English

Chemical Kinetic Model for the Combustion of the Green Propellant of the Nitrous Oxide Fuel Blend

• ZHENG Dong ^{1, ,} ,
• XIONG Pengfei ^2, ,
• ZHONG Beijing ^3,

• 1.

  School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P. R. China

• 2.

  Airbreathing Hypersonic Technology Research Center, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan Province, P. R. China

• 3.

  School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P. R. China

Corresponding author: ZHENG Dong, Email: zhengd11@yeah.net; Tel.: +86-28-87602926

• Received Date: 18 December 2018
  Accepted Date: 01 January 2019
  Revised Date: 01 January 2019
  Available Online: 15 November 2019
• Fund Project:

  The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51606212) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (2682017CX035)

Abstract: In order to meet high-performance propulsion system requirements for aerospace technology and severe future restrictions on hydrazine use, research on non-toxic, high-performance, and low-cost propulsion technology is urgently needed. The N₂O-C₂ hydrocarbon monopropellant NOFBX (Nitrous Oxide Fuel Blend) provides significant benefits for meeting these criteria and has become a focus of increased research in recent years. In this study, a chemical kinetic model for NOFBX combustion that integrates the reduced C₂ sub-mechanism, the N₂O sub-mechanism in the literature, and the N₂O/CH species reaction mechanism has been developed. The present mechanism consists of 52 species and 325 elementary reactions. For better predictions of ignition and combustion characteristics, the kinetic parameters of the sensitive reactions with comparatively high rate constant uncertainties have been revised. The present model has been validated against published experimental data, including flow reactor results on N₂O/H₂O/N₂ mixture decomposition, shock tube ignition delay times on N₂O/C₂ hydrocarbons diluted with N₂ or Ar mixtures, heat flux of flat flame laminar flame speeds on N₂O/C₂H₂ diluted with N₂ mixtures, and Bunsen flame laminar flame speeds on N₂O/C₂H₄ diluted with N₂ mixtures. Additionally, this study compares the new model to other published small hydrocarbon fuel kinetic models with a NO_x sub-mechanism. The experimental validations show that the present model accurately captures the nitrous oxide decomposition process and precisely predicts N₂O, O₂, NO, and NO₂ vital species concentration distributions. For all N₂O-C₂ hydrocarbon fuel systems (ethane-, ethylene-, and acetylene-nitrous oxide), the ignition delay times predicted by the present model are in good agreement with the experimental data. Furthermore, at a wider range of initial temperatures (1100-1700 K), initial pressures (0.1-1.6 MPa), and equivalence ratios (0.5-2.0) for the ignition delay times of ethylene-nitrous oxide, the present model exhibits improved predictions of experimental data. For the laminar flame speeds of N₂O-C₂H₂ and N₂O-C₂H₄ mixtures, the present model generally exhibits satisfactory predictions of the experimental data over the whole range of equivalence ratios (0.6-2.0). However, at initial pressure 0.1 MPa and equivalence ratios of 1.0-1.6 for N₂O-C₂H₄ laminar flame speeds, the present model slightly underestimates experimental data. Considering the much higher uncertainty of the measured laminar flame speeds by the Bunsen flame method, this discrepancy is acceptable. Due to the small scale, full experimental validations and good applicability, the present model can be used to further research on multi-dimensional combustion simulation in NOFBX engine combustors.

Key words:
• Nitrous
•  /  Small hydrocarbons
•  /  Chemical mechanism
•  /  Ignition delay time
•  /  Green propellant

• 1. [1]

     Gohardani, A. S.; Stanojev, J.; Demairé, A.; Anflo, K.; Persson, M.; Wingborg, N.; Nilsson, C. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2014, 71 (Supplement C), 128. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.08.001

  2. [2]

     朱成财, 韩伟, 于忻立, 单世群, 史雪梅.火箭推进, 2016, 42 (2), 79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9374.2016.02.015Zhu, C. C.; Han, W.; Yu, X. L.; Shan S. Q.; Shi, X. M. J. Rocket Propul. 2016, 42 (2), 79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9374.2016.02.015

  3. [3]

     贺芳, 方涛, 李亚裕, 米镇涛.火炸药学报, 2006, 29 (4), 54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2006.04.015He, F.; Fang, T.; Li, Y. Y.; Mi, Z. T. Chin. J. Expl. Prop. 2006, 29 (4), 54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2006.04.015

  4. [4]

     巴延涛, 侯凌云, 毛晓芳, 汪凤山.物理化学学报, 2014, 30, 1042. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201404093Ba, Y. T.; Hou, L. Y.; Mao, X. F.; Wang, F. S. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2014, 30, 1042. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201404093

  5. [5]

     田均均, 张庆华.含能材料, 2014, 5, 580. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2014.05.001Tian, J. J.; Zhang, Q. H. Chin. J. Energ. Mater. 2014, 5, 580. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2014.05.001

  6. [6]

     刘晓伟.火箭推进, 2001, 1, 56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9374.2001.01.011Liu, X. W. J. Rocket Propul. 2001, 1, 56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9374.2001.01.011

  7. [7]

     宋长青, 徐万武, 张家奇, 陈健.火箭推进, 2014, 40 (2), 7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9374.2014.02.002Song, C. Q.; Xu, W. W.; Zhang, J. Q.; Chen, J. J. Rocket Propul. 2014, 40 (2), 7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9374.2014.02.002

  8. [8]

     Taylor, R. Safety and Performance Advantages of Nitrous Oxide Fuel Blends (NOFBX) Propellants for Manned and Unmanned Spaceflight Applications, Proc. the IAASS Conference A Safer Space for a Safer World, Versaille, France, 2011, (ESA SP-699, January 2012).

  9. [9]

     Parker, W. G.; Wolfhard, H. G. Symp. (Int.) Combust. 1953, 4, 420. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(53)80058-5

  10. [10]

      Aldous, K. M.; Bailey, B. W.; Rankin, J. M. Anal. Chem. 1972, 44, 191. doi: 10.1021/ac60309a036

  11. [11]

      Powell, O. A.; Papas, P.; Dreyer, C. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2009, 181, 917. doi: 10.1080/00102200902817066

  12. [12]

      Naumann, C.; Kick, T.; Methling, T. Green Propellant Substituting Hydrazine: Investigation of Ignition Delay Time and Laminar Flame Speed of Ethene/Dinitrogen Oxide Mixtures. European Combustion Meeting 26th. Boston, MA, USA, 2017.

  13. [13]

      Mével, R.; Shepherd, J. E. Shock Waves. 2015, 25, 217. doi: 10.1007/s00193-014-0509-4

  14. [14]

      Deng, F.; Pan, Y.; Sun, W.; Yang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Z. Energy & Fuels 2017, 31, 14116. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01425

  15. [15]

      Konnov, A. A. Detailed Reaction Mechanism for Small Hydrocarbons Combustion. Release 0.5 (2000) http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~akonnov/ (accessed Feb 11, 2009).

  16. [16]

      Dagaut, P.; Nicolle, A. Combust. Flame 2005, 140, 161. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.11.003

  17. [17]

      Smith, G. P.; Golden, D. M.; Frenklach, M.; Moriarty, N. W.; Eiteneer, B.; Goldenberg, M.; Bowman, C. T.; Hanson, R. K. GRI-mech release 3.0. http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri/ (accessed Jun 4, 2018).

  18. [18]

      Metcalfe, W. K.; Burke, S. M.; Ahmed, S. S.; Curran, H. J. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2013, 45, 638. doi: 10.1002/kin.20802

  19. [19]

      Powell, O. A.; Papas, P.; Dreyer, C. B. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2010, 182, 252. doi: 10.1080/00102200903357724

  20. [20]

      Wang, H.; You, X.; Joshi, A. V.; Davis, S. G.; Laskin, A.; Egolfopoulos, F.; Law, C. K. USC Mech Version Ⅱ. http://ignis.usc.edu/USC_Mech_Ⅱ.htm, May 2007 (accessed Jun 4, 2018).

  21. [21]

      Wang, Q. D. Energy & Fuels 2013, 27, 4021. doi: 10.1021/ef4007774

  22. [22]

      Marshall, P.; Ko, T.; Fontijn, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 1922. doi: 10.1021/j100342a045

  23. [23]

      Konnov, A. A. Combust. Flame 2009, 156, 2093. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.03.016

  24. [24]

      Allen, M. T.; Yetter, R. A.; Dryer, F. L. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1995, 27, 883. doi: 10.1002/kin.550270906

  25. [25]

      Meagher, N. E.; Anderson, W. R. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 6013. doi: 10.1021/jp994471n

  26. [26]

      Mével, R.; Javoy, S.; Lafosse, F.; Chaumeix, N.; Dupré, G.; Paillard, C. E. P. Combust. Inst. 2009, 32, 359. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.054

  27. [27]

      Zhang, Y.; Mathieu, O.; Petersen, E. L.; Bourque, G.; Curran, H. J. Combust. Flame 2017, 182, 122. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.03.019

  28. [28]

      Giménez-López, J.; Alzueta, M. U.; Rasmussen, C. T.; Marshall, P.; Glarborg, P. P. Combust. Inst. 2011, 33, 449. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.098

  29. [29]

      郑东, 钟北京.物理化学学报, 2012, 28, 2029. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201207042Zheng, D.; Zhong, B. J. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2012, 28, 2029. doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201207042

  30. [30]

      Kee, R. J.; Rupley, F. M.; Miller, J. A. CHEMKIN Release 4.1, Reaction Design: San Diego, CA, USA. 2006.

•