

噻吩和吡啶取代三芳基三唑的两个铜配合物的合成与晶体结构
English
Syntheses and Crystal Structures of Two Copper Complexes Based on Thienyl and Pyridyl Substituted Triaryltriazoles
-
Key words:
- synthesis
- / Cu(Ⅱ) complex
- / crystal structure
- / triaryltriazole
-
0. Introduction
Over the past few decades, 3, 4, 5-triarylsubstituted 1, 2, 4-triazoles have attracted considerable attention in coordination chemistry[1] because these triazole derivatives can be used as flexible bridging ligands and linkers between transition metal ions[2-5]. In particular, some Fe (Ⅱ) complexes with substituted triazoles can show fascinating spin crossover properties and may find potential applications in molecular switches, display devices, sensors and data storages[6-9]. In our previous work, a series of 3, 4, 5-triarylsubstituted 1, 2, 4-triazoles with the pyridyl, phenyl, pyrrolyl, imidazolyl, benzimidazolyl and quinolyl groups and their metal complexes have been reported[10-24]. However, only a Co(Ⅱ) complex with thienyl substituted triaryltriazoles has been reported until now[25-26]. As a continuation of our exploration of asymmetrically substituted 1, 2, 4-triazoles, we prepared two new triaryltriazoles with a thienyl group: 3-(2-pyridyl)-4-phenyl-5-(2-thienyl)-1, 2, 4-triazole (L1) and 3-(2-pyridyl)-4-(p-chlorophenyl)-5-(2-thienyl)-1, 2, 4-triazole (L2) (Scheme 1). Herein we report the syntheses, crystal structures and spectral characterization of two mononuclear copper(Ⅱ) complexes based on the designed ligands: trans-[Cu(L1)2(MeOH)2] (ClO4)2 (1) and trans-[Cu(L2)2(ClO4)2]·2MeCN (2).
Scheme 1
1. Experimental
1.1 Materials and measurements
All chemicals and solvents purchased were of analytical grade. Solvents were purified by conventional methods. Melting points were determined with an X - 4 digital microscope melting - point apparatus (Beijing) and are uncorrected. Elemental analyses (C, H, N, S) were carried out with a Thermo Finnigan Flash 1112A elemental analyzer. FT - IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet Avatar 380 FT -IR instrument using KBr disks from 4 000 to 400 cm-1. 1H NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker AM 400 MHz spectrometer in DMSO-d6 solution. Electrospray ionization mass spectra (ESI- MS) were recorded with a LCQ ADVANTAGE MAX mass spectrometer. Powder X - ray diffraction (PXRD) data were collected on a Bruker D8 ADVANCE diffrac- tometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ =0.154 06 nm) at 40 kV and 40 mA in a range of 5°~50°.
1.2 Characterization of ligands L1 and L2
Ligands L1 and L2 were synthesized based on our reported method[21].
3-(2-pyridyl)-4-phenyl-5-(2-thienyl)-1, 2, 4-triazole (L1): m.p. 201~203 ℃. Anal. Calcd. for C17H12N4S (%): C, 67.08; H, 3.97; N, 18.41; S, 10.53. Found (%): C, 67.34; H, 4.24; N, 18.65; S, 10.81. IR (KBr, cm-1): 3 072(w), 1 585(m), 1 489(s), 1 438(m), 1 002(m), 798 (m), 722(m). 1H NMR (400 MHz): δ 8.31(d, 1H, Py-H), 8.03(d, 1H, Py-H), 7.91(t, 1H, Py-H), 7.66(d, 1H, thie- nyl-H), 7.54(t, 1H, Ph-H), 7.51(d, 2H, Ph-H), 7.47(d, 2H, Ph-H), 7.35(t, 1H, Py-H), 7.01(d, 1H, thienyl-H), 6.71(d, 1H, thienyl-H). ESI-MS: m/z=305.08, [L1+H]+.
3-(2-pyridyl)-4-(p-chlorophenyl)-5-(2-thienyl)-1, 2, 4- triazole (L2): m. p. 192~194 ℃. Anal. Calcd. for C17H11N4SCl(%): C, 60.26; H, 3.27; N, 16.54; S, 9.46. Found(%): C, 60.42; H, 3.42; N, 16.39; S, 9.72. IR (KBr, cm-1): 3 054(w), 1 590(m), 1 498(s), 1 443(s), 1 089(m), 997(m), 841(m), 721(m). 1H NMR (400 MHz): δ 8.33(d, 1H, Py-H), 8.08(d, 1H, Py-H), 7.93(t, 1H, Py-H), 7.69(d, 1H, thienyl-H), 7.59(d, 2H, Ph-H), 7.57(d, 2H, Ph-H), 7.36(t, 1H, Py-H), 7.06(t, 1H, thienyl- H), 6.83(d, 1H, thienyl-H). ESI-MS: m/z=339.05, [L2+H]+.
1.3 Syntheses of complexes 1 and 2
trans-[Cu(L1)2(MeOH)2] (ClO4)2 (1): A solution of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (0.05 mmol) and NaClO4 (0.1 mmol) in anhydrous MeOH (4 mL) was added to a solution of L1 (0.1 mmol) in MeOH (4 mL). The mixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature. The green precipitate was separated by filtration, and washed with water, then dried under vacuum to obtain complex 1 in a yield of 82%. The green block-shaped single crystals of 1 suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained by slow evaporation from MeOH solution. Anal. Calcd. for C36H32Cl2CuN8O10S2(%): C, 46.23; H, 3.45; N, 11.98; S, 6.86. Found(%): C, 46.52; H, 3.51; N, 11.77; S, 6.54. IR (KBr, cm-1): 3 449(m, b), 3 082(w), 2 917(w), 1 617 (w), 1 562(m), 1 493(s), 1 388(m), 1 112(vs), 929(w), 859(w), 731(m), 626(s).
trans-[Cu(L2)2(ClO4)2] ·2MeCN (2): The prepared procedure for 2 was the same as that for 1 except using L2 (0.1 mmol) to replace L1. The well-shaped single crystals of 2 suitable for X -ray diffraction were obtained by slow evaporation from MeCN solution. Yield: 87%. Anal. Calcd. for C38H28Cl4CuN10O8S2(%): C, 44.65; H, 2.76; N, 13.70; S, 6.27. Found(%): C, 44.27; H, 2.93; N, 13.82; S, 6.41. IR (KBr, cm-1): 3 077 (w), 2 921(w), 2 347(w), 1 613(m), 1 566(m), 1 493(s), 1 114(vs), 1 098(s), 930(w), 859(m), 726(m), 621(s).
1.4 Crystal structure determination
Suitable single crystals of 1 and 2 were selected for lattice parameter determination and collection of intensity data on a Bruker SMART APEX Ⅱ CCD diffractometer with a graphite - monochromated Mo Kα(λ=0.071 073 nm) radiation using a φ-ω scan mode at 296(2) K. Multi-scan absorption corrections were applied to all intensity data using SADABS. The structures were solved by direct methods and refined on F2 by full-matrix least squares procedures using SHELXTL software[27]. All non-hydrogen atoms were anisotropically refined. All hydrogen atoms were fixed in calculated positions and refined isotropically. The ClO4- ions in 1 were disordered over two positions with an occupancy of 0.677(14) for O2, O3, O4 and O5 and 0.323(14) for O2A, O3A, O4A and O5A. The two O atoms of coordinated ClO4- in 2 were also disordered over two positions with an occupancy of 0.548(7) for O2 and O3 and 0.452(7) for O2A and O3A. The crystallographic data of 1 and 2 are summarized in Table 1 and the selected bond lengths and angles are given in Table 2.
Table 1
Complex 1 2 Empirical formula C36H32Cl2CuN8O10S2 C38H28Cl4CuN10O8S2 Formula weight 935.25 1 022.16 Crystal system Monoclinic Monoclinic Space group P21/c P21/c a/nm 0.846 57(19) 0.830 66(11) b/nm 1.547 9(4) 1.541 0(2) c /nm 1.566 7(4) 3.404 6(5) β/(°) 98.002(3) 93.925(2) V /nm3 2.033 0(8) 4.347 8(10) Z 2 4 Dc/(g·cm-3) 1.528 1.562 μ/mm-1 0.838 0.908 F(000) 958 2 076 Crystal size/mm 0.17×0.13×0.09 0.15×0.12×0.09 θrange/ (°) 1.86~25.00 1.20~25.00 Reflection collected 14 399 30 959 Independent reflection 3 569 (Rint=0.033 3) 7 645 (Rint=0.033 9) Reflection observed [I > 2σ(I)] 2 877 6 127 Data, restraint, parameter 3 569, 67, 306 7 645, 30, 589 Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.066 1.071 R1, wR2[I > 2σ(I)] 0.039 3, 0.102 5 0.050 7, 0.135 8 R1, wR2(all data) 0.053 0, 0.108 8 0.064 9, 0.143 6 (Δρ)max, (Δρ)min/(e·nm-3) 409, -332 654, -471 Table 2
1 Cu1-N1 0.205 6(2) Cu1-N2 0.198 4(2) Cu1-O1 0.240 6(2) N2-N3 0.138 2(3) S1-C8 0.171 7(3) S1-C11 0.170 0(4) N1-Cu1-N2 79.42(9) N1-Cu1-O1 84.20(9) N2-Cu1-O1 92.75(9) C1-N1-Cu1 126.4(18) C5-N1-Cu1 115.5(17) C6-N2-Cu1 115.3(3) 2 Cu1-N1 0.205 3(3) Cu1-N2 0.197 4(3) Cu1-O1 0.252 9(3) Cu1-N5 0.205 3(3) Cu1-N6 0.196 7(5) Cu1-O5 0.242 8(3) N2-N3 0.137 2(4) S1-C8 0.170 6(4) C15-Cl1 0.173 4(4) N6-N7 0.137 3(2) S2-C25 0.171 2(4) C32-Cl2 0.174 0(4) N1-Cu1-N2 80.46(11) N1-Cu1-O1 86.45(13) N2-Cu1-O1 89.08(12) N5-Cu1-N6 80.09(8) N5-Cu1-O5 91.69(7) N6-Cu1-O5 90.74(11) C1-N1-Cu1 127.4(2) C5-N1-Cu1 114.0(2) C6-N2-Cu1 113.8(2) C18-N5-Cu1 127.12(5) C22-N5-Cu1 114.49(8) C23-N6-Cu1 115.0(5) CCDC: 2423470, 1; 2423471, 2.
2. Results and discussion
2.1 Synthesis
Asymmetrically thienyl substituted 3, 4, 5-triaryl-1, 2, 4-triazoles (L1 and L2) reacted with Cu(NO3)2 ·3H2O and NaClO4 in molar ratio of 2: 1: 2 to lead the formation of two mononuclear complexes, trans-[Cu(L1)2 (MeOH)2](ClO4)2 (1) and trans-[Cu(L2)2 (ClO4)2]·2MeCN (2), which are stable in air. The yields for 1 and 2 were 82% and 87%, respectively. The elemental analyses were satisfactory and indicate that 1 contains one Cu(Ⅱ), two L1 ligands, two MeOH molecules and two ClO4- ions, and 2 has one Cu(Ⅱ), two L2 ligands, two MeCN molecules and two ClO4- anions.
2.2 Crystal structures of 1 and 2
Although both 1 and 2 crystallize in the monoclinic space group P21/c (Fig. 1), Z=2 and c=1.566 7(4) nm in 1 while Z=4 and c=3.404 6(5) nm in 2. Thus, there is an inversion center at the Cu(Ⅱ) ion in 1 but none occurs in 2. The asymmetric unit of 1 is composed of half Cu(Ⅱ) cation, one L1 ligand, one coordinated MeOH molecule and one ClO4- anion, which is consistent with the elemental analysis result. The Cu1 ion of 1 is coordinated by four nitrogen atoms from two L1 ligands in the equatorial plane and two oxygen atoms from two MeOH molecules in the axial positions to form a distorted octahedral [CuN4O2] geometry. Each L1 ligand coordinates to Cu1 ion via N1 atom of the pyridyl and N2 atom of the triazole, similar to the coordinated modes in some related Cu(Ⅱ) complexes[14, 16, 24]. The thienyl group of L1 ligand does not take part in coordination, which is similar to the Co (Ⅱ) complex with a thienyl substituted triaryltriazole: trans-[CoL2(NCS)2] (L=3-(2-pyridyl)-4-(p-methoxyphenyl)-5-(2-thienyl)-1, 2, 4-triazole)[25]. However, the S1 atom of thienyl group in 1 does not orient to the phenyl ring, which is quite distinct from that observed in the trans-[CoL2(NCS)2] complex[25]. The distance of Cu1—O1 is 0.240 6(4) nm. The Cu—N bond lengths are within the normal ranges found for the octahedral Cu(Ⅱ) complexes[28-31]. Nevertheless, the Cu—N bond to the triazole nitrogen is 0.007 3 nm shorter than that to the pyridyl one. The analogous feature has been observed in the similar Cu(Ⅱ) complexes[24]. The ligand L1 in 1 is non - planar. The triazole makes dihedral angles of 6.2(4)°, 29.7(6)° and 64.6(3)° with the pyridyl ring, the thienyl ring and phenyl ring, respectively.
Figure 1
Different from 1, the asymmetric unit of 2 consists of a Cu(Ⅱ) cation, two L2 ligands, two ClO4- ions and two MeCN molecules. The Cu(Ⅱ) ion of 2 is coordinated by four nitrogen atoms from two L2 ligands in the equatorial plane and two oxygen atoms from two ClO4- in the axial positions to build a distorted octahedral [CuN 4O2] geometry. Each L2 ligand coordinates to Cu1 atom via N1 (or N5) atom of the pyridyl and N2 (or N6) atom of the triazole whereas the thienyl group of L2 ligand is also uncoordinated, which is very similar to the coordination mode of L1 in 1. The distance of Cu1—O1 (0.253 nm) is longer than that of the Cu1— O5 (0.242 8 nm). The Cu—N bond lengths are within the normal ranges observed for some octahedral Cu(Ⅱ) complexes, whereas Cu—N bond to the triazole nitrogen is 0.008 6 nm shorter than that to the pyridyl one. The triazole ring containing N2 atom forms dihedral angles of 2.4(2)°, 6.9(9)° and 89.2(8)° with the pyridyl ring with N1 atom, the thienyl ring with S1 atom and phenyl ring with Cl1 atom, respectively. And the triazole ring having N6 atom makes dihedral angles of 4.1(7)°, 9.6(4)° and 87.6(3)° with the pyridyl ring with N5 atom, the thienyl ring with S2 atom and phenyl ring with Cl2 atom, respectively. Therefore, the pyridyl, triazole and thienyl ring of L2 in 2 is almost coplanar. Notably, the S atoms (S1 and S2) of thienyl groups in 2 orient to the p-chlorophenyl ring, which is similar to that found in the trans-[CoL2(NCS)2] complex[25].
There are abundant intermolecular hydrogen bonds interactions in 1: (1) between MeOH and ClO4-anion (O1—H1A…O4); (2) between pyridyl and triazole ring (C1—H1…N3i); (3) between phenyl and ClO4-anion (C13—H13…O2iii and C17—H17…O2i); (4) between pyridyl and ClO4- anion (C3—H3…O5ii). In addition, there are an intramolecular edge - to - face C—H… π interaction involving C4—H4 and phenyl ring (H4…π 0.308 nm and ∠C4—H4…π =148°) and an intermolecular edge - to - face C—H… π interaction involving MeOH and pyridyl ring (H18C…π 0.326 nm and ∠C18—H18C… π=139°) (Fig. 2, Table 3). These interactions further connect the mononuclear 1 to form a 3D framework (Fig. 3).
Figure 2
Table 3
D-H…A d(D-H)/nm d(H…A)/nm d(D…A)/nm ∠D-H…A/(°) 1 O1-H1A…O4 0.086 0.203 0.279 6(6) 148 C1-H1…N3i 0.093 0.236 0.316 1(4) 144 C3-H3…O5ii 0.093 0.261 0.335 9(3) 138 C4-H4…π(Ph) 0.093 0.308 0.389 7(2) 148 C13-H13…O2iii 0.093 0.257 0.342 8(7) 154 C17-H17…O2i 0.093 0.260 0.349 2(8) 162 C18-H18C…π(Py) 0.096 0.326 0.402 9(8) 139 2 C1-H1…N7 0.093 0.233 0.310 2(5) 140 C2-H2…O2i 0.093 0.237 0.307 0(7) 131 C4-H4…π(Ph) 0.093 0.284 0.368 6(7) 152 C9-H9…O7ii 0.093 0.246 0.337 6(6) 168 C10-H10…N9iii 0.093 0.268 0.354 0(7) 154 C16-H16…O4iv 0.093 0.256 0.334 7(5) 142 C17-H17…O3iv 0.093 0.251 0.310 0(9) 122 C18-H18…N3 0.093 0.239 0.318 6(5) 143 C19-H19…O7ii 0.093 0.263 0.331 4(5) 130 C20-H20…O6v 0.093 0.258 0.350 8(7) 173 C21-H21…π(Ph) 0.093 0.302 0.384 6(6) 150 C26-H26…O1i 0.093 0.270 0.331 4(8) 123 C27-H27…N10vi 0.093 0.259 0.350 5(6) 168 Symmetry codes: i 1-x, 1-y, 1-z; ii 2-x, 1-y, 1-z; iii x, 1/2-y, 1/2+z for 1; i x-1, y, z; ii 1+x, y, z; iii 2-x, 1-y, 1-z; iv 1-x, y-1/2, 1.5-z; v 1-x, 1-y, 1-z; vi -x, 1-y, 1-z for 2. Figure 3
Complex 2 has richer C—H…O interactions including: (1) between pyridyl and ClO4- (C2—H2… O2i, C19—H19…O7ii and C20—H20…O6v); (2) between thienyl and ClO4- (C9—H9…O7ii and C26—H26…O1i); (3) between phenyl and ClO4- (C16—H16… O4iv and C17—H17…O3iv). There are two kinds of C—H…N interactions in 2 including: (1) between pyridyl and triazole (C1—H1…N7 and C18—H18…N3); (2) between thienyl and MeCN (C10— H10…N9iii and C27—H27…N10vi). In addition, there are two kinds of π - π stacking interactions between triazole rings and the MeCN molecules (π…π (C≡N9)v 0.331 6 nm, π…π (C≡N10)v 0.330 4 nm) (Table 3, Fig. 2). All the interactions assemble the mononuclear 2 into a 3D network (Fig. 3).
2.3 IR spectra
In the IR spectra of 1 and 2, a broad band at 3 447 cm-1 in 1 is due to the O—H stretching vibrations of MeOH, while a weak band at 2 347 cm-1 in 2 is assigned to characteristic C≡N stretching vibrations of MeCN[32]. A medium band at 1 562 cm-1 in 1 or 1 566 cm-1 in 2 can be assigned to the coordinated pyridyl ring vibrations. In 1 (or 2), the bands around 1 112 (or 1 114), 929 (or 930), 626 (or 621) cm-1 can be assigned to the IR-allowed ν mode, IR-forbidden ν mode and the non - degenerate ClO3 symmetrical bending frequency of the ClO4- anions, respectively[33]. Additionally, the stretching vibration of Cl - C(Ph) in 2 is found at 1 098 cm-1[34]. These features are in consistent with the X-ray analysis results.
2.4 PXRD
The PXRD patterns and simulated ones of 1 and 2 are shown in Fig. 4. The experimental patterns are in well agreement with the simulated ones from the single X -ray crystal data, revealing that the high phase purity of the bulk products of 1 and 2.
Figure 4
3. Conclusions
Two new Cu(Ⅱ) complexes based on the thienyl and pyridyl substituted triarytriazole, trans-[Cu(L1)2 (MeOH)2](ClO4) 2 (1) and trans-[Cu(L2)2(ClO4)2]·2MeCN (2), have been synthesized and characterized by IR, PXRD and X-ray crystallography. The structural analyses reveal that two complexes have a similar pseudooctahedral [CuN4O2] core with two MeOH molecules in the trans -positions in 1 but two ClO4- ions in the trans- positions in 2.
-
-
[1]
Gütlich P, Garcia Y, Goodwin H A. Chem. Soc. Rev. , 2000, 29(6): 419427
-
[2]
Gütlich P, Goodwin H A. Top. Curr. Chem. , 2004, 234(24): 49-58
-
[3]
朱敦如, 齐丽, 程慧敏, 沈旋, 卢伟. 化学进展, 2009, 21(6): 11871198 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJXU201502009.htmZHU D R, QI L, CHENG H M, SHEN X, LU W. Prog. Chem. , 2009, 21(6): 1187-1198 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJXU201502009.htm
-
[4]
Gaspar A B, Seredyuk M, Gütlich P. J. Mol. Struct. , 2009, 924-926: 9-19
-
[5]
Nihei M, Shiga T, Maeda Y, Oshio H. Coord. Chem. Rev. , 2007, 251(21/22/23/24): 2606-2621
-
[6]
Zhu D R, Xu Y, Yu Z, Guo Z J, Sang H, Liu T, You X Z. Chem. Mater. , 2002, 14(2): 838-843 doi: 10.1021/cm010688u
-
[7]
Jonathan A, Kitchen S B. Coord. Chem. Rev. , 2008, 252(18/19/20): 2072-2092
-
[8]
Moulin A, Bibian M, Blayo A L, Ei Habnouni S, Martinez J, Fehrentz J A. Chem. Rev. , 2010, 110(4): 1809-1827 doi: 10.1021/cr900107r
-
[9]
Ge J Y, Chen Z Y, Zhang L, Liang X, Su J, Mohamedally K, Zuo J L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. , 2019, 58(26): 8789-8793 doi: 10.1002/anie.201903281
-
[10]
Zhou J, Yang J, Qi L, Shen X, Zhu D R, Xu Y, Song Y. Transition Met. Chem. , 2007, 32(6): 711-715 doi: 10.1007/s11243-007-0234-2
-
[11]
齐丽, 朱敦如, 解大景, 吴艳飞, 沈旋. 无机化学学报, 2008, 24(6): 868-872 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4861.2008.06.005QI L, ZHU D R, XIE D J, WU Y F, SHEN X. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem. , 2008, 24(6): 868-872 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4861.2008.06.005
-
[12]
Yang J, Bao W W, Ren X M, Xu Y, Shen X, Zhu D R. J. Coord. Chem. , 2009, 62(11): 1809-1816 doi: 10.1080/00958970802709333
-
[13]
Cheng H M, Zhu D R, Lu W, Xu R H, Shen X. J. Heterocycl. Chem. , 2010, 47(1): 210-213
-
[14]
Lu W, Zhu D R, Xu Y, Chen H M, Zhao J, Shen X. Struct. Chem. , 2010, 21(1): 237-244 doi: 10.1007/s11224-009-9569-y
-
[15]
赵建, 卢伟, 陈浪, 沈旋, 许岩, 朱敦如. 无机化学学报, 2011, 27(4): 160-163 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYJ2014S1010.htmZHAO J, LU W, CHEN L, SHEN X, XU Y, ZHU D R. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem. , 2011, 27(4): 160-163 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYJ2014S1010.htm
-
[16]
陈浪, 程慧敏, 江静静, 沈旋, 朱敦如. 无机化学学报, 2012, 28(2): 381-385 https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10542-1014243224.htmCHEN L, CHENG H M, JIANG J J, SHEN X, ZHU D R. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem. , 2012, 28(2): 381-385 https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10542-1014243224.htm
-
[17]
沈国平, 赵建, 陈浪, 孙峰, 沈旋, 朱敦如, 刘晓勤. 无机化学学报, 2012, 28(1): 159-163 https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10542-1014243224.htmSHEN G P, ZHAO J, CHEN L, SUN F, SHEN X, ZHU D R, LIU X Q. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem. , 2012, 28(1): 159-163 https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10542-1014243224.htm
-
[18]
Shen G P, Qi L, Wang L, Xu Y, Jiang J J, Zhu D R, Liu X Q, You X Z. Dalton Trans. , 2013, 42(28): 10144-10152 doi: 10.1039/c3dt50821h
-
[19]
Wang L, Jiang J J, Chen L, Shen X, Zhu D R. Inorg. Chem. Commun. , 2013, 28: 104-108 doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2012.11.022
-
[20]
He X, Cao D Y, Jiang J J, Shen X, Zhu D R. J. Coord. Chem. , 2014, 67(2): 227-235 doi: 10.1080/00958972.2013.877585
-
[21]
Li B, Zhou Y F, Zhang S P, Qin T, Shen X, Xu Y, Zhu D R. J. Coord. Chem. , 2016, 69(18): 2647-2655 doi: 10.1080/00958972.2016.1214724
-
[22]
Zhou Y F, Zhang S P, Feng Z, Shen X, Zhu D R. J. Heterocycl. Chem. , 2017, 54(5): 2773-2780 doi: 10.1002/jhet.2880
-
[23]
Zhang S P, Feng Z, Wu B, Jiang J J, Zhu D R, He B. J. Coord. Chem. , 2018, 71(1): 46-56 doi: 10.1080/00958972.2018.1425838
-
[24]
冯哲, 高健飞, 李刚, 朱敦如. 无机化学学报, 2020, 36(6): 11691175 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXB201502001.htmFENG Z, GAO J F, LI G, ZHU D R. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem. , 2020, 36(6): 1169-1175 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXB201502001.htm
-
[25]
Chen S S, Zhang S P, Li H Q, Shao S C. Chinese J. Struct. Chem. , 2010, 29(3): 341-346
-
[26]
陈水生, 乔瑞, 张淑萍, 时兆菊, 盛良全. 大学化学, 2014, 29(6): 5154 https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10110-1017167161.htmCHEN S S, QIAO R, ZHANG S P, SHI Z J, SHENG L Q. University Chemistry, 2014, 29(6): 51-54 https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10110-1017167161.htm
-
[27]
Sheldrick G M. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A, 2008, A64: 112-122
-
[28]
Wu Y F, Zhu D R, Song Y, Shen K, Shen Z, Shen X, Xu Y. Inorg. Chem. Commun. , 2009, 12(10): 959-963 doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2009.07.016
-
[29]
卢伟, 谢大景, 王作祥, 沈旋, 许岩, 朱敦如. 无机化学学报, 2010, 26(4): 717-720 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ201402004.htmLU W, XIE D J, WANG Z X, SHEN X, XU Y, ZHU D R. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem. , 2010, 26(4): 717-720 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHXJ201402004.htm
-
[30]
Shen G P, Zhao J, Jiang J J, Liu Q, Shen X, Xu Y, Zhu D R, Liu X Q. J. Mol. Struct. , 2011, 1002(1/2/3): 159-166
-
[31]
Chen L, Zhao J, Shen G P, Shen X, Xu Y, Zhu D R. J. Coord. Chem. , 2011, 64(22): 3980-3991 doi: 10.1080/00958972.2011.634909
-
[32]
Hu T P, Zhao Q N, Huo L Q, Gao L L, Zhang J, Wang X Q, Fan L M. CrystEngComm, 2018, 20(30): 4291-4296 doi: 10.1039/C8CE00661J
-
[33]
Zhu D, Song Y, Liu Y, Xu Y, Zhang Y, You X, Raj S S S, Fun H K. Transition Met. Chem. , 2000, 25(5): 589-593 doi: 10.1023/A:1007037326099
-
[34]
Zhao J, Cheng H M, Shen G P, Xu Y, Zhu D R. J. Coord. Chem. , 2011, 64(6): 942-951 doi: 10.1080/00958972.2011.558897
-
[1]
-
Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinements for 1 and 2
Complex 1 2 Empirical formula C36H32Cl2CuN8O10S2 C38H28Cl4CuN10O8S2 Formula weight 935.25 1 022.16 Crystal system Monoclinic Monoclinic Space group P21/c P21/c a/nm 0.846 57(19) 0.830 66(11) b/nm 1.547 9(4) 1.541 0(2) c /nm 1.566 7(4) 3.404 6(5) β/(°) 98.002(3) 93.925(2) V /nm3 2.033 0(8) 4.347 8(10) Z 2 4 Dc/(g·cm-3) 1.528 1.562 μ/mm-1 0.838 0.908 F(000) 958 2 076 Crystal size/mm 0.17×0.13×0.09 0.15×0.12×0.09 θrange/ (°) 1.86~25.00 1.20~25.00 Reflection collected 14 399 30 959 Independent reflection 3 569 (Rint=0.033 3) 7 645 (Rint=0.033 9) Reflection observed [I > 2σ(I)] 2 877 6 127 Data, restraint, parameter 3 569, 67, 306 7 645, 30, 589 Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.066 1.071 R1, wR2[I > 2σ(I)] 0.039 3, 0.102 5 0.050 7, 0.135 8 R1, wR2(all data) 0.053 0, 0.108 8 0.064 9, 0.143 6 (Δρ)max, (Δρ)min/(e·nm-3) 409, -332 654, -471 Table 2. Selected bond distances (nm) and bond angles (°) for 1 and 2
1 Cu1-N1 0.205 6(2) Cu1-N2 0.198 4(2) Cu1-O1 0.240 6(2) N2-N3 0.138 2(3) S1-C8 0.171 7(3) S1-C11 0.170 0(4) N1-Cu1-N2 79.42(9) N1-Cu1-O1 84.20(9) N2-Cu1-O1 92.75(9) C1-N1-Cu1 126.4(18) C5-N1-Cu1 115.5(17) C6-N2-Cu1 115.3(3) 2 Cu1-N1 0.205 3(3) Cu1-N2 0.197 4(3) Cu1-O1 0.252 9(3) Cu1-N5 0.205 3(3) Cu1-N6 0.196 7(5) Cu1-O5 0.242 8(3) N2-N3 0.137 2(4) S1-C8 0.170 6(4) C15-Cl1 0.173 4(4) N6-N7 0.137 3(2) S2-C25 0.171 2(4) C32-Cl2 0.174 0(4) N1-Cu1-N2 80.46(11) N1-Cu1-O1 86.45(13) N2-Cu1-O1 89.08(12) N5-Cu1-N6 80.09(8) N5-Cu1-O5 91.69(7) N6-Cu1-O5 90.74(11) C1-N1-Cu1 127.4(2) C5-N1-Cu1 114.0(2) C6-N2-Cu1 113.8(2) C18-N5-Cu1 127.12(5) C22-N5-Cu1 114.49(8) C23-N6-Cu1 115.0(5) Table 3. Hydrogen-bond geometry and C—H…π interactions in 1 and 2
D-H…A d(D-H)/nm d(H…A)/nm d(D…A)/nm ∠D-H…A/(°) 1 O1-H1A…O4 0.086 0.203 0.279 6(6) 148 C1-H1…N3i 0.093 0.236 0.316 1(4) 144 C3-H3…O5ii 0.093 0.261 0.335 9(3) 138 C4-H4…π(Ph) 0.093 0.308 0.389 7(2) 148 C13-H13…O2iii 0.093 0.257 0.342 8(7) 154 C17-H17…O2i 0.093 0.260 0.349 2(8) 162 C18-H18C…π(Py) 0.096 0.326 0.402 9(8) 139 2 C1-H1…N7 0.093 0.233 0.310 2(5) 140 C2-H2…O2i 0.093 0.237 0.307 0(7) 131 C4-H4…π(Ph) 0.093 0.284 0.368 6(7) 152 C9-H9…O7ii 0.093 0.246 0.337 6(6) 168 C10-H10…N9iii 0.093 0.268 0.354 0(7) 154 C16-H16…O4iv 0.093 0.256 0.334 7(5) 142 C17-H17…O3iv 0.093 0.251 0.310 0(9) 122 C18-H18…N3 0.093 0.239 0.318 6(5) 143 C19-H19…O7ii 0.093 0.263 0.331 4(5) 130 C20-H20…O6v 0.093 0.258 0.350 8(7) 173 C21-H21…π(Ph) 0.093 0.302 0.384 6(6) 150 C26-H26…O1i 0.093 0.270 0.331 4(8) 123 C27-H27…N10vi 0.093 0.259 0.350 5(6) 168 Symmetry codes: i 1-x, 1-y, 1-z; ii 2-x, 1-y, 1-z; iii x, 1/2-y, 1/2+z for 1; i x-1, y, z; ii 1+x, y, z; iii 2-x, 1-y, 1-z; iv 1-x, y-1/2, 1.5-z; v 1-x, 1-y, 1-z; vi -x, 1-y, 1-z for 2. -

计量
- PDF下载量: 4
- 文章访问数: 855
- HTML全文浏览量: 108