Citation: Jianqiang Zheng,  Yongbin Huang,  Wencan Ming,  Yingju Liu. Intelligent Reaction Optimization: Synthesis of Acetylsalicylic Acid Driven by Deep Learning and Optimization Algorithms[J]. University Chemistry, ;2025, 40(9): 87-98. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202411062 shu

Intelligent Reaction Optimization: Synthesis of Acetylsalicylic Acid Driven by Deep Learning and Optimization Algorithms

  • Corresponding author: Yingju Liu, yingjuliu@scau.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 19 November 2024
    Accepted Date: 14 February 2025

  • Undergraduate experimental design typically requires extensive trial-and-error experimentation to identify optimal reaction conditions, a process that demands considerable time and resources. To simplify this complex experimental design process and to enhance students’ interest in advanced technologies and interdisciplinary fields, an intelligent reaction optimization model framework was introduced. This model is designed to predict the optimal combination of reaction conditions for achieving the highest yield, and this framework has been integrated into the undergraduate organic chemistry curriculum, specifically for the synthesis of acetylsalicylic acid. Herein, 1054 reaction data points were collected conforming to this reaction mechanism as training data for the model, mainly including product, reactant, catalyst, solvent, the main reaction reagents, reaction temperature and yield. Initially, a yield prediction model was pre-trained based on a chemical multi-modal transformer, which served as the objective function for subsequent reaction optimization. Then the Bayesian optimization algorithm was utilized to ascertain the optimal combination of reaction conditions, with the aim of minimizing the negative value of the yield (the maximizing yield). Finally, the model-predicted yields were experimentally validated against the actual yields, and in 100 model tests, the predicted yields consistently fell within the range of the actual yields, demonstrating the model’s excellent performance. The model also identified a reaction reagent combination that yielded up to 90.1%, providing a variety of experimental options for this undergraduate experiment.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Shields, B. J.; Stevens, J.; Li, J.; Parasram, M.; Damani, F.; Alvarado Martinez, J. I.; Janey, J. M.; Adams, R. P.; Doyle, A. G. Nature 2021, 590 (7844), 89.

    2. [2]

      Luo, Y.; Bag, S.; Zaremba, O.; Cierpka, A.; Andreo, J.; Wuttke, S.; Friederich, P.; Tsotsalas, M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61 (19), e202200242.

    3. [3]

      Wang, J. Y.; Stevens, J. M.; Kariofillis, S. K.; Tom, M. J.; Golden, D. L.; Li, J.; Tabora, J. E.; Parasram, M.; Shields, B. J.; Primer, D. N.; et al. Nature 2024, 626 (8001), 1025.

    4. [4]

    5. [5]

    6. [6]

    7. [7]

    8. [8]

    9. [9]

      SciFinder. [2024-08-15]. https://www.cas.org/

    10. [10]

      Reaxy. [2024-08-16]. https://www.reaxys.com/

    11. [11]

    12. [12]

    13. [13]

      Li, S. W.; Xu, L. C.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, S. Q.; Hong, X. Nat Commun. 2023, 14 (1), 3569.

    14. [14]

      Coley, C. W.; Thomas D. A.; Lummiss, J. A. M.; Jaworski, J. N.; Breen, C. P.; Schultz, V.; Hart, T.; Fishman, J. S.; Rogers, L.; Gao, H.; et al. Science 2019, 365 (6453), eaax1566.

    15. [15]

    16. [16]

      Lowe, D. M.; Corbett, P. T.; Murray-Rust, P.; Glen, R. C. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51 (3), 739.

    17. [17]

      Brochu, E.; Cora, V. M.; Freitas, N. D. 2010, arXiv:1012.2599. [2025-08-29]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1012.2599

    18. [18]

      Goh, G. B.; Hodas, N. O.; Siegel, C.; Vishnu, A. 2017, arXiv:1712.02034. [2025-08-29]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1712.02034

    19. [19]

      Durant, J. L.; Leland, B. A.; Henry, D. R.; Nourse, J. G. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42 (6), 1273.

    20. [20]

      Gedeck, P.; Rohde, B.; Bartels, C. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (5), 1924.

    21. [21]

      Rogers, D.; Hahn, M. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50 (5), 742.

    22. [22]

      Watson, P. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48 (1), 166.

    23. [23]

      David, W. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1988, 28 (1), 31.

    24. [24]

      RDKit: Open-source cheminformatics. [2025-08-29]. https://www.rdkit.org

    25. [25]

      Paszke, A.; Gross, S.; Massa, F.; Lerer, A.; Bradbury, J.; Chanan, G.; Killeen, T.; Lin, Z.; Gimelshein, N.; Antiga, L.; et al. 2019, arXiv:1912.01703. [2025-08-29]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703

    26. [26]

      Veličković, P.; Cucurull, G.; Casanova, A.; Romero, A.; Liò, P.; Bengio, Y. 2017, arXiv:1710.10903. [2025-08-29]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1710.10903

    27. [27]

      Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; Uszkoreit, J.; Jones, L.; Gomez, A. N.; Kaiser, L.; Polosukhin, I. 2017, arXiv:1706.03762. [2025-08-29]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762

    28. [28]

      Huang, Z.; Zeng, Z.; Liu, B.; Fu, D.; Fu, J. 2020, arXiv:2004.00849. [2025-08-29]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.00849

    29. [29]

      Kingma, D. P.; Ba, J. 2014, arXiv:1412.6980. [2025-08-29]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980

  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Lingyu Chang Yanfang Lang Yuyan Zhu Jie Wang Ying Guo Die Wang Peng Ding Yueming Zhou Zhixiang Gong Shujuan Liu . Machine Learning-Optimized Microcolumn Ion Exchange Chromatography for Trace Arsenic Determination. University Chemistry, 2026, 41(1): 76-84. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202506023

    2. [2]

      Ying LiangYuheng DengShilv YuJiahao ChengJiawei SongJun YaoYichen YangWanlei ZhangWenjing ZhouXin ZhangWenjian ShenGuijie LiangBin LiYong PengRun HuWangnan Li . Machine learning-guided antireflection coatings architectures and interface modification for synergistically optimizing efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(9): 100098-0. doi: 10.1016/j.actphy.2025.100098

    3. [3]

      Jiali CHENGuoxiang ZHAOYayu YANWanting XIAQiaohong LIJian ZHANG . Machine learning exploring the adsorption of electronic gases on zeolite molecular sieves. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2025, 41(1): 155-164. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.20240408

    4. [4]

      Jia Zhou Huaying Zhong . Experimental Design of Computational Materials Science Combined with Machine Learning. University Chemistry, 2025, 40(3): 171-177. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202406004

    5. [5]

      Xinghai LiZhisen WuLijing ZhangShengyang Tao . Machine Learning Enables the Prediction of Amide Bond Synthesis Based on Small Datasets. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2025, 41(2): 100010-0. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202309041

    6. [6]

      Jia Zhou . Design and Practice of a Comprehensive Computational Chemistry Experiment Based on High-Throughput Computation and Machine Learning. University Chemistry, 2025, 40(9): 69-75. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202411067

    7. [7]

      Zuoyong Li Haoxiang Tu Mingwei Ding Meijun Liu Ting Yang . Innovative Teaching Reform Study on the Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Based on Machine Learning and Microfluidic Technology. University Chemistry, 2026, 41(1): 64-75. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202505088

    8. [8]

      Heng Zhang Ying Ma Shiling Yuan . Machine Learning-based Prediction of Antifouling Performance in Polymer Materials: An Integrated Molecular Simulation Experiment. University Chemistry, 2026, 41(1): 346-353. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202506015

    9. [9]

      Jia Zhou . Constructing Potential Energy Surface of Water Molecule by Quantum Chemistry and Machine Learning: Introduction to a Comprehensive Computational Chemistry Experiment. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(3): 351-358. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202309060

    10. [10]

      Jingjie Rao Wenwen Cai Jiahui Zhao Xu Yang Ziyan Yan Tianjin Zhang Hang Zhang . Digital Exploration of Analytical Chemistry Experiments in the Context of Machine Learning and Big Data: A Case Study on Water Hardness Measurement. University Chemistry, 2026, 41(1): 276-288. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202504104

    11. [11]

      Songmei Ma Ying Zhang Gang Liu Wenlong Xu . Comprehensive Experiment Teaching Exploration and Practice in Polymeric Materials Integrating Research-Driven Learning, Creativity-Enhanced Competency, and Science-Education Synergy: A Case Study of Machine Learning-Assisted Intelligent Handwriting Recognition System. University Chemistry, 2026, 41(1): 289-297. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202509083

    12. [12]

      Yifan Xie Liyun Yao Ruolin Yang Yuxing Cai Yujie Jin Ning Li . Application of Comparative Pedagogy in Instrumental Analysis Experiment Teaching. University Chemistry, 2024, 39(3): 266-273. doi: 10.3866/PKU.DXHX202309068

    13. [13]

      Xiaochen ZhangFei YuJie Ma . Cutting-Edge Applications of Multi-Angle Numerical Simulations for Capacitive Deionization. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2024, 40(11): 2311026-0. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB202311026

    14. [14]

      Weigang Zhu Jianfeng Wang Qiang Qi Jing Li Zhicheng Zhang Xi Yu . Curriculum Development for Cheminformatics and AI-Driven Chemistry Theory toward an Intelligent Era. University Chemistry, 2025, 40(9): 34-42. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202412002

    15. [15]

      Yueming Zhou Xin Qiu Xin Zhou Xiaotian Wan Mofan Zhang Feng Li Xinxin Shao Peng Ding Xizhen Liang . Intelligent Visualization of Potassium Dichromate Reflux Method for Determination of Chemical Oxygen Demand. University Chemistry, 2026, 41(1): 85-94. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202506021

    16. [16]

      Zhican Lu Junyu Li Zijun Huang Ziyi Zeng Chi Huang Chuqing Gong Yalan Zhong . Digital Experimental Design of Decomposition of Ammonium Perchlorate Catalyzed by MOFs. University Chemistry, 2026, 41(1): 133-143. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202506017

    17. [17]

      Kai Ye Lizhong Zhang Mingyu Zhang Qinxiong Wu Kui Wang Qi Wang . Digital Experiment for the Determination of Liquid Saturated Vapor Pressure. University Chemistry, 2026, 41(1): 227-243. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202503107

    18. [18]

      Jiaqi Chen Liang Chen Xiaocui Wei Yankai Wang Yahui Chang Xinghao Ji Haoyu Yang Yue Sun Yawen Wang Xiufeng Shi Xu Wu . Digital Empowerment for Foundational Excellence: A Digitally Enhanced Coordination Titration Experiment of Heating Pack Component Analysis. University Chemistry, 2026, 41(1): 382-393. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202506008

    19. [19]

      Haifeng Ma Xiaocong Tian Fengbin Wang Zhonghua Xi QingWang . Design of College Chemistry Experiment Based on Product Quality Control: Taking “Optimization of Ferrous Fumarate Synthesis Process” as an Example. University Chemistry, 2025, 40(7): 321-327. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202409056

    20. [20]

      Qian Peng Pengfei Yao Zicong Wang Xiufang Xu Hongwei Sun . Promote the Training of Top Talents by Optimizing the Theoretical Computational Chemistry Curriculum System. University Chemistry, 2025, 40(5): 261-267. doi: 10.12461/PKU.DXHX202408012

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(1)
  • Abstract views(848)
  • HTML views(62)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Address:Zhongguancun North First Street 2,100190 Beijing, PR China Tel: +86-010-82449177-888
Powered By info@rhhz.net

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return