to the larger internal resistance arising from looser contact of electrode with the current collector and longer ion diffusion length. Particularly, the CS-Fe₂O₃-12 electrode delivers a maximum specific capacitance of 294 F·g^-1 at a current density of 1.0 A·g^-1, 1.7-times higher than that of CS substrate. Assuming that the specific capacitance of CS-Fe₂O₃-12 is derived from the double-layer capacitance of CS and the pseudocapacitance of Fe₂O₃, the capacitance of Fe₂O₃ nanosheets in the hybrid is calculated to be as high as 421 F·g^-1, much higher than most of recently reported results, showing that the sheet-like structure with more exposed active sites and short ion pathways could dramatically improve the utilization efficiency of the electrode for reversible faradaic reactions. More importantly, the CS-Fe₂O₃-12 electrode retains 87% of its initial capacitance after continuous charge-discharge at 5.0 A·g^-1 for 10000 cycles, showing promising application as a stable and compressible supercapacitor electrode.

Key words:
• Carbon sponge
•  /  Compressible electrode
•  /  Fe₂O₃ nanosheet
•  /  Capacitive performance

• 1. [1]

     Choi, J. H.; Lee, C.; Cho, S.; Moon, G. D.; Kim, B. S.; Chang, H.; Jang, H. D. Carbon 2018, 132, 16. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.105

  2. [2]

     Guan, C.; Zhao, W.; Hu, Y.; Ke, Q.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6 (20), 1601034. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201601034

  3. [3]

     吴中, 张新波.物理化学学报, 2017, 33 (2), 305. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201611012Wu, Z.; Zhang, X. B. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin.2017, 33 (2), 305. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201611012

  4. [4]

     Meng, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, C.; Cheng, H.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, G.; Qu, L. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25 (16), 2326. doi: 10.1002/adma.201300132

  5. [5]

     Lu, X.; Yu, M.; Wang, G.; Tong, Y.; Li, Y. Energy Environ. Sci.2014, 7 (7), 2160. doi: 10.1039/c4ee00960f

  6. [6]

     刘忠范.物理化学学报, 2016, 32 (4), 817. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201603152Liu, Z. F. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2016, 32(4), 817. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201603152

  7. [7]

     Yousaf, M.; Shi, H. T. H.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ma, Z.; Cao, A.; Naguib, H. E.; Han, R. P. S. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6 (17), 1600490. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201600490

  8. [8]

     Yu, H.; Zhang, W.; Li, T.; Zhi, L.; Dang, L.; Liu, Z.; Lei, Z. RSC Adv. 2017, 7 (2), 1067. doi: 10.1039/c6ra25899a

  9. [9]

     Niu, Z.; Zhou, W.; Chen, X.; Chen, J.; Xie, S. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27 (39), 6002. doi: 10.1002/adma.201502263

  10. [10]

      Yu, Y.; Zeng, J.; Chen, C.; Xie, Z.; Guo, R.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, X.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, Z. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26 (5), 810.doi: 10.1002/adma.201303662

  11. [11]

      Zhao, Y.; Liu, J.; Hu, Y.; Cheng, H.; Hu, C.; Jiang, C.; Jiang, L.; Cao, A.; Qu, L. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25 (4), 591. doi: 10.1002/adma.201203578

  12. [12]

      Xiao, K.; Ding, L. X.; Liu, G.; Chen, H.; Wang, S.; Wang, H. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (28), 5997. doi: 10.1002/adma.201601125

  13. [13]

      Liang, X.; Nie, K.; Ding, X.; Dang, L.; Sun, J.; Shi, F.; Xu, H.; Jiang, R.; He, X.; Liu, Z.; et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10 (12), 10087. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b19043

  14. [14]

      Cheng, P.; Li, T.; Yu, H.; Zhi, L.; Liu, Z.; Lei, Z. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120 (4), 2079. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11280

  15. [15]

      Lei, Z.; Sun, X.; Wang, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, X. S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5 (15), 7501. doi: 10.1021/am4018016

  16. [16]

      庄林.物理化学学报, 2017, 33 (5), 859. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201703141Zhuang, L. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2017, 33 (5), 859. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201703141

  17. [17]

      Li, Y.; Xu, J.; Feng, T.; Yao, Q.; Xie, J.; Xia, H. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27 (14), 1606728. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201606728

  18. [18]

      Chang, J.; Jin, M.; Yao, F.; Kim, T. H.; Le, V. T.; Yue, H.; Gunes, F.; Li, B.; Ghosh, A.; Xie, S.; et al. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23 (40), 5074. doi: 10.1002/adfm201301851

  19. [19]

      Lu, X.; Yu, M.; Zhai, T.; Wang, G.; Xie, S.; Liu, T.; Liang, C.; Tong, Y.; Li, Y. Nano Lett. 2013, 13 (6), 2628. doi: 10.1021/nl400760a

  20. [20]

      Owusu, K. A.; Qu, L.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, K.; Yang, C.; Hercule, K. M.; Lin, C.; Shi, C.; Wei, Q.; et al. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14264. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14264

  21. [21]

      Li, T.; Yu, H.; Zhi, L.; Zhang, W.; Dang, L.; Liu, Z.; Lei, Z. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121 (35), 18982. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04330

  22. [22]

      Li, T.; Zhang, W.; Zhi, L.; Yu, H.; Dang, L.; Shi, F.; Xu, H.; Hu, F.; Liu, Z.; Lei, Z.; Qiu, J. Nano Energy 2016, 30, 9.doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.023

  23. [23]

      Cheng, X.; Gui, X.; Lin, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhan, R.; Zhu, Y.; Tang, Z. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3 (42), 20927. doi: 10.1039/c5ta03635f

  24. [24]

      Gao, P.; Liu, R.; Huang, H.; Jia, X.; Pan, H. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (97), 94699. doi: 10.1039/c6ra21567j

  25. [25]

      Zheng, X.; Han, Z.; Yao, S.; Xiao, H.; Chai, F.; Qu, F.; Wu, X. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45 (16), 7094. doi: 10.1039/c6dt00002a

  26. [26]

      Wang, H.; Xu, Z.; Yi, H.; Wei, H.; Guo, Z.; Wang, X. Nano Energy 2014, 7, 86. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.04.009

  27. [27]

      Binitha, G.; Soumya, M. S.; Madhavan, A. A.; Praveen, P.; Balakrishnan, A.; Subramanian, K. R. V.; Reddy, M. V.; Nair, S. V.; Nair, A. S.; Sivakumar, N. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1 (38), 11698. doi: 10.1039/c3ta12352a

  28. [28]

      Zhao, P.; Li, W.; Wang, G.; Yu, B.; Li, X.; Bai, J.; Ren, Z. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 604, 87. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.03.106

  29. [29]

      Wang, Z.; Ma, C.; Wang, H.; Liu, Z.; Hao, Z. J. Alloys Compd.2013, 552, 486. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.11.071

  30. [30]

      Qin, K.; Liu, E.; Li, J.; Kang, J.; Shi, C.; He, C.; He, F.; Zhao, N. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6 (18), 1600755. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201600755

  31. [31]

      Zhang, Y.; Lin, R.; Fu, Y.; Wang, X.; Yu, X.; Li, J.; Zhu, Y.; Tan, S.; Wang, Z. Mater. Lett. 2018, 228, 9. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.05.073

  32. [32]

      Nagarajan, N.; Zhitomirsky, I. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2006, 36 (12), 1399. doi: 10.1007/s10800-006-9232-x

  33. [33]

      Quan, H.; Cheng, B.; Xiao, Y.; Lei, S. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 286, 165. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.068

  34. [34]

      Ma, Z.; Huang, X.; Dou, S.; Wu, J.; Wang, S. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118 (31), 17231. doi: 10.1021/jp502226j

•