English

• 0.   Introduction

  Cancer remains a major cause of death in most countries in the world and the incidence of cancer increases with age^[1]. To achieve the efficacy, the traditional chemo-therapy requires high doses of cancer drug reaching the tumor site through the blood circulation. For one thing, the drug utilization is very low, for another, high cytotoxicity of the drug always causes serious side effects in the normal tissue site. Thus, ideal drug delivery systems (DDSs) are sought much needed. As one of the DDSs to treat cancer, nanotherapeutic systems can protect the drug from releasing prematurely. In addition, they have other unique advantages: increased stability of anti-cancer drugs in blood, decreased non-specific toxicity, and easy modification of particle surface for targeting systems^[2-4]. To date, plentiful nanotherapeutic systems have been developed and exemplified regarding traditional systems such as liposomes^[5-6], polymer-based therapeutics^[7-8], carbon nanotubes^[9], and silica particles^[10-11] etc.

  Since Vallet-Regí et al.^[12] firstly reported MCM-41 mesoporous silica as drug carrier of ibuprofen for controlled release in the year of 2001, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) have opened up new and exciting possibilities in the field of cancer cure^[13-17]. Silica has been approved by the United State Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) as "Generally Recognised As Safe" and by the European Union (EU) for its use in cosmetics and food additives^[18]. In particular, the applications of MSNs in drug delivery have been intensively focused. MSNs possess several attractive features such as large surface area with abundant activity of Si-OH, which could easily immobilize various functional materials in the external surface of the MSNs before surfactant removal to generate multifunctional nanomedical platforms for multimodal imaging or simultaneous diagnosis and therapy^[19-21]. On the other hand, mesoporous silica nanoparticles are solid materials which are comprised of a honeycomb-like rigid porous structure with hundreds of empty channels (mesopores) that are able to absorb/encapsulate relatively large amounts of therapy drug molecules under mild conditions. Furthermore, the MSNs also have the ability to effectively protect the entrapped molecules from premature release and degradation due to their excellent bio-stability under physiological conditions^[22]. As a result of their excellent biocompatibility, modifiable external surface with abundant Si-OH, large surface area, high pore volume, and adjustable pore size, MSNs are developed to be one of the most important candidates for drug carriers^[23-27].

  In this contribution, MSNs functionalized orderly with amino groups and FITC were prepared as shown in Scheme 1. The weak base type drug doxorubicin (DOX), a classic anticancer drug in clinic, was used as the model drug to assess the drug loading and releasing behaviors of the carriers. The in vitro cellular cytotoxicity test was performed to evaluate the biocompatibility of MSNs-FITC, and the cytotoxic effect of DOX@MSNs-FITC to Hela cells was also investigated. Cell uptake of MSNs was monitored by CLSM and Flow Cytometry (FCM). The results reported here support the potential of amino-functionalized MSNs as a nanocarrier for simultaneous controlled drug release based on the low pH value in cancer/tumors and fluorescent bioimaging.

  Scheme 1

  

  Scheme 1.  Schematic illustration for the preparation of MSNs-FITC and cell uptake

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  1.   Experimental

  1.1   Materials

  Cetyltrimethyl ammonium chloride (CTAC, 98%), tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS, 99%), and diethanola-mine (DEA, 98%) were obtained from Shanghai Chemical Reagents Company (Shanghai, China). Doxorubicin (DOX) and [3-(2-aminoethyl)aminopropyl]trimethoxysilane (APTES) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (America). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was purchased from Alfa Aesar (America). Hela cells were obtained from Chinese Academy of Sciences Cells Bank (Shanghai, China). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazo-lium bromide (MTT) and 2-(4-amidinophenyl)-6-indo-lecarbamidine dihydrochloride (DAPI) were purchased from Beyotime (Shanghai, China). Dulbeccos modified Eagle medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillinstreptomycin solution and Trypsin-EDTA solution were obtained from Gibco (America). All the chemicals were of analytical grade and used without further treatment. All solutions were prepared and diluted using ultrapure water from the Millipore Milli-Q system.

  1.2   Characterization

  The morphology and structure of MSNs samples were characterized via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). TEM micrographs were obtained on a FEI Tecnai G2S-Twin microscope with a field emission gun operating at 200 kV. SEM micrographs were obtained on a JEOL JSM-6700F microscope with acceleration voltage of 10 kV. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Rigaku D/Max 2550 X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (40 kV, 20 mA) at λ=0.154 18 nm with a scanning rate of 1°·min^-1 over a range of 0.8°~6.0° (2θ) with a step width of 0.02°. The pore chara-cteristics of the samples were studied by determining the nitrogen adsorption using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020M system. Their surface area was calculated by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) approach and the pore size distributions were obtained by the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method. FTIR measurement was recorded on a Bruker IFS 66V/S FTIR spectrometer using KBr pellets as background. UV-Vis absorption spectra were performed using a Thermo EV-60 spectro-photometer in the range between 1 000 and 300 nm. Intracellular tracking was subjected to be observed with FV1000 confocal laser scanning microscopy. Transfer capability was recorded by BD FACS Calibur Flow cytometry.

  1.3   Synthesis of mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs)

  MSNs were synthesized with the sol-gel method. The following is a typical synthesis example: 6.4 mL water (0.36 mol), 0.9 g ethanol (0.015 mol), 1.04 g of a 25%(w/w) CTAC solution (0.786 mmol), and 0.02 g DEA (0.19 mmol) were mixed and stirred vigorously at 40 ℃ for 30 min. Then 0.73 mL TEOS (3.25 mmol) was added dropwise into the above solution within 2 min and the mixture was continously under stirring for another 2 h. Finally, with the resulting white solution being cooled to room temperature, the particles (denoted as CTAC/MSNs) were collected by centrifuga-tion and washed several times by water and methanol alternately. The surfactant CTAC was then removed by reflux in a mixture of 70 mL methanol and 0.70 mL concentrated 37.2%(w/w) HCl at 80 ℃ for 6 h. The resulting particles (denoted as MSNs) were then collected in the same way as CTAC/MSNs.

  1.4   Synthesis of fluorescent MSNs-FITC

  A typical synthesis procedure was depicted as following: 1 mg FITC was reacted with 5 μL APTES in 1 mL absolute ethanol by stirring for 24 h in darkness at room temperature to obtain the FITC-conjugated APTES (APTES-FITC). Then 20 μL APTES-FITC was mixed with the as-synthesized CTAC/MSNs for further 2 h stirring in darkness at 40 ℃. The solution was cooled to room temperature and collected by centrifugation (denoted as CTAC/MSNs-FITC). Similarly, the surfactant-free particles (denoted as MSNs-FITC) were obtained by extraction as mentioned above.

  1.5   Loading and release of DOX

  DOX was used as a model drug molecules agent to evaluate the drug loading and releasing manner. Typically, 4 mg MSNs-FITC were immersed in 4 mL buffered solution at pH of 7.4 containing 560 μg DOX. After stirring for 24 h under light-sealed conditions, the mixture was centrifuged and the supernatant was removed. The DOX@MSNs-FITC were obtained and washed twice with PBS solution to wash away the DOX adsorbed on the external surface. The supernatant solution concentration was calculated based on absorbance intensity at 483 nm via UV-Vis spectroscopy (Thermo EV-60, American). DOX loading capacity (C_load) and entrapment efficiency (η_entrapment) in the nanoparticles were calculated by the following equations:

  $ {C_{{\rm{load }}}} = \frac{{{M_{{\rm{load }}}}}}{{{M_{{\rm{nanoparticles }}}}}} \times 100\% $

  $ {\eta _{{\rm{entrapment }}}} = \frac{{{M_{{\rm{load }}}}}}{{{M_{{\rm{feed }}}}}} \times 100\% $

  Where M_load is the mass of DOX loaded into nano-particles (mg), M_{nanoparticles} is the mass of nanoparticles (g), M_feed is the mass of DOX in feed (mg).

  The release kinetics of DOX from DOX@MSNs-FITC were carried out in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) at 37 ℃ and shaken at 120 r·min^-1. 4 mg DOX@MSNs-FITC were dispersed in 4 mL PBS (pH=7.4, 5.5, and 4.6, respectively), followed by 1 mL of solution collected at timed intervals. The volume of the release medium kept constant by adding 1 mL fresh medium after each sampling. The released DOX was analyzed by UV-Vis. The releasing efficiency (η_release) was calculated by the following equations:

  $ {\eta _{{\rm{release }}}} = \frac{{{M_{{\rm{release }}}}}}{{{M_{{\rm{load }}}}}} \times 100\% $

  Where M_release is the mass of DOX in the release medium (mg).

  1.6   Cell viability assay

  Hela cells were cultured as a monolayer in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% (V/V) FBS at 37 ℃ in a humidified incubator (5%(V/V) CO₂ in air). The MTT assay was used to measure cell viability. Briefly, cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1×10⁴ cells per well and four duplicate wells were set up in each sample. After incubation for 24 h at 37 ℃ in 100 μL DMEM medium containing 10% FBS, culture medium was discarded and then cells were treated with free DOX, DOX@MSNs-FITC or blank MSNs-FITC at various concentrations. After incubation for 24 h, 20 μL of MTT solution (5 mg·mL^-1) was added to each well and the plate was incubated in the CO₂ incubator for an additional 4 h. The precipitated formazan violet crystals were dissolved in 150 μL of DMSO. The optical density (OD) value of each individual well was calculated using a spectrophotometer (Thermo MK3, American) at 570 nm absorbance. With untreated cells in medium used as a control and corresponding groups without cells used as blanks, all experiments were carried out with four replicates.

  1.7   Confocal microscopy assay

  The Hela cells were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 3×10⁴ cells per well respectively. After a 24 h incubation period, the cells were treated with MSNs-FITC at various concentrations for 4 h. Then culture medium was removed, cells were swashed with PBS three times. After the removal of supernatants, the cells were fixed with 4% (w/V, g·mL^-1) paraformal-dehyde for 30 min. Subsequently, the slides were rinsed with PBS three times and the cells were stained with DAPI for 10 min. Finally, the intracellular localizations of MSNs-FITC were directly visualized with CLSM. In the assay, all experiments were carried out under a light-sealed condition.

  1.8   Flow cytometry analysis

  FCM was used to demonstrate the transfer capability of the MSNs-FITC nanoparticles into cells. Hela cells were seeded into a 6-well plate (5×10⁵ cells per well), and cultured for 24 h, then treated with MSNs-FITC at various concentrations with the untreated cells used as blank control. After incubating for 4 h, the media was removed, and the cells were swashed twice with PBS buffer to remove residual nanoparticles. Then, with the cells being harvested with 0.25% (V/V) trypsin solution, washed with PBS buffer three times, and finally suspended in PBS, the signals of FITC fluorescence were recorded by FCM. In the assay, all experiments were carried out under a light-sealed condition to avoid photo bleaching.

  2.   Results and discussion

  2.1   Preparation and characterization

  The MSNs were synthesized using a base-catalyzed sol-gel method with TEOS as the silica precursor, the CTAC surfactant as the template and Diethanolamine as the catalyst. The MSNs were then functionalized with FITC by one-pot procedure grafting to obtain the APTES-FITC functionalized MSNs. The size and pore structure of the MSNs-FITC were characterized by SEM, TEM, FT-IR and N₂ adsorption-desorption test.

  TEM image showed MSNs-FITC as rough spheres with an average size of approximately 150 nm in diameter (Fig. 1A). The SEM image also showed that the spherical MSNs-FITC were well dispersed without any obvious aggregation (Fig. 1B).

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  (A) TEM image of the synthesized MSNs-FITC and (B) SEM image of the synthesized MSNs-FITC

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  Small-angle XRD patterns of the (A) MSNs and (B) MSNs-FITC

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  The pore structure of MSNs before and after the functionalization was examined using small-angle powder XRD. Both MSNs and MSNs-FITC showed two broad peaks which suggested short-range ordering and a wormlike pore structure inside the nanoparticles. It could be revealed that the fluorescence groups were functionalized on MSNs successfully as a result of the decrease in intensity and slight change in the position of the peaks.

  In order to form mesoporous structure, CTAC surfactants in the pore had to be removed by extraction. In addition, the residual CTAC surfactants would bring cytotoxicity and decreased the biocompatibility of carriers. As shown in the FT-IR spectra of CTAC/MSNs (Fig. 3A), owing to the large amount of CTAC present in the channel, CTAC/MSNs gave the characteristic C-H stretching vibrations at 2 924 and 2 854 cm^-1, and C-H deformation vibration around 1 478 cm^{-1 [28]}. After removal of CTAC, these C-H peaks derived from CTAC disappeared, suggesting that the CTAC molecules had been removed successfully (Fig. 3B). Peaks at 3 390 and 1 635 cm^-1 were assigned to H-O-H groups present on the surface of MSNs or due to water molecules adsorbed^[29]. The peaks at 1 086, 801 and 463 cm^-1 were all characteristic absorbance bands of silica, and corresponded to Si-O-Si asymmetric stretching, Si-O-Si symmetric stretching and Si-O-Si bending, respectively^[30]. However, the MSNs-FITC showed the C-H bonds at 2 924, 2 854, 1 480 cm^-1 again and C=O bonds at 1 728 cm^{-1 [31]} after further grafting APTES-FITC (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, a clear IR peak centered at 1 558 cm^-1 appeared and could be assigned to the N-H bonds^[32], which revealed that the functionalization of fluorescence groups was successful.

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  FT-IR spectra of (A) CTAC/MSNs, (B) MSNs and (C) MSNs-FITC

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  To further verify the successful grafting of FITC on the MSNs, UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy was utilized as shown in Fig. 4, which displayed that the successfully FITC-conjuncted with APTES (APTES-FITC) in water exhibited the main absorption bands at 496 nm (Fig. 4A). This band was also present in the spectrum of MSNs-FITC (Fig. 4B), indicating a successful conjugation of FITC on MSNs successfully, which also can be proved by the strong green fluorescence of MSNs-FITC irradiated with UV lamp (right), but no fluorescence irradiated with white lamp (left) in the inset photographs.

  Figure 4

  

  Figure 4.  UV-Vis absorption spectra of (A) APTES-FITC and (B) MSNs-FITC

  Insets are photographs of MSNs-FITC dispersed in PBS under white light (left), and MSNs-FITC dispersed in PBS under UV light (right) situations

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  2.2   Drug loading and in vitro release of DOX

  To evaluate the drug loading capacity and releasing behaviour of MSNs-FITC, a classic water-soluble anticancer drug DOX was used as a model drug. The nanocarrier was loaded with DOX by soaking them in a concentrated drug-PBS solution at pH value of 7.4, then collected by centrifugation and washed with PBS several times. UV-Vis spectroscopy was used to determine the DOX loading capacity and release properties. As shown in Fig. 5, the DOX was loaded in nanocarrier with different concentrations, the drug loading content increased along with the increase of the DOX concentration. When the conce-ntration was less than 140 μg·mL^-1, the drug loading content quickly increased, and DOX loading capacity and entrapment efficiency reached 91.96 mg·g^-1 (8.42%(w/w)) and 65.7% at the concentration of 140 μg·mL^-1. But it increased slowly once the concentra-tion was between 140 and 180 μg·mL^-1. Moreover, with the concentration raising to 180 and 200 μg·mL^-1, the loading capacity hardly increased and approxi-mately reached saturation, which demonstrated that the continuously increased concentration would not lead to increased encapsulation efficiency.

  Figure 5

  

  Figure 5.  Loading capacity of MSNs-FITC in different DOX concentrations

  Results are expressed as mean ± the standard error from three independent experiments

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  To prove that the DOX molecules could penetrate into the hole of mesopores of the MSNs-FITC, BET analysis was also carried out as shown in Fig. 6. The specific surface area and cumulative pore volume of the nude MSNs-FITC were calculated to be 861 m²·g^-1 and 1.48 cm³·g^-1. However, after drug loading, the values of calculated specific surface area and cumula-tive pore volume of the materials decreased to about 148 m²·g^-1 and 0.99 cm³·g^-1, respectively. Further-more, the average pore size measured before and after the DOX loading were 2.2 and 1.8 nm respectively. As the results clearly indicated, the BET surface area, pore volume, and pore diameter of MSNs-FITC were all decreased significantly after the loading of DOX, suggesting the DOX molecules had penetrated into the nanopores.

  Figure 6

  

  Figure 6.  Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of (A) MSNs-FITC and (B) DOX@MSNs-FITC

  Inset: corresponding pore size distributions

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  The studies of DOX released from DOX@MSNs-FITC were conducted under different PBS buffer solutions at pH values of 7.4, 5.5, as well as 4.6 at 37 ℃. The in vitro cumulative drug release profiles over a period of 48 h were shown in Fig. 7. The results demonstrated that the DOX release performance was obviously pH dependent and cumulative release amount increased with the decrease of pH. At pH value of 7.4, the release amount was quite low and only approximately 38%(w/w) was released in 24 h. At pH value of 5.5, the release amount gradually increased to 71%(w/w) in 24 h and exhibited relatively faster release rate. Subsequently, when pH value decreased to 4.6, a faster release behavior was obtained and the release amount reached 89%(w/w) in 24 h. This is because the drug release was mainly determined by the effect of electrostatic interaction between DOX molecules and the nanoparticles surface. It is known that the pK_a of DOX is 8.3 adjacently, so most amine groups of DOX exist as protonated forms (-NH₃⁺ forms) in the range of pH values examined here^[33]. On the other hand, the pK_a of Si-OH on the internal surface of MSNs ranged from 4 to 5. It means that the higher the pH value of the medium was, the more negative charges were on the internal surface of the mesopores, the stronger attraction existed between the positively charged DOX and the negatively charged carriers, so the more difficult for the loaded DOX to be released out of the nanoparticles^[34-35]. It is well documented that pH values in different tissues and cellular compartments vary significantly. For example, the tumor extracellular environment is more acidic (pH=6.8) than blood and normal tissues (pH=7.4), and the pH values of late endosome and lysosome are even lower, at 5.0~5.5^[36-37]. So the sustained release properties are favorable for increased drug accumula-tion in the cytoplasm of cancer cells following endocy-tosis and reduced drug release from the carriers in normal tissue, and can thus enhance the long-term chemotherapy efficacy and reduce non-specificity toxicity.

  Figure 7

  

  Figure 7.  In vitro DOX release profiles from MSNs-FITC at different pH values

  Results are expressed as mean ± the standard error from three independent experiments

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  2.3   In vitro cell cytotoxicity assay and cell uptake

  An efficient drug delivery system should not only have sustained release properties, but also possess favorable biocompatibility. The in vitro cytotoxicity in Hela cells was investigated by MTT assay as shown in Fig. 8. The blank MSNs-FITC had a negligible cytotoxicity after being cultured with Hela cells for 24 h, even at concentrations as high as 100 μg·mL^-1. The well biocompatible on Hela cells could be attributed to the relatively low concentration of the surfactants in MSNs-FITC. To further demonstrate the pharmacolo-gical activity of the DOX@MSNs-FITC, their cytotoxic effects were also tested. Conversely, when the Hela cells were treated with either free DOX solution or the suspension of DOX@MSNs-FITC with equal DOX dosage, the result exhibited increased cytotoxicity with the increase of the concentration of the DOX. But DOX@MSNs-FITC showed stronger effect on killing tumor cells than free DOX at the same dosage^[38-39]. This may be because the carrier loading DOX is more biocompatible than the free DOX, so it can easily disguise as harmless substances to enter the cells by endocytosis. Once the carrier entered into the cytoplasm of the cell, it began to release the loading drug molecules due to the acidic surroundings thereby causing more cell death as a result of the high intracellular concentration of DOX. Free DOX will be excluded in the process of endocytosis thereby causing less cell death due to the low intracellular concentra-tion of DOX. Therefore, it could be concluded that MSNs-FITC have been a promising potential candidate for drug loading and delivery in cancer therapy.

  Figure 8

  

  Figure 8.  Cytotoxicity of blank nanoparticles, free DOX and equivalent DOX concentration of DOX-loaded nanoparticles in Hela cells for 24 h

  Results are expressed as means ± the standard error from three independent experiments

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Effective endocytosis of the nanocarriers by cancer cell is a critical role for intracellular drug delivery. CLSM analysis was performed to examine the cellular endocytosis and sequential distribution of nanocarriers. Fig. 9 showed the CLSM images of Hela cells cultivated with different MSNs-FITC concentra-tions at 50, 80 and 100 μg·mL^-1. To confirm the efficient uptake of the nanocarriers by cancer cells, different concentrations of MSNs-FITC were incubated with Hela cells in DMEM at 37 ℃ for 4 h. The blue regions represent the signal from the nucleus stained with DAPI, and the green regions are the signal from FITC. The green fluorescence could be observed clearly in almost all of the cells from the CLSM images and distributed around nucleus intensively, demonstrating that these nanocarriers could penetrate the plasma membrane of Hela cells and transferred into the cytoplasm with high efficiency. Moreover, the intensity of green fluorescence could be obviously recognized after incubation at 100 μg·mL^-1, which was stronger than that incubated at 50 μg·mL^-1, suggesting the dose-dependent endocytosis by Hela cells^[40]. This evidence visually confirms that MSNs-FITC can be used as a transmembrane delivery carrier for potential drug delivery and as a fluorescent tracer for live cell imaging with realtime monitoring properties.

  Figure 9

  

  Figure 9.  Confocal laser scanning microscope images of Hela cells cultivated with different concentrations of MSNs-FITC at 50, 80 and 100 μg·mL^-1

  Blue fluorescence shows nuclei stained with DAPI. Green fluorescence shows the location of MSNs-FITC. The scale bar is 20 μm

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Dose-depended internalization of MSNs-FITC was further investigated by FCM analysis. Fig. 10 showed FCM histogram profiles of Hela cells treated with different concentrations of MSNs-FITC at 50, 80 and 100 μg·mL^-1, respectively. Meanwhile, the FCM histogram profiles of Hela cells showed quantifica-tionally the changes of fluorescence intensity. It is clear that the fluorescence intensity increased obviously with increased concentrations of MSNs-FITC, which was consistent with the data of CLSM analysis, indicating effectively dose-depended internalization of MSNs-FITC.

  Figure 10

  

  Figure 10.  FCM histogram profiles of Hela cells treated with different concentration of MSNs-FITC at 50, 80 and 100 μg·mL^-1, respectively

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  3.   Conclusions

  In summary, a drug delivery system mesoporous silica nanoparticles were prepared via a base-catalyzed sol-gel method. The well-defined nano-particles were confirmed by the results from SEM, TEM, FTIR, BET, and UV-Vis spectra. DOX was applied as model drug to investigate drug loading and releasing behaviors. The nanoparticles possessed both high loading capacity (8.42%(w/w)) and encapsulation efficiency (65.7%). The cumulative release of DOX@ MSNs-FITC showed a low leakage at pH value of 7.4 with only 38% amount being released after 24 h while significantly enhanced to 89% at pH value of 4.6. These results demonstrated that the drug release system was pH dependent apparently. The MTT cytotoxicity assay confirmed that the blank nanocarrier MSNs-FITC were almost non cytotoxicity on Hela cells even at 100 μg·mL^-1 after incubation for 24 h. CLSM analysis demonstrated that these can penetrate the plasma membrane of Hela cells and transfer into the cytoplasm with high efficiency. FCM analysis indicated the internalization of nanocarriers was dose-depended. For further applications, the outermost surface of the MSNs-FITC should also be modified with pH-responsive ligands (e.g., polymer, supramolecular assemblies or inorganic nanoparticles) to enhance the delivery efficiency and minimize adverse side effects.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2018, 68:394-424 doi: 10.3322/caac.21492

  2. [2]

     Gao F P, Li L L, Fu C H, et al. Adv. Mater., 2013, 25(38):5508-5513 doi: 10.1002/adma.201301217

  3. [3]

     Chen X L, Sun H, Hu J, et al. Colloids Surf. B, 2017, 152:77-84 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.01.010

  4. [4]

     Guo Y M, Li H, Shi W K, et al. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 502:59-66 doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.04.085

  5. [5]

     Zhang P F, Zhang L, Qin Z N, et al. Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(7):1705350 doi: 10.1002/adma.201705350

  6. [6]

     Akhtar N, Khan R A. Prog. Lipid Res., 2016, 64:192-230 doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2016.08.005

  7. [7]

     Shen H J, Shi H, Ma K, et al. Acta Biomater., 2013, 9(4):6123-6133 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.024

  8. [8]

     Yang J Y, Kopeek J. J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol., 2015, 30(Part B):318-330

  9. [9]

     Sun H, She P, Lu G L, et al. J. Mater. Sci., 2014, 49(20):6845-6854 doi: 10.1007/s10853-014-8436-4

  10. [10]

      Li T T, Shi S X, Goel S, et al. Acta Biomater., 2019, 89:1-13 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.031

  11. [11]

      Diab R, Canilho N, Pavel I A, et al. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 249:346-362 doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2017.04.005

  12. [12]

      Vallet-Regí M, Rámila A, del Real R P, et al. Chem. Mater., 2001, 13(2):308-311 doi: 10.1021/cm0011559

  13. [13]

      Hao N J, Jayawardana K W, Chen X, et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7(2):1040-1045 doi: 10.1021/am508219g

  14. [14]

      Mai T B, Tran T N, Islam M R, et al. J. Mater. Sci., 2014, 49(4):1519-1526 doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7833-4

  15. [15]

      Tian Y, Glogowska A, Zhong W, et al. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2013, 1(39):5264-5272 doi: 10.1039/c3tb20544d

  16. [16]

      Martínez C M, Lozano D, Colilla M, et al. Acta Biomater., 2018, 65:393-404 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.007

  17. [17]

      Hu L L, Meng J, Zhang D D, et al. Talanta, 2018, 177:203-211 doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.07.017

  18. [18]

      Steven C R, Busby G A, Mather C, et al. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2014, 2:5028-5042 doi: 10.1039/C4TB00510D

  19. [19]

      Lee J E, Lee D J, Lee N, et al. J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21:16869-16872 doi: 10.1039/c1jm11869b

  20. [20]

      Kwon S, Singh R K, Kim T H, et al. Acta Biomater., 2014, 10(3):1431-1442 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.028

  21. [21]

      Zhang Y, Hsu B Y W, Ren C L, et al. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44(1):315-335

  22. [22]

      Yuan L, Tang Q Q, Yang D, et al. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115(20):9926-9932 doi: 10.1021/jp201053d

  23. [23]

      Nguyen C T H, Webb R I, Lambert L K, et al. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9(11):9470-9483 doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b00411

  24. [24]

      Begum G, Laxmi M V, Rana R K, et al. J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22:22174-22180 doi: 10.1039/c2jm32898d

  25. [25]

      Zhang S L, Chu Z Q, Yin C, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135(15):5709-5716 doi: 10.1021/ja3123015

  26. [26]

      Hao W J, Shen Y X, Liu D Y, et al. RSC Adv., 2017, 7:851-860 doi: 10.1039/C6RA25224A

  27. [27]

      Narayan R, Nayak U Y, Raichur A M, et al. Pharmaceutics, 2018, 10:118 doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics10030118

  28. [28]

      Wang J, Liu H Y, Leng F, et al. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2014, 186(1):187-193

  29. [29]

      Hong C Y, Li X, Pan C Y. J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19(29):5155-5160

  30. [30]

      Hu X X, Hao X H, Wu Y, et al. J. Mater. Chem. B, 2013, 1:1109-1118 doi: 10.1039/c2tb00223j

  31. [31]

      Jiao Y F, Guo J, Shen S, et al. J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22(34):17636-17643 doi: 10.1039/c2jm31821k

  32. [32]

      Rim H P, Min K H, Lee H J, et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50(38):8853-8857 doi: 10.1002/anie.201101536

  33. [33]

      Chen Y Y, Ma P A, Yang D M, et al. Chem. Asian J., 2014, 9(2):506-513 doi: 10.1002/asia.201301262

  34. [34]

      Gu J L, Su S S, Zhu M J, et al. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2012, 161:160-167 doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.05.035

  35. [35]

      Song G S, Li C, Hu J Q, et al. J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22(33):17011-17018

  36. [36]

      Mei X, Chen D Y, Li N J, et al. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2012, 152:16-24 doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.12.015

  37. [37]

      Popat A, Liu J, Lu G Q, et al. J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22:11173-11178 doi: 10.1039/c2jm30501a

  38. [38]

      Yu C M, Gao C M, Lü S Y, et al. Colloids Surf. B, 2014, 115:331-339 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.12.023

  39. [39]

      Zhao Z H, Huang D T, Yin Z Y, et al. J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22:15717-15725 doi: 10.1039/c2jm31692g

  40. [40]

      Zhang Y Z, Wang J C, Bai X Y, et al. Mol. Pharmaceutics, 2012, 9(3):505-513 doi: 10.1021/mp200287c

• 

  Scheme 1  Schematic illustration for the preparation of MSNs-FITC and cell uptake

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 1  (A) TEM image of the synthesized MSNs-FITC and (B) SEM image of the synthesized MSNs-FITC

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  Small-angle XRD patterns of the (A) MSNs and (B) MSNs-FITC

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  FT-IR spectra of (A) CTAC/MSNs, (B) MSNs and (C) MSNs-FITC

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 4  UV-Vis absorption spectra of (A) APTES-FITC and (B) MSNs-FITC

  Insets are photographs of MSNs-FITC dispersed in PBS under white light (left), and MSNs-FITC dispersed in PBS under UV light (right) situations

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 5  Loading capacity of MSNs-FITC in different DOX concentrations

  Results are expressed as mean ± the standard error from three independent experiments

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 6  Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of (A) MSNs-FITC and (B) DOX@MSNs-FITC

  Inset: corresponding pore size distributions

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 7  In vitro DOX release profiles from MSNs-FITC at different pH values

  Results are expressed as mean ± the standard error from three independent experiments

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 8  Cytotoxicity of blank nanoparticles, free DOX and equivalent DOX concentration of DOX-loaded nanoparticles in Hela cells for 24 h

  Results are expressed as means ± the standard error from three independent experiments

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 9  Confocal laser scanning microscope images of Hela cells cultivated with different concentrations of MSNs-FITC at 50, 80 and 100 μg·mL^-1

  Blue fluorescence shows nuclei stained with DAPI. Green fluorescence shows the location of MSNs-FITC. The scale bar is 20 μm

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 10  FCM histogram profiles of Hela cells treated with different concentration of MSNs-FITC at 50, 80 and 100 μg·mL^-1, respectively

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
•