English

• Near-infrared (NIR) emitters have shown great potential applications in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), night vision, sensing, optical communications etc. [1-5]. However, the fast non-radiative transition of long-wavelengths governed by the energy gap law usually causes low luminescent efficiency [6,7]. For this reason, efficient NIR electroluminescent materials usually require a strong spin-coupling (SOC) effect and short excited state lifetime, i.e., a high utilization of triplet excitons and low non-radiation energy loss [1,8-10]. To date, several NIR emitters based on transition metal complexes have been widely developed due to their efficient phosphorescent emission characteristics [11-18]. However, most of the developed NIR emitting complexes are constructed from large substituents, increased π-conjugation length, additional heteroatoms/heterocycles, as well as the introduced additional donor-acceptor (D-A) units, which usually lead to significant difficulties in their synthesis [12,15,19,20]. In addition, although six-coordinated families, such as iridium(Ⅲ), osmium(Ⅱ) and ruthenium(Ⅲ) complexes, can inhibit intermolecular aggregation, they also increase the molecular weight, which is not conducive to sublimation and purification [17,21-23]. When compared to the six-coordinated octahedral geometry, platinum(Ⅱ) complexes with a four-coordinate square planar geometry form strong Pt-Pt interactions and exhibit unique photophysical properties, which are responsible for many key features, such as ligand to ligand charge transfer (LLCT), metal to ligand charge transfer (MLCT) and intramolecular ligand charge transfer (ILCT). As a result, several classes of phosphorescent platinum(Ⅱ) complexes with high photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQYs), good color tunability, and high thermal stability have been explored as high performance NIR OLEDs [24-30].

  Building molecules with electron-donating (D) and electron-accepting (A) units is the most efficient way to achieve NIR emission. The energy gap and electronic properties of these compounds can be readily and effectively tuned by controlling the structures of the D and A units [31-35]. Based on this strategy, several bidentate ligands have been reported to construct NIR emitting platinum(Ⅱ) complexes. However, their intra-ligand (IL) excited state with metal perturbation limits their radiative decay rate in the order of 10⁴ s^–1 or smaller [1,36-38]. Therefore, a more rigid tetradentate ligand is desirable to suppress the non-radiative decay. The advantages of tetradentate platinum(Ⅱ) complexes include: (ⅰ) avoiding energy loss via LLCT, improving the phosphorescent emission efficiency; (ⅱ) inhibiting intramolecular vibration using a more rigid coordination plane, which further reduces non-radiative energy loss; and (ⅲ) improving the stability.

  Herein, we have designed a tetradentate platinum(Ⅱ) complex (TPA-2Q-Pt) using triphenylamine (TPA) as a donor (D) and quinolone (Q) as an acceptor (A). The four tert-butyl groups on the TPA unit can improve the solubility, increase the electron-donating ability and inhibit intermolecular aggregation. In addition, the steric hinderance between the two quinoline units forms a distorted structure, which further reduces the intermolecular aggregation. Notably, remarkable NIR emission with peaks at 735 and 750 nm were observed for its dichloromethane solution and neat film, respectively. This complex exhibited efficient and short-lived NIR emissions from the ^1/3MLCT states, which led to high performance OLEDs with maximum external quantum efficiencies of 5.2% and radiance of 74626 mW sr^–1 m^–2. Of note, the device achieved appealing operational lifetimes (LT₉₀) of 119 h under a radiance of 5000 mW sr^–1 m^–2.

  TPA-2Q-Pt was prepared using a three-step method involving Suzuki coupling, Buchwald-Hartwig coupling and coordination reactions (Scheme 1). The complex was sublimated for purification under a pressure of < 10^–4 Pa and temperature of ~280 ℃. The complex was characterized using ¹H NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, elemental analysis and single crystal X-ray diffraction studies (Fig. 1 and Table S1 in Supporting information), confirming its well-defined chemical structure. As shown in Fig. 1a, this complex presents a relatively twisted configuration: the movable benzene ring in TPA had a dihedral angle of ~84° with the coordination plane, and two quinolines in the same molecule also showed an angle of ~45° due to steric hindrance. There was no intermolecular Pt-Pt interaction. Intermolecular π-π stacking between two quinolines in different molecules were observed with distances of ~3.3 Å (Figs. 1b and c). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) under an N₂ atmosphere showed a high decomposition temperature (T_d) of 356 ℃ with 5% weight loss (Table 1 and Fig. S1 in Supporting information), which revealed the high thermal stability of the complex for the fabrication of OLEDs. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations revealed the MLCT and ILCT nature of their excited states. As expected, the HOMO was dominated by the platinum atom and TPA donor, and the LUMO was localized on the quinoline acceptors (Fig. S2 in Supporting information).

  Scheme 1

  

  Scheme 1.  Synthetic route of TPA-2Q-Pt.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  X-ray crystal structures of TPA-2Q-Pt.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Table 1

  

  Table 1.  Photophysical data for TPA-2Q-Pt.

  DownLoad: CSV

  λema (nm)	τb (µs)	τc (µs)	Фpd (%)	kr e (105 s−1)	knr e (105 s−1)	Tdf (℃)
  735/711/755	0.49/0.72	1.4/1.6	15	1.1	6.1	356
  a In deaerated dichloromethane (10−5 mol/L, left), 5 wt% PMMA doped film (middle) and neat film (right), respectively. b In neat film after being aerated (left) and degassed (right). c In 5 wt% PMMA doped film after being aerated (left) and degassed (right). d Absolute photoluminescence quantum yield evaluated using an integrating sphere for the 5 wt% PMMA doped film after being degassed. e Calculated using kr = Ф/τ and knr = (1 – Ф)/τ. f The temperature at a weight loss of 5% under an N2 atmosphere.

  As shown in Fig. 2a, the cyclic voltammetry curve of TPA-2Q-Pt exhibited a reversible oxidation potential at 0.49 V versus ferrocene (Fc/Fc⁺). The oxidation potential corresponded to the change in the distribution of the HOMO. The energy level of the HOMO (E_HOMO) was calculated to be –4.83 eV from the empirical relationship [39]. The energy level of the LUMO (E_LUMO) was further calculated to be –2.99 eV according to the energy level of the optical band gap. Fig. 2b depicted the UV-vis absorption and photoluminescence spectra of the TPA-2Q-Pt complex in dichloromethane. The intense absorption at < 370 nm could be assigned to the spin-allowed π-π* electronic transition. The next weaker absorption band at ~440 nm was ascribed to the singlet state of metal-to-ligand charge transfer (¹MLCT). The lowest absorption band at 500–700 nm with relatively small absorptivity originated from the enhanced transitions with ³MLCT. In dichloromethane, TPA-2Q-Pt exhibited a broad, structureless photoluminescence with a peak at 735 nm. An obviously blue-shifted emission at 711 nm and red-shifted emission at 755 nm were observed in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) doped film (5 wt%) and neat film, respectively. This characteristic was consistent with the intermolecular π-π stacking. A PLQY of 15% was observed in the 5 wt% doped PMMA film, which was ascribed to its fast non-radiative decay mainly determined by the energy gap law [6,7]. Notably, the emission lifetimes were determined to be 0.49 and 0.72 µs for the aerated and degassed neat films, as well as 1.4 and 1.6 µs for the aerated and degassed for 5 wt% PMMA doped films, respectively, which verified the phosphorescent emission characteristics (Figs. 2c and d). The lifetime of the doped film is longer than that of the neat film due to the aggregation-caused concentration quenching. Consequently, the radiative transition rate (k_r) and non-radiative decay (k_nr) were calculated to be 1.1 × 10⁵ and 6.1 × 10⁵ s^–1 for the 5 wt% PMMA doped film, respectively. Selected photophysical properties data are summarized in Table 1.

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  (a) Cyclic voltammograms obtained for the complex films formed on a platinum electrode in an acetonitrile solution using 0.1 mol/L Bu₄NPF₆ and ferrocene as the electrolyte and internal standard. (b) Ultraviolet-visible absorption and photoluminescence spectra with an excitation wavelength of 485 nm. (c) PL decay characteristics of the neat film, and (d) 5 wt% PMMA doped film with an excitation wavelength of 485 nm.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The electroluminescence (EL) properties of the complex were examined in a device structure comprised of ITO/HATCN (5 nm)/TPD15 (30 nm)/TCTA (15 nm)/DMIC-CZ + DMIC-TRZ: emitter (50 nm)/ANT-BIZ (30 nm)/Liq (2 nm)/Al (100 nm). The chemical structures and functions of 1,4,5,8,9,11-hexaazatriphenylene-hexacarbonitrile (HATCN), 4,4′-bis[N, N-di(1,1′-biphenyl-4-yl)amino]-1,1′-biphenyl (TPD15), tris(4-carbazolyl-9-ylphenyl)amine (TCTA), 5,7-dihydro-7,7-dimethyl-5-phenyl-3-(9-phenyl-9H-carbazol-3-yl)-indeno[2,1-b]carbazole (DMIC-CZ), 1,3-dihydro-1,1-di-methyl-3-(3-(4,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)phenyl)-indeno-[2,1-b]carbazole (DMIC-TRZ) and 1-[4-(10-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-yl-9-anthracenyl)phenyl]-2-ethyl-1H-benzimidazole (ANT-BIZ) are shown in Fig. S3 (Supporting information). Here, the HATCN, TPD15, TCTA, and ANT-BIZ are served as hole injection, hole transporting, electron blocking, and electron transporting layers, respectively. A mixture consisting of DMIC-CZ and DMIC-TRZ by co-evaporation was used as the exciplex host in order to obtain better device performance [40,41]. The device characteristics at various dopant concentrations are provided in Table 2, Table S2 and Fig. S4 (Supporting information). The maximum EQEs were decreased from 5.2% to 4.6% and 4.1% upon increasing the doping ratio from 3 wt% to 6 wt% and 9 wt%, which was attributed to the concentration quenching and triplet-triplet annihilation effect [42]. The related curves for the best-performing device (3 wt%) are also shown in Figs. 3a–c. The maximum EQE of the TPA-2Q-Pt based device was 5.2% with an electroluminescence peak at 730 nm and maximum radiance of 74626 mW sr^–1 m⁻². Moreover, the EQEs at 1000, 5000 and 10,000 mW sr^–1 m^–2 were maintained at 5.1%, 4.6% and 4.0%, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, the maximum EQE of 5.2% for TPA-2Q-Pt is among the highest NIR device efficiencies at wavelengths beyond 720 nm based on platinum(Ⅱ) emitters without relying on intramolecular and/or intermolecular Pt-Pt interactions (MMLCT) [2,5,8,16,28].

  Table 2

  

  Table 2.  Key device data obtained for selected NIR OLEDs.

  DownLoad: CSV

  Concentrations	λEL, maxa (nm)	Rmaxb (mW sr−1 m−2)	EQEsc (%)	CIEx, yd
  3 wt%	730	74626	5.2/5.1/4.6/4.0	0.65, 0.32
  6 wt%	733	63308	4.5/4.4/4.1/3.5	0.70, 0.32
  9 wt%	737	61186	4.1/4.0/3.6/3.4	0.68, 0.28
  a Wavelength of the EL maximum. b Maximum radiance. c Maximum/@1000 mW sr−1 m−2/@5000 mW sr−1 m−2/@10000 mW sr−1 m−2. d Commission Internationalede L'Eclairage (CIE) coordinate @ EQEmax.

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  (a) Normalized EL spectra. (b) EQE versus the radiance of the devices. (c) J-R-V characteristics. (d) Normalized EL intensity (left) and driving voltage (right) of the device versus operating time.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The operational stability of this emitter was assessed in the same device structure (Fig. S3). The device was operated at a constant current of 2 mA, corresponding to an initial radiance of 5000 mW sr^–1 m^–2. As shown in Fig. 3d, the LT₉₀ values (the time required for the luminance to drop to 90% of its initial value) was 119 h. By roughly assuming a moderate acceleration factor of 1.6, the LT₉₀ at 1000 and 100 mW sr^–1 m^–2 were estimated to be 1562 and 62215 h, respectively, which represent the best stability for NIR OLEDs [8,43]. Notably, there was no obvious abrupt drop during operational period, which was different from the majority of previously reported device stability tests, and the driving voltage required by the device to maintain 2 mA was maintained at ~7 V, so that the device maintained a stable state without being broken-down.

  To summarize, a novel platinum(Ⅱ) complex exhibiting efficient NIR phosphorescence has been developed. The use of electron-donating TPA and electron-withdrawing quinolone guaranteed its long wavelength emission. The tetradentate coordination geometry confined the rigid structure and reduced non-radiation energy loss. The OLEDs based this complex showed high efficiencies, small efficiency roll-off, and excellent stability. This study provided a new strategy for the construction of novel NIR phosphorescent materials and demonstrated the potential application of tetradentate cyclometalated platinum complexes in NIR electroluminescent devices.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  Acknowledgments

  This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51903157 and 52130308), the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Nos. KQTD20170330110107046 and ZDSYS20210623091813040), and the School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Light-Electricity-Heat Energy-Converting Materials and Applications (No. GDRGCS2021001). We thank the Instrumental Analysis Center of Shenzhen University for analytical support.

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.04.043.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     H. Xiang, J. Cheng, X. Ma, X. Zhou, J.J. Chruma, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42(2013) 6128–6185. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60029g

  2. [2]

     Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Song, et al., Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(2018) 1800466. doi: 10.1002/adom.201800466

  3. [3]

     J.O. Escobedo, O. Rusin, S. Lim, R.M. Strongin, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 14(2010) 64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.10.022

  4. [4]

     V. Pansare, S. Hejazi, W. Faenza, R.K. Prud'homme, Chem. Mater. 24(2012) 812–827. doi: 10.1021/cm2028367

  5. [5]

     A. Zampetti, A. Minotto, F. Cacialli, Adv. Funct. Mater. 29(2019) 1807623. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201807623

  6. [6]

     G.H. Allen, R.P. White, D.P. Rillema, T.J. Meyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106(1984) 2613–2620. doi: 10.1021/ja00321a020

  7. [7]

     R. Englman, J. Jortner, Mol. Phys. 18(1970) 145–164. doi: 10.1080/00268977000100171

  8. [8]

     Y. Zhang, J. Miao, J. Xiong, K. Li, C. Yang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61(2022) e202113718.

  9. [9]

     P. Jiang, J. Miao, X. Cao, et al., Adv. Mater. 34(2022) e2106954. doi: 10.1002/adma.202106954

  10. [10]

      C.Y. Kuei, W.L. Tsai, B. Tong, et al., Adv. Mater. 28(2016) 2795–2800. doi: 10.1002/adma.201505790

  11. [11]

      W. Xiong, F. Meng, C. You, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 7(2019) 630–638. doi: 10.1039/C8TC05263H

  12. [12]

      C. You, D. Liu, J. Yu, et al., Adv. Opt. Mater. 8(2020) 2000154. doi: 10.1002/adom.202000154

  13. [13]

      S. Kesarkar, W. Mroz, M. Penconi, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55(2016) 2714–2718. doi: 10.1002/anie.201509798

  14. [14]

      J. Xue, L. Xin, J. Hou, et al., Chem. Mater. 29(2017) 4775–4782. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00518

  15. [15]

      D. Ma, T. Tsuboi, Y. Qiu, L. Duan, Adv. Mater. 29(2017) 1603253. doi: 10.1002/adma.201603253

  16. [16]

      K.T. Ly, R.W. Chen-Cheng, H.W. Lin, et al., Nat. Photonics 11(2016) 63–68.

  17. [17]

      X. Cao, J. Miao, M. Zhu, et al., Chem. Mater. 27(2014) 96–104.

  18. [18]

      J. Zhao, K. Yan, G. Xu, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 31(2021) 2008325. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202008325

  19. [19]

      Y. Zhang, F. Meng, C. You, et al., Dyes Pigm. 138(2017) 100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.11.034

  20. [20]

      Y. Zhang, Z. Yin, F. Meng, et al., Org. Electron. 50(2017) 317. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.08.006

  21. [21]

      F. Wei, S.L. Lai, S. Zhao, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141(2019) 12863–12871. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b06308

  22. [22]

      M. Schulze, A. Steffen, F. Wurthner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(2015) 1570– 1573. doi: 10.1002/anie.201410437

  23. [23]

      J. Liao, Y. Chi, S.H. Liu, et al., Inorg. Chem. 53(2014) 9366–9374. doi: 10.1021/ic501474r

  24. [24]

      G. Cheng, Q. Wan, W.H. Ang, et al., Adv. Opt. Mater. 7(2018) 1801452.

  25. [25]

      Y. Sun, C. Borek, K. Hanson, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(2007) 213503. doi: 10.1063/1.2740113

  26. [26]

      M. Chaaban, Y.C. Chi, M. Worku, et al., Inorg. Chem. 59(2020) 13109–13116. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01256

  27. [27]

      X. Wu, D. Chen, D. Liu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142(2020) 7469–7479. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b13956

  28. [28]

      P. Ganesan, W.Y. Hung, J.Y. Tso, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 29(2019) 1900923. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201900923

  29. [29]

      K. Zhang, T. Wang, T. Wu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 9(2021) 2282–2290. doi: 10.1039/D0TC05397J

  30. [30]

      S. Yang, F. Meng, X. Wu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 6(2018) 5769–5777. doi: 10.1039/C8TC01142G

  31. [31]

      G. Qian, Z. Zhong, M. Luo, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 113(2009) 1589–1595. doi: 10.1021/jp809568a

  32. [32]

      G. Qian, Z. Zhong, M. Luo, et al., Adv. Mater. 21(2009) 111–116. doi: 10.1002/adma.200801918

  33. [33]

      C. Li, R. Duan, B. Liang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56(2017) 11525–11529. doi: 10.1002/anie.201706464

  34. [34]

      U. Balijapalli, R. Nagata, N. Yamada, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(2021) 8477–8482. doi: 10.1002/anie.202016089

  35. [35]

      Z. Cai, X. Wu, H. Liu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(2021) 23635–23640. doi: 10.1002/anie.202111172

  36. [36]

      T. Strassner, Acc. Chem. Res. 49(2016) 2680–2689. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00240

  37. [37]

      Y. Sun, X. Yang, B. Liu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 7(2019) 12552–12559. doi: 10.1039/C9TC03838H

  38. [38]

      X. Yang, X. Xu, J. Zhao, et al., Inorg. Chem. 53(2014) 12986–13000. doi: 10.1021/ic502122t

  39. [39]

      C.M. Cardona, W. Li, A.E. Kaifer, D. Stockdale, G.C. Bazan, Adv. Mater. 23(2011) 2367–2371. doi: 10.1002/adma.201004554

  40. [40]

      Y.S. Park, S. Lee, K.H. Kim, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 23(2013) 4914–4920. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201300547

  41. [41]

      Y. Seino, H. Sasabe, Y.J. Pu, J. Kido, Adv. Mater. 26(2014) 1612–1616. doi: 10.1002/adma.201304253

  42. [42]

      B. Wang, F. Liang, H. Hu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. C 3(2015) 8212–8218. doi: 10.1039/C5TC01449B

  43. [43]

      L. Cao, J. Li, Z.Q. Zhu, L. Huang, J. Li, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13(2021) 60261–60268. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c17335

• 

  Scheme 1  Synthetic route of TPA-2Q-Pt.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 1  X-ray crystal structures of TPA-2Q-Pt.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  (a) Cyclic voltammograms obtained for the complex films formed on a platinum electrode in an acetonitrile solution using 0.1 mol/L Bu₄NPF₆ and ferrocene as the electrolyte and internal standard. (b) Ultraviolet-visible absorption and photoluminescence spectra with an excitation wavelength of 485 nm. (c) PL decay characteristics of the neat film, and (d) 5 wt% PMMA doped film with an excitation wavelength of 485 nm.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  (a) Normalized EL spectra. (b) EQE versus the radiance of the devices. (c) J-R-V characteristics. (d) Normalized EL intensity (left) and driving voltage (right) of the device versus operating time.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

  Table 1.  Photophysical data for TPA-2Q-Pt.

  λema (nm)	τb (µs)	τc (µs)	Фpd (%)	kr e (105 s−1)	knr e (105 s−1)	Tdf (℃)
  735/711/755	0.49/0.72	1.4/1.6	15	1.1	6.1	356
  a In deaerated dichloromethane (10−5 mol/L, left), 5 wt% PMMA doped film (middle) and neat film (right), respectively. b In neat film after being aerated (left) and degassed (right). c In 5 wt% PMMA doped film after being aerated (left) and degassed (right). d Absolute photoluminescence quantum yield evaluated using an integrating sphere for the 5 wt% PMMA doped film after being degassed. e Calculated using kr = Ф/τ and knr = (1 – Ф)/τ. f The temperature at a weight loss of 5% under an N2 atmosphere.

  下载: 导出CSV

  Table 2.  Key device data obtained for selected NIR OLEDs.

  Concentrations	λEL, maxa (nm)	Rmaxb (mW sr−1 m−2)	EQEsc (%)	CIEx, yd
  3 wt%	730	74626	5.2/5.1/4.6/4.0	0.65, 0.32
  6 wt%	733	63308	4.5/4.4/4.1/3.5	0.70, 0.32
  9 wt%	737	61186	4.1/4.0/3.6/3.4	0.68, 0.28
  a Wavelength of the EL maximum. b Maximum radiance. c Maximum/@1000 mW sr−1 m−2/@5000 mW sr−1 m−2/@10000 mW sr−1 m−2. d Commission Internationalede L'Eclairage (CIE) coordinate @ EQEmax.

  下载: 导出CSV
•