Electron-transporting boron-doped polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Facile synthesis and heteroatom doping positions-modulated optoelectronic properties

Tingting Huang Zhuanlong Ding Hao Liu Ping-An Chen Longfeng Zhao Yuanyuan Hu Yifan Yao Kun Yang Zebing Zeng

Citation:  Tingting Huang, Zhuanlong Ding, Hao Liu, Ping-An Chen, Longfeng Zhao, Yuanyuan Hu, Yifan Yao, Kun Yang, Zebing Zeng. Electron-transporting boron-doped polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Facile synthesis and heteroatom doping positions-modulated optoelectronic properties[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024, 35(4): 109117. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109117 shu

Electron-transporting boron-doped polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Facile synthesis and heteroatom doping positions-modulated optoelectronic properties

English

  • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have attracted increasing attentions over the past decade due to their intriguing physiochemical properties and enormous potential for widespread applications in the fields of optoelectronic devices such as organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), organic photovoltaics (OPVs), and organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) [16]. Among the various rationales for designing new PAHs and modulating their properties, the incorporation of main group elements, i.e., the so-called heteroatom doping, represents one of the most powerful approach due to its unique capability of simultaneously fine-tuning the electronic structures and intermolecular noncovalent interactions of materials [79]. Specifically, due to its vacant p orbitals, boron atom can act concurrently as π-electron acceptors and Lewis acid and thus has been widely adopted for constructing novel boron-containing PAHs with suppressed lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMOs) energy levels, tuned aromaticity/antiaromaticity, intensive fluorescent emission, and robust Lewis acidity [10,11]. Therefore, miscellaneous B-doped PAHs with different boron doping numbers and positions have been prepared via sophisticated synthetic methodologies, among which the seminal examples include Yamaguchi's structurally constrained B-heterotriangulene derivatives, Piers and Tovar's seven-membered borepin-based ladder polycycles, Wanger and Wang's B-doped linear-fused high-order oligoacenes, and so on [1222]. However, despite these elegant demonstrations, presently the material library of B-doped PAHs is severely limited, especially when compared to those based on other heteroatoms such as sulfur and nitrogen, thus severely hampering their further practical applications [10,2328].

    Among the manifold properties of B-containing π-conjugated materials that stemming from boron doping, the inherent electron-accepting capability is particularly appealing as it can potentially yield highly sought-after n-type semiconductors that hold broad applications in various optoelectronic devices. For instance, the B, N co-doped π-functional materials, as exemplified by the boron–nitrogen coordination bond-based conjugated polymers, have been widely applied in n-type OFETs/organic thermoelectrics and OPVs [29,30]. However, for the small-molecular B-doped PAHs, currently the electron transporting properties and related applications of the majority of these materials have been largely overlooked, especially for tricoordinate boron-containing ones that usually possessing highly planar backbone configurations [31,32]. In addition, compared to the extensively explored B, N-doped PAHs [3335], the investigations on the PAHs upon co-doping of boron and other atoms such as oxygen and sulfur have also been considerably neglected, thus leading to the influences of such co-doping on the physiochemical and charge transporting properties of the corresponding materials remains elusive [36,37].

    In this context, herein, we presented the facile synthesis and systematic characterizations of two electron transporting B2S2-embedded diindenopyrenes molecules, namely Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2, which feature isomeric boron/sulfur embedding positions. The investigation of their structure-property relationship revealed that the heteroatom orientations not only bring significantly changes on their various physicochemical properties such as optical absorption/emission and fluoride-activated photophysical responses, but also largely affect their solid-state packing modes. In addition, benefitted from their lower-lying LUMO energy levels, both B2S2 derivatives were exploited in solution-processed OFETs, showing promising unipolar n-type charge carrier mobilities up to 1.5 × 10−3 cm2 V−1 s−1, which ranks top amongst the few n-type semiconductors based on strictly three-coordinate boron-doped PAHs [38]. Our work highlighted the importance of heteroatom orientation patterns on modulating the physicochemical and charge transport properties of novel PAHs.

    Scheme 1 depicted the three-step synthetic routes to the target doubly B-doped PAH molecules Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2. Starting from commercially available 1,5-naphthalenebis(trifluoromethanesulfonate) (1) and 1,4-dibromonaphthalene (2), the dibromo compounds 3 and 4 were synthesized via standard palladium-catalyzed Suzuki coupling reaction and a sequential bromination step in good yields of 86% and 81%, respectively. Notably, due to their lack of solubilizing side chains, both 3 and 4 can be obtained upon direct precipitation from ethyl acetate with high purities instead of by tedious column chromatography procedures, which obviously should be beneficial for the facile and large-scale preparation of our final targeted PAHs. Both 3 and 4 were then subjected to a one-pot double-fold lithiation/trans-metalation and intramolecular electrophilic C—H borylation reactions upon treatment with mesityl magnesium bromide to afford Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2 in overall yields of 39% and 41%, respectively, accompanying with excellent materials stability against air, water, and silica gels which allows them to be handled without special precautions. The two B-doped PAHs were fully characterized with NMR, HR-MS, and single crystallographic studies (vide infra), except for the 13C NMR characterization of Anti-B2S2 due to its extremely poor solubility in common deuterated organic solvents. The 11B NMR spectra of both compounds showed broad peaks at around 32-35 ppm, confirming the presence of three-coordinated boron atoms in their molecular architectures.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1.  Synthesis of Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2, Reagents and conditions: (a) 2-Benzothienylboronic acid, Pd(PPh3)4, K2CO3 (2 mol/L in H2O), dioxane, 90 ℃, 12 h; (b) Br2, DCM, r.t., 0.5 h; (c) ⅰ) n-BuLi (2.5 mol/L in hexane), toluene, 0 ℃, 0.5 h; ⅱ) BBr3 (1 mol/L in hexane), 0 ℃ - reflux, toluene, overnight; ⅲ) MesMgBr (1 mol/L in THF), toluene, r.t., 1 h.

    The optical properties of the as-prepared Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2 were first characterized by UV–vis spectroscopy. As illustrated in Fig. 1a, both compounds showed typically vibronic split bands in dilute solutions ascribing to their highly rigid conjugated backbone structures [39,40]. Anti-B2S2 exhibited a yellow color in solution featuring a maximum absorption wavelength (λmax) of 492 nm with a shoulder at 462 nm, which can be assigned to HOMO-1→LUMO and HOMO-2→LUMO transitions, respectively, as suggested by time-dependent density-functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations (Fig. S1 and Table S1 in Supporting information). In contrast, Syn-B2S2 exhibited a wide absorption band with a red-shifted low energy absorption band peaking at 616 nm together with a λAbsmax of 492 nm in solution state, corresponding to the HOMO→LUMO and HOMO-3→LUMO transitions, respectively (Fig. S2 and Table S2 in Supporting information). Interestingly, it was also found that while a fluorescent emission band approaching the NIR region featuring a maximum at 680 nm was found for Syn-B2S2 in its toluene solution with a fluorescence quantum yield (ΦF) of 8.0% and lifetime (τ) of 4.0 ns, no such fluorescence was found for that of Anti-B2S2. This fluorescence quenching of Anti-B2S2 can be plausibly explained by the argument that its S0→S1 transition is symmetry forbidden as evidenced by the fact that the TD-DFT calculated oscillator strength (f) of the HOMO→LUMO transitions being 0 (Tables S1 and S2) [41,42]. In contrary, the S0→S1 transition of syn-isomer was symmetry allowed as suggested by its modest TD-DFT-calculated oscillator strength of 0.1665, which thus explained well for the observed fluorescence emission in the corresponding solution. Clearly, these results have revealed the substantial modulation effect of heteroatom doping patterns on the optical properties of the two B-doped PAH materials.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  (a) UV–vis absorption of Anti-B2S2 in toluene (10−4 mol/L), UV–vis absorption and normalized emission spectra of Syn-B2S2 in toluene (10−4 mol/L). Photo insets illustrate the sample under ambient light and 365 nm irradiation. (b) Cyclic voltammogram of Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2 with 0.1 mol/L TBA-PF6 as supporting electrolyte, Ag/AgCl as reference electrode, glassy carbon electrode as working electrode, Pt wire as the counter electrode.

    Cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were then carried out to investigate the electrochemical properties of Anti- and Syn-B2S2 in dichloromethane solutions at room temperature. As shown in Fig. 1b, two reversible reduction waves were found for both PAHs with onset potentials of the first/second reduction of −0.99/−1.41 V and −0.93/−1.38 V vs. Fc/Fc+ for Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2, respectively. These values, to the best of our knowledge, are amongst the mildest reduction potentials reported for boron-doped PAHs [7,10,43], thus reflecting the high electron deficiency of both molecules. Indeed, based on their first reduction onset potentials, substantial deep-lying LUMO energy levels of < −3.8 eV were obtained for both molecules (Anti-B2S2: −3.81 eV, Syn-B2S2: −3.87 eV), which can be ascribed to the presence of two strong electron-accepting tricoordinate boron atoms. Meanwhile, despite the doping of S atoms has been widely reported for enabling p-type characteristics with low ionization energy [44], no discernible oxidization waves were observed for both PAHs up to an electrochemical voltage of 2.0 V, which correlated well with the low-lying HOMO levels of two doped PAHs (Anti-B2S2: −5.90 eV, Syn-B2S2: −5.71 eV) as calculated on the basis of their optical bandgaps and LUMO energy levels (Table 1). Therefore, the simultaneously low-lying LUMO and HOMO levels of Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2 might imply the potential of those two PAHs as unipolar n-type (electron-transporting) materials in optoelectronic devices.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  Summary of the photophysical properties of Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2.
    DownLoad: CSV

    To gain insight of the electronic structures and frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs) of two compounds, DFT calculations were further performed using the Gauss 09 program at the B3LYP/6-31G (d, p) level. As depicted in Fig. 2, Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2 exhibited similar distributions of LUMOs, which were mainly located at the pyrenes, sulfur atoms and boron atoms of the conjugated skeletons, thus resulting in quite similar LUMO energy levels of −3.53 eV and −3.54 eV for Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2, respectively, both of which were significantly lower than those of their non-doped parent diindenopyrenes by ~0.7 eV [45]. However, for the HOMOs, while that of Anti-B2S2 exhibited a nearly full delocalization of orbitals over its π-conjugated backbone, a shrink distribution of HOMOs was found for Syn-B2S2, showing that no orbital electron clouds were delocalized onto the two sulfur atoms and one of the benzene rings in its central naphthalene core. Accordingly, substantial discrepant HOMO energy levels of −5.78 and −5.61 eV were observed for Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2, respectively, which again, were significantly lower than those of their non-doped parent diindenopyrenes by ~0.9 eV [45]. The lower HOMO energy level of Anti-B2S2 against that of Syn-B2S2 might be attributed to the engagement of electron-deficient boron atoms in the corresponding HOMO orbitals. Therefore, the calculated band gap of two molecules were 2.25 and 2.07 eV for Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2, respectively, agreeing well with the trend as observed for those extracted from their optical absorption spectra. To evaluate the effect of boron-doping on their electronic structures, nucleus-independent chemical shifts (NICS) values and the anisotropy of the induced current density (ACID) plots were also calculated, showing that all the boron-containing hexacycles for both doped PAHs have positive NICS(1)zz values (~+16.9 ppm) and counter-clockwise ring current (Fig. S5 in Supporting information), which thus revealed that the introduction of the boron atom have rendered antiaromaticity to the corresponding hexacycles of the PAHs.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  Frontier molecular orbitals of Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2 from DFT calculations at B3LYP/6-31G(d, p) level.

    Single crystals of Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2 that suitable for X-ray crystallography studies were successfully obtained by diffusing of n-hexane into their dichloromethane solutions at −20 ℃. Both B-doped compounds exhibited highly planar conjugated backbones with their triaryl boron atoms retaining trigonal planar geometry and sums of bond angles around boron atoms approaching 360° (Figs. 3a and b). For the packing structures, however, due to the presence of two bulky pedant mesityl groups which were found to be aligned perpendicularly to the π-conjugated backbones, relatively less ordered but significantly distinct stacking modes were observed for two PAH molecules in crystalline states. For instance, Anti-B2S2 molecules adopt a layered-stacking structure to form slipped π stacks along the c-axis with an inter-layer distance of 3.56 Å, accompanied by two cocrystallized dichloromethane molecules contacting with the π-skeletons via hydrogen bonding interactions (Figs. 3c and Fig. S6 in Supporting information). In contrast, the syn isomer Syn-B2S2 exhibited a sandwich herringbone stacking mode to form a tetramer-like assemblies-based 3D superstructures [46], which is mainly driven by C—C contacts between the peripheral phenyl rings and the benzothiophene rings as well as S—C contacts between the Syn-B2S2 core and the benzothiophene rings (Fig. 3d and Fig. S7 in Supporting information). Clearly, these results indicate that the embedding orientations of boron and sulfur atoms in the π-scaffolds have significantly influenced the molecular packing modes of the corresponding PAHs molecules in the solid-state.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  Single-crystal structures and packing of Anti-B2S2 (a, c) and Syn-B2S2 (b, d). Mes group and hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarity in top view, the blue-, red- and green-colored atoms represent S, B and Cl atoms.

    Given the low HOMO/LUMO energy levels of Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2, we envisioned that both B-doped molecules might serve as a class of unipolar electron-transporting semiconductors. Therefore, to evaluate their charge transport properties, solution-processed thin film-based organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) were then fabricated with a Glass/Cr/Cu/OSC/Cytop/Al configuration based on the two doped PAHs. As shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. S8 (Supporting information), while the Anti-B2S2-based devices exhibited a relatively poor electron mobility (µe) of 3.5 × 105 cm2 V−1 s−1, a ~40-fold increased µe of 1.5 × 103 cm2 V−1 s−1 was found for devices of Syn-B2S2, thus suggesting the higher efficiency of charge transport for the syn isomer in the thin-film states, which might be associated with its relatively higher film crystallinity as seen from their X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns (Fig. S9a in Supporting information). Note, despite these values are only modest and the tetra-coordinated boron-based molecules can give much higher mobilities [47,48], these values have ranked at the favorable positions among the µes results for the few tricoordinate boron-containing PAHs as reported as n-type semiconductors in OFETs [38,4951], especially when considering the relatively amorphous nature of both compounds in thin-film states as evidenced by their atomic force microscopy (AFM) images (Fig. S9b in Supporting information) and XRD results.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  Transfer (a) and output (b) characteristics of Syn-B2S2 based bottom-gate top-contact OFETs (IDS = source-drain current, VGS = gate voltage, VDS = source-drain voltage channel length/width: 40/1000 (µm).

    It is well known that the tricoordinate boron-containing π-conjugated systems could act as Lewis acids to accommodate electron lone pairs from Lewis bases, thus resulting in significant variations of physiochemical property which can render them potentials in applications such as chemosensor. Therefore, as a class of typical triarylboron derivatives, a Lewis acid-base titration experiment with fluorine ions was carried out for both Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2 in order to investigate their Lewis acidic characteristics. As shown in Fig. 5a, upon treatment with tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) solution, both B, S-embedded PAHs exhibited both significantly changes that can be readily observed both spectroscopically and with naked eyes. For instance, for Anti-B2S2, while its long-wavelength absorption band at 480 nm was gradually diminished, new absorption peaks were simultaneously emerged in the short wavelength region of 350–450 nm, thus resulting in an obvious solution color change from yellow to light green after the addition of TBAF, which should be attributed to the alterations of molecular electronic structures upon the binding of boron atoms with fluoride ions. Interestingly, unlike most of organoboron compounds that showing quenching of fluorescence after the fluoride treatment [29,39,52], a fluorescence turn-on phenomenon was found for the anti-isomer upon fluoride titration, thus implying the good potential of this materials as fluoride-activated fluorescent sensors. For Syn-B2S2, while significant colour change of from brown to orangish yellow was observed upon the adding of excessive TBAF, blue-shifted absorptions with similar peak diminishing and appearing phenomena were also generated together with two isosbestic points at 548 and 467 nm (Fig. 5b), thus implying that a possible transformation between this molecule with one single fluoride-bound product upon fluoride treatment [53]. Like the absorption, blue-shifted fluorescence from red to brownish yellow was further observed for Syn-B2S2, which represents a typical phenomenon of conjugated boron derivatives upon fluoride treatment. Thus, these results have clearly revealed the great capability of the changing of heteroatom doping positions for modulating the physicochemical properties of the resulting π-electron systems upon Lewis base treatments.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  UV–vis spectra of (a) Anti-B2S2 (1 × 10−4 mol/L in toluene) and (b) Syn-B2S2 (1.0 × 10−4 mol/L in toluene) upon the addition of TBAF. Photo insets illustrate sample appearance before and after addition of fluoride under ambient light and 365 nm irradiation.

    In summary, we have successfully synthesized two isomeric doubly B-doped PAHs with varied boron and sulfur orientation patterns via a facile synthetic approach. Through changing the orientations of boron/sulfur heteroatoms in their π-skeletons, the two PAHs exhibited distinct absorption/emission properties, modulated FMO energy levels, and significantly different intermolecular packing structures in crystalline states, and discrepant Lewis-base triggered photophysical responses. Most importantly, benefitting from their LUMO energy levels that arising from the doping of boron atoms, unipolar n-type semiconductors characteristics were observed for both PAHs in solution-processed OFETs with a highest electron mobility up to 1.5 × 103 cm2 V−1 s−1. For the few n-type semiconductors based on strictly three-coordinate boron-doped PAHs, Syn-B2S2 has relatively high electron mobility values in thin film state. This work shed some insights into how heteroatoms orientations of (hetero)PAHs affect their photophysical, electrochemical, and molecular stacking properties. Given the currently limited structural diversity of boron/sulfur-PAHs and the insufficient synthetic endeavours toward novel skeletons, the current work might open a new avenue to promote further development of boron/sulfur-embedded conjugated materials for optoelectronic applications.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    The authors thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22375059, 22005133, 51922039 and 52273174), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (No. RCJC20200714114434015), and Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (No. 2020RC5033), and National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2020YFC1807302) for financial support.

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109117.


    1. [1]

      J.E. Anthony, Chem. Rev. 106 (2006) 5028–5048. doi: 10.1021/cr050966z

    2. [2]

      A. Narita, X.Y. Wang, X. Feng, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 6616–6643. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00183H

    3. [3]

      Y. Sun, S. Gao, F. Lei, et al., Acc. Chem. Res. 48 (2015) 3–12. doi: 10.1021/ar500164g

    4. [4]

      J. Chen, K. Yang, X. Zhou, et al., Chem. Asian. J. 13 (2018) 2587–2600. doi: 10.1002/asia.201800860

    5. [5]

      N. Liang, D. Meng, Z. Wang, Acc. Chem. Res. 54 (2021) 961–975. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00677

    6. [6]

      Y. Gu, Z. Qiu, K. Müllen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 11499–11524. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c02491

    7. [7]

      M. Hirai, N. Tanaka, M. Sakai, et al., Chem. Rev. 119 (2019) 8291–8331. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00637

    8. [8]

      X. Wang, X. Yao, A. Narita, et al., Acc. Chem. Res. 52 (2019) 2491–2505. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00322

    9. [9]

      A. Borissov, Y. Maurya, L. Moshniaha, et al., Chem. Rev. 122 (2022) 565–788. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00449

    10. [10]

      E.V. Grotthuss, A. John, T. Kaese, et al., Asian J. Org. Chem. 7 (2018) 37–53. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.201700495

    11. [11]

      S.K. Mellerup, S. Wang, Trends. Chem. 1 (2019) 77–89. doi: 10.1016/j.trechm.2019.01.003

    12. [12]

      S. Saito, K. Matsuo, S. Yamaguchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 9130–9133. doi: 10.1021/ja3036042

    13. [13]

      L.G. Mercier, W.E. Piers, M. Parvez, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (2009) 6108–6111. doi: 10.1002/anie.200902803

    14. [14]

      D.R. Levine, M.A. Siegler, J.D. Tovar, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 7132–7139. doi: 10.1021/ja502644e

    15. [15]

      S. Kirschner, J. Mewes, M. Bolte, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 23 (2017) 5104–5116. doi: 10.1002/chem.201700056

    16. [16]

      H. Wei, Y. Liu, T.Y. Gopalakrishna, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 15760–15767. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b07375

    17. [17]

      L. Li, Y. Gao, C. Dou, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 1193–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.11.018

    18. [18]

      G. Liao, X. Chen, Y. Qiao, Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 5836–5841. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c01983

    19. [19]

      P. Zhang, J. Zeng, F. Zhuang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 23313–23319. doi: 10.1002/anie.202108519

    20. [20]

      J. Guo, K. Zhang, Y. Wang, et al., Chem. Sci. 14 (2023) 4158–4165. doi: 10.1039/D3SC00342F

    21. [21]

      J. Guo, Z. Li, X. Tian, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202217470. doi: 10.1002/anie.202217470

    22. [22]

      Y. Liu, L. Yuan, J. Guo, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202306911. doi: 10.1002/anie.202306911

    23. [23]

      B. Li, W. Peng, S. Luo, et al., Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 1417–1421. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b00152

    24. [24]

      Y. Wang, S. Qiu, S. Xie, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 2169–2176. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b13884

    25. [25]

      F. Kang, J. Yanga, Q. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. C 10 (2022) 2475–2493. doi: 10.1039/D1TC04340D

    26. [26]

      T. Luo, Y. Wang, J. Hao, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202214653. doi: 10.1002/anie.202214653

    27. [27]

      Z. Li, Y. Tang, J. Guo, et al., Chem 9 (2023) 1281–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2023.01.019

    28. [28]

      K. Zhang, J. Guo, H. Liu, et al., Chem. Commun. 59 (2023) 4947–4950. doi: 10.1039/D3CC00729D

    29. [29]

      R. Zhao, J. Liu, L. Wang, Acc. Chem. Res. 53 (2020) 1557–1567. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00281

    30. [30]

      J. Miao, Y. Wang, J. Liu, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 51 (2022) 153–187. doi: 10.1039/D1CS00974E

    31. [31]

      Sun Z, S. Li, Z. Liu, Chin. Chem. Lett. 27 (2016) 1131–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2016.06.007

    32. [32]

      S.K. Mellerupab, S. Wang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 48 (2019) 3537–3549. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00153K

    33. [33]

      X. Wang, J. Wang, J. Pei, Chem. Eur. J. 21 (2015) 3528–3539. doi: 10.1002/chem.201405627

    34. [34]

      J. Wang, J. Pei, Chin. Chem. Lett. 27 (2016) 1139–1146. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2016.06.014

    35. [35]

      C.R. McConnell, S.Y. Liu, Chem. Soc. Rev. 48 (2019) 3436–3453. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00218A

    36. [36]

      T. Jin, L. Kunze, S. Breimaier, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 13704–13716. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c04516

    37. [37]

      Y. Chang, Y. Wu, X. Wang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 451 (2023) 138545–138554. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.138545

    38. [38]

      J.M. Farrell, C. Mützel, D. Bialas, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 9096–9104. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b04675

    39. [39]

      J. Zhang, F. Liu, Z. Sun, et al., Chem. Commun. 54 (2018) 8178–8181. doi: 10.1039/C8CC01748D

    40. [40]

      K. Yang, X. Zhang, A. Harbuzaru, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 4329–4340. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b12683

    41. [41]

      H. Kubo, T. Hirose, K. Matsuda, Org. Lett. 19 (2017) 1776–1779. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b00548

    42. [42]

      Yi. Wu, S. Ying, L. Su, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 10736–10742. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c00794

    43. [43]

      C. Mützel, J.M. Farrell, K. Shoyama, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202115746. doi: 10.1002/anie.202115746

    44. [44]

      T. Okamoto, C.P. Yu, C. Mitsui, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 9083–9096. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b10450

    45. [45]

      D. Hibi, K. Kitabayashi, K. Fujita, et al., J. Org. Chem. 81 (2016) 3735–3743. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b00389

    46. [46]

      S. Fratini, M. Nikolka, A. Salleo, et al., Nat. Mater. 19 (2020) 491–502. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-0647-2

    47. [47]

      Y. Min, C. Dou, H. Tian, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 2000–2004. doi: 10.1002/anie.201712986

    48. [48]

      Y. Min, C. Dou, D. Liu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 17015–17021. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b09640

    49. [49]

      K. Matsuo, S. Saito, S. Yamaguchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 12580–12583. doi: 10.1021/ja506980p

    50. [50]

      K. Matsuo, S. Saito, S. Yamaguchi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 11984–11988. doi: 10.1002/anie.201605221

    51. [51]

      T. Kushida, S. Shirai, N. Ando, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 14336–14339. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b05471

    52. [52]

      Z. Zhou, A. Wakamiya, T. Kushida, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 4529–4532. doi: 10.1021/ja211944q

    53. [53]

      M. Lepeltier, O. Lukoyanova, A. Jacobson, et al., Chem. Commun. 46 (2010) 7007–7009. doi: 10.1039/c0cc01963a

  • Scheme 1  Synthesis of Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2, Reagents and conditions: (a) 2-Benzothienylboronic acid, Pd(PPh3)4, K2CO3 (2 mol/L in H2O), dioxane, 90 ℃, 12 h; (b) Br2, DCM, r.t., 0.5 h; (c) ⅰ) n-BuLi (2.5 mol/L in hexane), toluene, 0 ℃, 0.5 h; ⅱ) BBr3 (1 mol/L in hexane), 0 ℃ - reflux, toluene, overnight; ⅲ) MesMgBr (1 mol/L in THF), toluene, r.t., 1 h.

    Figure 1  (a) UV–vis absorption of Anti-B2S2 in toluene (10−4 mol/L), UV–vis absorption and normalized emission spectra of Syn-B2S2 in toluene (10−4 mol/L). Photo insets illustrate the sample under ambient light and 365 nm irradiation. (b) Cyclic voltammogram of Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2 with 0.1 mol/L TBA-PF6 as supporting electrolyte, Ag/AgCl as reference electrode, glassy carbon electrode as working electrode, Pt wire as the counter electrode.

    Figure 2  Frontier molecular orbitals of Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2 from DFT calculations at B3LYP/6-31G(d, p) level.

    Figure 3  Single-crystal structures and packing of Anti-B2S2 (a, c) and Syn-B2S2 (b, d). Mes group and hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarity in top view, the blue-, red- and green-colored atoms represent S, B and Cl atoms.

    Figure 4  Transfer (a) and output (b) characteristics of Syn-B2S2 based bottom-gate top-contact OFETs (IDS = source-drain current, VGS = gate voltage, VDS = source-drain voltage channel length/width: 40/1000 (µm).

    Figure 5  UV–vis spectra of (a) Anti-B2S2 (1 × 10−4 mol/L in toluene) and (b) Syn-B2S2 (1.0 × 10−4 mol/L in toluene) upon the addition of TBAF. Photo insets illustrate sample appearance before and after addition of fluoride under ambient light and 365 nm irradiation.

    Table 1.  Summary of the photophysical properties of Anti-B2S2 and Syn-B2S2.

    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  7
  • 文章访问数:  646
  • HTML全文浏览量:  27
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2024-04-15
  • 收稿日期:  2023-07-04
  • 接受日期:  2023-09-17
  • 修回日期:  2023-09-13
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-09-22
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章