English

• Over the last decades, hexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indoles (HPIs)/tetrahydrofuroindolines (TFIs), as representative indoline alkaloids, possessing the fused pentacyclic skeleton have attracted significant attention from the synthetic community [1–11] due to their family of biologically active natural products displaying the remarkable structural diversity (e.g., acetylardeemin, psychotriasine, WIN 64821, WIN 64745, chimonanthine, physovenine, madindoline A, etc.) [12–20] and encompassing clinically important pharmaceutical molecules (physostigmine is clinically utilized for the treatment of myasthenia gravis, glaucoma, and Alzheimer's disease) (Fig, 1) [21,22]. Furthermore, 3a-bromo-substituted pyrroloindolines/furoindolines are significant and versatile building blocks to readily access a library of HPI and TFI alkaloids, in which the C–Br bond can be facilely transformed to a new C–C, C–N or C–O bond via a substitution process with retention of configuration [23–46]. The cyclization reaction is regarded as one of the most practical methods to produce structural diverse N-heterocycle derivates [47–53], therefore bromocyclization is an attractive way to construct 3a-bromo substituted pyrroloindinolines/furolinolines. As a result, tremendous efforts have been devoted to the construction of these scaffolds in the past decades (Scheme 1A). Among them, the classical approach has utilized excessive amount of the highly sensitive and active bromine to construct these frameworks [27–29]. Moreover, many remarkable methodologies have employed stoichiometric electrophilic bromo reagents (PyHBr₃ [30], NBS [31–42], DBDMH [43], NBAc [44], and DABCO-derived bromine salts [45]) to approach both chiral and achiral derivatives, while the organic waste would be produced (Scheme 1A, Path Ⅰ). In addition, the in-situ generated electrophilic bromide assisted by the combination of bromo salts and extra oxidants would be successfully involved to the efficient bromocyclization (Scheme 1A, Path Ⅱ) [54–57]. In this matter, Tong and co-workers have developed an oxone-mediated procedure, in which the organic waste could be eliminated, while the formation of less environmentally polluting salt (K₂SO₄) is inevitable [48]. Recently, the electrochemical bromocyclization has been well-off for the establishment of 3a-bromopyrroloindolines and 3a-bromofuranoindolines along with the production of stoichiometric inorganic residues [58,59]. Though numerous methods have been applied to fabricate these units in high-efficiency, the development of more concise and efficient, greener, and milder methodologies to achieve these exquisite entities remains highly desired and sought-after [60,61].

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  Significant indole alkaloids bearing an HPI or TFI core.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Scheme 1

  

  Scheme 1.  From inspiration to access economic and green bromocyclization of tryptamine/tryptophol scaffolds.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Hydrobromic acid (HBr) is the readily available and least expensive bromine source (Scheme 1B), which serves as a potential electrophilic bromine reagent [62–64]. Theoretically, HBr can be oxidized to Br₂ [E⁰(Br₂/Br⁻) = +1.07 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode (SHE)] under the oxygen atmosphere [E⁰(O₂/H₂O) = +1.23 V vs. SHE] along with water as the single by-product (Scheme 1C, Left) [65], however, a relatively slow reaction rate is displayed due to an activation barrier of 14 kJ/mol [66]. Therefore, enhancement of the reaction rate would achieve a concise, efficient, and green route to access bromocyclization. The key to success of the protocol lies in employment of a matching medium to bridge the gap between O₂ activation and HBr reoxidation. Naturally, there are numerous nitrogen oxides and related salts possessing oxidability and the potential to be an activator [67–74]. Notably, the facilely available nitrite salt, such as NaNO₂ and KNO₂, possesses the unique redox feature that can release nitric oxide (NO) under acidic conditions [69–74]. Mechanistically, the in situ-generated NO can be oxidized by O₂ to access nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), which re-oxidizes HBr to Br₂ with a controllable manner. In addition, HNO₃ formed by dissolving NO₂ in water can oxidize HBr to Br₂ as well. Therefore, the nitrite-catalyzed oxidation can achieve an appropriate rate to release Br₂, resulting in the mild brominating reaction. In the whole process, the major by-product is water (Scheme 1C, right).

  Herein, we have developed a nitrite-catalyzed economic, sustainable and scalable bromocyclization of tryptamine/tryptophol derivates to successfully approach the valuable HPI/TFI scaffolds under both bath and flow conditions with high efficiency, in which water is generated as the byproduct (Scheme 1D). Notably, an aerobic bromocyclization and subsequent aromatic bromination cascade transformations have also been facilely established to access dibrominated HPIs and TFIs. These unique analogues could be smoothly applied to achieve total synthesis of pharmaceuticals and natural products.

  We started our optimization with the bromocyclization of tryptamine 1a to give 3-bromohexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole 3a in the presence of HBr (48 wt% in H₂O) as bromine source, NaNO₂ as catalyst, O₂ as oxidant, and dichloromethane as solvent. To our delight, the product 2a could be obtained in yield of 23% at room temperature (Table 1, entry 1). Solvents were subsequently examined, and ethyl acetate was the optimized solvent leading to access the desired product in 90% yield (Table 1, entries 1-6). Notably, the nitrite salt screening process demonstrated that KNO₂ was the best promoter to achieve the highest reactivity and obtain the desired entity 2a in 93% yield (Table 1, entry 7). Moreover, the efficiency of this transformation was insusceptible under air atmosphere (Table 1, entry 8). The catalyst loading screening was shown that decreasing the equivalent amount of KNO₂ to 5 mol% would decrease the yield of the product 2a to 85% (Table 1, entry 9). The controlled experiments were then carried out and proved that nitrite salt and O₂ were essential (Table 1, entries 10 and 11). When the solution of HBr in acetic acid was instead of aqueous HBr as bromine source, the desired product 2a was obtained in trace amount (Table 1, entry 12). It might be that water can serve as both the reagent and cosolvent for nitrite salt.

  Table 1

  

  Table 1.  Optimization of reaction conditions.^a

  DownLoad: CSV

  With the optimized conditions in hand, we examined the scope of this KNO₂-catalyzed economic and green bromocyclization (Scheme 2). A range of tryptamine derivatives bearing carbamate, acyl, or sulfonyl protecting groups on both nitrogen atoms were smoothly employed to the transformation, leading to access the corresponding HPIs (2a–2k) in excellent yields (80%–94%). Next, 2-methyl or phenyl substituted tryptamines were excellent substrates for the bromocyclization to obtain the desired products (2l–2n) in high efficiencies. The indole rings substituted with alkyl, halogeno, and alkoxy on the 4-, 5-, 6-, or 7-position could be successfully and efficiently transformed to the counterparts (2o-2w). Moreover, 7-benzyloxy substituted scaffold could simultaneously underwent an electrophilic bromination and a bromocyclization cascade, resulting in generation of the desired HPI 2x in 53% yield. Significantly, the tryptophan derivatives were well tolerant of this transformation, in which the related products 2y-2z could be formed in high yields with excellent diastereoselectivities (dr = 12:1). This process exhibited the highly potential application to access optically pure nature products and pharmaceuticals. To further expand the substrate scope, we subsequently utilized tryptophol analogues in the oxidative bromocyclization and found that they also possessed high compatibilities to afford TFIs 2aa–2ai in high yields under oxygen atmosphere. Inspired by the formation of dibromosubstituted product 2x, we next explored and achieved the cascade reaction of bromocyclization and aromatic bromination (For details, please see the P12 of Supporting information). A series of tryptamine derivatives containing substituents of carbamate, acyl, or sulfonyl on both nitrogen atoms were well compatible with the procedure, leading to access the related dibromosubstituted HPIs (3a–3f) in good yields. Moreover, the dibromosubstituted TFIs (2ag, 3g-3k) could be facilely obtained in this process.

  Scheme 2

  

  Scheme 2.  Substrate scope for controllable bromocyclization of tryptamine and tryptophol derivatives. ^a Standard conditions A: 1 (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv.), aq. HBr (0.24 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), and KNO₂ (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%) were stirred in EtOAc (2 mL) at r.t. for 3 h under air atmosphere. ^b Isolated yields. ^c The dr value was determined by ¹H NMR analysis. ^d NaNO₂ (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%) was instead of KNO₂ (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%). ^e Standard conditions B: 1 (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv.), aq. HBr (0.24 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), and NaNO₂ (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%) were stirred in MeCN (2 mL) at r.t. for 8 h under O₂ atmosphere. ^f KNO₂ (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%) was instead of NaNO₂ (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%). ^g Standard conditions C: 1 (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv.), aq. HBr (0.72 mmol, 3.6 equiv.), and KNO₂ (0.04 mmol, 20 mol%) were stirred in MeCN (2 mL) at r.t. for 10-15 h under O₂ atmosphere. ^h NaNO₂ (0.04 mmol, 20 mol%) was instead of KNO₂ (0.04 mmol, 20 mol%).

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To further evaluate the potential environmental impact of our developed nitrite-catalyzed transformation with the most efficient or green method, we analyzed four major green chemistry metrics: E-factor [75,76], atom economy (AE) [77], reaction mass efficiency (RME) [78] and process mass intensity (PMI) (For details, please see the PS29 of Supporting information) [79]. A lower value of E-factor (ideal: 0.00) [75,76] and PMI (ideal: 1.00) [79] demonstrates that less waste is formed or less total mass of substrates is required per mass of the related product, while a higher value of AE (ideal: 100%) [77] and RME (ideal: 100%) [78] means better resource and atom efficiency. The compound 2b as a representative example was chose to calculate these metrics (Fig. 2a). The E-factor was 0.54 for the NBS-involved bromocyclization [34], 0.49 for the MgBr₂-promoted electrochemical bromocyclization process [51], 1.85 for the oxone-mediated system [48], and 0.22 for our system, which indicated our reaction system generated the lowest waste. Similarly, the PMI values (NBS: 1.54, MgBr₂: 1.49, Oxone: 2.85, KNO₂/HBr: 1.22) suggested a highest mass reduction of materials for our developed method in the bromocyclization reaction system. Moreover, the values of AE (96%) and RME (84%) were highest in these transformations demonstrated our new protocol was the best efficient among all the procedures. Notably, 96% AE value of our nitrite-catalyzed strategy was almost approaching the ideal green chemistry. The value of these four green chemistry metrics was tabulated in Fig. 2a, which clearly indicated our developed process was both an efficient and environmental-friendly transformation that approached the ideality of green chemistry (Fig. 2b). Additionally, the generated waste of the NBS system was the toxic organic byproduct, while the waste formed from the oxone–KBr procedure was non-hazardous inorganic salt. Therefore, the MgBr system was the second but far greener than the oxone–KBr, and NBS protocols.

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  Green chemistry metrics analysis for bromocyclization of tryptamine 2b.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To demonstrate the practicability of our established method, the concise gram-scale operation and further transformation were smoothly performed (Scheme 3). Firstly, 1.14 g of HPI compound 2a (86% yield) could be successfully obtained under standard conditions A; meanwhile, TFI 2ab was also formed in 75% yield under standard conditions B. Furthermore, the gram-scale operation of bromocyclization and subsequent aromatic bromination cascade reaction occurred for the formation of the dibromo-substituted derivative 3a (1.82 g) in 75% yield. Notably, the solvolytic substitution of bromine with acetate afforded 4a in 81% yield upon heating a solution of 3a in AcOH at reflux with the assistance of AgOAc [80].

  Scheme 3

  

  Scheme 3.  The gram-scale operation and further transformation.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The recently emerging continuous flow technology features higher safety and efficiency, accurate control, better heat and mass transfer, easier amplification and better sustainability [81–90]. Thus, we also explored the application of this protocol under continuous flow conditions: water was used as the cosolvent to promise a good solubility of KNO₂, by contrast with 8-h reaction time in batch, better mixing efficiency in microreactor led to the full conversion in 26 min, delivering the desired product in 80% yield (Scheme 4; for details, please see the PS32 of Supporting information). This result implied that this economic and sustainable bromocyclization could be a powerful tool for the synthesis of valuable HPI/TFI building block for organic synthesis and drug discovery.

  Scheme 4

  

  Scheme 4.  Gram-scale synthesis of 2f under continuous flow conditions.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To further highlight the utility of our new green strategy for the oxidative bromocyclization, we commenced the formal total synthesis of some representative pharmaceuticals and natural products of (-)-physostigmine, (-)-psychotriasine, WIN 64821 and WIN 64745, respectively (Scheme 5). Our synthetic procedure to access (-)-physostigmine began with the N-Boc protections of the commercially available l-tryptophan methyl ester 5 to obtain 1y. The oxidative bromocyclization of 1y utilizing our new developed protocol leaded to approach the tricyclic HPI 2y (1.19 g) in 80% yield with high diastereoselectivity (12:1 dr). In this process, a 12:1 mixture of diastereomers were facilely isolated by column chromatography. A cyclopropylazetoindoline formation proceeded smoothly to give the structure 6 in the presence of KO^tBu, followed by a strain release process to access 7 by using AlMe₃ as nucleophile. The formation of 7 intercepted an intermediate used in the construction of (-)-physostigmine [24]. The synthetic route of (-)-psychotriasine was also investigated through our approach, in which l-tryptophan methyl ester 5 was subjected to N-protection processes and transformed to the product 8. Our new established gram-scale bromocyclization was then occurred to generate substituted HPI 2aj in 76% yield with good diastereoselectivity (8.5:1 dr), followed by a substitution reaction to obtain the key intermediate 10 by using 9 as nucleophile. The interception of 10 was utilized to synthesize (-)-psychotriasine [91,92]. Furthermore, d-tryptophan methyl ester 5' was also employed to obtain the highly diastereoselective bromo-substituted HPI 2y'-1 followed by a reductive dimerization mediated by Ni-catalysis to afford the key dimeric hexahydropyrrolo[2,3-b]indole 11 that could be applied to synthesize WIN 64821 and WIN 64754 [32].

  Scheme 5

  

  Scheme 5.  Formal total syntheses of pharmaceuticals and natural products.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  A plausible mechanism is depicted in Scheme 6. Initially, NO₂⁻ can be transformed to NO under acidic conditions. The oxidation of in situ-generated NO using O₂ can smoothly access NO₂, which re-oxidizes HBr to Br₂ with a controllable manner. Meanwhile, HNO₃ generated by dissolving NO₂ in water can also promote the oxidation of HBr to Br₂. Subsequently, the 3a-bromo-substituted pyrroloindoline/furoindoline 1 can react with the in situ-released Br₂ to obtain the recycled HBr and a bromonium ion intermediate TS-1, leading to successful access the product 2. Furthermore, the dibromosubstituted product 3 can be generated undergoing an electrophilic substitution of Br₂ to 2, in which intermediate TS-2 can be formed.

  Scheme 6

  

  Scheme 6.  Proposed mechanism.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In conclusion, we have realized a highly efficient and concise bromocyclization of tryptamine/tryptophol derivates to access the valuable HPI/TFI scaffolds with economic, sustainable and scalable manners under both bath and flow conditions. Furthermore, a cascade transformation of bromocyclization and aromatic bromination was also successfully achieved to form dibrominated HPIs and TFIs. The gram-scale operation and further transformation were smoothly performed to access the significant scaffold. Notably, the efficiency and utility of this new protocol were also demonstrated by the formal total synthesis of cyclotryptamine alkaloids, such as (-)-psychotriasine, WIN 64821 and WIN 64745, and anticholinesterase agent (-)-physostigmine. The most striking feature of our protocol over all previous methods is that water generated from the reaction is the major waste. Further studies on development of more sustainable and economic transformations are ongoing and will be reported in due course.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  Acknowledgments

  This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22208302), and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China (Nos. LQ21B020006, ZJ2022039).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109280.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     J. Kim, M. Movassaghi, Acc. Chem. Res. 48 (2015) 1159 –1064. doi: 10.1021/ar500454v

  2. [2]

     G.J. Mei, W.L. Koay, C.X.A. Tan, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 (2021) 5985–6012. doi: 10.1039/d0cs00530d

  3. [3]

     R.H. Snell, R.L. Woodward, M.C. Willis, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50 (2011) 9116–9119. doi: 10.1002/anie.201103864

  4. [4]

     H. Wang, S.E. Reisman, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 (2014) 6206–6210. doi: 10.1002/anie.201402571

  5. [5]

     Q. Li, T. Xia, L. Yao, et al., Chem. Sci. 6 (2015) 3599–3605. doi: 10.1039/C5SC00338E

  6. [6]

     Z.X. Zhang, S.C. Chen, L. Jiao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 8090–8094. doi: 10.1002/anie.201602771

  7. [7]

     C. Liu, J.C. Yi, Z.B. Zheng, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 751–754. doi: 10.1002/anie.201508570

  8. [8]

     S.Z. Jiang, X.Y. Zeng, X. Liang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 4044–4048. doi: 10.1002/anie.201511549

  9. [9]

     Y. Li, S. Zhu, J. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 3982–3985. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b00764

  10. [10]

      X. Zhang, B.N. Kakde, R. Guo, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 6053–6058. doi: 10.1002/anie.201901086

  11. [11]

      P. Zou, H. Yang, J. Wei, et al., Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 6836–6840. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c02393

  12. [12]

      U. Anthoni, C. Christophersen, P.H. Nielsen, Naturally Occurring Cyclotryptophans and Cyclotryptamines, in: S.W. Pelletier (Ed. ), Alkaloids: Chemical and Biological Perspectives, Pergamon, Oxford, 1999, pp. 163-236.

  13. [13]

      M. Hayashi, Y.P. Kim, S. Takamatsu, et al., J. Antibiot. 49 (1996) 1091–1095. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.49.1091

  14. [14]

      G. Subramaniam, O. Hiraku, M. Hayashi, T. Koyano, et al., J. Nat. Prod. 70 (2007) 1783–1789. doi: 10.1021/np0703747

  15. [15]

      G. Subramaniam, T.S. Kam, Helv. Chim. Acta 91 (2008) 930–937. doi: 10.1002/hlca.200890098

  16. [16]

      W.L. Chan, X. Tang, F. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 6260–6626. doi: 10.1002/anie.201900758

  17. [17]

      G. -J. Mei, X. Tang, Y. Tasdan, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 648–652. doi: 10.1002/anie.201911686

  18. [18]

      L. Bai, Y. Ma, X. Jiang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 20609–20615. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c10498

  19. [19]

      M. Xu, M. You, Y. Su, et al., Org. Chem. Front. 10 (2023) 1521–1526. doi: 10.1039/d2qo01966c

  20. [20]

      L. Bai, J. Li, X. Jiang, Chem 9 (2023) 483–496. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2022.10.021

  21. [21]

      A. Brossi, J. Med. Chem. 33 (1990) 2311–2319. doi: 10.1021/jm00171a001

  22. [22]

      Q.S. Yu, H.W. Holloway, T. Utsuki, et al., J. Med. Chem. 42 (1999) 1855–1861. doi: 10.1021/jm980459s

  23. [23]

      M. Bruncko, D. Crich, R. Samy, J. Org. Chem. 59 (1994) 5543–5549. doi: 10.1021/jo00098a011

  24. [24]

      V.R. Espejo, X.B. Li, J.D. Rainier, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (2010) 8282–8284. doi: 10.1021/ja103428y

  25. [25]

      S.P. Lathrop, M. Pompeo, W.T.T. Chang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 7763–7769. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04072

  26. [26]

      P. Lindovska, M. Movassaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 17590–17596. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b09929

  27. [27]

      M. Movassaghi, M.A. Schmidt, J.A. Ashenhurst, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47 (2008) 1485–1487. doi: 10.1002/anie.200704960

  28. [28]

      J. Kim, J.A. Ashenhurst, M. Movassaghi, Science 324 (2009) 238–241. doi: 10.1126/science.1170777

  29. [29]

      N. Boyer, M. Movassaghi, Chem. Sci. 3 (2012) 1798–1803. doi: 10.1039/c2sc20270k

  30. [30]

      J. Kim, M. Movassaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 14940–14943. doi: 10.1021/ja206743v

  31. [31]

      V.R. Espejo, J.D. Rainier, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 12894–12895. doi: 10.1021/ja8061908

  32. [32]

      C. Pérez-Balado, Á. R. de Lera, Org. Lett. 10 (2008) 3701–3704. doi: 10.1021/ol8013073

  33. [33]

      C. Silva-López, C. Pérez-Valado, C. Rodríguez-Grana, et al., Org. Lett. 10 (2008) 77–80. doi: 10.1021/ol702732j

  34. [34]

      T. Newhouse, C.A. Lewis, K.J. Eastman, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (2010) 7119–7137. doi: 10.1021/ja1009458

  35. [35]

      V.R. Espejo, J.D. Rainier, Org. Lett. 12 (2010) 2154–2157. doi: 10.1021/ol100672z

  36. [36]

      L. Furst, J.M.R. Narayanam, C.R.J. Stephenson, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50 (2011) 9655–9659. doi: 10.1002/anie.201103145

  37. [37]

      Y. Wang, C. Kong, Y. Du, et al., Org. Biomol. Chem. 10 (2012) 2793–2797. doi: 10.1039/c2ob00014h

  38. [38]

      M. Wang, X. Feng, L. Cai, et al., Chem. Commun. 48 (2012) 4344–4346. doi: 10.1039/c2cc31025b

  39. [39]

      Y. Sun, R. Li, W. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52 (2013) 9201–9204. doi: 10.1002/anie.201303334

  40. [40]

      R.P. Loach, O.S. Fenton, M. Movassaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 1057–1064. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b12392

  41. [41]

      H. Lei, L. Wang, Z. Xu, T. Ye, Org. Lett. 19 (2017) 5134–5137. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02425

  42. [42]

      H. Hakamata, S. Sato, H. Ueda, et al., Org. Lett. 19 (2017) 5308–5311. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02602

  43. [43]

      M. Movassaghi, M.A. Schmidt, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 (2007) 3725–3728. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700705

  44. [44]

      Q. Cai, Q. Yin, S.L. You, Asian J. Org. Chem. 3 (2014) 408–411. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.201300146

  45. [45]

      W. Xie, G. Jiang, H. Liu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52 (2013) 12924–12927. doi: 10.1002/anie.201306774

  46. [46]

      X. Feng, G. Jiang, Z. Xia, et al., Org. Lett. 17 (2015) 4428–4431. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b02046

  47. [47]

      H.Y. Song, F. Xiao, J. Jiang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108509. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108509

  48. [48]

      Y.H. Lu, Z.T. Zhang, H.Y. Wu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108036. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108036

  49. [49]

      Y.H. Lu, C. Wu, J.C. Hou, et al., ACS Catal. 13 (2023) 13071–13076. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c02268

  50. [50]

      Y.H. Lu, S.Y. Mu, H.X. Li, et al., Green Chem. 25 (2023) 5539–5542. doi: 10.1039/d2gc04906f

  51. [51]

      K. l. Wang, J. Huang, W. Liu, et al., Chin. J. Org. Chem. 42 (2022) 2527–2534. doi: 10.6023/cjoc202203055

  52. [52]

      Q.W. Gui, F. Teng, Z.C. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 1907–1910. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.01.021

  53. [53]

      Q.S. Liu, Y.F. Lv, R.S. Liu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 136–139. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.059

  54. [54]

      D. Tu, L. Ma, X. Tong, et al., Org. Lett. 14 (2012) 4830–4833. doi: 10.1021/ol302158h

  55. [55]

      J. Xu, R. Tong, Green Chem 19 (2017) 2952–2956. doi: 10.1039/C7GC01341H

  56. [56]

      G. Zhao, E. Wang, R. Tong, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9 (2021) 6118–6125. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01709

  57. [57]

      L. Song, Y. Zhou, H. Liang, et al., J. Org. Chem. 88 (2023) 504–512. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c02496

  58. [58]

      J. Wu, H. Abou-Hamdan, R. Guillot, et al., Chem. Commun. 56 (2020) 1713–1716. doi: 10.1039/c9cc09276e

  59. [59]

      Y.A. Wu, R.A. Wang, S.Y. Jiang, et al., Green Chem. 24 (2022) 6720–6726. doi: 10.1039/d2gc02086f

  60. [60]

      Y. Kim, C. Li, Green Synth. Catal. 1 (2020) 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.gresc.2020.06.002

  61. [61]

      H.J. Zhou, Y.P. Yao, T.H. Zhang, Green Chem. 25 (2023), doi: 10.1039/D3GC02429F.

  62. [62]

      S. Song, X. Sun, X. Li, et al., Org. Lett. 17 (2015) 2886–2889. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00932

  63. [63]

      S. Song, X. Li, X. Sun, et al., Green Chem. 17 (2015) 3285–3289. doi: 10.1039/C5GC00528K

  64. [64]

      S. Song, X. Huang, Y.F. Liang, et al., Green Chem. 17 (2015) 2727–2731. doi: 10.1039/C5GC00184F

  65. [65]

      J. Rumble, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 103rd Ed., CRC Press, 2022.

  66. [66]

      K.G. McKendrick, D.J. Rakestraw, R. Zhang, et al., J. Phys. Chem. 92 (1988) 5530–5540. doi: 10.1021/j100330a039

  67. [67]

      J.S. Stamier, D.J. Singel, J. Loscalzo, Science 258 (1992) 1898–1902. doi: 10.1126/science.1281928

  68. [68]

      P.G. Wang, M. Xian, X. Tang, et al., Chem. Rev. 102 (2002) 1091–1134. doi: 10.1021/cr000040l

  69. [69]

      R. Liu, X. Liang, C. Dong, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 4112–4113. doi: 10.1021/ja031765k

  70. [70]

      A. Podgoršek, M. Zupan, J. Iskra, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (2009) 8424–8450. doi: 10.1002/anie.200901223

  71. [71]

      M. Podgoršek, J. Eissen, Fleckenstein, et al., Green Chem. 11 (2009) 120–126. doi: 10.1039/B814989E

  72. [72]

      M. Uyanik, R. Fukatsu, K. Ishihara, Chem. Asian J. 5 (2010) 456–460. doi: 10.1002/asia.200900609

  73. [73]

      K. Moriyama, T. Hamada, Y. Nakamuraa, et al., Chem. Commun. 53 (2017) 6565–6568. doi: 10.1039/C7CC02166F

  74. [74]

      K. Watanabe, T. Hamada, K. Moriyama, Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 5803–5807. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b02488

  75. [75]

      R.A. Sheldon, Green Chem. 9 (2007) 1273–1283. doi: 10.1039/b713736m

  76. [76]

      R.A. Sheldon, Chem. Commun. 44 (2008) 3352–3365. doi: 10.1039/b803584a

  77. [77]

      B.M. Trost, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 34 (1995) 259–281. doi: 10.1002/anie.199502591

  78. [78]

      D.J.C. Constable, A.D. Curzons, V.L. Cunningham, Green Chem. 4 (2002) 521–527. doi: 10.1039/B206169B

  79. [79]

      C.S. Ponder Jimenez-Gonzalez, Q.B. Broxterman, et al., Org. Process Res. Dev. 15 (2011) 912–917. doi: 10.1021/op200097d

  80. [80]

      M. Harmata, S. Wacharasindhu, Org. Lett. 7 (2005) 2563–2565. doi: 10.1021/ol050598l

  81. [81]

      Y. Wu, W.Q. Chen, Y.Q. Zhao, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 26 (2015) 334–338. doi: 10.5325/style.49.3.0334

  82. [82]

      G. Glotz, R. Lebl, D. Dallinger, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 13786 –137. doi: 10.1002/anie.201708533

  83. [83]

      A. Steiner, J.D. Williams, O. de Frutos, Green Chem. 22 (2020) 448–454. doi: 10.1039/c9gc03662h

  84. [84]

      Y. Xin, S. Peng, J.X. Chen, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 1448–1461. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.09.054

  85. [85]

      G. Laudadio, Y. Deng, K.V.D. Wal, et al., Science 369 (2020) 92–96. doi: 10.1126/science.abb4688

  86. [86]

      J.Y. Liao, S.L. Zhang, Z.S. Wang, et al., Green Synth. Catal. 1 (2020) 121–133. doi: 10.1016/j.gresc.2020.08.001

  87. [87]

      Z. Hu, M. Huang, Jiang, et al., ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 9 (2021) 8990–9000. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01419

  88. [88]

      J. Wang, J. Li, Y. Wang, et al., ACS Catal. 12 (2022) 9629–9637. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c02056

  89. [89]

      L. Wan, G. Kong, M. Liu, et al., Green Synth. Catal. 3 (2022) 243–258. doi: 10.1016/j.gresc.2022.07.007

  90. [90]

      J. Li, X. Song, Y. Wang, J. Huang, et al., Chem. Sci. 14 (2023) 4351–4356. doi: 10.1039/d3sc00127j

  91. [91]

      T. Horibe, S. Ohmura, K. Ishihara, Org. Lett. 19 (2017) 5525–5528. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02613

  92. [92]

      S. Gallego, P. Lorenzo, R. Alvarez, et al., Tetrahedron Lett. 58 (2017) 210–212. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.12.003

• 

  Figure 1  Significant indole alkaloids bearing an HPI or TFI core.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 1  From inspiration to access economic and green bromocyclization of tryptamine/tryptophol scaffolds.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 2  Substrate scope for controllable bromocyclization of tryptamine and tryptophol derivatives. ^a Standard conditions A: 1 (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv.), aq. HBr (0.24 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), and KNO₂ (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%) were stirred in EtOAc (2 mL) at r.t. for 3 h under air atmosphere. ^b Isolated yields. ^c The dr value was determined by ¹H NMR analysis. ^d NaNO₂ (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%) was instead of KNO₂ (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%). ^e Standard conditions B: 1 (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv.), aq. HBr (0.24 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), and NaNO₂ (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%) were stirred in MeCN (2 mL) at r.t. for 8 h under O₂ atmosphere. ^f KNO₂ (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%) was instead of NaNO₂ (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%). ^g Standard conditions C: 1 (0.2 mmol, 1 equiv.), aq. HBr (0.72 mmol, 3.6 equiv.), and KNO₂ (0.04 mmol, 20 mol%) were stirred in MeCN (2 mL) at r.t. for 10-15 h under O₂ atmosphere. ^h NaNO₂ (0.04 mmol, 20 mol%) was instead of KNO₂ (0.04 mmol, 20 mol%).

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  Green chemistry metrics analysis for bromocyclization of tryptamine 2b.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 3  The gram-scale operation and further transformation.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 4  Gram-scale synthesis of 2f under continuous flow conditions.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 5  Formal total syntheses of pharmaceuticals and natural products.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 6  Proposed mechanism.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Table 1.  Optimization of reaction conditions.^a

  下载: 导出CSV
•