

两个salen型卤代希夫碱Ni(Ⅱ)配合物的合成、晶体结构及Hirshfeld表面分析
-
关键词:
- 卤代希夫碱
- / 晶体结构
- / 弱交换作用
- / Hirshfeld表面分析
English
Syntheses, Crystal Structures, Hirshfeld Surface Analysis of Two Salen-Type Halogenated Schiff-Base Ni(Ⅱ) Complexes
-
0. Introduction
Supramolecular chemistry is an important research field including multiple-subject ranging from pharmaceutics to nanotechnology industries[1-4]. During the last decade, great efforts have been devoted to the rational design and synthesis of supramolecular aggregates with desired structure and properties[5-7].
Different supramolecular interaction resulting in different solid geometry and even physicochemical properties, such as activity of pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), magnetic behavior of molecular magnets. As is known to all, chemical reactivity and properties of organic compound are differed wildly by substitution of halogen atom[8-10]. Furthermore, halogen atom has recently been recognized as an important factor in mediation the supramolecular network of crystalline materials[11-12]. However, compared with the classic hydrogen-bond interactions, the contact formed by halogen atom is much weaker, so it is difficult to carry out qualitative and quantitative research, especially for the N- and O- rich ligands constructing supramolecular complex[13-15]. Hence, related work is still at a very early stage.
Therefore, establishing a series of halogenated ligands constructing complexes with similar structure and composition is a fundamental way for detailed recognition of the intermolecular interactions formed by halogen atom. In this aspect, tetradentate Schiff base (salen) complex is an ideal candidate, not only because the complex has diverse structures and tunable constitution[16-18], but also because it is a well researched subject. Thus, subtle difference between analogs can be easily detected and studied[19-20].
Based on the aforementioned considerations, recently, we have initiated exploitation of the relationship between the composition of salen-type halogenated Schiff-base ligands and the structure of their complexes. Herein, we specifically introduced isomorphic halogenated salen as starting material, and isolated two nickel(Ⅱ) complexes [Ni(3, 5-Cl-salcy)] (1) and [Ni(3-Cl-salcy)] (2) (3, 5-Cl-salcyH2=N, N′-(±)-bis(3, 5-dichlorosalicylidene)cyclohexane-1, 2-diamine and 3-Cl-salcyH2=N, N′-(±)-bis(3-chlorosalicylidene)cyclo-hexane-1, 2-diamine). Theoretical analysis results reveal that halogen atoms play a key role in stabling the solid structures of title complexes.
1. Experimental
1.1 Material and methods
All chemicals were commercially available and used without further purification. Elemental analyses (C, H and N) were carried out on a Perkin-Elmer 240C instrument. Ni was analyzed on a PLASMA-SPEC(Ⅰ) ICP atomic emission spectrometer. IR spectra were recorded in a range of 400~4 000 cm-1 on an Alpha Centaurt FT/IR Spectrophotometer using KBr pellets. 1H NMR spectra have been recorded by using Bruker 600 MHz Digital NMR Spectrometer resonance instrument (AVANCE Ⅲ 600 MHz).
1.2 Synthesis
1.2.1 Synthesis of halogenated Schiff base ligand
The halogenated tetradentate Schiff base ligand 3, 5-Cl-salcyH2 and 3-Cl-salcyH2 were prepared by mixing salicylaldehyde (3, 5-dichlorosalicylaldehyd and 3-chlorosalicylaldehyd for 3, 5-Cl-salcyH2 and 3-Cl-salcyH2, respectively) (0.2 mmol) and 1, 2-diaminocy-clohexane (0.012 mL, 0.1 mmol, mixture of cis- and trans- form) in 30mL of methanol. The obtained solution was stirred and refluxed at 80 ℃ for three hours, then the solvent was removed by rotary evaporator to give yellow powder product (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Schematic drawing of halogenated tetradentate Schiff base ligands 3, 5-Cl-salcyH2 and 3-Cl-salcyH23, 5-Cl-salcyH2: Yield: 0.035 2 g (75%). Elemental analysis for C20H18Cl4N2O2(%): C: 52.2; H: 3.94; N: 6.08. Found(%): C: 51.2; H: 3.93; N: 6.13. 1H NMR (600 MHz, methanol-d4): δ 8.38 (d, J=62.4 Hz, 1H, -N=CH-), 7.48~7.10 (m, 2H, ArH), 4.50 (s, 1H, Ar-OH), 3.85 (dt, J=6.7, 3.1 Hz, 1H, -C*H-), 2.06~1.77 (m, 2H, -CH2-), 1.76~1.18 (m, 2H, -CH2-). FT-IR (cm-1): 3 419 (O-H), 1 598 (C=N), 1 389 (-CH2-).
3-Cl-salcyH2: Yield: 0.034 3 g (86%). Elemental analysis for C20H20Cl2N2O2(%): C: 61.39; H: 5.15; N: 7.15. Found(%): C: 61.57; H: 4.60; N: 7.27. 1H NMR (600 MHz, methanol-d4): δ 8.38 (d, J=68.5 Hz, 1H, -N=CH-), 7.57~6.92 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.65 (dt, J=34.9, 7.8 Hz, 1H, Ar-OH), 4.09~3.68 (m, 1H, -C*H-), 2.19~1.79 (m, 2H, -CH2-), 1.78~1.43 (m, 2H, -CH2-). FT-IR (cm-1): 3 432 (O-H), 1 598 (C=N), 1 389 (-CH2-).
1.2.2 Synthesis of [Ni(3, 5-Cl-salcy)] (1)
Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (0.060 0 g, 0.2 mmol) was dissolved in 10 mL methanol, and the solution was added to 20 mL of a methanolic solution of 3, 5-Cl-salcyH2 (0.031 6 g, 0.1 mmol), the resulting dark red suspension was stirred for 2 h. After cooling, the reddish filtrate was sealed in a beaker and kept undisturbed at room temperature. The red block crystals of complex 1 were afforded after one week. Yield: 35%. Anal. Calcd. for C20H16Cl4N2NiO2(%): C, 46.47; H, 3.12; N, 5.42. Found(%): C, 47.13; H, 3.31; N, 5.14.
1.2.3 Synthesis of [Ni(3-Cl-salcy)] (2)
Complex 2 was prepared in a similar method as that of complex 1, except the ligand 3-Cl-salcyH2 (0.024 5 g, 0.1 mmol) was used to replace 3, 5-Cl-salcyH2. The red block crystals of 2 were afforded after one week. Yield: 42%. Anal. Calcd. For C20H18Cl2N2NiO2(%): C, 53.62; H, 4.05; N, 6.25; Found: C, 53.93; H, 4.12; N, 6.14.
1.3 X-ray crystal structure analysis
The data set of reflections were collected at 293(2) K on an Xcalibur Eos automated diffractometer with Mo Kα radiation (λ=0.071 073 nm) and a low-temp-erature device Cryostream cooler (Oxford Cryosystem). Integration of the intensities and correction for Lorentz and polarization effects were performed using the CrysAlisPro software[21-22]. The central nickel atom was located by direct method, and successive Fourier syntheses revealed the remaining atoms. Refinements were achieved by the full-matrix method on F2 using the Olex2 software package[23]. In the final refinement, all the non-H atoms were anisotropically refined. All H atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined using the riding model approximation. For the cyclohexane, C-H bonds were fixed at 0.097 nm, and the Uiso values of the hydrogen atoms of methyl groups were set to 1.5Ueq, C and the Uiso values of all other hydrogen atoms were set to 1.2Ueq, C, with aromatic C-H distances of 0.093 nm. The detailed crystal data and structure refinement for 1 and 2 are given in Table 1. Selective bond lengths and angles of 1 and 2 are listed in Table 2.
Table 1
Complex 1 2 Formula C20H16Cl4N2Ni02 C20H18Cl2N2Ni02 Formula weight 516.84 447.95 Crystal system Monoclinic Triclinic Crystal size / mm 0.20×0.18×0.16 0.18×0.14×0.12 Space group P21/c P1 a / nm 1.352 06(14) 1.174 51(8) b/ nm 1.377 74(10) 1.287 43(8) c / nm 1.247 79(13) 1.356 64(8) α/(°) 86.447(5) β/(°) 117.130(13) 69.997(6) γ/(°) 76.885(6) Volume / nm3 2.068 6(3) 1.877 1(2) Dc/ (g·cm-3) 1.66 1.585 Z 4 1 μ / mm-1 1.475 1.336 Reflection collected, unique (Rint) 8 941, 3 518 (0.029 0) 13 206, 6 592 (0.066 6) Reflection with I > 2σ(I) 1 847 2 695 θ range for data collection / (°) 3.27~25.00 3.34~25.00 Data, restraint, parameter 3 518, 0, 262 6 592, 0, 487 Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.047 0.945 R indices [I > 2σ(I)]a, b R1=0.034 7, wR2=0.072 1 R1=0.058 6, wR2=0.061 0 R indices (all data) R1=0.050 4, wR2=0.080 8 R1=0.129 0, wR2=0.077 1 (Δρ)max, (Δρ)min/ (e·nm-3) 393, -276 409, -438 a R1=||Fo|-|Fc||/|Fo|; b wR2=[w(Fo2-Fc2)2]/[w(Fo2)2]1/2. Table 2
1 Ni(1)-O(2) 0.184 57(18) Ni(1)-0(1) 0.185 32(19) Ni(1)-N(2) 0.185 1(2) Ni(1)-N(1) 0.185 3(2) Ni(1)-Ni(1)ⅰ 0.331 56(7) Cl(1)-C(4) 0.174 0(3) Cl(3)-C(2) 0.173 4(3) Cl(2)-C(17) 0.174 5(3) Cl(4)-C(19) 0.173 3(3) 0(2)-Ni(1)-N(2) 93.93(9) 0(2)-Ni(1)-N(1) 179.74(10) 0(2)-Ni(1)-0(1) 85.61(8) N(2)-Ni(1)-N(1) 85.81(10) N(2)-Ni(1)-0(1) 178.60(9) 0(1)-Ni(1)-N(1) 94.64(9) C(3)-C(2)-Cl(3) 118.6(2) C(5)-C(4)-Cl(1) 119.8(3) C(1)-C(2)-Cl(3) 118.5(2) C(3)-C(4)-Cl(1) 119.5(3) 2 Ni(1)-0(1) 0.183 8(2) Ni(2)-0(3) 0.183 7(2) Ni(1)-0(2) 0.184 4(2) Ni(2)-0(4) 0.184 4(2) Ni(1)-N(2) 0.184 7(3) Ni(2)-N(4) 0.184 6(3) Ni(1)-N(1) 0.185 5(3) Ni(2)-N(3) 0.185 4(3) Ni(1)-Ni(1)ⅱ 0.352 97(2) Ni(2)_Ni(2)ⅲ 0.338 07(10) Cl(1)-C(2) 0.174 0(4) Cl(3)-C(22) 0.174 3(3) Cl(2)-C(19) 0.174 1(4) Cl(4)-C(39) 0.173 4(3) 0(1)-Ni(1)-0(2) 84.26(10) 0(3)-Ni(2)-0(4) 84.02(10) 0(1)-Ni(1)-N(2) 175.91(12) 0(3)-Ni(2)-N(4) 178.18(12) 0(2)-Ni(1)-N(2) 94.18(11) 0(4)-Ni(2)-N(4) 94.24(11) 0(1)-Ni(1)-N(1) 95.08(11) 0(3)-Ni(2)-N(3) 94.90(11) 0(2)-Ni(1)-N(1) 175.87(13) 0(4)-Ni(2)-N(3) 178.35(12) N(2)-Ni(1)-N(1) 86.75(12) N(4)-Ni(2)-N(3) 86.86(12) Symmetry codes: ⅰ -x+1, -y, -z for 1; ⅱ -x, 1-y, -z; ⅲ x, -y, 1-z for 2. CCDC: 1892682, 1; 1855958, 2.
2. Results and discussion
2.1 Structure description
The identity of 1 and 2 were elucidated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, elemental analysis results of were fully consistent with the crystallographic formulation. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction reveals that complex 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic P21/c (No.14) space group, which unit cell contains one crystallography independent Ni(Ⅱ) forming two racemic neutral monomers [Ni((+)-3, 5-Cl-salcy)] and [Ni((-)-3, 5-Cl-salcy)]. As shown in Fig. 1, the central Ni(Ⅱ) exhibits tetra-coordinated environment which is defined by [N2O2] in the equatorial plane from Schiff-base ligand. The bond lengths of Ni-O(N) are in a range of 0.183 7(3)~0.185 5(4) nm, and bond angles of O(N)-Ni-O vary from 84.23(15)° to 178.38(16)°, which are favorably comparable with the corresponding values observed in salen-type Ni(Ⅱ) analogous[24-25].
Figure 1
The dihedral angle calculated between the planes of two benzene rings for 1 is 8.23(10)°, thus, the whole molecule exhibit coplanar configuration. Owing to the π-π interactions (the distances of Cg1ⅰ…Cg1 and Cg2ⅰ…Cg2 are equal to each other with centroid-to-centroid distance of 0.387 4(32) nm, Cg1: centroid of C1~C6 ring, Cg3:C15~C20 ring, Symmetry code: ⅰ 1-x, -y, -z), two neighboring molecules are further linked to each other to form a self-assembled supramolecular dimer (Fig. 1(b)), in which the Ni…Ni distance of ca. 0.331(26) nm (Fig. 2) is smaller than the sum of two nickel atoms′ van der Waals radius[26].
Figure 2
It is noteworthy that according to the analysis result of PLATON software[27], except π-π interactions, there is not any classical or unclassical hydrogen bond in the crystal structure. By comparison, Hirshfeld surface gives us qualitative and quantitative contributions of the interactions in the crystal packing. Detailed discussion is addressed in Hirshfeld surface analysis section.
Complex 2 crystallizes in the triclinic P1 (No.2) space group, and its asymmetric unit contains two identical, but crystallogaphically independent mononu-clear Ni(Ⅱ) unit. The Ni(Ⅱ) centers present same coor-dination environment with 1 by chelating with chloride salen-type ligand via [N2O2] in the equatorial plane. The bond lengths of Ni-O and Ni-N in the two Ni(Ⅱ) moieties are in a range of 0.183 7(2)~0.184 4(2) nm and 0.184 6(3)~0.185 5(3) nm, respectively. The bond angles around Ni(Ⅱ) centers have been found to be 84.02(10)° to 94.90(11)°, respectively (Fig. 3).
Figure 3
Intermolecular interaction analysis shows that the distance between Cg1ⅱ…Cg1 is equal to Cg2ⅱ…Cg2 (Symmetry code: ⅱ -x, 1-y, -z) and Cg3ⅲ…Cg3 is equal to Cg4ⅲ…Cg4 (Symmetry code: ⅲ x, -y, 1-z), with centroid-to-centroid distance being 0.419 6(2) and 0.382 2(2) nm, respectively, where Cg1, Cg2, Cg3 and Cg4 are the centroids of the C1~C6, C5~C20, C21~C26 and C35~C40, respectively. Beside these offset π-π stacking created by neighboring monomers, hydrogen bonds formed by phenolic oxygen atoms also play an important part in linking the neighboring racemic monomers to form self-assembled supramole-cular dimers (C8-H8…O1ⅲ: D…A 0.339 3(5) nm, D-H…A 145°). According to the analysis result of PLATON software[27], although there is no classic H-bond interactions in 2, C-H…Cl hydrogen bonds play a key role in stabilizing the crystal structure. As illustrated in Fig. 4, the adjacent monomers are connected by multiple C-H…Cl hydrogen bonds interactions to generate a two-dimensional layered structure. Detailed hydrogen-bond geometry information is summarized in Table 3.
Figure 4
Table 3
D-H …A d(D-H) / nm d(H …A) / nm d(D …A) / nm ∠DHA/(°) C(8)-H(8)…O(1) 0.098 0.254 0.339 3(5) 145 C(17)-H(17)…Cl(3) 0.093 0.276 0.342 9(4) 130 C(29)-H(29B)…Cl(2) 0.097 0.278 0.372 4(4) 163 C(32)-H(32B)…Cl(1) 0.097 0.283 0.358 7(4) 136 2.2 IR absorbance spectrum
The IR spectra of the complexes are very similar in the given region, and therefore, the spectrum of complex 1 is described here representatively. The IR spectrum (Fig. 5) showed a broad band centered in a range of 2 950~2 850 cm-1 and a strong peak at 1 447 cm-1 are assigned to ν(-CH2-) vibrations indicating the presence of -CH2- group of the cyclohexane unit. The strong peak at 1 632 cm-1 corresponds to the vibration of the C=N bonds. The characteristic peaks at 1 132 and 575 cm-1 are attributed to the vibrations of ν(Ni-O) and ν(Ni-O), respectively, and the peak at 729 cm-1 is attributed to the ν(C-Cl). These results are consistent with the structural analysis.
Figure 5
2.3 Hirshfeld surface analysis
The bundle of inter-related weak molecular interactions is difficult to be unraveled by traditional methods[28]. Hirshfeld surface analysis provides us a new perspective on the issue. This analysis method can provide detailed explanation about the nearby environment of the molecules in a crystal, and the comparison between similar structures can give a more specific description of the difference[29]. Although hydrogen bond interaction formed by halogen is weak and cannot be easily find out by traditional methods, Hirshfeld surface in the 2D fingerprint plots show that, for complex 1, the Cl…H-C interaction (Fig. 6a) covers the highest proportion (42.5%) of the total plots, whereas the C…H-C (Fig. 6b) contacts only cover less than a third proportion of Cl…H-C interaction (14.0%). These results indicate that the halogen atoms in 1 play the most important part in stabilizing the solid stature.
Figure 6
As shown in Fig. 7, Cl…H/H…Cl bonding still appears to be a major contributor in the crystal packing of 2, and the proportion is significantly lower than that in 1, merely comprising 26.1% of the total Hirshfeld surfaces, whereas C…H/H…C close contacts contribution appear higher in the 2D fingerprint plot(19.8%). These results indicate that although the structure and composition of 2 is similar with 1, different substitution number of chlorine atoms may result in an entirely different intermolecular interactions in solid structures.
Figure 7
3. Conclusions
In summary, two new salen-type halogenated Schiff-base Ni(Ⅱ) complexes have been synthesized by conventional method. The structures of the complexes were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffractions. A detailed comparison of Hirshfeld surface analysis result indicate that although the interaction formed by halogen atom is weak, halogen atoms can play an important role in supramolecular interaction. As different supramolecular interaction can lead a totally different physicochemical properties, further work will continue focus on the synthesis of halogenate ligands constructed complexes to systematically explore the regulating effect of halogen atoms.
Acknowledgement: This work was supported by Fund for Less Developed Regions of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.31760257); Joint Research Projects of Yunnan province of Local of institutions (partial) of higher education (Grant No.2017FH001-002); Agricultural plastic film and products research and development of Plateau area (Grant No.2016DH006); The Kunming University Chemistry & Chemical engineering students′ science and technology innovation project (Grant No.HXHG1808).
-
-
[1]
Huang F H, Anslyn E V. Chem. Rev., 2015, 115:6999-7000 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00352
-
[2]
Slater A G, Perdigo L M A, Beton P H, et al. Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47:3417-3427 doi: 10.1021/ar5001378
-
[3]
Stupp S I, Palmer L C. Chem. Mater., 2014, 26:507-518 doi: 10.1021/cm403028b
-
[4]
李志军, 张静, 魏学红, 等.无机化学学报, 2018, 34:353-358 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2018.050LI Zhi-Jun, ZHANG Jing, WEI Xue-Hong, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2018, 34:353-358 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2018.050
-
[5]
Aakery C B, Beatty A M, Helfrich B A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2010, 40:3240-3242 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227586644_Total_Synthesis_Supramolecular_Style_Design_and_Hydrogen-Bond-Directed_Assembly_of_Ternary_Supermolecules
-
[6]
Guillerm V, Kim D, Eubank J F, et al. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43:6141-6172 doi: 10.1039/C4CS00135D
-
[7]
Perry J J, Perman J A, Zaworotko M J. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38:1400-1417 doi: 10.1039/b807086p
-
[8]
Iyer R S, Rowland F S. Chem. Phys. Lett., 1973, 21:346-348 doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(73)80153-8
-
[9]
Wernsdorfer W, Aliagaalcalde N, Hendrickson D N, et al. Nature, 2002, 416:406-409 doi: 10.1038/416406a
-
[10]
Lecren L, Wernsdorfer W, Li Y G, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129:5045-5051 doi: 10.1021/ja067744i
-
[11]
Saha B K, Jetti R K R, Reddy L S, et al. Cryst. Growth Des., 2005, 5:887-899 doi: 10.1021/cg049691r
-
[12]
Bertani R, Sgarbossa P, Venzo A, et al. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2010, 254:677-695 doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.09.035
-
[13]
Ma C, Tian G, Zhang R. J. Organomet. Chem., 2006, 691:2014-2022 doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2005.12.054
-
[14]
Mad'Arová M, Sivák M, Kuchta L, et al. Dalton Trans., 2004:3313-3320 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15483716/
-
[15]
Xie Y S, Jia N, Zheng F K, et al. Cryst. Growth Des., 2009, 9:118-126 doi: 10.1021/cg7012073
-
[16]
Hazari A, Gómez-García C J, Drew M G B, et al. Polyhedron, 2017, 138:145-153 doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2017.09.012
-
[17]
Wu Q, Pu Q, Wu Y M, et al. J. Coord. Chem., 2015, 68:1010-1020 doi: 10.1080/00958972.2015.1006211
-
[18]
Miyasaka H, Saitoh A, Abe S. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2007, 251:2622-2664 doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.07.028
-
[19]
董文魁, 吕忠武, 孙银霞, 等.无机化学学报, 2009, 25:1627-1634 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4861.2009.09.020DONG Wen-Kui, LÜ Zhong-Wu, Sun Yin-Xia, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2009, 25:1627-1634 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4861.2009.09.020
-
[20]
游伟, 姚成, 黄伟.无机化学学报, 2010, 26:867-874 http://www.wjhxxb.cn/wjhxxbcn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20100522YOU Wei, YAO Cheng, HUANG Wei. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2010, 26:867-874 http://www.wjhxxb.cn/wjhxxbcn/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20100522
-
[21]
CrysAlisPro Software System, Ver.1.171.38.41, Agilent Technologies UK Ltd, Oxford, UK, 2015.
-
[22]
CrysAlisPro, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England, 2006.
-
[23]
Dolomanov O V, Bourhis L J, Gildea R J, et al. J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2010, 42:339-341 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228660392_OLEX2_A_complete_structure_solution_refinement_and_analysis_program
-
[24]
Houjou H, Hoga Y, Ma Y L, et al. Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2017, 461:27-34 doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2017.01.031
-
[25]
Guo T L, Gou Y, Guo M X, et al. Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Chem., 2015, 45:327-332 doi: 10.1080/15533174.2013.831893
-
[26]
Batsanov S S. Inorg. Mater., 2001, 37:871-885 doi: 10.1023/A:1011625728803
-
[27]
Spek A L. J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2003, 36:7-13 doi: 10.1107/S0021889802022112
-
[28]
Spackman M A, Jayatilaka D. CrystEngComm, 2009, 11:19-32 doi: 10.1039/B818330A
-
[29]
McKinnon J J, Jayatilaka D, Spackman M A. Chem. Commun., 2007:3814-3816 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18217656
-
[1]
-
Table 1. Crystallographic data and structure refinement for complexes 1 and 2
Complex 1 2 Formula C20H16Cl4N2Ni02 C20H18Cl2N2Ni02 Formula weight 516.84 447.95 Crystal system Monoclinic Triclinic Crystal size / mm 0.20×0.18×0.16 0.18×0.14×0.12 Space group P21/c P1 a / nm 1.352 06(14) 1.174 51(8) b/ nm 1.377 74(10) 1.287 43(8) c / nm 1.247 79(13) 1.356 64(8) α/(°) 86.447(5) β/(°) 117.130(13) 69.997(6) γ/(°) 76.885(6) Volume / nm3 2.068 6(3) 1.877 1(2) Dc/ (g·cm-3) 1.66 1.585 Z 4 1 μ / mm-1 1.475 1.336 Reflection collected, unique (Rint) 8 941, 3 518 (0.029 0) 13 206, 6 592 (0.066 6) Reflection with I > 2σ(I) 1 847 2 695 θ range for data collection / (°) 3.27~25.00 3.34~25.00 Data, restraint, parameter 3 518, 0, 262 6 592, 0, 487 Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.047 0.945 R indices [I > 2σ(I)]a, b R1=0.034 7, wR2=0.072 1 R1=0.058 6, wR2=0.061 0 R indices (all data) R1=0.050 4, wR2=0.080 8 R1=0.129 0, wR2=0.077 1 (Δρ)max, (Δρ)min/ (e·nm-3) 393, -276 409, -438 a R1=||Fo|-|Fc||/|Fo|; b wR2=[w(Fo2-Fc2)2]/[w(Fo2)2]1/2. Table 2. Selected bond lengths (nm) and angles for complexes 1 and 2
1 Ni(1)-O(2) 0.184 57(18) Ni(1)-0(1) 0.185 32(19) Ni(1)-N(2) 0.185 1(2) Ni(1)-N(1) 0.185 3(2) Ni(1)-Ni(1)ⅰ 0.331 56(7) Cl(1)-C(4) 0.174 0(3) Cl(3)-C(2) 0.173 4(3) Cl(2)-C(17) 0.174 5(3) Cl(4)-C(19) 0.173 3(3) 0(2)-Ni(1)-N(2) 93.93(9) 0(2)-Ni(1)-N(1) 179.74(10) 0(2)-Ni(1)-0(1) 85.61(8) N(2)-Ni(1)-N(1) 85.81(10) N(2)-Ni(1)-0(1) 178.60(9) 0(1)-Ni(1)-N(1) 94.64(9) C(3)-C(2)-Cl(3) 118.6(2) C(5)-C(4)-Cl(1) 119.8(3) C(1)-C(2)-Cl(3) 118.5(2) C(3)-C(4)-Cl(1) 119.5(3) 2 Ni(1)-0(1) 0.183 8(2) Ni(2)-0(3) 0.183 7(2) Ni(1)-0(2) 0.184 4(2) Ni(2)-0(4) 0.184 4(2) Ni(1)-N(2) 0.184 7(3) Ni(2)-N(4) 0.184 6(3) Ni(1)-N(1) 0.185 5(3) Ni(2)-N(3) 0.185 4(3) Ni(1)-Ni(1)ⅱ 0.352 97(2) Ni(2)_Ni(2)ⅲ 0.338 07(10) Cl(1)-C(2) 0.174 0(4) Cl(3)-C(22) 0.174 3(3) Cl(2)-C(19) 0.174 1(4) Cl(4)-C(39) 0.173 4(3) 0(1)-Ni(1)-0(2) 84.26(10) 0(3)-Ni(2)-0(4) 84.02(10) 0(1)-Ni(1)-N(2) 175.91(12) 0(3)-Ni(2)-N(4) 178.18(12) 0(2)-Ni(1)-N(2) 94.18(11) 0(4)-Ni(2)-N(4) 94.24(11) 0(1)-Ni(1)-N(1) 95.08(11) 0(3)-Ni(2)-N(3) 94.90(11) 0(2)-Ni(1)-N(1) 175.87(13) 0(4)-Ni(2)-N(3) 178.35(12) N(2)-Ni(1)-N(1) 86.75(12) N(4)-Ni(2)-N(3) 86.86(12) Symmetry codes: ⅰ -x+1, -y, -z for 1; ⅱ -x, 1-y, -z; ⅲ x, -y, 1-z for 2. Table 3. PLATON analysis result of hydrogen bond parameters for complex 2
D-H …A d(D-H) / nm d(H …A) / nm d(D …A) / nm ∠DHA/(°) C(8)-H(8)…O(1) 0.098 0.254 0.339 3(5) 145 C(17)-H(17)…Cl(3) 0.093 0.276 0.342 9(4) 130 C(29)-H(29B)…Cl(2) 0.097 0.278 0.372 4(4) 163 C(32)-H(32B)…Cl(1) 0.097 0.283 0.358 7(4) 136 -

计量
- PDF下载量: 5
- 文章访问数: 1037
- HTML全文浏览量: 130