Novel 2, 4-Diarylaminopyrimidine Derivatives Containing Pyridine Moiety: Design, Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Biological Evaluation

Ju LIU Shuang WU Huan WANG Si-Yuan DU Zhen LI Ji-Wei SHEN Ye CHEN Shi DING

Citation:  Ju LIU, Shuang WU, Huan WANG, Si-Yuan DU, Zhen LI, Ji-Wei SHEN, Ye CHEN, Shi DING. Novel 2, 4-Diarylaminopyrimidine Derivatives Containing Pyridine Moiety: Design, Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Biological Evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Structural Chemistry, 2022, 41(2): 220213. doi: 10.14102/j.cnki.0254-5861.2011-3283 shu

Novel 2, 4-Diarylaminopyrimidine Derivatives Containing Pyridine Moiety: Design, Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Biological Evaluation

English

  • Cancer is one of the most health problems in the world. Although many classes of drugs were used for the treatment, the needs for safe and effective anticancer compounds are still significant target[1, 2]. Pyridine and pyrimidine-based compounds have been reported to show remarkable antitumor activities by means of inhibiting multiple enzymes, and some of them are already being marketed or are under clinical/preclinical studies, such as imatinib, sorafenib, crizotinib, abiraterone, BMS-794833, altiratinib, and BMS-777607[3-6]. Among above compounds, BMS-794833, altiratinib, and BMS-777607 are representative 4-phenoxypyridine based type II c-Met kinase inhibitors[7, 8]. Blocking c-Met kinase activity by small-molecule inhibitors has been identified as a promising approach for the treatment of cancers[9].

    As described in Fig. 1, structurally, most of 4-phenoxy-pyridine type II c-Met inhibitors may be disconnected into three moieties: a 4-phenoxypyridine core (moiety A), a phenyl or substituted phenyl group (moiety B) and a linker bridge (moiety C). Moiety A and moiety B are crucial for kinase activity[10-12]. With the goal of finding more 4-phenoxypyri-dine-based antitumor agents, N-[4-(2-fluorophenoxy)pyridin-2-yl]cyclopropanecarboxamide was used as the moiety A. Pyrimidine-2, 4-diamine was introduced into the moiety C via cyclization strategy. Furthermore, various substituents were introduced at the phenyl ring (moiety B) to investigate their effects on activities (Fig. 1). Accordingly, a series of 4-phenoxypyridine derivatives were designed, synthesized and evaluated for their in vitro antiproliferative activities against MKN-45, HT-29, A549, K562 and GIST882 cancer cell lines.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  The representative 4-phenoxypyridine type II c-Met kinase inhibitors and design strategy of the target compounds

    Unless otherwise specified, all materials were obtained from commercial suppliers and were used without further purification. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Biospin 600 MHz instrument using TMS as the internal standard. All chemical shifts were reported in ppm. IR spectra were recorded as KBr pellets on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum one FT-IR spectrometer. MS spectra were obtained on an Agilent 6460 QQQ mass spectrometer (Agilent, USA) analysis system. Crystal data were obtained on a Bruker P4 X-diffractometer.

    Cyclopropanecarbonyl chloride (9.30 g, 89.00 mmol) was dissolved in dried CH2Cl2 (30 mL) and dropwise added to a mixture of 4-chloropyridin-2-amine (8.80 g, 68.45 mmol), Et3N (20.78 g, 205.35 mmol) and CH2Cl2 (80 mL) in an ice bath, which was then removed to raise the temperature to room temperature and stirred for 12 h. The resulting mixture was sequentially washed with 20% K2CO3 (50 mL × 3) and brine (50 mL × 3), and the organic phase was separated, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product obtained was purified by silica gel chromatography to give 9.78 g (yield: 73%) of 1 as a white solid. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3242(-NH-), 1707(C=O), 1670, 1588(C=N), 1574(Ar), 1537(Ar), 1404, 1257, 1213, 1190, 1150, 960, 873, 824, 710; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.79 (s, 1H), 8.31 (s, 1H), 8.16 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (dd, J = 5.4, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 1.60~1.49 (m, 1H), 1.17~1.09 (m, 2H), 0.97~0.87 (m, 2H); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 197.1 [M+H]+.

    A stirring mixture of compound 8 (8.00 g, 40.68 mmol) and 2-fluoro-4-nitrophenol (15.98 g, 101.71 mmol) in chloroben-zene (100 mL) was refluxed for about 40 h. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure to yield a pale solid. The solid was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (150 mL), washed with saturated K2CO3 aqueous solution (80 mL × 4) and then brine (60 mL × 4), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and finally concentrated under reduced pressure to afford a brown solid, which was purified by silica gel chromatography to give 7.13 g (yield: 55%) of 2 as a light yellow solid. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3418(-NH-), 1687(C=O), 1617(C=N), 1529(Ar), 1493(Ar), 1354, 1300, 1272, 1180, 1070, 875, 798; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.00 (s, 1H), 8.43 (dd, J = 10.3, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 8.30 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 8.19 (dd, J = 9.0, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (dd, J = 5.6, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 2.04~1.95 (m, 1H), 0.78 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 4H); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 318.1 [M+H]+.

    A mixture of compound 2 (6.00 g, 18.91 mmol), iron powder (5.28 g, 94.56 mmol), acetic acid (11.36 g, 189.10 mmol), water (20 mL) and ethyl acetate (100 mL) was heated to reflux for 2 h. After completion of the reaction as indicated by TLC, the mixture was filtered immediately. The organic layer of the filtrate was separated, washed with water, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and filtered, and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure when white solid appeared, which was filtered to obtain 3.51 g (yield: 65%) of 3 as a white solid. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3411(-NH-), 2026, 1737(C=O), 1618(C=N), 1510(Ar), 1427, 1207, 1163, 993, 956, 866, 822, 610; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.79 (s, 1H), 8.15 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (s, 1H), 6.95 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 6.67~6.61 (m, 1H), 6.49 (dd, J = 13.1, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (s, 2H), 2.03~1.88 (m, 1H), 0.76 (br, 4H); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 288.1 [M+H]+, 310.1 [M+Na]+.

    A mixture of compound 3 (3.00 g, 10.44 mmol), 2, 4-di-chloropyrimidine (1.87 g, 12.53 mmol), and diisopropylethylamine (1.35 g, 10.44 mmol) in isopropanol (50 mL) was heated at reflux for 25 h. Upon cooling to room temperature, the mixture evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in dichloromethane (80 mL), and washed with water (50 mL × 3). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford crude product, which was purified by silica gel chromatography to give 3.17 g (yield: 76%) of 4 as a white solid. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.90 (s, 1H), 10.34 (s, 1H), 8.25~8.22 (m, 2H), 7.88~7.60 (m, 2H), 7.50~7.30 (m, 2H), 6.85~6.71 (m, 2H), 2.03~1.92 (m, 1H), 0.84~0.72 (m, 4H); MS (ESI) m/z (%): 400.1 [M+H]+, 422.0 [M+Na]+.

    A mixture of compound 4 (0.20 g, 0.50 mmol), aromatic amine (1.3 equivalents) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (1.0 equivalent) in isopropanol (8.0 mL) was refluxed for about 18 h. After cooling to room temperature, the resultant precipitate was filtered and dried under vacuum to afford the target compounds 5a~5f as white solid.

    N-(4-(2-fluoro-4-((2-(phenylamino)pyrimidin-4-yl)ami- no)phenoxy)pyridin-2-yl)cyclopropanecarboxamide (5a)

    Yield: 67%; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.58 (d, J = 13.1 Hz, 1H), 9.37 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H), 9.05~8.80 (m, 1H), 8.20~8.06 (m, 2H), 8.02 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 7.81~7.62 (m, 3H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.30~7.19 (m, 2H), 7.10 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.65~6.50 (m, 1H), 6.22 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 2.04~1.89 (m, 1H), 0.91~0.83 (m, 2H), 0.79~0.72 (m, 2H); MS (ESI) m/z(%): 457.2 [M+H]+, 479.1 [M+Na]+.

    N-(4-(2-fluoro-4-((2-((4-fluorophenyl)amino)pyri- midin-4-yl)amino)phenoxy)pyridin-2-yl)cyclo- propanecarboxamide (5b)

    Yield: 59%; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.74~10.55 (m, 1H), 9.53~9.32 (m, 1H), 9.16~8.87 (m, 1H), 8.20~7.92 (m, 3H), 7.70 (d, J = 13.4 Hz, 3H), 7.41~7.28 (m, 1H), 7.19~7.04 (m, 1H), 7.04~6.88 (m, 2H), 6.64~6.50 (m, 1H), 6.31~6.12 (m, 1H), 5.86~5.82 (m, 1H), 2.03~1.88 (m, 1H), 0.96~0.58 (m, 4H); IR (KBr, cm-1): 3258(-NH-), 2355, 1678(C=O), 1591, 1508(Ar), 1422(Ar), 1312, 1207, 982, 820; MS (ESI) m/z (%): 475.2 [M+H]+, 497.1 [M+Na]+.

    N-(4-(4-((2-((4-chlorophenyl)amino)pyrimidin- 4-yl)amino)-2-fluorophenoxy)pyridin- 2-yl)cyclopropanecarboxamide (5c)

    Yield: 55%; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.67~10.45 (m, 1H), 9.50~9.31 (m, 1H), 9.18~8.92 (m, 1H), 8.26~7.96 (m, 3H), 7.79~7.67 (m, 3H), 7.35 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.26~7.00 (m, 3H), 6.59 (dd, J = 5.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.24 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 2.07~1.86 (m, 1H), 0.90~0.83 (m, 2H), 0.79~0.73 (m, 2H); IR (KBr, cm-1): 3281(-NH-), 2353, 1672(C=O), 1585, 1416(Ar), 1308, 1204, 1094, 978, 804, 687; MS (ESI) m/z (%): 491.1 [M+H]+, 513.1 [M+Na]+.

    N-(4-(4-((2-((3-chlorophenyl)amino)pyrimidin- 4-yl)amino)-2-fluorophenoxy)pyridin-2- yl)cyclopropanecarboxamide (5d)

    Yield: 57%; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.51 (br, 1H), 9.36 (br, 1H), 9.17~9.04 (m, 1H), 8.13 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (s, 1H), 7.92~7.83 (m, 1H), 7.74 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.60~6.55 (m, 1H), 6.31~6.22 (m, 1H), 2.03~1.84 (m, 1H), 0.91~0.86 (m, 2H), 0.79~0.74 (m, 2H); IR (KBr, cm-1): 3305(-NH-), 2357, 1679(C=O), 1619, 1416, 1314, 1207, 1105, 990, 808; MS (ESI) m/z (%): 491.1 [M+H]+, 513.1 [M+Na]+.

    N-(4-(4-((2-((3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)amino)pyri- midin-4-yl)amino)-2-fluorophenoxy)pyridin- 2-yl)cyclopropanecarboxamide (5e)

    Yield: 45%; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.76~10.50 (m, 1H), 9.48 (d, J = 13.0 Hz, 1H), 9.25 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 8.17~8.10 (m, 1H), 8.06~7.97 (m, 3H), 7.71 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (br, 1H), 7.45~7.33 (m, 1H), 7.20~7.03 (m, 2H), 6.64~6.54 (m, 1H), 6.26 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 1.97 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 0.92~0.71 (m, 4H); IR (KBr, cm-1): 3269(-NH-), 2349, 1678(C=O), 1591, 1413(Ar), 1310, 1259, 1207, 1101, 990, 808; MS (ESI) m/z (%): 509.1 [M+H]+, 531.1 [M+Na]+.

    N-(4-(2-fluoro-4-((2-(p-tolylamino)pyrimidin- 4-yl)amino)phenoxy)pyridin-2-yl)cyclo- propanecarboxamide (5f)

    Yield: 62%; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.63 (s, 1H), 9.38 (s, 1H), 8.85 (s, 1H), 8.16~8.08 (m, 2H), 8.00 (d, J = 0.6 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (s, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.07~7.01 (m, 2H), 6.59 (dd, J = 5.7, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.19 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 2.27 (s, 3H), 2.05~1.90 (m, 1H), 0.89~0.82 (m, 2H), 0.79~0.72 (m, 2H); IR (KBr, cm-1): 3196(-NH-), 3017, 2363, 1680(C=O), 1586, 1524(Ar), 1420, 1308, 1206, 1101, 986, 804, 700; MS (ESI) m/z (%): 471.2 [M+H]+, 493.2 [M+Na]+.

    The white powder of compounds 5d and 5e was dissolved in ethanol/ethyl acetate/tetrahydrofuran = 5:2:3 (V/V/V) and 5:3:1 (V/V/V) mixed solvents, respectively. After slowly evaporating the solvents for several days, some single crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained. The X-ray crystallography data for two crystals were collected on a Bruker APEX-II CCD automatic diffractometer with graphite-monochromatized MoKa radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) using the φ and ω-scan mode at 296(2) K. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined with the SHELX crystallographic software package[13] and expanded by Fourier technique. The non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The hydrogen atoms bound to carbon were determined with theoretical calculations and those attached to nitrogen and oxygen were determined with successive difference Fourier syntheses. Empirical absorption correction was applied. The structure was solved by direct methods using SADABS[14]. The hydrogen atoms were placed at the calculated positions and refined as riding atoms with isotropic displacement parameters[15]. Crystallographic data and experimental details of structural analyses for 5d and 5e are summarized in Table 1. The hydrogen bonds of the title compound are listed in Table 2, and geometric parameters for it can be found in Table 3.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Crystal Data of Compounds 5d and 5e
    DownLoad: CSV
    Compound 5d 5e
    CCDC 2088950 2088951
    Empirical formula C25H20ClFN6O2 C25H19ClF2N6O2
    Formula weight 490.91 508.91
    Crystal size (mm 3) 0.23 × 0.20 × 0.16 0.28 × 0.25 × 0.22
    Crystal system Monoclinic Monoclinic
    Space group P21/c P21/c
    a (Å) 11.0500(10) 10.9998(18)
    b (Å) 18.3045(17) 18.517(3)
    c (Å) 13.5646(9) 13.6355(16)
    α (°) 90 90
    β (°) 122.806(5) 123.315(9)
    γ (°) 90 90
    Volume (Å3) 2306.1(4) 2320.9(6)
    Z 4 4
    Dc (g·cm-3) 1.411 1.456
    Index ranges –9≤h≤13
    –21≤k≤21
    –16≤l≤14
    –12≤h≤13
    –22≤k≤14
    –16≤l≤15
    Absorption coefficient (μ) 0.210 0.218
    F(000) 1012 1048
    Theta range for data collection (o) 2.104 to 24.998 2.099 to 24.998
    Reflections collected 11625 11670
    Independent reflections 4051 4072
    Rint 0.0273 0.0437
    Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.060 1.054
    R, wR(I > 2σ(I)) R = 0.0606, wR = 0.2068 R = 0.0495, wR = 0.1139
    R, wR(all data) R = 0.0866, wR = 0.2263 R = 0.0943, wR = 0.1282
    R = ∑(||Fo|–|Fc||)/∑|Fo|, wR = [∑w(Fo2Fc2)2/∑w(Fo2)2]1/2

    Table 2

    Table 2.  Hydrogen Bond Lengths (Å) and Bond Angles (°) of 5d and 5e
    DownLoad: CSV
    5d D–H···A d(D–H) d(H···A) d(D···A) ∠DHA
    N(1)–H(1)···N(5) 0.86 2.26 3.084(4) 160
    N(4)–H(4)···O(2)#1 0.86 2.06 2.871(4) 157
    5e N(1)–H(1)···N(5)#1 0.86 2.24 3.051(3) 159
    N(4)–H(4)···O(2)#2 0.86 2.06 2.874(2) 157
    Symmetry codes: 5d: #1: –x, y+1/2, –z+1/2; 5e: #1: –x, –y, –z; #2: x, –y–1/2, z–1/2

    Table 3

    Table 3.  Geometric Parameters of 5d and 5e
    DownLoad: CSV
    Bond Dist. for 5d Dist. for 5e Angle 5d (o) 5e (o)
    C(1)–N(1) 1.397(4) 1.409(3) C(6)–C(1)–N(1) 124.3(3) 122.9(3)
    C(1)–C(2) 1.403(5) 1.387(4) C(6)–C(1)–C(2) 118.6(3) 119.2(3)
    C(3)–Cl(1) 1.745(4) 1.728(3) N(2)–C(7)–N(3) 127.8(3) 127.5(2)
    C(7)–N(2) 1.334(4) 1.341(3) N(3)–C(7)–N(1) 114.5(3) 114.8(2)
    C(7)–N(1) 1.381(4) 1.364(3) C(8)–C(9)–C(10) 116.6(3) 116.2(3)
    C(8)–C(9) 1.365(5) 1.358(4) C(12)–C(11)–N(4) 119.8(3) 121.1(2)
    C(10)–N(4) 1.357(4) 1.361(3) C(18)–C(17)–C(21) 120.4(3) 120.1(3)
    To be continued
    C(11)–C(12) 1.388(5) 1.396(4) N(5)–C(19)–N(6) 114.7(3) 114.5(2)
    C(11)–N(4) 1.401(4) 1.405(3) C(22)–C(23)–C(24) 117.5(3) 115.9(3)
    C(14)–O(1) 1.382(4) 1.398(3) C(24)–C(23)–C(25) 58.5(3) 58.6(2)
    C(17)–C(18) 1.377(4) 1.377(4) C(7)–N(1)–C(1) 127.6(3) 127.6(2)
    C(17)–O(1) 1.379(4) 1.379(3) C(7)–N(2)–C(10) 116.0(3) 115.9(2)
    C(19)–N(5) 1.333(4) 1.338(3) C(7)–N(3)–C(8) 113.8(3) 113.9(2)
    C(19)–N(6) 1.399(4) 1.398(3) C(22)–N(6)–C(19) 126.2(3) 126.2(2)
    C(22)–O(2) 1.226(4) 1.230(3) C(17)–O(1)–C(14) 117.7(2) 116.8(2)
    C(22)–N(6) 1.362(4) 1.358(3) N(1)–C(1)–C(2)–C(3) –177.3(3) 175.3(2)
    C(22)–C(23) 1.471(5) 1.464(4) O(1)–C(14)–C(15)–C(16) 178.5(3) 178.3(2
    C(23)–C(24) 1.507(5) 1.509(4) N(2)–C(7)–N(1)–C(1) –7.6(5) 6.1(4)
    C(24)–C(25) 1.477(6) 1.469(4) N(6)–C(22)–C(23)–C(25) –133.3(3) –163.5(2)

    The antiproliferative activities of compounds 5a~5f were evaluated against human gastric cancer cell lines MKN-45, human colon cancer cell lines HT-29, human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines A549, human chronic myeloid leukemia cell lines K562 and human gastrointestinal stromal tumor cell lines GIST882 using the standard MTT assay in vitro, with Foretinib as the positive control. The cancer cell lines were cultured in minimum essential medium (MEM) supplement with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Approximate 4 × 103 cells, suspended in MEM medium, were plated onto each well of a 96-well plate and incubated in 5% CO2 at 37 ℃ for 24 h. The tested compounds at the indicated final concentrations were added to the culture medium and the cell cultures were continued for 72 h. Fresh MTT was added to each well at a terminal concentration of 5 μg/mL, and incubated with cells at 37 ℃ for 4 h. The formazan crystals were dissolved in 100 mL DMSO each well, and the absorbency at 492 nm (for absorbance of MTT formazan) and 630 nm (for the reference wavelength) was measured with an ELISA reader. All compounds were tested three times in each cell line. The results expressed as IC50 (inhibitory concentration 50%) were the averages of three determinations and calculated by using the Bacus Laboratories Incorporated Slide Scanner (Bliss) software.

    The syntheses of target compounds 5a~5f were outlined in Scheme 1. Commercially available 4-chloropyridin-2-amine was condensed with cyclopropanecarbonyl chloride in the presence of Et3N to provide 1, which underwent a nucleophilic substitution with 2-fluoro-4-nitrophenol to give the desired intermediate 2. Reduction of the nitro group of 2 with iron powder and acetic acid in ethyl acetate/water (10:1 v/v) provided aniline compound 3. 3 reacted with 2, 4-dichloro-pyrimidine in refluxing i-PrOH to provide key intermediate 4 under the catalysis of DIPEA. 4 reacted with different substituted anilines in the presence of p-toluenesulfonic acid in refluxing i-PrOH to yield the target compounds 5a-5f, and the their structures were confirmed by 1H NMR, IR and ESI-MS.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Synthetic route and structure of target compounds

    The structures of compounds 5d and 5e were further confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The molecular structures of compounds 5d and 5e with atom-numbering are shown in Fig. 2. Both crystal structures of 5d and 5e crystallize in monoclinic space group P21/c. Their crystal structures show that the two molecules have a 2, 4-diarylaminopyrimidine skeleton, in which all bond lengths and bond angles fall in normal ranges. Both of the crystal structures consist of five rings: a three-membered cyclopropane (A), a pyrimidine ring (B), a pyridine ring (C) and two benzene rings (D, E). For compound 5d, the molecule is not coplanar because the dihedral angles between rings A, B and C are 75.44° (A/C), 78.30° (A/B), 61.80° (A/D) and 33.91° (A/E), indicating rings B and C are almost perpendicular to ring A. For compound 5e, the molecule is also not coplanar because the dihedral angles between rings A, B, C, D and E are 75.12° (A/C), 77.42° (A/B), 61.87° (A/D) and 47.67° (A/D), so similar perpendicular conformation is also found. For compounds 5d and 5e, the bond lengths of C(22)–O(2) are 1.226(4) and 1.230(3) Å belonging to the typical C=O double bond[16]. Meanwhile, hydrogen bonding interactions play a significant role in the crystal packing of 5d and 5e (Table 2). A mass of intermolecular hydrogen bonds N(4)–H(4A)⋅⋅⋅O(2), N(3)–H(6A)⋅⋅⋅N(6) and N(6)–H(6)⋅⋅⋅N(3) found in the two compounds play a major role in stabilizing the molecule. And the molecular structures of compounds 5d and 5e are shown in Fig. 3, depicting the molecular packing and hydrogen bonds in a unit cell. Within the molecule, the bond lengths and bond angles present no unusual features.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Molecular structure of compound 5d and 5e in a single crystal at 296 K

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Crystal packing diagrams of compounds 5d and 5e

    The IC50 values of 5a~5f and Foretinib against MKN-45, HT-29, A549, K562 and GIST882 cancer cells are presented in Table 4, in which all the tested compounds show excellent antiproliferative activities against different cancer cells with IC50 values ranging from 0.38 to 6.29 μM, indicating that newly synthesized 4-phenoxypyridine derivatives maintained antitumor activities. Notably, compounds 5a (R1 = H), 5c (R1 = 4-Cl) and 5e (R1 = 3-Cl-4-F) exhibited remarkable antiproliferative activities against GIST882, K562 and A549 cell lines with IC50 values of 0.68 μM (foretinib: 0.75 μM), 0.38 μM (foretinib: 0.39 μM) and 0.60 μM (foretinib: 0.94 μM), respectively, which were all better than the positive control foretinib.

    Table 4

    Table 4.  Antiproliferative Activities of Target Compounds against Some Cancer Cells in vitro
    DownLoad: CSV
    Compd. R1 IC50 (μM)
    MKN-45 HT-29 A549 K562 GIST882
    5a H 2.38 3.51 2.34 0.95 0.68
    5b 4-F 1.26 2.09 2.25 0.61 1.92
    5c 4-Cl 0.62 1.05 1.50 0.38 1.54
    5d 3-Cl 1.36 2.36 2.23 1.01 2.85
    5e 3-Cl-4-F 0.75 2.92 0.60 0.65 2.44
    5f 4-CH3 3.34 6.29 3.62 1.98 2.39
    Foretinib --- 0.032 0.86 0.94 0.39 0.75

    Furthermore, some physicochemical and ADME properties of the synthesized compounds and positive controls were predicted using the SwissADME (a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules) for their adaptability with Lipinski's rule of five[17-19]. Compounds obeying at least three of the four criteria are considered to adhere to Lipinski Rule.

    As demonstrated in Table 5, the most active compounds show variable permeability based on gastrointestinal absorption (GI), according to the BOILED-Egg predictive model (Brain Or IntestinaL EstimateD permeation method). All predicted compounds showed high gastrointestinal absorption. With respect to oral bioavailability, it is expected 0.55 of probability of oral bioavailability score > 10% in the rat for all compounds, the same as the control drug foretinib (0.55). Compound 5a~5f exhibited potent in vitro antitumor activity, low toxicity and reasonable physicochemical properties, because suitable flexible and size in the bioavailability radar map (Fig. 4). All these data suggests that compound 5a~5f could be considered as a candidate for further research.

    Table 5

    Table 5.  Physicochemical Properties and ADME Properties of Target Compounds
    DownLoad: CSV
    Compd. MW
    (g/mol)
    < 500
    H-bond
    acceptors
    < 10
    H-bond
    donors
    < 5
    Log P
    o/w
    < 5
    Violation
    Lipinski
    Rule of 5
    aPSA
    (Ų)
    ≤140
    Rotatable bonds
    < 10
    bBBB cGI dBS
    5a 456.47 6 3 3.94 0 101.06 9 NO Low 0.55
    5b 474.46 7 3 4.13 0 101.06 9 NO Low 0.55
    5c 490.92 6 3 4.46 0 101.06 9 NO Low 0.55
    5d 490.92 6 3 4.41 0 101.06 9 NO Low 0.55
    5e 508.91 7 3 4.66 1 101.06 9 NO Low 0.55
    5f 470.50 6 3 4.12 0 101.06 9 NO Low 0.55
    Foretinib 632.65 10 2 4.80 1 111.25 14 NO Low 0.55
    aPSA – polar surface area. bBBB – blood-brain barrier. cGI – gastrointestinal absorption. dBS – bioavailability score.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  The bioavailability radar enables a first glance at the drug-likeness of target compounds and Foretinib. The pink area represents the optimal range for each properties (lipophilicity: XLOGP3 between –0.7 and +5.0, size: MW between 150 and 500 g/mol, polarity: TPSA between 20 and 130 Å2, solubility: logS not higher than 6, saturation: fraction of carbons in the sp3 hybridization not less than 0.25, and flexibility: no more than 9 rotatable bonds.

    Supplementary data associated with this article have been deposited in the ESI.
    Electronic supplementary information
    1. [1]

      Lu, J. F.; Jin, L. X.; Ge, H. G.; Ji, X. H.; Guo, X. H.; Tian, G. H.; Song, J.; Jiang, M. Synthesis, crystal, computational study and biological activity of N-(1-(2, 4-dichlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazolo[3, 4-d]pyrimidin-4-y l)-4-(N, N-dipropylsulfamoyl) benzamide. Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 2017, 36, 1810–1816.

    2. [2]

      Chung, B. P. M.; Leung, D.; Leung, S. M.; Loke, A. Y. Beyond death and dying: how Chinese spouses navigate the final days with their loved ones suffering from terminal cancer. Support. Care Cancer 2018, 26, 261–267. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3844-z

    3. [3]

      Tang, Q. D.; Zhao, Y. F.; Du, X. M.; Chong, L.; Gong, P.; Guo, C. Design, synthesis, and structure-activity relationships of novel 6, 7-disubstituted-4-phenoxyquinoline derivatives as potential antitumor agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 69, 77–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.08.019

    4. [4]

      Cai, Z. W.; Borzilleri, R. M. 4-pyridinone compounds and their use for cancer, WO2009094417, 2009-07-30.

    5. [5]

      Smith, B. D.; Kaufman, M. D.; Leary, C. B.; Turner, B. A.; Wise, S. C.; Ahn, Y. M.; Booth, R. J.; Caldwell, T. M.; Ensinger, C. L.; Hood, M. M.; Lu, W. P.; Patt, T. W.; Patt, W. C.; Rutkoski, T. J.; Samarakoon, T.; Telikepalli, H.; Vogeti, L.; Vogeti, S.; Yates, K. M.; Chun, L.; Stewart, L. J.; Clare, M.; Flynn, D. L. Altiratinib inhibits tumor growth, invasion, angiogenesis, and microenvironment-mediated drug resistance via balanced inhibition of MET, TIE2, and VEGFR2. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14, 2023. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-1105

    6. [6]

      Dai, Y.; Siemann, D. W. BMS-777607, a small-molecule met kinase inhibitor, suppresses hepatocyte growth factor-stimulated prostate cancer metastatic phenotype in vitro. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 1554–1561. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0359

    7. [7]

      Wang, Z.; Shi, J. T.; Zhu, X. L.; Zhao, W. W.; Gong, Y. L.; Hao, X. C.; Hou, Y. L.; Liu, Y. J.; Ding, S.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 4-phenoxypyridine based 3-oxo-3, 4-dihydroquinoxaline-2-carboxamide derivatives as potential c-Met kinase inhibitors. Bioorg Chem. 2020, 105, 104371. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104371

    8. [8]

      Cui, H.; Peng, X.; Liu, J.; Ma, C. H.; Ji, Y. C.; Zhang, W.; Geng, M. Y.; Li, Y. X. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of c-Met kinase inhibitors bearing 2-oxo-1, 2-dihydroquinoline scaffold. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 4483–4486. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.07.077

    9. [9]

      Ma, P. C.; Tretiakova, M. S.; Nallasura, V.; Jagadeeswaran, R.; Husain, A. N.; Salgia, R. Downstream signalling and specific inhibition of c-MET/HGF pathway in small cell lung cancer: implications for tumour invasion. Br. J. Cancer. 2007, 97, 368–377. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603884

    10. [10]

      Tang, Q. D.; Wang, L. X.; Tu, Y. Y.; Zhu, W. F.; Luo, R.; Tu, Q. D.; Wang, P.; Wu, C. J.; Gong, P.; Zheng, P. W. Discovery of novel pyrrolo[2, 3-b]pyridine derivatives bearing 1, 2, 3-triazole moiety as c-Met kinase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 1680–1684. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.02.059

    11. [11]

      Liu, J.; Gong, Y. L.; Shi, J. T.; Hao, X. C.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y. P.; Hou, Y. L.; Liu, Y. J.; Ding, S.; Chen, Y. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel N-[4-(2-fluorophenoxy)pyridin-2-yl]cyclopropanecarboxamide derivatives as potential c-Met kinase inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 194, 112244. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112244

    12. [12]

      Qi, B.; Tao, H.; Wu, D.; Bai, J.; Shi, Y.; Gong, P. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 4-phenoxy-6, 7-disubstituted quinolines possessing semicarbazone scaffolds as selective c-Met inhibitors. Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2013, 346, 596–609. doi: 10.1002/ardp.201300087

    13. [13]

      Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXT − Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, A71, 3–8.

    14. [14]

      Sheldrick, G. M. SADABS, Program for Empirical Absorption Correction for Area Detector Data (Univ. of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 1996).

    15. [15]

      Sheldrick, G. M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, C71, 3–8.

    16. [16]

      Liu, W. R.; Hua, X. W.; Zhou, S.; Yuan, F. Y.; Wang, G. Q.; Liu, Y.; Xing, X. R. Design, synthesis and biological activity of N-sulfonyl aromatic amide derivatives. Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 2021, 40, 666–674.

    17. [17]

      Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F. B.; Dominy, W.; Feeney, P. J. Experimental and computationalapproaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1997, 23, 3–25. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00423-1

    18. [18]

      Veber, D. F.; Johnson, S. R.; Cheng, H. Y.; Smith, B. R.; Ward, K. W.; Kopple, K. D. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2615–2623. doi: 10.1021/jm020017n

    19. [19]

      de Santana, T. I.; Barbosa, M. D.; Gomes, P. A. T. M.; da Cruz, A. C. N.; da Silva, T. G.; Leite, A. C. L. Synthesis, anticancer activity and mechanism of action of new thiazole derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 144, 874–886. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.12.040

  • Figure 1  The representative 4-phenoxypyridine type II c-Met kinase inhibitors and design strategy of the target compounds

    Scheme 1  Synthetic route and structure of target compounds

    Figure 2  Molecular structure of compound 5d and 5e in a single crystal at 296 K

    Figure 3  Crystal packing diagrams of compounds 5d and 5e

    Figure 4  The bioavailability radar enables a first glance at the drug-likeness of target compounds and Foretinib. The pink area represents the optimal range for each properties (lipophilicity: XLOGP3 between –0.7 and +5.0, size: MW between 150 and 500 g/mol, polarity: TPSA between 20 and 130 Å2, solubility: logS not higher than 6, saturation: fraction of carbons in the sp3 hybridization not less than 0.25, and flexibility: no more than 9 rotatable bonds.

    Table 1.  Crystal Data of Compounds 5d and 5e

    Compound 5d 5e
    CCDC 2088950 2088951
    Empirical formula C25H20ClFN6O2 C25H19ClF2N6O2
    Formula weight 490.91 508.91
    Crystal size (mm 3) 0.23 × 0.20 × 0.16 0.28 × 0.25 × 0.22
    Crystal system Monoclinic Monoclinic
    Space group P21/c P21/c
    a (Å) 11.0500(10) 10.9998(18)
    b (Å) 18.3045(17) 18.517(3)
    c (Å) 13.5646(9) 13.6355(16)
    α (°) 90 90
    β (°) 122.806(5) 123.315(9)
    γ (°) 90 90
    Volume (Å3) 2306.1(4) 2320.9(6)
    Z 4 4
    Dc (g·cm-3) 1.411 1.456
    Index ranges –9≤h≤13
    –21≤k≤21
    –16≤l≤14
    –12≤h≤13
    –22≤k≤14
    –16≤l≤15
    Absorption coefficient (μ) 0.210 0.218
    F(000) 1012 1048
    Theta range for data collection (o) 2.104 to 24.998 2.099 to 24.998
    Reflections collected 11625 11670
    Independent reflections 4051 4072
    Rint 0.0273 0.0437
    Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.060 1.054
    R, wR(I > 2σ(I)) R = 0.0606, wR = 0.2068 R = 0.0495, wR = 0.1139
    R, wR(all data) R = 0.0866, wR = 0.2263 R = 0.0943, wR = 0.1282
    R = ∑(||Fo|–|Fc||)/∑|Fo|, wR = [∑w(Fo2Fc2)2/∑w(Fo2)2]1/2
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 2.  Hydrogen Bond Lengths (Å) and Bond Angles (°) of 5d and 5e

    5d D–H···A d(D–H) d(H···A) d(D···A) ∠DHA
    N(1)–H(1)···N(5) 0.86 2.26 3.084(4) 160
    N(4)–H(4)···O(2)#1 0.86 2.06 2.871(4) 157
    5e N(1)–H(1)···N(5)#1 0.86 2.24 3.051(3) 159
    N(4)–H(4)···O(2)#2 0.86 2.06 2.874(2) 157
    Symmetry codes: 5d: #1: –x, y+1/2, –z+1/2; 5e: #1: –x, –y, –z; #2: x, –y–1/2, z–1/2
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 3.  Geometric Parameters of 5d and 5e

    Bond Dist. for 5d Dist. for 5e Angle 5d (o) 5e (o)
    C(1)–N(1) 1.397(4) 1.409(3) C(6)–C(1)–N(1) 124.3(3) 122.9(3)
    C(1)–C(2) 1.403(5) 1.387(4) C(6)–C(1)–C(2) 118.6(3) 119.2(3)
    C(3)–Cl(1) 1.745(4) 1.728(3) N(2)–C(7)–N(3) 127.8(3) 127.5(2)
    C(7)–N(2) 1.334(4) 1.341(3) N(3)–C(7)–N(1) 114.5(3) 114.8(2)
    C(7)–N(1) 1.381(4) 1.364(3) C(8)–C(9)–C(10) 116.6(3) 116.2(3)
    C(8)–C(9) 1.365(5) 1.358(4) C(12)–C(11)–N(4) 119.8(3) 121.1(2)
    C(10)–N(4) 1.357(4) 1.361(3) C(18)–C(17)–C(21) 120.4(3) 120.1(3)
    To be continued
    C(11)–C(12) 1.388(5) 1.396(4) N(5)–C(19)–N(6) 114.7(3) 114.5(2)
    C(11)–N(4) 1.401(4) 1.405(3) C(22)–C(23)–C(24) 117.5(3) 115.9(3)
    C(14)–O(1) 1.382(4) 1.398(3) C(24)–C(23)–C(25) 58.5(3) 58.6(2)
    C(17)–C(18) 1.377(4) 1.377(4) C(7)–N(1)–C(1) 127.6(3) 127.6(2)
    C(17)–O(1) 1.379(4) 1.379(3) C(7)–N(2)–C(10) 116.0(3) 115.9(2)
    C(19)–N(5) 1.333(4) 1.338(3) C(7)–N(3)–C(8) 113.8(3) 113.9(2)
    C(19)–N(6) 1.399(4) 1.398(3) C(22)–N(6)–C(19) 126.2(3) 126.2(2)
    C(22)–O(2) 1.226(4) 1.230(3) C(17)–O(1)–C(14) 117.7(2) 116.8(2)
    C(22)–N(6) 1.362(4) 1.358(3) N(1)–C(1)–C(2)–C(3) –177.3(3) 175.3(2)
    C(22)–C(23) 1.471(5) 1.464(4) O(1)–C(14)–C(15)–C(16) 178.5(3) 178.3(2
    C(23)–C(24) 1.507(5) 1.509(4) N(2)–C(7)–N(1)–C(1) –7.6(5) 6.1(4)
    C(24)–C(25) 1.477(6) 1.469(4) N(6)–C(22)–C(23)–C(25) –133.3(3) –163.5(2)
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 4.  Antiproliferative Activities of Target Compounds against Some Cancer Cells in vitro

    Compd. R1 IC50 (μM)
    MKN-45 HT-29 A549 K562 GIST882
    5a H 2.38 3.51 2.34 0.95 0.68
    5b 4-F 1.26 2.09 2.25 0.61 1.92
    5c 4-Cl 0.62 1.05 1.50 0.38 1.54
    5d 3-Cl 1.36 2.36 2.23 1.01 2.85
    5e 3-Cl-4-F 0.75 2.92 0.60 0.65 2.44
    5f 4-CH3 3.34 6.29 3.62 1.98 2.39
    Foretinib --- 0.032 0.86 0.94 0.39 0.75
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 5.  Physicochemical Properties and ADME Properties of Target Compounds

    Compd. MW
    (g/mol)
    < 500
    H-bond
    acceptors
    < 10
    H-bond
    donors
    < 5
    Log P
    o/w
    < 5
    Violation
    Lipinski
    Rule of 5
    aPSA
    (Ų)
    ≤140
    Rotatable bonds
    < 10
    bBBB cGI dBS
    5a 456.47 6 3 3.94 0 101.06 9 NO Low 0.55
    5b 474.46 7 3 4.13 0 101.06 9 NO Low 0.55
    5c 490.92 6 3 4.46 0 101.06 9 NO Low 0.55
    5d 490.92 6 3 4.41 0 101.06 9 NO Low 0.55
    5e 508.91 7 3 4.66 1 101.06 9 NO Low 0.55
    5f 470.50 6 3 4.12 0 101.06 9 NO Low 0.55
    Foretinib 632.65 10 2 4.80 1 111.25 14 NO Low 0.55
    aPSA – polar surface area. bBBB – blood-brain barrier. cGI – gastrointestinal absorption. dBS – bioavailability score.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  1
  • 文章访问数:  308
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2022-02-20
  • 收稿日期:  2021-06-10
  • 接受日期:  2021-08-10
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章