过渡金属参与C―H键切断模式的理论研究进展

引用本文: 单春晖, 白若鹏, 蓝宇. 过渡金属参与C―H键切断模式的理论研究进展[J]. 物理化学学报, 2019, 35(9): 940-953. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201810052 shu

Citation: SHAN Chunhui, BAI Ruopeng, LAN Yu. Theoretical Advances of Transition Metals Mediated C―H Bonds Cleavage[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2019, 35(9): 940-953. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201810052 shu

过渡金属参与C―H键切断模式的理论研究进展

单春晖 ^{1,
,} ,
白若鹏 ^2, ,
蓝宇 ^{2,3,
,}

1.
重庆大学生物医学工程博士后流动站，重庆 4013312
2.
重庆大学化学化工学院与理论与计算化学重庆市重点实验室，重庆 401331
3.
郑州大学化学与分子工程学院，郑州 450001

作者简介: 单春晖，生于1985年。2017年在重庆大学获得博士学位，目前在重庆大学从事博士后研究。研究方向为过渡金属催化C―H键官能团化反应;

蓝宇，重庆大学化学化工学院教授， 1981年生。 2008年在北京大学获博士学位； 2009–2012年在美国UCLA从事博士后研究； 2012年4月加入重庆大学。研究方向为有机化学理论和理论有机化学;

通讯作者: 单春晖, chunhui.shan@cqu.edu.cn; 蓝宇, lanyu@cqu.edu.cn

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(21822303, 21772020), 中央高校基本科研业务费(2018CDXZ0002, 2018CDPTCG0001/4)与重庆市博士后科研项目(XmT2018085)资助

摘要: 过渡金属催化活化C―H键来构建新共价键因具有原子经济和合成简捷的特点，已成为合成化学中最为有效策略之一。本文中，我们总结了过渡金属参与的C―H键切断的理论研究进展，并系统性提出了C―H键切断的相关模式，包括：C―H键对金属的氧化加成、碱协助的去质子化、σ-复分解、Friedel-Crafts型亲电芳香取代、α-或β-氢消除以及夺氢活化等。理论计算表明，当使用还原性较强的零价金属催化剂时，反应可按照氧化加成模式进行。当使用金属羧酸盐作为催化剂时，通常以协同金属化-去质子化机理模式实现C―H键切断。当使用阳离子金属催化剂，富电子芳烃比缺电子芳烃优先反应时，C―H键切断则会经历碱协助的内部亲电取代模式。σ-复分解是协同金属化-去质子化机理的另一种模式。如果亲电体对芳烃进行加成时，则可按照Friedel-Crafts型亲电芳香取代方式活化C―H键。α-或β-氢消除也是比较常见的活化C―H键模式。此外，夺氢活化可通过自由基过程实现C―H键活化。本文通过对过渡金属参与的C―H键活化模式的论述旨在为实验提供理论指导。

关键词:

English

Theoretical Advances of Transition Metals Mediated C―H Bonds Cleavage

SHAN Chunhui ^{1,
,} ,
BAI Ruopeng ^2, ,
LAN Yu ^{2,3,
,}

1.
Postdoctoral Station of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, P. R. China
2.
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and Chongqing Key Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, P. R. China
3.
College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, P. R. China

Corresponding author: Emails: chunhui.shan@cqu.edu.cn (S.C.); lanyu@cqu.edu.cn (L.Y.). Tel.: +86-23-65678917 (L.Y.)

Received Date: 23 October 2018
Accepted Date: 21 November 2018
Revised Date: 17 November 2018
Available Online: 01 September 2019
Fund Project:

The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21822303, 21772020), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (Chongqing University) (2018CDXZ0002, 2018CDPTCG0001/4) and Chongqing Postdoctoral Science Special Foundation, China (XmT2018085)

Abstract: Transition-metal-catalyzed C―H bond activation, which has been widely applied to construct new covalent bonds, has emerged as one of the most effective strategies in synthetic chemistry due to atom economy and simple procedure. In this review, we have summarized the recent reports on the theoretical mechanistic study of transition-metal-catalyzed C―H bond cleavage. Based on these comprehensive theoretical studies, we have systematically discussed the general modes of C―H bond activation, which involves oxidative addition, base-assisted deprotonation, σ-metathesis, Friedel-Crafts-type electrophilic aromatic substitution, α- or β-hydrogen elimination, and hydrogen atom abstraction. From a mechanistic point of view, C―H bond activation by oxidative addition generally involves a zero-valent transition metal catalyst with strong reducibility, which requires a low activation barrier. The concerted metalation-deprotonation (CMD)-type C―H bond cleavage often occurs via a six-membered cyclic transition state using transition metal carboxylate as the catalyst with a directing group, which is a common mechanism for transition metals with high oxidation states. Base-assisted internal electrophilic substitution (BIES)-type C―H bond activation is commonly performed in the presence of cationic transition metal catalysts, in which electron-rich arenes react preferentially compared to electron-deficient arenes. In some other cases, outer-sphere base-assisted deprotonation can also result in C―H activation, which is dependent on the strength of the base used. The stronger the base used, the lower the energy barrier, and thus, the easier it is to protonate. The σ-metathesis pathway, which could occur via a four-membered cyclic transition state, is often considered an alternative for concerted metalation-deprotonation. If the aromatic hydrocarbon is attacked by electrophiles, the C―H bond can be activated by Friedel-Crafts-type electrophilic aromatic substitution. Elimination of α- or β-hydrogen is also frequently proposed for transition-metal-catalyzed C―H functionalization. Hydrogen atom abstraction could achieve C―H bond activation via a free radical process. Moreover, the C―H bonds of hydrocarbons can be considered weak nucleophiles because the electronegativity of carbon is higher than that of hydrogen, and they could be converted to strong nucleophiles (C-M) in the presence of transition metal catalysts via the different pathways mentioned above. It enables further functionalization with electrophiles or nucleophiles to construct complex molecular skeletons. Summarizing the general modes of C―H bond activation will increase our understanding of the associated chemical mechanism and will pave the way for new synthetic strategies. This review aims to offer theoretical guidance for experimental studies and inspire new reaction design by summarizing the modes of transition-metal-catalyzed C―H bond activation.

Key words:

1. [1]
  Ackermann, L. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1315. doi: 10.1021/cr100412j
2. [2]
  Cho, S. H.; Kim, J. Y.; Kwak, J.; Chang, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5068. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15082k
3. [3]
  Jiang, Y. -Y.; Man, X.; Bi, S. Sci. China-Chem. 2016, 59, 1448. doi: 10.1007/s11426-016-0330-3
4. [4]
  Liu, C.; Zhang, H.; Shi, W.; Lei, A. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1780. doi: 10.1021/cr100379j
5. [5]
  Rao, Y.; Shan, G.; Yang, X. Sci. China-Chem. 2014, 57, 930. doi: 10.1007/s11426-014-5130-y
6. [6]
  Shan, C.; Zhu, L.; Qu, L. B.; Bai, R.; Lan, Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 7552. doi: 10.1039/c8cs00036k
7. [7]
  Yu, J. L.; Zhang, S. Q.; Hong, X. J. Am. Chem.Soc. 2017, 139, 7224. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00714
8. [8]
  Yuan, C.; Zhu, L.; Chen, C.; Chen, X.; Yang, Y.; Lan, Y.; Zhao, Y. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1189. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03341-6
9. [9]
  Yuan, C.; Zhu, L.; Zeng, R.; Lan, Y.; Zhao, Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 1277. doi: 10.1002/anie.201711221
10. [10]
  Zhang, L.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Ma, W.; Lan, Y.; You, J. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 8324. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b02816
11. [11]
  Ackermann, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 281. doi: 10.1021/ar3002798
12. [12]
  Colby, D. A.; Bergman, R. G.; Ellman, J. A. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 624. doi: 10.1021/cr900005n
13. [13]
  Li, Y.; Liu, S.; Qi, Z.; Qi, X.; Li, X.; Lan, Y. Chem. -Eur. J. 2015, 21, 10131. doi: 10.1002/chem.201500290
14. [14]
  Qin, X.; Li, X.; Huang, Q.; Liu, H.; Wu, D.; Guo, Q.; Lan, J.; Wang, R.; You, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 7167. doi: 10.1002/anie.201501982
15. [15]
  Shin, K.; Kim, H.; Chang, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1040. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00020
16. [16]
  Song, G.; Li, X. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1007. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00077
17. [17]
  Yu, S.; Li, Y.; Kong, L.; Zhou, X.; Tang, G.; Lan, Y.; Li, X. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 7744. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02668
18. [18]
  Yu, S.; Liu, S.; Lan, Y.; Wan, B.; Li, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1623. doi: 10.1021/ja511796h
19. [19]
  Arroniz, C.; Denis, J. G.; Ironmonger, A.; Rassias, G.; Larrosa, I. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 3509. doi: 10.1039/c4sc01215a
20. [20]
  Arroniz, C.; Ironmonger, A.; Rassias, G.; Larrosa, I. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 910. doi: 10.1021/ol400065j
21. [21]
  Chiong, H. A.; Pham, Q. N.; Daugulis, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9879. doi: 10.1021/ja071845e
22. [22]
  Engle, K. M.; Mei, T. S.; Wasa, M.; Yu, J. Q. Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 788. doi: 10.1021/ar200185g
23. [23]
  Giri, R.; Maugel, N.; Li, J. J.; Wang, D. H.; Breazzano, S. P.; Saunders, L. B.; Yu, J. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3510. doi: 10.1021/ja0701614
24. [24]
  He, J.; Wasa, M.; Chan, K. S. L.; Shao, Q.; Yu, J. Q. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8754. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00622
25. [25]
  Wang, D. H.; Mei, T. S.; Yu, J. Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17676. doi: 10.1021/ja806681z
26. [26]
  Zhang, H.; Wang, H.-Y.; Luo, Y.; Chen, C.; Cao, Y.; Chen, P.; Guo, Y. -L.; Lan, Y.; Liu, G. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 2173. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b03220
27. [27]
  Zhu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Kan, J.; Zhao, H.; Su, W. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 3418. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b01398
28. [28]
  Shi, R.; Lu, L.; Xie, H.; Yan, J.; Xu, T.; Zhang, H.; Qi, X.; Lan, Y.; Lei, A. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 13307. doi: 10.1039/c6cc06358f
29. [29]
  Song, L.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Ye, J. H.; Yan, S. S.; Han, J. L.; Yin, Z. B.; Lan, Y.; Yu, D. G. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3776. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01363
30. [30]
  Zhu, R. -Y.; Farmer, M. E.; Chen, Y. -Q.; Yu, J. -Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 10578. doi: 10.1002/anie.201600791
31. [31]
  Musaev, D. G.; Figg, T. M.; Kaledin, A. L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5009. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60447k
32. [32]
  Xie, H.; Fan, T.; Lei, Q.; Fang, W. Sci. Chin. Chem. 2016, 59, 1432. doi: 10.1007/s11426-016-0018-2
33. [33]
  Xie, H.; Zhang, H.; Lin, Z. New J. Chem. 2013, 37, 2856. doi: 10.1039/c3nj00531c
34. [34]
  Liu, D.; Li, Y.; Qi, X.; Liu, C.; Lan, Y.; Lei, A. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 998. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00104
35. [35]
  Aihara, Y.; Chatani, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 898. doi: 10.1021/ja411715v
36. [36]
  Heitz, D. R.; Tellis, J. C.; Molander, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12715. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04789
37. [37]
  Muto, K.; Yamaguchi, J.; Itami, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 169. doi: 10.1021/ja210249h
38. [38]
  Yamamoto, T.; Muto, K.; Komiyama, M.; Canivet, J.; Yamaguchi, J.; Itami, K. Chem. -Eur. J. 2011, 17, 10113. doi: 10.1002/chem.201101091
39. [39]
  Yokota, A.; Aihara, Y.; Chatani, N. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 11922. doi: 10.1021/jo501697n
40. [40]
  Liu, R. R.; Zhu, L.; Hu, J. P.; Lu, C. J.; Gao, J. R.; Lan, Y.; Jia, Y. X. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 5890. doi: 10.1039/c7cc01015j
41. [41]
  Zeng, Z.; Zhang, T.; Yue, X.; Zhang, H.; Bai, R.; Lan, Y. Sci. Sin. Chim. 2018, 48, 736. doi: 10.1360/N032018-00105
42. [42]
  Murai, S.; Kakiuchi, F.; Sekine, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Kamatani, A.; Sonoda, M.; Chatani, N. Nature 1993, 366, 529. doi: 10.1038/366529a0
43. [43]
  Ackermann, L. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 4866. doi: 10.1039/c0cc00778a
44. [44]
  Ackermann, L.; Hofmann, N.; Vicente, R. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1875. doi: 10.1021/ol200366n
45. [45]
  Ackermann, L.; Vicente, R.; Althammer, A. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2299. doi: 10.1021/ol800773x
46. [46]
  Fumagalli, F.; Warratz, S.; Zhang, S. K.; Rogge, T.; Zhu, C.; Stuckl, A. C.; Ackermann, L. Chem. -Eur. J. 2018, 24, 3984. doi: 10.1002/chem.201800530
47. [47]
  Liu, W.; Ackermann, L. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3484. doi: 10.1021/ol401535k
48. [48]
  Warratz, S.; Burns, D. J.; Zhu, C.; Korvorapun, K.; Rogge, T.; Scholz, J.; Jooss, C.; Gelman, D.; Ackermann, L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1557. doi: 10.1002/anie.201609014
49. [49]
  Ferrer Flegeau, E.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P. H.; Jutand, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10161. doi: 10.1021/ja201462n
50. [50]
  Ozdemir, I.; Demir, S.; Cetinkaya, B.; Gourlaouen, C.; Maseras, F.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1156. doi: 10.1021/ja710276x
51. [51]
  Ryabov, A. D.; Sakodinskaya, I. K.; Yatsimirsky, A. K. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1985, 2629. doi: 10.1039/dt9850002629
52. [52]
  Kurzeev, S. A.; Kazankov, G. M.; Ryabov, A. D. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2002, 340, 192. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1693[02] 01148-9
53. [53]
  Oxgaard, J.; Tenn, W. J.; Nielsen, R. J.; Periana, R. A.; Goddard, W. A. Organometallics 2007, 26, 1565. doi: 10.1021/om061189b
54. [54]
  Balcells, D.; Clot, E.; Eisenstein, O. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 749. doi: 10.1021/cr900315k
55. [55]
  Wenz, K. M.; Liu, P.; Houk, K. N. Organometallics 2017, 36, 3613. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00531
56. [56]
  Xi, Y.; Su, Y.; Yu, Z.; Dong, B.; McClain, E. J.; Lan, Y.; Shi, X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9817. doi: 10.1002/anie.201404946
57. [57]
  Shi, F. Q. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 736. doi: 10.1021/ol102974k
58. [58]
  Cho, K. B.; Kang, H.; Woo, J.; Park, Y. J.; Seo, M. S.; Cho, J.; Nam, W. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 645. doi: 10.1021/ic402831f
59. [59]
  Sun, X.; Sun, X.; Geng, C.; Zhao, H.; Li, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 7146. doi: 10.1021/jp505662x
60. [60]
  Tamura, H.; Yamazaki, H.; Sato, H.; Sakaki, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16114. doi: 10.1021/ja0302937
61. [61]
  Zhu, L.; Qi, X.; Li, Y.; Duan, M.; Zou, L.; Bai, R.; Lan, Y. Organometallics 2017, 36, 2107. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00151
62. [62]
  Murphy, S. K.; Park, J. W.; Cruz, F. A.; Dong, V. M. Science 2015, 347, 56. doi: 10.1126/science.1261232
63. [63]
  Luo, X.; Bai, R.; Liu, S.; Shan, C.; Chen, C.; Lan, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 2320. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b02828
64. [64]
  Gorelsky, S. I.; Lapointe, D.; Fagnou, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10848. doi: 10.1021/ja802533u
65. [65]
  Wang, Q.; Li, Y.; Qi, Z.; Xie, F.; Lan, Y.; Li, X. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 1971. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b02297
66. [66]
  Yu, S.; Tang, G.; Li, Y.; Zhou, X.; Lan, Y.; Li, X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 8696. doi: 10.1002/anie.201602224
67. [67]
  Dateer, R. B.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4908. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b01065
68. [68]
  Li, Y.; Shan, C.; Yang, Y. F.; Shi, F.; Qi, X.; Houk, K. N.; Lan, Y. J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 121, 4496. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b01020
69. [69]
  Liu, S.; Qi, X.; Qu, L. -B.; Bai, R.; Lan, Y. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 1645. doi: 10.1039/c7cy02367g
70. [70]
  Luo, Y.; Liu, S.; Xu, D.; Qu, L. -B.; Luo, X.; Bai, R.; Lan, Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 864, 148. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2018.03.016
71. [71]
  Tan, G.; Zhu, L.; Liao, X.; Lan, Y.; You, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 15724. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b07242
72. [72]
  Yang, X.; Liu, S.; Yu, S.; Kong, L.; Lan, Y.; Li, X. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 2698. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b00906
73. [73]
  Yin, J.; Zhou, F.; Zhu, L.; Yang, M.; Lan, Y.; You, J. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 5488. doi: 10.1039/c8sc01963k
74. [74]
  Zhang, T.; Qi, X.; Liu, S.; Bai, R.; Liu, C.; Lan, Y. Chem. -Eur. J. 2017, 23, 2690. doi: 10.1002/chem.201605188
75. [75]
  Qi, X.; Li, Y.; Bai, R.; Lan, Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 2799. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00400
76. [76]
  Gao, B.; Liu, S.; Lan, Y.; Huang, H. Organometallics 2016, 35, 1480. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.6b00072
77. [77]
  Shan, C.; Luo, X.; Qi, X.; Liu, S.; Li, Y.; Lan, Y. Organometallics 2016, 35, 1440. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.6b00064
78. [78]
  Zhou, X.; Luo, Y.; Kong, L.; Xu, Y.; Zheng, G.; Lan, Y.; Li, X. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 7296. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b02248
79. [79]
  Li, Y.; Zou, L.; Bai, R.; Lan, Y. Org. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 615. doi: 10.1039/c7qo00850c
80. [80]
  Zell, D.; Bursch, M.; Muller, V.; Grimme, S.; Ackermann, L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10378. doi: 10.1002/anie.201704196
81. [81]
  Bu, Q.; Rogge, T.; Kotek, V.; Ackermann, L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 765. doi: 10.1002/anie.201711108
82. [82]
  Yue, X.; Qi, X.; Bai, R.; Lei, A.; Lan, Y. Chem. -Eur. J. 2017, 23, 6419. doi: 10.1002/chem.201700733
83. [83]
  Lin, Y.; Zhu, L.; Lan, Y.; Rao, Y. Chem. -Eur. J. 2015, 21, 14937. doi: 10.1002/chem.201502140
84. [84]
  Ahmad, K.; Khan, B. A.; Roy, S. K.; Zai-ul, A.; Mahmood, R.; Khan, J.; Ashraf, H. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2018, 1130, 140. doi: 10.1016/j.comptc.2018.03.025
85. [85]
  Clot, E.; Chen, J.; Lee, D. H.; Sung, S. Y.; Appelhans, L. N.; Faller, J. W.; Crabtree, R. H.; Eisenstein, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8795. doi: 10.1021/ja048473j
86. [86]
  Chen, Z. M.; Hilton, M. J.; Sigman, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 11461. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b06994
87. [87]
  Werner, E. W.; Mei, T. S.; Burckle, A. J.; Sigman, M. S. Science 2012, 338, 1455. doi: 10.1126/science.1229208
88. [88]
  Xu, L.; Hilton, M. J.; Zhang, X.; Norrby, P. O.; Wu, Y. D.; Sigman, M. S.; Wiest, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1960. doi: 10.1021/ja4109616
89. [89]
  Limberg, C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5932. doi: 10.1002/anie.200300578
90. [90]
  Che, C. M.; Lo, V. K.; Zhou, C. Y.; Huang, J. S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 1950. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00142b
91. [91]
  Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15525. doi: 10.1021/ja509731z
92. [92]
  Hu, L.; Chen, H. ACS Catal. 2016, 7, 285. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b02694
93. [93]
  Maurice, D.; Head-Gordon, M. Mol. Phys. 1999, 96, 1533. doi: 10.1080/00268979909483096
94. [94]
  Head-Gordon, M.; Rico, R. J.; Oumi, M.; Lee, T. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 219, 21. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614[94] 00070-0
95. [95]
  Purvis, G. D.; Bartlett, R. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 1910. doi: 10.1063/1.443164
96. [96]
  Krishnan, R.; Pople, J. A. Int. J.Quantum Chem. 1978, 14, 91. doi: 10.1002/qua.560140109
97. [97]
  Van Voorhis, T.; Head-Gordon, M. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 5033. doi: 10.1063/1.1390516
98. [98]
  Meyer, H. D.; Manthe, U.; Cederbaum, L. S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 165, 73. doi: 10.1016/0009-2614[90] 87014-i
99. [99]
  M ller, C.; Plesset, M. S. Phys. Rev. 1934, 46, 618. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.46.618
100. [100]
  Grimme, S. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1463. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20078
101. [101]
  Zhao, Y.; Schultz, N. E.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2006, 2, 364. doi: 10.1021/ct0502763
102. [102]
  Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. doi: 10.1063/1.464913
103. [103]
  Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785
104. [104]
  Goerigk, L.; Grimme, S. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 291. doi: 10.1021/ct100466k
105. [105]
  Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104. doi: 10.1063/1.3382344
106. [106]
  Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 119, 525. doi: 10.1007/s00214-007-0401-8
107. [107]
  Peverati, R.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 3, 117. doi: 10.1021/jz201525m
108. [108]
  Peverati, R.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 2310. doi: 10.1021/ct3002656
109. [109]
  Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 5656. doi: 10.1021/jp050536c

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 22
文章访问数: 1731
HTML全文浏览量: 313

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

过渡金属参与C―H键切断模式的理论研究进展

通讯作者: 单春晖, chunhui.shan@cqu.edu.cn; 蓝宇, lanyu@cqu.edu.cn

English

Theoretical Advances of Transition Metals Mediated C―H Bonds Cleavage

Corresponding author: Emails: chunhui.shan@cqu.edu.cn (S.C.); lanyu@cqu.edu.cn (L.Y.). Tel.: +86-23-65678917 (L.Y.)

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

过渡金属参与C―H键切断模式的理论研究进展

通讯作者: 单春晖, chunhui.shan@cqu.edu.cn; 蓝宇, lanyu@cqu.edu.cn

English

Theoretical Advances of Transition Metals Mediated C―H Bonds Cleavage

Corresponding author: Emails: chunhui.shan@cqu.edu.cn (S.C.); lanyu@cqu.edu.cn (L.Y.). Tel.: +86-23-65678917 (L.Y.)

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs