注册 English

Synthesis and Magnetism of Cyano-Bridged Fe2Ni Double-Zigzag Chains

Yan-Li HE ,  Yin-Shan MENG ,  Hui-Ying SUN ,  Wen-Jing JIANG ,  Cheng-Qi JIAO ,  Tao LIU

downloadPDF
Citation:  HE Yan-Li, MENG Yin-Shan, SUN Hui-Ying, JIANG Wen-Jing, JIAO Cheng-Qi, LIU Tao. Synthesis and Magnetism of Cyano-Bridged Fe2Ni Double-Zigzag Chains[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2019, 35(9): 1570-1578. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2019.176 shu

氰基桥联的Fe2Ni双之字链的合成与磁性

  • .

    大连理工大学精细化工国家重点实验室, 大连 116024

    • 通讯作者: 刘涛, liutao@dlut.edu.cn
  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金 21871039

    国家自然科学基金 21801037

    国家自然科学基金（No.21871039，21801037）资助项目

摘要: 利用四氰基构筑单元和不同位阻的吡啶类配体，合成了3例氰基桥联的Fe2ⅢNiⅡ链状化合物。化合物{[Fe（bpy）（CN）4]2[Ni（bp）2]·2H2O}n（1）（bpy=2，2'-联吡啶；bp=4-苯基吡啶），{[Fe（bpy）（CN）4]2[Ni（papy）2]·H2O}n（2）（papy=4-（苯基氮烯）吡啶）和{[Fe（bpy）（CN）4]2[Ni（azp）]·4H2O}n（3）（azp=1，2-二（吡啶-4-基）二氮烯）均为双之字型的链状结构。磁性测试表明化合物1~3均表现为链内的铁磁相互作用。化合物1表现出单链磁体行为，有效能垒为10.9 K。

English

  • 0.   Introduction

    Single-chain magnets (SCMs), which can exhibit slow magnetic relaxation and magnetic hysteresis below blocking temperature, have attracted considerable attention and great interests because of their potential application in high-density information storage and spintronic devices[1-8]. This conception was firstly proposed by Glauber in 1960s that Ising magnetic chain was expected to exhibits low magnetic relaxation behavior[9]. However, it was not until 2001 Gatteschi and co-workers reported the first single-chain magnet [Co(hfac)2(NITPHOMe)][10]. In recent decades, consid-erable SCMs with chirality, porosity, spin-crossover, photo-switchable properties have been reported[10-16]. In order to obtain high-performance SCMs, two challenges have to be solved: (1) constructing magnetic chains with strong intrachain ferromagnetic interactions so as to meet the Ising chain requirement; (2) minimizing the interchain interaction to avoid the long-range magnetic ordering. Utilizing metallocyanate building blocks as multidentate ligands is an effective approach for constructing SCMs for that it is helpful to form the one-dimensional structure and transmit the intrachain magnetic interactions[14, 17-19]. Particularly, tetracyano-metallate building block facilitates the construction of one-dimensional chain structure, wherein two of the four cyano groups can coordinate with appropriate metal ions to form a double-zigzag chain, and the other two cyano groups can form hydrogen bonding interactions with solvent molecules. The recent study have also dedicated the important role of tetracyanometallate building blocks in the construction of photo-switchable single-chain magnets[20-21].

    In order to obtain the SCMs, we plan to use tetracyanometallate building block to link spin carriers such as Co2+, Ni2+, Mn3+ and Fe2+ into a ferromagnetic chain. The interchain magnetic interaction should be minimized to avoid the long-range ordering. Therefore, suitable diamagnetic auxiliary ligands should be carefully selected to make chains magnetically well-isolated and ensure the uniaxial anisotropy of the transition metal ions[11, 13, 22-25]. In this work, we selected Li[Fe(Ⅲ)(bpy)(CN)4] (bpy=2, 2′-bipyridine) as the building block to react with Ni(Ⅱ) ions. The Ni(Ⅱ) ion was chosen because the interactions between low-spin Fe(Ⅲ) and high-spin Ni(Ⅱ) are generally ferromagnetic. Three auxiliary ligands 4-phenylpyridine (bp), 4-(phenyldiazenyl)pyridine (papy), and 1, 2-di(pyridin-4-yl)diazene (azp) were applied, forming three cyano-bridged Fe2ⅢNiⅡ double-zigzag chain complexes: {[Fe(bpy)(CN)4]2[Ni(bp)2]·2H2O}n (1), {[Fe(bpy)(CN)4]2[Ni(papy)2]·H2O}n (2) and {[Fe(bpy)(CN)4]2[Ni(azp)]·4H2O}n (3). Herein, we reported the synthesis, crystal structures and magnetic properties of compounds 1~3.

    1.   Experimental

    1.1   Materials and methods

    All organic reagents were commercially obtained and used without further purification. Li[Fe(bpy)(CN)4] and the ancillary ligands L (L=bp, papy and azp) were synthesized according to the literature methods[26]. Elemental analyses (C, H and N) were performed on an ElementarVario EL Ⅲ analyzer. Magnetic measure-ments of the samples were performed on a Quantum Design SQUID (MPMS XL-7) magnetometer. Data were corrected for the diamagnetic contribution calculated from Pascal constants.

    1.2   Synthesis of {[Fe(bpy)(CN)4]2[Ni(bp)2]·2H2O}n (1)

    A 1.0 mL aqueous solution of Ni(BF4)2·6H2O (0.005 mmol) was placed at the bottom of a test tube, a mixture of methanol and water (1:4, V/V, 2 mL) was gently layered on the top of the solution, and then a 1.0 mL methanol solution of Li[Fe(bpy)(CN)4] (0.01 mmol) and 4-phenylpyridine (0.01 mmol) was carefully added as the third layer. After four weeks, red crystals of 1 were obtained and collected after washed with water and air dried. Yield: 57% based on Ni(BF4)2·6H2O. Anal. Calcd. for C50H38Fe2N14NiO2(%): C 57.84, H 3.66, N 18.89; Found(%): C 57.76, H 3.62, N 18.72.

    1.3   Synthesis of {[Fe(bpy)(CN)4]2[Ni(papy)2]· H2O}n (2)

    Red crystals of compound 2 were obtained and collected in the same way as for compound 1, except using 4-(phenyldiazenyl)pyridine (0.01 mmol) to replace 4-phenylpyridine (0.01 mmol). Red crystals appeared after four weeks. Yield: 61% based on Ni(BF4)2·6H2O. Anal. Calcd. for C50H36Fe2N18NiO(%): C 55.79, H 3.35, N 23.43; Found(%): C 55.68, H 3.40, N 23.39.

    1.4   Synthesis of {[Fe(bpy)(CN)4]2[Ni(azp)]·4H2O}n (3)

    One milliliter aqueous solution of Ni(ClO4)2·6H2O (0.005 mmol) was placed at the bottom of a test tube. A mixture of methanol and water (1:2, V/V, 2 mL) was gently layered on the top of the solution, and then 1.0 mL methanol solution of Li[Fe(bpy)(CN)4] (0.01 mmol) and 1, 2-di(pyridin-4-yl)diazene (0.01 mmol) was care-fully added as the third layer. After few weeks, red crystals of 3 were obtained and collected after washed with water and air dried. Yield: 54% based on Ni(ClO4)2 ·6H2O. Anal. Calcd. for C38H32Fe2N16NiO4(%): C 48.14, H 3.38, N 23.65; Found(%): C 48.20, H 3.32, N 23.58.

    1.5   X-ray crystallography

    The data were collected on a Bruker Smart APEX Ⅱ X-diffractometer equipped with graphite monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ=0.071 073 nm) using the SMART and SAINT[27] programs at 298 K for compounds 1~3. Final unit cell parameters were based on all observed reflections from integration of all frame data. The structures were solved in the space group by direct method and refined by the full-matrix least-squares using SHELXTL-97 fitting on F2 [28]. For compounds 1~3, all non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The hydrogen atoms of organic ligands were located geometrically and fixed isotropic thermal parameters. The crystal data and details of the structure refinement of compounds 1~3 are summarized in Table 1. Selected bond distances and angles of comp-ounds 1~3 are listed in Table 2.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Crystal data and structure refinements for compounds 1~3
    下载: 导出CSV
    Compound 1 2 3
    Formula C50H38Fe2N14NiO2 C50H36Fe2N18NiO C38H32Fe2N16NiO4
    Formula weight 1 037.35 1 075.38 947.20
    Crystal system Monoclinic Triclinic Monoclinic
    Space group C2/c P1 I2/m
    a/nm 2.746 9(4) 0.646 13(3) 0.662 18(5)
    b/nm 1.531 4(3) 1.387 02(7) 2.824 22(19)
    c/nm 1.346 4(2) 1.481 53(7) 1.247 16(8)
    α/(°) 109.834 0(10)
    β/(°) 115.369(3) 100.734 0(10) 98.491(4)
    γ/(°) 101.992 0(10)
    V/nm3 5.117 6(14) 1.173 2(10) 2.306 8(3)
    Z 4 1 2
    De (g ·cm-3) 1.346 1.522 1.364
    F(000) 2 128 550 968
    Reflection collected 15 884 43 991 21 420
    Unique reflection (Rint) 4 510 (0.118 7) 4 099 (0.026 8) 2 705 (0.044 7)
    Goodness-of-fit on F2 0.940 1.067 1.224
    R1a [I > 2σ(I)] 0.080 4 0.025 6 0.063 2
    wR2b [I > 2σ(I)] 0.198 8 0.069 5 0.183 5
    $^{\rm{a}}{\rm{ }}{R_1} = \sum \left({\left| {{F_{\rm{o}}}} \right| - |{F_{\rm{c}}}|} \right)/\sum \left| {{F_{\rm{o}}}} \right|; {\; ^{\rm{b}}}{\rm{ }}w{R_2} = {\left[{\sum w{{\left({\left| {{F_{\rm{o}}}} \right| - |{F_{\rm{c}}}|} \right)}^2}/\sum w{F_{\rm{o}}}^2} \right]^{1/2}}.$

    Table 2

    Table 2.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angles (°) for compounds 1~3
    下载: 导出CSV
    1
    Fe(1)-C(12) 0.188 8(7) Fe(1)-N(2) 0.196 8(5) Ni(1)-N(4) 0.203 7(6)
    Fe(1)-C(13) 0.189 1(7) Fe(1)-N(1) 0.197 5(5) Ni(1)-N(7) 0.210 1(7)
    Fe(1)-C(11) 0.193 1(10) Ni(1)-N(4)#1 0.203 7(6) Ni(1)-N(5)#2 0.205 3(6)
    Fe(1)-C(14) 0.195 3(10) Ni(1)-N(5)#3 0.205 3(6) Ni(1)-N(7)#1 0.210 1(7)
    N(3)-C(11)-Fe(1) 178.7(7) N(5)-C(13)-Fe(1) 179.1(7) C(12)-N(4)-Ni(1) 170.1(6)
    N(4)-C(12)-Fe(1) 174.9(7) N(6)-C(14)-Fe(1) 176.9(8) C(13)-N(5)-Ni(1)#3 161.4(5)
    2
    Fe(1)-C(12) 0.190 9(19) Fe(1)-N(1) 0.197 7(15) Ni(1)-N(4)#1 0.209 8(15)
    Fe(1)-C(13) 0.191 1(19) Fe(1)-N(2) 0.197 9(15) Ni(1)-N(4)#2 0.209 8(15)
    Fe(1)-C(14) 0.195 5(2) Ni(1)-N(5) 0.212 2(16) Ni(1)-N(5)#3 0.212 2(16)
    Fe(1)-C(11) 0.196 4(2) Ni(1)-N(7) 0.214 6(15) Ni(1)-N(7)#3 0.214 6(15)
    N(3)-C(11)-Fe(1) 177.46(17) N(5)-C(13)-Fe(1) 173.68(16) C(13)-N(5)-Ni(1) 149.08(14)
    N(4)-C(12)-Fe(1) 172.19(16) N(6)-C(14)-Fe(1) 178.11(18) C(12)-N(4)-Ni(1)#4 163.85(14)
    3
    Fe(1)-C(7) 0.191 4(4) Fe(1)-N(1)#4 0.197 7(4) Ni(1)-N(3)#2 0.207 6(4)
    Fe(1)-C(7)#4 0.191 1(4) Fe(1)-N(1) 0.197 7(4) Ni(1)-N(3)#3 0.207 6(4)
    Fe(1)-C(6)#4 0.191 4(4) Ni(1)-N(3) 0.207 7(4) Ni(1)-N(5)#1 0.210 5(5)
    Fe(1)-C(6) 0.194 6(5) Ni(1)-N(3)#1 0.207 6(4) Ni(1)-N(5) 0.210 5(5)
    N(2)-C(6)-Fe(1) 178.1(5) N(3)-C(7)-Fe(1) 172.3(4) C(7)-N(3)-Ni(1) 160.7(4)
    Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #1: -x+2, -y+1, -z+2; #2: x, -y+1, z+1/2; #3: x+2, y, -z+3/2 for 1; #1: -x+1, -y+1, -z+1; #2: x-1, y, z; #3: -x, -y+1, -z+1; #4: x+1, y, z for 2; #1: -x, -y, -z; #2: x, -y, z; #3: -x, y, -z; #4: -x+1, y, -z for 3.

    CCDC: 1904149, 1; 1904150, 2; 1904151, 3.

    2.   Results and discussion

    2.1   Structure characterization

    Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c, 2 in the triclinic space group P1, and 3 in the monoclinic space group I2/m, respectively (Table 1). All of them show a similar skeleton, constructed by the cyano-bridged Fe2ⅢNiⅡ double-zigzag chains. Uncoor-dinated water molecules are located between the chains. Each repeating unit comprises of neutral [Fe(bpy)(CN)4]2Ni(L)2, in which each nickel ion is coordinated with two ligands L along the apical direction. Different from compounds 1 and 2, the neutral layer of compound 3 is further linked by the bidentate ligands along the apical direction of the Ni(Ⅱ) centers. Within the repeating unit, the nickel ion is coordinated by two nitrogen atoms from the ligands L and four cyanide nitrogen atoms from two contiguous [Fe(bpy)(CN)4]- portions. Each iron ion is located in an octahedral environment, comprising four carbon atoms from the cyanide groups and two nitrogen atoms from the bidentate ligand bpy.

    For compound 1, the Fe-N and Fe-C bond lengths are 0.197(5)~0.198(5) nm and 0.189(7)~0.195(10) nm, respectively, which are characteristic of the LS Fe(Ⅲ) ions. The Ni-N bond distances are in a range of 0.204(6)~0.210(7) nm, which are in good agreement with those of high-spin Ni(Ⅱ) compounds. The Fe-C≡N angles are almost linear with bond angles of 174.9(7)°~179.1(7)°. The values of the C≡N-Ni angles are 161.4(5)°~170.1(6)°. Meanwhile, the π…π (0.376 1 nm) stacking interactions exist between the pyridine rings of adjacent bpy ligands and aromatic rings of the adjacent 4-phenylpyridine ligands. The nearest distance between the adjacent pyridine rings is 0.376 1(2) nm, and the nearest distance of aromatic rings of the 4-phenylpyridine ligands is 0.384 8(2) nm. The shortest intrachain Fe…Fe, Fe…Ni and Ni…Ni distances are 0.707 8(3), 0.502 9(2) and 0.675 9(3) nm, respectively. The nearest interchain Ni…Ni distance is 1.454 8(6) nm, which indicates that interchain magnetic interactions should be weak.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  (a) Side view of 1D double-zigzag chain of 1; (b) Packing structures of 1 via π…π stacking interactions

    H atoms have been omitted for clarity; Atomic scheme: Fe, red; Ni, green; C, grey; N, blue

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  (a) Side view of a 1D double-zigzag chain of 2; (b) Front view of a 3D double-zigzag chain of 3

    H atoms have been omitted for clarity; Atomic scheme: Fe, red; Ni, green; C, grey; N, blue

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    For compound 2, the Fe-N and Fe-C bond lengths are in a range of 0.197 7(15)~0.197 9(15) nm and 0.190 9(19)~0.196 4(2) nm, respectively. The Ni-N distances range from 0.209 8(15) to 0.214 6(15) nm. The Fe-C≡N linkages are close to linearity with bond angles of 172.2(16)°~178.1(18)°. The bond lengths and bond angles of compound 2 confirm that the Fe(Ⅲ) is in the low-spin state. In comparison with compound 1, the C≡N-Ni angles fall in a range of 149.08(14)°~163.85(14)°, which depart significantly from linearity. The shortest intrachain Fe…Fe, Fe…Ni and Ni…Ni distances are 0.646 1(20), 0.507 0(34) and 0.646 1(47) nm, respectively. The nearest interchain Ni…Ni distance is 1.403 2(41) nm.

    For compound 3, the Fe-N (0.197 7(4) nm) and Fe-C (0.191 1(4)~0.194 6(5) nm) bond lengths are in good agreement with the reported LS Fe(Ⅲ) compounds. The Ni-N bond distances are 0.207 6(4)~0.210 5(5) nm. The Fe-C≡N angles deviate slightly from linearity, which are in a range of 172.3(4)°~178.1(5)°. The values of the C≡N-Ni angles are 160.7(4)°. The shortest intrachain Fe…Fe, Fe…Ni and Ni…Ni distances are 0.662 2(5), 0.500 9(7) and 0.662 2(5) nm, respectively. The nearest interchain Ni…Ni distance is 1.322 9(8) nm. Compared with compounds 2 and 3, compound 1 exhibits longer interchain distances, which may diminish the interchain magnetic interactions and benefit for slow magnetic relaxation of SCMs. To further elucidate the differences of them, we applied geometry analysis to see how the ancillary ligands influence the coordination environment of Ni(Ⅱ) ion (Table 3). One can note that coordination environments of Ni(Ⅱ) in compounds 1~3 are all octahedron type and the CShM value of Ni for compound 1 is the highest. This indicates that the Ni(Ⅱ) ion in 1 locates in a more distorted octahedron environment.

    Table 3

    Table 3.  SHAPE analysis of Ni six-coordinated geometry in compound 1~3
    下载: 导出CSV
    HP-6 (D6h) PPY-6 (C5v) OC-6 (Oh) TPR-6 (D3h) JPPY-6 (C5v)
    1 32.101 29.709 0.066 16.177 33.125
    2 32.614 29.640 0.028 16.291 33.103
    3 32.752 28.910 0.048 15.764 32.481
    Abbreviation: HP: exagon, PPY: Pentagonal pyramid, OC: Octahedron, TPR: Trigonal prism, JPPY: Johnson pentagonal pyramid J2.

    2.2   Magnetic characterizations

    Temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibilities data of 1~3 were collected under a DC field of 1 000 Oe in a temperature range of 2~300 K (Fig. 3). The χT values for 1, 2 and 3 were 2.90, 2.74 and 3.06 cm3·mol-1 ·K at 300 K, respectively, which are approxima-tively in a range of 2.48~2.80 cm3·mol-1·K expected for two LS Fe(Ⅲ) (S=1/2, g=2.6~2.8) and one HS Ni(Ⅱ) (S=1, g=2.2~2.3). When the temperature went down, χT values of 1~3 first increased smoothly and then increased rapidly at 80, 60 and 50 K, respectively, reaching the maximum values of 52.16, 35.68 and 14.59 cm3·mol-1·K at 4.2, 3.9 and 2.4 K. The χT vs T plots indicate the typical ferromagnetic interaction between Fe(Ⅲ) and Ni(Ⅱ) ions within the chain. When the temperature decreased further to 2 K, the χT values of 1 and 2 decreased and reached the values of 33.1 and 25.50 cm3·mol-1·K, respectively. It is probably caused by the zero-field splitting of Ni(Ⅱ) ions and/or weak interchain antiferromagnetic interactions. In the temperature range of 30~300 K, the magnetic suscep-tibility data of 1~3 were fitted with the Curie-Weiss law, giving Curie constant C of 2.78, 2.65 and 2.55 cm3·mol-1·K and Weiss constant θ of 11.27, 9.29 and 3.05 K, respectively. The positive Weiss constants of 1~3 further confirm the ferromagnetic coupling interac-tions between Fe(Ⅲ) and Ni(Ⅱ) ions. Meanwhile, the field-dependent magnetization at 2 K also confirms the ferromagnetic behavior. The isothermal magnetization of 1~3 first increased linearly and then increased gradually, reaching a maximum value of 4.35Nβ, 4.20Nβ and 4.52Nβ at 50 kOe, respectively. The values are close to the saturation value for two magnetically isolated low-spin Fe(Ⅲ) ions and one magnetically isolated high-spin Ni(Ⅱ) ion.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibilities of 1 (a), 2 (b) and 3 (c) in a temperature range of 2~300 K under an applied field of 1 000 Oe and field-dependent magnetizations of 1 (d), 2 (e) and 3 (f)

    Solid line: the fitting to the Curie-Weiss law

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    To further probe the dynamics of the magnetization of the three compounds, the alternating current (ac) magnetic susceptibilities were studied. For compounds 2 and 3, no obvious frequency-dependent in-phase (χ′) and out-of-phase signals (χ″) were observed, indicating that compounds 2 and 3 are not single-chain magnets (Fig. 4(a) and (b)). For compound 1, temperature- and frequency-dependent in-phase components (χ′) were observed below 2.8 K, as shown in Fig. 4(c). Moreover, the plots of field-cooled magne-tization (FC) and zero-field-cooled magnetization (ZFC) under a field of 100 Oe of 1 showed no bifurcation (Fig. 5), excluding the spontaneous magnetization above 1.8 K. The generalized Debye model was used to extract the energy barrier based on the relationship of ln(χ′/χ″)=ln(ωτ0)+Ea/(kBT). The obtained energy barrier Ea/kB was 10.9 K and the relaxation time τ0 was 7.8×10-4 s (Fig. 6), which are in the typical range for SCMs.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  Frequency dependence of ac magnetic signals of compounds 2 (a) and 3 (b) at Hac=3.5 Oe and Hdc=0 Oe; Frequency dependence of ac magnetic signals of compound 1 (c, d)
    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  Field-cooled magnetization (FC) and zero field- cooled magnetization (ZFC) curves of compound 1
    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  Plots of ln(χ″/χ′) vs 1/T for 1

    Solid line represents the fitting results over a range of 2.0~2.8 K

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    Three cyano-bridged Fe2ⅢNiⅡ double-zigzag chains show different magnetic behaviors. The neutral ancillary ligands should be the main reason for the different magnetic behaviors of them. For compounds 1~3, ferromagnetic interactions exist between the Fe(Ⅲ) and Ni(Ⅱ) ions, which can be rationalized according to the orthogonality of the magnetic orbitals of the low-spin Fe(Ⅲ) and high-spin Ni(Ⅱ) ions[29-35]. Compared to compounds 2 and 3, the Ni-N≡C bending angle of compound 1 is smaller, which presents a stronger ferromagnetic interaction. In addition, when the Ni-N≡C angles further decrease, an antiferromagnetic contribution will arise and the overall magnetic coupling would be weakened[35]. Although there exist π…π stacking interactions between the interchain in compound 1, the nearest interchain Ni…Ni distance 1.454 8(6) nm is the largest among the three comp-ounds. Such a large interchain distance will diminish the interchain magnetic interactions and benefit for the SCM behavior. It is worth noting that steric hindrance can enhance the bending of the C≡N-Ni angle and elongate the Ni-N bond lengths. The smaller bending angle of C≡N-Ni and shorter Ni-N bond length should be also responsible for the single-chain magnet behavior of compound 1. For the ligand shape, these results indicate that the introduction of long monodentate ligand plays an important role for obtaining SCMs.

    3.   Conclusions

    In summary, three new cyano-bridged Fe2ⅢNiⅡ double-zigzag chains, {[Fe(bpy)(CN)4]2[Ni(bp)2]·2H2O}n (1), {[Fe(bpy)(CN)4]2[Ni(papy)2]·H2O}n(2) and {[Fe(bpy)(CN)4]2[Ni(azp)]·4H2O}n (3) were synthesized. The magnetic studies demonstrate the existence of ferro-magnetic interactions between Fe(Ⅲ) and Ni(Ⅱ) ions and slow magnetic relaxation behavior of compound 1. Compounds 2 and 3 show ferromagnetic behavior but no single-chain magnets property. Our results demon-strate that ancillary ligands play an important role in influencing the intra- and interchain interactions as well as the local coordination environments. This work is useful for the design of new SCMs in the future.

    1. [1]

      Myers E B, Ralph D C, Katine J A, et al. Science, 1999, 285:867-870 doi: 10.1126/science.285.5429.867

    2. [2]

      Troiani F, Affronte M. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40:3119-3129 doi: 10.1039/c0cs00158a

    3. [3]

      Shiraishi M, Ikoma T. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 189:95-127

    4. [4]

      Rinehart J D, Long J R. Chem. Sci., 2011, 2:2078-2085 doi: 10.1039/c1sc00513h

    5. [5]

      Cucinotta G, Perfetti M, Luzon J, et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51:1606-1610 doi: 10.1002/anie.201107453

    6. [6]

      Wang C F, Zuo J L, Bartlett B M, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128:7162-7163 doi: 10.1021/ja061788+

    7. [7]

      Guo Y N, Xu G F, Guo Y, et al. Dalton Trans., 2011, 40:9953-9963 doi: 10.1039/c1dt10474h

    8. [8]

      Koo B H, Lim K S, Ryu D W, et al. Chem. Commun., 2012, 48:2519-2521 doi: 10.1039/c2cc17467g

    9. [9]

      Glauber R J. J. Math. Phys., 1963, 4:294-307 doi: 10.1063/1.1703954

    10. [10]

      Caneschi A, Gatteschi D, Lalioti N, et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2001, 40:1760-1763 doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20010504)40:9<1760::AID-ANIE17600>3.0.CO;2-U

    11. [11]

      Clérac R, Miyasaka H, Yamashita M, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124:12837-12844 doi: 10.1021/ja0203115

    12. [12]

      Palii A V, Reu O S, Ostrovsky S M, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130:14729-14738 doi: 10.1021/ja8050052

    13. [13]

      Bogani L, Vindigni A. J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18:4750-4758 doi: 10.1039/b807824f

    14. [14]

      Zhang W X, Ishikawa R, Breedlove B, et al. RSC Adv., 2013, 3:3772-3798 doi: 10.1039/c2ra22675h

    15. [15]

      Liu T, Zheng H, Kang S, et al. Nat. Commun., 2013, 4:2826-2832 doi: 10.1038/ncomms3826

    16. [16]

      Heintze E, Hallak F E, Clauß C, et al. Nat. Mater., 2013, 12:202-206 doi: 10.1038/nmat3498

    17. [17]

      郑慧, 徐杨, 段春迎.无机化学学报, 2015, 31:1460-1466ZHENG Hui, XU Yang, DUAN Chun-Ying. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2015, 31:1460-1466

    18. [18]

      矫成奇, 姜文静, 文雯, 等.无机化学学报, 2016, 32:1637-1646JIAO Cheng-Qi, JIANG Wen-Jing, WEN Wen, et al. Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 2016, 32:1637-1646

    19. [19]

      Wang S, Ding X H, Li Y H, et al. Coord. Chem. Rev., 2012, 255:1713-1732

    20. [20]

      Zhang Y J, Liu T, Kanegawa S, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132:912-913 doi: 10.1021/ja908670u

    21. [21]

      Jiang W, Jiao C, Meng Y, et al. Chem. Sci., 2017, 9:617-622

    22. [22]

      Miyasaka H, Julve M, Yamashita M, et al. Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48:3420-3437 doi: 10.1021/ic802050j

    23. [23]

      Harris T D, Bennett M V, Clérac R, et al. ChemInform, 2010, 41:3980-3988

    24. [24]

      Bernot K, Bogani L, Caneschi A, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128:7947-7956 doi: 10.1021/ja061101l

    25. [25]

      Li X B, Zhang J Y, Wang Y Q, et al. Chem. Eur. J., 2011, 17:13883-13891 doi: 10.1002/chem.201101477

    26. [26]

      Luminita M T, Rodrigue L Z, Jorge P, et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128:4842-4853 doi: 10.1021/ja058030v

    27. [27]

      SMART, SAINT and XPREP, Area Detector and Data Integ-ration and Reduction Software, Bruker Analytical Instruments Inc., Madison, WI, 1995.

    28. [28]

      Sheldtrick G M. SHELXS-97, Program for X-ray Crystal Structure Solution and Refinement, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1997.

    29. [29]

      Panja A, Guionneau P, Jeon I R, et al. Inorg. Chem., 2012, 51:12350-12359 doi: 10.1021/ic301661x

    30. [30]

      Zhang Y Z, Mallik U P, Clérac R, et al. Polyhedron, 2013, 52:115-121 doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2012.10.039

    31. [31]

      Gu Z G, Yang Q F, Liu W, et al. Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45:8895-8901 doi: 10.1021/ic060772h

    32. [32]

      Hoshino N, Sekine Y, Nihei M, et al. Chem. Commun., 2010, 46:6117-6119 doi: 10.1039/c0cc00184h

    33. [33]

      Wang S, Zuo J L, Zhou H C, et al. Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2005, 358:2101-2106 doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2004.12.034

    34. [34]

      Wu D, Zhang Y, Huang W, et al. Dalton Trans., 2010, 39:5500-5503 doi: 10.1039/b925698a

    35. [35]

      Rebilly J N, Mallah T. Struct. Bond., 2006, 122:103-131

  • Figure 1  (a) Side view of 1D double-zigzag chain of 1; (b) Packing structures of 1 via π…π stacking interactions

    H atoms have been omitted for clarity; Atomic scheme: Fe, red; Ni, green; C, grey; N, blue

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    Figure 2  (a) Side view of a 1D double-zigzag chain of 2; (b) Front view of a 3D double-zigzag chain of 3

    H atoms have been omitted for clarity; Atomic scheme: Fe, red; Ni, green; C, grey; N, blue

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    Figure 3  Temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibilities of 1 (a), 2 (b) and 3 (c) in a temperature range of 2~300 K under an applied field of 1 000 Oe and field-dependent magnetizations of 1 (d), 2 (e) and 3 (f)

    Solid line: the fitting to the Curie-Weiss law

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    Figure 4  Frequency dependence of ac magnetic signals of compounds 2 (a) and 3 (b) at Hac=3.5 Oe and Hdc=0 Oe; Frequency dependence of ac magnetic signals of compound 1 (c, d)

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    Figure 5  Field-cooled magnetization (FC) and zero field- cooled magnetization (ZFC) curves of compound 1

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    Figure 6  Plots of ln(χ″/χ′) vs 1/T for 1

    Solid line represents the fitting results over a range of 2.0~2.8 K

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    Table 1.  Crystal data and structure refinements for compounds 1~3

    Compound 1 2 3
    Formula C50H38Fe2N14NiO2 C50H36Fe2N18NiO C38H32Fe2N16NiO4
    Formula weight 1 037.35 1 075.38 947.20
    Crystal system Monoclinic Triclinic Monoclinic
    Space group C2/c P1 I2/m
    a/nm 2.746 9(4) 0.646 13(3) 0.662 18(5)
    b/nm 1.531 4(3) 1.387 02(7) 2.824 22(19)
    c/nm 1.346 4(2) 1.481 53(7) 1.247 16(8)
    α/(°) 109.834 0(10)
    β/(°) 115.369(3) 100.734 0(10) 98.491(4)
    γ/(°) 101.992 0(10)
    V/nm3 5.117 6(14) 1.173 2(10) 2.306 8(3)
    Z 4 1 2
    De (g ·cm-3) 1.346 1.522 1.364
    F(000) 2 128 550 968
    Reflection collected 15 884 43 991 21 420
    Unique reflection (Rint) 4 510 (0.118 7) 4 099 (0.026 8) 2 705 (0.044 7)
    Goodness-of-fit on F2 0.940 1.067 1.224
    R1a [I > 2σ(I)] 0.080 4 0.025 6 0.063 2
    wR2b [I > 2σ(I)] 0.198 8 0.069 5 0.183 5
    $^{\rm{a}}{\rm{ }}{R_1} = \sum \left({\left| {{F_{\rm{o}}}} \right| - |{F_{\rm{c}}}|} \right)/\sum \left| {{F_{\rm{o}}}} \right|; {\; ^{\rm{b}}}{\rm{ }}w{R_2} = {\left[{\sum w{{\left({\left| {{F_{\rm{o}}}} \right| - |{F_{\rm{c}}}|} \right)}^2}/\sum w{F_{\rm{o}}}^2} \right]^{1/2}}.$
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 2.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angles (°) for compounds 1~3

    1
    Fe(1)-C(12) 0.188 8(7) Fe(1)-N(2) 0.196 8(5) Ni(1)-N(4) 0.203 7(6)
    Fe(1)-C(13) 0.189 1(7) Fe(1)-N(1) 0.197 5(5) Ni(1)-N(7) 0.210 1(7)
    Fe(1)-C(11) 0.193 1(10) Ni(1)-N(4)#1 0.203 7(6) Ni(1)-N(5)#2 0.205 3(6)
    Fe(1)-C(14) 0.195 3(10) Ni(1)-N(5)#3 0.205 3(6) Ni(1)-N(7)#1 0.210 1(7)
    N(3)-C(11)-Fe(1) 178.7(7) N(5)-C(13)-Fe(1) 179.1(7) C(12)-N(4)-Ni(1) 170.1(6)
    N(4)-C(12)-Fe(1) 174.9(7) N(6)-C(14)-Fe(1) 176.9(8) C(13)-N(5)-Ni(1)#3 161.4(5)
    2
    Fe(1)-C(12) 0.190 9(19) Fe(1)-N(1) 0.197 7(15) Ni(1)-N(4)#1 0.209 8(15)
    Fe(1)-C(13) 0.191 1(19) Fe(1)-N(2) 0.197 9(15) Ni(1)-N(4)#2 0.209 8(15)
    Fe(1)-C(14) 0.195 5(2) Ni(1)-N(5) 0.212 2(16) Ni(1)-N(5)#3 0.212 2(16)
    Fe(1)-C(11) 0.196 4(2) Ni(1)-N(7) 0.214 6(15) Ni(1)-N(7)#3 0.214 6(15)
    N(3)-C(11)-Fe(1) 177.46(17) N(5)-C(13)-Fe(1) 173.68(16) C(13)-N(5)-Ni(1) 149.08(14)
    N(4)-C(12)-Fe(1) 172.19(16) N(6)-C(14)-Fe(1) 178.11(18) C(12)-N(4)-Ni(1)#4 163.85(14)
    3
    Fe(1)-C(7) 0.191 4(4) Fe(1)-N(1)#4 0.197 7(4) Ni(1)-N(3)#2 0.207 6(4)
    Fe(1)-C(7)#4 0.191 1(4) Fe(1)-N(1) 0.197 7(4) Ni(1)-N(3)#3 0.207 6(4)
    Fe(1)-C(6)#4 0.191 4(4) Ni(1)-N(3) 0.207 7(4) Ni(1)-N(5)#1 0.210 5(5)
    Fe(1)-C(6) 0.194 6(5) Ni(1)-N(3)#1 0.207 6(4) Ni(1)-N(5) 0.210 5(5)
    N(2)-C(6)-Fe(1) 178.1(5) N(3)-C(7)-Fe(1) 172.3(4) C(7)-N(3)-Ni(1) 160.7(4)
    Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: #1: -x+2, -y+1, -z+2; #2: x, -y+1, z+1/2; #3: x+2, y, -z+3/2 for 1; #1: -x+1, -y+1, -z+1; #2: x-1, y, z; #3: -x, -y+1, -z+1; #4: x+1, y, z for 2; #1: -x, -y, -z; #2: x, -y, z; #3: -x, y, -z; #4: -x+1, y, -z for 3.
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 3.  SHAPE analysis of Ni six-coordinated geometry in compound 1~3

    HP-6 (D6h) PPY-6 (C5v) OC-6 (Oh) TPR-6 (D3h) JPPY-6 (C5v)
    1 32.101 29.709 0.066 16.177 33.125
    2 32.614 29.640 0.028 16.291 33.103
    3 32.752 28.910 0.048 15.764 32.481
    Abbreviation: HP: exagon, PPY: Pentagonal pyramid, OC: Octahedron, TPR: Trigonal prism, JPPY: Johnson pentagonal pyramid J2.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
WeChat 扫一扫看文章
计量
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 文章访问数:  502
  • HTML全文浏览量:  65
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2019-09-10
  • 收稿日期:  2019-03-20
  • 修回日期:  2019-06-30
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章

All Rights Reserved by the Chinese Chemical Society   中国化学会 版权所有 京ICP备05002797号

本系统由北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司开发    技术支持: info@rhhz.net