English

• Hydrogen energy is regarded as the most potential clean energy in the 21^st century owing to its high combustion heat value and carbon-free emissions. Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution via water splitting represents one of the most promising routes for obtaining hydrogen energy [1, 2]. To achieve this target, it is required to develop low-cost, efficient, environmentally friendly and stable hydrogen evolution photocatalysts [3, 4]. Anatase titanium dioxide (TiO₂), one of the first-generation photocatalyst, has been well studied since 1972 for hydrogen production [5-9]. Many inorganic metal oxides and sulfides such as VO₂, Ga₂O₃, and MoS₂ were then developed for photocatalytic hydrogen production [10-12]. However, these photocatalysts can only be excited under ultraviolet or near-ultraviolet light that occupies only ~4% of the solar light [13, 14]. Photocatalysts driven by visible-light (the main part of the solar spectrum) are more promising candidate materials for hydrogen energy.

  Recently, polymeric materials have also received wide attention since they possess the merits of finely controllable chemical structures and electronic properties via synthetic protocols, which endow them with multiple redox potentials to enable various photocatalytic applications [15-18]. Conjugated polymers, of which the properties can be easily tuned via copolymerizing different monomers into conjugated backbones, have also been developed as efficient photocatalysts for visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution [19-21]. However, traditionally used conjugated polymers show linear structures with nonporous characteristics and low surface area. Effective photocatalysts are required to exhibit large surface areas, which can enhance the adsorption of reactants and offer substantial reactive sites. Moreover, large surface areas enable more light to be harvested and also possess continuous pore channels which facilitate the transfer of reactant molecules [22, 23].

  Conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs), featured with extended π-conjugation, high specific surface area, excellent physicochemical and photocatalytic stability, and tunable chemical structure and electronic properties, have received wide attention as polymeric photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution [24-28]. By controlling chemical structures, bandgaps, and morphologies, series of CMPs have been demonstrated for visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution [29-34]. However, most of the reported CMP materials possess a hydrophobic skeleton, which leads to a poor dispersion in water [35]. The correspondingly CMPs show defective interface between organic photocatalysts and water, which limits the performance of hydrogen evolution. In additions, the current synthetic routes of CMPs usually require precious metal catalysts and harsh reaction conditions [36].

  In this work, we present a simple metal-free approach to synthesize a series of pyridyl conjugated microporous polymers (PCMPs) via the Chichibabin pyridine reaction between aromatic aldehydes and ketones (Scheme 1). This new synthetic method can be performed at a mild temperature without using expensive metal catalysts, which offers a green route toward hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) photocatalysts. The incorporation of pyridyl nitrogen atoms can improve the wettability of CMPs at the molecular level. The introduction of nitrogen atoms can effectively improve the photo-generated carrier mobility in the system by promoting the rapid propagation of carriers in the π-conjugated structure. By adjusting the nitrogen content, the position and width of the polymer band gap can be changed to tune the photocatalytic activity [37]. Therefore, numerous nitrogen-containing porous polymers, such as covalent organic frameworks (COFs) [38-40], covalent triazine frameworks (CTFs) [41, 42], chelating conjugated polymers [43] and CMPs [44-46] have been designed for photocatalysts.

  Scheme 1

  

  Scheme 1.  Synthetic route to PCMPs network.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The chemical structure of the as-synthesized polymers was verified using solid-state ¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The solid-state ¹³C NMR spectra of PCMPs (Fig. 1a) show three peaks at ~154 ppm, ~147 ppm and ~135 ppm, which are ascribed to the pyridyl groups, and the peaks at ~126 ppm and ~120 ppm arise from the phenyl groups. Fig. 1b shows the FT-IR spectra of PCMPs and corresponding monomers. The peak at ~1600 cm⁻¹ can be attributed to the C=N bond of the pyridine rings, which indicates the completion of the cyclization reaction. The XRD patterns (Fig. 1c) of PCMPs show broad peaks of amorphous polymers at 2θ = 20°, being attributed to π-π interlayer stacking between benzene groups and pyridine groups.

  Figure 1

  

  Figure 1.  (a) Solid-state ¹³C CP/MAS NMR spectra, (b) FT-IR spectra, (c) powder XRD patterns, (d) XPS survey spectra, (e) C 1s core-level XPS spectra, and (f) N 1s core-level XPS spectra of PCMPs.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Fig. 1d shows the XPS survey spectra of PCMPs, which confirms the existence of C, N element being consistent with previous results [47]. The C 1s core-level XPS spectra (Fig. 1e) also confirm that two independent peaks at 284.6 eV and 285.4 eV represent C=C and C=N bonds, respectively. The N 1s core-level XPS spectra (Fig. 1f) show a single peak at ~398.7 eV owing to pyridyl N, which also indicates the successful synthesis of PCMPs. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) scans (Fig. S1 in Supporting information) demonstrated that the polymer started to decompose at 400 ℃, but still maintained 50%−60% at char yields at 1000 ℃, which proves the good thermal stability of 3D skeleton of PCMPs.

  The N₂ adsorption/desorption isotherms of PCMPs show a typical Ⅰ/Ⅳ type curve, and the adsorption amount of N₂ increased sharply at the low-pressure range (P/P₀ < 0.5), which indicates large amounts of microporous structures existed in as-synthesized polymers (Fig. 2a and Fig. S2 in Supporting information). The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area is up to 418 m²/g for m-PCMP. The pore size distribution of PCMPs is in the range of micropore. In addition, the results of CO₂ and N₂ adsorption of the PCMPs at 273 K and 298 K further demonstrated the porous structure of PCMPs were consistent with the above results (Figs. 2b and c).

  Figure 2

  

  Figure 2.  (a) N₂ adsorption/desorption isotherms, (b, c) CO₂ and N₂ adsorption/desorption isotherms of PCMPs. SEM, TEM and HRTEM images of (d-f) p-PCMP, (g-i) m-PCMP, and (j-l) m-NPCMP.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The morphologies of the PCMPs were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images (Figs. 2d-l). The morphology of the PCMPs obtained from different reaction monomers is similar, demonstrating the uniform sizes of nanoparticles. The particle size of m-PCMP is the largest with an avenge diameter of 30 nm, and the accumulation of particles forms mesopores and macropores. HR-TEM further proves that there are a large number of micropores in these three polymers, which is consistent with the results of N₂ adsorption/desorption curve test.

  The solid ultraviolet (UV) absorption spectra (Fig. 3a) show the light absorption ranges of PCMPs are similar (200–500 nm). The optical bandgaps estimated from the T_auc plot are 2.65 eV-2.71 eV (Fig. 3b) and the conduction band (CB) positions are −1.00 eV to −1.15 eV (Fig. 3c). The calculation results demonstrate that the bandgaps of PCMPs polymers are larger compared to the theoretical bandgaps of water splitting, which indicate that all polymers have sufficient bandgaps for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction, and are expected to be used as photocatalysis of water to produce hydrogen in the visible light range (Table S1 in Supporting informamtion).

  Figure 3

  

  Figure 3.  (a) UV–vis spectra, (b) corresponding T_auc plots, (c) photoluminescence emission spectra (λ_ex = 380 nm). H₂ production of PCMPs (d) under UV–vis light irradiation (λ > 320 nm), (e) under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm), and (f) time course of m-PCMP-P under UV–vis light irradiation (λ > 320 nm). Photocatalytic test conditions: 10 mg photocatalyst, 50 mL H₂O, 5 ml TEOA, 3 wt% Pt.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  The photocatalytic water splitting experiments were performed using PCMPs powders suspended in water with chloroplatinic acid hexahydrate (H₂PtCl₆·6H₂O) as the co-catalyst and triethanolamine (TEOA) as the hole sacrificial agent. Figs. 3d and e show the photocatalytic hydrogen production in the ultraviolet-visible range of PCMPs. The H₂ production rate of m-PCMP, p-PCMP and m-NPCMP under UV–vis light irradiation (λ > 320 nm) is 29.86 µmol/h, 25.93 µmol/h and 16.18 µmol/h, respectively, and 9.56 µmol/h, 4.72 µmol/h and 1.56 µmol/h under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm), respectively.

  These results indicate that the photocatalytic hydrogen producing activity is related to the molecular structure of polymers that the groups in different substitution positions of benzene rings make the differences inactivity. The polymers prepared using different aromatic ketone monomers would have different pore structures. Specifically, p-PCMP, formed by the deoxycyclization of para-aromatic aldehyde and para-aromatic ketone, shows relatively regular polymer structure with homogeneous pore size of micropores (~0.6 nm, Fig. S2). Due to the presence of excessive pyridine nitrogen atom, the steric hindrance of 2,6-diacetylpyridine was larger than para-aromatic ketone, and the pores formed were smaller after polymerization. The meta-aromatic ketone cyclized the polymer to produce pores with different pore sizes. From the pore size distribution curve, it could be seen a large number of micropores and mesopores, which means the polymer had excellent multi-stage pore structure.

  Moreover, the different chemical structure results in different electronic structure. In order to evaluate the light stability of the materials, m-PCMP was used for continuous photocatalytic hydrogen production for 50 h (λ > 320 nm), and vacuum degassed every 5 h as a cycle to determine its hydrogen production (Fig. 3f). The polymer exhibits excellent photocatalytic stability, and the photocatalytic hydrogen production rate of the polymer in each cycle was basically maintained at 30.00 µmol/h without significant attenuation. After 40 h of light irradiation, the photocatalytic activity decreased slightly, but still maintained a high hydrogen production capacity, and the photocatalyst could still maintain a high hydrogen production rate of 27.80 µmol/h in the last cycle. After the photocatalytic cycle experiment was completed, we performed an infrared spectrum and scanning electron microscope tests on the recovered samples. As shown in Fig. S3, the structure of the polymer did not change significantly, indicating that m-PCMP has excellent light stability and structural stability. In summary, the materials we prepared have excellent hydrogen production activity as photocatalysts, and the hydrogen production rate is higher than that of most organic porous material catalysts (Table S1).

  In conclusion, we have synthesized a series of photocatalysts that decompose water to produce hydrogen and discussed the influence of different reaction solvents on catalyst performance. The synthesized PCMPs have excellent porosity and photoelectric properties. The obtained PCMPs demonstrate good photocatalytic hydrogen production activity. Especially, due to the narrower bandgap and richer hierarchical pore structure, m-PCMPs show excellent photocatalytic activity in the ultraviolet-visible and visible light range, which the hydrogen production rate is as high as 29.86 and 9.56 µmol/h, respectively. The synthesis method we reported provides a new route to obtain high-efficiency organic semiconductor catalysts suitable for the field of photocatalysis.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  Acknowledgments

  This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52103024, 52073046, 51873036 and 51673039), the Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader (No. 21XD1420200), the Shanghai Shuguang Program (No. 19SG28), the Chang Jiang Scholar Program (No. Q2019152), the Shanghai Pujiang Talent Program (No. 20PJ1400600), the Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (Nos. 22ZR1401600 and 19ZR1470900), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2232021D-01), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Graduate Student Innovation Fund of Donghua University (No. CUSF-DH-D-2019024).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.04.038.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     J. Barber, Chem. Soc. Rev.38 (2009) 185–196. doi: 10.1039/B802262N

  2. [2]

     A.J. Carrillo, J. Gonzalez-Aguilar, M. Romero, J.M. Coronado, Chem. Rev. 119 (2019) 4777–4816. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00315

  3. [3]

     X. Zhang, H. Dong, X.J. Sun, et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6 (2018) 11563–11569. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01740

  4. [4]

     C. Sundaram, Y. Lei, D. Libo, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 8 (2019) 4178–4280.

  5. [5]

     A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature 238 (1972) 37–38. doi: 10.1038/238037a0

  6. [6]

     X. Chen, S. Shen, L. Guo, S.S. Mao, Chem. Rev. 110 (2010) 6503–6570. doi: 10.1021/cr1001645

  7. [7]

     L. Liu, X. Gu, Z. Ji, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 117 (2013) 18578–18587. doi: 10.1021/jp4064774

  8. [8]

     L. Liu, Z. Ji, W. Zou, et al., ACS Catal. 3 (2013) 2052–2061. doi: 10.1021/cs4002755

  9. [9]

     A. Kudo, Y. Miseki, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38 (2009) 253–278. doi: 10.1039/B800489G

  10. [10]

      X.B. Chen, S.H. Shen, L.J. Guo, S.S. Mao, Chem. Rev. 110 (2010) 6503–6570. doi: 10.1021/cr1001645

  11. [11]

      R.S. Sprick, J.X. Jiang, B. Bonillo, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 3265–3270. doi: 10.1021/ja511552k

  12. [12]

      G. Ye, Y. Gong, J. Lin, et al., Nano Lett. 16 (2016) 1097–1103. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04331

  13. [13]

      A. Fujishima, X.T. Zhang, D.A. Tryk, Surf. Sci. Rep. 63 (2008) 515–582. doi: 10.1016/j.surfrep.2008.10.001

  14. [14]

      A. Meng, L. Zhang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Adv. Mater. 31 (2019) 1807660. doi: 10.1002/adma.201807660

  15. [15]

      M.G. Schwab, M. Hamburger, X. Feng, et al., Chem. Commun. 46 (2010) 8932–8934. doi: 10.1039/c0cc04057f

  16. [16]

      M. Sachs, R.S. Sprick, D. Pearce, et al., Nat. Commun. 9 (2018) 4968. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07420-6

  17. [17]

      M. Aitchison, R.S. Sprick, A.I. Cooper, J. Mater. Chem. A 7 (2019) 2490–2496. doi: 10.1039/c8ta11383a

  18. [18]

      Z.A. Lan, G. Zhang, X. Chen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 10236–10240. doi: 10.1002/anie.201904904

  19. [19]

      S. Sprick, C.M. Aitchison, E. Berardo, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 6 (2018) 11994–12003. doi: 10.1039/C8TA04186E

  20. [20]

      Y. Wang, Y. Di, M. Antonietti, et al., Chem. Mater. 22 (2010) 5119–5121. doi: 10.1021/cm1019102

  21. [21]

      H. Yu, R. Shi, Y. Zhao, et al., Adv. Mater. 29 (2017) 1605148. doi: 10.1002/adma.201605148

  22. [22]

      J. Chen, C.L. Dong, D. Zhao, et al., Adv. Mater. 29 (2017) 1606198. doi: 10.1002/adma.201606198

  23. [23]

      G. Zhou, L.L. Zheng, D. Wang, et al., Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 4150–4153. doi: 10.1039/c9cc01161g

  24. [24]

      M. Luo, Q. Yang, K. Liu, H. Cao, H. Yan, Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 5829–5832. doi: 10.1039/c9cc02144b

  25. [25]

      Kuecken, A. Acharjya, L. Zhi, et al., Chem. Commun. 53 (2017) 5854–5857. doi: 10.1039/C7CC01827D

  26. [26]

      Z.A. Lan, Y. Fang, X. Chen, X. Wang, Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 7756–7759. doi: 10.1039/c9cc02966d

  27. [27]

      W. Huang, Q. He, Y. Hu, Y. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 131 (2019) 1–6.

  28. [28]

      K. Wang, L.M. Yang, X. Wang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 14149–14153. doi: 10.1002/anie.201708548

  29. [29]

      L. Guo, Y. Niu, H. Xu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 6 (2018) 19775–19781. doi: 10.1039/c8ta07391k

  30. [30]

      C.B. Meier, R.S. Sprick, A. Monti, et al., Polymer (Guildf)126 (2017) 283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.04.017

  31. [31]

      Y.S. Kochergin, D. Schwarz, A. Acharjya, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 14188–14192. doi: 10.1002/anie.201809702

  32. [32]

      Stegbauer, K. Schwinghammer, B.V. Lotsch, Chem. Sci. 5 (2014) 2789–2793. doi: 10.1039/C4SC00016A

  33. [33]

      S. Vyas, F. Haase, L. Stegbauer, et al., Nat. Commun. 6 (2015) 8508. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9508

  34. [34]

      X. Wang, L. Chen, S.Y. Chong, et al., Nat. Chem. 10 (2018) 1180. doi: 10.1038/s41557-018-0141-5

  35. [35]

      P. Pachfule, A. Acharjya, J.R.M. Roeser, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 1423–1427. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b11255

  36. [36]

      J.L. Sheng, H. Dong, X.B. Meng, et al., ChemCatChem 11 (2019) 2313–2319. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201900058

  37. [37]

      C. Bie, H. Yu, B. Cheng, et al., Adv. Mater. 33 (2021) 2003521 doi: 10.1002/adma.202003521

  38. [38]

      S.B.P. Thiruvengadam, S. Wei, W. Zhang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 11893–11900. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c04594

  39. [39]

      S. Bi, C. Yang, W. Zhang, et al., Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 2467. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10504-6

  40. [40]

      S. Bi, Z. Lan, S. Paasch, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 27 (2017) 1703146. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201703146

  41. [41]

      S. Zhang, G. Cheng, L. Guo, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 6007–6014. doi: 10.1002/anie.201914424

  42. [42]

      L. Guo, X. Wang, Z. Zhan, et al., Chem. Mater. 33 (2021) 1994–2003. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03716

  43. [43]

      L. Li, R.G. Hadt, S. Yao, et al., Chem. Mater. 28 (2016) 5394–5399. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01477

  44. [44]

      C. Yang, Z. Cheng, G. Divitini, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 9 (2021) 18674–19900. doi: 10.1039/D1TA90183D

  45. [45]

      Y. He, Z. Cheng, H. Zuo, C. Yan, Y. Liao, ChemElectroChem 7 (2020) 959–966. doi: 10.1002/celc.201901975

  46. [46]

      Q. Zeng, Z. Cheng, C. Yang, Y. He, N. Meng, C.F.J. Faul, Y. Liao, Chinese J. Polym. Sci., 39 (2021) 1004–1012. doi: 10.1007/s10118-021-2574-3

  47. [47]

      Z. Cheng, L. Wang, Y. He, et al., Polym. Chem. 11 (2020) 3393–3397. doi: 10.1039/d0py00249f

• 

  Scheme 1  Synthetic route to PCMPs network.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 1  (a) Solid-state ¹³C CP/MAS NMR spectra, (b) FT-IR spectra, (c) powder XRD patterns, (d) XPS survey spectra, (e) C 1s core-level XPS spectra, and (f) N 1s core-level XPS spectra of PCMPs.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 2  (a) N₂ adsorption/desorption isotherms, (b, c) CO₂ and N₂ adsorption/desorption isotherms of PCMPs. SEM, TEM and HRTEM images of (d-f) p-PCMP, (g-i) m-PCMP, and (j-l) m-NPCMP.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Figure 3  (a) UV–vis spectra, (b) corresponding T_auc plots, (c) photoluminescence emission spectra (λ_ex = 380 nm). H₂ production of PCMPs (d) under UV–vis light irradiation (λ > 320 nm), (e) under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm), and (f) time course of m-PCMP-P under UV–vis light irradiation (λ > 320 nm). Photocatalytic test conditions: 10 mg photocatalyst, 50 mL H₂O, 5 ml TEOA, 3 wt% Pt.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
•