Synthesis, Crystal Structure and DNA-Binding Property of Ag(Ⅰ) Complex with 1-(3-Ethylpyrazin-2-yl)ethylidene-4-phenylsemicarbazide

Hao WU Yuan WANG Ling ZHANG Rui-Fang KANG Wei-Na WU

Citation:  WU Hao, WANG Yuan, ZHANG Ling, KANG Rui-Fang, WU Wei-Na. Synthesis, Crystal Structure and DNA-Binding Property of Ag(Ⅰ) Complex with 1-(3-Ethylpyrazin-2-yl)ethylidene-4-phenylsemicarbazide[J]. Chinese Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 2018, 34(6): 1137-1142. doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2018.108 shu

3-乙基-2-乙酰吡嗪缩4-苯基氨基脲Ag(Ⅰ)配合物的合成、结构和DNA结合性质

    通讯作者: 王元, wangyuan08@hpu.edu.cn
    吴伟娜, wuwn08@hpu.edu.cn
  • 基金项目:

    河南省青年骨干教师项目 2014GGJS-045

    河南理工大学杰出青年基金 J2015-4

    河南省科技厅基础与前沿项目 162300410011

    国家自然科学基金 21001040

    国家自然科学基金(No.21001040), 河南省科技厅基础与前沿项目(No.162300410011), 河南省青年骨干教师项目(No.2014GGJS-045)和河南理工大学杰出青年基金(No.J2015-4)资助

摘要: 合成并通过单晶衍射、元素分析及红外光谱表征了配合物[Ag2(HL)(NO3)2]n(1)的结构(HL为3-乙基-2-乙酰吡嗪缩4-苯基氨基脲)。单晶衍射结果表明, 配合物1中, HL作为中性四齿配体连接2个Ag(Ⅰ)中心, 其中一个Ag(Ⅰ)中心与HL配体中的ON2供体(羰基O, 亚胺N和吡嗪N1原子)和2个单齿硝酸根配位, 构成扭曲的四方锥配位构型; 而另一个Ag(Ⅰ)离子与1个单齿硝酸根, 1个双齿硝酸根和HL配体中的吡嗪N4原子配位, 形成扭曲平面正方形配位构型。另外, 相邻的Ag(Ⅰ)离子通过桥联的硝酸根离子相互连接形成二维层状结构; 此外, 配合物1与DNA的相互作用强于配体。

English

  • In recent years, semicarbazones have become increasingly important as fine chemical intermediates[1-3], which could also form complexes with the transition metal ions, producing amazing biological activities, such as anti-bacterial, antitumor, antivirus[4-6].

    On the other hand, as one of the most important heterocycles, pyrazine is of significant interest in the pharmacological field[7].Our previous work has shown that several Cu(Ⅱ)/Zn(Ⅱ) complexes with semicarba-zones bearing pyrazine unit have potential antitumor activities[8-10].However, the investigation on the Ag(Ⅰ) complexes of such type of ligands are relatively scarce[11].In fact, Ag(Ⅰ) complexes have been known for centuries, especially with respect to medical prop-erties[12].Meanwhile, the polynuclear metal complexes are highly desired, because they usually possess higher biological activities than the mononuclear ones[13-15].As the continuation of our work, the complex [Ag2(HL)(NO3)2]n (1) derived from 1-(3-ethylpyrazin-2-yl)ethylidene-4-phenylsemicarbazide (HL) has been synthesized and structural determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.In addition, the interactions of HL and 1 with ct-DNA have been studied by ethidium bromide (EB) fluorescence probe.

    Solvents and starting materials for synthesis were purchased commercially and used as received.The ligand HL was synthesized according to the reference[10].Elemental analysis was carried out on an Elemental Vario EL analyzer.The IR spectra (ν=4 000~400 cm-1) were determined by the KBr pressed disc method on a Bruker V70 FT-IR spectrophotometer.The UV spectra were recorded on a Purkinje General TU-1800 spectrophotometer.The interactions between the compounds and ct-DNA are measured using literature method[9] via emission spectra on a Varian CARY Eclipse spectrophotometer.

    The complex 1 was generated by reaction of the ligand HL (5 mmol) with AgNO3 (molar ratio 1:2) in methanol solution (10 mL).Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained by evaporating the corresponding reaction solutions at room temperature.Colorless blocks.Anal.Calcd.for C15H17Ag2N7O7(%):C 27.86, H 2.67, N 15.59; Found(%):C 28.91, H 2.75, N 15.73.FT-IR (cm-1):ν(C=O) 1 685, ν(C=N) 1 600, ν(C=N)pyrazine 1 537, ν1(NO3) 1 498, ν4(NO3) 1 382 and 1 311.

    The X-ray diffraction measurement for HL and complex 1 was performed on a Bruker SMART APEX Ⅱ CCD diffractometer equipped with a graphite monochromatized Mo radiation (λ=0.071 073 nm) by using φ-ω scan mode.Semi-empirical absorption correction was applied to the intensity data using the SADABS program[16].The structures were solved by direct methods and refined by full matrix least-square on F2 using the SHELXTL-97 program[17].All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically.All the H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model.Details of the crystal parameters, data collection and refinements for complex is summarized in Table 1.

    表 1

    表 1  Crystal data and structure refinement for HL and complex 1
    Table 1.  Crystal data and structure refinement for HL and complex 1
    下载: 导出CSV
    HL 1
    Empirical formula C15H17N5O C15H17Ag2N7O7
    Formula weight 283.34 623.10
    T/K 293(2) 296(2)
    Size/mm 0.20×0.18×0.08 0.25×0.22×0.19
    Crystal system Triclinic Monoclinic
    Space group P1 P21/n
    a/nm 0.739 28(15) 1.137 2(2)
    b/nm 1.428 5(3) 1.386 4(3)
    c/nm 1.529 5(3) 1.275 6(3)
    α/(°) 68.372(3)
    β/(°) 80.883(3) 105.618(3)
    γ/(°) 79.671(4)
    V/nm3 1.469 6(5) 1.937 0(7)
    Z 4 4
    Dc/(g·cm-3) 1.281 2.137
    Absorption coefficient/mm-1 0.085 2.079
    F(000) 600 1 224
    Reflection collected, Unique (Rint) 7 511, 5 151 (0.023 7) 9 458, 3 426 (0.021 4)
    Rint 0.024 0.021
    Data, restraint, parameter 5 151, 0, 381 3 426, 0, 281
    Goodness-of-fit (GOF) on F2 1.033 1.026
    R indices [I≥2σ(I)] R1=0.057 0, wR2=0.126 2 R1=0.032 9, wR2=0.074 7
    R indices (all data) R1=0.120 3, wR2=0.154 7 R1=0.040 9, wR2=0.078 8

    CCDC:1588866, HL; 1588867, 1.

    Selected bond distances and angles of HL and complex 1 are listed in Table 2.As shown in Fig. 1a, there are two independent molecules in the asymmetry unit of HL, in which the bond lengths of C9-O1 (0.122 6(3) nm) and C24-O2 (0.122 6(3) nm) are comparable to those of some reported semicarbazone ligands[18].Pairs of intermolecular N-H…O hydrogen bonds link two molecules into a centrosymmetry dimer in the solid state (N4-H4…O2, with D…A distance being 0.286 9(3) nm, D-H…A angle being 162.0°; N9-H9…O1, with D…A distance being 0.294 0(3) nm, D-H…A angle being 162.0°).

    表 2

    表 2  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angles (°) of HL and complex 1
    Table 2.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angles (°) of HL and complex 1
    下载: 导出CSV
    HL
    N4-C9 0.135 8(3) C7-N3 0.127 3(3) O1-C9 0.122 6(3)
    N9-C24 0.136 2(3) C22-N8 0.128 6(3) O2-C24 0.122 6(3)
    1
    Ag1-O1 0.241 9(3) Ag1-N1 0.242 1(3) Ag1-N3 0.238 3(3)
    Ag1-O2 0.238 7(3) Ag1-O6 0.266 7(3) Ag2-O5 0.253 4(4)
    Ag2-O3 0.229 0(3) Ag2-N2 0.225 1(3) Ag2-O4 0.279 9(4)
    N3-Ag1-O1 67.11(10) O1-Ag1-N1 134.08(10) O2-Ag1-O1 134.45(11)
    N3-Ag1-O2 145.68(11) O2-Ag1-N1 85.97(10) N3-Ag1-N1 67.02(10)
    N2-Ag2-O5 103.99(13) N2-Ag2-O3 155.04(13) O3-Ag2-O5 82.88(13)
    N3-Ag1-06 124.40(11) O2-Ag1-O6 81.52(11) O1-Ag1-O6 102.53(10)
    O1-Ag1-O6 102.53(10) N1-Ag1-O6 104.69(12) N2-Ag2-O4 115.73(11)
    O3-Ag2-O4 47.71(11) O5-Ag2-O4 128.40(12)
    Symmetry codes:x+1, y, z

    As illustrated in Fig. 1b, the asymmetry unit of complex 1 contains two independent Ag(Ⅰ) ions.One of them is surrounded by one HL ligand with ON2 donor set, two O atoms from two nitrate anions, giving a distorted square pyramid coordination geometry; while its counterpart with a planar square coordination geometry is coordinated with three O atoms from two adjacent nitrate anions and terminal pyrazine N4 atom of HL.It is worth noting that O4 and O6 atoms also participate coordination, since the bond lengths of Ag1-O6 (0.266 7(3) nm) and Ag2-O4 (0.279 9(4) nm) are within the scope of normal inspection and matches with the Ag-O bond in some Ag(Ⅰ) complexes in the literature[19].The neighboring Ag(Ⅰ) ions are linked by two types of nitrate ions into a 1D chain along a axis (in the case of N7/O5-O7, Fig. 1c), and a 1D zig-zag chain along c axis (in the case of N6/O2-O4, Fig. 1d), respectively, thus giving a 2D framework paralleling to (101) plane (Fig. 1e).In the crystal, intermolecular N-H…O hydrogen bonds between the semicarbazone ligands and nitrate anions are also presented (N5-H5…O7, with D…A distance being 0.289 5(5) nm, D-H…A angle being 162.0°; N4-H4…O6, with D…A distance being 0.307 1(5) nm, D-H…A angle being 165.0°, Symmetry codes:x, y, z+1).

    图 1

    图 1  Diamond drawing of HL (a) and 1 (b) with 30% thermal ellipsoids; (c) Chain-like structure along a axis in complex 1; (d) Zig-zag chain-like structure along c axis in complex 1; (e) Extended 2D framework structure in complex 1
    Figure 1.  Diamond drawing of HL (a) and 1 (b) with 30% thermal ellipsoids; (c) Chain-like structure along a axis in complex 1; (d) Zig-zag chain-like structure along c axis in complex 1; (e) Extended 2D framework structure in complex 1

    The infrared spectral bands most useful for deter-mining the mode of coordination of the semicarbazone ligand are the ν(C=O), ν(C=N), and ν(C=N)pyrizine vibrations.As our previous work shows, such three bands of the ligand HL are at 1 705, 1 609 and 1 595 cm-1 [10], while they shift to 1 685, 1 600 and 1 537 cm-1 in the complex 1, respectively, indicating that the carbonyl O, imine N and pyrizine N atoms take part in the coordination[8].In addition, the intense absorption bands in the spectra of complex 1 associated with the asymmetric stretching appear at 1 382, 1 311 cm-1 (ν4) and 1 498 cm-1 (ν1), clearly establishing the existence of monodentate and bidentate NO3- ligands[8, 10, 20].It is in accordance with the crystal structure study.

    The UV spectra of complex 1 in methanol solution (concentration:10 μmol·L-1) were measured at room temperature (Fig. 2).The spectra of HL features one main band located around 275 nm (ε=6 929 L·moL-1·cm-1) and a shoulder at 282 nm (ε=6 567 L·moL-1· cm-1), which could be assigned to characteristic π-π* transition of benzene and pyrazine units, respectively[10].In complex 1, such two peaks are merged to 291 nm (ε=3 813 L·moL-1·cm-1) with concomitant hypochromic effect, confirming the coordination of ligand HL in complex 1.

    图 2

    图 2  UV spectra of the ligand HL and complex 1 in the methanol solution at room temperature
    Figure 2.  UV spectra of the ligand HL and complex 1 in the methanol solution at room temperature

    It is well known that EB can intercalate nonspe-cifically into DNA, which causes it to fluoresce strongly.Competitive binding of other drugs to DNA and EB will result in displacement of bound EB and a decrease in the fluorescence intensity[9].As shown in Fig. 3, the fluorescence intensities of EB bound to ct-DNA at about 600 nm show remarkable decreasing trends with the increasing concentration of the tested samples, indicating that some EB molecules are exchanged by the tested compounds.The quenching of EB bound to DNA by the compounds is in agreement with the linear Stern-Volmer equation:I0/I=1+Ksqr[8], where I0 and I represent the fluorescence intensities in the absence and presence of quencher, respectively, Ksq is the linear Stern-Volmer quenching constant, r is the ratio of the concentration of quencher and DNA.In the quenching plots of I0/I versus r, Ksq values are given by the slopes.The Ksq values of complex 1 is tested to be 0.781, which is much higher than that of the ligand HL (0.363).The results indicate that inter-actions of the complex 1 with DNA are stronger than that of the ligand HL.This is probably due to the structure rigidity and metal-ligand synergism effect of the complex 1[8-9].In addition, 2D framework structure of the complex 1 may be also responsible for its DNA interaction ability in some content.

    图 3

    图 3  Emission spectra of EB-DNA system in the presence of HL (a) and complex 1 (b), respectively
    Figure 3.  Emission spectra of EB-DNA system in the presence of HL (a) and complex 1 (b), respectively
    1. [1]

      Farhadi S, Mahmoudi F, Dusek M, et al.J.Mol.Struct., 2017, 1130:592-602 doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.10.081

    2. [2]

      Enyedy A, Bognár G M, Nagy N V, et al.Polyhedron, 2014, 67:242-252 doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2013.08.053

    3. [3]

      Salem N M H, Rashad A R, Sayed L E, et al.Inorg.Chim.Acta, 2015, 432:231-242 doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2015.04.019

    4. [4]

      Farhadi S, Mahmoudi F, Dusek M, et al.Polyhedron, 2017, 122:247-256 doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2016.11.034

    5. [5]

      Venkatachalam T K, Bernhardt P V, Noble C J, et al.J.Inorg.Biochem., 2016, 162:295-308 doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2016.04.006

    6. [6]

      Todorovic T R, Vukasinovic J, Portalone G, et al.MedChemComm, 2017, 8:103-111 doi: 10.1039/C6MD00501B

    7. [7]

      Patil S R, Asrondkar A, Patil V, et al.Bioorg.Med.Chem.Lett., 2017, 27:3845-3850 doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.06.053

    8. [8]

      毛盼东, 赵晓雷, 邵志鹏, 等.无机化学学报, 2017, 33:890-896 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2017.109MAO Pan-Dong, ZHAO Xiao-Lei, SHAO Zhi-Peng, et al.Chinese J.Inorg.Chem., 2017, 33:890-896 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2017.109

    9. [9]

      林龙, 李先宏, 张波, 等.无机化学学报, 2017, 33:143-148 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2016.283LIN Long, LI Xian-Hong, ZHANG Bo, et al.Chinese J.Inorg.Chem., 2017, 33:143-148 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2016.283

    10. [10]

      毛献杰, 周利华, 伏思连, 等.无机化学学报, 2017, 33:163-168 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2017.023MAO Xian-Jie, ZHOU Li-Hua, FU Si-Lian, et al.Chinese J.Inorg.Chem., 2017, 33:163-168 doi: 10.11862/CJIC.2017.023

    11. [11]

      Alisir S H, Sariboga B, Caglar S, et al.J.Mol.Struct., 2017, 1130:156-164 doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.10.026

    12. [12]

      Movahedi E, Rezvani A R.J.Mol.Struct., 2017, 1139:407-417 doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.03.042

    13. [13]

      Ahmar S, Mac Donald D G, Vijayaratnam N, et al.Angew.Chem., 2010, 122:4524 doi: 10.1002/ange.201000686

    14. [14]

      Sun D, Liu F J, Huang R B, et al.Inorg.Chem., 2011, 50:12393 doi: 10.1021/ic201746q

    15. [15]

      Bosch E, Barnes C L.Inorg.Chem., 2002, 41:2543-2547 doi: 10.1021/ic010795q

    16. [16]

      Sheldrick G M.SADABS, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1996.

    17. [17]

      Sheldrick G M.SHELX-97, Program for the Solution and the Refinement of Crystal Structures, University of Göttingen, Germany, 1997.

    18. [18]

      Sheremetev A B, Yudin I L.Russ.Chem.Rev., 2003, 72:87-100 doi: 10.1070/RC2003v072n01ABEH000776

    19. [19]

      Kan W Q, Wen S Z, Kan Y H, et al.Polyhedron, 2015, 85:246-254 doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2014.08.020

    20. [20]

      Nakamoto K.Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds.4th Ed.New York:Wiley, 1986:257

  • Figure 1  Diamond drawing of HL (a) and 1 (b) with 30% thermal ellipsoids; (c) Chain-like structure along a axis in complex 1; (d) Zig-zag chain-like structure along c axis in complex 1; (e) Extended 2D framework structure in complex 1

    Symmetry codes:x+1, y, z; -x,-y,-z+1;x-1, y, z; x, y, z+1 for 1

    Figure 2  UV spectra of the ligand HL and complex 1 in the methanol solution at room temperature

    c=10 μmol·L-1

    Figure 3  Emission spectra of EB-DNA system in the presence of HL (a) and complex 1 (b), respectively

    Arrow shows the fluorescence intensities change of EB-DNA system upon increasing tested complex concentration; Inset:plot of I0/I versus r

    Table 1.  Crystal data and structure refinement for HL and complex 1

    HL 1
    Empirical formula C15H17N5O C15H17Ag2N7O7
    Formula weight 283.34 623.10
    T/K 293(2) 296(2)
    Size/mm 0.20×0.18×0.08 0.25×0.22×0.19
    Crystal system Triclinic Monoclinic
    Space group P1 P21/n
    a/nm 0.739 28(15) 1.137 2(2)
    b/nm 1.428 5(3) 1.386 4(3)
    c/nm 1.529 5(3) 1.275 6(3)
    α/(°) 68.372(3)
    β/(°) 80.883(3) 105.618(3)
    γ/(°) 79.671(4)
    V/nm3 1.469 6(5) 1.937 0(7)
    Z 4 4
    Dc/(g·cm-3) 1.281 2.137
    Absorption coefficient/mm-1 0.085 2.079
    F(000) 600 1 224
    Reflection collected, Unique (Rint) 7 511, 5 151 (0.023 7) 9 458, 3 426 (0.021 4)
    Rint 0.024 0.021
    Data, restraint, parameter 5 151, 0, 381 3 426, 0, 281
    Goodness-of-fit (GOF) on F2 1.033 1.026
    R indices [I≥2σ(I)] R1=0.057 0, wR2=0.126 2 R1=0.032 9, wR2=0.074 7
    R indices (all data) R1=0.120 3, wR2=0.154 7 R1=0.040 9, wR2=0.078 8
    下载: 导出CSV

    Table 2.  Selected bond lengths (nm) and angles (°) of HL and complex 1

    HL
    N4-C9 0.135 8(3) C7-N3 0.127 3(3) O1-C9 0.122 6(3)
    N9-C24 0.136 2(3) C22-N8 0.128 6(3) O2-C24 0.122 6(3)
    1
    Ag1-O1 0.241 9(3) Ag1-N1 0.242 1(3) Ag1-N3 0.238 3(3)
    Ag1-O2 0.238 7(3) Ag1-O6 0.266 7(3) Ag2-O5 0.253 4(4)
    Ag2-O3 0.229 0(3) Ag2-N2 0.225 1(3) Ag2-O4 0.279 9(4)
    N3-Ag1-O1 67.11(10) O1-Ag1-N1 134.08(10) O2-Ag1-O1 134.45(11)
    N3-Ag1-O2 145.68(11) O2-Ag1-N1 85.97(10) N3-Ag1-N1 67.02(10)
    N2-Ag2-O5 103.99(13) N2-Ag2-O3 155.04(13) O3-Ag2-O5 82.88(13)
    N3-Ag1-06 124.40(11) O2-Ag1-O6 81.52(11) O1-Ag1-O6 102.53(10)
    O1-Ag1-O6 102.53(10) N1-Ag1-O6 104.69(12) N2-Ag2-O4 115.73(11)
    O3-Ag2-O4 47.71(11) O5-Ag2-O4 128.40(12)
    Symmetry codes:x+1, y, z
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 加载中
计量
  • PDF下载量:  3
  • 文章访问数:  953
  • HTML全文浏览量:  113
文章相关
  • 发布日期:  2018-06-10
  • 收稿日期:  2017-12-05
  • 修回日期:  2018-01-18
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

/

返回文章