English

Fabrication of Patterned Organic Semiconductor Thin Films by the Synergy of Marangoni and Coffee-Ring Effects

• WANG Ziang ^1, ,
• GUO Hang ^1, ,
• RONG Xin ^1, ,
• DONG Guifang ^{1,2, ,}

• 1.

  Key Lab of Organic Optoelectronics & Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P. R. China

• 2.

  Center for Flexible Electronics Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P. R. China

Corresponding author: DONG Guifang, Email: donggf@tsinghua.edu.cn; Tel.: +86-10-62782287

• Received Date: 23 January 2019
  Accepted Date: 12 March 2019
  Revised Date: 11 March 2019
  Available Online: 15 November 2019
• Fund Project:

  The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61890942) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFB0401103, 2017YFA0204501)

Abstract: Organic field effect transistors (OFETs) have great potential in flexible sensor and display driver applications. However, there are immense challenges in the development of large-area and high-quality thin-film fabrications. In this article, we introduce a method to fabricate patterned organic semiconductor films by oxygen plasma treatment and the synergy of Marangoni and coffee-ring effects. The procedure is as follows: First, we spin-coated the cyclic transparent amorphous fluoropolymers (CYTOP) on the substrate in the form of a hydrophobic layer. Then, parts of the substrate surface were treated with plasma and modified to make them hydrophilic. By comparing the water contact angle on the plasma treated surface with that on the untreated surface, we optimized the treating time to get a relatively uniform water contact angle on a different region of the substrate surface. The plasma treated substrate was dipped into 2, 7-dioctyl[1]benzothieno[3, 2-b][1]benzothiophene (C8-BTBT) solution with methylbenzene and carbon tetrachloride as a mixed solvent, and then lifted from it. So the mixed solution flowed down rapidly on the hydrophobic portion of the surface, leaving droplet on the hydrophilic portion. Subsequently, the droplet started evaporating under the synergy of Marangoni and coffee-ring effects. Based on the difference between the hydrophilic and hydrophobic portions on the substrate surface, we successfully obtained the patterned C8-BTBT thin films on the substrate. Furthermore, the solvent ratio was optimized while growing the C8-BTBT film to adjust the boiling point of the solution, which was due to a fully covered surface was obtained. From the grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) measurement of the films with three different concentrations, we observed that increasing in the concentration of the solution yielded different molecular orientations. Based on the three films, OFETs with bottom gate and top contact structure were fabricated. Moreover, the mobility and the on/off current ratio became more uniform with the progressive increase in the concentration of the solution. This may be attributed to the increase in the number of different molecular orientations and charge transfer channels. Although the increase in the number of different molecular orientations might lead to the decrease in mobility, it could improve the alignment of the electric field and also increase π–π stacking direction of the molecules, which promote highly uniform device performance distribution. Since uniform distribution of device performance is significant for practical applications, we believe the transistors that are fabricated at the highest concentration are better than those generated at lower concentrations. Thus, on the 5 cm × 5 cm substrate, it is observed that the average mobility of the transistors is 7.9 cm²·V^-1·s^-1, and all the devices have threshold voltages less than -2 V with the on/off current ratio of 10⁴. This work is significant for the fabrication of large-area and high-performance thin films and transistors.

Key words:
• Marangoni effect
•  /  C8-BTBT
•  /  Organic semiconductor
•  /  Field effect transistor
•  /  Patterned process

• 1. [1]

     李占国, 张玉婷, 谢强, 李亨利, 孙丽晶, 宋晓峰, 王丽娟.物理化学学报, 2016, 32 (4), 1005. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201601111Li, Z. G.; Zhang, Y. T.; Xie, Q.; Li, H. L.; Sun, L. J.; Song, X. F.; Wang, L. J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2016, 32 (4), 1005. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201601111

  2. [2]

     孙秋健, 董桂芳, 郑海洋, 赵昊岩, 乔娟, 段炼, 王立铎, 张复实, 邱勇.物理化学学报, 2011, 27 (8), 1893. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20110832Sun, Q. J.; Dong, G. F.; Zheng, H. Y.; Zhao, H. Y.; Qiao, J.; Duan, L.; Wang, L. D.; Zhang, F. S.; Qiu, Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2011, 27 (8), 1893. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20110832

  3. [3]

     吕乾睿, 李晶, 廉志鹏, 赵昊岩, 董桂芳, 李强, 王立铎, 严清峰.物理化学学报, 2017, 33 (1), 249. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201610142LÜ, Q. R.; Li, J.; Lian, Z. P.; Zhao, H. Y.; Dong, G. F.; Li, Q.; Wang, L. D.; Yan, Q. F. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33 (1), 249. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201610142

  4. [4]

     Cui, N.; Ren, H.; Tang, Q.; Zhao, X.; Tong, Y.; Hu, W.; Liu, Y. Nanoscale 2018, 10 (8), 3613. doi: 10.1039/c7nr09134f

  5. [5]

     Minemawari, H.; Yamada, T.; Matsui, H.; Tsutsumi, J.; Haas, S.; Chiba, R.; Kumai, R.; Hasegawa, T. Nature 2011, 475 (7356), 364. doi: 10.1038/nature10313

  6. [6]

     Zschieschang, U.; Klauk, H. Org. Electron. 2015, 25, 340. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.06.038

  7. [7]

     Zhang, Y.; Wei, X.; Zhang, H.; Chen, X.; Wang, J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 452. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.116

  8. [8]

     Diao, Y.; Tee, B. C.; Giri, G.; Xu, J.; Kim, D. H.; Becerril, H. A.; Stoltenberg, R. M.; Lee, T. H.; Xue, G.; Mannsfeld, S. C.; et al. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12 (7), 665. doi: 10.1038/nmat3650

  9. [9]

     Chai, Z.; Abbasi, S. A.; Busnaina, A. A. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10 (21), 18123. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b01433

  10. [10]

      Zhao, H.; Wang, Z.; Dong, G.; Duan, L. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17 (9), 6274. doi: 10.1039/c4cp05378h

  11. [11]

      Haase, K.; Teixeira da Rocha, C.; Hauenstein, C.; Zheng, Y.; Hambsch, M.; Mannsfeld, S. C. B. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2018, 4 (8), 1800076. doi: 10.1002/aelm.201800076

  12. [12]

      Yuan, Y.; Giri, G.; Ayzner, A. L.; Zoombelt, A. P.; Mannsfeld, S. C.; Chen, J.; Nordlund, D.; Toney, M. F.; Huang, J.; Bao, Z. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3005. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4005

  13. [13]

      Wang, Q.; Jiang, S.; Qian, J.; Song, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Shi, Y.; et al. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08280-8

  14. [14]

      Wang, Q.; Qian, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; He, D.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Pan, L.; Wang, J.; et al. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 3191. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201600304

  15. [15]

      Guo, Z.; Yu, P.; Sun, K.; Wang, W.; Wei Y.; Li, Z. Chem. Asian J. 2017, 12, 1104. doi: 10.1002/asia.201700271

  16. [16]

      Briseno, A. L.; Mannsfeld, S. C.; Ling, M. M.; Liu, S.; Tseng, R. J.; Reese, C.; Roberts, M. E.; Yang, Y.; Wudl, F.; Bao, Z. Nature 2006, 444 (7121), 913. doi: 10.1038/nature05427

  17. [17]

      Briseno, A. L.; Aizenberg, J.; Han, Y. J.; Penkala, R. A.; Moon, H.; Lovinger, A. J.; Kloc, C.; Bao, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127 (35), 12164. doi: 10.1021/ja052919u

  18. [18]

      Mannsfeld, S. C. B.; Sharei, A.; Liu, S.; Roberts, M. E.; McCulloch, I.; Heeney, M.; Bao, Z. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20 (21), 4044. doi: 10.1002/adma.200703244

  19. [19]

      Wang, C.; Dong, H.; Jiang, L.; Hu, W. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47 (2), 422. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00490g

  20. [20]

      Kumatani, A.; Liu, C.; Li, Y.; Darmawan, P.; Takimiya, K.; Minari, T.; Tsukagoshi, K. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 393. doi: 10.1038/srep00393

  21. [21]

      Yang, W.; Song, K.; Jung, Y.; Jeong, S.; Moon, J. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1 (27), 4275. doi: 10.1039/c3tc30550c

  22. [22]

      Branquinho, R.; Salgueiro, D.; Santos, L.; Barquinha, P.; Pereira, L.; Martins, R.; Fortunato, E. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6 (22), 19592. doi: 10.1021/am503872t

  23. [23]

      Choi, H. H.; Cho, K.; Frisbie, C. D.; Sirringhaus, H.; Podzorov, V. Nat. Mater. 2017, 17 (1), 2. doi: 10.1038/nmat5035

  24. [24]

      Chae, J. B.; Kwon, J. O.; Yang, J. S.; Kim, D.; Rhee, K.; Chung, S. K. Sen. Actuators A-Phys. 2014, 215, 8. doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2013.11.001

  25. [25]

      Deegan, R. D.; Bakajin, O.; Dupont, T. F.; Huber, G.; Nagel, S. R.; Witten, T. A. Nature 1997, 389 (6653), 827. doi: 10.1038/39827

  26. [26]

      Block, M. J. Nature 1956, 178 (4534), 650. doi: 10.1038/178650a0

  27. [27]

      de Gans, B. J.; Schubert, U. S. Langmuir 2004, 20 (18), 7789. doi: 10.1021/la049469o

  28. [28]

      Tang, C. B., Wu, W; Smilgies, D. M.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Kowalewski, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (30), 11802. doi: 10.1021/ja204724h

  29. [29]

      Uemura, T.; Hirose, Y.; Uno, M.; Takimiya, K.; Takeya, J. Appl. Phys. Express 2009, 2, 111501. doi: 10.1143/apex.2.111501

  30. [30]

      He, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Q.; Xu, R.; Nan, H.; Liu, J.; Yao, J.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, S.; Li, Y.; et al. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5162. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6162

•