One-Pot Preparation of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalyst for Highly Efficient Degradation of Organic Pollution

Fang CHANG Ying-Jie ZHAO You-Ping SHOU Lu ZHANG Jiang-Nan WANG Ting-Ting SHI

Citation:  Fang CHANG, Ying-Jie ZHAO, You-Ping SHOU, Lu ZHANG, Jiang-Nan WANG, Ting-Ting SHI. One-Pot Preparation of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalyst for Highly Efficient Degradation of Organic Pollution[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2022, 38(9): 1862-1870. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2022.173 shu

一锅法制备S型异质结光催化剂Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5及其高效降解有机污染物性能

    通讯作者: 王江南, 914967941@qq.com
    石婷婷, 10761135@qq.com
  • 基金项目:

    中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目 TKS190408

    交通运输部天津水运工程科学研究所部门发展基金 KJFZJJ190201

    上海市科委科研计划项 19DZ1204303

摘要: 首次采用简单的一锅法制备了Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5异质结纳米材料。构建S型异质结后,与纯的Fe2O3和Fe2TiO5相比,Fe2O3/ Fe2TiO5复合材料表现出更高的光催化降解速率和效率。经过2.5 h的光照后,Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5可以降解接近100% 的亚甲基蓝(MB)。在Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5复合材料中,Fe2O3和Fe2TiO5之间形成了内建电场,可以促进光生电子-空穴对的分离。因此,具有更高能量的Fe2TiO5导带中的电子和具有更高能量的Fe2O3价带中的空穴可以得到有效的保留,从而使它们更加有效地扩散到催化剂表面,并参加降解反应。此外,Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5复合材料具有很好的光催化稳定性。

English

  • Water is one of the important resources that human beings depend on for survival and development. However, nearly a third of the population worldwide is estimated to lack access to safely managed drinking water services[1-2]. In the last years, water pollution is becoming a major concern due to novel and dangerous anthropogenic pollutants. Reducing the release of wastewater into the environment and degrading the contaminants from wastewater are important strategies for water environment purification[3-5].

    Many water treatment ways have been employed to degrade organic pollutants, such as physical absorption, biological purification, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), electrochemical processes, and photocatalytic degradation. Among them, photocatalytic degradation is a kind of AOPs. Compared to traditional AOPs, the active-oxidizing species HO· or ·O2- is in-situ produced by semiconductor photocatalysis[6-14]. Semiconductor photocatalysts can be excited by light with energy higher than their band gap values, and then generate electron-hole pairs. Hole-electron pairs separate and transfer to the photocatalyst surface, produce HO· or ·O2- , and then lead to the oxidation of organic pollutions. To obtain high photocatalytic efficiency, a semiconductor should have a small band gap enabling the utilization of a wide range of solar light[15-20]. Fe2O3 with a narrow band gap of ca. 2.0 eV, can absorb a large amount of visible sunlight. Besides, Fe2O3 has many other advantages, such as being lowcost, and non-toxic, making it a promising photocatalyst material. However, Fe2O3 exhibits low conductivity and over-positive conduction band position, which are adverse to its photocatalytic efficiency.

    Many strategies were employed to overcome these problems and improve photocatalytic efficiency on Fe2O3. Nano-engineering, intentional n-type doping, and electrocatalyst loading have been often used to improve charge separation efficiency or the surface oxidation rate[21-24]. Besides, constructing heterojunction with another semiconductor material is an effective way to improve the separation of electronhole pairs by the built-in electric field. This strategy has been successfully applied to many semiconductors[21-26], including BiVO4, WO3, TiO2, and so on.

    Constructing heterojunction between Fe2O3 particles and another semiconductor with a suitable band position benefits the separation of photo-generated carriers. Fe2TiO5 is such a semiconductor with a band gap of ca. 2.0 eV and similar to Fe2O3 while showing higher conduction and valence band levels, which can form staggered band positions with Fe2O3, therefore, effective step-scheme (S-scheme) heterojunction can be developed between Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5[27-29]. Moreover, Fe2TiO5 exhibits a high conduction band level located at ca.-0.2 eV vs reversible hydrogen electrode, making the composite materials propose the capacity to reduce O2 to ·O2- and further improve the photocatalytic properties. In previous reports, Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 composites were commonly applied in oxygen evolution[30-32], and rarely seen in pollution degradation[33]. The preparing Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 composite was mainly by an ion-exchange method, i.e. employing Fe2O3 or TiO2 as the substrate to inter-react with Ti or Fe precursors at high temperature[30, 32-33]. Yu and Waqas fabricated Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 composite utilizing sol-gel and calcination method[31, 34].

    In this work, for the first time, Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 composite materials were prepared by a one-pot solvothermal method. Compared to the pure Fe2O3 and pure Fe2TiO5, the photocatalytic properties toward removing methylene blue (MB) were significantly improved, which is mainly due to the promoted charge separation efficiency and the preserved higher-energy electrons from Fe2TiO5 caused by the S-scheme heterojunction.

    Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 heterojunction particles were fabricated by a solvothermal method. Firstly, 2.51 mmol Fe(NO3)3·9H2O was added to 50 mL isopropanol. Under stirring, 0.625 mmol of titanium isopropoxide was immediately added to the above solution. The precursor solution, after further being stirred for another 1 h, was transferred into a 100 mL Teflon-line stainless steel autoclave. Then the autoclave was sealed and heated in an oven at 150 ℃ for 12 h. After cooling down naturally, the prepared precipitates were washed with deionized water four times. As-prepared precipitates were dried at 80 ℃ overnight, then dried precipi-tates were annealed in air at 550 ℃ for 2 h and then 700 ℃ for 10 min. Then the Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 heterojunction particles were obtained.

    Fe2O3 was prepared by the same steps employed for Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 fabrication, except that only Fe(NO3)3·9H2O was added to the precursor solution without titanium isopropoxide. Fe2TiO5 was also prepared by this solvothermal method[31]. In the precursor solution, 2.51 mmol Fe(NO3)3·9H2O and 1.25 mmol of titanium isopropoxide were added in sequence. Other steps were the same as that of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 fabrication. The photoelectrodes based on the prepared Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 were also fabricated with the same process. Firstly, 10 mg of each sample was dispersed in 1 mL glycol. 20 μL solution was spin-coating on F-doped SnO2 coated glass (FTO), then another 20 μL solution was immediately dropped on the above FTO. After drying at 150 ℃ for 30 min, the film was calcined at 600 ℃ for 1 h.

    The crystal structures of the prepared samples were probed by a powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) on a Bruker diffractometer system, using Cu radiation (λ =0.154 18 nm) with a working voltage and current of 40 kV and 40 mA, respectively. The scan rate was 0.04 (°)·s-1 in a 2θ range of 5°-70°. The morphology test of the samples was carried out on a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM; JEOL, JSM-6700F with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV). The working voltage for SEM-EDS (EDS=energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy) mapping was 20 kV. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images were recorded on a transmission electron microscope (HT7700). Highresolution TEM (HRTEM) was conducted at 200 kV. The optical absorption spectra of the samples were performed on a UV-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, UV-Vis 2550). Electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) of the three photoelectrodes were measured at 0.9 V (vs RHE) using an electrochemical workstation (Shanghai Chenhua, 660E) with a 10 mV amplitude perturbation and frequencies between 0.1 Hz and 1 MHz.

    20 mg Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 was added into a 100 mL water solution with an MB concentration of 10 mg·L-1. After 40 min absorption, 3 mL solution was filtrated and taken for the test. Then the remained solution was stirred and irradiated under light with a power of 100 mW·cm-2. TThe area of the beaker exposed to the light was ca. 20 cm2. The light source used in this work was a 100 W LED lamp. The reaction solution was cooled by running water during the whole irradiating process to exclude the thermal effect. 3 mL solution was taken every 30 min. Current-potential curves were tested on an electrochemical workstation using a three-electrode system.

    To investigate the crystallinity and phase of asprepared samples, XRD was carried out (Fig. 1). All the peaks of the black curve at 24.2°, 33.3°, 35.7°, 40.9°, 49.5°, 54.1°, 57.6°, 62.4°, and 64.1° can be assigned to Fe2O3 (hematite, PDF No.33-0664), while all peaks of the red curve belong to the pseudobrookite Fe2TiO5 (PDF No.41-1432). The results indicate that Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5 have been successfully prepared. Both XRD peaks of Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5 were observed in Fe2O3/ Fe2 TiO5, demonstrating that Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 was obtained by the one-pot solvothermal method. Moreover, the high peak intensity of the three samples indicates their well crystalline nature. Note that the prepared Fe2O3/ Fe2TiO5 composite showed only two relatively low peaks at 18.1° and 25.6°. To evaluate the contents of Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5 in the composite, EDS has been performed. Elemental Ti was not observed in the pure Fe2O3, while in Fe2TiO5, both Fe and Ti were detected with an atomic ratio of 1.93 which is close to the Fe/Ti stoichiometric proportion in Fe2TiO5. In terms of Fe2O3/ Fe2TiO5 composite, the atomic ratio of Fe/Ti was 3.99, which is the same as the feed proportion, indicating the content of Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5 was equal in molar quantity. EDS mapping on the three samples has also been tested and the results are shown in Fig. 2. For Fe2O3/ Fe2 TiO5, Fe, O, and Ti were uniformly distributed in the sample, demonstrating that Fe2O3 or Fe2TiO5 can contact each other well.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  XRD patterns of Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  SEM-EDS element mapping images of (a) Fe2O3, (b) Fe2TiO5, and (c) Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5

    TEM was performed to further investigate the crystallinity and phase of the Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 composite. As shown in Fig. 3b-3d, elemental Fe was evenly distributed in the particles, while elemental Ti is mainly distributed on the particle surface and interface. HRTEM has also been measured and the results are shown in Fig. 3e and 3f. Fringe spacing of 0.251 and 0.247 nm can be indexed to the (110) plane of Fe2O3 and (301) plane of Fe2TiO5, especially, demonstrating the formation of heterojunction between Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5. In addition, Fe2O3 is well crystalline in the whole Fe2O3 sample, while the crystalline region in Fe2TiO5 is relatively small and enshrouded with an amorphous phase. This result indicates that Fe2TiO5 spreads over the surface of Fe2O3, and the crystallinity of Fe2TiO5 is restricted to some extent. Moreover, the TEM-EDS results suggest that the atomic ratio of Fe and Ti was ca. 5.6, which is larger than the feed proportion and SEM-EDS values. It is understandable considering that part of small Fe2TiO5 particles falls away from Fe2O3 during the ultrasonic process. Overall, the results of XRD, SEM-EDS, and TEM demonstrate that Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 heterojunction composites have been successfully prepared.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  TEM-EDS element mapping images (a-d), and HRTEM images (e, f) for Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5

    Light absorption properties show a great effect on the final photocatalytic degradation performance. Therefore, UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) of the prepared samples were measured to evaluate their absorption properties. The UV-Vis DRS results have been converted to absorption form using the Kubelka-Munk function as shown in Fig. 4a. Besides, the curves have been normalized. As shown in Fig. 4a, all samples exhibited absorption regions from UV to visible wavelengths. Fe2O3 exhibited the widest light absorption, while the absorption edge of Fe2TiO5 blue shift compared to Fe2O3 and proposed the narrowest light absorption region. While, from 500 to 600 nm, the absorption of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 was higher than that of Fe2TiO5 and smaller than the absorption of Fe2O3. The band gaps of Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3 /Fe2 TiO5 were estimated by drawing Tauc plots, which are shown in Fig. 4b. In the ordinate of the curves, n=2 represents the direct band gap, while n=1/2 represents the indirect band gap[13, 35]. As Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5 are indirect band gap semiconductors, n=1/2 was employed here to calculate their band gaps. The band gaps of the three samples were similar with the values of 2.05-2.08 eV, which match the previously reported values[31].

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  (a) Absorption spectra and (b) Tauc plots of Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5

    Morphologies of the prepared samples were analyzed by SEM. As shown in Fig. 5, all the samples show an ellipsoidal shape with uniform distribution. The particle size of the nanoparticles was less than 50 nm. The small particle size enables a large semiconductor/ solution interface, facilitating the injecting of photoexcited charges into the solution. In consideration of the similar shape and size of Fe2O3, Fe2 TiO5, and Fe2O3/ Fe2TiO5, their MB absorption amount should be a little different, which is following the MB absorption experiment.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  SEM images of (a) Fe2O3, (b) Fe2TiO5, and (c) Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5

    To evaluate the performance of Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5, the photocatalytic degradation of MB organic pollutants experiments was performed. 10 mg·L-1 MB aqueous solution was employed in this experiment, the concentration of the three samples was 20 mg per 100 mL MB aqueous solution. The filter for filtering Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 was saturated by MB first. After 40 min of adsorption-desorption equilibrium, the photocatalytic degradation experiment was carried out by exposing the illumination solution. 2 mL solution was taken out from the MB solution every 30 min using a disposable syringe with the filter. The MB degradation rates on Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/ Fe2 TiO5 are shown in Fig. 6a. Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 exhibited the highest degradation rate. The degradation efficiencies of the three samples were also calculated according to the formula of (c0-ct)/c0, where c0 is the initial concentration after adsorption-desorption equilibrium, ct is the concentration at t time. After 150 min irradiation, MB degradation efficiency of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 reached 98.4%, while the efficiencies of Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5 were just 50.9% and 62.9%, respectively. As discussed above, though the light absorption property of Fe2O3 was better than that of Fe2TiO5, their photocatalytic activity was similar. This is because the conduction band minimum (CBM) of Fe2TiO5 was higher and can reduce O2 to ·O2- , which provides another pathway for degradation, except for oxidizing MB by the hole in valence band maximum (VBM). Among the three samples, Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 presented the highest degradation rate and highest degradation efficiency. To further understand the photocatalytic degradation process, the data were fitted by a first-order kinetic equation, ln(c0 / ct)=kt, which is commonly used as a mode to analyze organic pollutant degradation[35]. The results are shown in Fig. 6b, and the degradation rate constant k was fitted from the slope of the line. The k value of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 was 2.787×10-2 min-1, which is significantly higher than that of Fe2O3 (5.06×10-3 min-1) and Fe2TiO5 (7.47×10-3 min-1).

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  (a) Degradation performance of MB over the different samples; (b) Plots of ln(c0/ct) vs illuminated time; (c) Stability of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 on MB degradation

    To evaluate the stability of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5, cycle tests for the photocatalytic degradation of MB were tested. The solid particles should be relatively evenly dispersed in the solution after ultrasonic dispersion before the reaction and agitation during the reaction. Moreover, the intermediate solution was taken each time. Therefore, after the first cycle, since the 10 mL solution has been taken out, ca. 1/10 of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 has also been taken out along with the solution. Therefore, we just added MB into the remained 90 mL solution to keep MB and the catalyst concentrations still at 10 and 0.2 mg·mL-1, respectively. As shown in Fig. 6c, compared with the 1st cycle, although the degradation rates of the 2nd and 3rd cycles slightly decreased, degradation rates were still high. This result indicates the high stability of as-synthesized Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 composite material.

    Photocatalytic performance highly depends on light absorption of the semiconductor and charge separation in the bulk semiconductor. As discussed above, the light absorption property of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 was not the best, the highest photocatalytic property of Fe2O3/ Fe2TiO5 must result from the significantly improved charge separation efficiency. Moreover, in Fe2O3/ Fe2TiO5, besides the preserved higher-energy holes from Fe2O3 which oxidize MB, the preserved higher-energy electrons from Fe2TiO5 which provide another pathway for MB degradation.

    To verify the mechanism proposed above, photo-electrodes based on Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 were prepared to evaluate their separation efficiency of the photogenerated charge carriers. The photoelectrodes were tested in a three-electrode system, where photoelectrode was used as a working electrode, Ag/ AgCl was used as a reference electrode, and Pt was used as the counter electrode. The scan rate was 30 mV·s-1. The electrolyte was 1 mol·L-1 NaOH. As shown in Fig. 7, the Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 photoelectrode presented significantly higher photocurrents than that of Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5. The significantly increased photocurrent density of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 can be attributed to the higher charge separation efficiency due to the formed heterojunction between Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5[27].

    Figure 7

    Figure 7.  Chopped current vs potential curves on Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 photoelectrodes

    EIS was also conducted to confirm the charge transport properties of the three samples. As shown in Fig. 8, the Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 photoelectrode exhibited the smallest diameter, indicating the faster charge transfer kinetics in the film. This phenomenon can be attributed to the build-in field induced by the heterojunction between Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5 since the built-in field can facilitate the separation of electron-hole pairs. It should be pointed out that the charge transfer resistance of Fe2O3 is smaller than that of Fe2TiO5, which is consistent with the reported result[36].

    Figure 8

    Figure 8.  Nyquist plots of the Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 photoelectrodes

    A possible mechanism for photocatalytic degradation of MB by Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 is illuminated in Fig. 9. Fe2TiO5 has higher CBM and VBM levels than that Fe2O3. Under irradiation, Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5 absorb light and generate electron-hole pairs, respectively. An S-scheme heterojunction[37] is formed between Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5. In this S-scheme heterojunction, electrons in CBM of Fe2O3 and holes in VBM of Fe2TiO5 can recombination with each other, while holes in VB of Fe2O3 and electrons in CBM of Fe2TiO5 separate and transfer to Fe2O3/solution and Fe2TiO5/solution surface, respectively. Due to the recombination electrons presenting relatively lower energy, the preserved electrons with higher energy in Fe2TiO5 can reduce O2 to ·O2- , and then produce ·OH, which can degrade MB effec-tively. While the reserved holes in Fe2O3 can degrade MB directly. Therefore, the Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 heterojunction can remove MB more effectively.

    Figure 9

    Figure 9.  Schematic diagram of charge carrier transfer process and possible photocatalytic mechanism of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5

    In summary, Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 have been prepared by a facile one-pot solvothermal method. In Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5, Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5 can form S-scheme heterojunction, and thus promotes the electrons in CB of Fe2TiO5 and holes in VB of Fe2O3 transfer to the surface. In this way, carriers with higher ener-gy were preserved. Compared to Fe2O3 and Fe2TiO5, the photocatalytic degradation rate and efficiency of Fe2O3/ Fe2TiO5 were significantly improved. This approach provides a facile way to achieve Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 S-scheme heterojunction materials and can offer a reference to construct heterojunction on other materials.


    Acknowledgments: The National Nonprofit Institute Research Grants of TIWTE (Grant No.TKS190408), Science and Technology Development Fund of Tianjin Waterway Engineering Research Institute, Ministry of Transport (Grant No. KJFZJJ190201), and Scientific Research Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (Grant No.19DZ1204303).
    1. [1]

      Zodrow K R, Li Q L, Buono R M, Chen W, Daigger G, Duenas-Osorio L, Elimelech M, Huang X, Jiang G, Kim J, Logan B, Sedlak D, Westerhoff P, Alvarez P J. Advanced Materials, Technologies, and Complex Systems Analyses: Emerging Opportunities to Enhance Urban Water Security[J]. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2017, 51:  10274-10281. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01679

    2. [2]

      McDonald R I, Green P, Balk D, Fekete B, Revenga C, Todd M, Montgomery M. Urban Growth, Climate Change, and Freshwater Availability[J]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2011, 108:  6312-6317. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011615108

    3. [3]

      Peter-Varbanets M, Zurbrügg C, Swartz C, Pronk W. Decentralized Systems for Potable Water and the Potential of Membrane Technology[J]. Water Res., 2009, 43:  245-265. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.10.030

    4. [4]

      Schwarzenbach R P, Esscher B I, Fenner K, Johnson C, Gunten U. The Challenge of Micropollutants in Aquatic Systems[J]. Science, 2006, 313:  1072-1077. doi: 10.1126/science.1127291

    5. [5]

      Hodges B C, Cates E L, Kim J H. Challenges and Prospects of Advanced Oxidation Water Treatment Processes Using Catalytic Nanomaterials[J]. Nat. Nanotechnol., 2018, 13:  642-650. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0216-x

    6. [6]

      Cheng M, Zeng G M, Huang D L, Lai C, Liu Y, Zhang C, Wan J, Hu L, Zhou C, Xiong W. Efficient Degradation of Sulfamethazine in Simulated and Real Wastewater at Slightly Basic pH Values Using Co-SAM-SCS/H2O2 Fenton-like System[J]. Water Res., 2018, 138:  7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.022

    7. [7]

      Diugosz M, Zmudzki P, Kwiecien A, Szczubiaika K, Krzek J, Nowakowska M. Photocatalytic Degradation of Sulfamethoxazole in Aqueous Solution Using a Floating TiO2- Expanded Perlite Photocatalyst[J]. J. Hazard. Mater., 2015, 298:  146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.016

    8. [8]

      Zhu L L, Ji J H, Liu L, Mine S, Matsuoka M, Zhang J L, Xing M Y. Designing 3D-MoS2 Sponge as Excellent Cocatalysts in Advanced Oxidation Processes for Pollutant Control[J]. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59:  13968-13976. doi: 10.1002/anie.202006059

    9. [9]

      Yi Q Y, Ji J H, Shen B, Dong C C, Liu J, Zhang J L, Xing M Y. Singlet Oxygen Triggered by Superoxide Radicals in a Molybdenum Cocatalytic Fenton Reaction with Enhanced REDOX Activity in the Environment[J]. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2019, 53:  9725-9733. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01676

    10. [10]

      Maji T K, Bagchi D, Kar P, Karmakar D, Pal S. Enhanced Charge Separation through Modulation of Defect-State in Wide Band-Gap Semiconductor for Potential Photocatalysis Application: Ultrafast Spectroscopy and Computational Studies[J]. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 2017, 332:  391-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.09.017

    11. [11]

      Sheng J P, He Y, Li J Y, Yuan C, Huang H, Wang S, Sun Y, Wang Z, Dong F. Identification of Halogen-Associated Active Sites on Bismuth-Based Perovskite Quantum Dots for Efficient and Selective CO2- To-CO Photoreduction[J]. ACS Nano, 2020, 14:  13103-13114. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c04659

    12. [12]

      Hu Z, Li K N, Wu X F, Wang N, Li X, Li Q, Li L, Lv K. Dramatic Promotion of Visible-Light Photoreactivity of TiO2 Hollow Microspheres towards NO Oxidation by Introduction of Oxygen Vacancy[J]. Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2019, 256:  117860. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117860

    13. [13]

      Guediri M K, Chebli D, Bouguettoucha A, Bourzami R, Amrane A. Novel Fe2TiO5/Reduced Graphene Oxide Heterojunction Photocatalyst with Improved Adsorption Capacity and Visible Light Photoactivity: Experimental and DFT Approach[J]. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2021, 28:  8507-8519. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11221-0

    14. [14]

      Dong S Y, Cui L F, Zhang W, Xia L, Zhou S, Russell C, Fan M, Feng J, Sun J. Double-Shelled ZnSnO3 Hollow Cubes for Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Antibiotic Wastewater[J]. Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 384:  123279. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123279

    15. [15]

      Sivula K, Le Formal F, Grätzel M. Solar Water Splitting: Progress Using Hematite (α-Fe2O3) Photoelectrodes[J]. ChemSusChem, 2011, 4:  432-449. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201000416

    16. [16]

      Solarska R, Królikowska A, Augustyński J. Silver Nanoparticle Induced Photocurrent Enhancement at WO3 Photoanodes[J]. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2010, 49:  7980-7983. doi: 10.1002/anie.201002173

    17. [17]

      Cao D P, Wang J, Zhang J B, Liu S, Xu F, Xu S, Xu X, Mi B, Gao Z. Mechanism Investigation of the Postnecking Treatment to WO3 Photoelectrodes[J]. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2018, 1:  4670-4677. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.8b00805

    18. [18]

      Meng L X, Tian W, Wu F L, Cao F, Li L. TiO2 ALD Decorated CuO/ BiVO4 pn Heterojunction for Improved Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2019, 35:  1740-1746. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.03.008

    19. [19]

      Xu Z Q, Guan Z J, Yang J J, Li Q. Band Positions and Photoelectrochemical Properties of Solution-Processed Silver-Substituted Cu2ZnSnS4 Photocathode[J]. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2019, 2:  2779-2785. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b00116

    20. [20]

      Feng J Y, Huang H T, Fang T, Wang X, Yan S, Luo W, Yu T, Zhao Y, Li Z, Zou Z. Defect Engineering in Semiconductors: Manipulating Nonstoichiometric Defects and Understanding Their Impact in Oxynitrides for Solar Energy Conversion[J]. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2019, 29:  1808389. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201808389

    21. [21]

      Cao D P, Yin H M, Yu X H, Zhang J, Jiao Y, Zheng W, Mi B, Gao Z. Role of Modifying Photoanodes by Organic Titanium on Charge Collection Efficiency Enhancement in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells[J]. Adv. Eng. Mater., 2020, 22:  1901071. doi: 10.1002/adem.201901071

    22. [22]

      Zhang Z J, Karinata I, Nagashima H, Moto S, Ohara K, Sugimoto K, Tachikawa T. Interfacial Oxygen Vacancies Yielding Long-Lived Holes in Hematite Mesocrystal-Based Photoanodes[J]. Nat. Commun., 2019, 10:  4832. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12581-z

    23. [23]

      Yu X L, Liu J Q, Yin W C, Wang T, Quan L, Ran Y, Cui J, Wang L, Zhang Y. Ultrathin NiMn-Layered Double Hydroxide Nanosheets Coupled with α-Fe2O3 Nanorod Arrays for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting[J]. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 492:  264-271. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.162

    24. [24]

      Lee H, Kim K H, Choi W H, Moon B, Kong H, Kang J. Cobalt-Phosphate Catalysts with Reduced Bivalent Co-Ion States and Doped Nitrogen Atoms Playing as Active Sites for Facile Adsorption, Fast Charge Transfer, and Robust Stability in Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation[J]. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11:  44366-44374. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b16523

    25. [25]

      Cao D P, Zhang J B, Wang A C, Yu X H, Mi B X. Fabrication of Cr-Doped SrTiO3/Ti-Doped α-Fe2O3 Photoanodes with Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Properties[J]. J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2020, 56:  189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.025

    26. [26]

      Cao D P, Wang A C, Yu X H, Yin H, Zhang J, Mi B, Gao Z. Room-Temperature Preparation of TiO2/Graphene Composite Photoanodes for Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells[J]. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2021, 586:  326-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.096

    27. [27]

      Li C C, Wang T, Luo Z B, Liu S, Gong J. Enhanced Charge Separation through ALD-Modified Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 Nanorod Heterojunction for Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation[J]. Small, 2016, 25:  3415-3422.

    28. [28]

      Regue M, Ahmet I Y, Bassi P S, Johnson A, Fiechter S, Krol R, Abdi F, Eslava S. Zn-Doped Fe2TiO5 Pseudobrookite-Based Photoanodes Grown by Aerosol-Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition[J]. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2020, 3:  12066-12077. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.0c02190

    29. [29]

      Bassi P S, Chiam S Y, Gurudayal , Barber J, Wong L. Hydrothermal Grown Nanoporous Iron Based Titanate, Fe2TiO5 for Light Driven Water Splitting[J]. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6:  22490-22495. doi: 10.1021/am5065574

    30. [30]

      Xiao Y, Lv X X, Feng K, Lu C, Li H T, Zhong J, Deng J J. Water-Soluble Peroxotitanium Complex: A Novel Strategy to Prepare Fe2O3/ Fe2TiO5 Photoanode with Enhanced Water Oxidation[J]. J. Alloy. Compd., 2022, 898:  162930. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162930

    31. [31]

      Waqas M. Fe2TiO5 /Fe2O3 (Shell/Shell) and (Shell/Core) Heterostructured for Efficient Oxygen Evolution[J]. Inorg. Chem., 2021, 60(17):  13461-13470. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01789

    32. [32]

      Bassi P S, Antony R P, Boix P P, Fang Y N, Barber J, Wong L H. Crystalline Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 Heterojunction Nanorods with Efficient Charge Separation and Hole Injection as Photoanode for Solar Water Oxidation[J]. Nano Energy, 2016, 22:  310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.013

    33. [33]

      Deng Y X, Xing M Y, Zhang J L. An Advanced TiO2/Fe2TiO5/Fe2O3 Triple-Heterojunction with Enhanced and Stable Visible-Light-Driven Fenton Reaction for the Removal of Organic Pollutants[J]. Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2017, 211:  157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.04.037

    34. [34]

      Yu R, Li Z, Wang D, Lai X, Xing C, Yang M, Xing X. Fe2 TiO5/α-Fe2O3 Nanocomposite Hollow Spheres with Enhanced Gas-Sensing Properties[J]. Scr. Mater., 2010, 63(2):  155-158. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.043

    35. [35]

      Kannan K, Radhika D, Nikolova M P, Sadasivuni K, Mahdizadeh H, Verma U. Structural Studies of Bio-mediated NiO Nanoparticles for Photocatalytic and Antibacterial Activities[J]. Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2020, 113:  107755. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2019.107755

    36. [36]

      Lee D K, Lee D, Lumley M A, Choi K S. Progress on Ternary Oxide-Based Photoanodes for Use in Photoelectrochemical Cells for Solar Water Splitting[J]. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2019, 48:  2126-2157. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00761F

    37. [37]

      Xu Q L, Zhang L Y, Cheng B, Fan J J, Yu J G. S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalyst[J]. Chem, 2020, 6:  1543-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.010

  • Figure 1  XRD patterns of Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5

    Figure 2  SEM-EDS element mapping images of (a) Fe2O3, (b) Fe2TiO5, and (c) Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5

    Figure 3  TEM-EDS element mapping images (a-d), and HRTEM images (e, f) for Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5

    Figure 4  (a) Absorption spectra and (b) Tauc plots of Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5

    Figure 5  SEM images of (a) Fe2O3, (b) Fe2TiO5, and (c) Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5

    Figure 6  (a) Degradation performance of MB over the different samples; (b) Plots of ln(c0/ct) vs illuminated time; (c) Stability of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 on MB degradation

    Figure 7  Chopped current vs potential curves on Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 photoelectrodes

    Figure 8  Nyquist plots of the Fe2O3, Fe2TiO5, and Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5 photoelectrodes

    Figure 9  Schematic diagram of charge carrier transfer process and possible photocatalytic mechanism of Fe2O3/Fe2TiO5

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  1
  • 文章访问数:  142
  • HTML全文浏览量:  13
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2022-09-10
  • 收稿日期:  2022-03-22
  • 修回日期:  2022-07-01
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章