English

• 0.   Introduction

  Since polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) materials were first pioneered by Scott in 1946, the application of POSS in academic and industrial fields has attracted widespread interest because of their well-defined nanostructure^[1-5]. Generally, POSS owns a unique cubic cage-shaped nanostructure with the general formula (R-SiO_1.5)₈^[6-7], which contains a polyhedron silicon-oxygen cube skeleton with inter-mittent siloxane linkages and tunable organic groups at the silicon atoms^[8-9], where the R unit is functional organic or aliphatic groups, such as alkyl, aryl or any of their derivatives^[10-11]. The average POSS core diameter falls in the range of approximately 0.45~0.53 nm^[12]. POSS have distinct chemical properties, such as facile chemical modification^[13], good solubility^[14], high temperature and oxidation resistance properties^[15-17]. When POSS moieties are incorporated into the compounds, the generated nanocomposites can result in novel interesting physical properties such as increases in glass transition temperature^[18-19], thermal stability^[20-21], mechanical strength^[22-23], and oxidation resistance.

  Recently, POSS-based luminescent materials have attracted a great deal of attention due to their good solubility in organic solvents^[24-25]. Incorporation of POSS moieties into luminescent materials should not only enhance the fluorescence quantum yields of the aggregate state, but also improve the mechanical properties^[26-27]. For example, Zhao used 7-allyl-8-hydroxyquinoline (Hq-allyl) as the ancillary ligand to synthesize a new iridium(Ⅲ) coumarin complex, Ir(L)₂(q-allyl), and carbazole moieties covalently attached to the POSS, gained good thermal stability and photo-luminescence performance^[28]. At present, most of the POSS-based luminescent materials were chromophores or other groups. In addition, a small amount of POSS-containing luminescent materials were lack of common fluorescent units. For instance, Mohamed synthesized the unusual fluorescent POSS-containing polymers lacking any common fluorescent units: a poly (maleimide isobutyl POSS) homopolymer and poly(styrene-alt-maleimide isobutyl POSS) and poly(4-acetoxystyrene-alt-maleimide isobutyl POSS) alterna-ting copolymers^[29-30]. However, much less attention has been paid to the luminescence of POSS itself, because there is no conjugated group in their molecule structures.

  In this study, we found a unique luminescence phenomenon in the POSS system, that the POSS compounds without any chromophore showed obvious luminescence after heat treatment in their THF solutions. To verify this luminescence behavior, two different POSS monomers, i.e., the AIPOSS with amino groups and the OIPOSS with all inert groups were investigated. In both of the cases the unique luminescence phenomena were found. For further study of the luminescence mechanism, the chemical structures of the POSS compounds were characterized by means of ¹H, ²⁹Si NMR spectroscopy, and FTIR spectroscopy. The results showed that the POSS compounds contained nearly intact in structures. The valence state of silicon was also determined by means of XPS, which verified that the Si atom remained the valence state before/after the treatment. We considered several possible origination of the luminescence of the POSS, and deduced that this unusual luminescence is most likely caused by the adsorption effect of the solvent in the POSS cages.

  1.   Experiments

  1.1   Materials

  Aminopropyl isobutyl POSS and octal isobutyl POSS were purchased from Hybrid Plastics Company, USA. THF was purchased from Alfa-Aesar. All chem-ical reagents were used as received without further purification.

  1.2   Characterization

  ¹H, ²⁹Si NMR spectra were obtained on an Avance Ⅲ 400 MHz. FTIR spectra were obtained on a Nicolet-6700 spectrometer. The XPS was conducted with PHI 5000 Versa Probe (ULVAC-PHI, Japan). Fluorescence spectra were collected at room temperature on a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer.

  1.3   Preparation of F-AIPOSS

  Aminopropyl isobutyl POSS (0.3 g) was dissolved in THF (20 mL), and then heated under reflux at 66 ℃ for 10 h in the nitrogen atmosphere. The solution changes from colorless and transparent into yellow. Then, the solvent was distilled off under reduced pressure, yielding a deep orange oil-like liquid. The resulted sample was denoted as F-AIPOSS. For further FTIR, NMR and XPS characterization, the resulted sample was dried in the vacuum overnight.

  1.4   Preparation of F-OIPOSS

  The same procedures as above were carried out, yielding a deep orange oil-like liquid. The resulted sample was denoted as F-OIPOSS. For further FTIR, NMR and XPS characterization, the resulted sample was dried in the vacuum overnight.

  2.   Results and discussion

  The chemical structures of AIPOSS and OIPOSS are depicted in Scheme 1. Generally, both AIPOSS and OIPOSS are regarded as non-luminous materials, because there is no conjugated group in their molecule structures. Interestingly, we found that the treated AIPOSS (denoted as F-AIPOSS) showed bright blue fluorescence after stirred and refluxed in THF solution. To study the unusual luminescence pheno-menon, another POSS compound OIPOSS with only inert groups was investigated also. The treated OIPOSS (denoted as F-OIPOSS) showed bright blue emission also. Fig. 1 shows the photographs of the F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS and their untreated counterparts under 365 nm UV illumination. It could be observed that both the F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS showed a strong blue fluorescence.

  Scheme 1

  

  Scheme 1.  Chemical structures of: (a) aminopropyl isobutyl POSS (AIPOSS); (b) octal isobutyl POSS (OIPOSS)

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  A1: F-AIPOSS/THF solution; A2: AIPOSS/THF solution; B3: F-OIPOSS/THF solution; B4: OIPOSS/THF solution; C1 and C3: Photographs of F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS in the solid state under 365 nm UV illumination, respectively; D: Photographs of A1, A2, B3, and B4 under 365 nm UV illumination, respectively

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  The luminescence properties of the POSS samples in THF solution and in solid state were investigated. Fig. 2 presents the PL spectra of F-AIPOSS, AIPOSS, F-OIPOSS, and OIPOSS in THF solution (1 mmol·L^-1). And Fig. 3 exhibited the PL spectra of F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS in solid state.

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  PL spectra of F-AIPOSS, AIPOSS, F-OIPOSS, and OIPOSS solutions in THF (1 mmol·L^-1) under different excitation wavelength

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  PL spectra of F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS under different excitation wavelength in the solid state

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  The F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS featured strong emission peaks at about 430 nm either in THF solutions or solid states. Contrastively, the AIPOSS and OIPOSS THF solutions showed similar luminescence as well, but their emission intensities were rather low, and no luminescence at all could be detected in their solid states. In addition, it was noted that the F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS solutions exhibited maximum emission intensity under excitation wavelength of 380 and 370 nm, respectively, which was a little red shift compared with that of the AIPOSS and OIPOSS solutions (360 nm) and the solid F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS samples (350 and 340 nm, respectively). The corresponding data were listed in Table 1.

  Table 1

  

  Table 1.  Excitation wavelength for maximum (λ_{Ex, max}) and minimum (λ_{Ex, min}) emission intensity of the POSS samples

  下载: 导出CSV

  	λEx, max / nm	λEx, min / nm
  F-AIPOSS/THF solution	380	360
  AIPOSS/THF solution	360	380
  F-OIPOSS/THF solution	370	360
  OIPOSS/THF solution	360	370
  F-AIPOSS in solid state	350	380
  F-OIPOSS in solid state	340	380

  It is interesting that the treatment heating in the THF solution could result in the luminescence of these POSS compounds. As depicted in Scheme 1, there is no chromophore in these POSS compounds, and the used solvent has no luminescence also in the visible region. Naturally, it was speculated that the structures of the AIPOSS and OIPOSS changed after heating in the THF solution. So their structures were characterized by means of ¹H NMR, ²⁹Si NMR and FTIR, respectively. For the characterization, all the samples were dried in vacuum to insure the purity.

  ¹H NMR spectrum of F-AIPOSS sample in CDCl₃ (Fig.S1 in Supporting Information) features a signal at 2.68, 1.85, 1.54, 0.93 for the SiCH₂CH₂CH₂NH₂ methylene, SiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ methine, SiCH₂CH₂CH₂NH₂ methylene and SiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ methyl groups, respe-ctively; and a signal at 0.61 for both the SiCH₂CH₂CH₂NH₂ and SiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ methylene groups. For the AIPOSS (Fig.S2 in Supporting Infor-mation), there are signals at 2.72, 1.86, 1.60, 0.96 for the SiCH₂CH₂CH₂NH₂ methylene, SiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ methine, SiCH₂CH₂CH₂NH₂ methylene and SiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ methyl groups, respectively; and a signal at 0.66 for both the SiCH₂CH₂CH₂NH₂ and SiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ methylene groups.

  ¹H NMR spectrum of the F-OIPOSS (Fig.S3 in Supporting Information) features signals at 1.86, 0.96, 0.60 for the SiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ methine, SiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ methyl and SiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ methylene groups, respe-ctively. For the OIPOSS (Fig.S4 in Supporting Infor-mation), signals arise at 1.86, 0.95, 0.60 for the SiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ methine, SiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ methyl and SiCH₂CH(CH₃)2 methylene groups, respectively.

  According to the ¹H NMR results, there is little difference in the POSS samples before/after heating in THF solution, indicating that they keep nearly unchanged chemical structures before/after the treat-ment. But very tiny difference could be found after amplifying the ¹H NMR spectra of the F-AIPOSS/AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS/OIPOSS, that two signals in the treated POSS (F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS) arise at about 1.43 and 1.26, respectively, which might be due to the signals from the residual THF (Fig.S5 in Supporting Information). And if the oil-like F-AIPOSS or F-OIPOSS samples rather than the dried ones were used in the ¹HNMR characterization, the THF related signals increased obviously.

  To make sure the structures of the POSS samples further, their ²⁹Si NMR spectra were investigated. For the ²⁹Si NMR spectra of F-AIPOSS (Fig. 4), two peaks appear, centering at -67.54 (peak a) and -67.82 (peak b), corresponding to their -OSiCH₂CH₂CH₂NH₂ and -OSiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ units, respectively. For that of AIPOSS, two peaks appear at -67.81 (peak a₁) and -67.99 (peak b₁), corresponding to their OSiCH₂CH₂ CH₂NH₂ and OSiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ units, respe-ctively. For the F-OIPOSS/OIPOSS cases (Fig. 5), only one peak appears at -67.84 (peak c) or -67.92 (peak c₁) for F-OIPOSS and OIPOSS, respectively, attribu-ting to their OSiCH₂CH(CH₃)₂ units.

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  ²⁹Si NMR spectra of F-AIPOSS and AIPOSS in CDCl₃

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Figure 5

  

  Figure 5.  ²⁹Si NMR spectra of F-OIPOSS and OIPOSS in CDCl₃

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  These ²⁹Si NMR spectra results suggest that no cage cleavage occurred in the POSS samples after the heat treatment in THF, proving that the POSS cores of F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS remaining intact.

  Fig. 6 displays the FTIR spectra of F-AIPOSS, AIPOSS, F-OIPOSS and OIPOSS at room temperature. Characteristic absorption bands appear at 2 950~2 870 cm^-1 and 1 110 cm^-1, representing the isobutyl C-H stretching and the Si-O-Si stretching in the POSS structure, respectively. This result indicates that no obvious functional groups appear in the treated POSS samples.

  Figure 6

  

  Figure 6.  FTIR spectra of F-AIPOSS, AIPOSS, F-OIPOSS and OIPOSS

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  According the structure characterization results mentioned above, there is no obvious chemical structure change could be found in the treated POSS compounds. It is obscure what the origination of the luminescence is. Because excellent light-emitting Si nanocrystals could be synthesized from hydrogen silsesquioxane^[31], the formation of trace silicon nano-crystals is one of our speculations. But the XPS analysis result of F-AIPOSS did not support this point. As shown in Fig. 7, only one peak at 102.0 eV was detected from Si2p region of F-AIPOSS, which is consistent with O-Si-C species, and no signal of Si(0) at 98.9 eV had been detected. Therefore no Si nanocrystal formed in our experiments.

  Figure 7

  

  Figure 7.  High resolution XPS spectrum of Si2p region of the F-AIPOSS

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Another speculation is the formation of the POSS/solvent adduct. Considering the cage-shaped nanostructure of the POSS compounds, it is possible that the solvent molecules enter into the cages of the POSS, forming the POSS/solvent adducts, which modulate the electron structures of the POSS, and consequently leads to the luminescence. In our experiments, the resulted F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS are oil-like before dried under vacuum, indicating that there is much solvent in the samples. And these samples could not dried entirely from the solvent, tiny THF related ¹H NMR signals were still detected in the dried F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS samples as mentioned above. We suppose that the formation of the POSS/solvent adduct determines the emission properties of the corresponding samples. After heating in the THF solution, much solvent enters into the POSS cages, and many POSS/solvent adducts form consequently, giving rise to intensive luminescence from the F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS THF solutions (Fig. 2). When the F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS dried further, some of the solvent molecules escape from the cages, which destroys part of the POSS/solvent adducts, resulting in decreased emission intensity of the solid samples (Fig. 3). For the case of untreated AIPOSS and OIPOSS compounds, they have no emission at all in the solid states, because there is no POSS/solvent adduct in the sample. But very weak emission could be detected in their THF solution, it is attributed to a few solvent molecules enter into the POSS cages. Due to the rate of formation of the POSS/solvent adducts is very low at the room temperature, these solutions exhibit weak luminescence only (Fig. 2). It is supposed also that the more the POSS/solvent adducts form in the samples, the more the electronic delocalization is resulted to some extent. Therefore, the F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS THF solutions exhibited red shift in their λ_{Ex, max} compared with their solid counterparts and the AIPOSS and OIPOSS solutions (Table 1). Unfortuna-tely, we have no direct evidences for how the POSS/solvent adducts form. It is still need further investiga-tion for this luminescence behaviour.

  3.   Conclusions

  In summary, an unusual luminescence behavior from the POSS compounds was observed, that the non-luminous POSS compounds showed intensive lumines-cence after heating and stirring in THF solution. The chemical structures of the corresponding POSS samples were characterized by using ¹H NMR, ²⁹H NMR, XPS, and FTIR spectroscopy. No obvious structure changes could be detected after the POSS compounds heating in the solvent, except the tiny difference of the ¹H NMR spectra. It is supposed that this unusual luminescence is most likely ascribed to the formation of the POSS/solvent adducts in the system, which alters the electronic structures of the POSS compounds, and consequently leads to this unusual luminescence behavior.

  Supporting information is available at http://www.wjhxxb.cn

  
  Acknowledgements: The authors are grateful for financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.51502285), National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No.21521092), National Natural Science Foundation for Creative Research Group (Grant No.21701047), the Science and Technology Development of Jilin Province of China (Grant No.20180520191JH), and the Thirteenth Five-Year Program for Science and Technology of the Education Department of Jilin Province (Grant No.JJKH20191024KJ).
• 1. [1]

     Scott D W. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1946, 68(3):356-358 doi: 10.1021/ja01207a003

  2. [2]

     Tong Y D, Zhang Y H, Liu Y Y, et al. RSC Adv., 2018, 8(25):13813-13819 doi: 10.1039/C8RA01584H

  3. [3]

     Nasab N H, Jalili M M, Farrokhpay S, et al. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2018, 135(8):45913 doi: 10.1002/app.45913

  4. [4]

     Nguyen T A, Gregersen O W, Mannle F. Polymers, 2015, 7(8):1522-1540 doi: 10.3390/polym7081468

  5. [5]

     王超, 光善仪, 徐洪耀.功能材料, 2019, 50(7):07071-07018 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9731.2019.07.013WANG Chao, GUANG Shan-Yi, XU Hong-Yao. Func. Mater., 2019, 50(7):07071-07018 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9731.2019.07.013

  6. [6]

     Fu B X, Hsiao B S, Pagola S, et al. Polymer, 2001, 42(2):599-611 doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00389-X

  7. [7]

     Carroll J B, Frankamp B L, Rotello V M. Chem. Commun., 2002(17):1892-1893 doi: 10.1039/B203771H

  8. [8]

     Dintcheva N T, Morici E, Arrigo R, et al. Express Polym. Lett., 2012, 6(7):561-571 doi: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.59

  9. [9]

     Milliman H W, Ishida H, Schiraldi D A. Macromolecules, 2012, 45(11):4650-4657 doi: 10.1021/ma3002214

  10. [10]

      Fina A, Monticelli O, Camino G. J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20(42):9297-9305 doi: 10.1039/c0jm00480d

  11. [11]

      Zhang Y D, Lee S H, Yoonessi M, et al. J. Inorg. Orgnomet. Polym. Mater., 2007, 17(1):159-171 doi: 10.1007/s10904-006-9074-3

  12. [12]

      Liu H, Zhu Q, Feng L, et al. Mol. Struct., 2013, 1032:29-34 doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2012.07.045

  13. [13]

      Solouk A, Cousins B G, Mirahmadi F, et al. Mater. Sci. Eng. C-Mater., 2015, 46:400-408 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.10.065

  14. [14]

      Wang C Y, Chen W T, Xu C, et al. Chinese J. Polym. Sci., 2016, 34(11):1363-1372 doi: 10.1007/s10118-016-1845-x

  15. [15]

      Sharma A K, Sloan R, Ramakrishnan R, et al. Polymer, 2018, 139:201-212 doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.02.014

  16. [16]

      Ni Y, Zheng S X, Nie K M. Polymer, 2004, 45:5557-5568 doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.06.008

  17. [17]

      Verker R, Grossman E, Eliaz N. Acta Mater., 2009, 57(4):1112-1119 doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.054

  18. [18]

      Wu Y R, Wu Y C, Kuo S W. Macromol. Chem. Phys., 2013, 214(13):1496-1503 doi: 10.1002/macp.201300251

  19. [19]

      Matsuno H, Tsukamoto R, Shimomura S, et al. Polymer J., 2016, 48(4):413-419 doi: 10.1038/pj.2015.118

  20. [20]

      Michalowski S, Hebda E, Pielichowski K. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2017, 130(1):155-163 doi: 10.1007/s10973-017-6391-4

  21. [21]

      Jeon J E, Kim H H, Jo N J. J. Nanosci. Nanotechno., 2019, 19(3):1463-1469 doi: 10.1166/jnn.2019.16244

  22. [22]

      Takala M, Karttunen M, Pelto J, et al. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 2008, 15(5):1224-1235 doi: 10.1109/TDEI.2008.4656229

  23. [23]

      Liu K, Lu S R, Li S R, et al. Iran Polym. J., 2012, 21(3):497-503 doi: 10.1007/s13726-012-0054-x

  24. [24]

      Kumar B P, Vijaykumar B V D, Raghavan C M, et al. J. Mater. Sci., 2013, 48(21):7533-7539 doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7568-2

  25. [25]

      Lee C W, Josse Y, Hsu C H, et al. Eur. Phys. J.-Appl. Phys., 2008, 42(6):213-218 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231750553_Green_emitting_polyhedral_oligomeric_silsesquioxanes_polyphenylene_vinylene_derivative_materials_for_highly_efficient_organic_light_emitting_diodes_OLEDs

  26. [26]

      Li J, Xie B, Xia K, et al. Opt. Mater., 2018, 78:279-284 doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.01.050

  27. [27]

      胡皓, 李颖.有色金属材料与工程, 2018, 39(2):23-27 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SHHA201802005.htmHU Hao, LI Ying. Nonfer. Met. Mater. Eng., 2018, 39(2):23-27 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SHHA201802005.htm

  28. [28]

      Zhao Y L, Qiu X L, Yu T Z, et al. Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2016, 445:134-139 doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2016.02.031

  29. [29]

      Mohamed M G, Hsu K C, Hong J L, et al. Polym. Chem., 2016, 7(1):135-145 doi: 10.1039/C5PY01537E

  30. [30]

      Mohamed M G, Jheng Y R, Yeh S L, et al. Polymers, 2017, 9(3):103

  31. [31]

      Dasog M, Yang Z Y, Regli S, et al. ACS Nano, 2013, 7(3):2676-2685 doi: 10.1021/nn4000644

• 

  Scheme 1  Chemical structures of: (a) aminopropyl isobutyl POSS (AIPOSS); (b) octal isobutyl POSS (OIPOSS)

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 1  A1: F-AIPOSS/THF solution; A2: AIPOSS/THF solution; B3: F-OIPOSS/THF solution; B4: OIPOSS/THF solution; C1 and C3: Photographs of F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS in the solid state under 365 nm UV illumination, respectively; D: Photographs of A1, A2, B3, and B4 under 365 nm UV illumination, respectively

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  PL spectra of F-AIPOSS, AIPOSS, F-OIPOSS, and OIPOSS solutions in THF (1 mmol·L^-1) under different excitation wavelength

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  PL spectra of F-AIPOSS and F-OIPOSS under different excitation wavelength in the solid state

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  ²⁹Si NMR spectra of F-AIPOSS and AIPOSS in CDCl₃

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 5  ²⁹Si NMR spectra of F-OIPOSS and OIPOSS in CDCl₃

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 6  FTIR spectra of F-AIPOSS, AIPOSS, F-OIPOSS and OIPOSS

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 7  High resolution XPS spectrum of Si2p region of the F-AIPOSS

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Table 1.  Excitation wavelength for maximum (λ_{Ex, max}) and minimum (λ_{Ex, min}) emission intensity of the POSS samples

  	λEx, max / nm	λEx, min / nm
  F-AIPOSS/THF solution	380	360
  AIPOSS/THF solution	360	380
  F-OIPOSS/THF solution	370	360
  OIPOSS/THF solution	360	370
  F-AIPOSS in solid state	350	380
  F-OIPOSS in solid state	340	380

  下载: 导出CSV
•