English

• As attractive targets in organic synthesis, the chromones keep receiving extensive attention in synthetic method development [1–3]. In order to enhance the structural diversity of compounds featuring a chromone core, a plethora of synthetic protocols consisting of chromone ring construction and different other cascade chemical transformations have been established over the recent decade [4–11]. The notable advances in chromone synthesis, as expected, also have promoted the discovery of chromones possessing fantastic functions, including but not limited in biologically relevant lead compounds [12–14] and organic materials etc. [14–17]. Among the currently available protocols, the domino reactions consisting of a featured chromone annulation of o-hydroxyaryl enaminones and other different C—H functionalization transformation have been identified as the most prevalently investigated and employed tactic [18]. Especially over the last decade, the o-hydroxyphenyl enaminone-based chromone synthesis has received booming advances in terms of both reaction pathways and product diversity. By means of proper catalytic conditions, this typical chromone annulation takes place together with the formation of various other new chemical bonds in form of domino reactions, leading to the synthesis of chromones with C3-substituents such as alkyl and functionalized alkyl [19–26], perfluoroalkyl [27–29], aryl [30–31], alkenyl [32], alkynyl [33], chalcogen atoms [34–39], nitrogen [40–41] and various other carbon- and heteroatom-based functional structures [42–45].

  On the other hand, due to the significant role of trifluoromethylthio group in determining the functionality of organic molecules [46–49], the synthesis of trifluoromethylthiolated molecules has won highly extensive attention [50–53]. Unsurprisingly, the synthesis of trifluoromethylthiolated chromones has gained high interest of chemists. In 2014, Yang and Xiang [54] reported the synthesis of 3-trifluoromethylthiolated (3-CF₃S) chromones by employing AgSCF₃ as the source of SCF₃ group (Scheme 1A). To date, no other catalytic method enabling the synthesis of 3-(trifluoromethylthio) chromones with o-hydroxyphenyl enaminones is available. Accordingly, developing new methods, especially the ones without relying on expensive transition metal-catalyst or reagent for the synthesis of such chromone derivatives is currently of high demand [55–64]. Herein, upon our sustaining efforts in developing enaminone-based synthesis [65–71], we report the first method on the o-hydroxyphenyl enaminone-based synthesis of 3-(trifluoromethylthio) chromones by employing CF₃SO₂Na as a cheap CF₃S source. Besides, we also have realized the chemo-selective synthesis of 3-trifluoromethylsulfinyl chromones with identical substrates by simply modifying reaction conditions. Moreover, the 3-sulfinyl chromones which are not accessible by any previous synthetic efforts, have been easily furnished by our method with simple sodium sulfinates as the reaction partners (Scheme 1B).

  Scheme 1

  

  Scheme 1.  Known method for the synthesis of 3-(trifluoromethylthio) chromones with AgSCF₃ and this work.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Originally, the o-hydroxyphenyl enaminone 1a and CF₃SO₂Na (2a) were selected as starting materials for the potential synthesis of 3-(trifluoromethylthio) chromone 3a. By screening different reagents, the PBr₃ was found to be an applicable reagent for the synthesis of the target product 3a by acting as both coupling and reducing agent. To explore the proper conditions enabling the efficient synthesis of 3a, the reaction parameters, including the loading of 2a and PBr₃, the reaction medium, concentration, as well as the reaction temperature were optimized, respectively (Tables S1–S3 in Support information). The results indicated that the optimal result of 70% 3a was afforded by running the reaction in DMF at 0 ℃ to room temperature. The GC–MS analysis on the reaction residue from the optimal entry indicated no presence of CF₃SO- or CF₃SO₂-substituted chromone, documenting the fine stability of the 3a against aerobic oxidation.

  By employing the optimized conditions, the scope on the synthesis of CF₃S-functionalized chromones 3 was then investigated with various enaminones 1 as starting materials to react with 2. As outlined in Scheme 2, the synthesis of such functionalized chromones exhibited general tolerance to the functional group in the aryl ring of 1. The products 3a-3o were obtained with generally good to excellent yields. While electron withdrawing group (EWG) substituted substrates gave halo-atom or nitrophenyl-based products 3d, 3g-3j and 3n with 74%–82% yield, the equivalent electron donating group (EDG), such as alkyl or alkoxyl functionalized products were given with slightly lower yield (3b-3c and 3e-3f, Scheme 2). Additionally, fused biaryl (3n, Scheme 2) and linear biaryl (3o, Scheme 2) derived products were also afforded with practical results. When HCF₂SO₂Na was used as the reaction partner, the HCF₂S-functionalized product 3p was acquired with 65% yield. Further efforts by employing N-Boc-o-aminophenyl enaminone for the synthesis of corresponding CF₃S-functionalized quinoline-4-one was not succeeded under current conditions.

  Scheme 2

  

  Scheme 2.  Scope on the synthesis of 3-(trifluoromethylthio) chromones.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Subsequently, considering the variable chemical valence of sulfur atom, we assumed that it would be applicable to switch the chemo-selectivity of the reaction by providing trifluoromethyl-sulfinyl (SOCF₃) chromones with identical substrates. To avoid the over reduction to the sulfur center, simple POCl₃ was selected as the coupling reagent. Delightfully, we successfully realized the selective synthesis of 3-trifluoromethylsulfinyl chromone 4a via the reaction of 1a and 2. Analogously, the conditions for this transformation were optimized by comparing the effect of different parameters, by which the satisfactory result was acquired by running the reaction in DMF in the presence of 2.0 equiv. POCl₃ by stirring at 0 ℃ to room temperature (see Support information for details on condition optimization). On the basis of optimization, the scope for the selective 3-trifluoromethylsulfinyl chromones synthesis was also studied. The results provided by the experiments inarguably verified the high applicability of this method in the synthesis of such unprecedented 3-substituted chromones (Scheme 3).

  Scheme 3

  

  Scheme 3.  Scope on the synthesis of 3-perfluoroalkylsulfinyl chromones and 3-sulfinyl chromones. ^a Yield from 1 mmol-scale reaction.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  As shown by the results, the synthesis of 3-trifluorometylsulfinyl chromones 4a-4q were provided with good to excellent yields, and the single crystal analysis on 4a (CCDC: 2311321) confirmed the product structure. Specifically, the enaminones bearing no substitution or with EDG in the phenyl ring reacted with 2 to give the products with excellent yield (4a-4c, 4e-4f and 4k, Scheme 3). Equivalent reactions with enaminones containing EWG in the phenyl, on the contrary, provided product with lower yield (4d, 4g and 4h-4j, Scheme 3). Moreover, products with disubstituted phenyl (4l, Scheme 3), fused aryl (4m, Scheme 3) and biaryl (4n-4o, Scheme 3) were also synthesized with satisfactory results. The method, notably, was also proven to be applicable for the synthesis of difluoromethylsulfinyl chromone with fine efficiency (4r, Scheme 3). More interestingly, the method was successfully expanded to the synthesis of aryl/alkyl-based 3-sulfinyl chromones 5. While such sulfur group-functionalized chromones had not been previously synthesized, the present method displayed attractive synthetic application by donating products 5a-5e with generally good yield (Scheme 3). Moreover, the CF₃SO-functionalized quinoline-4-one 5f could be efficiently synthesized by using N-Boc-o-aminophenyl enamione 1′ as substrate, demonstrating the highly general tolerance of this method in the synthesis of novel sulfur groups functionalized chromones in the C3 site. Notably, GC–MS analysis on the reactions both for the synthesis of both 3a and 4a showed no formation of 3-trifluoromethyl chromone [27].

  Following the examination on the switchable synthesis of both products 3 and 4, the synthetic application of these compounds was also primarily investigated (Scheme 4). First, employing the hydrazine hydrate 6 or guanidine hydrochloride salt 8 as reaction partner of compound 3a enabled the efficient synthesis of CF₃S-funcitonalized pyrazole 7 and pyrimidine 9 by simple heating, respectively. On the other hand, subjecting compound 4a to m-CPBA allowed the formation of trifluoromethylsulfonyl chromone 10 with near quantitative yield. However, employing m-CPBA with enaminone 1a and CF₃SO₂Na in DMF in one-step operation did not provide compound 10.

  Scheme 4

  

  Scheme 4.  Transformation of the synthesized products 3 and 4.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  To probe the reaction mechanism, some control experiments were executed. First, for both the synthesis of CF₃S- and CF₃SO-substituted chromones, the parallel entries in the presence of free radical scavenger (FRS) were performed. The results showed that FRS such as BHT or DPE did not inhibit the formation of product 3a or 4a (Scheme 5a). Successively, the reaction sequence was probed by employing chromone 11 as substrate to react with 2, but neither 3a nor 4a was formed under corresponding conditions (Scheme 5b), suggesting that the chromone annulation took place after the C—H functionalization.

  Scheme 5

  

  Scheme 5.  Control experiments.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  Based on these results and known examples involving phosphanes as deoxygenating reagents [72,73], the mechanisms for the reactions providing different chromone products are proposed (Scheme 6). For the reactions mediated by PBr₃, the CF₃SONa first couples PBr₃ to generate species A. The nucleophilic substitution of the enaminone's α-carbon to the S-site in A gives sulfinylated enaminone C and releases compound B. Further, the nucleophilic substitution of the O-site in C to the P—Br bond in B affords intermediate D with the assistance of the electron donating effect from the amino group. Subsequently, the P to O electron pair transfer in D takes place to enable the break of the S—O bond to provide the trifluoromethylthiolated enaminone E. After that, the classical chromone annulation in the o-hydroxyphenyl enaminone yields the CF₃S-functionalized chromones 3 by eliminating HNMe₂. On the other hand, for the POCl₃ mediated formation of sulfinyl chromones, the incorporation of POCl₃ and CF₃SONa happens initially to give sulfinyl chloride F. This species couples enaminone 1 in the α-site to generate sulfinylated iminium G by acting as an electrophile. The nucleophilic annulation and a subsequent amine elimination would then provide 3-trifluoromethylsulfinyl chromones 4. The sulfinyl chromones 5 are formed following similar mechanism.

  Scheme 6

  

  Scheme 6.  The proposed reaction mechanisms.

  DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

  In conclusion, by means of the featured C—H functionalization and chromone annulation cascade on o-hydroxyaryl enaminones, we have attained the first transition metal-free synthesis of 3-(trifluoromethylthio) chromones. The main tactic is the successful application of trivalent phosphine PBr₃ as reductive coupling reagent. More interestingly, the chemo-selectivity could be switched for the synthesis of 3-trifluoromethylsulfinyl chromones by using pentavalent POCl₃ as coupling reagent. Besides the synthesis of 3-trifluoromethylsulfinyl chromones, the synthesis of 3-aryl/alkylsulfinyl chromones with corresponding aryl/alkyl sulfinate as reaction partners has also been achieved. These results significantly expanded the application scope of enaminones in the synthesis of chromone derivatives. The transition metal-free conditions as well as the sulfur-group diversity in the C3-site of the chromone products consists of the major advantages of the work.

  Declaration of competing interest

  The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  Acknowledgment

  This work is financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22161022).

  Supplementary materials

  Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109683.

  
  
• 1. [1]

     S. Tian, T. Luo, Y. Zhu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 307–3082. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.07.042

  2. [2]

     M. Mohadeszadeh, M. Iranshahi, Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 17 (2017) 1377–1397.

  3. [3]

     M. Fan, W. Yang, M. He, et al., Eur. J. Med. Chem. 237 (2022) 114397. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114397

  4. [4]

     L. Cai, X. Zhu, J. Chen, et al., Org. Chem. Front. 6 (2019) 3688–3692. doi: 10.1039/C9QO00830F

  5. [5]

     J. Xiao, Z. Ai, X. Li, et al., Green Synth. Catal. 3 (2022) 198–201. doi: 10.1016/j.gresc.2021.12.003

  6. [6]

     J.R. Dhanaji, P. Samtha, S. Raju, Chem. Commun. 59 (2023) 2648–2651. doi: 10.1039/D2CC05992D

  7. [7]

     B. Hasimujiang, J. Zhu, W. Xu, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 365 (2023) 2929–2935. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202300512

  8. [8]

     X. Li, Y. Li, J. Yang, et al., Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 7216–7221. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c03017

  9. [9]

     J. Liu, D. Ba, Y. Chen, et al., Chem. Commun. 56 (2020) 4078–4081. doi: 10.1039/C9CC09460A

  10. [10]

      A. St-Gelais, J. Alsarraf, J. Legault, Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 7424–7428. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b03148

  11. [11]

      Y.F. Ye, F. Li, J.L. Chen, et al., J. Org. Chem. 87 (2022) 14005–14015. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c01637

  12. [12]

      M. Kim, M. Truss, P.P. Paggare, et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 30 (2020) 127511. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2020.127511

  13. [13]

      M. Kim, M. Truss, P.P. Pagare, et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 30 (2020) 127511.

  14. [14]

      M. Miliutina, S.A. Ejaz, V.O. Iaroshenko, et al., Org. Biomol. Chem. 4 (2016) 495–502.

  15. [15]

      A. Das, G. Das, New J. Chem. 46 (2022) 19002–19008. doi: 10.1039/D2NJ04115D

  16. [16]

      R. Kouser, A. Rehman, S.M.A. Abidi, et al., J. Mol. Struct. 1256 (2022) 132533. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.132533

  17. [17]

      H. Gómez-Machuca, C. Quiroga-Compano, C. Jullian, et al., ChemistrySelect 7 (2022) e202202581. doi: 10.1002/slct.202202581

  18. [18]

      L. Fu, J.P. Wan, Asian J. Org. Chem. 8 (2019) 767–776. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.201900196

  19. [19]

      P.N. Bagle, M.V. Mane, S.P. Sancheti, et al., Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 335–339. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b03989

  20. [20]

      Y.F. Lin, C. Fong, W.L. Peng, et al., J. Org. Chem. 82 (2017) 10855–10865. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b01626

  21. [21]

      J. Joussot, A. Schoenfelder, L. Larquetoux, et al., Synthesis 48 (2016) 3364–3372. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562513

  22. [22]

      M. Zhang, Z. Liu, L. Chen, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 364 (2022) 4440–4446. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202201154

  23. [23]

      W. Zhao, Z. He, X. Yang, et al., J. Org. Chem. 88 (2023) 13634–13644. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.3c01339

  24. [24]

      K. Wen, Y. Li, Q. Gao, et al., J. Org. Chem. 87 (2022) 9270–9281. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c01005

  25. [25]

      S. Pan, M. Song, L. Zuo, et al., J. Org. Chem. 88 (2023) 5586–5596. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.3c00093

  26. [26]

      Z.Q. Zhu, J.Y. Hu, Z.B. Xie, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 364 (2022) 2169–2173. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202200304

  27. [27]

      Q. Yu, Y. Liu, J.P. Wan, Org. Chem. Front. 7 (2020) 2770–2775. doi: 10.1039/D0QO00855A

  28. [28]

      H. Xiang, Q. Zhao, Z. Tang, et al., Org. Lett. 19 (2017) 146–149. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03441

  29. [29]

      H. Gao, B. Hu, W. Dong, et al., ACS Omega 2 (2017) 3168–3174. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00383

  30. [30]

      J.P. Wan, Z. Tu, Y. Wang, Chem. Eur. J. 25 (2019) 6907–6910. doi: 10.1002/chem.201901025

  31. [31]

      S. Mkrtchyan, M. Jakubczyk, S. Lanka, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 364 (2022) 3512–3521. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202200645

  32. [32]

      L. Fu, Z. Xu, J.P. Wan, et al., Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 9518–9523. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c03548

  33. [33]

      M.O. Akram, S. Bera, N.T. Patil, Chem. Commun. 52 (2016) 12306–12309. doi: 10.1039/C6CC07119H

  34. [34]

      T. Zhang, W. Yao, J.P. Wan, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 363 (2021) 4811–4816. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202100617

  35. [35]

      Y.X. Xu, S.Y. Wu, Z.B. Dong, J. Org. Chem. 87 (2022) 15350–15357. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c01924

  36. [36]

      B. Zhang, Z. Fu, H. Yang, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 364 (2022) 1602–1606. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202200089

  37. [37]

      G.S. Sorabad, M.R. Maddani, Asian J. Org. Chem. 8 (2019) 1336–1343. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.201900402

  38. [38]

      Y. Guo, Y. Xiang, L. Wei, et al., Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 3971–3974. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01536

  39. [39]

      H.Y. Liu, J.R. Zhang, G.B. Huang, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 363 (2021) 1656–1661. doi: 10.1002/adsc.202001474

  40. [40]

      Z.W. Wang, Y. Zheng, Y.E. Qian, et al., J. Org. Chem. 87 (2022) 1477–1484. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.1c02796

  41. [41]

      T. Luo, J.P. Wan, Y. Liu, Org. Chem. Front. 7 (2020) 1107–1112. doi: 10.1039/D0QO00065E

  42. [42]

      S. Mkrtchyan, V.B. Purohit, V.O. Iaroshenko, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 11 (2023) 13877–13884. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c03467

  43. [43]

      Y. Lin, J.P. Wan, Y. Liu, J. Org. Chem. 88 (2023) 4017–4023. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.3c00206

  44. [44]

      Y. Lin, J. Jin, C. Wang, et al., J. Org. Chem. 86 (2021) 12378–12385. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.1c01347

  45. [45]

      Q.L. Zhao, P.J. Xia, L. Zheng, et al., Tetrahedron 76 (2020) 130833. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2019.130833

  46. [46]

      G. Landelle, A. Panossian, F.R. Leroux, Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 14 (2014) 941–951. doi: 10.2174/1568026614666140202210016

  47. [47]

      N. Thota, P. Makam, K.K. Rajbongshi, et al., ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 10 (2019) 1457–1461. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00285

  48. [48]

      M. Diaferia, F. Veronesi, G. Morganti, et al., Parasitol. Res. 112 (2013) 163–168.

  49. [49]

      J. Gregorc, N. Lensen, G. Chaume, et al., J. Org. Chem. 88 (2023) 13169–13177. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.3c01373

  50. [50]

      C. Xu, S. Wang, Q. Shen, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 10 (2022) 6889–6899. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c01006

  51. [51]

      X. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108045. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108045

  52. [52]

      X.H. Yang, D. Chang, R. Zhao, et al., Asian J. Org. Chem. 10 (2021) 61–73. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.202000575

  53. [53]

      G.L. Xie, S.H. Jia, X. Shen, et al., J. Fluorine Chem. 235 (2020) 109524. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2020.109524

  54. [54]

      H. Xiang, C. Yang, Org. Lett. 16 (2014) 5686–5689. doi: 10.1021/ol502751k

  55. [55]

      T.A. Kizhakkan, K.M.S. Ajay, D. Basvaraja, et al., Org. Chem. Front. 9 (2022) 5306–5357. doi: 10.1039/D2QO00278G

  56. [56]

      D. Chen, J. Jiang, J.P. Wan, Chin. J. Chem. 40 (2022) 2582–2594. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202200347

  57. [57]

      Y. Li, D. Shen, H. Zhang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108048. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108048

  58. [58]

      Z. Xu, J. Wan, Y. Liu, Chin. J. Org. Chem. 43 (2023) 2425–2446. doi: 10.6023/cjoc202212035

  59. [59]

      M.S. Kang, J.Y.X. Khoo, Z. Jia, et al., Green Synth. Catal. 3 (2022) 309–316. doi: 10.1016/j.gresc.2022.09.002

  60. [60]

      Y. Lv, H. Cui, N. Meng, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 97–114. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.06.068

  61. [61]

      Y.H. Lu, S.Y. Mu, H.X. Li, et al., Green Chem. 25 (2023) 5539–5542. doi: 10.1039/D2GC04906F

  62. [62]

      Y.H. Lu, Z.T. Zhang, H.Y. Wu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108036. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108036

  63. [63]

      J. Jiang, K.L. Wang, X. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108699. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108699

  64. [64]

      H.T. Ji, K.L. Wang, W.T. Ouyang, et al., Green Chem. 25 (2023) 7983–7987. doi: 10.1039/D3GC02575F

  65. [65]

      Y. Han, L. Zhou, C. Wang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 108977. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108977

  66. [66]

      H. Guo, Y. Liu, J.P. Wan, Green Synth. Catal. (2024), doi: 10.1016/j.gresc.2023.10.004.

  67. [67]

      Y. Guo, Y. Liu, J.-P. Wan, Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 855–858. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.003

  68. [68]

      D. Cao, C. Wang, J.-P. Wan, et al., Chem. Commun. 59 (2023) 6383–6386. doi: 10.1039/D3CC01427D

  69. [69]

      S. Tian, Y. Liu, C. Wan, et al., J. Org. Chem. 88 (2023) 2433–2442. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c02858

  70. [70]

      W. Song, Y. Liu, N. Yan, et al., Org. Lett. 25 (2023) 2139–2144. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c00636

  71. [71]

      J. Ye, Y. Liu, J. Luo, et al., Org. Lett. 25 (2023) 8451–8456. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c03353

  72. [72]

      X. Zhao, A. Wei, B. Yang, et al., J. Org. Chem. 82 (2017) 9175–9181. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b01226

  73. [73]

      L. Zheng, X. Qiu, Z. Xiao, et al., J. Org. Chem. 88 (2023) 7518–7524. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.3c00342

• 

  Scheme 1  Known method for the synthesis of 3-(trifluoromethylthio) chromones with AgSCF₃ and this work.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 2  Scope on the synthesis of 3-(trifluoromethylthio) chromones.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 3  Scope on the synthesis of 3-perfluoroalkylsulfinyl chromones and 3-sulfinyl chromones. ^a Yield from 1 mmol-scale reaction.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 4  Transformation of the synthesized products 3 and 4.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 5  Control experiments.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
  

  Scheme 6  The proposed reaction mechanisms.

  下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片
•