English

One-Pot Surfactant-Free Synthesis of Transition Metal/ZnO Nanocomposites for Catalytic Hydrogenation of CO₂ to Methanol

• LIU Yanfang ,
• HU Bing ,
• YIN Yazhi ,
• LIU Guoliang ^, ,
• HONG Xinlin ^,

• College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, P. R. China

Corresponding author: LIU Guoliang, liugl@whu.edu.cn HONG Xinlin, hongxl@whu.edu.cn

• Received Date: 29 December 2017
  Accepted Date: 06 February 2018
  Revised Date: 02 February 2018
  Available Online: 15 February 2019
• Fund Project:

  This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21373153)

Abstract: Catalytic hydrogenation of CO₂ to methanol is an important chemical process owing to its contribution in alleviating the impacts of the greenhouse effect and in realizing the requirement for renewable energy sources. Owing to their excellent synergic functionalities and unique optoelectronic as well as catalytic properties, transition metal/ZnO (M/ZnO) nanocomposites have been widely used as catalysts for this reaction in recent years. Development of size-controlled synthesis of metal/oxide complexes is highly desirable. Further, because it is extremely difficult to achieve the strong-metal-support-interaction (SMSI) effect when the M/ZnO nanocomposites are prepared via physical methods, the use of chemical methods is more favorable for the fabrication of multi-component catalysts. However, because of the requirement for an extra H₂ reduction step to obtain the active metallic phase (M) and surfactants to control the size of nanoparticles, most M/ZnO nanocomposites undergo two- or multi-step synthesis, which is disadvantageous for the stable catalytic performance of the M/ZnO nanocomposites. In this work, we demonstrate facile one-pot synthesis of M/ZnO (M = Pd, Au, Ag, and Cu) nanocomposites in refluxed ethylene glycol as a solvent, without using any surfactants. During the synthesis process, Pd and ZnO species can stabilize each other from further aggregation by reducing their individual surface energies, thereby achieving size control of particles. Besides, NaHCO₃ serves as a size-control tool for Pd nanoparticles by adjusting the alkaline conditions. Ethylene glycol serves as a mild reducing agent and solvent owing to its capacity to reduce Pd ions to generate Pd crystals. The nucleation and growth of Pd particles are achieved by thermal reduction, while the ZnO nanocrystals are formed by thermal decomposition of Zn(OAc)₂. X-ray diffraction patterns of the M/ZnO and ZnO were analyzed to study the phase of the nanocomposites, and the results show that no impurity phase was detected. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to study the morphology and structural properties. In addition, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis was performed to further confirm the formation of M/ZnO hybrid materials, and the results confirm SMSI between Pd and ZnO. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was used to check the actual elemental compositions, and the results show that the detected atomic ratios of Pd/Zn were consistent with the values in the theoretical recipe. To investigate the effects of the Pd/Zn molar ratios and the added amount of NaHCO₃ on Pd size, the average sizes of Pd particles were calculated, and the results were confirmed by TEM observation. The Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ composite is a widely known catalyst for hydrogenation of CO₂ to methanol, and other M/ZnO composites are also catalytic for this reaction. Therefore, different M/ZnO hybrids were further studied as catalysts for hydrogenation of CO₂ to methanol, among which Pd/ZnO (1 : 9) demonstrated the best performance (30% CO₂ conversion, 69% methanol selectivity, and 421.9 g_methanol·(kg catalyst·h)^-1 at 240 ℃ and 5 MPa. The outstanding catalytic performance may be explained by the following two factors: first, Pd is a good catalyst for the dissociation of H₂ to give active H atoms, and second, SMSI between Pd and ZnO favors the formation of surface oxygen vacancies on ZnO. Moreover, most M/ZnO composites exhibit excellent performance in methanol selectivity, especially the Au/ZnO catalyst, which has the highest methanol selectivity (82%) despite having the lowest CO₂ conversion. Hopefully, this work would provide a simple route for synthesis of M/ZnO nanocomposites with clean surfaces for catalysis.

Key words:
• Metal/ZnO
•  /  Hydrogenation
•  /  CO₂
•  /  Methanol
•  /  Nanocomposites

• 1. [1]

     Lewis, S. A.; Wilburn, J. P.; Wellons, M. S.; Cliffel, D. E.; Lukehart, C. M. Phys. Status Solidi A 2015, 212, 2903. doi: 10.1002/pssa.201532256

  2. [2]

     陈阳, 杨晓燕, 张鹏, 刘道胜, 桂建舟, 彭海龙, 刘丹.物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 2082. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201705176Chen, Y.; Yang, X. Y.; Zhang, P.; Liu, D. S.; Gui, J. Z.; Peng, H. L.; Liu, D. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 2082. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201705176

  3. [3]

     Xu, B. Q.; Wei, J. M.; Yu, Y. T.; Li, Y.; Li, J. L.; Zhu, Q. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5203. doi: 10.1023/A:1021419929938

  4. [4]

     王野.物理化学学报, 2017, 33, 857. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201703172Wang, Y. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2017, 33, 857. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201703172

  5. [5]

     Rathi, A. K.; Gawande, M. B.; Ranc, V.; Pechousek, J.; Petr, M.; Cepe, K.; Varmab, R. S.; Zboril, R. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 152. doi: 10.1039/C5CY00956A

  6. [6]

     Nadagouda, M. N.; Varma, R. S. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 2762. doi: 10.1021/bm700446p

  7. [7]

     Zhang, J.; Yu, J. G.; Jaroniec, M.; Gong, J. R. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4584. doi: 10.1021/nl301831h

  8. [8]

     Liu, T. X.; Li, B. X.; Hao, Y. G.; Han, F.; Zhang, L. L.; Hu, L. Y. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2015, 165, 378. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.041

  9. [9]

     Wang, D. H.; Kou, R.; Choi, D.; Yang, Z. G.; Nie, Z. M.; Li, J.; Saraf, L. V.; Hu, D. H.; Zhang, J. G.; Graff, G. L.; et al. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1587. doi: 10.1021/nn901819n

  10. [10]

      Polarz, S.; Neues, F.; van den Berg, M. W. E.; Grunert, W.; Khodeir, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12028. doi: 10.1021/ja0516514

  11. [11]

      Behrens, M.; Studt, F.; Kasatkin, I.; Kühl, S.; H vecker, M.; Abild-Pedersen, F.; Zander, S.; Girgsdies, F.; Kurr, P.; Kniep, B.; et al. Science 2012, 336, 893. doi: 10.1126/science.1219831

  12. [12]

      Ma, J.; Sun, N.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, N.; Xiao, F.; Wei, W.; Sun, Y. Catal. Today 2009, 148, 221. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2009.08.015

  13. [13]

      Wang, G. Y.; Zhang, W. X.; Lian, H. L.; Jiang, D. Z.; Wu, T. H. Appl. Catal. A 2003, 239, 1. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00098-4

  14. [14]

      Da Costa-Serra, J. F.; Guil-López, R.; Chica, A. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 6709. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.013

  15. [15]

      Huang, L.; Kramer, G. J.; Wieldraaijer, W.; Brands, D. S.; Poels, E. K.; Castricum, H. L.; Bakker, H. Catal. Lett. 1997, 48, 55. doi: 10.1023/A:1019014701674

  16. [16]

      Murray, C. B.; Norris, D. J.; Bawendi, M. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8706. doi: 10.1021/ja00072a025

  17. [17]

      Sun, S. H.; Murray, C. B.; Weller, D.; Folks, L.; Moser, A. Science 2000, 287, 1989. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5460.1989

  18. [18]

      Chen, S. F.; Li, J. P.; Qian, K.; Xu, W. P.; Lu, Y.; Huang, W. X.; Yu, S. H. Nano Res. 2010, 3, 244. doi: 10.1007/s12274-010-1027-z

  19. [19]

      Zhang, H. Y.; Xie, Y.; Sun, Z. Y.; Tao, R. T.; Huang, C. L.; Zhao, Y. F.; Liu, Z. M. Langmuir 2011, 27, 1152. doi: 10.1021/la1034728

  20. [20]

      Xie, Y.; Ding, K. L.; Liu, Z. M.; Tao, R. T.; Sun, Z. Y.; Zhang, H. Y.; An, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6648. doi: 10.1021/ja900447d

  21. [21]

      Wang, Y.; Ren, J. W.; Deng, K.; Gui, L. L.; Tang, Y. Q. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 1622. doi: 10.1002/chin.200041202

  22. [22]

      Fu, X. Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, N. Z.; Gui, L. L.; Tang, Y. Q. J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13, 1192. doi: 10.1039/B211747A

  23. [23]

      Zhang, J. L.; Ji, H.; Wei, Y. G.; Wang, Y.; Wu, N. Z. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 10688. doi: 10.1021/jp8003294

  24. [24]

      Chen, X. M.; Wu, G. H.; Chen, J. M.; Chen, X.; Xie, Z. X.; Wang, X. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3693. doi: 10.1021/ja110313d

  25. [25]

      Sun, Y. G.; Gates, B.; Mayers, B.; Xia, Y. N. Nano Lett. 2002, 2, 165. doi: 10.1021/nl010093y

  26. [26]

      Ranjbar, M., Taher, M.A.; Sam, A. J. Clust. Sci. 2014, 25, 1657. doi: 10.1007/s10876-014-0764-7

  27. [27]

      Zhang, J.; Mo, Y.; Vukmirovic, M. B.; Klie, R.; Sasaki, K.; Adzic, R. R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 10955. doi: 10.1021/jp0379953

  28. [28]

      Jing, L. Q.; Xu, Z. L.; Sun, X. J.; Shang, J.; Cai, W. M. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2001, 180, 308. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4332(01)00365-8

  29. [29]

      Batista, J.; Pintar, A.; Mandrino, D.; Jenko, M.; Martin, V. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2001, 206, 113. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00589-5

  30. [30]

      Matthey, D.; Wang, J. G.; Wendt, S.; Matthiesen, J.; Schaub, R.; Laegsgaard, E.; Hammer, B.; Besenbacher, F. Science 2007, 315, 1692. doi: 10.1126/science.1135752

  31. [31]

      Qiao, B. T.; Wang, A.Q.; Yang, X. F.; Allard, L. F.; Jiang, Z.; Cui, Y. T.; Liu, J. Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, T. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 634. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1095

  32. [32]

      Bock, C.; Paquet, C.; Couillard, M.; Botton, G. A.; MacDougall, B. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8028. doi: 10.1021/ja0495819

  33. [33]

      Chinchen, G. C.; Denny, P. J.; Jennings, J. R.; Spencer, M. S.; Waugh, K. C. Appl. Catal. 1988, 36, 1. doi: 10.1016/S0166-9834(00)80103-7

  34. [34]

      Liang, X. L.; Dong, X.; Lin, G. D.; Zhang, H. B. Appl. Catal. B- Environ. 2009, 88, 315. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.11.018

  35. [35]

      Prüsse, U.; Vorlop, K. D. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 2001, 173, 313. doi: 10.1016/S1381-1169(01)00156-X

  36. [36]

      Liao, F. L.; Huang, Y. Q.; Ge, J. W.; Zheng, W. R.; Tedsree, K.; Collier, P.; Hong, X. L.; Tsang, S. C. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2162. doi: 10.1002/anie.201007108

•