超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定鸡肉中4种蛋白酶抑制剂

引用本文: 吕佳乐, 刘正才, 姚闽娜, 林元地. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定鸡肉中4种蛋白酶抑制剂[J]. 色谱, 2020, 38(2): 212-217. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2019.04047 shu

Citation: LÜ Jiale, LIU Zhengcai, YAO Minna, LIN Yuandi. Determination of four protease inhibitors in chicken by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(2): 212-217. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2019.04047 shu

超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定鸡肉中4种蛋白酶抑制剂

1.
福建农林大学食品科学学院, 福建福州 350002;
2.
福州海关技术中心, 福建福州 350001
基金项目:
国家质检总局科技项目（2014IK110）；福建农林大学科技创新专项基金项目（CXZX2017013）.

摘要: 建立了鸡肉中4种蛋白酶抑制剂（沙奎那韦、利托那韦、奈非那韦、茚地那韦）的超高效液相色谱-串联质谱（UPLC-MS/MS）检测方法。样品经30%（v/v）乙腈水溶液（含1%（v/v）三氯乙酸）振荡提取、混合型阳离子交换MCX柱净化，采用Luna^® C8色谱柱（150 mm×2 mm，3 μm），以0.2%（v/v）甲酸水溶液（含5 mmol/L乙酸铵）和乙腈为流动相进行梯度洗脱，采用电喷雾电离（ESI⁺）源和多反应监测（MRM）模式检测。结果表明，在0.1~20.0 μg/L范围内，4种目标化合物呈良好的线性关系，相关系数（r²）大于0.99，方法的定量限（S/N=10）为0.20~0.90 μg/kg；鸡肉组织中4种目标化合物在1.0、2.0和10.0 μg/kg 3个水平下的平均加标回收率为69.0%~106.0%，日内和日间相对标准偏差（RSD）为2.2%~13.8%（n=6）和3.6%~14.6%（n=3）。该法简单、高效、灵敏、准确，可用于鸡肉中沙奎那韦、利托那韦、奈非那韦、茚地那韦残留量的测定。

关键词:

English

Determination of four protease inhibitors in chicken by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

1.
Food Science College of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
2.
Technology center of Fuzhou Customs District, Fuzhou 350001, China
Received Date: 29 April 2019
Fund Project:
Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of People's Republic of China (No. 2014IK110)

Abstract: A method was developed for the determination of four protease inhibitors (saquinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir and indinavir) in chicken using ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The samples were extracted by shaking with 30% (v/v) acetonitrile aqueous solution (containing 1% (v/v) trichloroacetic acid), and purified by using mixed-mode cationic-exchanger (MCX) cartridges. The samples were separated on a Luna^® C8 column (150 mm×2 mm, 3 μm) using 0.2% (v/v) formic acid aqueous solution (containing 5 mmol/L ammonium acetate) and acetonitrile as the mobile phases with gradient elution. The determination was carried out by using an electrospray ion source in the positive and multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) modes. The calibration curves showed good linearities in the range of 0.1-20.0 μg/L, and the correlation coefficients (r²) were greater than 0.99. The limits of quantification (LOQs, S/N=10) of the four protease inhibitors varied from 0.20 μg/kg to 0.90 μg/kg. At the spiked levels of 1.0, 2.0, and 10.0 μg/kg, the average recoveries of the four protease inhibitors were ranging from 69.0% to 106.0%. The intra-day and inter-day relative standard deviations (RSDs) were 2.2%-13.8% (n=6) and 3.6%-14.6% (n=3), respectively. The method is simple, efficient, sensitive and accurate, and it can be used to detect residues of saquinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir and indinavir in chicken.

Key words:

ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)
/ solid phase extraction (SPE)
/ saquinavir
/ ritonavir
/ nelfinavir
/ indinavir
/ chicken

1. [1] Cheng Z G, Fu W L, Liu S Z. Veterinary Orientation, 2010(8):42 程忠刚, 傅伟龙, 刘树中. 兽医导刊, 2010(8):42
2. [2] Song J, Du P F. Medical Recapitulate, 2013, 19(21):3971 宋建, 都鹏飞. 医学综述, 2013, 19(21):3971
3. [3] Hu L F, Zhang J Y, Luo L G, et al. Journal of Instrumental Analysis, 2014, 33(6):678 胡丽芳, 张金艳, 罗林广, 等. 分析测试学报, 2014, 33(6):678
4. [4] Mu P Q.[MS Dissertation]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2016 穆朋倩.[硕士学位论文]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2016
5. [5] Frappier S, Breilh D, Diarte E, et al. J Chromatogr B, 1998, 714(2):384
6. [6] Albert V, Modamio P, Lastra C F, et al. J Pharmaceut Biomed, 2004, 36(4):835
7. [7] Zhang J R, Sun N, Yu X T, et al. Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 2018, 38(6):584 张敬茹, 孙宁, 于小桐, 等. 中国医院药学杂志, 2018, 38(6):584
8. [8] Liang G W, Li N, Ma L P, et al. Journal of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2017, 26(2):106 梁公文, 李娜, 马丽萍, 等. 中国药学, 2017, 26(2):106
9. [9] Yu X T, Zhang J R, Sun N, et al. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2017, 52(15):1347 于小桐, 张敬茹, 孙宁, 等. 中国药学杂志, 2017, 52(15):1347
10. [10] Hoetelmans R M W, Essenberg M V, Meenhorst P L, et al. J Chromatogr B, 1997, 698(1/2):235
11. [11] Shi M H, Li J, Gan H, et al. Journal of International Pharmaceutical Research, 2016, 43(1):162 时美慧, 李俭, 甘慧, 等. 国际药学研究杂志, 2016, 43(1):162
12. [12] Chi J, Jayewardene A L, Stone J A, et al. J Pharmaceut Biomed, 2002, 30(3):675
13. [13] Xu W, Nie S P, Li J, et al. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis (Part B:Chemical Analysis), 2015, 51(1):31 徐纬, 聂四平, 李军, 等. 理化检验-化学分册, 2015, 51(1):31
14. [14] Liu X Y, Chen X Y, Zhong D F. Journal of Chinese Mass Spectrometry Society, 2017, 38(4):388 刘晓云, 陈笑艳, 钟大放. 质谱学报, 2017, 38(4):388
15. [15] Xu Y Y, Li S, Zhang Q, et al. Agrochemicals, 2017, 56(3):162 徐炎炎, 李森, 张芹, 等. 农药, 2017, 56(3):162

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 6
文章访问数: 45
HTML全文浏览量: 4

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定鸡肉中4种蛋白酶抑制剂

English

Determination of four protease inhibitors in chicken by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处