再论电负性标度的发展

引用本文: 吕仁庆, 孙涛, 王芳, 王淑涛. 再论电负性标度的发展[J]. 大学化学, 2020, 35(1): 32-39. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX201903038 shu

Citation: Renqing Lü, Tao Sun, Fang Wang, Shutao Wang. Re-discussion on the Development of Electronegativity Scales[J]. University Chemistry, 2020, 35(1): 32-39. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX201903038 shu

再论电负性标度的发展

吕仁庆 ^1, ,
孙涛 ^2, ,
王芳 ^1, ,
王淑涛 ^1,

1.
中国石油大学(华东)理学院, 山东青岛 266580;
2.
胜利第一中学化学组, 山东东营 257000

摘要: 电负性是化学中的一个重要概念，在基础化学课程中起着关键作用。本文将电负性研究过程分为三个阶段，简述了关于电负性标度的认识不断深入、逐步发展的过程，在讨论不同电负性标度的基础上，着重讨论了绝对电负性标度和Pauling类型电负性标度的差别性、Allen电负性标度及其修正的Rahm标度等，对深刻理解电负性标度这一基本概念及促进无机化学教学内容的改革均有重要意义。

关键词:

English

Re-discussion on the Development of Electronegativity Scales

1.
College of Science, China University of Petroleum(East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong Province, P. R. China;
2.
Shengli No.l Middle School, Dongying 257000, Shandong Province, P. R. China
Received Date: 31 March 2019

Abstract: Electronegativity has been one of the most important concepts in chemistry. It plays a critical role in fundamental chemistry courses. This paper proposed a view of three periods on the development of electronegativity. The process of deepening and gradually developing in understanding of electronegativity scale is briefly described. On the basis of a brief description of different electronegativity scales, the difference between absolute electronegativity scale, Pauling type electronegativity scale, Allen electronegativity scale and its modified Rahm electronegativity scale were discussed emphatically. The re-discussion is undoubtedly helpful for the in-depth understanding about the concept of electronegativity and the reform of teaching contents in fundamental studies.

Key words:

1. [1] Rahm, M.; Zeng, T.; Hoffmann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141(1), 342.
2. [2] Jensen, W. B. J. Chem. Edu. 1996, 73(1), 11.
3. [3] Pauling, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1932, 54(9), 3570.
4. [4] Mulliken, R. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1934, 2(11), 782.
5. [5] Nagle, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112(12), 4741.
6. [6] Bergmann, D.; Hinze, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1996, 35(2), 150.
7. [7] Asokamani, R.; Manjula, R. Phys. Rev. B 1989, 39(7), 4217.
8. [8] Chattaraj, P. K.; Nath, S. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1994, 49(5), 705.
9. [9] Smirnov, K. S.; Graaf, B. V. D. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1996, 92(13), 2469.
10. [10] 王汉章. 化学通报, 1964, No. 7, 38.
11. [11] 武永兴. 大学化学, 1998, 13 (3), 46.
12. [12] 张泽莹. 大学化学, 1994, 9 (3), 43.
13. [13] Allen, L. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111 (25), 9003.
14. [14] Mann, J. B.; Meek, T. L.; Allen, L. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122 (12), 2780.
15. [15] Mann, J. B.; Meek, T. L.; Knight, E. T.; Capitani, J. F.; Allen, L. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122 (21), 5132.
16. [16] Gordy, W. Phys. Rev. 1946, 69 (2), 604.
17. [17] Sanderson, R. T. Science 1951, 114 (2973), 670.
18. [18] Allred, A. L.; Rochow, E. G. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1958, 5 (4), 264.
19. [19] Parr, R. G.; Donnelly, R. A.; Levy, M.; Palke, W. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 68 (8), 3801.
20. [20] Luo, Y. R.; Benson, S. W. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30 (7), 1676.
21. [21] 李国胜, 郑能武. 化学学报, 1994, 52 (5), 448.
22. [22] 杨立新. 结构化学, 2001, 20 (2), 138.
23. [23] 刘新华. 德州学院学报, 2002, 18 (2), 38.
24. [24] Murphy, L. R.; Meek, T. L.; Allred, A. L.; Allen, L. C. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104 (24), 5867.
25. [25] Bartolotti, L. J.; Gadre S. R.; Parr R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102 (9), 2945.
26. [26] Shriver, D. F.; Atkins, P. W.; Langford, C. H. 无机化学. 第2版. 高忆慈, 史启祯, 曾克慰, 李丙瑞, 译. 北京:高等教育出版社, 1990.
27. [27] 温元凯. 中国科技大学学报, 1974, 4 (Z1), 145.
28. [28] 温元凯. 中国科技大学学报, 1975, 5 (2), 115.
29. [29] Iczkowski, R. P.; Margrave, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83 (17), 3547.
30. [30] Hinze, J.; Jaffe, H. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84 (4), 540.
31. [31] Hinze, J.; Whitehead, M. A.; Jaffe, H. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85 (2), 148.
32. [32] Hinze, J.; Jaffe, H. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1963, 67 (7), 1501.

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 10
文章访问数: 36
HTML全文浏览量: 9

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

再论电负性标度的发展

English

Re-discussion on the Development of Electronegativity Scales

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处