Light-driven interconversion of Pd2L4 cage and mononuclear PdL2 mediated by the isomerization of azobenzene ligand

Jinkang Zhu Xujin Chen Xin Jin Qiaochun Wang

Citation:  Jinkang Zhu, Xujin Chen, Xin Jin, Qiaochun Wang. Light-driven interconversion of Pd2L4 cage and mononuclear PdL2 mediated by the isomerization of azobenzene ligand[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2023, 34(6): 108002. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108002 shu

Light-driven interconversion of Pd2L4 cage and mononuclear PdL2 mediated by the isomerization of azobenzene ligand

English

  • Stimuli-responsive self-assembled systems have important value in the application of mimics of dynamic biosystems [1,2], constructions of molecular machines [3-5] and fabrications of smart materials [6-9]. Stimuli-responsive metal-organic cages whose structures can be changed to affect host-guest binding properties, thus achieving controlled encapsulation and release of guests, are receiving increasing attention. Various stimuli have been exploited to regulate the metal-organic cages, such as light [10,11], pH [12-14], solvent [15,16], temperature [17,18], electric potential [19,20], or ion [21-24]. Among these, light is highly advantageous because it can be used with high spatial and temporal precision and without waste generation.

    The development of light-responsive metal-organic cages remains challenging because the total number of successful examples is limited [25]. So far, two types of light-responsive metal-organic cages have been reported, one is that light-responsive units are dangled on the cages [26-28], and the other is that photoswitchable units serve as the integral part of the cage backbone, causing disassembly/reassembly [29,30], deformation [31-33] and interconversion between different assemblies [34-37]. Photoswitches can be used to modulate the structures of metal-assemblies, but they usually lead to the formation of non-discrete structures [38,39]. So far, there is still few related reports on realizing light-driven interconversion of discrete metal-assemblies. For example, the open- and closed-diarylethene were used to achieve the interconversion of Pd3L6 and Pd24L48 [34,35], and the light-driven switching between cage Pd2L4 and bowl Pd2L3 [36]. Another recent work on visible-light-driven Pd2L4 and PdL2 interconversion based on azobenzene ligand [37] was published during our preparation of this manuscript. Therefore, it is of significant scientific value to develop a light-responsive system that maintains discrete structures.

    Herein, a bis-pyridyl ligand containing an azobenzene backbone with two picolyls attached at both ends—(E)-1, 2-bis(4-(pyridin-3-ylmethyl)phenyl)diazene (trans-)—was designed and synthesized. When coordinated with Pd2+, trans leads to the formation of lantern-shaped cage [Pd2(trans)4]4+, while the cis-isomer (cis) forms tweezer-like [Pd(cis)2]2+. The interconversion of the two different discrete self-assemblies can be realized via the isomerization of L under alternative irradiation of 365 nm or 420 nm light (Fig. 1).

    Figure 1

    Figure 1.  Schematic diagram of the light-driven interconversion of L and its Pd2+ selfassemblies.

    The free ligand trans was synthesized by the oxidation of 4-(pyridin-3-ylmethyl)aniline (Scheme S1 in Supporting information) and its photoisomerization behavior was first investigated by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The complete 1H resonance assignments of trans and cis were based on their chemical shifts, ratios of integral areas, coupling constants (Fig. 2 and Schemes S1 and S2 in Supporting information) and the cross peaks in the 1H-1H COSY NMR spectrum (Figs. S5 and S8 in Supporting information). Upon the irradiation of trans in CD3CN at 365 nm for 5 min, it reached a photostationary state comprising of 94% cis (Fig. 2b). When the resulting solution was subsequently irradiated with 420 nm light for 5 min, cis was found to be switched back to trans with a new photostationary state containing 77% trans (Fig. 2c). When compared with those of trans, the protons on the azobenzene units (Hg and Hf) of cis shift upfield (ΔδHg = −1.06 ppm and ΔδHf = −0.29 ppm) due to encountering additional shielding effect of the remote out-of-plane aromatic ring (cis) [40]. The UV-vis absorption spectroscopy was also exploited to monitor the photoisomerization between trans and cis in acetonitrile. As illustrated in Fig. 2d, trans has a strong absorption band at 335 nm and a weak one at 430 nm assigned to its π-π* and n-π* excitation, respectively. Irradiation of trans with UV light leads to the decrease of absorption intensity at 335 and the increase at 430 nm, indicating the conversion from trans to cis. The reversed conversion was verified by the increase in absorption intensity at 335 nm and decrease at 430 nm after subsequent irradiation at 420 nm, and the isosbestic points for this isomerization process appeared at 285 and 390 nm. The thermal half-time of the switchable ligand L was measured as 83 h at 298 K from UV-vis spectra (Figs. S21 and S22 in Supporting information). Furthermore, by alternating irradiation of the ligand L with light of 365 or 420 nm for 30 cycles, the absorption intensity of L at 335 nm was monitored to perform a regular fluctuation, with slight change under the same light irradiation, indicating that it has good reversible photoisomerization (Fig. S23 in Supporting information).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2.  1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN) spectra of (a) trans-L, (b) the irradiation of the solution (a) at 365 nm for 5 min, (c) the irradiation of the solution (b) at 420 nm for 5 min (black represents trans-L and red represents cis-L). (d) UV-vis absorption spectra of L.

    The Pd-based assembly of trans was subsequently investigated. Mixing trans with [Pd(CH3CN)4](BF4)2 in 2:1 molar ratios in CD3CN at 70 ℃ for 5 h led to the formation of a new coordination species, which was characterized by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Fig. 3a, Fig. S9 and Scheme S3 in Supporting information). The 1H NMR signals of the form species were also attributed by the 1H-1H COSY NMR spectroscopy (Fig. S12 in Supporting information). Compared with the free trans, most of the proton signals on pyridine of this new species shift downfield (ΔδHb = +0.23 ppm, ΔδHc = +0.30 ppm and ΔδHd = +0.41 ppm), indicating the coordination with electron-withdrawing Pd2+ ion (Figs. 3a and b). However, Ha was found upfiled-shifting (ΔδHa = -0.57 ppm), which suggests that except the deshielding effects from the coordination Pd2+, Ha must bear a strong shielding effect from the newly formed assembly, as observed in other Pd-based molecular cages [10,41,42]. High resolution ESI-MS spectroscopy confirms this species as [Pd2(trans)4](BF4)4 cage. The MS signal peaks of trans-species appeared at m/z 417.8626, 585.8291, 922.2343, assigned to [Pd2(trans)4]4+, [Pd2(trans)4+BF4]3+, [Pd2(trans)4+2BF4]2+, respectively (Fig. 3f and Fig. S13 in Supporting information). And the resolved peaks appear with differences of 0.25, 0.33, 0.50, respectively, which are consistent with the simulated values, further confirming the composition of the coordination species (Fig. S14 in Supporting information).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3.  1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN) spectra of: (a) [Pd2(trans-L)4](BF4)4, (b) trans-L, (c) cis-L, (d) [Pd2(cis-L)2](BF4)2, (e) the irradiation of [Pd2(cis-L)2](BF4)2 at 420 nm for 20 min. High resolution ESI-MS spectra of (f) [Pd2(trans-L)4](BF4)4 and (g) [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2.

    The photoisomerization behavior of [Pd2(trans)4](BF4)4 in CD3CN was first irradiated at 365 nm for 20 min and then characterized by 1H NMR. The signals of [Pd2(trans)4](BF4)4 disappear and a new single set of peaks originates, accompanied with the significant upfield shifted Hf and Hg signals (ΔδHg = -1.30 ppm and ΔδHf = -0.33 ppm), suggesting the formation of a new discrete complex containing cis. The 1H NMR peaks of this cis-complex were assigned under the assistance of COSY NMR (Fig. S18 in Supporting information). The pyridine protons (Hb, Hc and Hd) of this cis-complex were found again downfield shifted (ΔδHb = +0.46 ppm, ΔδHc = +0.27 ppm and ΔδHd = +0.39 ppm) when compared with the free ligand cis (Figs. 3c and d), confirming that the pyridine unit still coordinates with Pd2+. However, the change of the chemical shifts of HaδHa = +0.05 ppm) is quite different from that of the above trans-cage (ΔδHa = -0.57 ppm), indicating that Ha of this cis-complex undergoes weaker shielding effects than that of the trans-cage. These results suggest the formation of a new Pdn(cis)2n assembly [43,44] rather than Pd2(cis)4. Further high resolution ESI-MS spectra show that two sets of peaks appeared at m/z 417.1156 and 921.2427, and their resolved peaks appear with differences of 0.5, 1.0, which are consistent with the simulated values of [PdC48H40N8]2+ and [PdC48H40N8BF4]+, respectively (Fig. 3g and Fig. S19 in Supporting information). All these results demonstrate that the cis-species is [Pd(cis)2](BF4)2, which can also be synthesized via the coordination of cis with [Pd(CH3CN)4](BF4)2 (Scheme S4 in Supporting information). Furthermore, all NMR peaks of [Pd2(trans)4](BF4)4 and [Pd(cis)2](BF4)2 remain sharp without splitting and no miscellaneous peaks appear, which indicates that the two species are symmetrical discrete palladium-based coordination compounds in regard to the NMR timescale.

    1H Diffusion-ordered NMR spectroscopies (DOSY) were also conducted for the characterization of the two discrete coordination assemblies [45]. The diffusion coefficients (D) of [Pd2(trans)4](BF4)4 and [Pd(cis)2](BF4)2) were measured as 6.17 × 10−10 and 1.07 × 10−9 m2/s in CD3CN (Fig. 4, Figs. S11 and S17 in Supporting information), and the hydrodynamic radiuses are calculated as 9.6 Å and 5.5 Å, respectively, according to Stokes-Einstein equation.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4.  Overlaid 1H DOSY NMR (600 MHz, CD3CN) spectra of [Pd2(trans-L)4](BF4)4 and [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2 (black represents Pd2(trans-L)4](BF4)4, and blue represents [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2).

    In general, the fine structure of coordination compound is intuitively provided by X-ray single crystal diffraction. However, both crystals of [Pd2(trans)4](BF4)4 and [Pd(cis)2](BF4)2 were not obtained after numerous attempts. Therefore, the theoretical structures of the two assemblies were determined by density function theory (DFT) geometry optimization. As shown in Fig. 5a and Fig. S28 (Supporting information), [Pd2(trans)4](BF4)4 features typical lantern-shaped structure with four twisted ligands and has a cavity with the distance of Pd to Pd being 15.1 Å. The longest outer diameter is 20.5 Å, which is well-matched with the hydrodynamic diameter measured from 1H DOSY experiment (2r = 2 × 9.6 Å = 19.2 Å). Moreover, four possible isomers of [Pd(cis)2](BF4)2 appear with energy difference within 3 kcal/mol (Figs. 5b-e, Fig. S29 and Table S1 in Supporting information) and the longest outer diameters were calculated as 12.9 Å, 13.2 Å, 17.0 Å and 17.2 Å in model A, model B, model C and model D, respectively. Considering that the calculated molecular diameter should be consistent with the hydrodynamic diameter (2r = 2 × 5.5 Å = 11.0 Å), [Pd(cis)2](BF4)2 is visualized as a tweezer-like structure with two cis on the same side of Pd (model A and model B). And it is assumed to be a mixture of two stereoisomers being in fast exchange with respect to the NMR timescale due to the similar energies of the structures of model A and model B (ΔE = 0.05 kcal/mol). Since the process of de- and re-coordination of the pyridine ligands to the palladium cations needs minute-scale time to complete in CH3CN at room temperature [46], the equilibration is speculated to take place by the rotations around the C-N and -CH2- bonds in [Pd(cis)2](BF4)2 (Scheme S4).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5.  DFT-optimized structure and the longest diameter calculated for (a) [Pd2(trans-L)4](BF4)4 and (b) model A of [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2, (c) model B of [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2, (d) model C of [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2, (e) model D of [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2.

    The reverse process was also investigated by the irradiation of [Pd(cis)2](BF4)2 with 420 nm light for 20 min. The 1H NMR spectra show that the intensity of the peaks corresponding to [Pd(cis)2](BF4)2 decrease and the signals for [Pd2(trans)4](BF4)4 appear, indicating [Pd(cis)2](BF4)2 again is converted to [Pd2(trans)4](BF4)4 in a 75% conversion efficiency according to the NMR integration (Fig. 3e and Fig. S25 in Supporting information). Moreover, the two Pd-based species exhibit good reversibility induced by switching light of 365 nm and 420 nm (Figs. S24 and S27 in Supporting information). The conversion of [Pd2(trans)4](BF4)4 and [Pd(cis)2](BF4)2 was also investigated by UV-vis absorption spectroscopy with different irradiation time (Figs. S26 in Supporting information). The absence of isosbestic points indicates that the presence of other process besides the isomerization of azobenzene, which is considered to be the coordination and de-coordination of pyridine with Pd2+.

    In conclusion, a light-switchable PdnL2n (n = 1 or 2) self-assembly system based on azobenzene-containing ligands was reported. The lantern-shaped cage Pd2L4 and the tweezer-like PdL2 were synthesized individually by coordination of palladium ion with trans or cis, respectively. And the two discrete coordination species can also be converted into each other by switching the light source of 365 nm or 420 nm. This system undergoes major structural changes and has potential applications as smart materials such as releasing loaded drugs.

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21572063), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2018SHZDZX03) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.108002.


    1. [1]

      A. Sikder, C. Esen, R.K. O'Reilly, Acc. Chem. Res. 55 (2022) 1609–1619. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00135

    2. [2]

      W. Li, Z. Yan, J. Ren, X. Qu, Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 (2018) 8639–8684. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00053K

    3. [3]

      I. Neira, A. Blanco-Gomez, J.M. Quintela, et al., Acc. Chem. Res. 53 (2020) 2336–2346. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00445

    4. [4]

      J. Wankar, N.G. Kotla, S. Gera, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 (2020) 1909049. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201909049

    5. [5]

      Y. Wu, L. Shangguan, Q. Li, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 19997–20002. doi: 10.1002/anie.202107903

    6. [6]

      Q. Wang, C. Wang, S. Li, et al., Chem. Mater. 34 (2022) 2085–2097. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03346

    7. [7]

      E. Moulin, L. Faour, C.C. Carmona-Vargas, N. Giuseppone, Adv. Mater. 32 (2020) 1906036. doi: 10.1002/adma.201906036

    8. [8]

      Y. Wang, J. Gong, X. Wang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202210542.

    9. [9]

      W. Zhang, Y. Luo, X.L. Ni, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 446 (2022) 136954. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136954

    10. [10]

      M. Han, R. Michel, B. He, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52 (2013) 1319–1323. doi: 10.1002/anie.201207373

    11. [11]

      R.J. Li, J.J. Holstein, W.G. Hiller, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 2097–2103. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b11872

    12. [12]

      L. Xu, D. Zhang, T.K. Ronson, J.R. Nitschke, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 7435–7438. doi: 10.1002/anie.202001059

    13. [13]

      S.M. Jansze, G. Cecot, K. Severin, Chem. Sci. 9 (2018) 4253–4257. doi: 10.1039/C8SC01108G

    14. [14]

      S.M. Jansze, K. Severin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 815–819. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b12738

    15. [15]

      L.X. Cai, D.N. Yan, P.M. Cheng, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 2016–2024. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c12064

    16. [16]

      Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhou, et al., Nat Commun. 11 (2020) 2727. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16556-3

    17. [17]

      D. Zhang, T.K. Ronson, S. Guryel, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 14534–14538. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b07307

    18. [18]

      S.G. Chen, Z.X. Zhao, X.N. Jiang, et al., Chem Asian J. 11 (2016) 465–469. doi: 10.1002/asia.201501090

    19. [19]

      V. Croue, S. Goeb, G. Szaloki, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 1746– 1750. doi: 10.1002/anie.201509265

    20. [20]

      R.A.S. Vasdev, J.A. Findlay, A.L. Garden, J.D. Crowley, Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 7506–7509. doi: 10.1039/C9CC03321A

    21. [21]

      S. Sudan, F. Fadaei-Tirani, R. Scopelliti, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202201823.

    22. [22]

      D. Preston, A. Fox-Charles, W.K.C. Lo, J.D. Crowley, Chem. Commun. 51 (2015) 9042–9045. doi: 10.1039/C5CC02226F

    23. [23]

      A.P. Birve, H.D. Patel, J.R. Price, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202115468.

    24. [24]

      D. Ogata, J. Yuasa, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 18424–18428. doi: 10.1002/anie.201911097

    25. [25]

      S.J. Wezenberg, Chem. Lett. 49 (2020) 609–615. doi: 10.1246/cl.200076

    26. [26]

      Y. Jiang, J. Park, P. Tan, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 8221–8227. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b01380

    27. [27]

      T. Murase, S. Sato, M. Fujita, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 (2007) 5133–5136. doi: 10.1002/anie.200700793

    28. [28]

      J. Park, L.B. Sun, Y.P. Chen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 (2014) 5842–5846. doi: 10.1002/anie.201310211

    29. [29]

      S. Fu, Q. Luo, M. Zang, et al., Materials Chem. Front. 3 (2019) 1238–1243. doi: 10.1039/C9QM00160C

    30. [30]

      R.J. Li, C. Pezzato, C. Berton, K. Severin, Chem. Sci. 12 (2021) 4981–4984. doi: 10.1039/D1SC00127B

    31. [31]

      S. Oldknow, D.R. Martir, V.E. Pritchard, et al., Chem. Sci. 9 (2018) 8150–8159. doi: 10.1039/C8SC03499K

    32. [32]

      C. Stuckhardt, D. Roke, W. Danowski, et al., Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 15 (2019) 2767–2773. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.15.268

    33. [33]

      H. Lee, J. Tessarolo, D. Langbehn, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 3099–3105. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c12011

    34. [34]

      Y. Gu, E.A. Alt, H. Wang, et al., Nature 560 (2018) 65–69. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0339-0

    35. [35]

      M. Han, Y. Luo, B. Damaschke, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 445–449. doi: 10.1002/anie.201508307

    36. [36]

      R.J. Li, J. Tessarolo, H. Lee, G.H. Clever, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 3865–3873. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c12188

    37. [37]

      R.G. DiNardi, A.O. Douglas, R. Tian, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202205701.

    38. [38]

      A.D.W. Kennedy, R.G. DiNardi, L.L. Fillbrook, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 28 (2022) e202104461.

    39. [39]

      X. Yan, J.F. Xu, T.R. Cook, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2014) 8717–8722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408620111

    40. [40]

      K.M. Tait, J.A. Parkinson, S.P. Bates, et al., J. Photoch. Photobio. A 154 (2003) 179–188. doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(02)00347-7

    41. [41]

      J. Zhu, C. Li, X. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107693. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.07.036

    42. [42]

      M. Yamashina, T. Yuki, Y. Sei, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 21 (2015) 4200–4204. doi: 10.1002/chem.201406445

    43. [43]

      S. Bandi, S. Samantray, R.D. Chakravarthy, et al., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016 (2016) 2816–2827. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201600259

    44. [44]

      D.A. McMorran, P.J. Steel, Supramol. Chem. 14 (2010) 79–85. doi: 10.1080/10610270290006600

    45. [45]

      L. Avram, Y. Cohen, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 586–602. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00197D

    46. [46]

      G.H. Clever, M. Shionoya, Chem. Eur. J. 16 (2010) 11792–11796. doi: 10.1002/chem.201002013

  • Figure 1  Schematic diagram of the light-driven interconversion of L and its Pd2+ selfassemblies.

    Figure 2  1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN) spectra of (a) trans-L, (b) the irradiation of the solution (a) at 365 nm for 5 min, (c) the irradiation of the solution (b) at 420 nm for 5 min (black represents trans-L and red represents cis-L). (d) UV-vis absorption spectra of L.

    Figure 3  1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3CN) spectra of: (a) [Pd2(trans-L)4](BF4)4, (b) trans-L, (c) cis-L, (d) [Pd2(cis-L)2](BF4)2, (e) the irradiation of [Pd2(cis-L)2](BF4)2 at 420 nm for 20 min. High resolution ESI-MS spectra of (f) [Pd2(trans-L)4](BF4)4 and (g) [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2.

    Figure 4  Overlaid 1H DOSY NMR (600 MHz, CD3CN) spectra of [Pd2(trans-L)4](BF4)4 and [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2 (black represents Pd2(trans-L)4](BF4)4, and blue represents [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2).

    Figure 5  DFT-optimized structure and the longest diameter calculated for (a) [Pd2(trans-L)4](BF4)4 and (b) model A of [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2, (c) model B of [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2, (d) model C of [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2, (e) model D of [Pd(cis-L)2](BF4)2.

  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  4
  • 文章访问数:  364
  • HTML全文浏览量:  31
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2023-06-15
  • 收稿日期:  2022-08-30
  • 接受日期:  2022-11-10
  • 修回日期:  2022-11-04
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-11-12
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章