新型便携式RGB色度传感器定量检测水中路易氏剂

引用本文: 于竞翔, 刘国宏, 任丽君, 刘萌, 黄志平, 李建, 李丹萍, 肖艳华. 新型便携式RGB色度传感器定量检测水中路易氏剂[J]. 分析化学, 2020, 48(7): 962-968. doi: 10.19756/j.issn.0253-3820.191431 shu

Citation: YU Jing-Xiang, LIU Guo-Hong, REN Li-Jun, LIU Meng, HUANG Zhi-Ping, LI Jian, LI Dan-Ping, XIAO Yan-Hua. A New Portable RGB Chromaticity Sensor for Quantitative Determination of Lewisite in Water[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2020, 48(7): 962-968. doi: 10.19756/j.issn.0253-3820.191431 shu

新型便携式RGB色度传感器定量检测水中路易氏剂

陆军防化学院化学防护系, 北京 102205
基金项目:
本文系国家重点研发计划项目（No.2017YFA0207102）资助

摘要: 基于路易氏剂及其水解产物在碱性条件下与亚铜离子反应，溶液呈红色的原理，构建了定量检测水中路易氏剂的新型便携式RGB色度传感器。对增溶剂、还原剂的种类、还原剂浓度、CuCl₂浓度、NaOH浓度、乙酸用量、反应温度、反应时间等因素进行优化，得到最优反应条件：增溶剂为明胶，还原剂为盐酸羟胺，盐酸羟胺浓度为0.32 mol/L，CuCl₂浓度为0.15 mol/L，NaOH浓度为30%（m/m），36%（m/m）乙酸用量为30 μL，反应温度为室温，反应时间为5 min。在检测中采用源于归一化RGB系统的RGB（红绿蓝）色度法，克服了基于RGB模型的由于光强变化会导致3个刺激值的变化的问题。在最优条件下，色度值与路易氏剂浓度的标准曲线的线性范围为0.40~10.05 mg/L。本方法对R值和B值的理论检出限为0.389 mg/L和0.391 mg/L，实际检出限为0.40 mg/L。将本方法应用于人工水样中路易氏剂的测定，回收率为96.9%~106.9%。本方法具有较高的选择性、灵敏度和较好的重复性。

关键词:

RGB色度传感器
/ 路易氏剂
/ 水

English

A New Portable RGB Chromaticity Sensor for Quantitative Determination of Lewisite in Water

Department of Chemical Defence, Institute of NBC Defence, PLA Army, Beijing 102205, China
Received Date: 22 July 2019
Revised Date: 16 April 2020
Fund Project:
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFA0207102).

Abstract: Lewisite as well as its hydrolysis products can react with cuprous ion and produce red cuprous acetylene under the alkaline condition. To overcome the issue that a change in the intensity leads to a change in all the three components based on the RGB (red, green, blue) model, the RGB chromaticity scheme derived from normalized RGB system instead of RGB scheme was utilized for the detection in this study. The type of solubilizers and reductants, the concentrations of reductants, copper chloride and sodium hydroxide, the dosage of acetic acid, the reaction temperature, and the reaction time were optimized. As a result, gelatin and hydroxylamine hydrochloride (0.32 mol/L) were respectively used as solubilizer and reductant, the concentrations of copper chloride, sodium hydroxide and 30 μL of acetic acid were 0.15 mol/L, 30% (m/m) and 36% (m/m), respectively, and the reaction was performed for 5 min at room temperature. Under the optimal conditions, the chromaticity value showed a linear correlation with Lewisite concentration in the range of 0.40-10.05 mg/L. The theoretical detection limits for R and B values were 0.389 mg/L and 0.391 mg/L, respectively, and the practical detection limit was 0.40 mg/L. The method was successfully applied to the determination of Lewisite in artificial water samples, with the recoveries of 96.9%-106.9%. The experimental results showed that the method had high selectivity, sensitivity and good repeatability.

Key words:

1. [1]
  Goldman M, Dacre J C. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 1989,110:75-115
2. [2]
  Vilensky J A, Redman K. Ann. Emerg. Med., 2003,41(3):378-383
3. [3]
  Athar M, Li C, Srivastava R K. J. Invest. Derm., 2015,135:S98
4. [4]
  Goswami D G, Agarwal R, Tewari-Singh N. Toxicol. Lett., 2018,293:112-119
5. [5]
  Tewari-Singh N, Goswami D G, Kant R, Ammar D A, Kumar D, Enzenauer R W, Casillas R P, Croutch C R, Petrash J M, Agarwal R. Toxicol. Sci., 2017,160(2):420-428
6. [6]
  Winkler J R. J. Mil. Hist., 2007,71(2):547-548
7. [7]
  Isono O, Kituda A, Fujii M, Yoshinaka T, Nakagawa G, Suzuki Y. Toxicol. Lett.,2018,293:9-15
8. [8]
  Vucinic S, Antonijevic B, Tsatsakis A M, Vassilopoulou L, Docea A O, Nosyrev A E, Izotov B N, Thiermann H, Drakoulis N, Brkic D. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2017,56:163-171
9. [9]
  Choi S K, Jeong Y S, Koh Y J, Lee J H, Nam H W, Lee J. Bull. Kor. Chem. Soc., 2019,40(3):279-284
10. [10]
  Cheh M Y, Chua H C, Hopkins F B, Riches J R, Timperley C M, Lee H S N. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2014,406(21):5103-5110
11. [11]
  Naseri M T, Shamsipur M, Babri M, Saeidian H, Sarabadani M, Ashrafi D, Taghizadeh N. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2014,406(21):5221-5230
12. [12]
  Palcic J D, Jones J S, Flagg E L, Donovan S F. J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2015,30(8):1799-1808
13. [13]
  Okumura A, Takada Y, Watanabe S, Hashimoto H, Ezawa N, Seto Y, Sekiguchi H, Maruko H, Takayama Y, Sekioka R, Yamaguchi S, Kishi S, Satoh T, Kondo T, Nagashima H, Nagoya T. Anal. Chem., 2015,87(2):1314-1322
14. [14]
  Stanelle R D, McShane W J, Dodova E N, Pappas R S, KobelSki R J. J. Anal. Toxicol., 2010,34(3):122-128
15. [15]
  Carffrey A J, Cole J D, Gehrke R J. T. Nucl. Sci. IEEE, 1992,39(5):1422-1426
16. [16]
  Bahfenne S, Frost R L. Radiat. Eff. Defect. S., 2010,165(1):46-53
17. [17]
  Zhou L M, Zhou J M, Liu B, Dong J J, Lu S L, Lu C H. Int. Conf. Bioinform. Biomed. Eng. IEEE(ICBBE), 2008:p2942-2944
18. [18]
  Zhang Y P, Wang H T, Zhang L, Yang L, Guo X D, Bai Y. Spectrosc. Spect. Anal., 2015,35(2):466-469
19. [19]
  Vaks V L, Domracheva E G, Nabiev S S, Chemyaeva M B, Babakov A M. Atmos. Ocean. Optics, 2013,26(1):1-4
20. [20]
  Valdez C A, Leif RN, Hok S, Hart B R. Rev. Anal. Chem., 2018,37(1):1-26
21. [21]
  Bucur I, Serban S, Surpateanu A, Cupcea N, Viespe C, Grigoriu C, Toader C N, Grigoriu N. 33rd. Int. Semicond. Conf. IEEE, 2010:209-212
22. [22]
  Lee D H, Lee D N, Hong J I. New J. Chem., 2016,40(11):9021-9024
23. [23]
  Park D S, Choi S Y, Lee H Y, Kim Y T, Hong J Y, Kim C Y. Proc. IEEE,2013,101(1):18-30
24. [24]
  Broadbent A D. Color Res. Appl., 2004,29(4):267-272
25. [25]
  Apyari V V, Gorbunova M V, Isachenko A I,Dmitrienko S G, Zolotov Y A. J. Anal. Chem., 2017,72(11):32-37
26. [26]
  Li L, Zhang L P, Zhao Y, Chen Z B. Mirochim. Acta, 2018,185(4):235-240
27. [27]
  Feng L, Zhang Y, Wen L Y, Chen L, Shen Z, Guan Y F. Analyst,2011,136(20):4197-4203
28. [28]
  Lopez-Molinero A, Cubero V T, Irigoyen R D, Piazuelo D S. Talanta, 2013,103(21):236-244
29. [29]
  Chen Y, Zilberman Y, Mostafalu P, Sonkusale S R. Biosens. Bioelectron., 2015,67:477-484
30. [30]
  López-Ruiz N, Martínez-Olmos A, Pérez de Vargas-Sansalvador I M, Fernández-Ramos M D, Carvajal M A, Capitan-Vallvey L F. Sens. Actuators B,2012,171-172:938-945
31. [31]
  Nitinaivinij K, Parnklang T, Thammacharoen C, Ekgasit S, Wongravee K. Anal. Methods, 2014,6(4):9816-9824
32. [32]
  Steiner M S, Meier R J, Duerkop A, Wolfbeis O S. Anal. Chem., 2010,82(20):8402-8405
33. [33]
  Alimelli A, Filippini D, Paolesse R, Moretti S, Ciolfi G, D'Amico A, Lundström I, Natale C D. Anal. Chim. Acta,2007,597(1):103-112
34. [34]
  Yang X X, Piety N Z, Vignes S M, Benton M S, Kanter J, Shevkoplyas S S. Clin. Chem., 2013,59(10):1506-1513
35. [35]
  Belyaeva E I, Zrelova L V, Marchenko D Y, Dedov A G. Pet. Chem., 2015,55(1):74-79
36. [36]
  Kehoe E, Penn R L. J. Chem. Educ., 2013,90(9):1191-1195
37. [37]
  Botelho B G, de Assis L P, Sena M M. Food Chem., 2014,159(6):175-180

扫一扫看文章

计量

PDF下载量: 16
文章访问数: 1750
HTML全文浏览量: 254

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

新型便携式RGB色度传感器定量检测水中路易氏剂

English

A New Portable RGB Chromaticity Sensor for Quantitative Determination of Lewisite in Water

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

新型便携式RGB色度传感器定量检测水中路易氏剂

English

A New Portable RGB Chromaticity Sensor for Quantitative Determination of Lewisite in Water

CCS Chemistry：嵌段共聚物自组装成 “三明治”二维有机材料，实现纳米级压力传感功能

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南： 你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs

CCS Chemistry：工作高效不疲劳，只须让催化剂动起来

CCS Chemistry：静电组装导向聚合- 聚电解质纳米凝胶量化制备新策略

CCS Chemistry：金黄色葡萄球菌醛基脱氢酶是如何识别特异性底物的？

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

中国化学会秘书处

CCS Chemistry：颜徐州、鲍哲南：你的皮肤可能是一片SPMs