Effect of preparation parameters on the catalytic performance of hydrothermally synthesized Co3O4 in the decomposition of N2O

He-jian LI Li ZHENG Tian-qi ZHAO Xiu-feng XU

Citation:  LI He-jian, ZHENG Li, ZHAO Tian-qi, XU Xiu-feng. Effect of preparation parameters on the catalytic performance of hydrothermally synthesized Co3O4 in the decomposition of N2O[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2018, 46(6): 717-724. shu

水热合成Co3O4的制备参数调变及其催化分解N2O性能

    通讯作者: 徐秀峰, xxf@ytu.edu.cn
摘要: 以十六烷基三甲基溴化胺(CTAB)为模板剂,通过调变CTAB浓度水热合成了氧化钴前驱体,焙烧制得棒状形貌的Co3O4,在其表面浸渍K2CO3溶液制得K改性的Co3O4催化剂,用于N2O分解。用X射线衍射(XRD)、N2物理吸附(BET)、扫描电镜(SEM)、X射线光电子能谱(XPS)、H2程序升温还原(H2-TPR)和O2程序升温脱附(O2-TPD)等技术对催化剂进行了表征,考察了CTAB/钴及尿素/钴物质的量比等制备参数对Co3O4催化分解N2O活性的影响。结果表明,CTAB浓度为0.05 mol/L、CTAB/钴离子物质的量比为1、尿素/钴离子物质的量比为4时,所制备的Co3O4催化剂具有较高的N2O分解活性,而K改性可以进一步提升其催化性能。K改性的Co3O4在有氧有水气氛中400℃下进行N2O分解反应,50 h后N2O转化率仍保持在91%以上。

English

  • Nitrous oxide (N2O), as one of the greenhouse gases that were limited by the Kyoto protocol, has a global warming potential (GWP) of 310 and lifetime of 120 years in the atmosphere. In addition, N2O is also harmful to the ozone layer; if disposed to the atmosphere, it may cause great harm to our ecological environment. The production of nitric and adipic acid contributes mostly to the anthropogenic source of N2O. The decomposition of N2O to non-toxic and harmless N2 and O2 is a simple and practical method to reduce the N2O emission. Various catalysts were reported for the N2O decomposition, including supported noble metals[1-3], ion-exchanged zeolites[4-7], and transition metal oxides[8-10], among them, the Co3O4-based catalysts have been widely studied[11-16]. It was also observed in our previous work that the Co3O4 catalyst prepared by precipitation was highly active in the decomposition of N2O[17].

    To enhance the performance of Co3O4-based catalysts in N2O decomposition, in this work, Co3O4 was hydrothermally synthesized by using hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) as a template. It was reported that with the increase of CTAB concentration in aqueous solution, CTAB may be present in the form of monomers, pre-micelles, spherical, rod, and layered micelles; the first and second critical micelle concentrations (CMC) were 0.00089 and 0.021 mol/L, respectively, as measured by Liu et al[18]. If the CTAB concentration was higher than the second CMC, rod micelles were formed and cobaltosic oxide precursors were then produced. The Co3O4 catalysts were then prepared by calcining the cobaltosic oxide precursors, which was further modified with K by impregnation with K2CO3 solution and used in the decomposition of N2O under the atmosphere containing oxygen and steam. The effect of preparation parameters such as CTAB concentration, molar ratio of CTAB to cobalt, molar ratio of urea to cobalt, and K modification on the catalytic activity of Co3O4 was then investigated.

    Appropriate amounts of Co(NO3)2·6H2O, urea, and CTAB was added into 50 mL deionized water; the mixture was stirred under ultrasonic irradiation for 10 min and then transferred to a 100 mL Teflon-sealed autoclave. The autoclave was then heated to 120 ℃ under rotation and held at this temperature for 6 h. The precipitant obtained was washed with deionized water, dried at 60 ℃ for 6 h, and then calcinated at 400 ℃ for 2 h. In this way, three series of cobaltosic oxides were prepared: the first one is denoted as Co3O4(CTAB-x), which is obtained with a CTAB/cobalt molar ratio of 1, a urea/cobalt molar ratio of 4, and a CTAB concentration of x (x = 0, 0.01, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05, and 0.06, in mol/L); the second one is expressed as Co3O4(CTAB/Co-y), prepared with 0.05 mol/L CTAB solution, a urea/cobalt molar ratio of 4, and a CTAB/cobalt molar ratio of y (y = 0.83, 1, 1.1, 1.3); the third one is expressed as Co3O4(urea/Co-z), synthesized with 0.05 mol/L CTAB solution, a CTAB/cobalt molar ratio of 1, and a urea/cobalt molar ratio of z (z = 3, 4, 5).

    To prepare the K-modified Co3O4 catalyst with a K/Co molar ratio of 0.02 (0.02K/Co3O4), the Co3O4 catalyst prepared by using 0.05 mol/L CTAB solution, with a CTAB to cobalt molar ratio of 1 and a urea to cobalt molar ratio of 4 was then impregnated with K2CO3 solution at room temperature for 24 h, dried at 60 ℃ for 12 h, and then calcined at 400 ℃ for 2 h.

    The decomposition of N2O was carried out in a fixed-bed reactor; 0.5 g catalyst was used for each test. Unless otherwise stated, the reactant feed consisted of 1% N2O and balanced argon, with a total flow rate of 150 mL/min. The effluent stream was analyzed by a gas chromatography (GC-920, Shanghai Haixin) equipped with a Porapak Q column and a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). In the case of oxygen atmosphere, the feed contained 2% O2 besides 1% N2O, whereas in the case of oxygen and steam atmosphere, the feed bore 8.2% H2O, besides 1% N2O and 2% O2.

    The initial activity was expressed by the conversion of N2O measured after reaction at given temperature for 30 min. To test the catalytic stability of 0.02 K/Co3O4, the reaction was conducted at 400 ℃ for 50 h.

    X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Shimadzu powder diffractometer (XRD-6100) with Cu Kα radiation and graphite monochromator at 40 kV and 30 mA.

    Specific surface area was measured by nitrogen physisorption apparatus (NOVA3000, Quantachrome) and calculated by BET equation. Prior to the measurement, the catalyst samples were pre-treated at 300 ℃ for 2 h to remove any impurities; the nitrogen adsorption and desorption were performed at -196 ℃ and room temperature, respectively.

    Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were taken on Hitachi S-4800; the catalyst samples were coated by using an ion sputter with platinum (E-1045, Hitachi) in order to improve their electric conductivity.

    X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) of cobalt element were recorded in an ESCALAB250 spectrometer using Al Kα radiation with pass energy of 20 eV. The charging effect was corrected by referencing C 1s peak centered at 284.6 eV.

    Temperature-programmed reduction by hydrogen (H2-TPR) was carried out on a chemical adsorption instrument (PCA-1200, Beijing Builder). Prior to each measurement, 80 mg catalyst was pre-treated in argon at 400 ℃ for 30 min and then cooled naturally to room temperature. Subsequently, the catalyst was exposed to 10% H2/Ar with a flow rate of 20 mL/min and heated from room temperature to 800 ℃ with a ramp of 10 ℃/min. The hydrogen consumption was detected by a TCD.

    Temperature programmed desorption of oxygen (O2-TPD) were also performed on the PCA-1200 chemical adsorption apparatus. 100 mg catalyst was first exposed to O2 at 120 ℃ for 30 min; after cooling to ambient temperature, it was then heated in helium from room temperature to 700 ℃ at a ramp of 10 ℃/min, during which the desorbed oxygen was measured by the TCD.

    A series of Co3O4 catalysts were first synthesized by changing the concentration of CTAB solution. As revealed by the XRD patterns shown in Figure 1, the Co3O4 catalysts have a spinel structure.

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  XRD patterns of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentrations

    a: Co3O4(CTAB-0); b: Co3O4(CTAB-0.01); c: Co3O4(CTAB-0.03); d: Co3O4(CTAB-0.05); e: Co3O4(CTAB-0.06)

    Table 1 illustrates that their BET surface area increases with an increase in CTAB concentration till 0.05 mol/L and then decreases with a further increase in CTAB concentration (e.g. Co3O4(CTAB-0.06)). The SEM images shown in Figure 2 suggest that Co3O4 prepared without using CTAB is in irregular particles. Irregular particles still appear with a low CTAB concentration (e.g. ≤ 0.01 mol/L). However, the Co3O4 catalysts prepared with 0.03-0.06 mol/L CTAB solution take the rod morphology.

    Table 1

    Table 1.  BET surface area of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentration
    下载: 导出CSV
    Catalyst BET surface area A/(m2·g-1)
    Co3O4(CTAB-0) 21.1
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.01) 42.2
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.03) 47.2
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.05) 50.3
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.06) 27.8

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  SEM images of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentration

    (a): Co3O4(CTAB-0); (b): Co3O4(CTAB-0.01); (c): Co3O4(CTAB-0.03); (d): Co3O4(CTAB-0.05); (e): Co3O4(CTAB-0.06)

    The conversion of N2O over various Co3O4 catalysts is displayed in Figure 3, which indicates that the Co3O4(CTAB-0.05) catalyst is most active in N2O decomposition. The reaction rate constants (k) can be derived by assuming the first order kinetics[19, 20]:

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  N2O conversions over various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentration

    $ x = 1-\exp \left( {-k{V_{{\rm{bed}}}}/F} \right) $

    (1)

    where x is the N2O conversion, Vbed is the catalyst bed volume, and F is the volumetric reactant flow rate.

    The calculated rate coefficient (k), apparent activation energy (Ea) and pre-exponential factor (A) are then given in Table 2. Obviously, the Co3O4(CTAB-0.05) catalyst with higher activity has a lower apparent activation energy. Meanwhile, the values of Ea and A change in the same direction, that is, lnA = 3.53 + 0.159Ea, indicating that there is a dynamic compensation effect between Ea and A.

    Table 2

    Table 2.  Kinetic data for N2O decomposition over various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentration
    下载: 导出CSV
    Catalyst k/s-1 Ea/(kJ·mol-1) lnA
    300 ℃ 325 ℃ 350 ℃ 375 ℃ 400 ℃
    Co3O4(CTAB-0) - - 1.96 3.77 6.55 84.2 16.9
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.01) 0.75 0.91 2.45 4.02 6.55 74.5 15.2
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.03) 1.01 1.87 3.53 5.70 7.30 65.4 13.8
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.05) 1.33 2.45 4.40 7.50 11.50 69.8 14.9
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.06) 0.75 1.42 2.86 5.39 7.71 77.1 15.9

    Concerning the N2O decomposition mechanism, it was reported that N2O was first adsorbed on the catalyst surface and N-O bond was then broken; after that, two adsorbed oxygen atoms reacted to produce one oxygen molecule, which was then desorbed from the catalyst surface[21]. The reaction cycle over Co3O4 may follow the formula:

    $ {{\rm{N}}_2}{\rm{O}} + {\rm{C}}{{\rm{o}}^{2 + }} \to {{\rm{N}}_2} + {\rm{C}}{{\rm{o}}^{3 + }}-{{\rm{O}}^-} $

    (2)

    $ 2{\rm{C}}{{\rm{o}}^{3 + }}-{{\rm{O}}^-} \to {{\rm{O}}_2} + 2{\rm{C}}{{\rm{o}}^{2 + }} $

    (3)

    where the desorption of oxygen species may be the controlling step.

    Figure 4 shows the XPS spectra of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentration. The binding energy of Co3+ 2p3/2 electrons on Co3O4(CTAB-0), Co3O4(CTAB-0.01), and Co3O4(CTAB-0.03) is about 782.2 eV, whereas that on Co3O4(CTAB-0.05) and Co3O4(CTAB-0.06) shifts about 0.1-0.2 eV to a lower value, indicating the Co3+-O- bond in Co3O4(CTAB-0.05) and Co3O4(CTAB-0.06) is weakened. As suggested by the second step of above mechanism, the weakened Co3+-O- bond in the (CTAB-0.05) and Co3O4(CTAB-0.06) catalysts is beneficial to the removal of oxygen species and the whole reaction cycle.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  XPS spectra of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentration

    a: Co3O4(CTAB-0); b: Co3O4(CTAB-0.01); c: Co3O4(CTAB-0.03); d: Co3O4(CTAB-0.05); e: Co3O4(CTAB-0.06)

    To extend the second step in above mechanism, it is assumed that two adsorbed oxygen atoms (Co3+-O-) produced by the dissocation of N2O molecules react with each other, forming one oxygen molecule O22- (i.e. Co3+-O-O-Co3+), which is then desorbed from the catalyst surface to regenerate the active Co2+ species:

    $ 2{\rm{C}}{{\rm{o}}^{3 + }}-{{\rm{O}}^-} \to {\rm{C}}{{\rm{o}}^{3 + }}-{\rm{O}} - {\rm{O}} - {\rm{C}}{{\rm{o}}^3} \to {{\rm{O}}_2} + 2{\rm{C}}{{\rm{o}}^{2 + }} $

    (4)

    O2-TPD is an effective method to characterize the interaction between oxygen species and catalyst surface. As shown in Figure 5, the oxygen desorbed in the O2-TPD profiles at 100-270 ℃ is assigned to the oxygen adsorbed on catalysts surface, whereas that desorbed at 330-420 ℃ is from the surface lattice oxygen. Obviously, the peak temperatures for oxygen desorption on Co3O4(CTAB-0.05) are 221.8 and 375.6 ℃, which are lower than those on other catalysts, indicating that the oxygen species on Co3O4(CTAB-0.05) are more easily desorbed, consistent with its higher activity.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  O2-TPD profiles of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentration

    a: Co3O4(CTAB-0); b: Co3O4(CTAB-0.01); c: Co3O4(CTAB-0.03); d: Co3O4(CTAB-0.05); e: Co3O4(CTAB-0.06)

    The effect of CTAB/cobalt and urea/cobalt molar ratios on the catalytic activity of Co3O4 was also considered. By changing the CTAB/cobalt molar ratio, it was found that the surface areas of Co3O4(CTAB/Co-0.83), Co3O4(CTAB/Co-1), Co3O4(CTAB/Co-1.1), and Co3O4(CTAB/Co-1.3) measured by nitrogen sorption are 40.3, 50.3, 38.8, and 36.7 m2/g, respectively. Meanwhile, by changing the urea/cobalt molar ratio, Co3O4(urea/Co-3), Co3O4(urea/Co-4), and Co3O4(urea/Co-5) have the surface areas of 42.1, 50.3, and 43.6 m2/g, respectively. The XRD results reveal that they all have the spinel structure.

    Figures 6 and 7 illustrate that the Co3O4 catalyst with a CTAB/Co molar ratio of 1 and a urea/Co molar ratio of 4 is most active, consistent with its high specific surface area. In the O2-TPD profiles shown in Figures 8 and 9.The oxygen desorbed at 100-270 ℃ is ascribed to the surface adsorbed oxygen, and that at 330-420 ℃ is assigned to the surface lattice oxygen. Obviously, the peak temperatures for the desorption of oxygen species on Co3O4 (CTAB/Co = 1 and urea/Co = 4) are 221.8 and 375.6 ℃, much lower than those on other catalysts.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6.  N2O conversions over various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB/cobalt molar ratio

    Figure 7

    Figure 7.  N2O conversions over various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing urea/cobalt molar ratio

    Figure 8

    Figure 8.  O2-TPD profiles of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB/cobalt molar ratio

    a: Co3O4(CTAB/Co-0.83); b: Co3O4(CTAB/Co-1); c: Co3O4(CTAB/Co-1.1); d: Co3O4(CTAB/Co-1.3)

    Figure 9

    Figure 9.  O2-TPD profiles of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing urea/cobalt molar ratio

    a: Co3O4(urea/Co-3); b: Co3O4(urea/Co-4); c: Co3O4(urea/Co-5)

    Above results illustrate that the Co3O4 catalyst synthesized by using 0.05 mol/L CTAB solution, with a CTAB/cobalt molar ratio of 1, and a urea/cobalt molar ratio of 4, exhibits high activity in N2O decomposition. To further enhance its catalytic activity, it was then modified by impregnation with K2CO3 solution. The K-modified 0.02 K/Co3O4 also shows the spinel structure and no crystallites of potassium species are observed. In comparison with K-free Co3O4, the surface area of 0.02 K/Co3O4 is decreased from 50.3 to 29.4 m2/g.

    The cobalt XPS spectra shown in Figure 10 indicate that K-free Co3O4 has a Co2+/Co3+ molar ratio of 1.65, whereas K-modified 0.02 K/Co3O4 has a Co2+/Co3+ molar ratio of 1.69. For N2O decomposition, more active Co2+ species on 0.02 K/Co3O4 are beneficial to the adsorption and activation of N2O molecules. In addition, the binding energy of Co3+ 2p3/2 electrons on K-free Co3O4 is 782.1 eV, about 0.3 eV lower than that on 0.02 K/Co3O4, suggesting a weaker Co3+-O- bond on the K-modified 0.02 K/Co3O4 catalyst.

    Figure 10

    Figure 10.  Cobalt XPS spectra of the K-free and K-modified Co3O4 catalysts a: Co3O4; b: 0.02K/Co3O4

    Figure 11 depicts the H2-TPR spectra of Co3O4 and 0.02K/Co3O4 catalysts.

    Figure 11

    Figure 11.  H2-TPR profiles of the K-free and K-modified Co3O4 catalysts

    a: Co3O4; b: 0.02K/Co3O4

    The low temperature peaks at 230-360 ℃ are ascribed to the reduction of Co3+ to Co2+, whereas the high temperature peaks at 360-540 ℃ are assigned to the reduction of Co2+ to metallic cobalt. For K-free Co3O4, the reduction of Co3+ to Co2+ appears at 338.7 ℃, whereas for K-modified 0.02 K/Co3O4, it is shifted to 307.0 ℃. It means that the Co3+-O- species on 0.02 K/Co3O4 is more easily reduced, consistent with the XPS result, which may contribute to the high activity of K-modified 0.02 K/Co3O4 (Figure 12).

    Figure 12

    Figure 12.  Activity of K-modified Co3O4 catalyst in N2O decomposition under different reaction atmospheres

    Figure 12 illustrates that when oxygen and steam are added into reaction feed, the conversion of N2O over 0.02 K/Co3O4 is decreased evidently. Table 3 gives the calculated rate coefficient (k), apparent activation energy (Ea) and pre-exponential factor (A). Obviously, oxygen and steam lead to a decrease in the reaction rate and an increase in the apparent activation energy; meanwhile, Ea and A values change in the same direction, viz., lnA = 6.95 + 0.144Ea, indicating that there is a dynamic compensation effect between Ea and A.

    Table 3

    Table 3.  Kinetic data of N2O decomposition over 0.02K/Co3O4 under different reaction atmospheres
    下载: 导出CSV
    Reaction feed k/s-1 Ea /(kJ·mol-1) lnA
    250 ℃ 275 ℃ 300 ℃ 325 ℃
    1%N2O + Ar 2.76 7.50 13.09 20.10 68.2 16.8
    1%N2O + 2%O2 + Ar 1.78 5.39 9.90 14.04 71.4 17.2
    1%N2O + 2%O2 + 8.2%H2O + Ar 0.52 1.42 3.19 6.73 88.5 19.7

    Figure 13 shows the catalytic stability of 0.02 K/Co3O4. Over the K-modified 0.02K/Co3O4 catalyst, the N2O conversion remains over 91% at 400 ℃ after conducting the reaction for 50 h in the presence of oxygen and steam, which is much more superior to the performance of Co3O4 prepared by precipitation reported in our previous work[17].

    Figure 13

    Figure 13.  Stability of the 0.02 K/Co3O4 catalyst in N2O decomposition at 400 ℃ under the atmosphere of 1%N2O, 2%O2, 8.2%H2O, and balanced argon

    Cobaltosic oxide precursors were hydrothermally synthesized by using CTAB as the template and the Co3O4 catalysts were then prepared by calcining the cobaltosic oxide precursors, which was further modified by impregnation with K2CO3 solution and used in the decomposition of N2O; the effect of various preparation parameters on the catalytic activity of Co3O4 in N2O decomposition was then investigated.

    The results indicated that the Co3O4 catalyst prepared by using 0.05 mol/L CTAB solution, with a CTAB to cobalt molar ratio of 1 and a urea to cobalt molar ratio of 4, exhibits high activity in N2O decomposition. The catalytic performance of Co3O4 can be further enhanced by modifying with K. Over the 0.02 K/Co3O4 catalyst, the N2O conversion remains over 91% at 400 ℃ after conducting the reaction for 50 h in the presence of oxygen and steam, which is much more superior to the performance of Co3O4 prepared by precipitation reported in our previous work.

    1. [1]

      LIN Y, MENG T, MA Z. Catalytic decomposition of N2O over RhOx supported on metal phosphates[J]. J Ind Eng Chem, 2015, 28:  138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.02.009

    2. [2]

      PACHATOURIDOU E, PAPISTA E, DELIMITIS A, VASILIADES M A, EFSTATHIOU A M, AMIRIDIS M D, ALEXEEV O S, BLOOM D, MARNELLOS G E, KONSOLAKIS M, ILIOPOULOU E. N2O decomposition over ceria-promoted Ir/Al2O3 catalysts:The role of ceria[J]. Appl Catal B:Environ, 2016, 187:  259-268. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.049

    3. [3]

      CARABINEIRO S A C, PAPISTA E, MARNELLOS G E, TAVARES P B, MALDONADO-HÓDAR F J, KONSOLAKIS M. Catalytic decomposition of N2O on inorganic oxides:Effect of doping with Au nanoparticles[J]. Mol Catal, 2017, 436:  78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2017.04.009

    4. [4]

      XIE P F, MA Z, ZHOU H B, HUANG C Y, YUE Y H, SHEN W, XU H L, HUA W M, GAO Z. Catalytic decomposition of N2O over Cu-ZSM-11 catalysts[J]. Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 2014, 191:  112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.02.044

    5. [5]

      KUBONOVÁ L, PEIKERTOVÁ P, KUTLÁKOVÁ K M, JIRÁTOVÁ K, SŁOWIK G, OBALOVÁ L, COOL P. Catalytic activity of cobalt grafted on ordered mesoporous silicamaterials in N2O decomposition and CO oxidation[J]. Mol Catal, 2017, 437:  57-72. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2017.04.037

    6. [6]

      MELIÁN-CABRERA I, VAN ECK E R H, ESPINOSA S, SILES-QUESADA S, FALCO L, KENTGENS A P M, KAPTEIJN F, MOULIJN J A. Tail gas catalyzed N2O decomposition over Fe-beta zeolite. On the promoting role of framework connected AlO6 sites in the vicinity of Fe by controlled dealumination during exchange[J]. Appl Catal B:Environ, 2017, 203:  218-226. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.019

    7. [7]

      SÁDOVSKÁ G, TABOR E, SAZAMA P, LHOTKA M, BERNAUER M, SOBALÍK Z. High temperature performance and stability of Fe-FER catalyst for N2O decomposition[J]. Catal Commun, 2017, 89:  133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2016.10.029

    8. [8]

      MANIAK G, STELMACHOWSKI P, ZASADA F, PISKORZ W, KOTARBA A, SOJKA Z. Guidelines for optimization of catalytic activity of 3d transition metal oxide catalysts in N2O decomposition by potassium promotion[J]. Catal Today, 2011, 176:  369-372. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.11.043

    9. [9]

      LIU Z M, HE C X, CHEN B H, LIU H Y. CuO-CeO2 mixed oxide catalyst for the catalytic decomposition of N2O in the presence of oxygen[J]. Catal Today, 2017, 297:  78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.074

    10. [10]

      LIU Z M, ZHOU Z Z, HE F, CHEN B H, ZHAO Y Y, XU Q. Catalytic decomposition of N2O over NiO-CeO2 mixed oxide catalyst[J]. Catal Today, 2017, 293/94:  56-60.

    11. [11]

      CHROMCÁKOVÁ Z, OBALOVÁ L, KOVANDA F, LEGUT D, TITOV A, RITZ M, FRIDRICHOVÁ D, MICHALIK S, KUSTROWSKI P, JIRÁTOVÁ K. Effect of precursor synthesis on catalytic activity of Co3O4 in N2O decomposition[J[[J]. Catal Today, 2015, 257:  18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.03.030

    12. [12]

      OHNISHI C, ASANO K, IWAMOTO S, CHIKAMA K, INOUE M. Alkali-doped Co3O4 catalysts for direct decomposition of N2O in the presence of oxygen[J]. Catal Today, 2007, 120:  145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2006.07.042

    13. [13]

      MANIAK G, STELMACHOWSKI P, KOTARBA A, SOJKA Z, RICO-PéREZ V, BUENO-LóPEZ A. Rationales for the selection of the best precursor for potassium doping of cobalt spinel based deN2O catalyst[J]. Appl Catal B:Environ, 2013, 136/137:  302-307. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.01.068

    14. [14]

      GRZYBEK G, WÓJCIK S, CIURA K, GRYBO Ś J, INDYKA P, OSZAJCA M, STELMACHOWSKI P, WITKOWSKI S, INGER M, WILK M, KOTARBA A, SOJKA Z. Influence of preparation method on dispersion of cobalt spinel over alumina extrudates and the catalyst deN2O activity[J]. Appl Catal B:Environ, 2017, 210:  34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.053

    15. [15]

      YU H B, WANG X P, WU X X, CHEN Y. Promotion of Ag for Co3O4 catalyzing N2O decomposition under simulated real reaction conditions[J]. Chem Eng J, 2018, 334:  800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.079

    16. [16]

      WANG Y Z, HU X B, ZHENG K, WEI X H, ZHAO Y X. Effect of SnO2 on the structure and catalytic performance of Co3O4 for N2O decomposition[J]. Catal Commun, 2018, 111:  70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2018.04.004

    17. [17]

      DOU Z, ZHANG H J, PAN Y F, XU X F. Catalytic decomposition of N2O over potassium-modified Cu-Co spinel oxides[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2014, 42(2):  238-245. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(14)60016-5

    18. [18]

      LIU T Q, GUO R, SHEN M, YU W L. Determination of the diffusion coefficients of micelle and the first CMC and second CMC in SDS and CTAB solution[J]. Acta Phys Chim Sin, 1996, 12(4):  337-340.

    19. [19]

      STELMACHOWSKI P, MANIAK G, KOTARBA A, SOJKA Z. Strong electronic promotion of Co3O4 towards N2O decomposition by surface alkali dopants[J]. Catal Commun, 2009, 10(7):  1062-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2008.12.057

    20. [20]

      PAN Y F, FENG M, CUI X, XU X F. Catalytic activity of alkali metal doped Cu-Al mixed oxides for N2O decomposition in the presence of oxygen[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2012, 40(5):  601-607. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(12)60024-3

    21. [21]

      FRANKEN T, PALKOVITS R. Investigation of potassium doped mixed spinels CuxCo3-xO4 as catalysts for an efficient N2O decomposition in real reaction conditions[J]. Appl Catal B:Environ, 2015, 176-177:  298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.002

  • Figure 1  XRD patterns of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentrations

    a: Co3O4(CTAB-0); b: Co3O4(CTAB-0.01); c: Co3O4(CTAB-0.03); d: Co3O4(CTAB-0.05); e: Co3O4(CTAB-0.06)

    Figure 2  SEM images of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentration

    (a): Co3O4(CTAB-0); (b): Co3O4(CTAB-0.01); (c): Co3O4(CTAB-0.03); (d): Co3O4(CTAB-0.05); (e): Co3O4(CTAB-0.06)

    Figure 3  N2O conversions over various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentration

    Figure 4  XPS spectra of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentration

    a: Co3O4(CTAB-0); b: Co3O4(CTAB-0.01); c: Co3O4(CTAB-0.03); d: Co3O4(CTAB-0.05); e: Co3O4(CTAB-0.06)

    Figure 5  O2-TPD profiles of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentration

    a: Co3O4(CTAB-0); b: Co3O4(CTAB-0.01); c: Co3O4(CTAB-0.03); d: Co3O4(CTAB-0.05); e: Co3O4(CTAB-0.06)

    Figure 6  N2O conversions over various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB/cobalt molar ratio

    Figure 7  N2O conversions over various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing urea/cobalt molar ratio

    Figure 8  O2-TPD profiles of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB/cobalt molar ratio

    a: Co3O4(CTAB/Co-0.83); b: Co3O4(CTAB/Co-1); c: Co3O4(CTAB/Co-1.1); d: Co3O4(CTAB/Co-1.3)

    Figure 9  O2-TPD profiles of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing urea/cobalt molar ratio

    a: Co3O4(urea/Co-3); b: Co3O4(urea/Co-4); c: Co3O4(urea/Co-5)

    Figure 10  Cobalt XPS spectra of the K-free and K-modified Co3O4 catalysts a: Co3O4; b: 0.02K/Co3O4

    Figure 11  H2-TPR profiles of the K-free and K-modified Co3O4 catalysts

    a: Co3O4; b: 0.02K/Co3O4

    Figure 12  Activity of K-modified Co3O4 catalyst in N2O decomposition under different reaction atmospheres

    Figure 13  Stability of the 0.02 K/Co3O4 catalyst in N2O decomposition at 400 ℃ under the atmosphere of 1%N2O, 2%O2, 8.2%H2O, and balanced argon

    Table 1.  BET surface area of various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentration

    Catalyst BET surface area A/(m2·g-1)
    Co3O4(CTAB-0) 21.1
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.01) 42.2
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.03) 47.2
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.05) 50.3
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.06) 27.8
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 2.  Kinetic data for N2O decomposition over various Co3O4 catalysts synthesized by changing the CTAB concentration

    Catalyst k/s-1 Ea/(kJ·mol-1) lnA
    300 ℃ 325 ℃ 350 ℃ 375 ℃ 400 ℃
    Co3O4(CTAB-0) - - 1.96 3.77 6.55 84.2 16.9
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.01) 0.75 0.91 2.45 4.02 6.55 74.5 15.2
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.03) 1.01 1.87 3.53 5.70 7.30 65.4 13.8
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.05) 1.33 2.45 4.40 7.50 11.50 69.8 14.9
    Co3O4(CTAB-0.06) 0.75 1.42 2.86 5.39 7.71 77.1 15.9
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 3.  Kinetic data of N2O decomposition over 0.02K/Co3O4 under different reaction atmospheres

    Reaction feed k/s-1 Ea /(kJ·mol-1) lnA
    250 ℃ 275 ℃ 300 ℃ 325 ℃
    1%N2O + Ar 2.76 7.50 13.09 20.10 68.2 16.8
    1%N2O + 2%O2 + Ar 1.78 5.39 9.90 14.04 71.4 17.2
    1%N2O + 2%O2 + 8.2%H2O + Ar 0.52 1.42 3.19 6.73 88.5 19.7
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  9
  • 文章访问数:  1309
  • HTML全文浏览量:  88
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2018-06-10
  • 收稿日期:  2018-02-24
  • 修回日期:  2018-05-01
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章