A Chiral Ag(Ⅰ) Coordination Polymer Based on an α, α-L-Diaryl Prolinol-Pyridine Derivative: Circular Dichroism, SHG Response and Luminescent Property

Lin CHENG Jing-Hua YANG Qing-Chao ZHAI Qing-Song ZHANG

Citation:  CHENG Lin, YANG Jing-Hua, ZHAI Qing-Chao, ZHANG Qing-Song. A Chiral Ag(Ⅰ) Coordination Polymer Based on an α, α-L-Diaryl Prolinol-Pyridine Derivative: Circular Dichroism, SHG Response and Luminescent Property[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2020, 36(2): 361-367. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2020.013 shu

基于αα-L-二芳基脯氨醇-吡啶衍生物的手性Ag(Ⅰ)配位聚合物:圆二色谱、二次谐波响应和发光性质

    通讯作者: 程林, lcheng@seu.edu.cn
  • 基金项目:

    江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目和中央高校基本科研业务费 2242019k1G021

    江苏省自然科学基金 BK20131289

    江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目和中央高校基本科研业务费 2242019K40153

    国家自然科学基金(No.21471031), 江苏省自然科学基金(No.BK20131289), 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目和中央高校基本科研业务费(No.2242019k1G021, 2242019K40153)资助

    国家自然科学基金 21471031

摘要: 首次合成了αα-L-二芳基脯氨醇-吡啶衍生物:S-二(4-(吡啶-4-基)苯基)(吡咯烷-2-基)甲醇(L),并用其与硝酸银自组装出具有梯形链结构的一维手性Ag(Ⅰ)配位聚合物{[Ag4(L)4](NO34·1.5CH3OH·1.25H2O}n1);用IR、XRD、TG、粉末XRD和单晶XRD对聚合物结构进行了表征。圆二色谱和二次谐波响应测试也证明了它具有结构上的手性。此外,还研究了其荧光性质。

English

  • Chiral coordination polymers (CCPs), as a kind of functional crystal materials, have attracted comp-rehensive efforts to design and explore, because of their interesting topologies and structures[1-5] and their widely potential applications in heterogeneous cataly-sis[6-7], luminescence[8-9], gas storage[10-11], biomolecular loading[12-13], and so on. The potential properties and practical applications of such polymers are mainly dependent on the assembly of metal ions/clusters and organic linkers with accessible functional groups[14-15].

    Proline is an important small chiral amino acid and one of the most well-known privileged chiral organic catalysts. Due to its unique properties, such as conformational rigidity, inexpensive, nontoxic and environmentally friendly, proline and its various derivatives have been used as the catalysts for asymmetric catalytic reactions[16-17]. The incorporation of chiral proline and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been deeply investigated to constructed hetero-geneous catalysts via direct grafting to the linker[18-19], post-synthetic modification of the achiral linker backbone[20-21], or coordination to the open metal sites of the cluster[22-23]. α, α-L-diaryl prolinols, as a famous branch of L-proline derivatives, have been applied in a wide range of asymmetric organocatalysis catalysis[24]. However, to our best knowledge, only one chiral coordination polymer/MOF, based on α, α-L-diaryl prolinols, has been reported, in which a chiral Cu-MOF was constructed by chiral proline carboxylic acid derivative and applied in enantioselective aldol addition[25]. Herein, we synthesized a new chiral α, α-L-diaryl prolinol-pyridine ligand and constructed a chiral coordination polymer with silver ions under mild condition. The polymer displayed a one-dimensional (1D) ladder-like chain structure, which has been characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction, powdered X-ray diffraction (PXRD), infrared (IR) spectra, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), circular dichroism (CD) spectra, second-harmonic generation (SHG) and luminescent spectra.

    All chemicals were purchased and used without further purification. The ligand (L) synthesis was described in the following experimental section.

    1H NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker 600 MHz ADVANCE spectrometer. Mass spectra were afforded on Agilent 1260-6224. IR spectra (KBr Pellets) were collected on a Nicolet FT-IR 200 spectrophotometer Infrared in the mid-IR region. Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were recorded with JASCO J-810 spectrophotometer at room temperature under air. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were collected on an Rigaku, D/max-2500 X-ray diffractometer operating at 36 kV and 30 mA using Mo radiation (λ=0.071 073 nm) within the 2θ range of 5°~50° and the scan rate was 5°·min-1. Thermog-ravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a Netzsch STA 449 F3 Jupiter in a temperature range of 30~900 ℃ in N2 and a heating rate of 10 ℃·min-1. Kurtz powder method was used to test the second-harmonic generation (SHG) efficiency of 1.

    1.2.1   Syntheses of (S)-1-ethyl 2-methyl pyrrolidine- 1, 2-dicarboxylate (a) and (S)-ethyl 2-(bis(4- bromophenyl)(hydroxy)methyl)pyrrolidine-1- carboxylate (b)

    Compounds a and b were prepared in the same manner as reported in the literature[26].

    The product b was a white solid (10.602 g, Yield: 25.25%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ℃, TMS): 7.43~7.41 (m, 4H), 7.27~7.22 (m, 4H), 4.82 (dd, J=9.0, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.13~4.10 (m, 2H), 3.44~3.43 (m, 1H), 2.96 (m, 1H), 2.11~2.03 (m, 1H), 2.08~1.81 (m, 1H), 1.52~1.50 (m, 1H), 1.24~1.21 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 3H), 0.91~0.87 (m, 1H). ESI MS (m/z): Calcd. for C20H21Br2NO3 [M-H]+: 481.979 3, Found: 481.979 3.

    1.2.2   Synthesis of (S)-ethyl 2-(hydroxybis(4-(pyridin- 4-yl)phenyl)methyl)pyrrolidine-1-carboxylate (c)

    Under N2 atmosphere, a mixture of b (10.612 g, 0.022 mol), pyridine-4-boronic acid (11.802 g, 0.066 mol), anhydrous K2CO3 (18.812 g, 0.11 mol), THF (100 mL) and H2O (100 mL) was stirred for 10 min. Before the addition of Pd(PPh3)4 catalyst, O2 was removed by a N2 purge by vacuuming, and then the reaction was heated to reflux for 4 hours, and was monitored by TLC. After the reaction was completed, it was concentrated, followed by stirring with 100 mL water, extracting three times with 100 mL ethyl acetate, drying over anhydrous magnesium sulfate overnight, filtering and purifying by column chromatography on silica gel. The organic phase was combined, then washed with saturated NaHCO3 solution and purified by column on silica gel to afford product c(5.612 g, Yield: 43.04%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ℃, TMS): 8.11~8.10 (d, 4H), 7.70~7.66 (d, 4H), 7.61~7.59 (m, 4H), 7.54~7.52 (m, 4H), 4.17~4.10 (m, 2H), 3.97~3.94 (m, 6H), 3.48~3.37 (m, 1H), 3.02 (m, 1H), 2.19~2.15 (m, 1H), 2.04 (m, 1H), 1.57~1.55 (m, 1H), 1.28~1.24 (d, 4H), 0.97~0.96 (m, 1H); ESI MS (m/z): Calcd. for C30H29N3O3 [M+1]+: 480.207 4, Found: 480.227 4.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Synthetic route of ligand L
    1.2.3   Synthesis of (S)-bis(4-(pyridin-4-yl)phenyl) (pyrrolidin-2-yl)methanol (L)

    A mixture of c (5.612 g, 0.012 mol), KOH (5.6 g, 0.1 mol) in methanol (50 mL) and H2O (3 mL) was stirred and heated at reflux overnight. After the reaction was finished, the mixture was cooled to room temperature. Then it was concentrated in vacuum to remove a portion of methanol, followed by stirring with 100 mL water, extracting three times with 100 mL ethyl acetate, drying over anhydrous magnesium sulfate overnight, evaporating to afford the product L (3.212 g, Yield: 65.56%). IR (KBr) cm-1: 3 285(s), 3 071(s), 3 031(m), 2 963(w), 2 863(m), 2 436(m), 1 933(m), 1 739(m), 1 645(s), 1 592(m), 1 532(m), 1 472(m), 1 398(m), 1 324(m), 1 284(m), 1 224(s), 1 170(m), 1 084(m), 1 024(m), 983(s), 909 (m), 849(m), 803(m), 736 (m), 629(m). 1H NMR (600 MHz, d6-DMSO, 25 ℃, TMS): 8.62~8.60 (d, 4H), 7.77~7.66 (m, 12H), 4.37 (s, 1H), 3.46~3.37 (m, 2H), 2.90~2.83 (d, 2H), 1.68~1.58 (m, 2H), 1.52~1.44 (m, 2H); ESI MS (m/z): Calcd. for C27H25N3O[M+1]+: 408.207 4, Found: 408.207 4.

    1.3.1   Synthesis of {[Ag4(L)4](NO3)4·1.5CH3OH· 1.25H2O}n (1)

    A mixture of L (40.7 mg, 0.1 mmol), AgNO3 (17.1 mg, 0.1 mmol), H2O (10 mL) and MeOH (10 mL) were stirred for half an hour at room temperature, then filtered. The filtrate was evaporated in the dark for 20 days. Colorless transparent block crystals of 1 were obtained and dried in air (18 mg, Yield: 30.3% based on AgNO3). Anal. Calcd. for C109.5H106.5Ag4N16O18.75(%): C 55.30, H 4.51, N 9.42; Found(%): C 54.63, H 4.80, N 9.37. IR (KBr) cm-1: 3 406(s), 3 225(s), 2 957(m), 2 877(w), 1 920(m), 1 606(m), 1 545(s), 1 485(m), 1 378(m), 1 327(m), 1 224(m), 1 097(m), 1 070(m), 996(s), 809(m), 756(m).

    A suitable single crystal of 1 with approximate dimensions was mounted on a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer. The diffraction data were collected using a graphite monochromated Ga radiation (λ=0.134 138 nm) at 193(2) K. Absorption corrections were applied using SADABS[27]. The structure was solved by using the SHELXS-2018/3 program package[28]. All non-hydrogen atoms were isotropically refined initially and subsequently treated anisotropically (with the exception of the disordered atoms). The organic hydrogen atoms were generated geometrically. The assignment of the absolute structures for 1 was confirmed by the refinement of the Flack enantiopole parameter to values of 0.068(16)[29]. One nitrate in 1 was badly disordered. N-O bond lengths and O-N-O bond angles of the disordered nitrate were restrained to chemically reasonable values using the DFIX commands in SHELXS-2018/3[28]. Crystal data as well as details of the data collection and refinements for the complexes were summarized in Table 1. Selected bond distances and bond angles were listed in Table 2.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Crystal data and structure refinement parameters of 1
    下载: 导出CSV
    FormulaC438H426Ag16N64O75 F(000) 4 854
    Formula weight 9 512.32 Reflection 57 913
    Crystal system Monoclinic Unique 17 283
    Space group C2 Observed data [I>2σ(I)] 11 746
    a / nm 3.234 4(1) Rint 0.078
    b / nm 2.349 7(1) μ / mm-1 4.526
    c / nm 1.445 9(1) Flack x 0.068(16)
    β / (°) 111.016(2) R1a [I>2σ(I)] 0.073
    V / nm3 10.257 3(5) wR2b (all data) 0.207 4
    Z 1 GOF 0.99
    Dc / (g·cm-3) 1.54 Largest diff. peak and hole / (e·nm-3) 1 020, -760
    $^{\mathrm{a}} R_{1}=\sum\left\|F_{\mathrm{o}}|-| F_{\mathrm{c}}\right\| / \sum\left|F_{\mathrm{o}}\right|, \quad w R_{2}=\left[\sum w\left(F_{\mathrm{o}}^{2}-F_{\mathrm{c}}^{2}\right)^{2} / \sum w\left(F_{\mathrm{o}}^{2}\right)^{2}\right]^{1 / 2} $

    Table 2

    Table 2.  Selected bond distances (nm) and bond angles (°) of 1
    下载: 导出CSV
    Ag1-N5i 0.221 5(11) Ag1-N1 0.225 3(12) Ag1-N4 0.243 1(13)
    Ag2-N8 0.222 4(11) Ag2-N12 0.219 0(14) Ag2-N9ii 0.259 9(11)
    Ag3-N7ii 0.220 7(17) Ag3-N10 0.253 8(13) Ag3-N11ii 0.222 1(13)
    Ag4-N2 0.219 7(11) Ag4-N3i 0.267 7(15) Ag4-N6i 0.222 3(13)
    N5i-Ag1-N1 150.4(4) N1-Ag1-N4 84.7(5) N5i-Ag1-N4 115.7(4)
    N12-Ag2-N9ii 94.8(4) N12-Ag2-N8 159.8(4) N8-Ag2-N9ii 103.6(4)
    N7ii-Ag3-N11ii 157.4(5) N11ii-Ag3-N10 107.9(4) N7ii-Ag3-N10 88.6(5)
    N6i-Ag4-N3i 77.98(16) N6i-Ag4-N2 162.1(4) N2-Ag4-N3i113.75(17)
    Symmetry codes: i x, y, -1+z; ii x, y, 1+z

    CCDC: 1938582, 1.

    Single-crystal XRD study reveals that 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic system with chiral space group C2, consisting of four Ag(Ⅰ) ions, four chiral L ligands, four nitrates, one and a half free methanol molecules, one and a quarter lattice water molecules in an asymmetric unit. Four crystallographically independent Ag(Ⅰ) ions contain the same coordination mode with similar bond lengths and bond angles, and display an approximately trigonal planar geometry, surrounded by two nitrogen atoms of two pyridine ring and one nitrogen atom of pyrrolidine ring, respectively, from three adjacent organic ligands (Fig. 1a). Meanwhile, each chiral organic ligand in 1 acts in a tetradentate mode (Fig. 1b) and bridges four adjacent Ag(Ⅰ) ions to build a 1D ladder-like chain structure (Fig. 2).

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Coordination environment of Ag(Ⅰ) (a) and coordination mode of L (b)

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  One dimensional ladder-like chain structure in 1

    The IR bands, being most useful for defining the coordination mode of L and 1, were ν(C=N)pyridine and ν(C-N)pyrrole vibrations[30]. As shown in Fig. 3, such two bands of the ligand L were at 1 645 and 1 284 cm-1; however, they shifted to 1 606 and 1 224 cm-1, respectively, in 1, which indicates that the N atoms on the pyridine and pyrrole participated in the coor-dination. In addition, the infrared spectrum of complex 1 had absorption peaks at 1 485, 1 378, and 1 327 cm-1, indicating the presence of nitrate[31-32], which is consistent with the resolved crystal structure.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Infrared spectra of 1 and L

    The simulated and experimental PXRD patterns of coordination polymer 1 were given in Fig. 4. The results show that the crystal structures are truly representative of the bulk materials[33]. The differences in intensity are due to the preferred orientation of the powder samples[33].

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  PXRD patterns of polymer 1: (a) simulated from X- ray single crystal data; (b) as newly synthesized

    To confirm the stability and structural integrity of 1 at elevated temperatures, the powdered sample was examined by TGA[34]. The test conditions ranged from 30 to 900 ℃ in a N2 atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 ℃·min-1. The sample was first dried in vacuum to remove any residual solvent. From the thermogravi-metric curve shown in Fig. 5, there were two obvious and separate thermal weight-loss processes due to the presence of lattice water and methanol molecules. The first weight loss stage began at 30 ℃ and ended at 108 ℃, which is due to the release of all the water and methanol molecules (Obsd. 3.2%, Calcd. 3.0%). The second stage corresponding to the removal of the ligands was observed between 108 and 400 ℃, indicating the decomposition of the whole structure.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  TG analysis of 1

    CD spectrum has been proved to be a useful tool to analyze the enantiomeric optical activity of the bulk crystals[35-39]. Powdered bulk samples of the ligand L and polymer 1 were used to confirm their chiral nature in a KBr matrix between 180 and 400 nm at room temperature, as shown in Fig. 6. The ligand L and 1 presented similar dichroic signals in CD spectrum, with two positive Cotton effects at 267 and 282 nm, as well as 274 and 310 nm frequencies, and two negative Cotton effects at 261 and 274 nm, as well as 270 and 297 nm frequencies, respectively, which confirms the chirality of the bulk samples.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  CD spectra of complex 1 and L in the solid state at room temperature

    Second harmonic generation (SHG) was an effective method to analyze the asymmetry of the crystals. Polymer 1 is worthwhile to test the NLO properties because it is a chiral coordination polymer with chiral C2 space group[35-40]. The preliminary test results of the powdered sample suggest that 1 has SHG efficiency, approximately 1.2 times as big as that of KDP, which indicated that it can be applied to second-order nonlinear materials.

    It is well-known that d10 complexes always exhibited excellent luminescent properties[41]. As illustrated in Fig. 7, the luminescent properties of the ligand L and 1 in a methanol solution were investigated at room temperature. The ligand L exhibited an intense UV radiation with λmax at 366 nm upon excitation at 300 nm, which may be attributed to the π-π* transition. The emission spectra of 1 showed a purple luminescence emission at 384 nm upon excitation at 300 nm. Compared to the ligand, a red shift of 18 nm occurred, which may be assigned to charge transfer between the ligand and the metal ions in 1[32].

    Figure 7

    Figure 7.  Luminescent spectra of complex 1 and ligand L in a methanol solution

    In summary, chiral L-proline was used as a starting material to synthesize a new pyridine-functionalized α, α-L-diaryl prolinol ligand. The structure of the ligand was characterized by NMR, MS and IR, and successfully applied to construct a chiral Ag(Ⅰ) coordination polymer with 1D ladder-like chain structure. CD spectrum and SHG response indicate that the bulk sample of 1 is chiral. Moreover, the luminescent properties of the ligand and polymer were also studied.

    Supporting information is available at http://www.wjhxxb.cn


    1. [1]

      Lu W. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43:5561-5593 doi: 10.1039/C4CS00003J

    2. [2]

      Kirchon A, Feng L, Drake H F, et al. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47:8611-8638 doi: 10.1039/C8CS00688A

    3. [3]

      Cheng L, Zhang L M, Cao Q N, et al. CrystEngComm, 2012, 14:7502-7510 doi: 10.1039/c2ce26198g

    4. [4]

      Cheng L, Zhang L M, Gou S H, et al. CrystEngComm, 2012, 14:4437-4443 doi: 10.1039/c2ce25317h

    5. [5]

      程林, 刘琪, 杨晶华, 等.无机化学学报, 2018, 34(6):1018-1027CHENG Lin, LIU Qi, YANG Jing-Hua, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2018, 34(6):1018-1027 

    6. [6]

      Aguirredíaz L M, Gándara F, Iglesias M, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137:6132-6135 doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b02313

    7. [7]

      Yoon T P, Jacobsen E N. Science, 2003, 299:1691-1693 doi: 10.1126/science.1083622

    8. [8]

      Singha D K, Majee P, Mondal S K, et al. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 2018, 356:389-396 doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.01.024

    9. [9]

      Rao P C, Chaudhary S P, Kuznetsov D, et al. Inorg. Chem., 2016, 55:12669-12674 doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b01836

    10. [10]

      Murray L J, Dinc M, Long J R. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38:1294-1314 doi: 10.1039/b802256a

    11. [11]

      Chen Z G, Zou J, Liu G, et al. ACS Nano, 2008, 2:2183-2191 doi: 10.1021/nn8004922

    12. [12]

      Lian X Z, Huang Y Y, Zhu Y Y, et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57:5725-5730 doi: 10.1002/anie.201801378

    13. [13]

      Majewski M B, Howarth A J, Li P, et al. CrystEngComm, 2017, 19:4082-4091 doi: 10.1039/C7CE00022G

    14. [14]

      Bai N N, Gao R C, Wang H H, et al. CrystEngComm, 2018, 20:5726-5734 doi: 10.1039/C8CE01003J

    15. [15]

      Tan Y X, Yang X, Li B B, et al. Chem. Commun., 2016, 52:13671-13674 doi: 10.1039/C6CC08191F

    16. [16]

      Greco R, Caciolli L, Zaghi A, et al. React. Chem. Eng., 2016, 1:183-193 doi: 10.1039/C5RE00017C

    17. [17]

      Yao W, Shen H, Le Z, et al. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6:6739-6749 doi: 10.1039/C6CY00448B

    18. [18]

      Kutzscher C, Senkovska, I, Bon V, et al. Chem. Mater., 2016, 28:2573-2580 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04575

    19. [19]

      Liu L J, Zhou T Y, Telfer S G. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139:13936-13943 doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b07921

    20. [20]

      Nickerl C G, Senkovska I, Bon V, et al. Chem. Mater., 2016, 28:2573-2580 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04575

    21. [21]

      Fracaroli A M, Siman P, Nagib D A, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138:8352-8355 doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04204

    22. [22]

      王萍萍, 陈丹平, 王淑华, 等.无机化学学报, 2017, 33(5):817-822WANG Ping-Ping, CHEN Dan-Ping, WANG Shu-Hua, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2017, 33(5):817-822 

    23. [23]

      Han Q X, Li W W, Wang S G, et al. ChemCatChem, 2017, 9:1801-1807 doi: 10.1002/cctc.201700160

    24. [24]

      Meninno S, Lattanzi A. Chem. Commun., 2013, 49:3821-3832 doi: 10.1039/c3cc36928e

    25. [25]

      Sartor M, Stein T, Hoffmann F, et al. Chem. Mater., 2016, 28:519-528 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03723

    26. [26]

      Kanth J V B, Periasamy M. Tetrahedron, 1993, 49:5127-5132 doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)81877-9

    27. [27]

      Sheldrick G M. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A:Found. Crystallogr., 2015, A71:3-8

    28. [28]

      SHELXL-2018/3, Bruker Analytical Instrumentation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2018.

    29. [29]

      Flack H D. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A:Found. Crystallogr., 1983, A39:876-881

    30. [30]

      毛献杰, 周利华, 伏思连, 等.无机化学学报, 2017, 33(1):163-168MAO Xian-Jie, ZHOU Li-Hua, FU Si-Lian, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2017, 33(1):163-168 

    31. [31]

      Cheng L, Zhang L M, Gou S H, et al. CrystEngComm, 2012, 14:3888-3893 doi: 10.1039/c2ce25043h

    32. [32]

      Cheng L, Wang J, Yu H Y, et al. J. Solid State Chem., 2015, 221:85-94 doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2014.09.020

    33. [33]

      严世承, 武大令, 张敏芝, 等.无机化学学报, 2018, 34(6):1110-1120YAN Shi-Cheng, WU Da-Lin, ZHANG Min-Zhi, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2018, 34(6):1110-1120 

    34. [34]

      刘强, 张帅, 杜凯, 等.无机化学学报, 2018, 34(6):1143-1148LIU Qiang, ZHANG Shuai, DU Kai, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2018, 34(6):1143-1148

    35. [35]

      Cheng L, Wang J, Zhang X Y, et al. Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2014, 47:144-147 doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2014.07.032

    36. [36]

      Zhang X Y, Cheng L, Wang J, et al. Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2014, 40:97-102 doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2013.11.044

    37. [37]

      Cheng L, Wang J, Qi Q, et al. CrystEngComm, 2014, 16:10056-10065 doi: 10.1039/C4CE01601G

    38. [38]

      Cheng L, Cao Q N, Zhang L M, et al. Solid State Sci., 2013, 16:34-38 doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2012.10.016

    39. [39]

      Cheng L, Cao Q N, Zhang X Y, et al. Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2012, 24:110-113 doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2012.08.018

    40. [40]

      马德运, 李湘, 郭海福, 等.无机化学学报, 2017, 33(7):1266-1272MA De-Yun, LI Xiang, GUO Hai-Fu, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2017, 33(7):1266-1272 

    41. [41]

      Wang J, Qi Q, Cheng L, et al. Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2015, 58:5-8 doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2015.05.013

  • Scheme 1  Synthetic route of ligand L

    Figure 1  Coordination environment of Ag(Ⅰ) (a) and coordination mode of L (b)

    Figure 2  One dimensional ladder-like chain structure in 1

    Figure 3  Infrared spectra of 1 and L

    Figure 4  PXRD patterns of polymer 1: (a) simulated from X- ray single crystal data; (b) as newly synthesized

    Figure 5  TG analysis of 1

    Figure 6  CD spectra of complex 1 and L in the solid state at room temperature

    Figure 7  Luminescent spectra of complex 1 and ligand L in a methanol solution

    Table 1.  Crystal data and structure refinement parameters of 1

    FormulaC438H426Ag16N64O75 F(000) 4 854
    Formula weight 9 512.32 Reflection 57 913
    Crystal system Monoclinic Unique 17 283
    Space group C2 Observed data [I>2σ(I)] 11 746
    a / nm 3.234 4(1) Rint 0.078
    b / nm 2.349 7(1) μ / mm-1 4.526
    c / nm 1.445 9(1) Flack x 0.068(16)
    β / (°) 111.016(2) R1a [I>2σ(I)] 0.073
    V / nm3 10.257 3(5) wR2b (all data) 0.207 4
    Z 1 GOF 0.99
    Dc / (g·cm-3) 1.54 Largest diff. peak and hole / (e·nm-3) 1 020, -760
    $^{\mathrm{a}} R_{1}=\sum\left\|F_{\mathrm{o}}|-| F_{\mathrm{c}}\right\| / \sum\left|F_{\mathrm{o}}\right|, \quad w R_{2}=\left[\sum w\left(F_{\mathrm{o}}^{2}-F_{\mathrm{c}}^{2}\right)^{2} / \sum w\left(F_{\mathrm{o}}^{2}\right)^{2}\right]^{1 / 2} $
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 2.  Selected bond distances (nm) and bond angles (°) of 1

    Ag1-N5i 0.221 5(11) Ag1-N1 0.225 3(12) Ag1-N4 0.243 1(13)
    Ag2-N8 0.222 4(11) Ag2-N12 0.219 0(14) Ag2-N9ii 0.259 9(11)
    Ag3-N7ii 0.220 7(17) Ag3-N10 0.253 8(13) Ag3-N11ii 0.222 1(13)
    Ag4-N2 0.219 7(11) Ag4-N3i 0.267 7(15) Ag4-N6i 0.222 3(13)
    N5i-Ag1-N1 150.4(4) N1-Ag1-N4 84.7(5) N5i-Ag1-N4 115.7(4)
    N12-Ag2-N9ii 94.8(4) N12-Ag2-N8 159.8(4) N8-Ag2-N9ii 103.6(4)
    N7ii-Ag3-N11ii 157.4(5) N11ii-Ag3-N10 107.9(4) N7ii-Ag3-N10 88.6(5)
    N6i-Ag4-N3i 77.98(16) N6i-Ag4-N2 162.1(4) N2-Ag4-N3i113.75(17)
    Symmetry codes: i x, y, -1+z; ii x, y, 1+z
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 文章访问数:  30
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2020-02-10
  • 收稿日期:  2019-07-11
  • 修回日期:  2019-10-03
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章